Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Pure Football Forum
Re: Camp Questions PitDAWG 07/27/26 05:01 PM
I tend to agree with you. But from all indications he didn't want to be here to start with. It was all about the money. Once again this year it's all about the money moving forward.

While as I stated I tend to agree with you in terms of, "I don't think he will ever play at a high level again."

It just appears I'm not just not as convinced as you are that what I think in this case can't be wrong. I don't believe the chances of that happening are very high but I won't close the door on that possibility.

And I certainly hope I'm wrong about the possibility of him having a good season. I would rather see Sanders win the starting role outright. I just hate to imagine the confusion and arguments that would ensue about re-signing watson if he had a good season. What a mess that would turn into.
9 323 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War... MoU and forward PitDAWG 07/27/26 04:50 PM
Tehran appears to test Trump's latest pause

DUBAI, July 27 (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia, Jordan ​and Iraq reported drone attacks on Monday, two days after the United States abruptly suspended a two-week campaign of airstrikes against Iran, as Tehran appeared to put President Donald Trump's ‌latest strategic U-turn to the test.

Saudi Arabia said it shot down drones aimed at petroleum targets, including in the capital Riyadh. It said the drones had been launched from Iraq by Iran-backed armed groups, and it reserved the right to respond.

Separately, Iran's Houthi allies in Yemen said they had targeted transit sites carrying oil to Saudi Arabia's main Red Sea oil port of Yanbu, in retaliation for what they said were Saudi drone incursions into Yemeni airspace.

Earlier, Jordan reported shooting down two drones, and Iraqi security sources ​reported a series of drone attacks in northern Iraq. Officials did not identify the sources of those drones.

Jordan and northern Iraq were the locations where four U.S. service members were killed during the ​two-week air campaign, which Trump suspended abruptly over the weekend after his top brass advised him that the strategy had run its course.

Trump said on Monday that Washington ⁠was in "very deep talks with Iran" and warned he is ready for "strong military action" if diplomacy fails.

"Not much time. Either it goes fast or not at all," he told Axios when asked how long he was ​willing to give for talks.

Iran, however, has said it is not seeking to resume peace talks with the U.S., although it would pause its own attacks for as long as Trump's self-imposed ceasefire continues.

It also said it was ​still in control of the contested Strait of Hormuz, the key waterway for global energy supplies which Trump has demanded vessels be able to pass through freely.

OIL PRICES TUMBLE AFTER TRUMP PAUSES AIRSTRIKES

In his latest strategic reversal over the weekend, which came with no prior announcement, Trump halted a campaign of 13 successive nights of intensifying bombing that had prompted Tehran to fire on U.S. bases in response.

The end of the U.S. campaign sent oil prices tumbling. Brent crude, which had briefly ticked above $100 a barrel last ​week for the first time since May, fell around 6.5% on Monday to just over $90, having touched levels as low as $87.55.

Trump's decision to suspend the campaign reflected advice from his military that the bombing had reached the limits ​of what it could achieve, according to a U.S. official and several U.S. media reports.

The U.S. official told Reuters that military commanders had advised the president they were running out of targets. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ‌General Dan Caine, ⁠had expressed concern over the depletion of air defence munitions, the official said.

REQUEST FOR MORE TALKS 'NOT IN OUR DNA', IRAN SPOKESMAN SAYS

The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, said on Sunday Trump had paused the campaign to allow room for negotiations. Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other U.S. officials have described Iran as "begging for a deal, opens new tab".

But the spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, Esmail Baghaei, said in a televised press conference on Monday that Iran had not asked to resume peace talks with the United States.

Messages were still being passed between the sides through mediators and Iran had not forsaken diplomacy, but "reports about Iran requesting negotiations with the U.S. are fabricated," ​Baghaei said. "This is not in our DNA."

IRAN STATE MEDIA ​SAY SIX SHIPS TURNED BACK IN STRAIT

Several Iranian state ⁠media outlets cited an "informed source" as saying that Iran had turned around six "offending ships" on Monday morning that had attempted to cross the Strait of Hormuz without its permission. One of the vessels, the source said, had had "an accident".

Trump launched his renewed bombing campaign to punish Iran after Tehran fired on ships using a route through ​the strait that has been promoted by the United States, which has told vessels to sail close to the coast of Oman.

