|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066 Likes: 10
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066 Likes: 10 |
I have no way of knowing - but maybe Depo has been the guy in Jimmy's organization that has been the most consistently correct with his calls and opinions even when those calls/opinions weren't followed? I'm not even suggesting that's what has happened - but wouldn't that be a more likely explanation that Depo being a some sort of super slime ball who is constantly undermining his 'opponents' who vie for power within the front office? ... If the guy was making intelligent contributions that were proved correct with hindsight, wouldn't that be a good reason to keep him? I agree. That has to be the reason. He provides information on who stand the best chance of being a good player. He doesn't make the choices, he just provides information on who could be a better selection. Haslam see that information and why Depo is still here while others have flamed out....or, been snuffed out. I agree, Depo isn't some snake in the grass, here to cause discourse and turmoil. I have never met the man, but he seems pretty transparent to me. I think we are fortunate to have the guy. No one called Depo a snake in the grass or a super slime ball. That is just fabricated BS. What I did was present an alternative view of how things may have went down instead of the one put out by guys like you, cfrs, and others...........who have used words like "gorilla" to describe Dorsey and constantly tell everyone that he couldn't work well others and was a source of dysfunction. Well, there were those several threads posted by mac whose entire premise was that very idea, even if he didn't use those exact words.
"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things." -Jack Burton
-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945 Likes: 763
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945 Likes: 763 |
well, that's pretty concrete right there.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 Likes: 906
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 Likes: 906 |
j/c:
I know very little about draft trade value, so this might be really dumb.........but, does trading our 2nd round pick [41st overall] to Washington for Williams and their 3rd round pick [66th overall] make sense?
FYI: Washington currently does not have a 2nd round pick.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,292 Likes: 247
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,292 Likes: 247 |
Asked #Browns GM Andrew Berry specifically about trading out of No. 10 if team can address LT with veteran. "We are not going to be pigeon-holed into a certain decision or a certain mode of operation," he said. "We are going to make the best decision that we think is right."
Tom Withers @twithersAP
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,329 Likes: 1346
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,329 Likes: 1346 |
Tackles are tackles.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,608 Likes: 89
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,608 Likes: 89 |
May or may not happen before or after the draft Well, covered all the bases. Journalism.
How does a league celebrating its 100th season only recognize the 53 most recent championships?
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 Likes: 906
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 Likes: 906 |
I think she is a pretty good journalist and does have some ties to people in the organization. At least she didn't lie or make things up like some other reporters have.
But yeah, that statement was crazy. She should have just said something like: The Browns are still open to the possibility of trading for Trent Williams.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205 Likes: 234
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205 Likes: 234 |
The key part of Josina Anderson's tweet was that she said "per source" and the portions of her tweet that were in quotes. Point being that someone - we assume from the Redskins or the Browns or the agent - acknowledged that a trade for Williams is still on the table, ie, possible. Its not "news", but its not nothing either.
Last edited by Dave; 04/21/20 10:15 AM. Reason: added "the agent"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,216 Likes: 588
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,216 Likes: 588 |
I think Jason Peters still out there looking for a team helps us not feel desperate. If a team were to sign him before the draft, things might heat up a little bit.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,069 Likes: 337
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 8,069 Likes: 337 |
Late round picks are crap shoots. UDFA are lower. To say a team "missed" on a player implies that there was a better than average chance that the player would be successful.
They took a chance on a guy walking the street after the draft. He didn't work out. That is far, far more likely to happen with an UDFA than it is to have them start and succeed. It's not so much that he missed on Harrison as that he didn't otherwise address the position, to me. If you're counting on a UDFA and/or another team's bust to be your starting LT, it probably won't end well. Especially ones with so many red flags on and off the field. But then again, in the right environment, maybe Harrison wouldn't have turned out the way he did. It's hard to pinpoint the exact fault. Then he did seem to miss on Corbett. We're looking at needing OL. I'm okay with someone other than Dorsey being the one to handle it. I'm not sure Berry would be my ideal choice, but I believe he'll at least listen to Callahan and Stefanski. I'm not sure that was true of Dorsey. He seemed to be more this is who I like, deal with it. Sometimes he was right-like trading Hyde so Chubb would have to get time. However, it's not a very healthy dynamic. Sometimes he was wrong-Thomas, Corbett, Avery (more round peg, square hole than the player.)
