DawgTalkers.net
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...eteran-rb-as-well-as-cb-greedy-williams/

The NFL trade deadline is just eight days away, and all 32 teams will be exploring how they can upgrade their rosters. The Cleveland Browns are reportedly listening to offers on two players who could attract some interest.

The Browns are listening to offers on running back Kareem Hunt and cornerback Greedy Williams, per 247Sports. Hunt was the subject of trade rumors this offseason. The veteran back reportedly informed the Browns in August that he was seeking a contract extension, and even sat out of some team drills. Cleveland.com reported that Hunt asked for a trade, while CBS Sports NFL Insider Jonathan Jones reported that the Browns had no interest in dealing him. However, things have apparently changed.

headshot-image
team logo
Kareem Hunt
CLE • RB • 27
ATT
66
YDS
263
TD
3
FL
0
View Profile
In seven games played this season, Hunt has recorded 350 yards from scrimmage and four touchdowns on 81 touches. He's averaging 37.6 rushing yards per game and a career-low 12.4 receiving yards per game. The Philadelphia Eagles, Buffalo Bills, Denver Broncos and Los Angeles Rams all reportedly checked in with the Carolina Panthers before they traded star running back Christian McCaffrey to the San Francisco 49ers. Maybe one of those teams could be interested in Hunt. The 2017 NFL rushing yards leader played in just eight games for the Browns last year due to a calf injury.


As for Williams, the second-round pick out of LSU in 2019 has played in just two games this year due to a hamstring injury, and has recorded four tackles. Last season in 16 games played, Williams recorded a career-high 10 passes defensed and 41 combined tackles. Cornerbacks Denzel Ward and Greg Newsome II are ahead of him on the Browns depth chart. Just 24-years-old, there should be a few teams interested in the former two-time All-SEC player.”


Well, Trading Kareem Hunt is essentially throwing in the towel on the season. Nice to see us already rebuilding.
If they trade hunt I hope that Berry won’t be here to waste the picks and stefanski won’t be here to fail at using them
meltdown Chernobyl
It’s time. Hunt won’t be back. This year is shot (and Hunt hasn’t been the old Hunt all year).

Greedy has had one of the most “meh” careers ever. Not sure what he’d even bring back.

I’m good with trading at this point
Can’t argue. It’s just hard to believe that this team is already focused on the draft. Talk about a waste of a season. I look at what the Bears are doing to New England right now and wonder if it’s time to start rebuilding. We’re clearly going nowhere with the way this team is constructed. 5 solid years of tanking and what do we have to show for it? Nothing. A super bowl appearance or even a conference title game appearance was too much to expect. Unreal.
Why not at this point?
Originally Posted by Dawgs4Life
It’s time. Hunt won’t be back. This year is shot (and Hunt hasn’t been the old Hunt all year).

Greedy has had one of the most “meh” careers ever. Not sure what he’d even bring back.

I’m good with trading at this point
Hunt looks fine, stefanski doesn’t give him touches, much like chubb
This year is lost, and they aren't going to re-sign Greedy or Hunt. Might as well get value for them while we can.
I actually was hoping to see more of Dernest now. Kinda surprised he hasn’t seen the field much
If you’re not even going to give Nick Chubb the ball, then you don’t need the best second string RB in the league.
Just to throw a fact in to the mix of doom, gloom, and fairy tales.............the Browns currently rank 5th overall in rushing attempts per game. Not sure who is getting all those carries if Chubb and Hunt aren't?
I have been saying that trading Hunt is the only real option is you are smart. I don't see the upside of keeping him the rest of the season to see him go away and not get anything in return.

Hunt could bring a decent receiver and or a decent pick. In a situation where people are complaining about having poor receivers and or not having draft picks, I don't get the beef people have over trading the guy.
Unless we think we’d get a compensatory pick after he signs elsewhere. Not sure what the market would be for him as a FA
Originally Posted by Dawgs4Life
Unless we think we’d get a compensatory pick after he signs elsewhere. Not sure what the market would be for him as a FA

I am not sure if we would or wouldn't. I am not even sure if we can since we signed him as a FA.
Trading Hunt at this point is probably a smart move. We have DEJ behind him and he has proven he can be effective. We almost certainly won't be able to keep Hunt next year.

I would not trade Greedy. You can never have too many corners in today's NFL, which is a passing league.
Originally Posted by Dawgs4Life
Unless we think we’d get a compensatory pick after he signs elsewhere. Not sure what the market would be for him as a FA

If the FO knows the chances of keeping him are slim, then trading him for an asset(s) makes a ton of sense. We have D'Ernst Johnson and drafted Jerome Ford so potential depth is there. This team is 2-5 and weeks away from Watson starting so the playoffs are a longshot at best. Get some draft capital if you are pretty sure he won't be playing for you next year.

If Buffalo was trying to get CMC, maybe they'll try to be in on Hunt as well?
I don't see much interest and/or trade return in Greedy. Nothing special up to this point and often injured.
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
I don't see much interest and/or trade return in Greedy. Nothing special up to this point and often injured.

Neither do I, but if the reports are accurate, at least a few teams are kicking the tires. I can't imagine it would be for much. Maybe a 6th at best, at least as I would value the deal, but who knows?
For a team not going to the playoffs this year, who are not signing either player beyond this year ... it makes perfect sense. But one more "Meh" moment when you realize what this means.

Not at all sure what a team would give you for Greedy - possibly a conditional 6th or 7th? Hunt might get you a 5th or 6th - wonder how much his value dropped from the start of the year when he wanted to be traded and the last tape on him was from 2021 when he appeared to be a bigger impact in the game than this year?
That is why I have wanted to trade Hunt early on. Especially when it became apparent that Ford looks to be pretty good.
I think it would be dumb to trade Greedy. Ward is dealing w/his second concussion [that we know of] and that is a scary proposition. It's a passing league. You need corners. A late round pick for a guy who can play corner? Nah, that would be dumb.

I do get trading Hunt, though.
Agreed the way the league is you need all the good DB's you can have. Greedy has been hurt more than you'd like to see but has played decent when healthy.
Greedy is trash, we'd be lucky to get a conditional 7th for him. Always hurt and is a walking PI call. So your one good player, openly lobbys to keep his friend who also happens to be one of only other good players on the team and you want to trade him... I rather trade Ward than hunt. maybe we can sucker a team into thinking Ward is worth the 100m
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Just to throw a fact in to the mix of doom, gloom, and fairy tales.............the Browns currently rank 5th overall in rushing attempts per game. Not sure who is getting all those carries if Chubb and Hunt aren't?

After last week we were 2nd in the league. This week we slipped to 5th.
If the touches continue to drop, Cleveland will be out of the top 10 in the next 2 weeks.

RUN THE BALL!!!!!!!!!!!!
I said earlier that Ward had suffered two concussions in the NFL. It's actually three.
Trailing by double digits lends itself to having to pass more later in games. All I know is that people saying we don't use Chubb and Hunt are wrong. Period.
Shocked these are the only 2 on the market. Hunt should bring us something of value, not sure what Greedy can bring in.
Other GMs knows that Berry is desperate and that will reflect Kareem and Greedy’s trade value. Apart from bad timing this once again gives vibes about another panic move from the Browns FO.

Why am I not surprised….
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
I don't see much interest and/or trade return in Greedy. Nothing special up to this point and often injured.

Agreed. I'd be floored if the Browns could get higher than a conditional 6th for Greedy. Maybe they get a 5th for Hunt.

I wouldn't be surprised if Joe Douglas is making calls to Berry to discuss a trade for Conklin. The Jets just lost their starting RT for the year and Conklin is on an expiring contract.

Berry may be waiting to see what happens vs the Bengals before going into total sell off mode. Browns lose and add Clowney to the list of possible trade candidates.
j/c

From all indications Hunt was on the trading block for the right offer before the season even began. I don't see why anyone would think taking trade offers now would be any indication they're throwing in the towel. Hunt made it obvious he either wanted a long term deal or to be traded. His deal is up at the end of this season. The Browns have no intention of giving him a long term deal. So if they can get multiple offers now it would be the best possible scenario to facilitate a trade. The only obstacle I see is that whoever trades for him will have to work out an extension with him to make it worth their trouble.
I don't think we need to rebuild. We all know we can use 2 solid DT's and another Lb. We need another WR. We add another 5 good solid players in positions of need, and we've got the team we thought we had. If we had those 2 good DT's and DW playing at his normal level from the 1st game our record would probably be reversed. JMO
j/c:

Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
I think it would be dumb to trade Greedy. Ward is dealing w/his second concussion [that we know of] and that is a scary proposition. It's a passing league. You need corners. A late round pick for a guy who can play corner? Nah, that would be dumb.

I do get trading Hunt, though.

💯 Trading Greedy for next to nothing would be stupid. Ward will never, ever be a weekly shoe-n to be on the field.
Originally Posted by FATE
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
I think it would be dumb to trade Greedy. Ward is dealing w/his second concussion [that we know of] and that is a scary proposition. It's a passing league. You need corners. A late round pick for a guy who can play corner? Nah, that would be dumb.

I do get trading Hunt, though.

💯 Trading Greedy for next to nothing would be stupid. Ward will never, ever be a weekly shoe-n to be on the field.

Ward just needs to get his head right.
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Trailing by double digits lends itself to having to pass more later in games. All I know is that people saying we don't use Chubb and Hunt are wrong. Period.


The Browns were blown out of the NE game, but your argument holds no water as Chubb only had 16 carries in a game that ended up being decided by 3 points.
Although the Ravens did get up early in the 3rd, sacks were taken at very inopportune times which took us out of FG range.

Down 3, 3:00 and change left in the first half at the ravens 40. Run the ball kick FG tie game at half!!!!!!!!
Not what happened. Drop back, sack, loss of 9 yards end up punting. THIS RIGHT HERE!!!!!!!!

Run the ball period.
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
I don't think we need to rebuild. We all know we can use 2 solid DT's and another Lb. We need another WR. We add another 5 good solid players in positions of need, and we've got the team we thought we had. If we had those 2 good DT's and DW playing at his normal level from the 1st game our record would probably be reversed. JMO

I think people often times see it as an all or nothing proposition. I'm pretty much with you in regards to a rebuild. I'm also not a proponent of standing pat. I do believe there are some obvious problems but unlike some others I'm not sure where that responsibility lies. There isn't a S that can cover the pass. They certainly need at least one more legit WR, interior DL help. The LB position seems very weak. The issue is that the Browns have the cap space to have easily addressed those needs and chose not to. The drafting has not really addressed these issues. I'm certainly confident that wasn't due to a lack of effort.

But somewhere there's a disconnect. The difference between myself and many others is I'm not sure where that disconnect is located. Is it the coaching staff that hasn't made it clear to the FO what it is they need? Is it that the coaching staff lacks the ability to clearly see those needs? Is it the analytics that say these aren't position groups that deserve heavy investment in? I have no idea the answer to those questions.

There is a middle ground between rebuild and stand pat. What I think needs to happen is to retool. There is clearly a problem that even us amateurs had a rasp of. Most on this board knew we needed another legit. WR. Not some #1 WR but a proven contributor with good hands and route running. Most understood the weakness on the interior of the DL. While not nearly all, but many knew the LB position needed addressed as well. Yet it took a 2-4 record before the FO made an attempt to address the LB position. I find it quite troublesome that even many of us knew these things while nothing was being done inside the organization to address them.

With watson waiting in the wings I think what most people see as a rebuild would be foolish at this time. Having the best RB in the NFL combined with one of the top tier QB's in the league presents this team with a very rare opportunity. What needs to be repaired is recognizing and addressing the teams needs. Will that take a new DC and or a new ST's coach? I can't say I'm sure about that either way. However IMO Stefanski isn't the issue with the exception that his hand may need to be forced into making some coaching staff changes he may not wish to make.

So I can see that there may be some issues that need to be addressed. However a from the ground up rebuild I don't see needed or a wise decision with where we stand. Often times it seems to me that the most visceral reactions come from those who had unrealistic expectations to begin with. Some were predicting a lot of wins even after knowing the team would be staring a back up QB for almost two thirds of the season.

