Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns GM Andrew Berry: ‘No rule against extending’ Deshaun Watson’s contract; QB battle is performance-based Ballpeen 04/01/26 10:07 AM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Originally Posted by Razorthorns
The one who lit it up with Kevin were the ones who ignored him like Flacco and Winston. What if we discover that the problem wasn't Watson but Kevin?

rofl

I agree it deserves at least a chuckle, but maybe not a full out roll on the floor. Some systems don't fit a player and it's possible that Kevin's system and Watson were like oil and vinegar.
18 638 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Give me a break lampdogg 04/01/26 06:16 AM
I gotta be honest I love Kit-Kat bars. You guys get Coffee Crisp down the USA?
6 249 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: New Rule Changes for 2026 superbowldogg 03/31/26 11:56 PM
Plan to assist replacement refs among approved NFL rules changes

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48358865/plan-assist-replacement-refs-five-approved-nfl-rules

PHOENIX -- NFL owners approved two significant changes to the league's replay review system Tuesday, one that is contingent on the NFL using replacement officials this season and one that will take effect whether or not there is an officiating work stoppage.

The NFL and NFL Referees Association broke off collective bargaining last week as a May 31 expiration of their contract looms. The league has already begun collecting names of college officials who could serve as replacements during the preseason and possibly the regular season, if needed.

The first set of Tuesday's approved changes will create a massive expansion of authority for staffers in the league's officiating command center in New York City, allowing them to consult with the on-field referee on a wide variety of called and uncalled penalties and other administrative procedures.

Rich McKay, co-chairman of the NFL's competition committee, said the league would reallocate existing gameday employees to ensure appropriate staffing levels to cover each game if a work stoppage activates these rule changes. NFL owners are "alarmed" about the state of negotiations, sources said over the weekend, and NFL executive vice president Jeff Miller said Tuesday that owners are "insistent upon" a new CBA that provides avenues to improve the state of NFL officiating.

Editor's Picks

Sources: NFL set to begin hiring replacement refs
Kevin Seifert and Kalyn Kahler

Browns pull proposal to trade picks 5 years out
"That's where we are in these negotiations," Miller said, "and that's exactly where we're going to stay."

According to verbiage in the rule, staff members in New York could alert a replacement referee if they see clear and obvious evidence of an uncalled foul for roughing the passer, intentional grounding or an act that would normally lead to disqualification.

Those staff members would also be permitted to alert replacement referees that a flag shouldn't have been thrown if there is clear and obvious video evidence that "at least one element of the foul called is not present," according to the verbiage.

Fouls eligible for this alert include: twisting, pulling or turning the face mask; roughing the passer; intentional grounding; horse-collar tackles; illegal contact; pass interference; and disqualification.

In 2019, the NFL conducted a one-year experiment that subjected pass interference to replay review. The effort bogged down amid a muddled standard for overturning an on-field decision. In Tuesday's approved rule, the competition committee limited league staff members' involvement to only circumstances where "there was inadvertent tangling of feet when both players were playing the ball or neither player was playing the ball."

In addition, after the two-minute warning or in overtime, the list of called or uncalled penalties that league staff members could provide referees with would expand to include unsportsmanlike conduct based on punching or kicking at an opponent. During kicks, league staff members could also consult on the leverage and leaping rules.

Finally, throughout a game, league staff members could assist on discerning whether a foul should be classified as roughing or running into the kicker.

NFL team employees received a memo over the weekend prohibiting public discussion of the NFLRA negotiations.

On Tuesday, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said, "the negotiations haven't progressed the way hoped from a timing standpoint."

Dallas Cowboys owner and CEO and co-chair of the competition committee Stephen Jones declined to talk about the contingency plan Monday, "out of respect for the process and ongoing negotiations." Multiple head coaches also declined to comment on officiating throughout the meetings.

New England Patriots coach and competition committee member Mike Vrabel said in jest, "I think we should just have coaches call fouls."

"I trust the league," San Francisco 49ers owner Jed York told ESPN on Monday. "I don't deal with that piece of the NFL. I'm not on any committees that deal with it, so whatever they're going to do, I trust the league's operations."

Another club owner who requested anonymity told ESPN: "We have to be prepared for everything."

Cowboys owner and general manager Jerry Jones said Tuesday he viewed the contingency plan as a first step to having more input from New York overall even with the regular officials.