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns. Fiercely Independent.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501 |
I have no way of knowing - but maybe Depo has been the guy in Jimmy's organization that has been the most consistently correct with his calls and opinions even when those calls/opinions weren't followed? I'm not even suggesting that's what has happened - but wouldn't that be a more likely explanation that Depo being a some sort of super slime ball who is constantly undermining his 'opponents' who vie for power within the front office? ... If the guy was making intelligent contributions that were proved correct with hindsight, wouldn't that be a good reason to keep him? I agree. That has to be the reason. He provides information on who stand the best chance of being a good player. He doesn't make the choices, he just provides information on who could be a better selection. Haslam see that information and why Depo is still here while others have flamed out....or, been snuffed out. I agree, Depo isn't some snake in the grass, here to cause discourse and turmoil. I have never met the man, but he seems pretty transparent to me. I think we are fortunate to have the guy. No one called Depo a snake in the grass or a super slime ball. That is just fabricated BS. What I did was present an alternative view of how things may have went down instead of the one put out by guys like you, cfrs, and others...........who have used words like "gorilla" to describe Dorsey and constantly tell everyone that he couldn't work well others and was a source of dysfunction. I’m pretty sure I’ve never called John Dorsey a gorilla. Thank you for the misrepresentation! If I had to compare John Dorsey to an animal I would compare him an owl. People think owls are smart but they are really not, they are dumb. But they are really good at the one thing they know.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618 Likes: 587
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618 Likes: 587 |
Peen mentioned Dorsey looking like a gorilla in a post. I do like the Owl analogy. I do think Dorsey is a very good talent evaluator - he had a few misses but overall I think mostly he did as well as anyone could have. The trade for Vernon and OBJ might be the ultimate litmus test - I think both are excellent players we just need to see more of them and healthy.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455 Likes: 1318
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455 Likes: 1318 |
I have no way of knowing - but maybe Depo has been the guy in Jimmy's organization that has been the most consistently correct with his calls and opinions even when those calls/opinions weren't followed? I'm not even suggesting that's what has happened - but wouldn't that be a more likely explanation that Depo being a some sort of super slime ball who is constantly undermining his 'opponents' who vie for power within the front office? ... If the guy was making intelligent contributions that were proved correct with hindsight, wouldn't that be a good reason to keep him? You certainly jumped to a conclusion that I never made. I never even suggested anyone was a "slime ball". Let me clear this up a little. We have people saying that Depo is nothing but a numbers guy. That he wields no power in the FO. That he's more a cog in the wheel. The fact he's been around going on his third regime shows this is false. The fact the very HC he wanted hired last year is now our HC shows this is false. For someone who "doesn't make the choices", Stefnaski is here. An owner doesn't fire a bunch of people to only turn around and rehire them only two years later unless someone presents a solid case for doing so to him. This didn't happen because Haslam had some epiphany in the middle of the night. Minus Sashi Brown we have the same people we had here two years ago in this FO. My point is and will remain that unless Depo wields a lot of power and influence, that would never happen. That's abundantly clear here. That isn't some sinister plot. Depo is who Haslam has decided to listen to in building the FO we have now. He listened to him concerning who should be our HC. This is Depo's group. And Depo will live or die by their results.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066 Likes: 10
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066 Likes: 10 |
[/quote]
For someone who "doesn't make the choices", Stefnaski is here. An owner doesn't fire a bunch of people to only turn around and rehire them only two years later unless someone presents a solid case for doing so to him. This didn't happen because Haslam had some epiphany in the middle of the night.
Well maybe it did? Before DePo was hired he told Jimmy he would have to commit to the process over the long haul. I do believe that at times Jimmy has gotten over excited and tried to short cut that process. Maybe DePo finally convinced him that his short cutting has been the biggest hindrance?
"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things." -Jack Burton
-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455 Likes: 1318
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455 Likes: 1318 |
And that would only bolster my conviction that Depo has much more power and influence than many posters seem willing to admit.
The difference between myself and some others is that I'm not saying that's a bad thing. I have no idea how this thing will play out and I have an open mind about it. The evidence will be what we see in terms of results on the field as it has been with every other HC and regime.
My premise has simply been all along that Depo certainly has more influence than some are willing to admit. My assertion is that the evidence is pretty clear on that.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618 Likes: 587
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618 Likes: 587 |
I never said you called Depo a slim ball or anything else. I used those words to paint an analogy between two different scenarios ....
I was talking in general - and the analogy stands regardless of what words you choose or how you want describe either of the possibilities.
