DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Watson Suspended 6 Games

This is what he does. Makes lies up about people and repeats them over and over and over. I never saw you bash Robinson. Not once. I haven't bashed her either. I actually respect her decision. She did the best she could given the circumstances. She chastised both Watson and the NFL. She made her ruling given the information of what was presented to her. I think she did a great job considering the circumstances.

Of course, Pit just makes up stories to win an argument. He's a straight up troll. He doesn't root for the team anymore and trashes the Browns and its fans every single day. Don't let his BS get to you. Any reasonable person can see what he--and a few others--are doing.

Sorry about your overly emotional diatribe. I didn't mean to send you over the edge. There's help for that.

What she did was point to what she was basing her rulings on. It's nothing but basic court speak. Judges point out what statute or law they are referring to in making their rulings. In this case it was the guidelines the NFL set. As I said, those are pointed out in the report so people can look at them in reference to the report.

You on the other hand tried to make it seem as if there was something wrong with those guidelines and made that obvious. When I pointed out that their guideline was perfectly reasonable in regards to sexual assault and asked you to clarify your position on it you blew a gasket. I'm not really surprised by that.

Carry on....

I first read that and thought it was very unfair, for the reason you stated. Ain't nobody "showing remorse" for something they are denying in a court of law. The fact that people have to conduct themselves that way is more of an indictment of her profession and our system of justice than their actual lack of remorse. I would have preferred she outright said he "lied" (he did), and stated that as an aggravating factor. Dude's still denying he ever had an erection lmao.

Then I thought maybe there was opportunity within this process for him to show remorse to her personally, or at least exhibit any kind of grief that was evident to her. Or perhaps her statement comes from a place where she thinks he is "unphased" by any of this and doesn't seem to care. I don't know.

Jimmy Haslam says otherwise, and let's be honest... if there is any remorse to be shown, he would see it way before the person deciding Watson's fate for charges that are basically "unprovable" with actual evidence. Obviously, the flip side, is his heavily vested interest in "Deshaun the player".

People show remorse in a court of law when evidence has already proven guilt beyond any shadow of doubt. Nobody walks in and says "I did it! But I'm really sorry." Remorse is a dish that's best served after dinner, not before the waiter has seated you at the table.

And I have never once disputed any of that. So what in the hell is your point.

Once again he calls me a troll and talks his chit about me while not even knowing what I posted. How cowardly can one person be? Obviously this is considered acceptable behavior on here. The man knows no shame.

Is "chit" a new thing here now?

Can it be served on a Chingle?

Not sure, but I think Haslam might have been referring to how Watson has said he is remorseful for all the negative attention has been brought to the doorsteps of those close to him either professionally or personally. I don't think he has ever indicated that he was remorseful for something he maintains he never did.

This playing the uninvolved agitator is straight-up trolling too. You do it often like it's second nature.

Says the guy who admitted the only reason he would come back to the board was to troll me and diss Watson every Sunday.