Iran says ships may pass ​only through a channel that ⁠runs closer to its own coast, which it controls and where it intends to impose transit fees.

The two weeks of renewed U.S. bombing killed scores of people in Iran and destroyed bridges and tunnels across the south as well as military targets. Four U.S. service members were killed by Iran's return fire against U.S. bases in neighbouring Arab states. Iran also struck civilian infrastructure in Gulf countries in what it said was retaliation for U.S. strikes on civilian targets.

The halt ⁠to the renewed ​U.S. bombing campaign leaves no clear indication of what leverage Washington can exert to achieve Trump's aim to break Iran's grip on ​the strait.

Washington and Tehran reached an agreement in June on a framework for talks meant to take place by the end of August to resolve major issues such as Iran's nuclear programme.

But the sides have disputed the meaning of the memorandum's language about the strait, with Washington ​insisting it requires Tehran to allow free travel while Iran says it grants it the authority to supervise transit.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...ks-after-trump-halts-bombing-2026-07-27/
64 3,253 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: The Dems... again PitDAWG 07/27/26 03:42 PM
I don't believe that FOX News provides him with those details.
331 18,807 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Robert Duvall hitt 07/27/26 01:20 PM
I came from a strict military father also, Robert sure got the role right-- bouncing the basketball off his son's head and the puke scene with all his guys chowing down were some great movie parts-- in Lonesome Dove he sure got the "integrity of life well spent right"-- RIP Robert.
13 874 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Myles Garrett Traded IrishDawg42 07/27/26 12:07 PM
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by IrishDawg42
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Quote
There is a lot to worry about the Browns 2026 season, the talent level of the defense isn't one of them.

Worry might not be the word, I would say concern. If I do that, I have concerns about the corner position. I think we are thin at that position.

I think this is an idealistic point of view. ESPN polled all nfl coaches and execs and Ward ranked #7. They ranked the top ten, but 14 others received votes, Tyson Campbell was one of the 14. So according to everyone that matters in the NFL, the Browns have two of the best 24 CBs in the league. Campbell was #3 in passes defended.

What I mean by idealistic is, it would be ideal to have a pro bowl level player at every position and back up position, but no team in the NFL will ever have that, it’s impossible. I think Myles Harden, Myles Bryant and Damari Mathis are all quality players. Even if they wouldn’t start for half the league, they are more than capable when one of the others go down.

I’m extremely happy with the starters we have in that room.

Ward and Campbell are fine. No complaints there even if injury seems to plague Ward season after season. After that we are thin.

Again, I see it as a concern but am not losing sleep over it, at least at this point.

I would love to see Sanders succeed at a high level NOW. It that happened, we would be able to strengthen this team through the draft. I don't disagree with your concern, I do think it will be addressed in the draft though rather than through free agency. Unless they sell the farm for a QB, I think CB will be addressed within the first two rounds in 2027. They are all about getting younger.
256 16,578 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Watson vs Sanders? hitt 07/27/26 11:47 AM
People in journalism?/media?/ politics- do/say anything to get clicks, be the story, get some coverage/MONEY--- Watson or Sanders- I don't "LIKE" either one of them- "tainted character" vs "showboat/ glamour guy", neither appeal to me. I hope we play the guy who gives us the best chance to WIN.

Watson ain't old- he could have YEARS to go as a player if he gets in right system again....or they play to his strengths......GO Browns!!!
34 1,395 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Many Australians Can Now Get 3 Free Hours of Electricity Per Day Ballpeen 07/27/26 11:11 AM
Great, they get free power from free solar panels.

It sounds like an effort to lower the high demand period when people come home from work and turn on lights and air conditioners. If it works and lessens the strain on the system great, though I still say it isn't "free".
7 166 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Random NFL News hitt 07/27/26 12:06 AM
I'm very happy for one of our many past QBs- J. Brissett got a deserved pay raise from the Ariz Cardinals. He's a class act and hope we does well against everyone but us.
73 7,678 Read More
Tailgate Forum
Re: Cleveland Guardians 2.0 waterdawg 07/26/26 07:00 PM
What an embarrassment this team is at the plate .. Poor pitching staff ,,, And what is the deal with the Teams MLB site ? Needs refreshedf big time
178 18,140 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Communism or Socialism PitDAWG 07/26/26 06:18 PM
What do you call it when the trump administration takes taxpayer money and invests roughly $26.7 billion across 30 equity or quasi-equity deals with private companies and corporations?

