DawgTalkers.net
Posted By: Dave Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/08/22 09:58 PM
LA Rams vs Cincinnati Bengals, Sunday Feb 13, 6:30 PM, NBC

Talk about it here ...
Posted By: Dave Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/08/22 10:08 PM
Can't root for either of these teams. If I had to choose, I hope the Rams win 2-0, on an end zone sack by Aaron Donald.
Posted By: THROW LONG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/08/22 10:32 PM
I don't care 5 days before.
Posted By: Dave Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 01:34 AM


[Linked Image from media3.giphy.com]

Come on, man ... get a room.
Posted By: bonefish Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 01:23 PM
The Rams have to be the favorites. They have way more experience.

I will rooting for the Bengals. Kinda of a anti-odell thing.

The Bengals like us have been in the muck. So, yes I hope they win.
Posted By: PrplPplEater Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 02:42 PM
The NFL awards the Rams the SB in L.A. as part of them moving their team and building a new stadium. L.A. just *happens* to get to be playing in the very same game.


I'm rooting for the San Andreas Fault.
Posted By: FloridaFan Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 02:48 PM
Rams, since I have a futures bet on the Rams from Last February, and because Stafford deserves it after all he's had to endure, and Burrows is young enough he will have another chance. Add that I don't need Cinci fans thinking they are special tongue
Posted By: oobernoober Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 03:02 PM
Cinci "fans" are annoying, but I just can't with Odell's exit from the Browns just to get everything he wants in LA. I'm not going to go all "now everyone will do that since it worked for him", I just don't wish him success given how he acted this year.
Posted By: FATE Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 03:33 PM
Yeah, I forgot about that.

Good luck on a big payday!
Posted By: PortlandDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 03:49 PM
A never ending game, 0-0 tie until both teams concede. No winner announced. The Lombardi trophy is then melted down and forged into two swords. Both team captains publicly fall on their respective swords in an attempt to redeem their shame.
The game is erased from NFL records. There’s fines for discussing it with the press.

Life moves forward.

Bring on a healthy Browns team for 2022!!!
Posted By: PrplPplEater Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 06:10 PM
I'm sticking with rooting for the San Andreas Fault to just take the whole state during the 1st Quarter, but yours is what I'm rooting for if Plan A doesn't work out.
Posted By: The Beast Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 07:57 PM
I can't root for the Bengals but just in case they win I am betting on them. So if they lose, it's a small price to pay. If they win, the winnings will help deal with the noise from all the LIFELONG Bengals fans. LOL
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 08:13 PM
The Bengals came from the Browns so to me they and the Ravens are non-existent, because without Cleveland neither one exists ... tsktsk GO RAMS thumbsup
Posted By: Hammer Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 08:49 PM
Rams came from Cleveland, too.
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/09/22 11:36 PM
Originally Posted by Hammer
Rams came from Cleveland, too.

True but they were here before the Browns ...
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/10/22 02:42 AM
Go Bengals... honestly don't care who wins... will be happy for either team... hoping for a good game
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/10/22 06:13 AM
I think the Bengals will win it. Not really rooting for them, just think they'll beat the Rams. But if I was forced to root for a side, it would be the Bengals because OBJ is on the Rams, and can't root for him.
Posted By: THROW LONG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/10/22 02:06 PM
Projections for a Heat advisory, (Hot Summer like tempeartures) for the Super bowl on game day? What will the on field temperature be, 100 degrees? edit:
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2022/02/09/Super-Bowl-rare-heat-advisory-weather/9381644431546/
they say they can control the temperature inside the stadium.

The stadium which bills itself as a dome is part way not having outside walls, and iirc, had a game postponed by lightening in Sept or August of last year, it's opening year. (earlier this football season year).
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/11/22 01:41 AM
Hoping for a really good competitive game. I would like to see the Bengals win because they are from Ohio and so am I, but I would still be somewhat happy to see the Rams win because Matt Stafford was on a bad team for so long and it's nice to see him finally shine.

I think the Rams have the edge on this one and if they win there will be a part of me that hates seeing OBJ being part of that. Another knife in the gut of a diehard Browns fan.
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/11/22 11:57 AM
As others have said, I like that Stafford is finally able to be on a good team, and I like Cincy since they are from my teams division.