I understand the disappointment in how the games are being lost. Better teams find a way to win while lesser teams seem to find a way to lose. It is certainly frustrating to watch. But yes, a retooling is needed at some level. But that's far short of a rebuild.
Couldn't agree more with your post Pit. It seems to most of us there are issues going on behind the scenes. What exactly we don't know and who is responsible for whatever reasons we don't know but there are some issues no doubt. We can and have speculated but that's all we can do at this point.
Originally Posted by DawgPound75
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Trailing by double digits lends itself to having to pass more later in games. All I know is that people saying we don't use Chubb and Hunt are wrong. Period.


The Browns were blown out of the NE game, but your argument holds no water as Chubb only had 16 carries in a game that ended up being decided by 3 points.
Although the Ravens did get up early in the 3rd, sacks were taken at very inopportune times which took us out of FG range.

Down 3, 3:00 and change left in the first half at the ravens 40. Run the ball kick FG tie game at half!!!!!!!!
Not what happened. Drop back, sack, loss of 9 yards end up punting. THIS RIGHT HERE!!!!!!!!

Run the ball period.

I don't think 16 carries is a grossly low amount. I wouldn't want to see him carry the ball 25 times a game.
I wasn't arguing. I was presenting facts. Keep griping and complaining about everything. That will make things better.


Okay, I will not be a fan of this trade if it happens. I get trading Hunt given his status, but more importantly, the fact that we have great depth at his position. Not a fan of getting rid of top-level offensive tackles.
Hunt and Williams have next to no value.
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
I don't think we need to rebuild. We all know we can use 2 solid DT's and another Lb. We need another WR. We add another 5 good solid players in positions of need, and we've got the team we thought we had. If we had those 2 good DT's and DW playing at his normal level from the 1st game our record would probably be reversed. JMO

I think people often times see it as an all or nothing proposition. I'm pretty much with you in regards to a rebuild. I'm also not a proponent of standing pat. I do believe there are some obvious problems but unlike some others I'm not sure where that responsibility lies. There isn't a S that can cover the pass. They certainly need at least one more legit WR, interior DL help. The LB position seems very weak. The issue is that the Browns have the cap space to have easily addressed those needs and chose not to. The drafting has not really addressed these issues. I'm certainly confident that wasn't due to a lack of effort.

But somewhere there's a disconnect. The difference between myself and many others is I'm not sure where that disconnect is located. Is it the coaching staff that hasn't made it clear to the FO what it is they need? Is it that the coaching staff lacks the ability to clearly see those needs? Is it the analytics that say these aren't position groups that deserve heavy investment in? I have no idea the answer to those questions.

There is a middle ground between rebuild and stand pat. What I think needs to happen is to retool. There is clearly a problem that even us amateurs had a rasp of. Most on this board knew we needed another legit. WR. Not some #1 WR but a proven contributor with good hands and route running. Most understood the weakness on the interior of the DL. While not nearly all, but many knew the LB position needed addressed as well. Yet it took a 2-4 record before the FO made an attempt to address the LB position. I find it quite troublesome that even many of us knew these things while nothing was being done inside the organization to address them.

With watson waiting in the wings I think what most people see as a rebuild would be foolish at this time. Having the best RB in the NFL combined with one of the top tier QB's in the league presents this team with a very rare opportunity. What needs to be repaired is recognizing and addressing the teams needs. Will that take a new DC and or a new ST's coach? I can't say I'm sure about that either way. However IMO Stefanski isn't the issue with the exception that his hand may need to be forced into making some coaching staff changes he may not wish to make.

So I can see that there may be some issues that need to be addressed. However a from the ground up rebuild I don't see needed or a wise decision with where we stand. Often times it seems to me that the most visceral reactions come from those who had unrealistic expectations to begin with. Some were predicting a lot of wins even after knowing the team would be staring a back up QB for almost two thirds of the season.

I understand the disappointment in how the games are being lost. Better teams find a way to win while lesser teams seem to find a way to lose. It is certainly frustrating to watch. But yes, a retooling is needed at some level. But that's far short of a rebuild.

Solid post without the gaudy, know-it-all reactionary b.s.

I'll try to defend the FO and coaching staff from a devil's advocate point of view before I get to my version of the disconnect.

First, there is no rebuild, although I can see some possible serious changes on the horizon (player wise, especially on defense).

It's hard to argue the glaring weaknesses when we all saw them coming. I don't think there is much arguing there. The collective intellect on this board has pointed it out time and time again.

WRs? We signed a sure-handed #1.5. Landry was here 'til well after the draft. DPJ is a solid option, he passed my eye-test last year and has held up. Two solid TEs after we unloaded the baggage there. A solid RB duo is a QB's best friend. And let's not forget, best bet was Watson would be starting in week 7. I'll let them slide there without even batting an eye. But let's at least come clean with Schwartz. Throw him five passes Monday... if he doesn't catch four without looking like he's afraid of the field... just go ahead and move on. Done.

DTs? Yes, we knew there was a weakness, there also weren't any easy answers in FA (correct me if I'm wrong). Once we made the Watson deal, our pick at that position was made the way most of our middle-round picks are made. Analytics predicting upside. I've got no problem with that either.

All teams have weaknesses. Weaknesses are exacerbated when things you see as strengths simply don't hold up. The collective intellect on this board also said we were among the best secondaries in the league. Looking at talent alone, it was easy to predict that would be true. It's been anything but. Now, stack on top of talent, upside. The upside of having Delpit turn the corner while coming into camp injury free, the upside of JOK getting better in his second season. Those two players have looked lost much of the time. A blind man would have better eyeballs on many of these plays. Keep stacking... communication issues, players that talk the talk but don't walk the walk, excuses, finger-pointing. When all this crap goes down, when what you think are strengths are basically below-average... guess what the actual weaknesses look like? You got it, dog $h*t.

But lets back up a bit. A FO and aligned leadership went through (I say "went through" because Haslam pushed the chips in) something entirely uncharacteristic to their normal mindset. They quit churning the asset barrel and cashed in all draft capital. All that's left at that point is CAP. Did we really expect them to push-in all those chips as well? With a 1/4B QB contract and uncertainty to when he would even hit the field? Not just no, HELL no. Doing so under such uncertainty would be stupid.

So, along with a bunch of other things that probably would have been attacked in a different manner, we pushed the problems up the road and went into wait-and-see mode. Wait and see what happens with Watson... wait and see what we have with "all this talent".


Now, the disconnect? First, more of the devil... who says there is a disconnect? Maybe these dudes are still aligned in almost every category. Maybe they're looking at the problems for what they are and laugh at our over-reaction. Maybe they think they're on the right track and have just been unfortunate with many of the results. Maybe they know kicking the can up the road was inevitable and just want to work together through the problems and they see more and more clearly that this is, in fact, a lost season. Again -- devil's advocate there.


My real opinion on disconnect? LEADERSHIP STYLE. I still believe these guys are pretty much aligned in vision, but there's no one willing to put their fists on the table and get a little loud with what's happening on the field of play.

I won't go all long and drawn-out, (too late naughtydevil ) but it's easy to compare myself to Stefanski. I was very good at running other people's businesses but had some hard lessons to learn about leadership went I started my own. After years of dealing with abusive owners and management I thought I would just snap my fingers and have some Utopian environment where everybody just worked together and did their job. Hang signs on the wall like "Smart, Tough, Accountable" and "Play Like a Champion Today" and everything else would take care of itself. It didn't take long to realize I needed to be a lot less like Stefanski/Berry and much more like Tomlin.

I didn't run around yelling and screaming; but everyone knew when I wasn't happy. And when you didn't play like a champion, there were repercussions. Delpit and JOK would be spending some time on special teams (bussing tables) and see a reduced roll in the defense (lining their pockets as a waiter). When there were problems, I wasn't walking around playing everyone's best friend.

My management style had to be much more hard-nosed and a lot less friendly until we reached critical mass with leadership amongst the troops. I feel like we have a team full of players saying "not my problem, I'm doing my job" whether they are or not.

(I feel) we are severely lacking with leadership on the field. And much as I've experienced, that creates dissent amongst the troops. People that work hard and care, get annoyed with those that don't. With no vocal leaders, no "glue", you end of with factions and a lot of whispering and finger-pointing behind the scenes. Pretty soon, everybody is unhappy. If your leaders in management are still sitting on their hands, waiting for things to sort themselves out; you're going to have some real problems.

JMO, and certainly not saying I have it all figured out. These are just my suspicions of where the real underlying problems may lie in Berea.
j/c:


Quote
Browns Could Buy and Sell at Deadline if Opportunities are There

The Cleveland Browns could be opportunists at the NFL trading deadline, potentially in the market to add players as well as sell off some pieces to bring back draft assets.
PETE SMITH9 HOURS AGO

The two goals Cleveland Browns general manager Andrew Berry have in preparation for a pivotal offseason include reclaiming draft assets spent in acquiring quarterback Deshaun Watson and finding cost effective pieces that can at least give them options in addressing some of their areas of weakness.

As a result, the Browns have the potential to do some buying as well as selling ahead of the trade deadline. Even though the NFL trade deadline doesn't tend to be super active, teams are becoming more willing to make deals. This year, with some unexpected teams making charges toward the postseason, they could be in the market to replace injured players or bolster their chances to make a run in pursuit of a championship.

The Browns already made one trade, taking a flyer on linebacker Deion Jones in exchange for a pick swap with the Atlanta Falcons. With the loss of Anthony Walker Jr. with a leg injury, the team wanted more veteran help as Jacob Phillips was struggling. Now with Phillips likely out for the year, Jones will be the starter.

Potential Buys
Matt Ioannidis, Defensive Tackle, Carolina Panthers
The Panthers are not having a fire sale, but they are taking calls on non-essential personnel in an effort to build up their draft assets as they prepare to hire a new head coach.

Ioannidis is a solid but unspectacular defensive tackle option that is signed to a one-year deal. His base salary for the rest of the season is under a million dollars, which is a great fit for the Browns, who don't want to take on bloated contracts as they plan to rollover as much money as possible into 2023.


Much as they did in the trade for linebacker Deion Jones, the Browns would be looking to do a pick swap for Ioannidis. That might be swapping a fourth-round pick for a sixth-round pick for example. They don't want to go down on the number of picks they have, already being down so many as a result of the Watson trade, but they are willing to move down in rounds if it gets them something of worth.

Ioannidis gets a look for the rest of the year. If the two sides are happy with the arrangement, the Browns could then sign him to a new deal and keep him in Cleveland when he will be 29 years old.

Daron Payne, Defensive Tackle, Washington Commanders
The Commanders are a mess. From ownership to an embattled head coach in Ron Rivera, the team is headed nowhere fast. Payne is young and has had success, though he's not having a great year. The Browns love big bodies that can rush the passer and Payne can, but could stand to be more consistent against the run.

Payne's base salary is a hair over $8.5 million. The Browns would owe him whatever's left on the deal, which would nearly half. It's not ideal in terms of what the Browns want to do salary-wise this year. It would also mean the Browns then plan to extend Payne to make sense.

Payne is poised to hit the free agent market at 26 years old. He could end up getting a bigger payday than his play might warrant, which is why the Browns might be inclined to make a move to secure his services early.


Once again, the Browns are likely to want to make a pick swap rather than give up a selection. However, that might be more difficult to do here unless the Browns are willing to trade down from one of the few early picks they have.

Shy Tuttle, Defensive Tackle, New Orleans Saints
Tuttle is going to be a free agent after this season and the Saints continue to deal with horrific cap issues. The Saints may not be enthusiastic about trading a starting defensive tackle but the team is riddled with injuries in addition to poor quarterback play. If the team is of the opinion that the team is going to get worse rather than better, they might be interested in adding draft capital as they continue to work through the post-Drew Brees era.

The Browns would owe Tuttle the remainder of a $2.43 million base salary. He's going to be 28 years old next year and could be another option to potentially bolster their interior.

Sellable Assets
Kareem Hunt, Running Back
From the moment the season was set to begin Hunt always made sense as a player the Browns could move. Holding onto him until the trade deadline might have been the prudent move as there are teams still looking for running back.


Additionally, some teams have suffered some catastrophic injuries while in position to make a run for the postseason. The San Francisco 49ers acquired Christian McCaffrey from the Carolina Panthers and the New York Jets added James Robinson from the Jacksonville Jaguars. The Los Angeles Rams are a team that has been openly looking for help in the backfield, but there may be others in search of a valuable complimentary back like the Buffalo Bills.


