I said your post was ignorant, not u ... i said it cause it was and still is ....
In your 1st reply to me that was too a post i made to someone else u said
wanting to micro-analyze all of those variables to come to a conclusion would be the definition of why STATS ARE FOR LOSERS.
U just argued that gathering more info before making a decision is stupid as long as u have the # of targets in this case ... ok ....
...
Then u go and add rates into the mix and throw in the fact they have one of the best we duo’s in the league .... thanks ... u proved my point ...
U also left out how the injury affected there targets this year .... 1/2 of an extremely talented duos on the league realistically played in 8 games .... he didn’t finish the 1st quarter in the game he got hurt in and he played a play or two against KC ...
Not that him being hurt mattered ... he only averaged 147.5 targets the previous two years and had 48 this year .... not like 100 - whatever the invisible war playing opposite Diggs got is many targets ....
I get it ... less info is better ... got it ...