Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 1
ThatGuy Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 1
The Jets starting Geno Smith over Fitzpatrick got me thinking..

Would you trade QBs with them? I wouldnt.

And that led me to look around the league, Sure we'd take Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers in a second, but what teams in this league would you consider having a worse QB situation than us? Or even on par?

Which teams would you NOT trade QBs with?
multiple choice
Votes accepted starting: 10/19/16 01:37 PM
You must vote before you can view the results of this poll.

Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 1
ThatGuy Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 1
I'm going to point out that when I voted, I wasn't nessecarily saying that teams QBS are "worse" than ours..

For example, Miami. Tannehill is probably better than all of our QBs, but I don't think he's that good overall, and would not be interested in having him, so I voted no..

Another consideration was San Diego, Sure Rivers is great, but would you put him on this team, win 5-6 games a year, and then what, 2 years from now, be right back where we are? If not worse?


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,812
Likes: 932
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,812
Likes: 932
Wow. There are a LOT of crappy qb's in this league.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
I voted for Flacco and Tannehill, not because they are worse than the guys that we have, but because their contracts are oppressive.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Since this is on a Brown's board, this vote will more than likely be very, very subjective and should not be considered as an accurate evaluation.

It's a good topic and I have no problem w/you starting it. I'm just saying that I don't think the results will be legit and should not be referenced.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Oh wow! I voted to see the results. Hilarious!

Green Bay, Dallas, Seattle, Washington, Carolina, Philly, New England, Atlanta, Pittsburgh, New Orleans, Baltimore, etc.

rofl

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 247
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,290
Likes: 247
Looks like someone voted for every option.


#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 1
ThatGuy Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 1
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Since this is on a Brown's board, this vote will more than likely be very, very subjective and should not be considered as an accurate evaluation.


I'm asking Browns fans, about swapping the Browns QBs. Why would I ask other teams fans?

Quote:
It's a good topic and I have no problem w/you starting it. I'm just saying that I don't think the results will be legit and should not be referenced.


Phew. I was really worried there I wasn't going to get your permission to post this..


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
You're such a pleasant person.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,945
Likes: 352
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,945
Likes: 352
I would not trade with the 49'ers, or the Jets.

The Bears have a pretty bad QB situation, and I would not trade with them either.

I can't think of too many others I wouldn;t trade with.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
agree with ytown ... jets, 49ers are the first two to come to mind

Texans, Bears are also bad


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
You aren't including the Browns in that group? Seriously?

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 1
ThatGuy Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 1
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
You aren't including the Browns in that group? Seriously?


Why would he trade the Browns QBs for the Browns QBs?


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
You aren't including the Browns in that group? Seriously?
i thought this was comparing others' to our own


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,818
Likes: 270
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,818
Likes: 270
Jets, Texans


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

2023: The year we got a legit D.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
texans might be the most screwed because osweiller is paid SO much to suck


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
texans might be the most screwed because osweiller is paid SO much to suck


He definitely sucks, but the Texans can get out of his contract after year two with not too much damage.

http://overthecap.com/player/brock-osweiler/8/

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 1
ThatGuy Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Likes: 1
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
texans might be the most screwed because osweiller is paid SO much to suck


He definitely sucks, but the Texans can get out of his contract after year two with not too much damage.

http://overthecap.com/player/brock-osweiler/8/


That seems to be a common theme with these middle of the road QB deals.

They eventually become 1 year deals with options.


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
texans might be the most screwed because osweiller is paid SO much to suck


He definitely sucks, but the Texans can get out of his contract after year two with not too much damage.

http://overthecap.com/player/brock-osweiler/8/


Which is very likely IMO.


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,025
Likes: 1
S
Legend
Offline
Legend
S
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,025
Likes: 1
I just kinda lump everyone together that doesn't have a good quarterback...

I mean you can go back and forth about whether or not the Browns have a better QB situation than the Bears, but it's like listening to two really fat people arguing about who's fatter.

But honestly, if you asked all 31 teams other than us if they would like to trade Qb sets, I don't think anyone pulls the trigger. I don't think the Bears, 49'ers, Texans, Jets, etc.. see it as any kind of upgrade.

This is a depressing topic.

DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk K-9 Consensus QB Situations, Who has it worse?

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5