Hunt is an average runner, but a good blocker and pass catcher. He's someone that a team can consistently have on the field and benefit. He's better suited to play in a heavy gap scheme to compensate for a lack of vision.

The Browns aren't likely to get some huge haul for Hunt, but they could get themselves a day three pick for his services. It could be a fifth round pick or perhaps a conditional pick. If the Browns are getting offered anything more than that, it's a bonus.

The other thing that makes Hunt interesting is that one of the reasons he's attractive is his low contract figure. The team acquiring him would only owe him what's left of his $1.35 million base salary. He is scheduled to be a free agent.


At 28 years old and a history of injuries, it's hard to believe that Hunt will be fielding massive contract offers. They might be able to offer him a larger role, but Hunt really is best suited to be a utility back as opposed to a featured one. Maybe the Browns love what they see from Jerome Ford and D'Ernest Johnson. They may even look to draft another back. Don't be so sure Hunt couldn't effectively be rented out the rest of this year and return in 2023.

Greedy Williams, Corner
Williams missed the start of the season with a hamstring injury and the Browns have have move on. Rookie corner Martin Emerson is a contrast in styles that allows the Browns to present different looks. He's been pretty solid as a rookie and is improving as he gains experience.

Williams played against the Baltimore Ravens in limited role, but when Denzel Ward returns from injury, Williams may not see the field at all. Injuries have been the biggest issue for Williams, but he's played good football including much of last season.

Williams still offers excellent speed and good length for the position. He's well suited for a heavy man scheme that can let their corner play up and just run with receivers. Williams tends to be too conservative in off man coverage, taking false steps and plays like he's afraid to get beat deep.


Williams is in the final year of his contract and there's virtually no chance he will be re-signed. This is a situation where the Browns are weighing what teams might offer for Williams now versus what they project he will get in free agency that determines his compensatory value. The fear is that the team he signs with will want him to sign a one-year prove it deal, which could limit what the Browns would get back in 2024.

Jack Conklin, Offensive Tackle
Conklin is playing well and looks healthy coming off of a serious knee injury. The Browns planned ahead for life after Conklin by drafting James Hudson in 2021. He struggled as a rookie after being pressed into action due to Conkling going out for the season. When Hudson has played in 2022 before Conklin was ready to go, he played reasonably well.

With the Browns looking to cut costs, this becomes a natural pivot point for the Browns. So long as Hudson continues to grow and improve, the Browns will maintain the quality of the line at a lower cost. The Browns just did this with J.C. Tretter and Nick Harris at center. Harris then got injured, so now they have Ethan Pocic holding down the pivot.


There are a number of teams using rookie tackles either due to injury or ineffectiveness to veteran options. That might make a team perhaps pay a little more for someone like Conklin, then likely to sign him to an extension. If the offer is high enough, potentially a third round pick or more, they could be willing to move him.

The rub is that if the Browns do indeed let Conklin walk in free agency, he's likely to sign a lucrative deal which will then give the Browns a compensatory pick. Given the rarity of premium tackle options, it would be a surprise if the Browns don't get a third or fourth round pick selection in 2024, especially if teams feel confident Conklin will improve the further away he gets from the injury. The Browns might be happy to get a pick in 2024 and could price that into a negotiation now.

D'Ernest Johnson, Running Back
Johnson wants to play, understandably. The Browns don't have a lot of touches to give him, so he's mostly on special teams if he's active at all.

Johnson isn't a great receiver or blocker, but he is at least functional in those roles. That's why Kareem Hunt plays over him. However, Johnson has been a productive runner, averaging 5.3 yards per carry on 137 career carries.


His vision is a great fit for a zone scheme. He's got a good burst, churns his legs through contact and fights for every yard. His contract is cheap and he's a player that shouldn't cost much to retain if the team that gets him is happy with the impact, becoming a valuable role player in a rotation.

Johnson could fetch a late day three pick, likely in the sixth or seventh round.

https://www.si.com/nfl/browns/browns-maven-features/browns-could-be-buyers-and-sellers
Now we're looking for DT's. Why didn't we start in the summer. We knew then it was a position of weakness.
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Now we're looking for DT's. Why didn't we start in the summer. We knew then it was a position of weakness.

Now they're looking for DT's. Why didn't they start in the summer ? They knew then it was a position of weakness.

Did they know ? or was it they believed what Woods felt was the best type of DT for his scheme ?

They see and know things in a different way then

We us or I as a fan. Sometimes I believe we us or I, well not me really lol

Are smarter than them !
I understand the love for Hunt

I also know the NFL is a business, oops we all know that, Right ?

I've also seen how good teams know when to part ways with a player when necessary for the team to keep being successful

Fan favorites or teammate favorites they did it and they knew how to.

Hunt is a favorite and he was a good thing for the team and the fans as was others

I think about how a group of RB's like Chubb Johnson and Ford who are big hard hitting and fast

Can just pound away at a D that by the 4th quarter the D is beaten and exhausted.

Who knows, it's Cleveland
Originally Posted by Floquinho
Other GMs knows that Berry is desperate and that will reflect Kareem and Greedy’s trade value. Apart from bad timing this once again gives vibes about another panic move from the Browns FO.

Why am I not surprised….

That doesn’t make any sense. The FO DOES NOT have to trade either of them if they don’t want and still get possible compensation.
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog


Okay, I will not be a fan of this trade if it happens. I get trading Hunt given his status, but more importantly, the fact that we have great depth at his position. Not a fan of getting rid of top-level offensive tackles.
Conklin as elite as his skill level is, can't stay off the IR.
James Hudson has not played bad at all in his place.
In fact Hudson is lights better this year when you remember
He got abused by T.J Watt last year.
Hudson has upside , and doesn't cost as much as Conklin.
Football is a business too. I don't think the Browns front
Office feels they are getting their money's worth out of JC.
If Joe Woods thought he had what he needed at DT he was probably the only one that felt that way. Most posters on this forum and even some analysts on the sports shows mentioned our talent deficiency at DT and even WR.
Originally Posted by DeisleDawg
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Now we're looking for DT's. Why didn't we start in the summer. We knew then it was a position of weakness.

Now they're looking for DT's. Why didn't they start in the summer ? They knew then it was a position of weakness.

Did they know ? or was it they believed what Woods felt was the best type of DT for his scheme ?

They see and know things in a different way then

We us or I as a fan. Sometimes I believe we us or I, well not me really lol

Are smarter than them !

No, our DTs don't fit Woods 4-2-5 defense. It's the one spot in that particular defense that requires big, space-eating, block-occupying, guys.

Also, us fans are definitely not "smarter" than they are.
trading Conklin might become a necessary evil. Maybe we think Hudson can fill in well enough and we can save some cap space, which will be needed now
This is just my opinion. I know the record is not good. However, I think this team is much better than what some people are saying. There was only one game we got beat up on the scoreboard, but even that game could have went the other way had Green not been out of bounds on the Onside kick. Losing close games one year is similar to teams who get a bunch of turnovers in a year. The trend often turns in the next year.

We will have an elite QB next year. I think it would be a huge mistake to start creating holes. The salary cap thing is so overrated. Not saying it isn't a factor, but we are in good shape and teams rarely are destroyed by the salary cap anymore. It used to be a much bigger factor than it is now.

I understand trading Hunt because we have Chubb, DEJ, and the rook. While Hudson played well enough at the start of the year, people on here hated him last year. Conklin is an elite tackle. I would not trade him. I realize my opinion doesn't matter to the Browns. I'm just voicing my opinion. There is no way that I agree w/all the doom and gloom posters on this board. This team is close and I think we have a real shot next year if we don't start getting rid of real talent.
Just remember that Conklin is in the last year of his deal just like Hunt is except the Browns will be getting a cap hit of 3M per year for the next two years because of the void years Berry put in Conklin's deal. I guess the question is for both of these guys, are the Browns even considering resigning them (Conklin age 30) and/or (Hunt age 28)? If not and they're throwing away this season, then get some picks for these guys if you can. The big issue I see is the Browns already are in need of multiple FS's, 2-DT's minimum, DE replacement for Clowney, multiple LB's, multiple WR's, a LT if Wills keeps laying stinkers like last game (PFF 32.9), RT for Conklin, and more backups than I can count. This team is looking at some major restructure coming this off season with no 1st round pick. If they're not going to trade Conklin or Hunt, they better get them under contract before January or these guys will be darting out of Cleveland. JMHO
I believe the thought process with trading Conklin is that he is gone next year regardless. Get some value now and let Hudson get the reps in a season that is all but over. It is highly unlikely the Browns re-sign Conklin to a new deal. They have a lot of money tied up in Bitonio and Teller. Additionally, the Browns are going to have to decide on whether or not to pick up Wills 5th year option. In all likelihood they will and that's an additional $13M in salary next year tied up in the OL. Conklin will be able to make more on the open market than what the Browns will be willing to offer.

I'd say its a pretty safe bet that Hudson is the starting RT next year.
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Originally Posted by DeisleDawg
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Now we're looking for DT's. Why didn't we start in the summer. We knew then it was a position of weakness.

Now they're looking for DT's. Why didn't they start in the summer ? They knew then it was a position of weakness.

Did they know ? or was it they believed what Woods felt was the best type of DT for his scheme ?

They see and know things in a different way then

We us or I as a fan. Sometimes I believe we us or I, well not me really lol

Are smarter than them !

No, our DTs don't fit Woods 4-2-5 defense. It's the one spot in that particular defense that requires big, space-eating, block-occupying, guys.

Also, us fans are definitely not "smarter" than they are.

Question...are we going to pretend that the DT talent the Browns are putting on the field is not the talent Woods had a hand in selecting?

These are the guys Woods wanted...Jordan Elliot was a 3rd round pick in 2020 and Woods was the DC at that time...this is his guy..!!

Woods wanted DT Taven Bryan in free agency..Bryan was a 1st round draft choice of Jags in 2018

The Browns drafted DT, Tommy Togiai in 4th round of the 2021 draft with input from Woods.

In the 2022 draft, the Browns used a 4th round (#108) draft pick on DT, Perrion Winfrey...again, with Woods as the Browns DC.
Three of the Browns top 4 draft picks of 2022 were in support of Woods defensive side of the ball.

Woods has had 3 years to develop the DT position, with the GM adding talent via free agency and the draft. Let's not pretend that Woods had NO INPUT into who GM Berry brought in in free agency and who was drafted to help Woods man the DT position of the Browns.



Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
This is just my opinion. I know the record is not good. However, I think this team is much better than what some people are saying. There was only one game we got beat up on the scoreboard, but even that game could have went the other way had Green not been out of bounds on the Onside kick. Losing close games one year is similar to teams who get a bunch of turnovers in a year. The trend often turns in the next year.

We will have an elite QB next year. I think it would be a huge mistake to start creating holes. The salary cap thing is so overrated. Not saying it isn't a factor, but we are in good shape and teams rarely are destroyed by the salary cap anymore. It used to be a much bigger factor than it is now.

I understand trading Hunt because we have Chubb, DEJ, and the rook. While Hudson played well enough at the start of the year, people on here hated him last year. Conklin is an elite tackle. I would not trade him. I realize my opinion doesn't matter to the Browns. I'm just voicing my opinion. There is no way that I agree w/all the doom and gloom posters on this board. This team is close and I think we have a real shot next year if we don't start getting rid of real talent.

I think you need look no further than the LA Rams, GB Packers and TB Bucs this year as to what happens when your line or skill players are not up to snuff. Watson or not, if the Browns do not fix WR they will be in trouble again next year. Like all 3 of the above, putting a body out there at the OT spot does not make up for the skill level you just lost. IMHO, the Browns are looking at the strong possibility of having to replace both tackles next year. Conklin because he's a FA and the Browns won't pay him and Wills because he has not come close to earning his 5th year option and last week showed how poorly he can play (PFF 32.9). Truthfully, as a team, you cannot accept that level of play from your healthy LT. Add into that at least 5 bonafide starting spots on defense and the Browns could be trotting out lessor talent than they are this year, and this year has exposed some serious issues. I will be interested to see what Berry does (if he's still here) but all indications were this was a playoff team this year with Watson and IMHO, I don't see the supporting cast that proves that.
j/c...

