Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,543
Likes: 140
TTTDawg Offline OP
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,543
Likes: 140
NFL wants Supreme Court look at Sunday Ticket http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28838...d-sunday-ticket
via @ESPN App http://espn.com/app

Michael A. Fletcher

If Baltimore Ravens fans living in Miami want to see a live telecast of their team's game on any given Sunday, the only option is to buy an entire season of DirecTV's NFL Sunday Ticket for $293. The same is true for Eagles fans in Los Angeles, Patriots fans in Chicago, or any NFL fan rooting for a faraway team.

In a world of regional sports networks, satellite television providers and a multitude of streaming platforms, should that be legal? Or would fans be better served if each team, rather than the NFL, decided how to make live telecasts of its games available to the public?

These are among the questions arising from a long-running class-action case that lawyers for the NFL and DirecTV have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review. A decision on whether the high court will take up the case is expected as early as this week.

The litigation could eventually change how out-of-market telecasts are made available to NFL fans, although any final ruling forcing the league's hand is likely years away.

The case does not affect NFL games broadcast on networks that are available over the air -- including Fox, NBC and CBS -- which enjoy a federal antitrust exemption. But it threatens to upend the Sunday Ticket model, and it could also have implications for other NFL games aired exclusively on pay satellite or cable television networks such as ESPN and the NFL Network.

"If the NFL were to lose, I don't think it is necessarily so dramatic in terms of the way you will watch NFL on satellite or cable," said Stefan Szymanski, a sports economist at the University of Michigan. "But it should be good news for consumers because they should be paying less" for out-of-market games.

The legal battle is unfolding even as the Sunday Ticket package, which premiered in 1994, could be in for big changes brought about by evolving technology and consumer tastes. With many fans cutting their cable and satellite TV subscriptions in favor of streaming platforms, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has hinted at breaking up the exclusive, $1.5 billion-a-year Sunday Ticket deal with DirecTV, which expires after the 2022 regular season. "We are looking to see how we can change the delivery," Goodell told Bloomberg in an interview last year. "We want it delivered on several different platforms." An NFL spokesperson declined to comment on the case when contacted by ESPN this week.

NBC News has reported that the league has shopped the package to a variety of streaming platforms, while DirecTV, which is owned by AT&T, has been increasingly wary about the cost of deal. AT&T's chief operating officer told The Wall Street Journal in September that the value derived from the package "has peaked and that a renewal -- especially if it comes with a higher price tag -- will be hard to justify at a time when consumers are canceling pay TV connections." It is also possible for the NFL to follow the lead of other professional sports leagues, including the National Hockey League and Major League Baseball, and offer piecemeal direct-to-consumer viewing options.

In their petition for Supreme Court review, lawyers for the NFL and DirecTV argued that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals erred last August when it reopened a class-action suit alleging that the Sunday Ticket package requires consumers to "pay more for games than they want" and violates federal antitrust statutes.

The law bars competing businesses from working together in a way that limits choices and raises prices for consumers. The appeals court ruling reversed a lower court dismissal of a case brought in 2015 by a group of bars, restaurants and individual fans who bought the Sunday Ticket.

The basic Sunday Ticket package is advertised to individuals at a cost of $293 a season, though the 9th Circuit's opinion said that in 2015, restaurants and bars were charged between $2,300 and $120,000 per season, depending on their capacity. Sunday Ticket subscriptions can be purchased only as a bundle, meaning fans have to buy every game, even if they are interested in watching only one team.

The lawyers who brought the initial case alleged that Sunday Ticket violates federal antitrust provisions because it prevents NFL teams from competing against one another for television viewers of out-of-market games. Under the existing broadcast model, the NFL owns the rights to the games of its 32 teams. The league allows games to be aired in home teams' local markets, while scheduling a limited slate of "free" national broadcasts. The result is that on football Sunday afternoons, no more than three NFL games are aired on broadcast television in a particular market. If fans want to watch a live broadcast of a Sunday afternoon game not being aired locally, they have to watch it on Sunday Ticket.

As those challenging that model see it, consumers like the hypothetical Ravens fans in Miami are being deprived of the possibility that a local Miami television station, a regional sports network or lower-cost streaming platform might air Ravens games -- a prospect that would exist if NFL teams were not banned from producing and selling broadcasts of their own games.

The appeals court ruling would have sent the case back to a lower court for further proceedings. But the NFL and DirecTV are now petitioning the Supreme Court to review that decision.

In that petition, DirecTV and the league argue that NFL games are the product of a joint venture between the teams playing and the NFL itself, and that its control of the distribution of the broadcasts does not amount to an antitrust violation. If the high court chooses not to take the case -- a statistical likelihood because only about 80 of the 8,000 appeal petitions filed each year are accepted by the justices -- the case would be sent back to the federal trial court for a fuller hearing. Meanwhile, pending a final decision on the merits of the case, the NFL and DirecTV may continue to offer the Sunday Ticket package as is.

A third possibility is that the court hears the case and sides with the 9th Circuit, which would impose the 9th Circuit's limitations on permissible joint-venture activity on the rest of the country. The case could also conceivably affect the NFL's cable-only television deals, as well as joint ventures operated by businesses in other industries. Even if that happens, the case would have to return to a trial court to be hashed out.

"The process of litigating that kind of claim is time-consuming and expensive and often results in a pretrial disposition potentially through settlement," said Jodi S. Balsam, a former NFL attorney who is now a professor at Brooklyn Law School. "But we're a long way off from a court ruling that the NFL has to dismantle NFL Sunday Ticket."

