Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Palus Politicus
Re: Mitch McConnell FATE 07/14/26 08:24 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Yes, three times longer makes no difference in trumplandia. Which doesn't make either one of those right.

And remind me again who elected the secretary of defense? Oh that's right, he was appointed and works for the president. Members of the house and senate were elected by the people and work for them, supposedly.

It seems as though you missed a very important part of the premise.

It seems as though you're brain-dead if you want to compare McConnell's absence to the Secretary of Defense. But that's okay, hide behind "one of dem was elected" as if that somehow masks your utter hypocrisy.

"Oh, but, but... one was gone for longer" 🤣
32 649 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Watson vs Sanders? bonefish 07/14/26 06:23 PM
The Baker draft I studied for months.

I watched more tape than I ever have. I remember writing a long breakdown of each guy Darnold, Baker, Allen, Rosen, and Lamar.

I liked the first three. I did not like Rosen or Lamar. Lamar jumped off the tape as an escape artist but I felt he had a long way to go to be a passer in the NFL. Rosen had great throwing mechanics but I felt something was missing with him. I didn't detect a leader.

I remember thinking Allen was a monster who had the best upside. However, I had concerns with him playing hero ball and decision making.

Baker, I liked him. I could see he could spin it and he had pure leadership. His teammates loved him. My concern was his lack of mobility.

Darnold was the guy I wanted to draft. He was excellent throwing on the move. He had a good arm. He was raw and I felt he would need time.

Looking back I wonder where we would be now if we had drafted Allen.

The 27 draft has a bunch of guys. Right now I am going to let the season play out. See who sticks out.
25 539 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Iran War... MoU and forward oobernoober 07/14/26 05:38 PM
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
I was hopeful this would work out but had serious doubts. Iran can't be trusted and they never had any intention to move forward with peace. Nobody can say we didn't try.

As far as I am concerned we should just pound them in to dust. Not all at once, just day by day. See how far we have to twist their arm. One of the positives in all of this is it looks like the rest of the Arab world is sick and tired of Iran and are joining the fight. They want to sell their oil as well.

Sometimes with a cancer you just need to cut it out before you start therapeutic measures.

The fact that you and I (and pretty much anyone else with a shred of common sense) could've predicted this outcome should speak to the performance of the folks on our end that negotiated and agreed to the MoU. It speaks to a lack of clear goals as to what we are working towards.

For me, I think we know what the likelihood of success is in terms of prolonged military conflict in the Middle East. The only thing that has me remotely optimistic is the work going into bypassing Hormuz. There are mentions of pipelines and other oil transport methods so that Hormuz isn't as critical as it is today. This whole debacle has also spurred renewed interest in EVs and other alternative energy sources. I don't want to tangent to beating THAT dead horse, but I do think the country moving in a direction that has us less dependent on oil is a positive that few would argue (definitely arguments to be made regarding the how, though).
50 2,553 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Myles Garrett Traded IrishDawg42 07/14/26 05:14 PM
Originally Posted by bugs
Originally Posted by IrishDawg42
The only thing I disagree with is that Verse needs to be a HOFer for this to be a win. I think it is Verse vs. Myles 2026 on, not comparing what he already did for the Browns. Myles is already HOF worthy, even if he has a career ending injury. What Myles does for the next 5 seasons vs. what Verse does for the next 3 years and hopefully a contract extension beyond that is where I hold the comparison. If the Rams get 5 more HOF seasons our of Garrett and we move on from Verse after two seasons, well, we lost unless we get a lot back from the draft picks. If the two are comparable over the next (3) seasons, it's a wash... if Verse is better OR he is on par along with a hit or two or three on the draft picks, then we win.

ID42, I could not disagree more here. There is no way Verse comes close to matching Myles. There is not a single OC in the league who is specifically scheming protection against Verse, nor are they designing plays to execute in under 3 seconds against Verse. This is the biggest difference between Verse and Garrett.

The best the Browns can hope for is that Verse plays similarly to T. J. Watt in 2025.

In my opinion, for this trade to be considered a wash, the Browns' defense must have similar stats to last year. I think this is doable, but a lot has to change on defense.

My biggest concern without Myles is how the secondary adjusts. It's easy to defend receivers when everything is kept to short routes. If you recall, Campbell was a liability for Jacksonville on deep routes. My second concern is the linebackers. What happens to Schwesinger when offenses no longer need to slide protection over to cover Myles? Who is covering the TEs now that they are not double-teaming Myles? Who is our slot corner? Another concern, who are the starting corners if Ward and/or Campbell goes down for the season? Garrett neutralized these weaknesses.

If the Browns' front defensive four can't maintain the same pressure they had with Garrett, it's going to be a long season. Right now, the offense hasn't shown they are capable of doing anything better than last year. Yes, they improved the OL, but we all have seen Cleveland have a great OL with poor QB play.


