Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,463
Likes: 1319
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,463
Likes: 1319
Originally Posted By: 85_Browns_Queen
Does Woods have the guts?


rofl


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 3
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 3
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
I've always been one that thinks a single approach on either D or O is shortsighted. Stefanski seems to adjust the O to take advantage of our opponents weaknesses which will vary from game to game.

I don't see that so much with Woods. But I also look at the circumstances involved here. We have so many new moving parts on the D I think it would be much harder to employ such a strategy at this point.

I liken it to the O of last year. The first half of the season didn't see many adjustments on O. In the second half of the season as the O came together we saw more adjustments based on the opponents. The old analogy of "You have to learn to crawl before you can walk" comes to mind.

I think we are actually very much on the same page here. At this stage I don't find it too concerning. Had we not have handed the ball to Mahomes three times with turnovers I firmly believe we would have beaten KC. Those turnovers were beyond the control of our D. I don't think there are any teams in the NFL that can have three turnovers against the Chiefs in the fourth quarter and walk away with the victory.

While this D hasn't been pretty, we won against the Texans by ten points. So it's not as if this D isn't doing enough to win because they are. It just hasn't been pretty.

But much like yourself I expect more from them as time goes by. I expect to see progress and more variations depending on opponents and situations.

I'm certainly not going to rush to judgement based on the first two games with so many new moving parts.


Well said and it should be repeated. You start somewhere and you hopefully end somewhere else and the offense from a season ago that oddly went thru an off season transformation sorta like the defense did this year and by mid season they sat down and said we do this well we don't do this well, and if we tweak this and do that it will be better, and its been day and night ever sense so yeah crawl before you walk, walk before you run and hey this sorta proves it's possible and hey even likely.

No matter how reasoned your post though you're soft. hahaha


BTTB

AKA Upbeat Dawg

Can't believe I am in a group that is comprised of the best NOT just fans but people on the planet.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
Originally Posted By: mgh888
Can anyone name a QB that came to our house and we owned them? Anyone name a rookie QB or first time starter that was thrust into action and we owned them and made their life miserable? ...

Are you kidding!! Browns owned this guy so bad! They started the end of his career!
Can you guess.
Click to reveal..
Akili (freakin) Smith! 1999 bengal rofl sure it was a while ago but it is possible.

Justin Fields to start?
People could have seen this coming from the day he was drafted and the schedule was Browns in game #3.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,947
Likes: 3
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,947
Likes: 3
I’m concerned about the interior line of our defense, JF can tuck that and run


President - Fort Collins Browns Backers
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618
Likes: 587
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
I've always been one that thinks a single approach on either D or O is shortsighted. Stefanski seems to adjust the O to take advantage of our opponents weaknesses which will vary from game to game.

I don't see that so much with Woods. But I also look at the circumstances involved here. We have so many new moving parts on the D I think it would be much harder to employ such a strategy at this point.

I liken it to the O of last year. The first half of the season didn't see many adjustments on O. In the second half of the season as the O came together we saw more adjustments based on the opponents. The old analogy of "You have to learn to crawl before you can walk" comes to mind.

I think we are actually very much on the same page here. At this stage I don't find it too concerning. Had we not have handed the ball to Mahomes three times with turnovers I firmly believe we would have beaten KC. Those turnovers were beyond the control of our D. I don't think there are any teams in the NFL that can have three turnovers against the Chiefs in the fourth quarter and walk away with the victory.

While this D hasn't been pretty, we won against the Texans by ten points. So it's not as if this D isn't doing enough to win because they are. It just hasn't been pretty.

But much like yourself I expect more from them as time goes by. I expect to see progress and more variations depending on opponents and situations.

I'm certainly not going to rush to judgement based on the first two games with so many new moving parts.

Much better post, no snark, lots of points! LOL


The more things change the more they stay the same.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
Was he submitting for 888's approval? rolleyes

Justin Fields to start?
If Fields went 6-13 passing against the Bengals, then the Browns, need to also force a lot of incompletions!


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618
Likes: 587
Pay attention.

Or don't. I don't mind. As someone posted - you write schtick for shock value and not a lot else.... so ...