Much like SEC teams, I will mostly be for Cincy in this one. Them winning makes us better in a roundabout way. That said, if the Rams win, I won't be sad.

If I had to put $500 on it, I'd bet the Rams.
Posted By: THROW LONG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/11/22 06:26 PM
Still a day+ before the game kicks off.
As a casual observation, it seems to me the Bengals defense is built on a traditional and basic model. They might have maximized the pieces but it seems very traditional, not new aged scheme. Not a bunch of smoke and mirrors and tricks.
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/11/22 08:46 PM
BOTTOM LINE: RAMS DL VS BUNGALS OL ... I Will Take the RAMS DL thumbsup
Posted By: PrplPplEater Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/11/22 11:21 PM
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
BOTTOM LINE: RAMS DL VS BUNGALS OL ... I Will Take the RAMS DL thumbsup


This battle between DL and OL is actually determined by LB/Secondary vs TE/WR.

If they can't cover well enough long enough, and the OL can give Burrow *just* enough time, that's all it takes.
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/12/22 04:07 AM
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
As others have said, I like that Stafford is finally able to be on a good team, and I like Cincy since they are from my teams division.

Much like SEC teams, I will mostly be for Cincy in this one. Them winning makes us better in a roundabout way. That said, if the Rams win, I won't be sad.

If I had to put $500 on it, I'd bet the Rams.

on paper I think the Rams have more talent... but there's something about Burrow in the playoffs this year... wouldn't bet against him...

should be a great game
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/12/22 12:09 PM
Either way this isn't a good SB for the Browns. Either way, or maybe both ways it is going to point to our team to some degree.

It will highlight Cincy and their QB situation v ours, and or OBJ and how he looked good in LA but not here.
Posted By: PrplPplEater Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/12/22 01:39 PM
Yup... it's either going to be the team we beat twice or the team where OBJ is indisputably 2nd or 3rd best instead of being the absolute best on the team by a huge margin.


This game highlights just how close we are to being there despite missing the playoffs, despite the hugely disappointing year by Baker, and despite a defense that lost us as many games as it kept us in.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/12/22 07:00 PM
Tyler Higbee the Rams TE has been ruled out of the SB.
Posted By: mgh888 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 01:35 PM
I don't agree at all - I am rooting for the Bengals. We beat them twice with a QB who was awful for most of the year. For all the woe is me hand wringing we seem to have done as a fan base after narrowly missing out of the playoffs in the final 2 weeks of the season ... I think this super bowl shows how close we are. As for OBJ - after the way he did Cleveland wrong, I don't want him to succeed. But I am also not going to let whatever success he does or does not have this day impact me.

Could be a big day for Higgins and Boyd - my gut says the Rams will find a way to try to counter Ja'Marr CHase.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 05:03 PM
Originally Posted by mgh888
As for OBJ - after the way he did Cleveland wrong, I don't want him to succeed.

rofl
Posted By: PortlandDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 05:56 PM
I’m just kinda disgusted and part of me doesn’t want to even watch.
I boycotted the Rat’s fist SB game. I’ve never seen even a play of it. In my mind it barely existed. Part of me kinda wants to do the same this afternoon.
As it stands I’ll watch. If the Bungles get up big I’m turning it off.
I guess that makes me a Rams fan today?
Posted By: mgh888 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 05:56 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
rofl

Another quality juvenile post from you. I think 99% of fans and neutrals would agree that OBJ orchestrating his departure form the Browns makes my statement accurate. But you do you.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 06:13 PM
You sound like a jilted lover.
Posted By: JulesDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 07:01 PM
I will be rooting against the Bengals, as usual, with gusto. I would never root for them or their bandwagon, trash talking, fickle, fake fans. Go Rams!!
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 07:10 PM
We lived through it daily.
Posted By: YTownBrownsFan Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 07:16 PM
My hope is that the game is tied 9-9, late in the 4th quarter. OBJ has already fumbled twice, losing both. The Rams have the ball, with less than a minute left, They are at midfield, and Stafford hits OBJ who is wide, wide open. He takes 4 steps, and no one is within 6 feet. Sudenly, he fumbles again. The Bengals recover at their own 35.