I don't think we disagree as much as you think. I don't automatically think Verse will be as good as Myles, and I didn't intend for it to sound that way.

At 30, how much longer do you think Myles is going to be the elite guy that teams have to change their entire defense for one week? That's why I said comparing the two from this point forward.

I love Myles to death and appreciate everything he brought to the Browns. He is now traveling more and more and spending a lot a time away from training with his girlfriend. That holds up when you are 25 and as special as Myles is. If he doesn't keep up with his off season workouts, I could see a world where Myles becomes human. Myles has averaged 13.9 sacks per year. I guess my question is, do you expect him to average that over the next 5 seasons, which is the remainder of his contract?

These next 5 years are what Verse needs to be judged by...

Also, for the trade to be a wash, the Browns don't have to have similar stats. If the Browns defense has similar stats then the Browns win because they kept the same defensive stats AND have a first round pick in 2027 along with a second round pick in 2028. Those players would push this past a wash if the defensive stats stay status quo.

To take that a step further though, are you comparing the Browns collectively over Garrett's career or just 2025? Because the Browns defense was never as good as 2025 and Garrett has been here for 9 years. If the Browns take a step back, it could just as easily be contributed to Schwartz. We don't know what we have for a coaching staff in 2026. Could Myles be the ONLY catalyst to a great defense? I don't really think so. I think there are other young players that will keep this defense in the top ten for the foreseeable future.

The secondary is in a better place than it was last year with the addition of EMW. HE is who they will expect to defend those TEs you are talking about. It's what he excels at and was built for. As for time to throw, the Browns defense averaged 2.7-2.8 seconds to throw against in 2025. The Rams defense averaged 2.8-2.9 and Verse was one of the main reasons for that. We aren't talking about systems where the gap is 2.4 seconds to 3.4 seconds.

I re-iterate, a lot will depend on the D that Mike Rutenberg comes up with. There were 31 other teams without Myles Garrett. The Browns can continue to play at a high level depending on Mike's scheme and play calling.

The offense has nothing to do with the Myles Garrett trade unless one of those draft picks go on that side of the ball. Them being bad in 2026 isn't a direct reflection of the Myles trade. If the Browns lose a big step on defense and the two picks go to the offense, especially the QB AND THEY STILL are a bad offense... Then this trade will be a bust.


If the Browns use the Rams two picks to move into the top ten after winning 9 games in 2026, get their QB and he becomes a franchise guy, the Browns automatically win.

All I am saying is, the Browns have more ways to win this trade than lose it, they are a 5 win team with Myles playing the best season of his career. The Rams need to go to the Super Bowl or the trade is a bust for them.
191 13,435 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Trump will Keep Jet Qutar Gifted the U.S. For Presidential Library PitDAWG 07/14/26 04:47 PM
New Air Force One Lacks Defensive Countermeasures of Previous Model, Officials Say

Experts said the lack of such capabilities poses a potential risk when the president travels overseas. The White House defended the aircraft’s safety.

The new Air Force One, which President Trump flew on earlier this week to Turkey, lacks the same defensive countermeasures that were security features of the old model, including its advanced antimissile capabilities, according to multiple officials who have been briefed on how the jet was retrofitted.

Experts say the absence of those capabilities on the Boeing 747-8 aircraft, which was donated by Qatar, creates potential risk in using the jet abroad, a dynamic underscored by the abrupt decision on Wednesday for Mr. Trump to leave Turkey on the old Air Force One at the urging of the Secret Service.

The episode is intensifying the focus on Mr. Trump’s demands to rapidly retrofit the donated 747 to replace an aging fleet that had served as the official presidential planes.

Lawmakers have called on the administration to disclose whether the overhaul of the Qatari plane, which the Air Force oversaw in the course of the last year, provided sufficient security upgrades. The safety of the aircraft is critical not only for the president, but also for the large entourage of White House staff, Secret Service officials, journalists and guests who fly aboard.

Mr. Trump pushed for the new plane to be put into use as quickly as possible and frequently complained that the old presidential aircraft was not impressive enough to take on international trips.

On Thursday, the White House did not address specific questions about the new plane’s capabilities, but defended its safety.

“The new Air Force One is a state-of-the-art aircraft that has been fitted with high-level security protocols that ensure the safety of the president and his staff,” Steven Cheung, the communications director, said in a statement. “As the president has said recently, there are many enemies of America who have their sights on him, and we use every tool at our disposal to address those threats.”

The Air Force has declined to discuss specifics around security systems on the retrofitted Qatari plane, which is being used as a “bridge” aircraft while two Boeing jets that will be part of the permanent presidential fleet are being finished.

But in a statement it made when it announced that the donated jet was ready to transport the president, it acknowledged that the temporary plane did not have all the equipment usually found on an Air Force One.