Originally Posted by Milk Man
I believe the thought process with trading Conklin is that he is gone next year regardless. Get some value now and let Hudson get the reps in a season that is all but over. It is highly unlikely the Browns re-sign Conklin to a new deal. They have a lot of money tied up in Bitonio and Teller. Additionally, the Browns are going to have to decide on whether or not to pick up Wills 5th year option. In all likelihood they will and that's an additional $13M in salary next year tied up in the OL. Conklin will be able to make more on the open market than what the Browns will be willing to offer.

I'd say its a pretty safe bet that Hudson is the starting RT next year.

I understand that logic and I'm pretty sure that is how the Browns view it. I am not claiming to be correct, but I have never believed in creating holes. If you have a really good guy waiting in the wings [see DEJ at RB] than it makes sense to me. I still think this team can contend next year for it all. There are no guarantees about such things, but this team is not nearly as bad as some claim they are.

I'm not mad or stomping my feet. The salary cap thing is vastly overrated in today's game.
Originally Posted by ScottPlayersFacemask
Originally Posted by Floquinho
Other GMs knows that Berry is desperate and that will reflect Kareem and Greedy’s trade value. Apart from bad timing this once again gives vibes about another panic move from the Browns FO.

Why am I not surprised….

That doesn’t make any sense. The FO DOES NOT have to trade either of them if they don’t want and still get possible compensation.

Maybe I’m ignorant but if they don’t trade any player then who’s going to compensate us?

Isn’t Hunts contract situation common knowledge and us dumping him and others in the middle of the season is in my world a sign og weakness. Maybe I totally misunderstood these trades but if so please enlighten me why these trades are so good? Getting a late round pick in the next draft is better then nothing but at the same time we lose solid good players. From my perspective it’s a little bit of a gamble and a sign that this season is lost but as Vers (the expert) often point out what do I know?
Originally Posted by Floquinho
Maybe I’m ignorant but if they don’t trade any player then who’s going to compensate us?


https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-compensatory-draft-picks-what-you-need-to-know
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Originally Posted by DeisleDawg
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Now we're looking for DT's. Why didn't we start in the summer. We knew then it was a position of weakness.

Now they're looking for DT's. Why didn't they start in the summer ? They knew then it was a position of weakness.

Did they know ? or was it they believed what Woods felt was the best type of DT for his scheme ?

They see and know things in a different way then

We us or I as a fan. Sometimes I believe we us or I, well not me really lol

Are smarter than them !

No, our DTs don't fit Woods 4-2-5 defense. It's the one spot in that particular defense that requires big, space-eating, block-occupying, guys.

Also, us fans are definitely not "smarter" than they are.


I was kind of speaking in the terms of most fans from the beginning of the draft and there on questioned why bigger DT's were not drafted or picked up in FA

I said in another post that most OT's are bigger than the DT's on the Browns team.

I feel that the people involved fell into Woods bs on who he wanted as DT's on his Defense

Clearly most of us wanted bigger tougher DT's from the get go

The FO gave Woods the DT's he wanted

Most fans weren't happy with the undersized guys

So whose smarter , Us or them ? lol in a way ya know !

Still not sure if it's the DT's or the scheme or what it is

6-4 290 291 and 303 and 6-2 296

That's the DT's
Originally Posted by jfanent
Originally Posted by Floquinho
Maybe I’m ignorant but if they don’t trade any player then who’s going to compensate us?


https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-compensatory-draft-picks-what-you-need-to-know

I hope the FO isn't counting their chickens with the compensatory pick thing. First thing is that guys like Hunt and Greedy - if they brought compensatory picks at all - would create comp picks in the '24 draft...not next year.

Secondly, with no first rd picks for two more drafts, we will need to be players in free agency to bolster the roster for a playoff window - that is already closing. If we sign more value than we lose (in free agency). the comp picks won't be coming our way.

Bird in the hand.
Originally Posted by DeisleDawg
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Originally Posted by DeisleDawg
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Now we're looking for DT's. Why didn't we start in the summer. We knew then it was a position of weakness.

Now they're looking for DT's. Why didn't they start in the summer ? They knew then it was a position of weakness.

Did they know ? or was it they believed what Woods felt was the best type of DT for his scheme ?

They see and know things in a different way then

We us or I as a fan. Sometimes I believe we us or I, well not me really lol

Are smarter than them !

No, our DTs don't fit Woods 4-2-5 defense. It's the one spot in that particular defense that requires big, space-eating, block-occupying, guys.

Also, us fans are definitely not "smarter" than they are.


I was kind of speaking in the terms of most fans from the beginning of the draft and there on questioned why bigger DT's were not drafted or picked up in FA

I said in another post that most OT's are bigger than the DT's on the Browns team.

I feel that the people involved fell into Woods bs on who he wanted as DT's on his Defense

Clearly most of us wanted bigger tougher DT's from the get go

The FO gave Woods the DT's he wanted

Most fans weren't happy with the undersized guys

So whose smarter , Us or them ? lol in a way ya know !

Still not sure if it's the DT's or the scheme or what it is

6-4 290 291 and 303 and 6-2 296

That's the DT's

Your points there are very difficult to refute.
I know it's hard to keep up w/all the posts on this board, bro. I will tell you that I posted several times about DTs in the 4-2-5. bone's thread before the season about Woods' defense and I think again in another Woods thread.

The 4-2-5 uses a lot of more athletic, mobile, agile guys who can run sideline to sideline. More safeties and fewer LBers on the field is more typical than the other way around. Thus, the D as a whole is light. The one exception to that is that DTs are supposed to be big. They are there to play the run. They take up space and are supposed to eat up blocks and keep the smaller guys free.

We have not provided those types of DTs to Woods. I highly, highly doubt that he has asked for the kind of DTs we have had on our roster. He's an easy target and/or fall guy. I am not sure if he is a good DC or not. I just don't see any evidence where the scheme is a huge problem. You can identify liabilities in every single defense out there, but that doesn't mean it's a bad scheme. It's not like we're running a 50 defense and play Cover 0 all the time. I posted an article earlier that 28% of the league has coaches that came from the same tree that produced Woods. That doesn't mean he is good. It simply means that saying the scheme sucks is something some dudes on here fabricated.
Originally Posted by mac
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Originally Posted by DeisleDawg
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Now we're looking for DT's. Why didn't we start in the summer. We knew then it was a position of weakness.

Now they're looking for DT's. Why didn't they start in the summer ? They knew then it was a position of weakness.

Did they know ? or was it they believed what Woods felt was the best type of DT for his scheme ?

They see and know things in a different way then

We us or I as a fan. Sometimes I believe we us or I, well not me really lol

Are smarter than them !

No, our DTs don't fit Woods 4-2-5 defense. It's the one spot in that particular defense that requires big, space-eating, block-occupying, guys.

Also, us fans are definitely not "smarter" than they are.

Question...are we going to pretend that the DT talent the Browns are putting on the field is not the talent Woods had a hand in selecting?

These are the guys Woods wanted...Jordan Elliot was a 3rd round pick in 2020 and Woods was the DC at that time...this is his guy..!!

Woods wanted DT Taven Bryan in free agency..Bryan was a 1st round draft choice of Jags in 2018

The Browns drafted DT, Tommy Togiai in 4th round of the 2021 draft with input from Woods.

In the 2022 draft, the Browns used a 4th round (#108) draft pick on DT, Perrion Winfrey...again, with Woods as the Browns DC.
Three of the Browns top 4 draft picks of 2022 were in support of Woods defensive side of the ball.

Woods has had 3 years to develop the DT position, with the GM adding talent via free agency and the draft. Let's not pretend that Woods had NO INPUT into who GM Berry brought in in free agency and who was drafted to help Woods man the DT position of the Browns.




Well, if I want you to make a gourmet meal and send you to 7/11 with the shopping list...
Vers I believe the DT's we've been looking at to bring in are much bigger than what we have now am I right?
Originally Posted by mac
Question...are we going to pretend that the DT talent the Browns are putting on the field is not the talent Woods had a hand in selecting?

These are the guys Woods wanted...Jordan Elliot was a 3rd round pick in 2020 and Woods was the DC at that time...this is his guy..!!

Woods wanted DT Taven Bryan in free agency..Bryan was a 1st round draft choice of Jags in 2018

The Browns drafted DT, Tommy Togiai in 4th round of the 2021 draft with input from Woods.

I think you need to make up your mind. There is a vast difference between having input and a player being "his guy".

What you seem to be suggesting is that the coaching staff gets to hand pick the draft picks they want and the FO simply picks those players without considering their analytics departments assessment. It appears as though you want to have it both ways. You have consistently railed against and blamed many of the teams woes on being too heavily invested in following the analytics and not the player. Which is possible. I'm not sure on that because there does have to be a delicate balance between analytics and what a player is doing on film as it pertains to his ability to perform.

Now you wish to blame Woods for the picks. So it would look like on the surface you need to make up your mind which way this all works. Are you suggesting that Barry, DePodesta and the analytics department simply sit back and draft/sign a wish list of players that the coaching staff hands them? If so Haslam is handing out a lot of Benjamans for that FO to ignore what is supposed to be their specialty. And are you suggesting that Woods is telling the FO that he wants them to wait until the middle rounds of the draft with which to address the interior DL?

I don't think these are "Woods guys". Now if it's as Vers suggests and these players do not fit the scheme, it is possible that Woods is asking for players that are not best suited to play in his own defense. But even that wouldn't make a lot of sense to me.

So no, I don't think Woods is telling them to wait until the middle of the draft to address the position. I don't think that Woods is simply saying which players he wants and Berry just fills his list. It's up to the FO as to where in the draft they invest on any given position. It's up to them how much of the salary cap they invest at each position. It's their analytics and player assessments that determine which players they draft and sign.

Don't get me wrong I'm not saying some of the defensive woes haven't been at least partly on Woods. But there are things that make sense on what he may be blamed for and things that don't make sense to blame him for. In this case it doesn't make sense.

Blaming the chef because he was given crappy ingredients is a road I won't be traveling down.
I can't remember if it was Berry or KS but at one time one of them mentioned that they prefer smaller penetrating DTs over the bigger run stopping type and that's a huge problem for us because they also prefer smaller fast LBs. If you don't have at least one pretty good penetrating DT than you have no one that the opposing Oline needs to double team which allows that extra Olineman to get to the next level and take out our smaller LBs. Bryan is the best we have as a penetrating DT and he's at best a backup on a good team, I thought Elliott was going to be a good player but his play has just been so uninspiring, and Togiai is a really undersized run stopping type DT. With smaller fast LBs you either need 2 good penetrating DTs, or an Aaron Donald, or at least one run stopping DT type who can tie up 2 blockers.
I think so. Typically, they aren't guys who penetrate a lot and make a ton of plays in the backfield. Instead, they eat up blocks and clog up the middle which allows the faster guys to run around and make plays. It seems like bigger guys would be better at that. I never ran or even coached against the 4-2-5 back in my day, so I had to do a lot of research. I'll see if I can round up some of the articles I read when I have more time. I'm working on our advertising package for next month today, so I am only coming on here to take a break every once in awhile. The numbers get hard on the eyes after awhile.
So maybe the schemes ok it's just that we don't have all the right personnel.
Perhaps. I'm not sold on Woods yet. I've been watching closer since the Jets game. I haven't seen anything glaring in regards to scheme, but TV looks are limited. Plays like the Burns video that I posted on the Woods and the Defense thread are what really is needed to make better evaluations. There was nothing wrong w/the scheme there at all. There was plenty of poor execution by at least 3 players, maybe four if you include Bryan. Woods could have other issues beyond scheme, though. He is probably fighting for his job.

The guy who bugs me is Priefer, the Special Teams coach. I see plenty of issues that are on him. I guess he is a very upbeat guy, but damn.....some of his decisions boggle my mind. I'm not saying I know more than he does, because I don't.
Here is an excerpt from a larger article on the 4-2-5.​The 4-2-5 defensive alignment starts up front with the big guys. Check the link out for further information about the 4-2-5, as well as a graphic that shows how the DL lines up. It's interesting to see a NT who shades the center/guard and a DT who is aligned to the outside shoulder of the guard on the opposite side. I'm pretty sure that's just base and that we move those guys around to a more traditional 40 look.





There are four “down” linemen in this formation, and while it looks like a more traditional base defensive alignment, it throws a few wrenches into that categorization.

For the most part, the make-up and skillset of each of the players on the defensive line in a 4-2-5 defense are vastly different than in a base defense with four down linemen.