I think it's been fair to say some posters have expressed an opinion that Depo might be here because he's smart and been right about some calls in the past ... and it's fair to say some posters have questioned if Depo has been resentful of others in the FO and maybe has used his position to negatively influence Haslam (either with 'poisonous' words or negative spin) about others in the FO. . . . however you want to describe those different possibilities that have been inferred of Depo, I don't mind. But in those two scenarios, I think it's more likely that he's here because he's smart and been correct, just my opinion .... fact is I don't know and don't really care. What I care about is what he and Berry and Stefanski do together.
Last edited by mgh888; 04/21/20 12:50 PM.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066 Likes: 10
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066 Likes: 10 |
And that would only bolster my conviction that Depo has much more power and influence than many posters seem willing to admit.
The difference between myself and some others is that I'm not saying that's a bad thing. I have no idea how this thing will play out and I have an open mind about it. The evidence will be what we see in terms of results on the field as it has been with every other HC and regime.
My premise has simply been all along that Depo certainly has more influence than some are willing to admit. My assertion is that the evidence is pretty clear on that. I think that's perfectly reasonable. After all, the dude IS the Chief Strategy Officer.
"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things." -Jack Burton
-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,937 Likes: 69
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,937 Likes: 69 |
... I think it's more likely that he's here because he's smart and been correct, just my opinion .... ...and mine as well. Of course, just my opinion...
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945 Likes: 763
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945 Likes: 763 |
j/c:
I know very little about draft trade value, so this might be really dumb.........but, does trading our 2nd round pick [41st overall] to Washington for Williams and their 3rd round pick [66th overall] make sense?
FYI: Washington currently does not have a 2nd round pick. I would not be in such a hurry to give up so much. Don't bid against yourself. Look at cap numbers... who else that needs a tackle, and won't draft one on Day 1, can even afford Trent's contract?
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945 Likes: 763
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945 Likes: 763 |
Williams' cap hit in 2020 will be $12.5 million
2019 NFL Draft – Average Guaranteed Dollars by Round 1st Round – $16,939,370 2nd Round – $3,786853 3rd Round – $946,211 4th Round – $692,925 5th Round – $301,369 6th Round – $161,745 7th Round – $88,795
2020 Minimum Rookie Salaray: $510,000 You have to figure that each team will need a minimum of at least $5 million for signing rookies.
Trent plus Rookies together is a minimum of $17.5 million, meaning that it is reasonably unlikely that any team with less than $20 million would trade for Trent.
Currently, only 10 teams have sufficient space to carry both:
10. Texans: $19.5M 9. Bills: $20.9M 8. Titans: $21.9M 7. Chargers: $22.3M 6. Dolphins: $22.7M 5. Skins: $23.8M 4. Colts: $23.9M 3. Eagles: $27.1M 2. Lions: $29.5M 1. Browns: $38.4M
So, of those, who NEEDS a LT badly enough to trade for one, is NOT going to take one in the Top 10 of the Draft, AND is willing to carry his salary? Oh, and if he gets a new contract, that cost for this year goes up to closer to $20M just for him.
I'm going to go on a limb and say that NONE of them are in the race. The lone possibilities are teams in that list that are also picking Top 10, but plan to draft a QB. That's it.
Browns is the Browns
... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26,809 Likes: 459
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 26,809 Likes: 459 |
And that would only bolster my conviction that Depo has much more power and influence than many posters seem willing to admit. As I have said many times before bro. Depo is the Chief Strategy Officer. He is in charge of setting up ALL processes being used by the Browns to make sure they are all rowing together in the same direction, and not in different directions. That includes all departments as to how they are set up. He does not run the football department, only the hiring process. Depo is a big part of the operation but he is not in control of football decisions.
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870 Likes: 305
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870 Likes: 305 |
You know my love will Not Fade Away.........
#gmSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,471 Likes: 1279
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,471 Likes: 1279 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,471 Likes: 1279
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,471 Likes: 1279 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,246 Likes: 100
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,246 Likes: 100 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,471 Likes: 1279
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,471 Likes: 1279 |
And they didn't have to part with OJ Howard!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,608 Likes: 89
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,608 Likes: 89 |
How does a league celebrating its 100th season only recognize the 53 most recent championships?
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,216 Likes: 588
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,216 Likes: 588 |
I haven't been following him. Has Hooker more or less lived up to the hype he had coming out in the draft?
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
-PrplPplEater
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,246 Likes: 100
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,246 Likes: 100 |
I do not think he has lived up to the expectation, however, he has been injured often (20 games in 3 years). He is young and a true FS.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,937 Likes: 69
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,937 Likes: 69 |
According to NFL Network, Gronk has passed the physical and it's a done deal...
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Trades
|
|