The more things change the more they stay the same.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
Likes: 234
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,205
Likes: 234
I think you just disrespected shtick.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
I remember when the Lions dude threw like 7 INTs and we still barely won the game


https://www.pro-football-reference.com/boxscores/200109230cle.htm
Those Were the days!

(Who was Coach then Pat Schurmur? ) ...
Look for yourself Throw Long!, Duh! it was 2000 and 1? 2001! Oh Butch Davis, the glory days. me- "Who would have thought we'd be looking back to the glory days of Butch Davis" Still arguably the best Browns coach since 1999.

The day Ty Detemer threw 7 interceptions for the Lions, 1 short of the NFL record.
Dawgs4life it was never closer than 7 points, but!!! there was no scoring in the final 11 minutes with that 10 point lead, so... Looking back, What a Wonderful Flubbed Game!
I'll Propose, the NFL! Could have looked at this game before deciding on later rule changes involving helping offenses with 15 yard, +automatic first down penalties for brushing a quarterback, in order! to give terrible offenses an ability to keep eyes glued to T.V.s.

A deep dive into this game! Is a wonderful, look into a time capsule of what has far too fast become history.
September 23, 2001. Only 2nd, or first game after the September 11th 9/11 attacks canceled the previous weeks football games to be played at the end of the schedule.
As 3 days of No fly zone for the entire continental US. existed.
( For those 3 days! I could see the sky as my ancestors had for 4000 years, but I hadn't my whole life.) Not a single white line cloud streak chem trail off a planes exhaust. ..
back to the game!

24 accumulated penalties, 15 on Detroit for 115 yards.

Anthony Henry had 3 ints! Tim Couch threw 3 touchdowns! One to Shaun O'Hara- (Ya that Shaun O'Hara.) was he an OL, or a DL, I think a center, maybe a TE?
The Lions!! had a fumble, but they didn't lose possession.
My Guy!! Daylon McCutcheon, had a forced fumble, on 6 solo tackles on the day.

( DTMB, members like ScottPlayersFaceMask: and KosarSideArmor: DiamDawg: around to read in that timeframe)
73,168 announce attendance! Lions favored by 1.5 in Cleveland frown. the Over/Under 33.0 (team used to score less, and more rofl to the 3rd down percentage)
The 3rd down percentage of that days game is hilarious!
Scoring per quarter,
Lions, 0,-0,-7,-7, final 14
Browns 7,-7,-10,-0 final 24 Yeah! Browns Won 24-14.

Scoring by quarter. 1st 8:55 Kevin Johnson 4 yd touchdown catch, from Tim Couch, Phil Dawson kick 7-0
2nd 13:21 Shaun O'Hara 2 yard catch from Couch! 14-0 Browns Halftime.....
3rd. 11:36 Phil Dawson 33yd kick good. 17-0 Browns
3rd. 7:26 Lions, Terry Fair, Interception Return Pick-6 26 yard return for the TD, Jason Hanson kick 7-17 Browns lead.
still 3rd..
Quincy FREAKING MORGAN!! 34 yard! pass, from Tim Freakin Couch! 24-7 good guys! 'talkin about!

4th. 11:25 Lions, Johnnie Morton 14 yard td pass from Ty Detmer, Hanson kick 14-24. Browns still lead.

Defense, interceptions:
Cleveland, Anthony Henry!!!! 3 interceptions for 58 yards no tds.
Jamir Miller! Jamir Miller led the Browns with 8 total tackles on the day, 4 combined, and 4 solo. and had
ONE Interception! for 0 yards
Corey Fuller 1 interception. 1 yard
Percy Ellsworth 1 interception, 19 yards!
Earl Little 1 interception 0 yards!

Tim Couch was sacked 3 times, 2 by Porcher, 1 by Tracy Scruggs
Shaun Rogers, (later Brown), led Detroit with 10 tackles 0 sacks.
Couch was intercepted twice. 1- the 26 yard pick 6 by Terry Fair
and 1 by Robert Bailey for 0 yards.

Browns penalized 9 times for 50 yards, Detroit penalized 15 times for 115 yards!

rofl Go Defense! the games, 3rd! Down! Coversions!
Detroit- 1 for 12, on third down
Cleveland- 2 for 11 on third down. Ooh Rah! Defense! Crunch Bunch!
Detroit was 1 for 1 on 4th down, Cleveland 0 tries on 4th down.
September 23 2001.
The day the Lions threw 7 interceptions against the Browns and the Browns still, Pulled Victory! ...


