The Cleveland Browns and Houston Texans have agreed to the following trade:
Browns receive:
2020 undisclosed draft pick
Texans receive:
RB Duke Johnson Jr.
The Browns currently own their own picks in rounds 1-7 of the 2020 draft. Cleveland also has Arizona’s sixth-round pick (DB Jamar Taylor trade) and Buffalo’s seventh-round pick (WR Corey Coleman trade).
Johnson joined the Browns as a third-round pick in 2015. He appeared in 64 games with 10 starts. He registered 1,286 rushing yards and 2,170 receiving yards on 235 receptions with 13 total touchdowns.
Hope the undisclosed pick is at least a 5th ... i’d be shocked if its not lower unless its conditional and we hav a shot to get it to a 5th based off what Duke does for them ..
Oh well ... he don’t wear brown and orange no more ..
This is about what I expected. I said the goal was a 3rd and no way, no how, do I trade him for worse than a 4th. Really didn't expect someone to "pony up" this soon though.
I hate to see Duke Johnson go because he’s a great character guy and a very good player but the writing was on the wall as soon as we signed Kareem Hunt.
Now we just have to hope Chubb stays healthy until week 8.
I hate to see Duke Johnson go because he’s a great character guy and a very good player but the writing was on the wall as soon as we signed Kareem Hunt.
Now we just have to hope Chubb stays healthy until week 8.
Agreed. I would have preferred to keep him even with Hunt and Chubb on the roster (because I don't expect both of them here together long-term) buthe wanted out and that was abundantly clear. I hope he get's used more in Houston...for Duke's sake.
He'll be a good compliment to Lamar Miller. Miller in the last year of his deal so it's also leverage, going forward, if Duke works out and shoulders part of the load.
And to think people said we would get nothing for him and that is contract was a problem.
I never said we would get nothing for him, but did not think we could expect much. I thought we'd do better getting a player in return.
Based on what the Bears got for Howard, and the fact that Duke has never been a feature back, and the fact he is pretty highly paid for his utilization, I think that a 4th, potentially a 3rd, is quite a haul.
if Duke is catching 55 60 balls a ywar...then your offense isnt any good. I dont understand when people say "he wasnt used right" Duke was limited as a RB. its as simple as that
I had thought of this earlier.... I don't think we need the headache.
Yes, he wants out and is upset with their medical staff, but the subtext has been there all along that he isn't happy with his contract and I don't think we need that, especially from someone who stands no chance of being here beyond three years.
I could see the "healthy scratch" scenario if he already missed a few due to injury... no way they do that six times though. Especially since it would be a punishment to the player and team.
I expect us to bring in another RB sometime soon...in a couple weeks a lot of decent and solid RBs will be on the market soon....which we can use since Hunt is gone for half the season.
The implication that I see is that Duke alone got nearly as many targets as the Texans had in most years, so we can expect his targets to go down as those numbers will still be split among all their RBs.
I think despite what some people thought, Duke's contract was appealing to some teams or at least a team. He's locked up for the next 3 years and you know what you're getting for a 3rd rd pick. Obviously the Texans are all in as well.
We may bring some other guys in to just take a look (should be plenty to choose from), but I'd be very surprised if Hilliard isn't our #2 going into the regular season.
Now D'Ernest's opportunities in preseason mean a lot more.
Hopkins Fuller and KiKi will eat up most of the catches. then you have Lamar Miller. Duke will used but sparingly in Houston
Yep - teams give up 4th round picks for bench warmers all the time.
Good luck Duke ... always thought you were a great contribution to the team and sorry to see you go. Having said that - I think a 4th round pick for him is great for the Browns. If we get a 3rd pick for him I'd think it was a steal. Hope he rips it up for Houston and plays every game!
I liked Duke as a weapon. The problem was obvious last year, everytime he was in the game you knew we were throwing. It made the offense predictable and maybe some of that is on Freddie but we are talking about a running back who has not had 400 yards rushing in a single season.
I loved the idea of bringing him in on 3rd and short, out of shotgun and flexing him out to get a mismatch, but even on his team friendly contract that doesn't justify it. With Hunt in the fold he is just cluttering it up for cheaper, more traditional backs.
I hope he does well in Houston, but that anyone was willing to give a 4th for him is a miracle and I can't be upset. No one trades for running backs.
I'm bummed we couldn't make more use of his obvious talent. He was being a turd towards the end of last year and this off-season, but I understand why and really don't hold it against him. Guy has talent and needs to put it on display if he's gonna get that paycheck. RBs are short shelf life pieces.
Bill OBrian is the del facto GM of the Texans now. Dorsey took him to the cleaners,on this trade.
Oh for sure there is zero doubt you have a lot more football acumen than Bill O'Brien. No doubt in my mind at all.
And catching RB's that see limited snaps but lead various stats for receptions and are active for every game in their career .... for sure a dime a dozen.
The value of the pick was greater than what Duke Johnson was going to give us on the field as a backup. This is a really good trade for us and Duke Johnson but probably not the Texans.
Yes, the King does it again. Fleecing the opposition in trade value. We will take the 4th rounder. Doubt we get the 3rd.
Duke will not see much playing time looking at their rb/wr depth.
He just needs to be active for 10 games. The number of snaps or touches does not mean anything. He was active all 16 games a season while he was here. I don't think they give up a mid round pick for someone they plan on having inactive for 7+ games.
A big injury is the only way I see it staying a 4th.
Personally I really liked Duke Johnson. I always thought of him more of a specialty back, but he doesn't want to be that anymore. So he got his wish, he's gone. Too bad, I'll miss him.
Duke was a reliable RB in a offense closer to a CFL roster. Kizer...Louis give me a break. somebody had to catch check down passes in that offense. funny how 2 RBs in the last few weeks were moved off rosters that caught alot of passes. trust me DJ wasnt exactly installing fear opposing defenses when he was a Brown. if he was all that how come he was never returning kickoffs.?
My first thought was a response from a certain poster who when he heard the Browns might be looking to trade Duke said it was "Stupid."
Some other thoughts:
--It's probably best that Duke was moved. There was the Browns leaking they were looking to trade him; there was his asking for a trade; there was the Baker mouth thing; the hiring of Drew, etc.
--I liked Duke as a player. I disagree w/others in that he wasn't used properly. I thought he was used about perfectly when Pet and Hue were calling the shots. His usage decreased last year under Haley and Freddie. Freddie is still here.
--I'm surprised we got this much in return for Duke. It's almost unheard of. That leads me to this...
--Dorsey is like a predator. He abuses the weak. He took advantage of the moron Gettleman, the chaos in the GB FO last year, the BS between Gase and Landry in Miami, and now a Houston team that doesn't currently have a GM.
KJ did better than he did getting OBJ ... didn’t think that was possible ... *L* ...
Man ... i didn’t wanna trade for OBJ cause i thought he’d cost to much ... then i didn’t wanna trade Duke cause i didn’t think we’d get enough ... now i’m thrilled with both as KJ said ... don’t ever doubt me again .... *L* ...