The Bengals take over. Burrows drops back, he gets hit as he throws, the Rams intercept, and take it back for the TD to win the game.

That would be my totally non vindictive fantasy. rofl
Posted By: BADdog Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 07:22 PM
I think a rams win with no significant contribution from OBJ would do it for me.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 08:20 PM
I look at the Titans playoff game against the Bengals and it gives me pause. The Titans defense sacked Burrows nine times. The Bengals still managed to win that game by a score of 19-16. Burrows still produced well in terms of percentage and yards but didn't pass for a TD. I think the Rams defense is just a tad better. So will the Bengals be able to protect Burrows? Tannehill threw 3 int's that day and was held to 16 points. I don't see the Bengals holding the rams to 16 points. All in all it should at least be a good game. Hopefully.
Posted By: mgh888 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 08:47 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
You sound like a jilted lover.

Man your posts get more ridiculous. Hard to believe but here is the evidence. I see that you're spinning again and suggesting that because other players on other teams complain and want to be traded that suddenly that it's okay. And that teams with malcontents that try to orchestrate a departure is just par for the course and fans shouldn't feel as if the player has done wrong by the team if they engineer a release ... not a trade, where the team might get something of value back even if it's a discount ... players engineering a release from the team should be treated like no big deal. lmao.
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 09:27 PM
GO RAMS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: jfanent Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 10:40 PM
Originally Posted by JulesDawg
I will be rooting against the Bengals, as usual, with gusto. I would never root for them or their bandwagon, trash talking, fickle, fake fans. Go Rams!!

thumbsup My sentiments exactly!
Posted By: Psydeffect Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:14 PM
Originally Posted by jfanent
Originally Posted by JulesDawg
I will be rooting against the Bengals, as usual, with gusto. I would never root for them or their bandwagon, trash talking, fickle, fake fans. Go Rams!!

thumbsup My sentiments exactly!

Same here.

I keep hearing about how I should root for them because they're from Ohio. Nope, can't do it.
Posted By: DawgMichelle Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:21 PM
GO RAMS!!
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:40 PM
Tired of hearing Who Dey ... GO RAMS thumbsup
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:45 PM
STOPPED ON 4TH DOWN!!!!!!
Posted By: DeisleDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:45 PM
wow !!!
Posted By: PrplPplEater Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:47 PM
I'm still rooting for the San Andreas Fault
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:51 PM
TD Rams - OBJ
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:51 PM
TOUCHDOWN RAMS !!!!
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:52 PM
7-0 RAMS
Posted By: teedub Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:55 PM
If he put 1/3 of the effort on 4 or 5 4th down easy catches that he did on that catch the Browns season is totally different. BUM
Posted By: Milk Man Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:57 PM
Posted By: DeisleDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:57 PM
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
I'm still rooting for the San Andreas Fault


Lmao !!


I want to see Stafford get a ring !


And Kelly cheering after TD's !
Posted By: leadtheway Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:57 PM
Burrow crumbling
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:59 PM
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Tired of hearing Who Dey ... GO RAMS thumbsup

Why are you rootin' for the Rams, if I may ask?
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/13/22 11:59 PM
3 and out ... WHO DEY
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:00 AM
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Tired of hearing Who Dey ... GO RAMS thumbsup

Why are you rootin' for the Rams, if I may ask?

Not really rooting for the Rams just against the BUNGALS
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:05 AM
So far I wish I muted all these 'great' commercials.
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:07 AM
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
So far I wish I muted all these 'great' commercials.

lol yea and not looking forward to halftime show either ...
Posted By: teedub Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:07 AM
I aint snspping a QR code to watch a commercial...just saying
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:08 AM
Wow!
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:09 AM
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Tired of hearing Who Dey ... GO RAMS thumbsup

Why are you rootin' for the Rams, if I may ask?

Not really rooting for the Rams just against the BUNGALS

Why don't you like the Bengals?
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:11 AM
7-3
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:13 AM
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Tired of hearing Who Dey ... GO RAMS thumbsup

Why are you rootin' for the Rams, if I may ask?

