Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Solo Musicians bonefish 04/27/24 11:29 AM
IMO Sting is a versatile talented singer song writer who can cross into any genre of music.

44 412 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cleveland Guardians bonefish 04/27/24 11:24 AM
Sale was sailing.

There were many concerns over his health when he was traded for. He has now pitched over 6 innings in each of his starts.

His slider sets up his game. When he pitches like he did last night. good luck.

Today is a new day. I look forward to watching the game.
66 2,192 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Ukraine and Russia Cont. BuckDawg1946 04/27/24 05:38 AM
This is a good thing, I’m glad cooler heads prevailed.

The bigger issue is how the leader of the free world, gave vp not only a pass, the red carpet. This isn’t a hyperbolic synopsis of the American policial system. This should have been easy ethics and morals, from day one.
111 2,504 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Israel at war again. EveDawg 04/27/24 02:14 AM
359 8,543 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: SCOTUS Hears Trump Imunity Case FATE 04/27/24 12:28 AM
But what if they tie with the exact same amount of votes. And MTG declares a duel, they both shoot each other but neither one dies. Then they both claim immunity and decide to be co-presidents. Biden orders the death of all the conservatives in Congress and Trump orders the death of all the libs. And then, and then, and then Kamala cackles so hard that they both are covering their ears, and then they realize her cackle is really a death ray. But there's nothing they can do because once they die she will be president and she will have immunity too!

I can't figure out what would happen after that but it will be very, very scary! Orange Man bad!!
25 271 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Cuckoo Dems-Part 6 EveDawg 04/26/24 10:13 PM


Demented Biden at it again.
28 301 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Republican Cra Cra Again PitDAWG 04/26/24 09:44 PM
rofl

More white noise while saying nothing.
83 1,918 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Goofy Immortal 2 FATE 04/26/24 07:52 PM
When your VR headset starts at $3500...


378 19,383 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: CAVS/NBA leadtheway 04/26/24 07:43 PM
JB and Altman both need to go.. Get someone in here that can build a mentally tough team.. This team just don't have it between the ears and guys like Garland, Niang, and Strus just stealing money
173 9,065 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Political Jokes Pt. 3 MemphisBrownie 04/26/24 07:38 PM
200 3,587 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: The Economy Part 2 PitDAWG 04/26/24 06:33 PM
And that's the how things have become and continue to become. My daughter and son in law moved here to the Nashville area for far better job opportunities and it paid off very well for them. My parents had both passed years earlier so since all my grandkids were moving here my wife an I relocated here as well.

But that isn't how it works for most families. It's crazy to hear the same people say, "Well if you can't find a good job, move the where the jobs are" on one hand and then say, "Let your family help you with childcare" on the other hand.

Then there's the fact that many people simply feel that since their families have their own life it wouldn't be fair to intrude by imposing on them to help raise your children.
37 485 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump hush Money Trial Set to start On April 15th. PerfectSpiral 04/26/24 02:06 PM
I will say, this case is showing what the gullible Americans will believe. The National Enquirer. Pffft morons.
167 3,151 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: WR Rashard Higgins and LB Christian Kirksey to retire as Cleveland Browns Bard Dawg 04/26/24 01:34 PM
Good stuff, Purp! Glad to see them retire as Browns. Solid players and community contributors. Proud to see it. Thanks for all the good.
8 466 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Player News Continued..... Dawgs4Life 04/26/24 11:56 AM
Yeah, it truly seems like the STARS are getting paid and teams kinda just use the draft to plug and replace others
173 7,450 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Who is your "don't sleep on that guy" player? Dawgs4Life 04/26/24 11:45 AM
I liked the rookie CB we drafted last year Cam Mitchell. I think he has some upside
23 851 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Music Video Thread #3471 PitDAWG 04/25/24 09:26 PM
That will give them a crazy amount of exposure! Good for them!
229 6,957 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Cicada Invasion? FATE 04/25/24 07:20 PM
At first I'm like "calling the police??" saywhat 🤣


I never realized there were so many different broods until looking into this about a month ago. They are also very geographical, so it's a "right place/right time" thing, almost like the eclipse.

The great news for me is we booked our large family reunion at a resort in Virginia, in late June, which could be on the edge of some serious chicanery. rofl

Quote
In 2037, Brood VI of the periodical cicadas is expected to emerge in the United States. Brood VI is another one of the 17-year cicadas. There are 15 broods of 17-year periodical cicadas (Magicicada species) in the United States. These broods are designated by Roman numerals and emerge in different years across various regions of the country. Each brood has a distinct geographic range and emergence schedule. Additionally, there are three broods of 13-year periodical cicadas, making a total of 18 broods of periodical cicadas in the United States.