Not sure how this works ... even though we lost Duke and got nuttin thats gonna help us this year ... somehow i’m Even more pumped up for the season ...
I'd expect we fill in Duke Johnson's roster spot with a veteran back that can come into camp and learn things quickly. Someone like Jacquizz Rodgers or Charcandrick West makes sense.
We also have a bunch of defensive linemen dinged up so I wouldn't be surprised if we brought in someone to that position group.
Duke wanted out so he's out. Works for me. I liked what Baker said. The train is moving, either you want to be aboard or you can get gone. I wish him luck except when they play us but I'm not shedding any tears. He was a moderately good back catching the ball. An every-down runner he was not.
We have Chubb and we have Hunt after the first 8 games. That is one hell of a combo. I'm sure if they think they need another veteran Dorsey will be on the phone tonight about getting one. He is not afraid to make moves.
Good trade. I figured a 4th or 5th....possible 3rd, great move
The terms sound like it is where the Texans finish over what Duke does. If they finish high in the standing, we get a 4th. If they finish low, we get a 3rd.
Yes, the King does it again. Fleecing the opposition in trade value. We will take the 4th rounder. Doubt we get the 3rd.
Duke will not see much playing time looking at their rb/wr depth.
Duke will get plenty of playing time.. Miller had a good year but is getting olde... texans 2nd and 3rd string WRs. Can't stay healthy... I'd be floored if we don't get a third.... only way we do t is if he gets hurt...
If TJ Yeldon is cut from buffalo (has Gore, Singletary, and Shady in front of him) I'm jumping over him...He can run and catch, and ran well considering that Jags line was a mess...plus hes young and doesnt have a lot of tread on his tires. Though I know both him and Fournette were called out for being knuckleheads late in the year when that team was a dumpster fire.
The value of the pick was greater than what Duke Johnson was going to give us on the field as a backup. This is a really good trade for us and Duke Johnson but probably not the Texans.
So many jokes, comments flying around after reading this tweet.
NFL.com's Ian Rapoport reports Keke Coutee has been diagnosed with a "not major" ankle injury.
We can only hope, but we need to wait for additional sources before considering Coutee out of the woods. Coutee did post, then delete, an encouraging update on social media. Even a minor ankle issue could hold Coutee out for the rest of the preseason.
SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter Aug 8, 2019, 10:54 PM ET
This is why trading Duke now was not a good idea, IMO, regardless of compensation. I'd submit that same-ish compensation would have been there if this was done later in the season, just before Hunt returns.
If Chubb goes down, you have next to nobody on the roster that is proven, sans Hunt who is not eligible. Maybe you go out and get an Ajayi or someone like that but I think we're going to see how good Duke really could have been in Houston.
You can’t predict value. What if Johnson plays poorly or gets hurt? I just don’t think his role in the offense was going to be Ethan great as long as Nicks Chubb was healthy.
If Chubb gets hurt we are screwed at running back with or without Duke Johnson.
I predicted, if traded, he should have given us more value than what other people thought we'd get. So I'm ok with also speculating that value would not have changed that much later in the season, even if others disagree.
His usuage went down the tubes in 2018 and still provided a nice return. Pass catching backs, and backs that can block too, have value. Duke fits that mold.
Could his production stink in 2019? I guess, but that is being just as predicitve on that front as I am on 2019 value mid-season.
Theo Riddick just got cut. He's like a poor man's Duke Johnson but it shows where the running back market is it. We got tremendous value for Johnson and had to jump on the deal, it's as simple as that.
10 games active is a walk in the park...Not bad for a backup RB.
Been saying for years that I hoped to see him converted to a WR...wanted him to stay a Brown.
Chubb btw will be a 3 down back and if in great shape like I think, will carry the load. After Hunt is back from suspension he can get a good rest and stay fresh for the post season.
--Dorsey is like a predator. He abuses the weak. He took advantage of the moron Gettleman, the chaos in the GB FO last year, the BS between Gase and Landry in Miami, and now a Houston team that doesn't currently have a GM.
I wasn't very impressed w/Hilliard or the other dude...what's his name? D'Ernest Johnson?
Hilliard did well catching the ball on the first drive, but he was pathetic in pass protection. He had one hold and it should have been two. He held the guy on the one in the first half where the dumb announcer said he did a good job.
The fumble was bad. He didn't look good in-between the tackles on early down carries.
It's just one game, but he is going to have to step it up.
I think Chanderick West or whatever his name would be a good fit in Cleveland.
I don't like the decision to trade Duke. I haven't at any point in this saga. But him not practicing I think backed the Browns into a corner. Sucks all around the way this turned out, IMO.
Are u a conspiracy theorist? ... cause u doubt a lot of things ...
someone asked Freddie about Duke and Freddie got peed and told him in a very stern voice u should never question duke’s professionalism ... and he said that 2 or 3 times with his voice getting more serious and intense each time ..
And i was in the keep duke at least til hunt comes back camp from day 1 ... and i would have been fine keeping him all year as who knows what The future holds ...
I’m also STUNNED and THRILLED at what KJ got for him ..
KJ is pure butter when it comes to trades ..
Owners are gonna start forbidding trades with us ... *LOL* ..
You have a disgruntled player who is not practicing who already doesn't want to be on the team. Unless he was returning to practice soon, I'm wondering if Dorsey was concerned he might not be available for 1 or more of those first 8 games. Then he really loses value to the Browns.
I guess we are still a ways away from the start of the season, but that was more of my thinking behind what I said.
I only have two criticisms of him - he's a little too comfortable with the media, IMO. He carries a little bit of bravado for a guy who hasn't faced much adversity. And two, the blowing a gasket over every little thing is a bit much.
And I always feel like I have to qualify my statements because people don't react too well to criticisms. But I am really happy that Freddie is the coach. I feel the same about Baker. My criticisms of each are rooted in the belief that I don't believe anyone is perfect and everyone is subject to praise and criticism.
I manage a group of people at my job. I have one standout employee. I mean this guy is head and shoulders above the rest. When I see him do something that needs criticism, he gets it just like the rest of my team. I think that's only fair.
--Dorsey is like a predator. He abuses the weak. He took advantage of the moron Gettleman, the chaos in the GB FO last year, the BS between Gase and Landry in Miami, and now a Houston team that doesn't currently have a GM.
This a great observation.
The talking heads in Houston this morning were basically saying with a real gm there's no way texans would have offered a condentional third rounder... they speculated at best it would have been fifth rounder with fourth round condentional... who knows, but I feel that OB was really worried abIt their lack of running back and slot receiver and wasn't no patient enough to get a better price...
Duke is a great fit for the texans but we got great compensation for him
Hilliard did well catching the ball on the first drive, but he was pathetic in pass protection. He had one hold and it should have been two. He held the guy on the one in the first half where the dumb announcer said he did a good job.
Yeah, he hooked his arm completely around the guy and dragged him down. lol I was stunned that a hold wasn't called.
Fortunately, blocking is, for a RB, a largely learned skill. I remember last year when people were freaking out about Chubb's blocking. He managed to get it together.