The U.S. government invested $27 billion in corporate stakes. Good luck finding them

The Trump administration has invested roughly $26.7 billion across 30 equity or quasi-equity deals, headlined by a 9.9% stake in chipmaker Intel that's now worth $42 billion.

Others include $400 million into rare-earth miner MP Materials to loosen China's grip on magnet supply chains, the "golden share" in U.S. Steel retained as a condition of its sale to Japan's Nippon Steel, or the flurry of stakes in quantum computing firms.

But with all that dealmaking, those wary of government's corruptive tendencies—and of President Donald Trump's own trading—might want to see some transparency. The portfolio, however, is nowhere to be found.

There is no consolidated ledger of the government's holdings; the stakes sit scattered across at least four agencies: 17 deals through Commerce, seven through Defense, six through the Development Finance Corporation, two through Energy. Only one of those, the Development Finance Corporation, has clear statutory authority to own equity at all, under a framework Congress built in 2018 for development deals abroad.

The White House did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. A Treasury spokesperson said agencies report equity interests "in different ways" depending on the legal authority behind each stake.

Some of the "stakes" are signed agreements, while others, including nine quantum computing deals Commerce announced in a single week, remain more ambiguous, closer to term sheets. The most complete public accounting of Washington's portfolio is kept by the Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank.

"The deals that have been announced to date are only the tip of the iceberg," Jonathan Hillman, the Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow who maintains that tracker, told Fortune, "and the real test will be whether Washington can build a system to effectively manage its growing portfolio of investments over the long run."

The best-documented stake in the portfolio is the biggest one. Intel's August 2025 securities filings name the shareholder: the United States Department of Commerce, counterparty to a "Warrant and Common Stock Agreement" covering 433.3 million shares at $20.47 apiece. It's a passive stake, with no board seat or information rights, and the government has agreed to vote with Intel's board on most matters.

Yet some aspects of the deal, in the filings, look strange. Roughly two-thirds of the shares were delivered to Commerce when the deal closed; the rest sit in escrow to be released as Intel hits milestones under a Pentagon chip program, meaning a slice of the government's marquee holding is not yet in the government's hands. The claw-back and profit-sharing provisions attached to Intel's earlier $2.2 billion CHIPS Act grant were also eliminated. Grants have strings that these stocks don't.

In addition, ethics filings revealed that accounts held in the president's own name began buying Intel in March, months after his administration's stake sent the stock soaring. No insider trading has been alleged, and the White House says his assets sit in a trust managed by his children; but Trump's personal holdings are unprecedented for the modern presidency.

For the government's stakes in private companies—such as Vulcan Elements, xLight, and others—no public securities filings with the SEC exist at all.

Even where the shares can be found, the money is tricky to follow. Federal budget rules, mostly designed for grants and loans, treat an equity purchase as an outlay—money out the door—with very little mechanism for recognizing what comes back, according to research by William Henagan, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. That means the Intel position's rise from $8.9 billion to $42 billion appears in no budget document.

The Development Finance Corporation, established by Congress in 2018 to make equity investments abroad, is one exception. But the framework has a narrow lens: it was designed for financing ports in developing countries. Yet now it is the closest thing Washington has to a legal template for owning chipmakers.

A DFC spokesperson told Fortune it records its equity postions as investment assets and manages the ownership on a case-by-case basis.

The federal government has held corporate equity at scale once before, and it did so under supervision. The Troubled Asset Relief Program, the $700 billion rescue fund Congress created in October 2008 at the height of the financial crisis, came with a statutory special inspector general who filed quarterly reports to Congress, plus a congressional oversight panel and standing GAO audits to boot.

But even that apparatus was judged insufficient: in 2009, the program's own inspector general told Congress that taxpayers weren't being told what recipients were doing with their money.

Today's sprawling portfolio has none of that. The administration, for its part, has never claimed otherwise; it has hinted the stakes are the start of something bigger.