"I think we're in for some great future days of getting better all the way around, and we all think we can do a great job of zeroing in and training and looking for nuances to help the decision making regarding the calls on the field. We all think that," he said. "Everybody's been striving, that's nothing new, to try to get better. But it's our job to put the incentives in place and demands in place to get better. Fans deserve that."

Meanwhile, the second change to replay review will represent a notable shift for owners who have previously sought to limit its scope. For the first time, replay officials in New York will have the authority to both disqualify a player and direct that a penalty be enforced even if on-field officials had not thrown a flag, in the case of either a flagrant football act or non-football act. It takes effect independent of negotiations with the NFLRA.

Previously, owners have not wanted replay officials to throw a flag because they wanted to preserve that for the discretion of on-field officials. The original wording of Tuesday's rule change did not allow replay officials to throw a flag. But McKay said it was amended when multiple coaches said there should be an on-field impact if the act is flagrant enough to merit disqualification.

"They said, 'Hey, if we're going to do this, we have to put a flag on, because we cannot have a fourth-and-2 show up, they disqualified a player from the previous play for a non-football act -- he's punched somebody, he's done whatever -- and the team still has to punt,'" McKay said.

McKay said he foresees a continued effort to expand replay review and assist in the near future but said: "We've stayed true to the idea that we want replay assist, and we want New York to be able to help, and we just don't want to move too fast. We don't want to add too much to it."

In other changes, owners approved:

• A rule that eliminates a team's incentive to kick the ball out of bounds on kickoffs from the 50-yard line.

• Allowing teams to declare an onside kick at any point in a game. This change arose because teams wanted to be able to use an onside kick if a penalty enforcement led to them kicking off from the 50.


• A modification of alignment requirements on the kickoff for members of the receiving team in the setup zone, aligning the kickoff rule with the original intent of special teams coaches who developed it in 2024. The NFL thinks it could address an increase in the concussion rate on kickoffs.

• Approved an expansion of its mental health coverage to require each team to employ a full-time clinician or offer full-time coverage. Eight of the 32 teams already are in compliance. It is subject to approval by the NFL Players Association because it's part of the collective bargaining agreement. The policy will also provide more support for players on injured reserve.

• A rule that permit players on the reserve/physically unable to perform list to begin a 21-day practice period after the team's second game of the regular season.

ESPN's Todd Archer contributed to this report.
1 62 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cleveland Guardians 2.0 IrishDawg42 03/31/26 08:39 PM
Originally Posted by Frenchy
If Kwan starts 81 games in LF, and 81 games in CF, would he be eligible for a gold glove at either position?

Yes, but, they need 713 innings which is an out over 79 games. The qualifying states, they count the innings towards the position they use the most, so it is nearly impossible. He would have to have the same amount of innings at both positions AND have the minimum number of innings played at each position. It would be an anomaly that would never be repeated if he did it.

Edit: Never mind, I just saw you said either position, not both positions. That is a little more likely actually.
114 8,273 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iranian War PitDAWG 03/31/26 05:20 PM
You're not supposed to say the quiet part out loud Donald...........

'They Call It A War': Trump Reveals Real Reason He Keeps Calling Iran War Something Else

The president made an apparent slip of the tongue followed by a stunning explanation.

President Donald Trump on Friday admitted during his keynote address at the Future Investment Initiative Priority Summit in Miami that there are “legal reasons” for his minimizing rhetoric on the Iran War, stating, “We call it a military operation. We don’t call it a war.”

Minutes later, however, Trump referred to it as a “war” himself, before making a correction.

“See, I get into a war — of course, they call it a war, I call it a military conflict,” Trump said Friday. “But there’s a legal reason for that.”

He delved into more detail about the terminology later in his speech.

“I said, ‘Look, you know, we have a thing called a war,’ or as they would rather say, a military operation. It’s for legal reasons,” said Trump. “I say ‘military’ because as a military operation, I don’t need any approvals. As a war, you’re supposed to get approval from Congress. Something like that.”

In his address, the MAGA leader slammed his “friends,” including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, for wavering on assisting the U.S. or helping secure the Strait of Hormuz before the bombing has ended.

He also admitted being “very disappointed” that NATO “didn’t come to our aid,” only to claim he didn’t “try too hard” to get its help because he wanted to “prove a point.”