Last year Duke had 40 carries and 47 catches. I think that Hilliard can manage those carries, which would largely be on 3rd down, with the defense spread out ...... and the catches. Who knows how many catches the RB2 will get this year with our depth at WR? His biggest must have right now is blocking effectively.
Why would you think that? He was a pretty good player for us. Hell, a lot of folks thought he was a great player when they were hell-bent on criticizing a certain coach. LOL
In terms of Freddie’s handling of the media/team so far ... I like that he’s a straight shooter and (to this point at least) has held the line on expectations/commentary. That must stay the same to keep the ship floating the same way it has
And i was in the keep duke at least til hunt comes back camp from day 1 ... and i would have been fine keeping him all year as who knows what The future holds ...
I’m also STUNNED and THRILLED at what KJ got for him ..
I think that was tipping point. I am not sure that we were in a hurry to move Duke, but once that offer came in you have to jump on it before it goes away.
Yeah I too was not impressed by Hilliard in the game although for the most part he was not in with the ONES and the opportunities where not there. He did recognize the blitz but was gosh awful trying to block the blitzer...although he did tackle ok...lol
RBs are all over the place. With the staff that Dorsey has put together we will have the opportunity to pick up a kid from somebody's practice squad if the situation merits it.
We can sign many players that they were impressed with from the draft or UDFA signings that will get cut.
I actually liked the kid Trayone Gray. He might be the only keeper from the bunch. Looks to be one of those GAME DAY Players don't know how he practices. But thought he had the right stuff.
Would like to see him climb up the charts...right now he is dead last...lol
John Dorsey: It was the right time to trade Duke Johnson
Charean Williams,ProFootball Talk on NBC Sports Thu, Aug 8 8:00 PM EDT
The Browns said repeatedly they were not trading Duke Johnson. They traded the running back Thursday.
“I do want to wish Duke the best,” General Manager John Dorsey said on News 5′s pregame show Thursday night, via Nate Ulrich of the Beacon Journal. “With regards to that, we sat; we waited; we were patient; and at the right time, there was a deal on the table that we probably should have taken.”
The Browns made the deal with the Texans despite the fact that they won’t have Kareem Hunt for the first eight games while he serves a suspension. Nick Chubb is the starter, with Dontrell Hilliard, D’Ernest Johnson and undrafted rookies A.J. Ouellette and Trayone Gray fighting to backup Chubb while Hunt is out.
“I’m very comfortable with what we have in the running back room right now, but what we do is we look all the time for all types of players,” Dorsey said. “We will not rest until we find the best 53 we possibly can.”
Considering our needs at RB, I think Charcandrick West would be a good fit. Not sure if he is in shape or anything of that nature. But, he could fill Duke's role for awhile.
I wasn’t overly impressed with D’ernest (SP) despite reading that he’s had a good camp. To me, we need that elusive type back in the 3rd RB role until Hunt returns. Someone with pass catching abilities and shiftiness; I saw Johnston as more of a one cut dude
Duke was overpriced for what his role was in this offense this team isnt going to live or die on who the 3rd RB is. Hillard will eventually learn to pick up blitzes....or not. theres a list of RBs on the street the Browns can sign.
To a lot of people getting a RB on a cheaper salary with the same skill set and getting a mid round draft choice to boot doesn't make sense. That's why Dorsey is in charge and they are posting on a message board.
I wasn't very impressed w/Hilliard or the other dude...what's his name? D'Ernest Johnson?
Hilliard did well catching the ball on the first drive, but he was pathetic in pass protection. He had one hold and it should have been two. He held the guy on the one in the first half where the dumb announcer said he did a good job.
The fumble was bad. He didn't look good in-between the tackles on early down carries.
It's just one game, but he is going to have to step it up.
I think Chanderick West or whatever his name would be a good fit in Cleveland.
I saw the fumble on the goal line. I will actually watch the game tomorrow at 1PM.
Just a question, was Duke a good pass blocker? I am not really sure if this guy is a good pass blocker or not. He did do the things Duke did for this team in the past, but the O is different now. Maybe he does have to step up that part of the game.
I go to games but usually watch when there like I do on TV. I don't focus off ball all that much
And i was in the keep duke at least til hunt comes back camp from day 1 ... and i would have been fine keeping him all year as who knows what The future holds ...
I’m also STUNNED and THRILLED at what KJ got for him ..
I think that was tipping point. I am not sure that we were in a hurry to move Duke, but once that offer came in you have to jump on it before it goes away.
I like this angle best and it makes the most sense. Thanks.
Johnson will now get some valuable training camp reps with his new offense. The Texans will be using Johnson, at minimum, as a pass-catching back, but there's a path to more usage if Lamar Miller struggles. Johnson is an interesting PPR pick in the double-digit rounds while playing in an offense that may be forced to dump off quick passes behind one of the worst offensive lines.
SOURCE: Aaron Wilson on Twitter Aug 20, 2019, 12:09 PM ET
Duke landed in a good spot for him. Lamar is JAG and doesn’t have the pass catching ability ... plus, it’s a fast offense on turf that is looking to get it out quickly
It's odd how we are willing to now openly criticize Duke. For a few years he and JT were our sole bright spots on offense. We loved the man and everything he brought to the team. Now, we cast him aside.
He was a dawg who battled and always did what was asked of him. He did it well AND he did it while being on some truly terrible teams. I hope he does well in Houston, until, of course we play the Texans. Then there will be no remorse.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the Texans made a run at Melvin Gordon now
That would make sense, and continue the pattern Duke had here. Always the #2 guy. When the #1 guy is gone, bring in another guy to be the #1 RB and Duke stays #2.
Yeah, that’s Duke’s area of strength ... he can’t be the lead back. Of course, I’m not sure the Texans are gonna want to pony up the picks/money it’ll take to get Gordon
I think there will be some fine backs available for the Texans and they would cost a lot less than Gordon.
I agree...always seems to be some solid-good backs scraped aside around these times...as long as they can find a compliment to Duke, I think they'll be ok.
Without starting a new thread ... I just alluded to this in the Chubb thread, but it’s something I thougth about during the Rams game.
Do we miss Duke Johnson’s presence a little bit? He was a steady player for quite a while here ... reliable, good hands, versatile, etc. He was almost a safety valve for the QB (especially now since we don’t have that reliable TE threat to help Baker).
I didn’t think we’d miss him that much, but I’m starting to think we are.
Without starting a new thread ... I just alluded to this in the Chubb thread, but it’s something I thougth about during the Rams game.
Do we miss Duke Johnson’s presence a little bit? He was a steady player for quite a while here ... reliable, good hands, versatile, etc. He was almost a safety valve for the QB (especially now since we don’t have that reliable TE threat to help Baker).
I didn’t think we’d miss him that much, but I’m starting to think we are.
IMHO, Chubb can do what Duke did but better...
With the reliance in shot-gun formations, I don't think there was too much space for Duke,nor that we miss him.