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,463
Likes: 1319
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,463
Likes: 1319
Originally Posted By: mgh888
Much better post, no snark, lots of points! LOL


Damn it! I hate it when I forget to throw some snark in there!


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618
Likes: 587
You got me for half a tick!!


The more things change the more they stay the same.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618
Likes: 587
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,618
Likes: 587
You can make up for it next time.


The more things change the more they stay the same.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,510
Likes: 807
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,510
Likes: 807
This could be a trap game. I can see us blowing this one if we aren't careful.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,571
Likes: 507
Thanks for the memory lol. I remember watching the game with my grandpa


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,393
Likes: 1000
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,393
Likes: 1000

Good points and I agree with both posts.

It most likely is the case with all teams.

It is not uncommon to stagger a bit at the beginning especially when there are many new pieces.

Harrison and Delpit are guys with like type skills. Both are long with speed. Both can drop down and tackle or drop back and cover. JJ3 is the classic FS.

JOK at the second level is another moving part. Coordination between the two groups is important.

The pass rush is what I have been surprised at. I know what Myles stated and he is right. If he always getting extra attention. Someone else needs to get there.

So far it has been noticeable that the offenses we have played have emphasized getting the ball out quickly.

Our defense is based upon pressure from the front four. Then having good coverage.

It maybe time to bring some blitzing from various positions. We can shoot JOK from the linebackers.
Both Harrison and Delpit have good rush moves.

So each game hopefully we will begin to see more options employed by Woods.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 3
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 3
Go back and watch the game the Texans were splitting their backs one to Tyrod's left and one to his right.

Those backs were used as blockers for Garret and Clowney and the center and right guard handled McDowell. I have watched football for many years I have never seen a team double 3 guys along the line. It caught the Browns and Woods off guard, it did me too honestly. 6 guys for 3 guys.

The backs were more then chipping too. I expect Woods was reluctant to change up things mid game we were winning we hadn't practiced a response and change comes with risk so he held tight. I expect he has a designed response at this point. The end of the game with Delpit may be a part of that but if we are going to be faced with doubles across the front we should be able to cook up a response that won't have happy endings for whomever gives it a go of their own.

Going back to game one KC didn't do it, and they spent a good part of the afternoon picking Mahommes up off the ground. This is going to be a season where teams are going to do odd things to try to counter our front, we have to get the little tweaks in place that watch these things explode in their faces when this is done.

But fans calling for the DC to be canned are laughable. We are 2 games into a nearly complete overhaul after we overhauled the O it was mid season before that really took off, and now after 2 games into a similar overhaul of the defense we have dumb fans calling for the DC's head. I think no make that I know this has to be as dumb a response as you will ever see especially after what we saw unfold when similar changes were made to the offense that offense is near unstoppable now and yes it took time. I wonder what would allow them to believe that somehow it would be less painful on the defensive side of the ball? Dumb, dumb, dumb.

I believe in the people, players, and team we have if you don't you never will. This team will come together and they will be everything you could ask for but its not microwave football so stop it.

We have many options as you have pointed out but everything has to blend together and grow, but what you can't do is panic especially when your winning the game. There are 2 things in the NFL W's and L's and when you have #1 in hand you don't introduce #2 by taking risks mid game so you can pile up style points.

Sorry Bone not upset with you but this fan base needs a good bit of good old common sense.....


BTTB

AKA Upbeat Dawg

Can't believe I am in a group that is comprised of the best NOT just fans but people on the planet.
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,393
Likes: 1000
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,393
Likes: 1000

I get it.

You build upon each game. People are always wanting perfection.

Play a team like the Texans it is not good enough to win. You have to win by 20 etc.

There are really good good players throughout the league. If there were games where you could win by a half a point. I would take it.

Coming from where the Browns have been. We should not forget how hard it is to win games.

The big stat for me last season was we never lost two in a row.

We also improved as the season rolled on.

I will practice patience. IMO once we figure a few things out. I think we get on a roll.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 106
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 106
So we don't need this . . . .:: Putting away the snark repellent, but keeping it within reach. brownie rofl


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2021 NFL Season Looking Back: Browns 26 Bears 6 Justin Fields to start

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5