What hate-spiel I was educating you one the possible members of his cabinet and what they stand for, but I guess if you dont agre with a poster its hate speech not an honest opinion.
Him and Cruz are the definition of right wing beta males.
i truly believe Trump can smash both their wives, and those two losers would absolutely find a way to suck it up and announce their support for him.
This is just pathetic.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Lol, whoa whoa whoa. What in tarnation is going on here? Why would trump fire his campaign chief if the polls are fake and he has the “real” polls?
For all the talk about fake polls, trump sure does seem to live by them pretty hard.....
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Maybe it's because I don't watch a lot of broadcast TV anymore, but it seems like there are a lot less political ads this year than usual for a Presidential election year.
Basically I see the same one Biden and one Trump ad.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
The White House reportedly sent the Pentagon dirt on Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman to derail his promotion Sonam Sheth and David Choi 13 hours ago
The White House sent the Pentagon a list of allegations against Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman after he testified against President Donald Trump during his impeachment, NBC News reported.
The National Security Council transmitted the list to the Pentagon while Vindman was on track for a promotion to colonel, according to the report.
The list claimed Vindman created a hostile work environment at the NSC but its claims could not ultimately be corroborated.
Trump fired Vindman and his twin brother, Yevgeny, from the NSC after the former testified against the president.
Last week, Vindman announced that he was retiring from the Army following "a campaign of bullying, intimidation, and retaliation" by Trump.
The White House sent the Pentagon a list of allegations against Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman after he testified against President Donald Trump during his impeachment, NBC News reported Wednesday.
Vindman served on the National Security Council as its top Ukraine expert until February, when both he and his twin brother, Yevgeny, were ousted from the White House by President Donald Trump. The president had Vindman removed after he testified against Trump during impeachment proceedings last year pursuant to a congressional subpoena.
According to NBC News, the NSC sent the list of allegations against Vindman to the Pentagon late last year, while Vindman was on track for a promotion to colonel.
The list alleged that Vindman created a hostile work environment at the NSC, including that he was verbally abusive to a colleague. But investigators couldn't corroborate the claims, the report said.
The Department of Defense approved Vindman's promotion earlier this month. But on July 8, he announced that he would retire from the Army after 21 years of service because of a "campaign of bullying, intimidation, and retaliation" by Trump.
His resignation prevented the White House from reviewing Vindman's promotion packet as the final approval authority.
Vindman's promotion to the rank of colonel was thrown into uncertainty after he decided to testify against the president.
The Purple Heart recipient directly listened in on a July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during which Trump asked Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden ahead of the 2020 election.
Vindman testified that he was "concerned" by what he heard and that he found the conversation "inappropriate" and "improper."
It was wrong "for the president to request — to demand — an investigation into a political opponent, especially a foreign power where there's at best dubious belief that this would be a completely impartial investigation," he said.
He added: "This would have significant implications if it became public knowledge, and it would be perceived as a partisan play that would undermine our Ukraine policy, and it would undermine our national security."
After Vindman's testimony, Trump baselessly claimed he broke the chain of command and "leaked" details of his conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The president's Republican defenders on Capitol Hill and in the media also made racist attacks against Vindman questioning his loyalty to the US because he and his family are refugees.
Trump previously suggested the military would explore taking disciplinary action against Vindman — which never materialized — before dismissing him and his brother from the NSC.
Following Vindman's resignation, his attorney alleged he was being retaliated against for testifying during Trump's impeachment.
"Through a campaign of bullying, intimidation, and retaliation, the President of the United States attempted to force LTC Vindman to choose: Between adhering to the law or pleasing a President," the attorney, David Pressman, said in a statement.
The difference between Jesus and religion Religion mocks you for having dirty feet Jesus gets down on his knees and washes them
Trump says Joe Biden is a ‘puppet’ of AOC and Bernie Sanders
President Trump said Friday that Joe Biden is “a puppet” of New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and would leave people “at the mercy of a socialist mob.”
Trump told Cuban and Venezuelan exiles in Florida that Biden’s alliance with the self-described socialists is frightening.
“Joe Biden and the radical left are trying to impose the same system — socialism plus — in America. Biden is a puppet of Bernie Sanders, AOC and the militant left,” Trump said.
“Nobody will be safe in a Biden America, but Biden doesn’t know what a Biden America is if you ask him to define it — he wouldn’t even know what it is, but other people do. And he will have radical people running that.”