Not until the team let him go, or he held out, he was under contract and
always contributed well in the past, I can only surmise he would have continued to contribute well, as players in a contract year do, imagine what a player in a (week 10 suspension ends timeframe) of the guy well everybody knows the situation,
no reason to think Duke wouldn't have been extra motivated to showcase his game for his future role elsewhere, even if he was convinced he would be out, even the "instatnt" they could get Hunt into uniform.
Timing is all. There are no perfect answers, just decisions and living with them. The team did, and moving on.
I think we miss him, but mostly because of the absence of Higgins and (to a lesser extent) Njoku. If we had Hunt right now, I don't think we'd miss him at all.
It was over for Duke Johnson here the moment Baker Mayfield called him out:
Mary Kay Cabot Updated Aug 08, 2019; Posted Aug 08, 2019 12
CLEVELAND, Ohio — The moment Baker Mayfield walked up to the podium at minicamp in June and called out Duke Johnson, it was over for the running back in Cleveland.
Once you’ve lost your franchise quarterback, you’re done.
The six-month-long saga ended Thursday with Johnson being traded to the Texans on Thursday for a fourth-round pick in 2020 that can become a third if he’s active for 10 games, which is highly likely.
Mayfield is The Franchise, and almost everything in Browns Town is geared towards supporting him. Hiring Freddie Kitchens was all about Mayfield. The two developed a bond and Mayfield trusts him implicitly. The Browns made the blockbuster trade for Odell Beckham Jr. to give Mayfield a dangerous weapon. They signed Kareem Hunt in large part to give him another.
They signed third-string quarterback Garrett Gilbert in part because he and Mayfield are longtime family friends from Austin’s Lake Travis High School. Rashard Higgins has new life here because of his good friend Mayfield.
If Mayfield is no longer in your corner, it’s time for a change of scenery.
When Johnson took the podium on the first day of minicamp and said there was nothing the Browns could do to mend the fences and that he still wanted out, Mayfield listened in from the back, shaking his head.
By that time, Mayfield had spent the entire offseason grinding it out with Nick Chubb and Dontrell Hilliard, and he had no use for a player who wasn’t all in. So when he stepped up to the mic, he let Johnson have it, saying his plight with the Browns was “self-inflicted” and that “he better do his job.”
That day, the husband of Johnson’s former agent Kristin Campbell, tweeted legendary 2 Live Crew rapper Luther Campbell, clapped back at Mayfield on Twitter.
“F— Baker Mayfield for saying that dumb s--- about Duke Johnson,” he tweeted. “I guarantee you be the one to divide this locker room up. You are not in Texas at Cracker Barrel.”
The flap was more of a distraction than the Browns needed, especially for a player who had been steadily falling out of favor with the club. Day one of Cleveland Browns' minicamp
Duke Johnson and the Browns have reached the point of no return
It's time for the Browns to trade Johnson and eliminate the distraction.
Mayfield’s remarks also prompted some of Johnson’s best friends on the team to discuss in a players-only setting the unwritten rules of getting in a teammate’s business.
“I think we were just bringing each other together as a team,’’ linebacker Christian Kirskey told cleveland.com on July 29. “That’s all it was. It’s no problem.’’
Mayfield seemed to get the message, and by the time camp opened July 25, he said of he and Johnson “we’re good.”
But Mayfield’s remarks were indicative of how the organization felt about Johnson. The club’s faith in the 2015 third-round pick began to erode last season when he got off on the wrong foot with former offensive coordinator Todd Haley and his touches decreased considerably.
In October, he told cleveland.com, "I don’t think these games have to be as hard as they are. I think I can help this team win given more opportunities.''
Johnson frustrated by his lack of chances
Johnson got his head on straight Wednesday after chatting with the teammate who was briefly the starting quarterback.
Johnson’s playing time didn’t improve under Freddie Kitchens, and by the end of the season, his touches had decreased from 156 in 2017 to 87 in 2018. But things really went south when Browns GM John Dorsey signed Kareem Hunt in February and proclaimed that Johnson wasn’t expendable “yet.”
Johnson asked to be traded shortly thereafter, and the wheels went in motion for the trade that took place on Thursday.
Despite the Browns’ public proclamations that Johnson would be a large and valuable part of the offense in 2019, the reality was always that they’d trade him if they got the right offer — a third- or fourth-round pick.
Considering that Johnson has played in all 16 games in each of his first four seasons, the Browns are likely to get the third-rounder — a considerable haul for a running back these days.
Johnson and Mayfield got what they wanted too. Johnson got the change of scenery he’s wanted since February, and Mayfield, in bid to win a championship, no longer has a player on his offense that doesn’t want to be here.
Do you actually READ the articles you post that have these ridiculous headlines?
THIS is about as opposite a paragraph that can be written when compared to the headline:
"Despite the Browns’ public proclamations that Johnson would be a large and valuable part of the offense in 2019, the reality was always that they’d trade him if they got the right offer — a third- or fourth-round pick."
Well, MKC stated that Johnson demanded a trade as soon as Hunt was signed, and that he would be traded as soon as the right offer came along. Also that Baker's comments were indicative of how the Browns felt about DJ. MKC contradicted herself between the first paragraph and those statements.
However, Duke was a very good receiver out of the backfield or from the line, either way, and Baker could use a good safety valve, with Njoku and Higgins injured.
However, Duke was a very good receiver out of the backfield or from the line, either way, and Baker could use a good safety valve, with Njoku and Higgins injured.
He could use one, but I'm not sure he's mature enough to see it. By the time the play is ripe -- he's already looking way downfield for the big play.
However, Duke was a very good receiver out of the backfield or from the line, either way, and Baker could use a good safety valve, with Njoku and Higgins injured.
this was my thought, too ... not that Duke is some sort of huge game changer, just that he was a reliable guy near the line for Baker to check to
I hate to keep bringing back this thread, but I’ve mentioned it a few times so far through 6 weeks. And last week’s turnover in the KEY part of the game to Hilliard made me immediately think: “What if that was Duke Jonson?” I still contend that we miss him to some degree. I think he was a safety valve and a reliable player ... and let’s be honest, it seems like our O is missing that reliable type threat. Yes, we have talent and yes Duke intimated that he didn’t want to be here ... but, I think he would have had a role and would have helped
Forcing players to stay somewhere they don't want to be is not a good look. We got a lot for Duke. In the long run it is more valuable to have the good will of players we may wish to sign in the future than anything we may have gained by forcing Duke to stay here for the short term.
I hate to keep bringing back this thread, but I’ve mentioned it a few times so far through 6 weeks. And last week’s turnover in the KEY part of the game to Hilliard made me immediately think: “What if that was Duke Jonson?” I still contend that we miss him to some degree. I think he was a safety valve and a reliable player ... and let’s be honest, it seems like our O is missing that reliable type threat. Yes, we have talent and yes Duke intimated that he didn’t want to be here ... but, I think he would have had a role and would have helped
This will be moot in 2 weeks.. Because Hunt replaces hilliard and Hunt is better at running/receiving than Johnson.