With one notable exception:

The nose tackle.

The nose tackle in a 4-2-5 defense could be perhaps the most important position on the field. That’s because the nose tackle might be the only “big body” the defense has on the field.

All the other players could be on the smaller side, exchanging size for speed and athleticism.

The role of the nose tackle is to clog up the middle of the offensive line and take on literally as many blockers as he possibly can. His initial lining up position will be somewhere between the center and the guard.

It’s not necessarily important that the nose tackle put pressure on the quarterback or make any stops in the run game himself at all.

His responsibility is to take on blockers to create holes for linebackers to plug or for them to blitz into. That’s why it’s really important the nose tackle is a very big, strong player who can take a pounding.


The other defensive tackle in the 4-2-5 system will often line up on the outside shoulder of the other offensive guard.

This is because the nose tackle should be handling the center and the other guard by himself.

This other defensive tackle’s job is to create pressure from the down position, getting into either the A or B gap on his side of the center.


https://footballadvantage.com/4-2-5-defense/
Quote
Now you wish to blame Woods for the picks. So it would look like on the surface you need to make up your mind which way this all works. Are you suggesting that Barry, DePodesta and the analytics department simply sit back and draft/sign a wish list of players that the coaching staff hands them?


PIT...Woods would not have taken the job as DC if he did not have some input into the kind of players he wanted Berry to draft and based on that "reality" Woods does have input and also has some responsibility for the type of DTs Berry is drafting to play his defense...kind of common sense..!

Hopefully Depo had nothing to do with judging DLine talent.
That's pretty much what I said. He may very well tell the FO what type of players he wants. But IMO that's about the extent of it. He isn't telling them to only address it with mid round talent. He isn't telling them not to go after help in the FA market. I don't see how that makes the players on the roster "his guys".
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
That's pretty much what I said. He may very well tell the FO what type of players he wants. But IMO that's about the extent of it. He isn't telling them to only address it with mid round talent. He isn't telling them not to go after help in the FA market. I don't see how that makes the players on the roster "his guys".

Pit...yea, we were pretty much saying the same thing...but let's not act as if Woods didn't have a say into what players he preferred.

IMO, it was obvious that Woods wanted small quick DTs vs run stopping, 330 pound DTs, who could bench 225 33 times. Like I said, let's not act like Woods didn't take the Browns DC job without telling the Browns what he needed to make his defense work.

The Browns LBers are on the small quick side, too...JOK and Fields drafted in 2021, both 220#.

Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
So maybe the schemes ok it's just that we don't have all the right personnel.
What year is this then? Is it 20I6 again? Is it 20I7 again? I thought all of that personnel stuff got figured out?
Originally Posted by dawg66
I can't remember if it was Berry or KS but at one time one of them mentioned that they prefer smaller penetrating DTs over the bigger run stopping type and that's a huge problem for us because they also prefer smaller fast LBs. If you don't have at least one pretty good penetrating DT than you have no one that the opposing Oline needs to double team which allows that extra Olineman to get to the next level and take out our smaller LBs. Bryan is the best we have as a penetrating DT and he's at best a backup on a good team, I thought Elliott was going to be a good player but his play has just been so uninspiring, and Togiai is a really undersized run stopping type DT. With smaller fast LBs you either need 2 good penetrating DTs, or an Aaron Donald, or at least one run stopping DT type who can tie up 2 blockers.

It doesn't seem like we have those penetrating DT's either
I guess not but in all fairness it takes a good 3 tries before we get anything right. thumbsup
Wow, sounds like this FO is throwing in the towel this season. Quiters.
Originally Posted by OldColdDawg
Wow, sounds like this FO is throwing in the towel this season. Quiters.

I don't feel that way
Originally Posted by Dawgs4Life
trading Conklin might become a necessary evil. Maybe we think Hudson can fill in well enough and we can save some cap space, which will be needed now

I don't see it as an evil if it has been decided we can't/won't extend him a few years. It's just a reality at this point.
Quote
Pit...yea, we were pretty much saying the same thing...but let's not act as if Woods didn't have a say into what players he preferred.

IMO, it was obvious that Woods wanted small quick DTs vs run stopping, 330 pound DTs, who could bench 225 33 times. Like I said, let's not act like Woods didn't take the Browns DC job without telling the Browns what he needed to make his defense work.

This is an opinion, but there is absolutely no evidence to give credence to that opinion. As I have tried to show you, the 4-2-5 wants a big, heavy guy in the middle. It's sad that you and a handful of others have reached the point where you are willing to make things up in order to build up the momentum to have men get fired. These men have families and have worked their entire lives to get to this point. Presenting facts is one thing. Fabricating things like you and the other fans of an ex-player do is quite another. It's shameful.
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Quote
Pit...yea, we were pretty much saying the same thing...but let's not act as if Woods didn't have a say into what players he preferred.

IMO, it was obvious that Woods wanted small quick DTs vs run stopping, 330 pound DTs, who could bench 225 33 times. Like I said, let's not act like Woods didn't take the Browns DC job without telling the Browns what he needed to make his defense work.

This is an opinion, but there is absolutely no evidence to give credence to that opinion. As I have tried to show you, the 4-2-5 wants a big, heavy guy in the middle.

What? No evidence? The evidence is that we still don't have the big NT that a 4-2-5 requires. If Woods IS NOT clamoring for that big NT, that's worse than him just rolling out the same damn scheme with the wrong players. No evidence...nah...just none that you want to acknowledge.


Quote
It's sad that you and a handful of others have reached the point where you are willing to make things up in order to build up the momentum to have men get fired. These men have families and have worked their entire lives to get to this point. Presenting facts is one thing. Fabricating things like you and the other fans of an ex-player do is quite another. It's shameful.

That is rich, rich irony coming from YOUR keyboard. rofl
Originally Posted by WSU Willie
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Quote
Pit...yea, we were pretty much saying the same thing...but let's not act as if Woods didn't have a say into what players he preferred.

IMO, it was obvious that Woods wanted small quick DTs vs run stopping, 330 pound DTs, who could bench 225 33 times. Like I said, let's not act like Woods didn't take the Browns DC job without telling the Browns what he needed to make his defense work.

This is an opinion, but there is absolutely no evidence to give credence to that opinion. As I have tried to show you, the 4-2-5 wants a big, heavy guy in the middle.

What? No evidence? The evidence is that we still don't have the big NT that a 4-2-5 requires. If Woods IS NOT clamoring for that big NT, that's worse than him just rolling out the same damn scheme with the wrong players. No evidence...nah...just none that you want to acknowledge.


Quote
It's sad that you and a handful of others have reached the point where you are willing to make things up in order to build up the momentum to have men get fired. These men have families and have worked their entire lives to get to this point. Presenting facts is one thing. Fabricating things like you and the other fans of an ex-player do is quite another. It's shameful.

That is rich, rich irony coming from YOUR keyboard. rofl

So, let me get this straight. Am I to assume that depending which list (good or bad) that you fall on depending on "The Word of Vers" dictates whether you should be given consideration to the individual families and whether what they have done to this point in their life constitutes working their whole life to get to that point. Rich, rich irony indeed!
j/c:

I understand that the Browns might be sellers as the trade deadline approaches. The Hunt rumors make sense. I don't agree w/them trading Conklin, but I get the logic that Milk spoke to. I kinda think trading Greedy makes no sense at all.

I also think that there is a chance that we might be buyers. I posted a tweet the other day about that very thing. Here is a decent article that talks about some of the guys who might become available. Note: Robert Quinn is on the list, but he was traded to the Eagles yesterday.


Quote
Players to watch ahead of the 2022 NFL trade deadline

Chicago, Illinois, USA; Houston Texans wide receiver Brandin Cooks (13) signals first down after a catch in the first quarter against the Chicago Bears at Soldier Field. Mandatory Credit: Daniel Bartel-USA TODAY Sports

By Ari Meirov
Oct 26, 2022
• RBs Kareem Hunt and Cam Akers still options: There has been rumored trade interest surrounding both for some time now, and the trade deadline could spur action on that front.

• Chase Claypool the odd man out in Pittsburgh?: With Diontae Johnson already extended and rookie George Pickens emerging as a legitimate threat, Claypool's time with the Steelers may come to an end.

• Broncos could be big sellers: Wide receivers Jerry Jeudy and K.J. Hamler and edge defender Bradley Chubb have all been rumored as potential trade pieces.

ESTIMATED READING TIME: 7 MINS
The NFL trade deadline was once a non-story. It would just come and go.

We still haven’t reached MLB or NBA trade-deadline territory, but times have changed. General managers are more aggressive, and teams are far more open to trading future assets.

We’ve already seen two running backs change teams, with the Carolina Panthers dealing Christian McCaffrey to the San Francisco 49ers and the Jacksonville Jaguars dealing James Robinson to the New York Jets. And we might just be getting started.

The Week 8 outcomes could determine which way some teams eventually sway. A 2-5 squad might feel better about themselves if they’re 3-5 rather than 2-6. But teams have been calling around and trying to feel out where other clubs stand in the trade market. And as the saying goes, “deadlines spur action…”

Let’s take a look at some players who could be traded ahead of the Nov. 1 deadline.



EDGE ROBERT QUINN, CHICAGO BEARS
Quinn put together a breakout year last season with a franchise-record 18.5 sacks. With a new regime coming in, the Bears traded Khalil Mack in the offseason — and Quinn also garnered interest. The Bears opted to keep him, but they might have some regrets. So far this season, Quinn has just one sack and two quarterback hits, and his 43.8 PFF grade is a career-low mark.

While a potential trade return might not be as great as it would've been in the offseason, teams are always looking for pass-rush help and Quinn has proven throughout his career that he can be productive.

Quinn has roughly $8 million remaining on his $12.8 million base salary this season. The Bears could eat some (or most) of that to better the compensation, similar to what the Denver Broncos did last year when they traded Von Miller. Quinn’s 2023 and 2024 salaries are non-guaranteed, giving an acquiring team some flexibility.

RB KAREEM HUNT, CLEVELAND BROWNS
Hunt requested a trade during training camp, but the team quickly said it wouldn't deal him. He’s in the final year of his contract and extension talks have not gone far. Cleveland has a disappointing 2-5 record on the year with a tough stretch of games ahead against the Cincinnati Bengals, Miami Dolphins, Buffalo Bills and Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

Hunt played a season-low 28 snaps on Sunday. His 62.3 PFF grade is the lowest of his career. With all the draft compensation Cleveland gave up to acquire quarterback Deshaun Watson (who returns in Week 13), moving Hunt could become a real option considering the circumstances.

WR CHASE CLAYPOOL, PITTSBURGH STEELERS
The Steelers extended Diontae Johnson this offseason and have seen star potential out of rookie George Pickens. That leaves questions around Chase Claypool, who has a year and a half remaining on his rookie contract. Would Pittsburgh want to extend him after this season — especially considering their great track record with receivers in the draft?

The answer is likely no, opening the door for the team to at least consider a deal now. The former second-round pick has caught just 28 passes for 266 yards and one touchdown through seven games after racking up 850-plus yards in each of his first two seasons. Pittsburgh sits at 2-5 on the year and is set to take on the undefeated Eagles this week. Teams have called about Claypool, and if Pittsburgh is willing to drop the price a little, it could get interesting.

WR BRANDIN COOKS, HOUSTON TEXANS
It feels like Cooks has been in trade talks his entire career, despite being a very consistent offensive weapon and a solid professional. In fact, Cooks has been traded three times. Another would tie Eric Dickerson for most trades in one career.

There were talks about a potential trade this past offseason, but Houston eventually extended Cooks on a two-year, $40 million contract. The Texans won’t trade him for 75 cents on the dollar, but they still have an eye toward the future, and adding more premier draft capital could be tempting if that offer comes.

RB CAM AKERS, LOS ANGELES RAMS
Head coach Sean McVay reiterated this week that the team is still trying to trade Akers after the two sides were at odds regarding his usage. McVay also said there’s a scenario Akers where could be back, but at this point, that seems like something a coach would say just to maintain any leverage.

The Rams offered Akers along with their package of picks to the Carolina Panthers for Christian McCaffrey before Carolina ultimately took San Francisco‘s offer. Los Angeles will keep trying as the deadline nears.

