|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 |
We've all seen that McCown just isn't very bright when it comes to risk assessment. We've seen him in 4 games as a brown and just about each one of them multiple times he takes a risk with his body. He has kind of a "hold my beer and watch this" mentality. Oakland has some guys that can put a thumping on him if he's not smart. So does he last the game? Way to cheer on your TEAM....  
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Bill Belichick never lies.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,306
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,306 |
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Right. If injected with a magical substance that made him tell the truth, he would say he wants his Hall of Fame QB to not risk injury for a short term goal. Because he wants to win.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,306
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,306 |
Once about a time in a land far, far away. That's how you should start a fairy tale when your going to tell it my friend 
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,435 |
I don't think the loss this past Sunday was McCowns' fault.
With that being said though, if we're not winning, I give him 2-3 more games tops.
I see the logic in playing McCown if you honestly think you have enough talent to win games and compete for the playoffs, but if the team is struggling and losing, there really isn't a reason to continue sitting Manziel. Let him get the experience.
"You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064 |
Didn't Pett start making the noise about starter at QB being a "week to week" deal in the NFL. That isn't true for the established "name" QB's.
Setting the table for a potential change perhaps. The repeated overthrows and missed deeper routes are hard to stomach. Schwartz could help him out; so would a pass rush, tackling, and a runner. Lose the "FB in name only" or get Vickers back here.
I like the idea of a Mannziel/ Crowell/ Johnson backfield set.
"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums The Archives 2015 NFL Season Looking Back: Browns 20 Oakland
27 How long does McCown last