I hate to keep bringing back this thread, but I’ve mentioned it a few times so far through 6 weeks. And last week’s turnover in the KEY part of the game to Hilliard made me immediately think: “What if that was Duke Jonson?” I still contend that we miss him to some degree. I think he was a safety valve and a reliable player ... and let’s be honest, it seems like our O is missing that reliable type threat. Yes, we have talent and yes Duke intimated that he didn’t want to be here ... but, I think he would have had a role and would have helped
This will be moot in 2 weeks.. Because Hunt replaces hilliard and Hunt is better at running/receiving than Johnson.
yeah I agree .. problem is it MAY have already cost us one game. And to me, one game victory in a potential playoff year is worth more than a mid round pick
I hate to keep bringing back this thread, but I’ve mentioned it a few times so far through 6 weeks. And last week’s turnover in the KEY part of the game to Hilliard made me immediately think: “What if that was Duke Jonson?” I still contend that we miss him to some degree. I think he was a safety valve and a reliable player ... and let’s be honest, it seems like our O is missing that reliable type threat. Yes, we have talent and yes Duke intimated that he didn’t want to be here ... but, I think he would have had a role and would have helped
This will be moot in 2 weeks.. Because Hunt replaces hilliard and Hunt is better at running/receiving than Johnson.
4 weeks. Hunt will return in two weeks but will not play until week 10.
Kareem Hunt underwent sports-hernia surgery on Thursday morning. It's a 4-6 week timeline, so Hunt should make a full recovery prior to his return to action in Week 10. He won't be permitted to be at the Browns' facilities during his suspension. Nick Chubb could work as the offense's featured back for the entire season with a strong first half, regardless of whether or not Hunt is in game shape come November. Chubb averaged 17.5 rush attempts and 2.9 targets per game in 2018 during his time as a starter while splitting snaps with Duke Johnson, so it's tough to imagine him ever taking a complete backseat in this backfield. Hunt is little more than a late-round stash in redraft leagues. Dominate with our Draft Guide: Check out our running back projections!
His suspension is up after game 8, but there must be some rule about him needing to practice or condition because several articles I've read say he won't play until week 10. I'm also not sure if this is Browns game 10 or week 10 which would include the bye week.
Browns running back Kareem Hunt will be heard from this fantasy season and should be able to help your team down the stretch if you’re still in the playoff mix.
Hunt is set to return to the Browns after Cleveland’s Week 8 game against the Patriots. The rest of Cleveland’s schedule is pretty easy after Week 8 as they’ll play the Broncos, Steelers (twice), Dolphins, Bengals and Cardinals (twice). Their two toughest games in the second half of the season, against the Bills and Ravens, are both at home.
Maybe they mean 'week 10' of the season, which would mean our game #8 is played in week 9 of the season and he would return week 10. That might be why I'm confused.
During his suspension, Hunt will miss games against the Titans, Jets, Rams, Ravens, 49ers, Seahawks, Patriots, and Broncos. He'll be eligible to return to the field for the team's Week 10 game against the Bills. Prior to that, the backfield workload will presumably fall to Nick Chubb, who had an excellent rookie season in 2018 and has seen both of his prior backfield competitors (Carlos Hyde and Duke Johnson) traded in the past year
I hate to keep bringing back this thread, but I’ve mentioned it a few times so far through 6 weeks. And last week’s turnover in the KEY part of the game to Hilliard made me immediately think: “What if that was Duke Jonson?” I still contend that we miss him to some degree. I think he was a safety valve and a reliable player ... and let’s be honest, it seems like our O is missing that reliable type threat. Yes, we have talent and yes Duke intimated that he didn’t want to be here ... but, I think he would have had a role and would have helped
This will be moot in 2 weeks.. Because Hunt replaces hilliard and Hunt is better at running/receiving than Johnson.
yeah I agree .. problem is it MAY have already cost us one game. And to me, one game victory in a potential playoff year is worth more than a mid round pick
Browns RBs NOT named Nick Chubb are averaging barely 3 touches per game combined.. Hilliard is averaging 1 touch per game..
So this begs several questions: If DJ was here and getting all of those touches, what would his attitude be getting 3 touches per game?
If DJ got more touches, they would almost have to take away touches from Chubb, who everybody thinks should get MORE touches, not less. Do we want to take touches away from Chubb?
Why did we have a guy getting 1 touch per game and who has *checks notes* 0 catches this season as the primary read on a key drive to potentially win the game?
I wonder if he's still frustrated being stuck behind the "bell cow" Carlos Hyde. Together they provide a formidable attack but Duke has been getting about 25% of the carries.
"Not provided the kind of production" and "under-utilized" are still the terms that are following him, week after week, season after season.
I was a big fan of Duke. That said - with Freddie Brain Fart Kitchens calling the games the way he did vs SEA and LA ... I really don't know that having him was going to make a difference. We had more than enough talent on the team - it was the HC and OC performance that killed us. A 3rd round for Duke? That's good business.
Duke might've helped us while Hunt was out. We can hypothetical this to death, but as someone who wasn't all in on the hype, I'm still applauding the long-term move.
Duke might've helped us while Hunt was out. We can hypothetical this to death, but as someone who wasn't all in on the hype, I'm still applauding the long-term move.
I was totally against trading Duke Johnson but getting a third back for him is insane value.
Duke might've helped us while Hunt was out. We can hypothetical this to death, but as someone who wasn't all in on the hype, I'm still applauding the long-term move.
I was totally against trading Duke Johnson but getting a third back for him is insane value.
Yeah, I liked Duke and wanted to keep him as long as we could but in the end, this is a pretty sweet payback for us.
Duke might've helped us while Hunt was out. We can hypothetical this to death, but as someone who wasn't all in on the hype, I'm still applauding the long-term move.
I was totally against trading Duke Johnson but getting a third back for him is insane value.
I was a Duke fan as well.
And, under the best circumstances he wouldve been like hunt and given us a couple more 3rd down conversions each game. That sounds wonderful, but I'd trade a third in this next draft.
Duke might've helped us while Hunt was out. We can hypothetical this to death, but as someone who wasn't all in on the hype, I'm still applauding the long-term move.
I was totally against trading Duke Johnson but getting a third back for him is insane value.
Yeah, I liked Duke and wanted to keep him as long as we could but in the end, this is a pretty sweet payback for us.
Excellent return.
I look at it this way. Prior to Hunts return, would Duke have impacted a game enough to help win one of the losses? Maybe, but probably not.
Duke might've helped us while Hunt was out. We can hypothetical this to death, but as someone who wasn't all in on the hype, I'm still applauding the long-term move.
I was totally against trading Duke Johnson but getting a third back for him is insane value.
Yeah, I liked Duke and wanted to keep him as long as we could but in the end, this is a pretty sweet payback for us.
Excellent return.
I look at it this way. Prior to Hunts return, would Duke have impacted a game enough to help win one of the losses? Maybe, but probably not.
That's kinda what I was getting at. Our offense was such a mess, would we have taken advantage of his skills?