(Two seperate questions I posed to Chat GPT, which saved me 38 hours of scouring Giggle)
1 39 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Abortion issue will be on the Nov. Ballot PitDAWG 04/25/24 06:48 PM
j/c

Arizona House votes to overturn 1864 abortion ban, paving way to leave 15-week limit in place

The Arizona House of Representatives voted Wednesday to overturn the state’s 160-year-old abortion ban, setting the stage for a repeal that would leave the state’s 15-week restriction on the procedure in place.

The vote comes after two failed attempts by lawmakers in the Republican-controlled state House to bring the bill to the floor last week, as Democrats sought to strike down the ban after the state Supreme Court revived it earlier this month.

Three Republicans voted with all 29 Democrats Wednesday to advance the legislation. The state Senate is expected to pass the repeal measure in early May. And Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs is expected to sign the bill if lawmakers advance it to her desk.

“This has been a long time coming,” said Athena Salman, the executive director of Arizona campaigns for Reproductive Freedom for All, formerly NARAL Pro-Choice America.

In its April 9 ruling, the Arizona Supreme Court said that the state must adhere to the 1864 law that bars all abortions except in cases when “necessary” to save a pregnant woman’s life. The law also carries a prison sentence of two to five years for abortion providers.

Wednesday’s vote is a boon to reproductive rights advocates and some Republican candidates, including former President Donald Trump, who have tried to distance themselves from the court ruling.

Within the Arizona House, however, the repeal measure drew angry remarks from several Republicans.

“I am disgusted today,” state Rep. Rachel Jones said. “Life is one of the tenants of our Republican platform. To see people go back on that value is egregious to me.”

Arizona House Speaker Ben Toma, who said he opposes all abortions except to save a pregnant woman’s life, said lawmakers had rushed into repealing the ban.

State Rep. Matt Gress, one of the Republicans who voted with Democrats, said the ban – which was first introduced when Arizona was still a US territory – didn’t reflect the values of most Arizona voters. Repealing it should have been a simple proposition, he said.

“I think it was more difficult than it needed to be,” Gress told CNN.

As the session ended, state House leadership removed Gress from the chamber’s Appropriations Committee, a move that was seen as punishment for bucking the party. Gress said it was “unfortunate and potentially unprecedented,” but he didn’t regret his vote.

“I campaigned against the territorial ban and made it very clear to my voters that I don’t support it,” said Gress, who represents a Phoenix-area district.

Hobbs told CNN’s Abby Phillip Wednesday night she was “relieved” by the repeal’s passage in the state House.

“There have been untold levels of chaos and fear across the state since this Supreme Court decision. So now the Senate needs to vote to send this repeal to my desk, so we can get rid of this 1864 ban once and for all,” the Democratic governor said on “NewsNight.”

If a repeal vote fails in the state Senate, the 1864 law could take effect as early as June 8, making Arizona one of more than a dozen states that bans abortion at virtually all stages of pregnancy with few exceptions.

If it succeeds, Arizona’s 15-week restriction on abortions will continue to be state law. However, officials warned that the territorial ban could be briefly enforceable because nonemergency bills passed in Arizona don’t take effect until 90 days after the Legislature adjourns.

In neighboring California, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom praised a state bill that would allow Arizona medical professionals to perform abortions for Arizona patients in California through the end of the year, arguing that it could help Arizonans even if the 1864 ban is repealed.

“With its urgency clause, SB 233 would fill a critical gap for care during a meaningful period of time before an Arizona repeal could be implemented,” a news release from the governor’s office said. “Swift action helps combat the confusion and chilling effect this back-and-forth creates.”

The Civil War-era abortion ban, which dates to before statehood, was codified in 1901. It remained in effect until 1973, when it was blocked by a court injunction after Roe v. Wade created a federal constitutional right to an abortion.

In March 2022, months before the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Republican Gov. Doug Ducey signed into law the state’s 15-week ban, which has no exceptions for rape or incest. That legislation stated explicitly that it did not overrule the 1864 law.

Democrats have made clear that they still plan to emphasize abortion policy heading into the general election. Arizona Republicans hold one-seat majorities in the state House and Senate, and the state will be a US Senate and presidential battleground this fall.

Sam Paisley, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, which works to elect Democrats to statehouse seats, called Wednesday’s vote a “clear victory for Arizona House Democrats” but pointed out that the 15-week restriction would still exist after a repeal.

“The only way to protect reproductive freedoms is to elect Democrats to the legislature to repeal this (15-week) ban too,” Paisley said in a statement.

Abortion rights advocates are currently working to place a constitutional amendment proposal on the state’s November ballot that would protect abortion access up to fetal viability, which doctors believe is around 22 to 24 weeks of pregnancy. Arizona for Abortion Access, the group backing the amendment, has gathered more than 500,000 signatures. Advocates must submit 384,000 valid signatures by July 3 to make the general election ballot.