EDGE MARCUS DAVENPORT, NEW ORLEANS SAINTS
Davenport is in the final year of his rookie contract, and the Saints' season has not gone as anticipated. The former first-round pick has recorded 20 total pressures and 15 quarterback hurries on the year, earning a solid 78.2 PFF grade.

With Davenport bound to become a free agent in March, New Orleans might just look to get something done now before he potentially leaves for nothing. It’s worth mentioning the Saints are without a first-round pick next year and their salary cap situation is not in the healthiest of spots.

EDGE BRADLEY CHUBB, DENVER BRONCOS
Similar to Davenport, Chubb is also in the final year of his rookie contract and the Broncos' season has been an abstract disaster. Chubb could be this year’s Von Miller for teams looking to add immediate pass-rush help on a rental contract. The former top-five pick has an 82.9 pass-rush grade this season, the best mark of his career. The Rams, who traded for Miller last year, would make a lot of sense.

WR JERRY JEUDY & K.J. HAMLER, DENVER BRONCOS
The Broncos extended two receivers at the end of last season, giving big-money deals to Courtland Sutton and Tim Patrick. Both Hamler and Jeudy have one year remaining on their rookie contracts, though Jeudy has a team option, as well. Denver has received calls inquiring about both. Keep in mind the Broncos don’t have a first- or second-round pick in 2023. A loss to the Jacksonville Jaguars in Week 8 would make the chatter only louder.

CB WILLIAM JACKSON III, WASHINGTON COMMANDERS
Jackson recently requested a trade, just one year after signing a three-year, $42 million free agent deal. He’s earned a career-low 49.6 PFF grade so far this season after posting a 59.3 grade last year. Jackson has been out due to a back injury, but it’s fair to wonder if the Commanders are just holding him out as they continue to look for a reasonable deal.

WR MARQUEZ CALLAWAY, NEW ORLEANS SAINTS
Callaway put together the best season of his NFL career last year with 46 catches for 698 yards and six touchdowns, earning a career-best 69.3 PFF grade. He took a bit of a backseat entering this season amid a crowded position room including Michael Thomas, Chris Olave and Jarvis Landry. Those guys have been banged up, but none of the injuries are believed to be long-term. Add in the emergence of undrafted free agent Rashid Shaheed, and Callaway’s name becomes an intriguing option. He’s set to be a restricted free agent after this season.

LB SHAQ THOMPSON, CAROLINA PANTHERS
The Panthers are not interested in trading core players such as D.J. Moore, Brian Burns, Jaycee Horn and Derrick Brown. Carolina believes that group consists of building blocks that will help jumpstart their future with a new head coach. They are open to adding more draft capital by shipping off some older veteran players like Shaq Thompson, who is the last player remaining from the team’s Super Bowl 50 lineup. He’s graded out as a top-10 linebacker against the run this year (82.8 grade).

Other names to keep an eye on:
WR Denzel Mims, New York Jets
WR Kenny Golladay, New York Giants
DI Matt Ioannidis, Carolina Panthers
Edge Clelin Ferrell, Las Vegas Raiders
CB Sidney Jones, Seattle Seahawks
Edge Tarell Basham, Dallas Cowboys
OT Isaiah Wynn, New England Patriots

Among the teams to keep a close eye on:
Philadelphia Eagles
Los Angeles Rams
Green Bay Packers
Kansas City Chiefs
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Tennessee Titans


https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-players-to-watch-2022-trade-deadline
There are a lot of intriguing names on that list. Of course, NFL trades are not even close to being as frequent as trades in the NBA and MLB. I have my eyes on the three Denver players. Any of the three could help us a lot in the future. Denver is a hot mess right now. They gave up the farm and their future for an older Russel Wilson, who is already alienating his teammates. Their HC is probably going to be fired after just one year at the helm. They could be big-time sellers.
And Denver is stuck with Wilson until about 2026 due to the contract. I'm not too big on Bradley Chubb, great rookie season and that was about it, and he's been out more than he's been in.

Code
Regular season	Tackles	Interceptions	Fumbles
Year	Team	GP	GS	Comb	Total	Ast	Sck	TFL	QBHits	PDef	Int	Yds	Avg	Lng	TD	FF	FR
2018	DEN	16	16	60	41	19	12.0	14	21	1	0	0	0.0	0	0	2	1
2019	DEN	4	4	21	16	5	1.0	5	6	1	0	0	0.0	0	0	1	0
2020	DEN	14	14	42	26	16	7.5	9	19	0	0	0	0.0	0	0	1	0
2021	DEN	7	7	21	9	12	0.0	1	4	2	1	21	21.0	21	0	0	0
Career	41	41	144	92	52	20.5	29	50	4	1	21	21.0	21	0	4	1

Chubb is a pretty good player, but yeah, he probably would not be on our radar. He will almost certainly will want a big contract next year, so he is probably just a one-year rental for a team vying for 'Chip. Much like Von Miller last year. Nice to dream, though.
This guy was mentioned in the article. Denver is almost certainly a "seller." I think he would make sense for the Browns. Probably a lot of other teams, too. But, one can hope.

Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Quote
Pit...yea, we were pretty much saying the same thing...but let's not act as if Woods didn't have a say into what players he preferred.

IMO, it was obvious that Woods wanted small quick DTs vs run stopping, 330 pound DTs, who could bench 225 33 times. Like I said, let's not act like Woods didn't take the Browns DC job without telling the Browns what he needed to make his defense work.

This is an opinion, but there is absolutely no evidence to give credence to that opinion. As I have tried to show you, the 4-2-5 wants a big, heavy guy in the middle. It's sad that you and a handful of others have reached the point where you are willing to make things up in order to build up the momentum to have men get fired. These men have families and have worked their entire lives to get to this point. Presenting facts is one thing. Fabricating things like you and the other fans of an ex-player do is quite another. It's shameful.


Quote
VERS WRITES: "As I have tried to show you, the 4-2-5 wants a big, heavy guy in the middle."


Pit, Willie and Steve...VERS is actually agreeing with us, to run Woods 4-2-5, you want those 330# DTs who can bench 225/33 times (for example).

While everyone agrees on the need for Big Eaters playing DT when playing in Woods 4-2-5 defense...HOW DARE WE QUESTION how the Browns actually ended up with UNDERSIZED DTs that weigh 301, 290, 291 & 290..?

Woods and Berry have had 3 seasons to build a defense that now ranks 24th in the NFL at stopping the run.

HOW DOES THIS HAPPEN..?
mac, I have been saying we need a bigger DT or even DT long before the season even started.

I wasn't questioning you on that. I am questioning that you think Woods has a voice in picking the players and that he told Berry that he wants smaller DTs. There is absolutely no evidence of those conversations taking place. Furthermore, given what the 4-2-5 needs from its interior line, I find it next to impossible that Woods wants smaller dudes in the middle.

We don't have to agree on the coaching staff, but at least play fair.
Actually, it has been stated numerous times by our front office that all of these sorts of decisions are collaborative in nature. Now, true, that does not specifically mean that they want smaller DT's, but if we have nothing but smaller DT's and it is a collaborative effort, then the extrapolation isn't too difficult.
Never let facts get in the way of a good football take. Especially while accusing others of fabrication
j/c:

I won't argue about it. Posters can decide for themselves about whether or not Woods wants small DTs who are not good at clogging the middle and eating up blocks to compensate the fact that much of the rest of the defense consists of smaller, faster guys in the 4-2-5. I posted an article about it earlier that was meant to be educational after Homes asked me a question. Posters can google "defensive tackles in 4-2-5" and read tons of articles about the subject and decide for yourselves whether or not you believe Woods wants smaller DTs.
Back to the possible trades theme of the thread.

The Giants traded former first round pick Kadarius Toney to the Chiefs for a conditional 3rd and a 6th round pick. Dude was very good for awhile, but hasn't been playing or practicing. Must have been problems between him and the team due to reasons beyond his ability. He could be huge for KC.
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Back to the possible trades theme of the thread.

The Giants traded former first round pick Kadarius Toney to the Chiefs for a conditional 3rd and a 6th round pick. Dude was very good for awhile, but hasn't been playing or practicing. Must have been problems between him and the team due to reasons beyond his ability. He could be huge for KC.


Yes it feels like most of the posts should have been moved to the Joe Woods thread

I almost asked the refs a day or two back to move my comments to that thread

as far as Hunt and Greedy, I'm thinking nothing will happen until after the Monday night game
I could be dead wrong, but I kinda doubt Greedy gets traded. Doesn't seem we would get adequate value. You can't have too many corners. Also, Ward's concussion issues are scaring me.
If nothing else, Ward's concussions issues are reason #1 we should NOT be looking to trade Greedy, even if that rookie and others are stepping up and looking Ok. We're deep back there, but we're not so deep that we can toss guys away while others are injured.
It seems more and more to me that although our FO hasn't given up on this season, at least they won't admit it, moves that we might make at the trade deadline will be done with an eye towards next season. If we lose Monday night, I think everyone will come to the realization that this season is toast. Might as well acquire the most talent we can and or draft picks for '23. IMO if Ward keeps getting these concussions, he may just decide to call it quits. They're nothing to be fooling around with and I wouldn't want to see him permanently injured.
Mac, Elliott was asked to gain weight this off-season. He came in at nearly 330 pounds. The other guys are on the lighter side.
so far a lot of smoke... not much movement... still a few days left.....
The Bills need to get Hunt, do what ya gotta do
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
If nothing else, Ward's concussions issues are reason #1 we should NOT be looking to trade Greedy, even if that rookie and others are stepping up and looking Ok. We're deep back there, but we're not so deep that we can toss guys away while others are injured.

Agreed. If Greedy is actually on the trading the block, then my guess is that the FO thinks they can replace his production easily. Just because a guy is not going to be here next year (which I expect Greedy to not be) doesn't mean you dump him and create a hole on the roster. Maybe the FO doesn't think he would leave much of a hole if he were to be gone?

I did not see the BAL game and only saw the 1st half against NE. What I saw from Greedy was what I saw a lot of him last year. Leaving a big cushion. On 3rd and 6 he lines up 12 yards off the receiver. Easy 1st down after easy 1st down. That said, I'd rather we kept him for the rest of the year. Doubtful we found someone better to finish the season.
or, perhaps with as bad of a start as we've had, it doesn't make a difference at all whether or not we trade Greedy while risking being without Ward.
I mean, after all, what's gonna happen... we blow some coverages??
j/c:

After some early struggles, the Browns pass defense has improved. It's not great, but they rank 14th overall out of the 32 teams.

I also don't think Greedy is as bad as many think he is. I'd keep him.
He isn't terrible by any means, he just hasn't been as good as hoped and he's had availability issues.

The pass defense has been putrid, and it is a sample size of one as far as them "improving". Perhaps not coincidentally, it is also the number of games Ward has missed lately and it has been his name on a lot of the blown plays.
How they're only as low as 14 is mildly amazing.
j/c:

Quote
5 realistic Browns trade targets with Tuesday's deadline approaching
Share this article
453 shares
share tweet email

Cory Kinnan
October 27, 2022 4:25 pm ET

The Cleveland Browns are more than likely going to be sellers as this year’s trade deadline approaches. However, they will never bat an eye at an opportunity to acquire young talent in need of a change of scenery either.

While it was draft day, general manager Andrew Berry made a move to go up and get Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah. This Spring he sent shockwaves through the league, acquiring wide receiver Amari Cooper for just a fifth round pick. This also does not include the massive trade he made this past Spring to upgrade at quarterback as well.



Berry has also been known to make low-risk trades as well. Swapping linebacker Mack Wilson for pass rusher Chase Winovich was a non-consequential move made, as was acquiring linebacker Deion Jones for a pick swap.

As the deadline approaches, the Browns will have the opportunity to both make non-consequential trades and acquire young talent. Here are five realistic trades the Browns could make to add talent to their roster.


One massive point to hammer home when discussing prospective trades is that Berry will not go after expiring contracts. Double paying (trading assets just to turn around and pay the player) is not in the wheelhouse of this analytically-minded front office.

The only time Berry has done this was with the recent trade for Jones, where he swapped a sixth rounder for Jones and a seventh, then terminated the last year of the deal to make him a free agent. This philosophy is going to exclude players like defensive tackle Da’Ron Payne and tight end Mike Gesicki from the conversation of trade targets from the Browns.