The ongoing wrangling over Sunday Ticket in many ways reprises legal battles over broadcast rights waged as the NFL began to emerge as a national sporting passion some 70 years ago. The federal government brought an antitrust complaint against the league in the 1950s in an effort to get the league to loosen its restrictions on broadcast rights.

In 1953, a federal judge concluded that teams could form their own television deals and have their games broadcast into other teams' home cities. Consequently, most NFL teams signed their own television contracts with broadcasters, while the Cleveland Browns launched their own network.

That arrangement changed after the advent of the American Football League, which in 1960 signed a national television contract for all of its games. Congress soon passed legislation that gave the NFL and other major sports leagues limited antitrust protection, which allows them to pool and sell broadcast rights for all their teams. The antitrust exemption, however, covers only games aired on broadcast television. In their petition seeking Supreme Court review, lawyers for the NFL and DirecTV say that, far from limiting fan choices, the Sunday Ticket model has led to increases in fan interest and viewership.


Moreover, their petition argues, the NFL is not just 32 teams in competition but also an "integrated joint venture" whose games and telecasts cannot be produced "without agreements and joint action with every other team."

The argument is that no one team can produce an NFL contest by itself. Instead, the contest has added value because it is part of a league that plays under a set of rules and standards. "The copyrighted telecast is by necessity a collaboration of at least three parties," Balsam said, explaining the league's argument. "The two teams playing the game, with the third party being the league itself."

Michael A. Fletcher is a senior writer for ESPN's Investigative Unit.


Let this sink in..... On 12-31-23 it be will 123123.
On the flip side, you can tune a piano but you can't tune-a-fish.


Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Meh, the NFL and DirecTV might be forced to offer a cheaper 1-team option. Thing is, a person still needs DirecTV to access the service, which is my biggest beef of this whole system. I should be able to simply go to NFL.com and pay for Browns games (or all games, outside of the ones available in my market).

Also, in before a bunch of people claim they haven't paid for the ticket in years because they threaten to cancel their service until it's comped. I'm sure it happens, but I swear EVERY person I know with DirecTV claims it's free every year.


[Linked Image]


“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
I’ve been hoping there’d be a fee for individual teams that you want to watch. IMO that makes it much more appealing


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 375
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 375
Originally Posted By: Punchsmack
Meh, the NFL and DirecTV might be forced to offer a cheaper 1-team option. Thing is, a person still needs DirecTV to access the service, which is my biggest beef of this whole system. I should be able to simply go to NFL.com and pay for Browns games (or all games, outside of the ones available in my market).

Also, in before a bunch of people claim they haven't paid for the ticket in years because they threaten to cancel their service until it's comped. I'm sure it happens, but I swear EVERY person I know with DirecTV claims it's free every year.


I can assure you it’s not free. In all the years I’ve had it I’ve only not paid twice. I’d love to have a one team option to keep my costs down.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,503
Likes: 176
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,503
Likes: 176
I've had Sunday ticket for 5 years and haven't paid at all ever..but its a hassle to do every year and sometimes takes escalating...I wouldn't mind a cheaper one team solution


Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. -John Wayne
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,203
Likes: 586
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,203
Likes: 586
Gamepass, while frustrating at times, has worked pretty well for me, overall. Some folks won't be able to get past watching the game on my phone, or sometimes not having the game at all, but it works for me and my Sundays (following around the little guy as he's playing and/or helping out the wife with whatever she's doing).

What sells it for me is watching games via replay. Being able to watch a game in 45 minutes is awesome.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Originally Posted By: leadtheway
I've had Sunday ticket for 5 years and haven't paid at all ever..but its a hassle to do every year and sometimes takes escalating...I wouldn't mind a cheaper one team solution


I've never paid for Sunday Ticket ever and I've had it for at least ten years.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,423
Likes: 14
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,423
Likes: 14
It all depends on which market you are in !

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
There are Browns fans from all over the country that would greatly benefit from being able to get games ala carte. Having to buy one specific service just for the opportunity to buy all the games in one package that most aren’t going to utilize anyway is too expensive to really warrant. I paid it for 17 years before finally seeing DirectTv price itself out of my market.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,780
Likes: 920
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,780
Likes: 920
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: leadtheway
I've had Sunday ticket for 5 years and haven't paid at all ever..but its a hassle to do every year and sometimes takes escalating...I wouldn't mind a cheaper one team solution


I've never paid for Sunday Ticket ever and I've had it for at least ten years.


Unless you really want and enjoy Direct TV.... AND think it's worth the monthly fees, you paid for it.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,469
Likes: 794
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,469
Likes: 794
NFL.com had pre-season games you could buy and watch on your computer. You can rent movies on your tv.

If I didn't have season tickets I would probably get a dish and get the ticket, but I would use it for maybe9-10 games. I almost always go up for 6 games a season. It isn't worth it for me.

I would gladly welcome the option of paying $15 a game to watch games at home.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Y
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Y
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
NFL.com had pre-season games you could buy and watch on your computer. You can rent movies on your tv.

If I didn't have season tickets I would probably get a dish and get the ticket, but I would use it for maybe9-10 games. I almost always go up for 6 games a season. It isn't worth it for me.

I would gladly welcome the option of paying $15 a game to watch games at home.



When I was in Germany, I could get a weeks pass for 10 euro, which was about 14 dollars at the time. I usually watched it from my slingTV that was hooked up to my house in Columbus, but the weekly pass was great for those weeks they weren't on "locally". The whole season was cheap too.. like 100 or 150 euro. I didn't need that due to my SlingTV.

Went to a browns backers place a couple times and the one time ended up randomly sitting next to a guy that went to my high school that graduated about 6 years after me.


#gmstrong
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum NFL seeks U.S. Supreme Court review of case aimed at Sunday Ticket

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5