I liked Duke a good deal and didn't know what Hunt might bring in this offense as called (we named the eight failed FK calls that were point-blank at the goal line, all failures this: "Fred Right 88.") Hope we see this tandem backfield a bunch.
In 2017 Hunt had 1,327 rushing yards and 455 receiving yards with 11 tds.
In 2018, in 11 games, Hunt had 824 yards rushing and 378 receiving with 14 tds.
Duke Johnson is not and will never be Kareem Hunt.
In 10 games, Nick Chubb has 1011 yards and 6 TDs.
Doesn't really matter, but I just like giving his stat line. I said before the year that Chubb was just as good if not better than Kareem and people said I was nuts.
Nice return for Duke. Not sure how much Hilliard was being utilized and that with Duke here getting those reps there would have been different outcomes. I was hoping to trade Duke right before the trade deadline as in down to the wire so we only would miss a few games until Hunt became activated. But you can't always have it perfect for you.
He's a player we would not have pursued and would not be earning that 2nd contract. Unless as I had expressed many times, we made him into a WR instead of RB...Higgins, hurt, Njoku hurt. Duke would have been able to bring a toughness to the WR corp as he would have been a WR with a RB body and skill set to run after the catch YAC against small DBs.
All in all that was not going to happen - Duke even asked for that position change once??? The 3rd round pick was a good exchange for Duke. Safety, OL, TE...would be a good spot to take one of them!
Nice return for Duke. Not sure how much Hilliard was being utilized and that with Duke here getting those reps there would have been different outcomes. I was hoping to trade Duke right before the trade deadline as in down to the wire so we only would miss a few games until Hunt became activated. But you can't always have it perfect for you.
He's a player we would not have pursued and would not be earning that 2nd contract. Unless as I had expressed many times, we made him into a WR instead of RB...Higgins, hurt, Njoku hurt. Duke would have been able to bring a toughness to the WR corp as he would have been a WR with a RB body and skill set to run after the catch YAC against small DBs.
All in all that was not going to happen - Duke even asked for that position change once??? The 3rd round pick was a good exchange for Duke. Safety, OL, TE...would be a good spot to take one of them!
jmho
We probably win the Seahawks game if we have Duke instead of Hilliard, making us 5-5 in a much better position to make the playoffs. Also might've beat the Broncos, but that's wishful thinking.
How quickly people forget all the great clutch 3rd down grabs Duke made for us.
Duke:
Hilliard:
But hey, a 3rd rounder!
I don't blame Dorsey, Duke wanted a bigger role and Kitchens wasn't giving it to him so Dorsey got what he could, but man I really like Duke Johnson.
It's a moot point now that Hunt is back, but we def were missing a dump off receiving RB threat for the first 9 games.
Nice return for Duke. Not sure how much Hilliard was being utilized and that with Duke here getting those reps there would have been different outcomes. I was hoping to trade Duke right before the trade deadline as in down to the wire so we only would miss a few games until Hunt became activated. But you can't always have it perfect for you.
He's a player we would not have pursued and would not be earning that 2nd contract. Unless as I had expressed many times, we made him into a WR instead of RB...Higgins, hurt, Njoku hurt. Duke would have been able to bring a toughness to the WR corp as he would have been a WR with a RB body and skill set to run after the catch YAC against small DBs.
All in all that was not going to happen - Duke even asked for that position change once??? The 3rd round pick was a good exchange for Duke. Safety, OL, TE...would be a good spot to take one of them!
jmho
We probably win the Seahawks game if we have Duke instead of Hilliard, making us 5-5 in a much better position to make the playoffs. Also might've beat the Broncos, but that's wishful thinking.
How quickly people forget all the great clutch 3rd down grabs Duke made for us.
Duke:
Hilliard:
But hey, a 3rd rounder!
I don't blame Dorsey, Duke wanted a bigger role and Kitchens wasn't giving it to him so Dorsey got what he could, but man I really like Duke Johnson.
It's a moot point now that Hunt is back, but we def were missing a dump off receiving RB threat for the first 9 games.
none of this matters.
Duke requested to be traded.
He was gone anyway. I'm glad we got someting for him.
A third rounder for a RB like Duke (as great as he was for us) is amazing. I applaud Dorsey for squeezing a 3rd out of a team for a guy that everyone knew was practically out the door. A 3rd is a big deal.
But I loved Duke too. It's very tempting to play the 'what-if' game with our losses. I'll put it out there, I bet we win the Rams game. That's one game that sticks out to me because we were oh so close. You switch a couple plays around here and there (especially 3rd downs) and you're talking about adding a score or a FG for us or even taking away points from them. One key guy might've swung that game around. Not sure about the rest, though. As I've said before in other threads, the RB corps is way way down the list of issues with this team.
[quote=eotab][color:#FFCC33]j/c... I don't blame Dorsey, Duke wanted a bigger role and Kitchens wasn't giving it to him so Dorsey got what he could, but man I really like Duke Johnson.
It's a moot point now that Hunt is back, but we def were missing a dump off receiving RB threat for the first 9 games.
none of this matters.
Duke requested to be traded.
He was gone anyway. I'm glad we got someting for him.
I said in my post it wasn't Dorsey's fault because Duke asked to be traded, BUT the reason he asked to be traded is because he wasn't being used.
I'd rather have 1-2 more wins right now than a 3rd rounder, but if people don't feel that way oh well, moot point now anyways.
A third rounder for a RB like Duke (as great as he was for us) is amazing. I applaud Dorsey for squeezing a 3rd out of a team for a guy that everyone knew was practically out the door. A 3rd is a big deal.
But I loved Duke too. It's very tempting to play the 'what-if' game with our losses. I'll put it out there, I bet we win the Rams game. That's one game that sticks out to me because we were oh so close. You switch a couple plays around here and there (especially 3rd downs) and you're talking about adding a score or a FG for us or even taking away points from them. One key guy might've swung that game around. Not sure about the rest, though. As I've said before in other threads, the RB corps is way way down the list of issues with this team.
It's way down the list NOW, cuz Hunt is back. I'd trade any future 3rd round pick for 1 win when "in the hunt" any time.
I disagree. RB probably didn't crack the top 10 list of issues with the team in those first 9 games.
Things like Freddie's playcalling, team discipline, Baker's regression, DB injuries, and the Online struggling with pass protection eclipsed any issue of who we were throwing out there at RB.
Would Duke have helped? Sure, but you're talking about a couple extra third down conversions. Who knows, maybe we win the Rams game. That's all I see the needle moving with Duke.
The entire secondary was out for the Rams game - maybe if Duke could lace 'em up and play safety? He definitely wasn't changing Freddie's mind with his 1st and goal = 4 straight passes to end the game. I really don't think we've ever missed Duke, our offense was in a total state of "discombobulation" the first eight games... He wasn't fixing that.
I disagree. RB probably didn't crack the top 10 list of issues with the team in those first 9 games.
Things like Freddie's playcalling, team discipline, Baker's regression, DB injuries, and the Online struggling with pass protection eclipsed any issue of who we were throwing out there at RB.