"It's like a down payment on a sovereign wealth fund, which many countries have," Kevin Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC after the Intel deal was announced.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/u-government-invested-27-billion-120000768.html
0 31 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 PitDAWG 07/26/26 04:16 PM
Today president Donald Trump announced that he had appointed Captain Jack Sparrow to be in charge of re-opening the Strait of Hormuz.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth could not be reached for comment.

naughtydevil
193 11,428 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: 25TH Amendment discussion PitDAWG 07/26/26 02:03 PM
At least the Democrats were smart enough not to run him for re-election. rofl
4 138 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Federal judge says Trump administration must restore disaster money to Democratic states PitDAWG 07/26/26 02:02 PM
This was obvious all along but it's still quite surprising they would openly admit it. Which begs to question....

Quote
The Trump administration is coming clean now, it said, because it wanted to avoid the government having to participate in the discovery process for the lawsuit.

............... if they are willing to openly admit to this, what in the hell are they trying to hide in the discovery process?
8 274 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Goofy Immortal Part Deux Clemdawg 07/26/26 03:53 AM
I got to admit.. I laughed out loud at this one.
112 18,497 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: What If? IrishDawg42 07/25/26 05:16 PM
Money money money money… money


I don’t think he has cared to this point, but now he’s playing for a contract. My hope is that his arm remains sore, he is limited in training camp and Monken sets him aside.

Let’s get ready for the season with Shedeur and see what happens.
230 17,294 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Mitch McConnell PitDAWG 07/25/26 04:17 PM
Day 41 of McConnell still missing.....................

"But what about that ten days that one time?"
36 1,173 Read More
Tailgate Forum
Re: Cavs/NBA 3.0 Bard Dawg 07/25/26 02:39 PM
Good riddance then. More of the same games he played before e when he left us. Thanks for the ring. LeBron is Frodo: He keeps disappearing. fan up, y'all.
14 1,108 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump will speak on elections in primetime address after pushing debunked conspiracies Damanshot 07/25/26 11:48 AM
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by oobernoober
For the cost part, there are programs to mitigate or defer the financial cost of getting a license or state ID.

I wish people would quit making the affordability claim. Anybody who wants an ID can afford to get one. They cost maybe $20 and are good for a number of years.

It's a stupid argument. Civic responsibility is real. As long as some states allow voting without ID, their election results should and will always be questioned. People who think that no ID required is a good thing have no problem with rigged election results.

I agree with you, but I think there's still work to be done. IMO, it should be relatively painless for someone that should have a state/federal ID to get a state/federal ID. That's pie-in-the-sky type stuff, but it should be what the relevant agencies should be working towards.

But you are right (IMO). Civic responsibility should outweigh personal inconvenience.

I have no problem with that, nor making them really inexpensive if not free.

I have one of those Drivers Licenses that have the star on it. I had to show my Birth Certificate and some other items to Verify who I am.

The Birth Cert I showed had the stamp on it... It was an Original.


Did you know that that is not an acceptable form of ID for the Save Act?

I'm convinced that the Save Act is nothing more than a way to suppress the vote. I thought that was illegal!
88 2,520 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Browns News cont. oobernoober 07/24/26 01:04 PM
It's being reported that Judkins is officially a "full-go" for Training Camp.

Remembering back to the game where he went down with the knee/leg, this is absolutely phenomenal.
88 7,471 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? PitDAWG 07/21/26 03:44 PM
Tate brothers' lawyer calls for Trump to block UK extradition request amid new charges

7 283 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: More Music PitDAWG 07/21/26 03:22 PM
202 17,458 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Fun with ai PitDAWG 07/21/26 03:15 PM
I believe that eventually you are correct. After all that is the goal and I don't look for them to stop until they achieve that goal. The "some are further out" part is the most likely scenario. That's most likely the best one can do at this point.
21 1,443 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump Promoted Companies on Truth Social Days After Buying Their Stocks PitDAWG 07/17/26 01:53 PM
If only you had any idea what that meant Joe McCarthy.
14 276 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? PitDAWG 07/15/26 04:15 PM
Trump endorses MyPillow's Mike Lindell in race for Minnesota governor

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/trump-endorses-mypillow-mike-lindell-for-minnesota-governor/

This sounds more like something that belongs in the joke thread but it's actually true.
390 38,480 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump will Keep Jet Qutar Gifted the U.S. For Presidential Library PitDAWG 07/14/26 04:47 PM
New Air Force One Lacks Defensive Countermeasures of Previous Model, Officials Say

Experts said the lack of such capabilities poses a potential risk when the president travels overseas. The White House defended the aircraft’s safety.