Not really rooting for the Rams just against the BUNGALS

Why don't you like the Bengals?


Really ... 1. Rival 2. Their Fans 3. they are only here because Modell fired Paul Brown Just name a few things ...
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:17 AM
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Tired of hearing Who Dey ... GO RAMS thumbsup

Why are you rootin' for the Rams, if I may ask?

Not really rooting for the Rams just against the BUNGALS

Why don't you like the Bengals?


Really ... 1. Rival 2. Their Fans 3. they are only here because Modell fired Paul Brown Just name a few things ...

I'm rootin' for them because they are from the same state as me, but I wouldn't mind seeing the Rams win either, since their QB was on such a bad team for so long. Vindication.

I think the Rams will win.
Posted By: cfrs15 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:18 AM
Weddle is going to start missing open receivers
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:24 AM
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Tired of hearing Who Dey ... GO RAMS thumbsup

Why are you rootin' for the Rams, if I may ask?

Not really rooting for the Rams just against the BUNGALS

Why don't you like the Bengals?


Really ... 1. Rival 2. Their Fans 3. they are only here because Modell fired Paul Brown Just name a few things ...

I'm rootin' for them because they are from the same state as me, but I wouldn't mind seeing the Rams win either, since their QB was on such a bad team for so long. Vindication.

I think the Rams will win.

Me too I Root for all Ohio Teams, Browns, the Buckeyes (Football/Basketball), the Cavs (except when playing the Celtics), the Indians (except when playing the Giants), and the Reds (except when playing the Giants/Indians) I just can't root for the Bengals!!!
Posted By: JulesDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:27 AM
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Originally Posted by 3rd_and_20
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Tired of hearing Who Dey ... GO RAMS thumbsup

Why are you rootin' for the Rams, if I may ask?

Not really rooting for the Rams just against the BUNGALS

Why don't you like the Bengals?



Seriously? Lmao. The question should be why do so many Browns fans like and root for a division rival. The same people would never root for the Steelers or the Ravens.
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:27 AM
Nice run.
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:32 AM
Beautiful play/TD
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:40 AM
I suppose that injury is Baker's fault tsktsk
Posted By: teedub Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:40 AM
Awe...poor thing
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:51 AM
That non-active player got a bit too excited. lol
Posted By: Milk Man Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:53 AM
Posted By: teedub Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:59 AM
Boring game.
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:33 AM
Wow!
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:33 AM
As soon as I saw him go down I was guessing he torn his ACL...
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:34 AM
TD Bengals!
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:35 AM
Oh, that was definitely a missed facemask call.
Posted By: DeisleDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:37 AM
are you freaking serious
Posted By: 85_Browns_Queen Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:38 AM
My how the tables have turned.
Posted By: DeisleDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:40 AM
the Cincinnati incarcerated bengals
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:42 AM
How many times have we seen bad call or non-call change the momentum of a game ...
Posted By: DeisleDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:43 AM
sack the donkey !!
Posted By: Swish Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:43 AM
Donald is gonna crush Burrow if he keeps this up.
Posted By: teedub Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:47 AM
Like the non PI ramsey had on chase earlier in game?
Posted By: PastorMarc Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:49 AM
Originally Posted by teedub
Like the non PI ramsey had on chase earlier in game?

lol not even close he turned his head and threw him down ...
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:51 AM
This may be one of the best games I've seen the bengals defense play all season
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:52 AM
Dang - great play call but throw just a little high
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:53 AM
I'm glad this is a close game.
Posted By: teedub Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:55 AM
Originally Posted by PastorMarc
Originally Posted by teedub
Like the non PI ramsey had on chase earlier in game?

lol not even close he turned his head and threw him down ...

You dont consider a play that changes a TD to a FG significant?
Posted By: Milk Man Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:55 AM
j/c...