Trump went on to thank “the entire Kingdom of Saudi Arabia” for jumping onboard the “military conflict,” which has already killed at least 13 U.S. military service members and more than 1,400 Iranians.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-trump-wont-call-it-a-war_n_69c7da7fe4b06be0a3086c0a
311 9,311 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Xichigan Coach Sherrone Moore Fired FATE 03/31/26 03:39 PM
17 1,318 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? PitDAWG 03/31/26 03:39 PM
Kid Rock gets visit from Apache Helicopters.



And why were military helicopters sent to fly over a No Kings rally? Murica!
226 21,387 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump administration denounces CNN for airing messages from Iranian leaders PitDAWG 03/31/26 02:27 PM
An all out admission that this administration is at war with and thinks that using the power of the government through the FCC and official government websites to silence anything negative about them is somehow not against the costutution. History has seen this movie before.............

FCC’s Brendan Carr: Trump is ‘winning’ against ‘fake news media’

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr on Friday said at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) that President Trump is “winning” his feud against the “fake news media.”

Carr told the audience that other politicians “gave way to the legacy national media,” unlike Trump, who the FCC chief said “smashed the façade.”

“President Trump took on the fake news media and President Trump is winning,” he continued. “Look at the results so far. PBS defunded. NPR defunded. Joy Reid, gone from MSNBC. Sleepy-Eyed Chuck Todd, gone. Jim Acosta, gone. John Dickerson, gone. [Stephen] Colbert is leaving. CBS is under new ownership, and soon enough CNN is going to have new ownership as well.”

Paramount Skydance is helmed by David Ellison, the son of Trump ally and Oracle CEO Larry Ellison. The company purchased CBS News last year and tapped conservative writer Bari Weiss as editor-in-chief. The parent company also won its bid to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, which oversees CNN, in February.

David Ellison has said the CNN’s editorial strategy will serve a more politically “diverse” audience; similar remarks were made previously about CBS News.

Carr added on Friday that “we’re not at the point yet –– you know, waving the ‘mission accomplished’ flag,” but repeated that the president is “winning.”

In December, Carr suggested that the FCC was not independent from the administration, despite the website previously labeling it as an “independent government agency responsible for implementing and enforcing America’s communications law and regulations.” The word “independent” was removed after the agency’s chief testified before lawmakers.

He recently threatened to crack down on broadcasters over their coverage of the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran. He wrote earlier this month that broadcasters could have problems renewing their licenses due to their coverage, accusing them of “running hoaxes and news distortions.”

Trump’s war on the news media goes back several years, first amplified during his first campaign for the presidency in 2016. The president has accused much of legacy news media as being “fake news” and has preferred conservative media with reporting favorable toward him and both of his administrations.

Following his return to the White House last year, Trump warned mainstream media outlets that they were “on notice” after ABC and Paramount Global, before it merged with Skydance, settled lawsuits with the administration.

The White House also released a “media bias” tracker on its website in November to accuse news reports of omitting context and claim that they include lies, mischaracterization, bias or malpractice. It features an “offender hall of shame” headlined by The Washington Post, MS Now, CBS News, CNN, The New York Times, Politico and the Wall Street Journal.

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5805710-brendan-carr-fcc-donald-trump-media-feud-cpac/
5 230 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump's Third Term? PitDAWG 03/31/26 02:15 PM
In an effort to pwn the libs he didn't pay attention to that part. You know how that works.
9 345 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Myles Razorthorns 03/30/26 11:07 PM
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by Razorthorns
Myles is untradable because he has a no trade clause. The only teams that would be able to make a trade worth him are all teams Myles would never agree to go to. Completely untradable.

I don't know what you mean?

There probably isn't a team in the league who wouldn't want Myles. If you are talking about value to us from a pick standpoint, obviously a team with a pick in the late 20's or more would have to pony up more over a team projected to have a top 10 pick.

You have to remember, if and when we trade Myles, we would be trading him. We wouldn't be including any of our own picks.

The bare minimum trade for Myles should be three number 1 picks. Myles wants to be traded to a contender not a loser. 3 first round picks from say Seattle are pretty much garbage vs say 3 from the jets. Myles can block any trade to a team that sucks and has picks worth taking. I just can't see ANY team offering what it would take to get Myles that Myles would agree to go to. Thus he is untradeable.
38 1,778 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Random NFL News Squires 03/30/26 10:14 PM
21 1,144 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns News 6.0 Milk Man 03/30/26 09:50 PM
All is right in the world, now.