Would Duke have helped? SureMAYBE, but you're talking about a couple extra third down conversions. Who knows, maybe we win the Rams game - And most probably not. That's all I see the needle moving with Duke.
I agree (with a couple of changes). We could of had Jim Brown in his prime in the backfield - and the play-calling, discipline and QB regression would have still prevented us from winning games we 'in theory' could have won. Duke was not going to be a differentiator. jmo
j/c I don't think that there is a single outcome this season that Duke would have changed. He's good, and a great guy to have, but he is quite literally NOT a game-changer.
This enigma that is Duke Johnson just continues to roll along. Texans fans up in arms... "Why isn't he getting touches?" "Why do we keep running him up the middle?" Duke had a beautiful 19 yard run against the Colts Thursday. Jumped up with his usual why aren't you getting me the ball demeanor. The rest of the night was 4 carries for 3 yards.
Duke has three catches for 12 yards in the last two games. "He's known as one of the best receivers out of the backfield. Why aren't we throwing him the ball??"
Welcome to the club, Texans fans, we don't know either.
According to some of our fans, several HC's, now with two different teams, have no idea of how to use the great and wonderful talent that is Duke Johnson. And the saga continues......
It's always a good thing to defer to Mike Pettine, Hue Jackson, and Bill O'Brien when referencing how a player is used effectively. I mean, these are some of the best.
j/c I don't think that there is a single outcome this season that Duke would have changed. He's good, and a great guy to have, but he is quite literally NOT a game-changer.
The Seattle game. I made a post a couple pages ago.
The Hilliard drop that led to the game ending INT, turns into 6+ yard gain with Duke.
According to some of our fans, several HC's, now with two different teams, have no idea of how to use the great and wonderful talent that is Duke Johnson. And the saga continues......
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
According to some of our fans, several HC's, now with two different teams, have no idea of how to use the great and wonderful talent that is Duke Johnson. And the saga continues......
Don’t know how to use him?
He led the league in RB receptions for 3 year period under Pettine/Hue. Just Kitchens couldn’t figure it out, but he can’t seem to figure out the most basic stuff.
The short memory/revisionist history of so many people on this thread is shocking to me.
The short memory/revisionist history of so many people on this thread is shocking to me.
And the fact that so many people still talk about Duke Johnson is shocking to me.
That's odd. It's directly relevant to today. 3rd round draft pick. Loss of games. Why wouldn't we talk about him?
Just in the context of "we'd have won if he were here for this" talk. He was here - for quite awhile - we never won. I'm happy for a 3rd rounder and I sincerely hope to be done with Duketalkers forever.
The short memory/revisionist history of so many people on this thread is shocking to me.
And the fact that so many people still talk about Duke Johnson is shocking to me.
That's odd. It's directly relevant to today. 3rd round draft pick. Loss of games. Why wouldn't we talk about him?
I'd rather have the 3rd rounder and draft a player that wants to actually play for the Browns vs someone who demanded a trade.
If you read any of the news about him... he is pedestrian and the Browns fleeced the Texans.
We fleeced them because guys like Duke are apparently a dime a dozen because... ????
The guy has the talent and belongs at the NFL level. At the end of the day, you make trades to acquire more talent (either short term or longer term). You don't make trades so you can run back to your charts and graphs to see if you 'won' the trade.
I loved having Duke here, but man that RB was crowded and we now have an additional pick where we should be able to get an NFL talent at another position without hurting our overall RB talent that much. Yes, we could've used him earlier this season, but smart money says he probably doesn't affect the outcome of any of those games, and wouldn't have affected our main issues.
Yeah, he's at most a third down back with a back up role everywhere he's been. How did we ever let him get away?
Not everyone who wears a Browns uniform is a superstar. And Duke fits well within that description.
He. Led. The. League. In. Pass. Catches. For. A. RB. Over. 3. Year. Period.
Ya know what, I give up, it seems like nobody is actually reading or paying attention to facts. Just stating how much they don't want to talk about someone by coming to a thread to talk about them.
Not you specifically PitDAWG, just clicked on your post since it was the last in the thread.
I haven't been reading this thread, mostly, before today.
I wonder if the Browns had held on to Duke Johnson from the start of the season, among other things, if it would not have led to the Browns having won a couple more games and led to them being above the playoff cutoff at this point in the season.
I haven't been reading this thread, mostly, before today.
I wonder if the Browns had held on to Duke Johnson from the start of the season, among other things, if it would not have led to the Browns having won a couple more games and led to them being above the playoff cutoff at this point in the season.
For that to have happened - and for Duke to have been the difference - we'd have been relying on: = Freddie being a better OC than he was in the games we lost but *could* have won = Freddie being a better HC = Baker not having regressed so badly that he was throwing everything too hard and mostly inaccurately = The OL was playing better than it was
I don't see it. I was a huge Duke fan, loved how he always made the first tackler miss .... but he didn't want to be here and with the 4 factors above and some other issues with the team as well, I don't see how anyone thinks Duke was going to be the difference maker. Is he better than Hilliard? By miles yes, was that what decided those games? No.
I haven't been reading this thread, mostly, before today.
I wonder if the Browns had held on to Duke Johnson from the start of the season, among other things, if it would not have led to the Browns having won a couple more games and led to them being above the playoff cutoff at this point in the season.
I haven't been reading this thread, mostly, before today.
I wonder if the Browns had held on to Duke Johnson from the start of the season, among other things, if it would not have led to the Browns having won a couple more games and led to them being above the playoff cutoff at this point in the season.
For that to have happened - and for Duke to have been the difference - we'd have been relying on: = Freddie being a better OC than he was in the games we lost but *could* have won = Freddie being a better HC = Baker not having regressed so badly that he was throwing everything too hard and mostly inaccurately = The OL was playing better than it was
I don't see it. I was a huge Duke fan, loved how he always made the first tackler miss .... but he didn't want to be here and with the 4 factors above and some other issues with the team as well, I don't see how anyone thinks Duke was going to be the difference maker. Is he better than Hilliard? By miles yes, was that what decided those games? No.
I just don't like thinking the only thing keeping the 2019 Browns out of the playoffs is they are a Jabril Peppers away, or a Danny Shelton/ Trevon Coley either or, away;
or they are a Breshard Perriman plus Higgans and Callaway being ready and able all year, away,
or they are just an Emmanuel Ogbah and or Nassib and Seth DeValve away,
or they are an undoing of the one for one swap of last years tight end for Harris at tight end this year away,
from having played better as a group, enough,
maybe just enough to not start out 0-1 in the opener vs the titans, or maybe just get a play here or 5 game minutes of momentum there against the Seahawks, ie. or the Rams
from really being in the drivers seat of the playoff race, instead of the,
well instead of hoping the Ravens suddenly lose 3 outa 4 to have a legitimate shot.
I just want people to consider one thing about the "horrible play calling".
Some people are assuming that we are running exactly the same offense as last year ... and we are not.
Last year's offense was Haley's offense, with some Kitchen mixed in after Freddie became OC.