I miss the Bud Bowl.
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:56 AM
Bud bowl was awesome!
Posted By: Swish Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:58 AM
Burrow missed an easy one to chase.
Posted By: Swish Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:04 AM
bengals D line is on fire
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:06 AM
Originally Posted by Swish
bengals D line is on fire

Yea, they are doing a hell of a job.
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:07 AM
Stafford with rolled ankle... Rams offense getting beat up
Posted By: Swish Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:10 AM
bengals O line showing up in all the wrong ways.
Posted By: DeisleDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:10 AM
Sack Sack Sack
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:18 AM
Has there been any penalties this game? If so it's still pretty close to zilch.
Posted By: BADdog Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:19 AM
Yes by a non player
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:19 AM
Burrow hurt
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:21 AM
Originally Posted by BADdog
Yes by a non player

Oh yea I forgot about that.
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:51 AM
All of a sudden... lots of fouls...
Posted By: leadtheway Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:54 AM
Bengals should have let them score right after the first foul. This was inevitable. Now not enough time
.
Posted By: teedub Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:54 AM
Yep
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:54 AM
Rams up 3 with 85 second left to go...
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:55 AM
Originally Posted by leadtheway
Bengals should have let them score right after the first foul. This was inevitable. Now not enough time
.


Mahommes got his team in position to score a FG with what? 13 seconds?
Posted By: teedub Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:55 AM
Vince and rodg want OT...as if it were scripted
Posted By: leadtheway Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:58 AM
What a stupid playcall
Posted By: leadtheway Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:59 AM
Burrow with the choke
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:59 AM
Wow!

Rams gonna win
Posted By: leadtheway Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:00 AM
That draw to perrine will go down as one of the dumbest play calls of all time
Posted By: jaybird Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:01 AM
Congrats to Stafford and Darnold... excited for both of them.....

Congrats to the Bengals... hell of a run... they will be tough for the next decade...
Posted By: teedub Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:01 AM
Not as dumb as the seattle pass
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:01 AM
Good game! Congratulations LA.
Posted By: teedub Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:02 AM
Eff you al michaels...classless dig at cleveland
Posted By: Milk Man Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:04 AM
j/c...

Blue Gatorade for the win!
Posted By: BADdog Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:06 AM
What dig
Posted By: jfanent Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:07 AM
Great game. Glad the Rams won.
Posted By: JulesDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:08 AM
Yay! Sorry to all the Bengals-Browns fans on this board. Very happy!
Posted By: Milk Man Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:10 AM
McVay can retire from coaching now and head to the broadcast booth next year.
Posted By: illegalmoe Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:25 AM
Al Michael = fake news
Posted By: Squires Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 04:10 AM
That was a surprisingly good game. I was going to be mad if that PI face mask non-call ended up being the deciding factor. That missed extra point was almost a big deal.
Posted By: BADdog Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 04:59 AM
Well there was a phantom holding penalty that gave the rams a first and goal that got them their final score. I hate that crap
Posted By: illegalmoe Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 05:44 AM
Made up for the face mask non call
Posted By: THROW LONG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 05:59 AM
What happened to Joe Burrow on the 2 3rd quarter drives following the Rams field goal that brought the score to 20-16?
On those 2 failed offensive drives lies the loss imo. The Rams did very little to win the game also, imo, but they got the victory.
Posted By: CapCity Dawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 12:01 PM
Originally Posted by Squires
I was going to be mad if that PI face mask non-call ended up being the deciding factor.

Same. That might have been the most flagrant missed call in Super Bowl history.

At the end of the day, it came down to Cincy's inability to protect Burrow.
Posted By: Ballpeen Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:10 PM
Sorry the Bengals lost, but happy for Stafford.

It's too bad the refs decided to hold their flags until the final moments of the game. I think there were 2 unsportsmanlike penalties called the entire game. Then on the final drive they start tossing them for things they allowed the entire game.
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:28 PM
Nelly at the Super Bowl:

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Posted By: Swish Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:37 PM
i wonder if Missouri residents are still ticked off over the Rams relocating to LA.

i would be. wonder who Nelly wanted to win (probably bengals)
Posted By: BADdog Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 01:38 PM
Originally Posted by CapCity Dawg
Originally Posted by Squires
I was going to be mad if that PI face mask non-call ended up being the deciding factor.

Same. That might have been the most flagrant missed call in Super Bowl history.