Sanders (I-Vt.) and Biden issued a joint policy agenda Wednesday. The left-wing senator defeated Biden in Democrats’ first three presidential contests this year and his enthusiastic base is essential for Biden in November.
Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is co-chairing a Biden campaign climate change task force.
Trump often describes Biden, 77, as senile and says “other people” will run the country if he’s elected. In Florida, Trump added a jab at Biden’s remark this week endorsing redirecting police funds following the killing of George Floyd in Minnesota.
“Biden wants to defund the police,” Trump said. “He wants to call the cops the enemy, which he did the other day, leaving every citizen at the mercy of a socialist mob, or a mob far worse than socialism was ever meant to be.”
Trump slammed the Obama administration’s policies in Latin America, including steps toward lifting the longstanding Cuban embargo. By contrast, Trump said, he sanctioned Venezuela’s socialist government and recognized Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido as the country’s interim president.
“Biden pledged to reinstate the pro-Communist policies of the Obama-Biden administration. They were pro-Communist policies. The deal he made with Cuba is ridiculous,” Trump said.
Well there is a lot of hate from many who want to call AOC and Bernie communists ... I'd say this is an attempt to motivate those folks to view Biden as an extension of the far left of the Dems .... Never mind that Biden is as centrist as they come. No doubt it will work on some but probably not for most of the swing voters that will decide this election
The more things change the more they stay the same.
Definitely more evidence that the only person trump ever hired that was qualified for the position is Stormy Daniels.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
How come trump doesn’t talk about the Rasmussen polls anymore? He always use to post the results on Twitter.
What happened?
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Trump's campaign channeled nearly $400,000 to his private business in 2 days Sonam Sheth 4 hours ago
President Donald Trump's campaign sent nearly $400,000 to his private business in just two days, The Washington Post's David Fahrenthold reported Friday.
Fahrenthold said documents showed that the campaign channeled $380,000 to the president's personal business in 43 transactions.
The Trump Organization told Fahrenthold the money was for a weeklong "donor retreat" at Mar-a-Lago in March.
Open Secrets, a Washington organization that closely tracks money in politics, first spotted the payments in Federal Election Commission filings from the Trump Victory Committee. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
President Donald Trump's campaign sent nearly $400,000 to his private business in just two days, The Washington Post's David Fahrenthold reported on Friday.
Documents showed that the campaign channeled $380,000 to the president's personal business in 43 transactions, Fahrenthold said, adding that the Trump Organization told him the money was for a weeklong "donor retreat" at Mar-a-Lago in March.
Open Secrets, an arm of the Center for Responsive Politics that closely tracks money in politics, first spotted the payments in Federal Election Commission filings from the Trump Victory Committee, a joint fundraising committee between Trump and the Republican National Committee.
This isn't the first time the president's personal and business interests have become entangled with his political office.
In February, The Post reported that the Trump Organization charged the Secret Service exorbitant rates to protect the president when he travels to his properties.
Citing federal records and people who had seen the receipts, The Post reported that the Trump Organization billed US taxpayers up to $650 per night at the Mar-a-Lago resort dozens of times in 2017 and $396.15 on dozens of occasions in 2018.
The Trump Organization also billed the Secret Service $17,000 a month in 2017 for agents to stay in a three-bedroom cottage at the Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, to protect the president when he traveled there, The Post reported.
The report said the Secret Service was billed for the cottage even on days when Trump wasn't at the golf club.
Receipts and documents showed that US taxpayers shelled out more than $471,000 to; Trump's properties from January 2017 to April 2018, The Post said.
Trump also frequently hosts foreign leaders at Mar-a-Lago, where they pay the market rate. After Trump became president, several countries with embassies in Washington, DC, began hosting parties and events at Trump properties in what ethics experts described as a bid to curry favor with the president.
The Post reported in December 2018 that shortly after the election, Saudi-funded lobbyists spent more than $270,000 to rent rooms for about 500 nights at the Trump International Hotel in Washington.
The RNC has spent more than $2 million at Trump Organization hotels and resorts. And Trump's campaign, which is funded in part by donations from the president's supporters and big-dollar donors, has spent more than $14 million at his properties.
In September, Trump faced harsh backlash when Politico reported that members of the US Air Force had stayed at Trump's five-star Turnberry resort in Scotland as part of an unusual layover on a routine trip from the US to Kuwait to deliver supplies.