320 25,212 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 mgh888 03/30/26 01:32 PM
87 3,002 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: More Music Ballpeen 03/30/26 01:11 AM
I heard this today scrolling through youtube on the TV. It has over a million views in 8 days, and I can see why. This is Paul Walkers brother, of Fast and Furious.

Powerful song IMO.

134 7,037 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Official bonefish 03/27/26 10:41 AM
Thx.

What a day walking around and my mind kept repeating. "My daughter is a doctor."

Her brother I coached in baseball for over ten years. We shared some great moments together.

Work was always a method to make money. Being a father has always been my joy.
11 261 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump urges Republicans to 'take over' and 'nationalize' voting BADdog 03/25/26 03:44 AM
Maybe the republican would have won If he didn't mail on his ballot
93 3,280 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Player News superbowldogg 03/24/26 11:21 PM
Originally Posted by IrishDawg42
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
I really don't think Tate is going to be a #1 in the NFL. To me, he looks like a great #2 that will catch the ball.

If this was other years, he would probably be drafted late in the first or second round.


He is a great #2 to Jeremiah Smith, but JS is going to enter the league like Ja'Marr Chase did. He is generational, which is why Tate might "look" a little less when seeing them on the field together. However, Carnell Tate is equal or better than many of the receivers that have recently come into the draft. He is a better prospect than Jaxon Smith-Njigba, who was drafted #20 overall because he was in a loaded draft class. He was the first of four receivers taken in his draft in the first round.

Curious question, what in his game leads you to being a #2 receiver?

If this were other years, he would be exactly where he is today. He is a top WR candidate, which barring prospects like Jeremiah Smith or Ja'Marr Chase, he would still be in the talk as the best receiver in his class coming out.

First WR off the board the last ten years:
2025 Tet McMillan #8, Tate is rated higher
2024 Marvin Harrison Jr. drafted #4 overall, Tate would have been #3 receiver in 2024, Nabers was 2nd receiver drafted at #6 overall and Tate is rated just below him, both predicted year 1 starter.
2023 Jaxon Smith-Njigba #20, Tate is rated higher
2022 Drake London #8, Tate is rated higher
2021 Ja'Marr Chase#5, pretty obvious, Jaylen Waddle #6 was top ten pick #2 receiver, Tate is on par with Waddle
2020 Henry Ruggs #12 and Jerry Jeudy #15 were the first two WRs, Tate is rated much higher
2019 Bad draft class, but Tate would unquestionably be the top receiver in this draft, best of the class was Marquise Browns #25 overall
2018 Another bad draft, DJ Moore #24 was the first WR taken, but was rated much lower than Tate
2017 Corey Davis drafted #5 overall, Tate is rated higher
2016 Corey Coleman #15 was the first WR drafted, Tate is rated higher

All of these receivers were taken mid first or higher. All of those of those rated higher than him went top ten, many he is rated higher than still went top ten.

In this case, which I know it happens a lot, we don't have rose colored glasses on a Buckeye. He deserves the accolades he is getting. Having Smith and Tate on the field at the same time was a blessing for OSU, but it did take away individual stats. Tate is one of the best WR prospects of the last ten years.


To me he is a guy that will do great in the X vs the Y and I think he will do well working the middle of the field while making contested catches. I don't think he will thrive on the edge where he needs toe tap/ sideline catches often. I also feel like he won't do that great if he is moved around often.

