Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Versatile Dog #1735401 02/26/20 09:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,057
Likes: 336
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,057
Likes: 336
You could have just explained it like this when I asked. I'm still not sure I 100% buy it.

Apparently, asking a question about what you mean by quoting your exact post is somehow trying to twist your words? Why is it not honest debate when I ask a question?

Next time you're trying to explain a point that complex, you should probably use more than a single, vague sentence and actually compare something if you're trying to make a comparison. I'm not a mind reader.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
DiamDawg #1735402 02/26/20 09:50 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,146
Likes: 1807
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,146
Likes: 1807
Originally Posted By: DiamDawg
I said your post was ignorant, not u ... i said it cause it was and still is ....

In your 1st reply to me that was too a post i made to someone else u said

Quote:
wanting to micro-analyze all of those variables to come to a conclusion would be the definition of why STATS ARE FOR LOSERS.


U just argued that gathering more info before making a decision is stupid as long as u have the # of targets in this case ... ok .... rolleyes ...

Then u go and add rates into the mix and throw in the fact they have one of the best we duo’s in the league .... thanks ... u proved my point ... thumbsup

U also left out how the injury affected there targets this year .... 1/2 of an extremely talented duos on the league realistically played in 8 games .... he didn’t finish the 1st quarter in the game he got hurt in and he played a play or two against KC ...

Not that him being hurt mattered ... he only averaged 147.5 targets the previous two years and had 48 this year .... not like 100 - whatever the invisible war playing opposite Diggs got is many targets ....

I get it ... less info is better ... got it ... thumbsup

Here, we'll just make this easy for everyone.

Stefanski has no clue how to utilize TEs, because of this Njoku is likely gone after the season...
and so it is law. Why?? Lmao well, we all know why.

If anyone questions this with facts, stats or even first hand knowledge, they are troublemakers incapable of comprehending other's posts (even the one's that never existed. rofl)

Great. Winner, winner, chicken dinner.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
oobernoober #1735430 02/27/20 06:50 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
I agree ... if we get a fully rounded TE, Njoku gets better too


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
PETE314 #1735793 02/27/20 08:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
.

Last edited by cfrs15; 02/27/20 08:35 PM.
PETE314 #1736244 02/29/20 12:30 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 17
H
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
H
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 878
Likes: 17
I wonder what the mphasis on Njoku will be. Will the scheme dictate whether he puts more work into his catching or his blocking? Obviously, he would want to get better at both,but there is only so much time in a day.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2020 NFL Season 2020 NFL Draft TE's...

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5