No that would be the pass interference no call in the saints super bowl.
Posted By: Day of the Dawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:49 PM
More happy the Bengals lost than the Rams win.
Posted By: cfrs15 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:57 PM
Our 2020 offense with our 2021 defense could have easily beat either of the teams we saw in the Super Bowl.
Posted By: PortlandDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 02:59 PM
Our 2021 offense beat one of the teams twice.
Posted By: 3rd_and_20 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:01 PM
Funny headline, courtesy of the onion:

Paranoid Snoop Dogg Hides Backstage Before Halftime Show After Taking Single Puff Of Joint

https://www.theonion.com/super-bowl-paranoid-snoop-dogg-hides-backstage-1848503777
Posted By: cfrs15 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:09 PM
Originally Posted by PortlandDawg
Our 2021 offense beat one of the teams twice.

Kind of.
Posted By: mgh888 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:14 PM
Originally Posted by cfrs15
Our 2020 offense with our 2021 defense could have easily beat either of the teams we saw in the Super Bowl.

I agree 100%. It's why I said in the "how close are we thread" - we are as close as any team. Zero reason not to think we can compete in 2022.
Posted By: cfrs15 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:21 PM
Originally Posted by mgh888
Originally Posted by cfrs15
Our 2020 offense with our 2021 defense could have easily beat either of the teams we saw in the Super Bowl.

I agree 100%. It's why I said in the "how close are we thread" - we are as close as any team. Zero reason not to think we can compete in 2022.

Baker. Baker is the reason. Is he 2020 Baker or 2021 Baker?
Posted By: Dave Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 03:43 PM
I guess Bengal fans are griping today about the calls against their defense in the red zone on the Rams winning drive. I thought they were good calls; Kupp got mugged on both of those plays. Up to that point, I had been surprised at all the calls the refs didn't make, like the blatant facemask by Higgins on Ramsey that produced a Bengal TD, and also on the (legal) push out of bounds of Burrow near the sideline where I saw at least 3 Bengals take shots at Aaron Donald in the scrum after the play.
Posted By: oobernoober Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 04:55 PM
I wouldn't say Kupp got mugged. The facemask by Higgins was bad.


But let's be honest... who here wasn't waiting for the refs to suddenly start throwing flags all over the field for a drive after letting them play the rest of the game?
Posted By: mgh888 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 04:56 PM
I think the officiating in the last 5 minutes stunk.

They called a late hit on a guy for trying to knock the ball out of a receivers hands who was still in the air.

They called ticky tacky PI calls that they had let go all game.

Then there is this:

https://twitter.com/michaelFhurley/status/1493055083713544192

and

https://twitter.com/MitchSchwartz71/status/1493008579581734914?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1493008579581734914%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fbrobible.com%2Fsports%2Farticle%2Faaron-donald-offside-super-bowl-penalty%2F


I know the missed face mask was a gift on the Bengals TD. But that was early in the game and if you watch it full speed, you aren't sure what the hell happened. The end of the game was a poop-storm of bad calls. All went the way of the Rams.
Posted By: mgh888 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 04:56 PM
Posted By: THROW LONG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 05:02 PM
The Bengals bad quarterback play in the 3rd quarter lost them the game by failing to add to their total of 20 points on 2 or 3 drives.
The coach should have been more upset, maybe even should have played the backup quarterback for a drive.
Posted By: Dave Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 06:22 PM
Originally Posted by oobernoober
I wouldn't say Kupp got mugged. The facemask by Higgins was bad.


But let's be honest... who here wasn't waiting for the refs to suddenly start throwing flags all over the field for a drive after letting them play the rest of the game?

On the defensive holding at the 5 yd line, the LB had a fistful of Kupp's jersey in one hand and the other arm wrapped around Kupp. That's a mugging. Ditto on the DPI against Apple who was clearly holding Kupps jersey and inhibiting his ability to get to the ball. These weren't ticky tack calls, they were fairly obvious ones, IMO.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 07:00 PM
The Rams were moving the ball at ease and scoring when they had two legitimate WR threats on the field. Once one of them went down, they were stifled. The loss of that WR with the knee injury was devastating to their offense. The game announcers saw just how obvious it was. They saw just how much an infusion of talent on both the O and D as the season wore on paid big dividends.