That and other incidents "raise the possibility that the military has helped keep Trump's Turnberry resort afloat," the report said.
Last summer, the president also sparked a firestorm when he announced that the 2020 G7 conference, which the US is set to host, would take place at the Trump National Doral golf club in Miami, Florida.
"Doral Miami, so it's a great area. We haven't found anything that could even come close to competing it," Trump said at the time. He backed off after a public backlash and allegations that he was using the conference to line his own pockets.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
You but you didn’t ask me. You ask Jester, and I simply wanted to know where you were trying to go with that.
Such a defensive snowflake. Oh well.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
So, is anyone going to answer my question or are we only going to look at one side of things?
Sorry, but I am not a fan of one-sided arguments. Let's look at the entire picture. If certain people can't do that, then it tells me--and other rational folks--exactly how full of crap some of you are.
It's like this:
There are 3,492 posts [I made that number up, but it's probably close] about police brutality and if a poster asks if we can back off a bit on so many posts about hating on the police because it becomes divisive after awhile, a poster will get on his high horse and say that we have to point out the problems in order to correct them. The like-minded posters will call "Here-here!"
Then, a poster will post maybe 2 -4 articles about the other side committing travesties, and the same posters will come back with this comment: "Obsessed." Those same people that populate the anti-police threads will then personally attack the poster bringing up other crimes, because you know, if we turn it into a personal thing, we don't have to discuss the real issue.
Y'all are some big-time hypocrites and what is really annoying is that you are either not smart enough or too hateful to see how dumb your strategies are. You are actually driving people away from supporting your cause and voting for your party due to you constant hate, bias, and hypocrisy.
My son came over after work because I had made homemade pasta, meatballs, and authentic Italian sauce that cooked all day long.
We were talking about this topic and many others w/my wife. I brought up what is being said on this board and most of the political/social articles I read on Yahoo.
He told us about some of the crap that he sees on Facebook and other places where people are posting a bunch of videos showing black crime. He said it was BS because a lot of the videos were from past times and not since the Floyd murder. He said some of them were school fights and schools were closed. I replied that I don't see that side because of this board and Yahoo, which are both biased in the opposite direction and I was glad he brought it up.
Thus, my point is that there are idiots on both sides. Hateful souls who try and divide us. I think both sides suck ass.
We have both good and bad people in almost every freaking category of our species. It infuriates me that so many people spend so much time trying to divide us. We don't have to agree on things, but let's work together to improve things instead of trying to divide and conquer.
I know many of you are sick of me saying we should work together. Well, I'm sick of hearing you trying to divide us. So, deal w/it. Or not. But, you won't be able to silence me.
One last thing..................I do find it extremely ironic that so many of you have an issue w/people working together and getting along to solve our problems. I do find it odd that people get upset when I say that two people working together is better than two people fighting one another.
man, who wouldve thought that after everything thats currently going on, i really need to make my dishwasher great again!
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
I have never claimed to be a "savior." That is a label you put upon me and that Pit has championed, even going to the point of putting quotation marks around me calling myself a savior.
It's all BS. It's what you guys do.
I don't think I am a savior by any means. I just want to people to treat others fairly and w/respect. I want others to not assign labels to groups, but to judge individuals by their actions rather than than their skin color, gender, etc.
That's not being a savior. That's being reasonable.
Who cares if Trump is donating his salary with one hand while he steals money right and left with his other hand... smh
I said it from the beginning, when all the facts are finally exposed we will all learn that this entire presidency has been one big heist! Trump got his!
Trump got fact checked hard on this one. what an embarrassment. literally tried to lie his ass off, and THEN got even more embarrassed due to the fact that he demonstrated that he didnt even read the proposals.
but thats why MAGA hatters always trashed Wallace and Smith. they dont play that BS like the rest of the clowns on Fox news. they dont brown nose the president, and the MAGA hatters cant stand it:
'Sir, he does not': Fox's Chris Wallace fact-checks Trump's claim that Biden supports defunding the police
WASHINGTON – Fox News host Chris Wallace fact-checked President Donald Trump's inaccurate claim during an interview that former Vice President Joe Biden is in favor of defunding the police, leading to a testy reaction.
In a clip released between the "FOX News Sunday” anchor and Trump – the entire interview will air Sunday – the president blamed "stupidly run" Democratic local governments for the increase in violence in some cities and implied the increase was the fault of the defund the police movement.
