Steve King: 'Would there be any population of the world left' if not for rape and incest? - 08/14/19 06:16 PM
Look, I understand the point of not demonizing past actions by our ancestors by trying to look at things from a moral lens of 2019.
But someone has yet to explain to me in what universe is defending rape and incest of the past by a sitting us Congressmen - or ANYONE for that matter - an acceptable argument to make?
I mean REALLY, conservatives?
I thought the “slaves were well fed” narrative was mind blowing.
I thought “the body shuts down when a woman gets rape so she can’t get pregnant” narrative was an abomination.
But this?
What the hell is this?
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/45742...ot-for-rape-and
Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) on Wednesday questioned whether there would be "any population of the world left" if not for rape and incest throughout history, The Des Moines Register reported.
King was speaking in Urbandale, Iowa, where he defended anti-abortion legislation he sponsored in Congress that did not have exceptions for rape or incest.
"What if we went back through all the family trees and just pulled out anyone who was a product of rape or incest? Would there be any population of the world left if we did that?" King told the crowd at the Westside Conservative Club. "Considering all the wars and all the rapes and pillages that happened throughout all these different nations, I know that I can't say that I was not a part of a product of that."
The Catholic lawmaker argued that the bad circumstances of a baby's conception does not negate their right to life.
"It's not the baby's fault for the sin of the father, or of the mother," he said.
The nine-term congressman has a history of making controversial comments.
King sparked bipartisan backlash in January for questioning during an interview with The New York Times how terms such as "white supremacist" and "white nationalist" became "offensive."
The comments were quickly denounced and House Republicans responded by removing King from his positions on the House Judiciary, Agriculture and Small Business committees.
The House also overwhelmingly passed a resolution condemning white nationalism and white supremacy by a 424-1 vote. The embattled lawmaker voted in favor of the resolution.
The lawmaker denounced white supremacist ideologies at the time and reiterated his stance on Wednesday. He also told the crowd that he supports his defense of the West, calling the United States "the flagship for Western civilization."
King claimed that political insiders told him that the controversy surrounding his comments was part of a plot to remove him from office, The Register reported.
"People think it was an organic media feeding frenzy, but no, it was orchestrated from the beginning," he said. "They had told me, heads up before Christmas, they're going to try to drive you out of office and get you to resign. Within 24 hours, you had people saying 'resign, resign, resign.' Why? Because the New York Times misquoted me?"
But someone has yet to explain to me in what universe is defending rape and incest of the past by a sitting us Congressmen - or ANYONE for that matter - an acceptable argument to make?
I mean REALLY, conservatives?
I thought the “slaves were well fed” narrative was mind blowing.
I thought “the body shuts down when a woman gets rape so she can’t get pregnant” narrative was an abomination.
But this?
What the hell is this?
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/45742...ot-for-rape-and
Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) on Wednesday questioned whether there would be "any population of the world left" if not for rape and incest throughout history, The Des Moines Register reported.
King was speaking in Urbandale, Iowa, where he defended anti-abortion legislation he sponsored in Congress that did not have exceptions for rape or incest.
"What if we went back through all the family trees and just pulled out anyone who was a product of rape or incest? Would there be any population of the world left if we did that?" King told the crowd at the Westside Conservative Club. "Considering all the wars and all the rapes and pillages that happened throughout all these different nations, I know that I can't say that I was not a part of a product of that."
The Catholic lawmaker argued that the bad circumstances of a baby's conception does not negate their right to life.
"It's not the baby's fault for the sin of the father, or of the mother," he said.
The nine-term congressman has a history of making controversial comments.
King sparked bipartisan backlash in January for questioning during an interview with The New York Times how terms such as "white supremacist" and "white nationalist" became "offensive."
The comments were quickly denounced and House Republicans responded by removing King from his positions on the House Judiciary, Agriculture and Small Business committees.
The House also overwhelmingly passed a resolution condemning white nationalism and white supremacy by a 424-1 vote. The embattled lawmaker voted in favor of the resolution.
The lawmaker denounced white supremacist ideologies at the time and reiterated his stance on Wednesday. He also told the crowd that he supports his defense of the West, calling the United States "the flagship for Western civilization."
King claimed that political insiders told him that the controversy surrounding his comments was part of a plot to remove him from office, The Register reported.
"People think it was an organic media feeding frenzy, but no, it was orchestrated from the beginning," he said. "They had told me, heads up before Christmas, they're going to try to drive you out of office and get you to resign. Within 24 hours, you had people saying 'resign, resign, resign.' Why? Because the New York Times misquoted me?"