In the end, when the game was on the line, the Rams D stepped up and the Rams came up with a game winning drive. The constant pressure and sacks the Rams handed Burrows were the death knell.

It was very competitive game which involved good offensive as well as defensive play. Even when the Bengals couldn't seem to stop the Rams until one of their best offensive contributors went down with a knee injury.
Posted By: oobernoober Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 07:51 PM
1st half total yards = 184
2nd half total yards = 130

Scored 3 more points in the first half than the second

1st half pass yards = 165
2nd half pass yards = 118 (didn't count the Kupp holding/PI calls, obviously)

OBJ went down with a couple minutes left in the 2nd, so I'm just using quarter stats (I don't remember if LA had the ball in the 1st half after OBJ went down).


I don't see an offense that "were moving the ball at ease", and then "they were stifled" after one dude went down. Stafford threw INTs in each half, but the 2nd half one resulted in 0 yards for that drive, vs 37 yards on the 1 in the first half. They also picked up some yards in the second half off of penalties vs completions. I know they leaned on Kupp in the late part of the game pretty hard (seemed like it anyway).
Posted By: SaintDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 08:02 PM
IMO.. IF the bungles had the Browns starting Oline, and the secondary they would have won the game.. conversely, if the Browns had the Browns starting Oline (the healthy version) and the bungles starting QB we would have won that game.
Posted By: PitDAWG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 08:22 PM
There were almost four minutes left in the first half when OBJ went down. If you couldn't see how much more trouble the Rams had moving the ball after he went down I can't help you. They scored a grand total of three points the entire game after that before the ending drive.
Posted By: DCDAWGFAN Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 10:15 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
There were almost four minutes left in the first half when OBJ went down. If you couldn't see how much more trouble the Rams had moving the ball after he went down I can't help you. They scored a grand total of three points the entire game after that before the ending drive.
Except for that one touchdown in the first half, they only scored 7 points with him.
Posted By: OldColdDawg Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 10:23 PM
Originally Posted by BADdog
Well there was a phantom holding penalty that gave the rams a first and goal that got them their final score. I hate that crap

Yep. Cinci was robbed in the final seconds. Looked like a browns finish.
Posted By: oobernoober Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 10:28 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
If you couldn't see how much more trouble the Rams had moving the ball after he went down I can't help you. They scored a grand total of three points the entire game after that before the ending drive.

I didn't see much of a difference, and I don't need your help. I laid out the total and air yardage totals for each half. There's not much of a difference (54), especially considering one of the 2nd half drives was 1 play (INT). Passing yards accounted for all but 20 of their yards in the first half, and all but 12 yards in the second.

That backs up what I saw. They were not 'stifled' after OBJ. They had to overcome a couple bad plays. Their defense did a really good job of getting them the ball back as the game went on. When they needed a score in crunch time, they went to their dude, Kupp, and got what they needed to win.
Posted By: PrplPplEater Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/14/22 11:56 PM
Originally Posted by SaintDawg
IMO.. IF the bungles had the Browns starting Oline, and the secondary they would have won the game.. conversely, if the Browns had the Browns starting Oline (the healthy version) and the bungles starting QB we would have won that game.


Raise your hand if you think Cinci finally tries to seriously fix their OLine this off-season.

A healthy Baker and two healthy OTs and we could have won that game, easy.
Posted By: Iluvmyxstripper Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/15/22 02:12 AM
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
Originally Posted by SaintDawg
IMO.. IF the bungles had the Browns starting Oline, and the secondary they would have won the game.. conversely, if the Browns had the Browns starting Oline (the healthy version) and the bungles starting QB we would have won that game.


Raise your hand if you think Cinci finally tries to seriously fix their OLine this off-season.

