Rasheed Walker's one-year deal with the Carolina Panthers, worth up to $10 million (far below the $25 million per season some expected), stems from several performance and market factors.
Performance Weaknesses His elite pass blocking (top-15 in pass block win rate over three years) couldn't offset consistently poor run blocking grades from PFF (44th, 41st, and 53rd overall among tackles recently). This middling overall profile as a former seventh-round pick deterred big offers despite a thin tackle market.
Short-Term Strategy Walker signed a prove-it contract to bet on himself at age 25, aiming for a larger payday in 2027 free agency after replacing injured Ikem Ekwonu. It's a low-risk move for Carolina needing immediate stability without long-term commitment.
Market Dynamics Despite hype as a top available tackle, no bidding war emerged, possibly due to Packers fans' frustration and his unsigned status earlier in free agency. The Panthers capitalized on this for a bargain stopgap.
'Not our war': U.S. allies balk at Trump's Strait of Hormuz demands
Many European governments expressed reservations Monday about providing military support to reopen the crucial waterway.
LONDON — President Donald Trump has berated and threatened America's NATO allies. Now he wants these same countries to help unblock the Strait of Hormuz — and their response has not exactly been enthusiastic.
"This is not our war, we have not started it," German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius told reporters Monday.
That appeared to sum up the mood among U.S. allies, with leaders from Berlin to London expressing reservations about Trump's demands and indicating they had no immediate plans to provide military support to reopen the crucial waterway.
Iran effectively closed the trade route in response to the American-Israeli assault launched last month. This sent global oil prices surging and threatened an international economic shock, something economists had warned about before the war began.
Trump called upon "countries of the world that receive oil through the Hormuz Strait" to "take care of that passage," as he put it in a Sunday post on Truth Social. In an interview with the Financial Times the same day he went further, warning that NATO would have a “very bad future” if its members did not help free up the strait.
Though often wary of risking Trump's ire, many European governments have been reluctant to be pulled into the war with Tehran.
Some, such as the leftist government of Spain, outright refused the Hormuz demand.
"Spain will never accept any stopgap measures" to keep the strait open, Defense Minister Margarita Robles said, "because the objective must be for the war to end, and for it to end now."
Japan and Australia said they had no plans to send ships to aid Trump's request.
Even in Italy, whose Prime Minister Georgia Meloni has previously cast herself as something of a Trump-whisperer, the government declined to get involved.
Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani told reporters that "diplomacy needs to prevail."
Others asked for Trump to provide more information.
Europe needed to understand Trump's “strategic goals. What will be the plan?” Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said.
In Britain, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been criticized by Trump for not taking part in the initial attack on Iran.
Starmer told a news conference Monday he was "working with all of our allies, including our European partners," to "restore the freedom of navigation" as quickly as possible.
"Ultimately, we have to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to ensure stability on the market," he said. "That is not a simple task."
But Starmer made it clear that he would not be drawn into “the wider war,” and that any Hormuz mission should be a broader effort — including the U.S. and Gulf states — rather than something for NATO.
There are other proposals on the table, such as top European diplomat Kaja Kallas on Monday floating a similar deal to the one in 2022 that ensured Ukraine could export grain amid Russia's invasion.
But ultimately, European skepticism over Trump's Hormuz demand seemed to stem from their wariness of the war itself.
"The European answer must be: the way to end the problem is to end the war, not to join it," said Sven Biscop, a director at the Egmont Institute, a Belgian think tank. He said the main thing was "not be intimidated by threats on NATO" by Trump.
Asked for comment on the European reaction, the White House directed NBC News to comments made by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who told reporters that these countries should help out because they "are benefiting greatly from the United States military taking out the threat of Iran."
She added that "the president is absolutely right to call on these countries to do more to help the United States to reopen the Strait of Hormuz so that we can stop this terrorist regime from restricting the free flow of energy."
Despite several ships being bombed as they attempt to cross the strait, Iran denies it has closed the narrow neck of water entirely. After the U.S. and Israel launched the war, it said it would attack vessels from those countries or their allies.
"From our perspective the Strait of Hormuz is open, and only closed to enemies," Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on Telegram.
The wrangle over the strait marks the latest point of tension between the Trump administration and Washington's historic friends across the Atlantic.
Last year, the president refused to rule out using military force to seize the Danish autonomous island of Greenland.
He eventually said in January that he would not deploy the military to take Greenland, which sits in a strategic location amid the melting ice floes frequented by Russia and China, and has a wealth of natural resources.
However the damage had already been done, with officials and expert observers across Europe aghast that their most powerful member — which they fought alongside in World War II — would countenance using force against them.
Other presidents, such as President Barack Obama, have urged NATO members to pay more toward their militaries, and their administrations have been frustrated with Europe's perceived reliance on Washington to take care of its postwar defense.
However, none have done so as publicly or brusquely as Trump.
I watched a re-play of San Fran VS Jacksonville this evening and I focused on our new addition Mr Davis. I came away pretty impressed. He was very disruptive the entire game. He does not play like a guy who weighs 310, very quick and appears to have a legit motor. I believe the game was the 4th of the season. I hope to find a few more re-plays of San Fran to watch to him again. Could be a very good signing, maybe the worm is turning. Go Browns!!
I am not worried about our pitching. We are one of the better staffs in the American League. Our weakness is we are left handed bat heavy. We need more from the right side that can drive the ball on a regular basis.
You allow the super rich to buy media and print-and then they bow down and kiss the ring-see 60 minutes and wapo you replace media coverage in pressers because they don't kiss your ass and actually ask some questions. Sure my pillow media should be in a presidential press conference. in the foreign countries, they are arresting people who film/live stream missile strikes or damage caused by them.
I don't ever watch MS Now other than Morning Joe once in a while and won't watch fox news-I can't stand the our side is always right your always wrong
and for this war-there is much better places to see real coverage- a couple of europe papers Drudge has a bunch of different stuff Al Jazerra Many twitch accounts have live streams of the middle east Tik tok has some but they don't seem to be up for long signancockpit globalsecurity
Why would we draft a QB just to draft one this year? When 2027 is the year to get a guy. After Mendoza there is not another franchise QB! There is no reason to waste an early pick on one, that 2nd first could really help this team, the 2nd round pick could really help this team. Not in favor of wasting a pick this year to develop a guy.
You don't take a QB just to take one, but if there is a guy you like no matter what round you should draft one. We don't know who will be available next year and which QBs will improve next year, going into this year this was considered to be a really good QB draft but guys like Allar, Klubnik, and Nussmeier didn't develop as hoped and guys like Manning, Moore, and Sellers decided to return to school.
Not necessarily. I read a little thing that he's waiting for the market to dry up and specifically for another tackle to get paid, then start responding. That article said $25MM/yr is what he's after minimum. Lots of buyers, few viable tackles. We'll see how it shakes out.
If your doc let's you use the Miralax, by all means do it. The other preps are God awful like the others have said. I had a new doc the last time and I had to do the Go Lytely prep. I actually puked...it was worse than that chemical tasting stuff.
Well according to PFF his run blocking grade was worse than Blake Whiteheart's last year who was our #3 TE. We will be Stoll's 4th team in 6 years this coming season. MEH
I think he means that he will be removed from office but that will never happen. To impeach a president, which pretty much amounts to an accusation only needs a majority vote in order to move forward to the senate. To remove a president from office takes a two thirds majority vote by the senate. That's not going to happen.
I don’t hang out with Mensa intellectuals, so wrong room for me too.