This year's offense is a Bruce Arians based offense. It is a different offense, from the calls on up.
Now, if this is our long term head coach, and our long term offensive scheme, (and the defensive side, as well) then is it horrible if we struggled at 1st, as players learn the offense, and we have dealt with some difficult injuries? We have seen some confusion, with players not in the right spot.
This seems to be improving with time and experience. Some might say we have played easier defenses, but the Bills and Steelers are both respectable on that side of the ball.
No matter how this season turns out, I hope we keep the schemes and coaches in place, so we can go into the next season without players having to start over yet again.
We are to cute when the plays don't work. We are hero's when they do.
Just remember all plays are successful when the execution of them is perfect.
We have a very low success rate on gadget plays.. which is why there is the frustration... we are marching the ball down the field just fine then run a gadget play and lose yardage or do something stupid.. if things are working, just keep doing them until they aren't working any more.
We are to cute when the plays don't work. We are hero's when they do.
Just remember all plays are successful when the execution of them is perfect.
We have a very low success rate on gadget plays.. which is why there is the frustration... we are marching the ball down the field just fine then run a gadget play and lose yardage or do something stupid.. if things are working, just keep doing them until they aren't working any more.
We are to cute when the plays don't work. We are hero's when they do.
Just remember all plays are successful when the execution of them is perfect.
We have a very low success rate on gadget plays.. which is why there is the frustration... we are marching the ball down the field just fine then run a gadget play and lose yardage or do something stupid.. if things are working, just keep doing them until they aren't working any more.
Yet almost every team does the same thing. You know damn well that if we never ran any trick or gadget plays that the fans would have been crying and screaming about that.
We are to cute when the plays don't work. We are hero's when they do.
Just remember all plays are successful when the execution of them is perfect.
We have a very low success rate on gadget plays.. which is why there is the frustration... we are marching the ball down the field just fine then run a gadget play and lose yardage or do something stupid.. if things are working, just keep doing them until they aren't working any more.
Yet almost every team does the same thing. You know damn well that if we never ran any trick or gadget plays that the fans would have been crying and screaming about that.
Just score a TD or FG on every offensive series and the rest will tend to itself.
We are to cute when the plays don't work. We are hero's when they do.
Just remember all plays are successful when the execution of them is perfect.
We have a very low success rate on gadget plays.. which is why there is the frustration... we are marching the ball down the field just fine then run a gadget play and lose yardage or do something stupid.. if things are working, just keep doing them until they aren't working any more.
I agree with you 100%. The frustration of the fans when this happens is heard and felt. The success of gadget plays is a result of timing as much as execution.
However, IMO FK all-too-often tries to outsmart the opponent in getting away from what the opponent has been unable to stop. There is a fine line from making 'making them prove they can stop you' and 'becoming predictable'. At times this year we have failed at BOTH of those issues. No matter what we do and how well we do it, we look clunky almost all the time.
Nice return for Duke. Not sure how much Hilliard was being utilized and that with Duke here getting those reps there would have been different outcomes. I was hoping to trade Duke right before the trade deadline as in down to the wire so we only would miss a few games until Hunt became activated. But you can't always have it perfect for you.
He's a player we would not have pursued and would not be earning that 2nd contract. Unless as I had expressed many times, we made him into a WR instead of RB...Higgins, hurt, Njoku hurt. Duke would have been able to bring a toughness to the WR corp as he would have been a WR with a RB body and skill set to run after the catch YAC against small DBs.
All in all that was not going to happen - Duke even asked for that position change once??? The 3rd round pick was a good exchange for Duke. Safety, OL, TE...would be a good spot to take one of them!
jmho
We probably win the Seahawks game if we have Duke instead of Hilliard, making us 5-5 in a much better position to make the playoffs. Also might've beat the Broncos, but that's wishful thinking.
How quickly people forget all the great clutch 3rd down grabs Duke made for us.
Duke:
Hilliard:
But hey, a 3rd rounder!
I don't blame Dorsey, Duke wanted a bigger role and Kitchens wasn't giving it to him so Dorsey got what he could, but man I really like Duke Johnson.
It's a moot point now that Hunt is back, but we def were missing a dump off receiving RB threat for the first 9 games.
none of this matters.
Duke requested to be traded.
He was gone anyway. I'm glad we got someting for him.
We'd have won more games if Hunt were available all year...
We are to cute when the plays don't work. We are hero's when they do.
Just remember all plays are successful when the execution of them is perfect.
We have a very low success rate on gadget plays.. which is why there is the frustration... we are marching the ball down the field just fine then run a gadget play and lose yardage or do something stupid.. if things are working, just keep doing them until they aren't working any more.
Our offense is still a work in progress. Earlier in the year, the gadget plays were the only plays that were working.
And yet he is on pace to surpass all his production from 2018 in total yards, TDs, and avg. per catch/rush. All simply by being used more efficiently and effectively.
He is a role playing RB. Not a starter. Never has been and never will be. But some people seem to really get into that type of thing. Some of you make him sound like the second coming of Jim Brown. He was replaced with a much better and more proven player. People should quit carrying on about the inferior back we had before Hunt.
We actually upgraded and people still keep droning on.
He is a role playing RB. Not a starter. Never has been and never will be. But some people seem to really get into that type of thing. Some of you make him sound like the second coming of Jim Brown. He was replaced with a much better and more proven player. People should quit carrying on about the inferior back we had before Hunt.
We actually upgraded and people still keep droning on.
You are right, that hunt is better than Duke, no argument there.
But I would say that trading duke has cost us AT least 1 game this year (sea I think it was when Hillard dropped an easy catch into the hands of a defender), which at this moment, could very well cost us the playoffs.
If we had the choice to keep duke this year, and make the playoffs - or trade duke for a 3rd (I think that's what we got) and not make the playoffs. Give me the playoffs.
He is a role playing RB. Not a starter. Never has been and never will be. But some people seem to really get into that type of thing. Some of you make him sound like the second coming of Jim Brown. He was replaced with a much better and more proven player. People should quit carrying on about the inferior back we had before Hunt.
We actually upgraded and people still keep droning on.
You are right, that hunt is better than Duke, no argument there.
But I would say that trading duke has cost us AT least 1 game this year (sea I think it was when Hillard dropped an easy catch into the hands of a defender), which at this moment, could very well cost us the playoffs.
If we had the choice to keep duke this year, and make the playoffs - or trade duke for a 3rd (I think that's what we got) and not make the playoffs. Give me the playoffs.
To me .. The way the TEAM played in the Tennessee game .. and the 49ers game come closer to costing us the Playoffs than trading Duke. Not any one player has cost us anything. The lack of discipline and entirely too many penalties play a larger role than Hilliard replacing Duke.
To me .. The way the TEAM played in the Tennessee game .. and the 49ers game come closer to costing us the Playoffs than trading Duke. Not any one player has cost us anything. The lack of discipline and entirely too many penalties play a larger role than Hilliard replacing Duke.
This is the truth. Trying to make some far fetched claim that Duke not being here cost us the playoffs is conjecture in its wildest form.