That's one thing about history. I'm pretty sure that by most white people in the south at the time, what Rosa Parks did was very unpopular and considered a terrible act at the time. Which is exactly why we can't really say how history will judge acts of civil discourse we see today.
Our "in the moment judgements" very well could have zero impact on how history will judge them tomorrow.
I agree w/you, but perhaps you are misunderstanding what I am saying. The story history tells is not always the correct one. The people who write about history put their own slant on things.
Growing up, my History books told my generation that "Indians" were savages and how the brutalized poor, innocent white pioneers. The truth is actually much different.
Same goes w/Rosa. History paints her as this uneducated, common African American woman who was so tired that she decided to sit in front of the bus. She was much more than that. She was very intelligent and she associated w/extremely intelligent blacks who planned this out because they knew how important it could be for a righteous cause.
I'll refrain from going off about Kaep, but I think that already the history tellers are fabricating his true intent.