The new Air Force One, which President Trump flew on earlier this week to Turkey, lacks the same defensive countermeasures that were security features of the old model, including its advanced antimissile capabilities, according to multiple officials who have been briefed on how the jet was retrofitted.

Experts say the absence of those capabilities on the Boeing 747-8 aircraft, which was donated by Qatar, creates potential risk in using the jet abroad, a dynamic underscored by the abrupt decision on Wednesday for Mr. Trump to leave Turkey on the old Air Force One at the urging of the Secret Service.

The episode is intensifying the focus on Mr. Trump’s demands to rapidly retrofit the donated 747 to replace an aging fleet that had served as the official presidential planes.

Lawmakers have called on the administration to disclose whether the overhaul of the Qatari plane, which the Air Force oversaw in the course of the last year, provided sufficient security upgrades. The safety of the aircraft is critical not only for the president, but also for the large entourage of White House staff, Secret Service officials, journalists and guests who fly aboard.

Mr. Trump pushed for the new plane to be put into use as quickly as possible and frequently complained that the old presidential aircraft was not impressive enough to take on international trips.

On Thursday, the White House did not address specific questions about the new plane’s capabilities, but defended its safety.

“The new Air Force One is a state-of-the-art aircraft that has been fitted with high-level security protocols that ensure the safety of the president and his staff,” Steven Cheung, the communications director, said in a statement. “As the president has said recently, there are many enemies of America who have their sights on him, and we use every tool at our disposal to address those threats.”

The Air Force has declined to discuss specifics around security systems on the retrofitted Qatari plane, which is being used as a “bridge” aircraft while two Boeing jets that will be part of the permanent presidential fleet are being finished.

But in a statement it made when it announced that the donated jet was ready to transport the president, it acknowledged that the temporary plane did not have all the equipment usually found on an Air Force One.

“No risk was taken in security, safety or mission communications,” the Air Force said in a statement on June 19. “But the collective team made trades on some of the less commonly used mission sets that Boeing must deliver to support the next 40 years.”

The Air Force would not say what it meant by “less commonly used mission sets.”

However, officials who have been briefed on the retrofitting of the Qatari jet, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe its security features, said it did not have the same counter-defensive capabilities of the previous model.

Two former Air Force officials, who had both been involved in the effort to replace the older Air Force One planes, said they were surprised to see Mr. Trump fly on the new jet overseas, where there are greater security risks. Turkey, where Mr. Trump attended a NATO summit, borders Iran, which the United States pummeled with renewed strikes this week.

The former officials were not involved with the retrofitting of the Qatari jet, but said the speed of the project meant there would not have been enough time to make all of the security modifications that are traditionally associated with a fully equipped presidential aircraft.

“Time didn’t permit all the normal Air Force One modifications, so some mix of security, communications and support is missing,” said Frank Kendall, the former Air Force secretary who was in charge of the department as it tried to push Boeing to accelerate its long-delayed contract to deliver two new Air Force One planes.

“With the Iran situation, this could be of concern,” Mr. Kendall said. “Frankly, I’m surprised to see this plane used outside the U.S.”

Andrew P. Hunter, the former Air Force assistant secretary who was in charge of the Air Force One program during the Biden administration, also said that a true retrofit of a 747 jet to prepare it to become Air Force One would require more than a year of work.

The day before Mr. Trump left for Turkey, Senate Democrats wrote to the Air Force asking questions about the modifications to the Qatari plane and questioning whether it had all the necessary security upgrades.

“Trump’s own statements — including his celebration of ‘a level of luxury that nobody’s ever seen before’ — make it clear that these decisions prioritized Trump’s personal comfort and tastes over U.S. national security,” they wrote in the letter sent by Senator Christopher S. Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, and 12 other senators.

