Lucy (and by association, Limitless) - 07/25/14 05:28 AM
Has anyone seen a trailer for this or considered seeing it?
Does anyone else almost feel annoyed by the fact that this is the 2nd movie now where they assume that we can *unlock* more than the 10% of our brain that we use.
In both Limitless and Lucy now they use the premise of unlocking the other 90% of our brain. And accessing the entire 100% of our brain.
We actively use 10% of our brain because the other 90% manages life processes and human functions. If we were to access the other 90% of our brain it would force us to control our own breathing, our heart beating, our digestion, our memories, our thought processes, our ability to think, our ability to do everything that our bodies do naturally. We wouldn't be able to survive as our inability to actively control all of the things that our brain does without thinking, on its own, because that 90% of our brain controls everything.
Why do they assume that we all will think that accessing all 100% of our brain would ultimately make us better at our lives and able to do potentially supernatural, or greater things...All we would do is be overwhelmed greatly by the overwhelming amount of life processes we would need to control and quite quickly die.
Your thoughts? Why is this an okay premise? Why would movie studios and/or novel writers think this makes any sense?
Does anyone else almost feel annoyed by the fact that this is the 2nd movie now where they assume that we can *unlock* more than the 10% of our brain that we use.
In both Limitless and Lucy now they use the premise of unlocking the other 90% of our brain. And accessing the entire 100% of our brain.
We actively use 10% of our brain because the other 90% manages life processes and human functions. If we were to access the other 90% of our brain it would force us to control our own breathing, our heart beating, our digestion, our memories, our thought processes, our ability to think, our ability to do everything that our bodies do naturally. We wouldn't be able to survive as our inability to actively control all of the things that our brain does without thinking, on its own, because that 90% of our brain controls everything.
Why do they assume that we all will think that accessing all 100% of our brain would ultimately make us better at our lives and able to do potentially supernatural, or greater things...All we would do is be overwhelmed greatly by the overwhelming amount of life processes we would need to control and quite quickly die.
Your thoughts? Why is this an okay premise? Why would movie studios and/or novel writers think this makes any sense?