Prior to the Arizona House vote, the chamber’s rules committee voted along party lines to approve the late introduction of three House resolutions, largely believed to be Republican-backed ballot measures designed to compete with the abortion rights amendment.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/24/politics/arizona-house-abortion-law/index.html
69 2,337 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Trump starts the Appeals process PitDAWG 04/25/24 06:14 PM
Federal judge upholds verdict in E. Jean Carroll case and denies Trump’s motion for a new trial

A federal judge on Thursday upheld the verdict and award in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case against former President Donald Trump and denied Trump’s motion for a new trial.

Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a written opinion, said Trump’s legal arguments are without merit. The judge also found that the punitive damages the jury awarded to Carroll “passes constitutional muster.”

Carroll, a former magazine columnist, alleged Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman department store in the mid-1990s and then defamed her when he denied her claim. In a separate case, a jury last year found Trump liable for the sexual assault.

The second case stems from remarks Trump had made denying Carroll’s allegations in 2019. He was found liable for defamation last year, and a jury earlier this year ordered him to pay $83.3 million in punitive and compensatory damages.

Trump’s legal team had argued that the damages awarded to Carroll in the defamation case were excessive. Kaplan dismissed that argument in his opinion released Thursday.

“Mr. Trump’s malicious and unceasing attacks on Ms. Carroll were disseminated to more than 100 million people,” Kaplan wrote. “They included public threats and personal attacks, and they endangered Ms. Carroll’s health and safety.”

“The jury,” Kaplan added, “was entitled to conclude that Mr. Trump derailed the career, reputation, and emotional well-being of one of America’s most successful and prominent advice columnists and authors.”

Trump has maintained that he did not sexually assault Carroll, and in 2019, said that Carroll was not his “type.” Those denials formed the basis of the defamation lawsuit.

He sat in court for portions of the defamation trial, earning rebukes from the judge after he was heard making comments during Carroll’s testimony. As Carroll’s lawyers delivered their closing arguments, Trump abruptly and dramatically stood up and left the courtroom.

Kaplan referenced that episode in his opinion: “Mere minutes after (Carroll’s) counsel began her closing argument, Mr. Trump conspicuously stood and walked out of the courtroom for no apparent reason save to evidence his disapproval.”

Aside from the eye-popping monetary amount, the judgment brought another point into stark clarity: A jury of regular citizens – not the politicians or their appointees that Trump constantly claims mistreat him – held him accountable.

The judgment comes as Trump sits in another courtroom – this time, a criminal one – awaiting another jury of regular New Yorkers to decide his fate on charges that he falsified business records to cover up an affair ahead of the 2016 election.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/25/politics/federal-judge-upholds-e-jean-carroll-verdict/index.html
158 2,069 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Spring is coming.. mac 04/25/24 01:48 PM
Here are some of the facts concerning the BG Falcons...
link

2024 Milestones:
First egg laid: April 2, 2:58 p.m.
Second egg laid: April 5, 3:15 a.m.
Third egg laid: April 7, 9:23 a.m.
FOURTH egg laid: April 10, time unknown

The incubated period for Falcons is 29 to 33 days...therefore, we are approx. 1 week from the beginning of the hatching period for the BG falcons.

Today is 'day 23' from the date of the first egg being laid (on Apr. 2nd)...


34 1,410 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: January 6th Fallout Part 8 bonefish 04/25/24 10:59 AM
The only problem is as Mark Twain stated:

"No amount of evidence will ever convince an idiot."

And there are plenty of them.
19 456 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Annie Agar - weekly NFL funnies Frenchy 04/24/24 08:11 PM
28 1,899 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Woman who accused Trevor Bauer of sexual assault indicted for fraud in Arizona PerfectSpiral 04/24/24 02:42 PM
I don’t think Trevor really cares either way. He just broke a Mexican league record. Nine consecutive strike outs.
8 655 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns News Continued.... Milk Man 04/23/24 11:14 PM
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie

London?!? Might end up being Saudi Arabia (pack sunscreen)!



127 8,119 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: OJ Simpson Passes Away FORTBROWNFAN 04/23/24 10:03 PM
Originally Posted by lampdogg
Furhman might have been a racist, even though his fellow LAPD officers - some of them blacks - said he wasn’t, but the blood evidence, the hair and fibre evidence, the lack of anything close to an alibi, the testimony from the limo driver, Simpson being trained how to use a knife - Jesus I could go on and on - should have trumped all of that.
Period.

Good riddance to trash.

I remember a Cincinnati radio show host, not SportsTalk and not Bill C, say that the thing that pretty much convinced him OJ was guilty, was when the police called him at his hotel to tell him hie ex wife was dead. OJ did not even ask what happened. Hie logic being, wouldn't your first question be "OMG, what happened, or something of that ilk? It was almost like he knew the call was coming.

Even if she is your ex, you still have to deal with telling your kids their mother died.
25 769 Read More
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5