in 2025 he would have been drafted after Emeka Egbuka | Travis Hunter Tetairoa McMillan Emeka Egbuka Matthew Golden Jayden Higgins Luther Burden Tre Harris Jack Bech
In 2024 he would have been drafted after Brian Thomas and before Xavier Worthy | Marvin Harrison Malik Nabers Rome Odunze Brian Thomas Xavier Worthy Ricky Pearsall Xavier Legette Keon Coleman Ladd McConkey Ja'Lynn Polk Adonai Mitchell
2023 right after Jordan Addison | Jaxon Smith-Njigba Quentin Johnston Zay Flowers Jordan Addison Jonathan Mingo Jayden Reed Rashee Rice Marvin Mims
2022 probably drafted right after Jameson Williams | Drake London Garrett Wilson Chris Olave Jameson Williams Jahan Dotson Treylon Burks Christian Watson Wan'Dale Robinson
2021 right after DeVonta Smith and before Kadarius Toney | Ja'Marr Chase Jaylen Waddle DeVonta Smith Kadarius Toney Rashod Bateman
2020 after Tee Higgins maybe after Michael Pittman. | Henry Ruggs Jerry Jeudy CeeDee Lamb Jalen Reagor Justin Jefferson Brandon Aiyuk Tee Higgins Michael Pittman Laviska Shenault
277 20,822 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Robert Mueller, former FBI director who led Trump investigation, dies at 81 mgh888 03/23/26 07:59 PM
I think your summary is pretty spot on. He was put into an unwinnable position - he did the job as he saw it correctly and thoroughly and with an unbiased, non political agenda. Politics swept him up and vilified him which given his straight as an arrow reputation, military service and having been a registered Republican, was just sad and I guess an indication of the times and the impact of MAGA and the likes of Steve Bannon and company.

It is worth remembering that the reason for the inquiry/report was justified. Many people were prosecuted on the back of the report. As someone above mentioned Mueller always maintained it was not the reports purpose to say the PoTUS committed obstruction but to report the facts and let Congress decide.

With regards specifically to Trump the report did not exonerate him and stated: "If we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so" ... The report then provided what were 11 examples of behaviour exhibiting "Potential Obstruction". . . . including: Ordering White House Counsel Don McGahn to have Mueller fired (McGahn refused and threatened to resign). AND Privately sending messages of support to Flynn and Manafort; suggesting pardons to discourage them from cooperating.
11 355 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Quarterback Defined PitDAWG 03/23/26 03:20 PM
I'm not actually sure. I think it certainly has to be an improvement but how much of an improvement is yet to be seen. It seems the signings so far have been players strong in either pass protection or run blocking but not what would be considered well rounded players. I know that scheme also plays a part so it could be that the scheme will make up for some of that.

In the past I've gotten either far too positive or far too negative in terms of FA signings. It's caused me to be much more in a wait and see pattern than a projection pattern.
278 15,829 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: R.I.P. Chuck Norris Ballpeen 03/23/26 11:31 AM
Originally Posted by YTownBrownsFan
Aw man. RIP Chuck.


One huge way that getting old sucks is that so many of the stars I grew up watching are now fading away. frown

I always thought getting old would take longer.
6 343 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: DOJ, FBI conclude Jeffrey Epstein had no "client list," committed suicide northlima dawg 03/22/26 02:43 PM
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article315131144.html



Exclusive: Bags of shredded documents at NY jail after Epstein’s death, officer tells FBI

Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article315131144.html#storylink=cpy
254 22,171 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: This federal judge ruled against Trump. Then the death threats rolled in | 60 Minutes PitDAWG 03/18/26 06:52 PM
Chief Justice John Roberts Says 'Hostility Is Dangerous And It's Got To Stop' After Trump Attacks

Supreme Court Justice John Roberts said President Donald Trump's "hostility is dangerous" after the president raged over the Supreme Court's February tariff ruling against him.

"Personally directed hostility is dangerous and it’s got to stop," Roberts said during an appearance at Rice University in Houston on Tuesday.

Though he didn't mention Trump by name, the message seemed clear. On Sunday, Trump lashed out at the Supreme Court for their 6-3 ruling against him.

“The Court knew where I stood, how badly I wanted this Victory for our Country, and instead decided to, potentially, give away Trillions of Dollars to Countries and Companies who have been taking advantage of the United States for decades,” he wrote in a Truth Social post.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/late...GfB0ueO1AMMnk_aem_mEl211dPUPKfWmFDpLXyAA
3 238 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Cuba Is Next On The List According to trump PitDAWG 03/18/26 02:09 PM
I'm pretending it still exists.
13 487 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: WBC bonefish 03/18/26 10:55 AM
I could not stay awake.

Went to sleep top of 8th down 2-0.

So Harper ties it and then Venezuela won it.

Bummer. But they earned it. Went through the best teams to win it all.

Congratulations to them. Lots going on in their country. They are passionate about the game so I am happy for them.

The Major Leagues schedule is soon to start and all will be well.
2 167 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: The Dems... again FATE 03/16/26 02:43 PM
"But they couldn't reach the American homeland"...

Wow. No biggie then, I guess.


75 2,063 Read More
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5