Berry targets players that were paid during a previous market and now look underpaid (Cooper) or young players with years left on their rookie deals (safety Ronnie Harrison is a prime example here). With these parameters set, here are the five players who fit the mold should the Browns go shopping before Tuesday’s trade deadline.


DT Milton Williams, Philadelphia Eagles


Expect the Philadelphia Eagles to call on running back Kareem Hunt. Howie Roseman and Berry have a great relationship, and the Eagles are amid a Super Bowl run. Miles Sanders has been great this season, and adding another change of pace in Hunt could push their offense to a new level.

If they do call on Hunt, there are two defensive tackles worth checking in on. Javon Hargrave is also on an expiring contract like Hunt, so the Browns could swap rental for rental. However, given that the Browns are more than likely looking toward 2023, a young player still under contract makes more sense.

Enter Milton Williams.

Drafted in the third round last year, the athletic specimen has not quite found his footing yet. Yes, Hargrave is set to be a free agent at the end of the season, but they still have Fletcher Cox and Jordan Davis to start inside. Additionally, Marlon Tuipulotu has been getting almost an equal amount of snaps as Williams.

Given the deficiencies in the defensive tackle room, adding a young one who still has two years beyond 2022 on his contract is not a bad idea for the Browns to pursue.


WR K.J. Hamler, Denver Broncos


Speaking with individuals plugged in around the Broncos, I get the sense that K.J. Hamler is a more likely target to be traded than Jerry Jeudy of the Denver wide receivers. The Browns have found success just triangulating Cooper, tight end David Njoku, and Donovan Peoples-Jones, but they are still missing a key piece: a horizontal extension of the run game.

Yes, Hamler is a threat to take the top off of the defense, but he is slippery and elusive with the football in his hands as well. Currently, the screen game of the Browns revolves almost completely around their backs, with the occasional look to Njoku as well. Getting a guy who can handle end-arounds and screens the way they thought 2021 third round pick Anthony Schwartz would be able to could take an already top-10 offense to another new height.

Hamler is still under contract for another year beyond this season as well after being selected in the second round of the 2020 NFL Draft. And a bonus to adding Hamler? He has an extensive history of returning punts during his time at Penn State.


S Xavier Woods, Carolina Panthers


The Carolina Panthers have already proven capable of offloading talented players for draft picks. Just last week they received a haul from the San Francisco 49ers in exchange for running back Christian McCaffrey. As they continue to tear it down and rebuild after the tumultuous Matt Rhule era, they could continue to ship off talented players for draft picks.

As the Browns look for answers in their safety room, they could look at other rosters, and the Panthers have a talented one in Xavier Woods. Just 27 years old, Woods signed a contract with the Panthers this offseason and is under contract until 2024. Trading Woods would also only cost the Panthers $1.6 million in dead cap.

John Johnson III has been bad, Grant Delpit has been worse, and Ronnie Harrison is set to be a free agent after the season (and is also bad). This is not just about the 2022 season in the safety room, but a veteran presense who has been a positive force this season is what the Browns need both on and off the field.


DE Al-Quadin Muhammad, Chicago Bears


The Chicago Bears already shipped off one pass rusher, why not another? The Browns could find themselves interested in Al-Quadin Muhammad, should the Bears also continue to look for draft assets to build their young team. A trade for Muhammad could be a similar move to the one with the Atlanta Falcons for Jones.

Muhammad has one year left on his contract beyond this season, but no guaranteed money. For the price of a late-round pick swap, as they did with Jones, the Browns may also be able to acquire the services of Muhammad.

Given that they will only have three defensive ends under contract beyond 2022, having a veteran as the fourth could take pressure off of Isaiah Thomas, who would be thrust into a massive role otherwise. Muhammad has not quite graded out well in 2022 but found a productive role previously when with the Indianapolis Colts.


TE Tommy Tremble, Carolina Panthers


And we are back to the Panthers.

They paid Ian Thomas this offseason, and have two others Stephen Sullivan and Giovanni Ricci still on the roster. For a team that is tearing it down to the foundation, how important is Tommy Tremble to the Panthers?

With the injury to Njoku, even if it is only for one game, the Browns could look for a tight end on the trade market. Pharaoh Brown also finds himself in the concussion protocol, leaving Harrison Bryant as the only healthy tight end on the roster.

And Bryant has not been a particularly bright spot for the Browns this year either with one season left on his deal beyond 2022. Tremble is athletic, a good pass catcher going back to his days at Notre Dame, and a lethal blocker. The Browns still run a great deal of 12 personnel with some 13 mixed in as well.

Having depth at the tight end position when there currently is not is a bad thing. Entering the 2023 season as well, do not be shocked to see a new face in the room regardless.


https://brownswire.usatoday.com/lis...medium=trueanthem&utm_source=twitter
Pretty easy to improve your pass defense ranking when the other teams are not passing so much as they run it for over 200-yards down your throat. I get the building on a positive, but this is really just a false narrative wouldn't you think?
Originally Posted by steve0255
Pretty easy to improve your pass defense ranking when the other teams are not passing so much as they run it for over 200-yards down your throat. I get the building on a positive, but this is really just a false narrative wouldn't you think?
How dare you question the "poster" of all time?
It'll be interesting to see how many snap Hunt gets on Monday night, I wouldn't be suprised if he is a healthy scratch, which would tell you a trade is imminent
Originally Posted by boofers20
It'll be interesting to see how many snap Hunt gets on Monday night, I wouldn't be suprised if he is a healthy scratch, which would tell you a trade is imminent

That is why I won't play him in my fantasy leagues. I don't want to get to Monday night and find we aren't playing him or he has just been traded.

On a sidenote, him being traded would be good from that standpoint. He should get more work if he is traded, and so would Chubb, who I also have. It will also vindicate my keeping DJ on my roster as I have been expecting a trade of Hunt. Now DJ should get some work.

Worst that happens is no trade happens, and that really isn't all that bad, I still have Hunt on my real team for at least another 10 games.
I really hate all the Hunt trade talks. I'd rather keep Chubb and Hunt together. But then again Stefanski doesn't seem to be utilizing them both to their fullest potential.
I'd take a 2024 4th round pick for Hunt.

Also, the Eagles are going to really good for some time with all those picks. Sheesh.
(edit: not directed at any one in particular but)
Time to stop spinning the truth of the outcomez of the decizionz of this thumbsdown franchise.

sTOP sPINNING REALITY to excuse the inepitute of this liarville franchise.

If the Browns trade Kareem Hunt, mid year...It would e@ual =====the Browns would become as useless as the Detroit lions.

Force Haslam to sell the team.

(He can't stand up to peer pressure from the other owners anyway, and doing ^ that^ would be more proof of it. ) ( The same was cutting Baker.)
I'd give up a 2024, or 2023 for that matter, 4th round pick to only just to keep Kareem Hunt on the team for the remainder of THIs year.

no more next years only This year matters.

If the Browns can't keep their team together they are a
If the Browns continue to trade Known good things
for known bad things, then maybe it is time to stop broadcasting the Browns
on television and other media.
Originally Posted by OldColdDawg
Wow, sounds like this FO is throwing in the towel this season. Quiters.
They tried to tell you that Jacoby INCONCEIVABLE Brissett is a viable option at @uarterback.

so OF COURsE they threw in the Towell, only @uestion is WHEN.

relevant as the detroit lions.
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by boofers20
It'll be interesting to see how many snaps Hunt gets on Monday night, I wouldn't be suprised if he is a healthy scratch, which would tell you a trade is imminent

That is why I won't play him in my fantasy leagues. I don't want to get to Monday night and find we aren't playing him or he has just been traded.

On a sidenote, him being traded would be good from that standpoint. He should get more work if he is traded, and so would Chubb, who I also have. It will also vindicate my keeping DJ on my roster as I have been expecting a trade of Hunt. Now DJ should get some work.

Worst that happens is no trade happens, and that really isn't all that bad, I still have Hunt on my real team for at least another 10 games.
Apparantly your fantasy league(s) and the players individual best/self interests are more important to you than the Browns teams' success.
I would trade Greedy and I would trade Denzel Ward as well.

I am torn on trading Hunt. I like him but not the way we use him. I would use him like the 49ers used Deebo Samual last season. I would have Chubb and Hunt on the field at the same time. And I would sign him to a 2-3 year extension. But the way we use him? Trade him.
The secondary benefited from a good pass rush tonight, for sure, but I wouldn’t trade Greedy. The DBs were solid tonight.
j/c...

Trading hunt will never get value, He won't be unreasonable in his demands for a new contract and we are better with him than without, Johnson is alright but he is no Hunt. Losing Hunt means losing part of our identity. I'd keep him and work on an extension before free agency. he wants to be here and he's the kind of guy you keep around. Trading Greedy is a nothing burger, trading Conklin would be dumb too.
Originally Posted by leadtheway
Trading hunt will never get value, He won't be unreasonable in his demands for a new contract and we are better with him than without, Johnson is alright but he is no Hunt. Losing Hunt means losing part of our identity. I'd keep him and work on an extension before free agency. he wants to be here and he's the kind of guy you keep around. Trading Greedy is a nothing burger, trading Conklin would be dumb too.

I would think that if we trade Hunt we would have explored extending him.

If it hasn't already happened, it probably isn't.
I’m thinking last night probably made us a little more hesitant to trade him
I think last night was used to better showcase him before the deadline today. Hunt will certainly explore the FA market next year. And at this point I think there are a coupe of questions everyone needs to ask themselves.....

With having watson, who everyone pretty much agrees is a premiere QB, would the Browns consider it wise to match or exceed the FA value of Hunt as a secondary RB when they have Johnson waiting in the wings? As of now the Browns must depend on the RB's to help open up the passing game. That certainly won't be the case when they have a QB who gives them the ability to also use the passing game to open up the running game. Would you really pay 8 million per year for a back up RB under such conditions? As of now Hunt's contract has been paying him 6 million per year. For a RB needy team he will be worth more to them than to the Browns. I don't see the Browns paying that kind of money for a second string RB after signing watson.
The one caveat to it: Hunt is Chubb’s boy. Chubb is our MVP. If Michael Jordan wants Steve Kerr, you re-sign Steve Kerr.
I say keep them both. We're a better team with Hunt and Greedy: yes, a healthy Greedy. He played well last night. If he stays healthy I think he may even get better. JMO
Originally Posted by Dawgs4Life
The one caveat to it: Hunt is Chubb’s boy. Chubb is our MVP. If Michael Jordan wants Steve Kerr, you re-sign Steve Kerr.

I agree with this.
I kinda doubt we trade Hunt now. I think we would have moved him if we got our asking price, but they wouldn't take less than what they thought he was worth. He'll probably sign somewhere else next year and it would have been nice to get some value in return for him, but he's too damn good to just give away for a lower round pick. I have no idea what the Browns wanted in return. I'm guessing a 4th or better. But, that's just a guess.
The part I didn't like was why trade Hunt now. If you wouldn't do it before the season, it seems like it's punting on the current season, which the organization shouldn't be doing. Just weird timing unless he's being a malcontent behind the scenes.
I don't think it's confusing at all and has nothing to do with "punting on the current season". We have seen it mentioned season after season several times on this board and why people suddenly find it some kind of mystery is baffling at best. At the beginning of the season most teams are healthy and set at most positions. The demand for a player at any given position when teams are healthy at their respective positions isn't in high demand. Also they may think they have the position filled adequately only to find out they don't.

So through attrition, the more injuries teams sustain and the more they figure out they need help at the RB position the more demand there is in the market. This has always been the case.
I was opposed to trading him before the season. RBs take more punishment than any other position. Imagine if Chubb got hurt during camp or in the first game or two. I get that we have DEJ and the rookie, but Hunt and Chubb are the best duo in the league. Not having either of them would suck. But, that's just my opinion.
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
I kinda doubt we trade Hunt now. I think we would have moved him if we got our asking price, but they wouldn't take less than what they thought he was worth. He'll probably sign somewhere else next year and it would have been nice to get some value in return for him, but he's too damn good to just give away for a lower round pick. I have no idea what the Browns wanted in return. I'm guessing a 4th or better. But, that's just a guess.

Just to play on the words, is it better to give him away for nothing?

I understand it may not be "giving" him away, but if you don't have him on the team it's pretty much the same thing. No?
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
I don't think it's confusing at all and has nothing to do with "punting on the current season". We have seen it mentioned season after season several times on this board and why people suddenly find it some kind of mystery is baffling at best. At the beginning of the season most teams are healthy and set at most positions. The demand for a player at any given position when teams are healthy at their respective positions isn't in high demand. Also they may think they have the position filled adequately only to find out they don't.