'You can't do that': Fox News host Wallace confronts DeVos on threat to redirect funds from schools
"It’s gotten totally out of control and it’s really because they want to defund the police, and Biden wants to defund the police," Trump said in the clip about the presumptive Democratic nominee.
Wallace interjected, "Sir, he does not."
"Look, he signed a charter with Bernie Sanders," Trump responded, referring to the unity platform released by Biden and the progressive Vermont senator that unveiled multiple progressive ideas and policy proposals.
The proposed Democratic Party platform does include a series of police reforms including banning choke holds, ending racial profiling and allowing victims of abuse to pursue civil litigation.
However, the platform does not support defunding the police, as Biden and his campaign have stated on multiple occasions.
Wallace points this out, saying the plan "says nothing about defunding the police."
"Oh really? It says abolish, it says defund. Let’s go! Get me the charter, please," Trump said, turning to speak to staff out-of-frame.
Wallace explained on Fox News' "Bill Hemmer Reports" that the president had his staff retrieve highlights of the unity platform that found "a lot of things that he objected to that Biden has agreed to."
"But he couldn’t find any indication – because there isn’t any – that Joe Biden has sought to defund and abolish the police," the Fox News anchor said.
The Trump administration and campaign have been continually lodging attacks and ads at Biden, claiming he wants to defund and abolish the police.
Vice President Mike Pence said Friday, “Joe Biden would weaken the thin blue line that separates us from chaos,” and continued, “You won’t be safe in Joe Biden’s America,” seizing on remarks Biden made recently where he expressed support for redirecting some funds, but not all, to bettering social services.
Law enforcement has become a flashpoint between Biden and Trump because of protests following the May 25 death of George Floyd in Minneapolis police custody.
More: George Floyd's family sues city of Minneapolis, Derek Chauvin and 3 former officers
Biden became the presumptive nominee with support from Black voters in key states who are demanding police reforms. Trump has campaigned as the law-and-order president fighting chaos that erupted at some protests.
Biden has pledged support for the central cause of Black Lives Matter protesters – fighting systemic racism – and proposed policing changes.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
I have never claimed to be a "savior." That is a label you put upon me and that Pit has championed, even going to the point of putting quotation marks around me calling myself a savior.
It's all BS. It's what you guys do.
I don't think I am a savior by any means. I just want to people to treat others fairly and w/respect. I want others to not assign labels to groups, but to judge individuals by their actions rather than than their skin color, gender, etc.
That's not being a savior. That's being reasonable.
Says the guy sitting on the fence only pointing fingers and looking down to one side and ignoring the damage and the hate and death toll the other side is helping to grow. Pffft
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
You do realize that name calling is against the rules, right? Not that I'm going to report you are start some rant about it in the refs forum or anything.
The rest of your post is just one of your normal daily rants which you insist on infecting and derailing every thread with these days.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Let’s hope one day it happens, so I’ll keep doing it.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Trump declines to say he'll accept results of election: "I have to see"
President Trump refused to say on "Fox News Sunday" whether he would accept the results of November's election if he loses to Joe Biden, telling host Chris Wallace: "I have to see. I'm not just going to say yes."
Why it matters: Trump gave a similar answer in 2016 when he was running against Hillary Clinton, prompting concerns there might not be a peaceful transition to power. At that time, however, Trump was not the incumbent.
Trump said his willingness to concede will depend on mail-in voting, which he said he thinks is going to "rig the election" — a claim he has previously made without factual evidence.
What he's saying: "I'm not a good loser. I don't like to lose. I don't lose too often. ... Look, Hillary Clinton asked me the same thing. ... You know what, she's the one who never accepted the loss."
People talk about a possible civil war coming. The problem is they don't see the big picture in regards to what the actual cause will be and that it will be coming from the top where their attention should be focused.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
People talk about a possible civil war coming. The problem is they don't see the big picture in regards to what the actual cause will be and that it will be coming from the top where their attention should be focused.
Before the 2016 election, I voiced my concern that I thought it was possible that Trump could lead us into a race war.
Four years later, I his leadership has been very divisive. I don't talk about it much on here because there already are many people beating that drum. I'm not a crowd follower and have decided to pursue arguing against the loudest voices on here. In everyday life, my positions are different than they have been on here in recent weeks.