A healthy Baker and two healthy OTs and we could have won that game, easy.
To win that game, 1st of all the Browns would have to had to get past the Chiefs
And in 2 years the Browns have to.beat the Chiefs
Posted By: jfanent Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/15/22 12:32 PM
Just saw a clip of the last play. It sure looks like Perine half-assed it and should have caught that ball with the Super Bowl on the line. It was an amazing effort by Burrow to even get that off as he was being flung to the ground. It's at 3:49 of this clip:

Posted By: oobernoober Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/15/22 01:09 PM
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
Originally Posted by SaintDawg
IMO.. IF the bungles had the Browns starting Oline, and the secondary they would have won the game.. conversely, if the Browns had the Browns starting Oline (the healthy version) and the bungles starting QB we would have won that game.


Raise your hand if you think Cinci finally tries to seriously fix their OLine this off-season.

A healthy Baker and two healthy OTs and we could have won that game, easy.


I still don't think the Bengals have exorcised all their past demons. Mike Brown has to cheap out somewhere.
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/15/22 02:37 PM
Originally Posted by cfrs15
Originally Posted by mgh888
Originally Posted by cfrs15
Our 2020 offense with our 2021 defense could have easily beat either of the teams we saw in the Super Bowl.

I agree 100%. It's why I said in the "how close are we thread" - we are as close as any team. Zero reason not to think we can compete in 2022.

Baker. Baker is the reason. Is he 2020 Baker or 2021 Baker?

Apparently he’s good every even numbered year, so I have my hopes up again.
Posted By: dawglover05 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/15/22 02:43 PM
Brown definitely has that foil factor. We’ll see what they do with their OL. I saw somewhere that Burrow has taken way more of a beating at this point than Andrew Luck did. He also doesn’t have Luck’s build.

They need to protect what is likely their best QB in franchise history.

I think we’re also waiting to see what exactly happened to his knee toward the end of the game as well, aren’t we?
Posted By: oobernoober Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/15/22 02:50 PM
A good chunk of it is actually on him (holding the ball), but the Bengals were setting BAD records in their run this year (sacks). I think they'll look at getting to the SB as 'good enough' and pretty much roll with what they had this year.
Posted By: Iluvmyxstripper Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/15/22 04:26 PM
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
Originally Posted by SaintDawg
IMO.. IF the bungles had the Browns starting Oline, and the secondary they would have won the game.. conversely, if the Browns had the Browns starting Oline (the healthy version) and the bungles starting QB we would have won that game.


Raise your hand if you think Cinci finally tries to seriously fix their OLine this off-season.

A healthy Baker and two healthy OTs and we could have won that game, easy.


I still don't think the Bengals have exorcised all their past demons. Mike Brown has to cheap out somewhere.
My friend who lives in.Mason told me that Mike Brown
Has put alot of the decsion making in the hands of his
Daughter. He said hard to.believe but the Bengals
Had the 15th or 14th highest payroll in.The league last year
Posted By: PrplPplEater Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/15/22 05:56 PM
and they have the 4th highest amount of free cap space in 2022 ($55.8 million).

They are set to make a Super Bowl run for the next several years in a row.
Posted By: THROW LONG Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/15/22 10:04 PM
Originally Posted by PrplPplEater
Originally Posted by SaintDawg
IMO.. IF the bungles had the Browns starting Oline, and the secondary they would have won the game.. conversely, if the Browns had the Browns starting Oline (the healthy version) and the bungles starting QB we would have won that game.


Raise your hand if you think Cinci finally tries to seriously fix their OLine this off-season.

A healthy Baker and two healthy OTs and we could have won that game, easy.

I want to say I think the Bengals Offensive line was good enough going into the final game the Super bowl, to win it, Now,
as far as relying on it for a whole season, maybe it needs a tiny bit of work, but for that one game, I think their OL was not only up to the task but probably going to play well because they were so maligned all season in the public opinion.
They already, added Jackson Carmen last year and he will get healthier, but the real strength of their OL, as most could have probably seen were the additions of Spain and Prince (even if over a year had passed) and if they could have used them correctly.
The Rams won the super bowl with freaking Austin Corbett playing, not just off the bench but I think starting, so
I guess
getting the most out of lesser players is only a problem the Browns have, the Browns can never do it, but other teams always seem to know how to.
Posted By: shotty66 Re: Super Bowl 56 thread - 02/16/22 11:46 AM
the Rams were lined up os 3 times also no call
© DawgTalkers.net