The older planes that served as Air Force One included a defensive system designed to defeat heat-seeking missiles. That capacity is also planned to be included in the new Boeing planes, according to three former Pentagon officials.

Different parts of the defensive systems are visible on the old Air Force One, under the wing of the plane and on its tail. They are not observable in photographs of the new Qatari plane, according to a third former Air Force official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the security protocols.

Missile defense systems on Air Force One have seen little use in the history of the aircraft, but have nevertheless been considered critical aspects of the plane’s security features.

The Pentagon published specifications for the Boeing aircraft now under construction that indicate the new jets will include a “self-defense system” and “mission communication system,” as these and other upgrades are needed “to enable the president to execute the duties of head of state, chief executive, and commander in chief.”

U.S. officials have said that Iran has been targeting Mr. Trump since he ordered the drone strike that killed Qassim Suleimani, in January 2020. During the 2024 campaign, the Secret Service increased protection for Mr. Trump, even before the attempt on his life in Butler, Pa., because of intelligence about Iran’s plotting against him.

Despite the resumption of intense U.S. strikes on Iran, American policymakers briefed on the current intelligence do not believe that Iran has a current plan to kill Mr. Trump during this period. A U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe intelligence assessments, said that Iran had a clear understanding of what kind of deep provocation any attempt on Mr. Trump’s life would be and the intensity of an American response.

Nevertheless, the Secret Service was concerned enough about Mr. Trump’s proximity to the country while in Ankara to force the president to swap planes on the way out of the country, as The New York Times first reported Wednesday.

In announcing the change, Mr. Trump offered a different story: He claimed that he was flying out on the old plane so the new jet could leave early and make stops at U.S. military bases to show it off to the troops because the aircraft is “magnificent.”

One former senior White House official involved in discussions about military aircraft used for presidential travel said that there were frequently points of tension between White House staff and the military advisers and Secret Service over travel plans when security questions emerged.

But when the military experts demanded changes, White House officials generally let them prevail, with “course of action” plans that mitigated potential threats.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/09/us/politics/new-air-force-one-defensive-countermeasures.html

And in response to the NYT exposing their incompetence.........................

DOJ subpoenas NYT journalists over Air Force One report

The Trump administration hit four New York Times journalists with subpoenas on Friday, after the outlet published a story outlining risks involving President Trump’s Qatar-gifted Air Force One plane that recently entered into service.

The Times reported that the refurbished jet lacked some of the advanced security measures of the older aircraft used to transport the president.

The reporters include Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager and Eric Schmitt. They also wrote earlier this week that a security precaution forced Trump to depart to the NATO summit in Turkey on the old Air Force One, were called to testify next week before a federal grand jury in Manhattan “in regard to an alleged violation of federal criminal law.” The switch-up also raised red flags around potential threats against the president from Iran after the U.S. launched fresh strikes on the Islamic Republic earlier this week.

The outlet noted that before publication, a senior FBI official contacted it requesting to halt the article for national security reasons but declined to provide details. The subpoenas were reportedly delivered to the journalists at their homes by federal agents.

The Times condemned the move, calling it an act of intimidation and an attack on press freedom.

“The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects,” Times attorney David McCraw said in a statement.

“Our journalists report the facts and advance the American public’s right to know how their government is operating and their taxpayer dollars are being used,” he continued. “This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs.”

Press advocates also denounced the Justice Department’s (DOJ) actions, saying the move threatens constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment.

“The Justice Department’s decision to subpoena journalists at The New York Times should alarm every American because it threatens the public’s constitutional right to an independent press,” the National Press Club said in a statement, requesting that DOJ withdraw the subpoenas.

The nonprofit organization Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) called the controversy around the Qatari-gifted Boeing 747-8 an “embarrassment” for the Trump administration.

“We’ve long said that when the government claims it needs to investigate journalists to protect national security, it really means its own reputational security,” FPF advocacy chief Seth Stern said in a statement.

“The administration’s embarrassment that it reportedly charged taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit a flying bribe that still isn’t secure enough for hostile times does not supersede the need for a free and independent press,” Stern added.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/polit...-times-journalists-air-force-one-report/

At least they didn't try to claim the problem was created by accusing someone of cutting the wiring of the plane with a knife.
6 443 Read More
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5