So through attrition, the more injuries teams sustain and the more they figure out they need help at the RB position the more demand there is in the market. This has always been the case.

And add to that the upside of certain teams seeing a window and deciding that a certain player will help them climb through before it closes. That's where we usually see the largest upside of ROI and that also usually takes place during the season.

The comp pick formula is not only "secret" but very hard to decode. Cfrs15 was pretty knowledgeable with all of this stuff, but he's been mia since the Jets debacle. The NFL says it's based on salary, playing time, and postseason honors, whatever-the-heck that means. I suspect we'll see more of Hunt down the stretch so that he reaches all roster bonuses and time on the field. But what will that amount to? Probably a 4th round pick in 2024. Not really the return we're looking for. Even if it's a 3rd, it's the latest of 3rds and takes a full year to become an actual asset.

I don't know all the ins and outs of NFL player negotiations, but I suspect we will continue to work on an extension with Hunt. I also suspect we will fail. I've said it many times (although posters usually confused the statement with me advocating for a trade)... he is and has been our most valuable trade chip. This is true because he has a much greater value to other teams without a RB named Chubb on their roster.

Unfortunately, at this late hour, the chip turns more to a thorn in our side every week. Every week he is closer to being a free agent signing with a team that will likely pay way more for the upside he brings to their org.
We still have him for the rest of the year. He can help us win games. I'm not declaring we go on a run, but it's not out of the question. I think this team is nowhere near as bad as some are saying they are. Just my opinion.
j/c...

Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
We still have him for the rest of the year. He can help us win games. I'm not declaring we go on a run, but it's not out of the question. I think this team is nowhere near as bad as some are saying they are. Just my opinion.

It's semantics, really. In the end, you're as bad as your record says you are; that's just the reality of it. Everything else is just potential, and all the unrealized potential in the world and 25 cents might get you a cup of coffee.

They just have to follow up the Cinci game with more performances like it. They need to stop talking about it and actually start doing it.
Originally Posted by Milk Man
j/c...


Nobody willing to give up a measly 4th rounder for Hunt. Wow. Good. I am glad he is here!
I'm glad he is staying. Many act as if it was the team wanting to move him, I disagree. I think he wants to be the guy, and knows that won't happen here. He is getting older, and a big payday will be hard for him to aquire as basically RB2. His best bet is to ball out for the rest of the season, and hit free agency next year. I think he will get a good contract somewhere. He will never get the Huge payday, he blew that when he had his incident. I kind of feel bad for him, but your reap what you sow.
If no team is willing to give up a 4th rounder, I highly doubt he’ll be a top targeted FA. I actually think he might stick around now for another 2-3 year deal for maybe $12-14 million
Originally Posted by Steubenvillian
He will never get the Huge payday, he blew that when he had his incident. I kind of feel bad for him, but your reap what you sow.

That only applies to some.
Originally Posted by Dawgs4Life
If no team is willing to give up a 4th rounder, I highly doubt he’ll be a top targeted FA. I actually think he might stick around now for another 2-3 year deal for maybe $12-14 million

That is always a possibility.

Hunt kind of screwed us on the trade front with his semi holdout early in camp over dissatisfaction with his pay. It may have scared teams away from giving up any kind of pick. Teams might give up a 6th rounder to more or less get a jump on free agency but a 4th is pretty steep for a guy you might not be able to sign. If you do that, you just put the player and his agent in control of the table.
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Originally Posted by Steubenvillian
He will never get the Huge payday, he blew that when he had his incident. I kind of feel bad for him, but your reap what you sow.

That only applies to some.

True. Runningbacks are pretty easy to find. Some may not be as good, but many are good enough.

Everybody wants chunks, but most teams are pretty happy with a guy who can find the hole and give a team 4-5 yards a carry. That is pretty much what running plays are designed to gain. Anything over that is a bonus.
Chubb did not hold out. He held in. It became a thing for some guys this year. Roquan Smith did it in Chicago and he was just traded to Baltimore the other day. I think Hunt's position is what worked against him. Teams don't typically give up much for RBs.
Miami is obviously all in with Tua
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by Dawgs4Life
If no team is willing to give up a 4th rounder, I highly doubt he’ll be a top targeted FA. I actually think he might stick around now for another 2-3 year deal for maybe $12-14 million

That is always a possibility.

Hunt kind of screwed us on the trade front with his semi holdout early in camp over dissatisfaction with his pay. It may have scared teams away from giving up any kind of pick. Teams might give up a 6th rounder to more or less get a jump on free agency but a 4th is pretty steep for a guy you might not be able to sign. If you do that, you just put the player and his agent in control of the table.

The guy was given a chance to revive his career in Cleveland when it looked like it was as good as over. He's also making $6.25 million this year, let's see him try living off my wages. He's getting paid his market value in my opinion. He's free to test the market after this season if he wants, but I doubt he can get much better out there. Splitting reps with Chubb is also allowing him to extend his career longer than if he was the only back.
Agreed. He’s in a good spot here. Nobody is going to give him more IMO
And if you could do what Hunt does you could try living on his salary.
That is some amazing stuff, right there.
That blitz busted the play's design. All those yards were gained courtesy of Kareeeeeem.

My...
Look what people can do.

I'm a huge Kareem fan. I love how he plays the game, and I love the energy he he brings when he gets the ball. He's still a threat to take any play to the house if he gets in space, and he's a great compliment/contrast to 24's style. Dude's a Tasmanian Devil, and I love it. He plays with passion, and by instinct. Sometimes, he'll get the yardage the called play was designed to get, and turn it into another 3-4 yards, just on sheer force of will. It makes every play of his force you to hold your breath... cuz you never know what might happen.

Like I said in the thread where SB gif'd Chubb stiff-arming that hapless PIT player, you want people like this on your team.
You want as many people like this on your team as you can get. That's the core of what football is.

The Nick Chubb/Kareem Hunt tandem (behind this Callahan O Line) is the thing that makes the Browns unique in all the 2022 NFL. 24/27 make this O run.

Monday night's game was the perfect example of how this team was built to win games: get the lead, pound & confound. Give your backup QB every advantage with play action, because your backs are such a threat. Take the smart throws/move sticks, take the occasional deep shot when the situation dictates.

Then make them choke on some Chubb/running game in the 4th.


All year long, this formula has been waiting for one thing: a D that can help them get/maintain that lead.
I believe that Mon night's game was an example of how this team was supposed to win games this year.

I'm glad 27 is still here.
I wish we could see a play package that features him. He does so many things so well.


.02
[quote=Clemdawg]
I'm glad 27 is still here.
I wish we could see a play package that features him. He does so many things so well.
[quote]

And you've got a fully capable and deserving player sitting on the pines by the name of D'Ernest Johnson who could be a starter on more than a few other teams. I don't know if there are enough plays to keep them all 'happy'....
LOL........you're right. Tasmanian Devil is a perfect way to describe how he runs.


I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone run more violently than Hunt. Every run seems like it badly hurts haha
Lol, true. Kareem mans up. I’m glad we kept him, never wanted to trade him
I actually think he’ll be here next year now too
Originally Posted by Dawgs4Life
I actually think he’ll be here next year now too

I highly doubt it. They'll likely extend an offer, but it'll probably be low. Browns have to watch their cap next year, so I expect the Browns to really trust what they have in Ford, and pick up another RB in the 23' draft and hope they luck up.
I think you're putting too much faith in Ford. Johnson is the proven producer currently on the roster at RB.
I liked what i saw from Ford too, but I wouldn’t bank on him to replace Hunt
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
I think you're putting too much faith in Ford. Johnson is the proven producer currently on the roster at RB.

Are we? Seriously now, do we Fans really know what Ford can do? I have questions, so I am not speaking with confidence.

As fans, we must get better at evaluating. I say we get too emotionally attached or a better word comfortable with what we think is excellence.

"Analytics," oh, what a great excuse for what works and what does not. In the end, it is simply a benchmark. Just like humans, it can predict perfection but with a percentage of error!

Pit, I don't wish to question your opinion. I too have doubts, but are we questioning what we don't know?
This is interesting...

With the way things played out at the trade deadline I think we'll try to re-sign Hunt in the off season and let Johnson go, if we fail to re-sign Hunt than we'll work at bringing Johnson back.
Originally Posted by dawg66
With the way things played out at the trade deadline I think we'll try to re-sign Hunt in the off season and let Johnson go, if we fail to re-sign Hunt than we'll work at bringing Johnson back.

Probably. But my guess is that Hunt won't take what we offer (one last shot as the featured back on another team, etc). At any rate, the time to move Johnson was last offseason. I think his stock was highest then. We'll roll with Ford as Chubb's back-up next year, imo.

I don't know.
Originally Posted by bugs
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
I think you're putting too much faith in Ford. Johnson is the proven producer currently on the roster at RB.

Are we? Seriously now, do we Fans really know what Ford can do? I have questions, so I am not speaking with confidence.

As fans, we must get better at evaluating. I say we get too emotionally attached or a better word comfortable with what we think is excellence.

"Analytics," oh, what a great excuse for what works and what does not. In the end, it is simply a benchmark. Just like humans, it can predict perfection but with a percentage of error!

Pit, I don't wish to question your opinion. I too have doubts, but are we questioning what we don't know?

To an extent I suppose. But there is sound reasoning to question it. First, most everything we have to evaluate Ford on is against second and third string NFL talent in preseason. He wasn't facing NFL starters. It's rather hard to gauge his actual production based upon that alone. Secondly you in your own words admit we are questioning what we do not know.

That's not what we're doing with Johnson. If you read the quote of my words you will see exactly what I'm saying. I did not say that Ford couldn't do the job. I said I think the poster was putting too much faith in Ford. Simply because you can not depend on what a RB did against second and third string talent. That's far different than playing against NFL starters. In the second sentence it's 100% correct that Johnson has already proven he is not only a good producer against first string NFL talent but an excellent producer.

I guess one could suppose that an unproven RB who has played against backup talent might be as good as Johnson who has already proven he can produce at a high level against a higher quality of talent if they so choose to. But I haven't seen any actual evidence to suggest that would be correct. My opinion is based on the actual evidence at hand. That isn't analytics.

Far too often I've seen fans depend on what they saw in preseason when people they thought were really good players have to step up and face better NFL talent. Often times they get disappointed. Far more times than not actually. So is it possible Ford could repeat his production in preseason against inferior talent against better talent? Yes, anything is possible. There's just no evidence to support it and Johnson did REALLY well when called upon in that situation.
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
This is interesting...


Moving the trade deadline back is an excellent idea.
Originally Posted by dawg66
With the way things played out at the trade deadline I think we'll try to re-sign Hunt in the off season and let Johnson go, if we fail to re-sign Hunt than we'll work at bringing Johnson back.

I think there is next to a zero percent change Hunt is back next year. Doubt the Browns even make an offer. I am sure Hunt's agent knows where the Browns stand as far as money goes at this point. He's not in the Browns plans with the draft of Ford and more importantly, Hunt will get starter money on the open market. Not high end starter money, but starter money nonetheless.

Also, with Watson as the starting QB, the need to invest as heavily, financially, in two high end RBs significantly decreases.

I'll actually be quite surprised if Johnson is brought back again unless they can continue to get him on a really cheap deal.
Originally Posted by Milk Man
Originally Posted by dawg66
With the way things played out at the trade deadline I think we'll try to re-sign Hunt in the off season and let Johnson go, if we fail to re-sign Hunt than we'll work at bringing Johnson back.

I think there is next to a zero percent change Hunt is back next year. Doubt the Browns even make an offer. I am sure Hunt's agent knows where the Browns stand as far as money goes at this point. He's not in the Browns plans with the draft of Ford and more importantly, Hunt will get starter money on the open market. Not high end starter money, but starter money nonetheless.

Also, with Watson as the starting QB, the need to invest as heavily, financially, in two high end RBs significantly decreases.

I'll actually be quite surprised if Johnson is brought back again unless they can continue to get him on a really cheap deal.

While I don't see Hunt being back next year, and I would like him back, I do think the team will offer him a deal. It will be a "we like you but wish you well" kind of deal but I think they'll offer something.
© DawgTalkers.net