“No risk was taken in security, safety or mission communications,” the Air Force said in a statement on June 19. “But the collective team made trades on some of the less commonly used mission sets that Boeing must deliver to support the next 40 years.”

The Air Force would not say what it meant by “less commonly used mission sets.”

However, officials who have been briefed on the retrofitting of the Qatari jet, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe its security features, said it did not have the same counter-defensive capabilities of the previous model.

Two former Air Force officials, who had both been involved in the effort to replace the older Air Force One planes, said they were surprised to see Mr. Trump fly on the new jet overseas, where there are greater security risks. Turkey, where Mr. Trump attended a NATO summit, borders Iran, which the United States pummeled with renewed strikes this week.

The former officials were not involved with the retrofitting of the Qatari jet, but said the speed of the project meant there would not have been enough time to make all of the security modifications that are traditionally associated with a fully equipped presidential aircraft.

“Time didn’t permit all the normal Air Force One modifications, so some mix of security, communications and support is missing,” said Frank Kendall, the former Air Force secretary who was in charge of the department as it tried to push Boeing to accelerate its long-delayed contract to deliver two new Air Force One planes.

“With the Iran situation, this could be of concern,” Mr. Kendall said. “Frankly, I’m surprised to see this plane used outside the U.S.”

Andrew P. Hunter, the former Air Force assistant secretary who was in charge of the Air Force One program during the Biden administration, also said that a true retrofit of a 747 jet to prepare it to become Air Force One would require more than a year of work.

The day before Mr. Trump left for Turkey, Senate Democrats wrote to the Air Force asking questions about the modifications to the Qatari plane and questioning whether it had all the necessary security upgrades.

“Trump’s own statements — including his celebration of ‘a level of luxury that nobody’s ever seen before’ — make it clear that these decisions prioritized Trump’s personal comfort and tastes over U.S. national security,” they wrote in the letter sent by Senator Christopher S. Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, and 12 other senators.

The older planes that served as Air Force One included a defensive system designed to defeat heat-seeking missiles. That capacity is also planned to be included in the new Boeing planes, according to three former Pentagon officials.

Different parts of the defensive systems are visible on the old Air Force One, under the wing of the plane and on its tail. They are not observable in photographs of the new Qatari plane, according to a third former Air Force official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the security protocols.

Missile defense systems on Air Force One have seen little use in the history of the aircraft, but have nevertheless been considered critical aspects of the plane’s security features.

The Pentagon published specifications for the Boeing aircraft now under construction that indicate the new jets will include a “self-defense system” and “mission communication system,” as these and other upgrades are needed “to enable the president to execute the duties of head of state, chief executive, and commander in chief.”

U.S. officials have said that Iran has been targeting Mr. Trump since he ordered the drone strike that killed Qassim Suleimani, in January 2020. During the 2024 campaign, the Secret Service increased protection for Mr. Trump, even before the attempt on his life in Butler, Pa., because of intelligence about Iran’s plotting against him.

Despite the resumption of intense U.S. strikes on Iran, American policymakers briefed on the current intelligence do not believe that Iran has a current plan to kill Mr. Trump during this period. A U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe intelligence assessments, said that Iran had a clear understanding of what kind of deep provocation any attempt on Mr. Trump’s life would be and the intensity of an American response.

Nevertheless, the Secret Service was concerned enough about Mr. Trump’s proximity to the country while in Ankara to force the president to swap planes on the way out of the country, as The New York Times first reported Wednesday.

In announcing the change, Mr. Trump offered a different story: He claimed that he was flying out on the old plane so the new jet could leave early and make stops at U.S. military bases to show it off to the troops because the aircraft is “magnificent.”

One former senior White House official involved in discussions about military aircraft used for presidential travel said that there were frequently points of tension between White House staff and the military advisers and Secret Service over travel plans when security questions emerged.

But when the military experts demanded changes, White House officials generally let them prevail, with “course of action” plans that mitigated potential threats.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/09/us/politics/new-air-force-one-defensive-countermeasures.html

And in response to the NYT exposing their incompetence.........................

DOJ subpoenas NYT journalists over Air Force One report

The Trump administration hit four New York Times journalists with subpoenas on Friday, after the outlet published a story outlining risks involving President Trump’s Qatar-gifted Air Force One plane that recently entered into service.

The Times reported that the refurbished jet lacked some of the advanced security measures of the older aircraft used to transport the president.

The reporters include Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager and Eric Schmitt. They also wrote earlier this week that a security precaution forced Trump to depart to the NATO summit in Turkey on the old Air Force One, were called to testify next week before a federal grand jury in Manhattan “in regard to an alleged violation of federal criminal law.” The switch-up also raised red flags around potential threats against the president from Iran after the U.S. launched fresh strikes on the Islamic Republic earlier this week.

The outlet noted that before publication, a senior FBI official contacted it requesting to halt the article for national security reasons but declined to provide details. The subpoenas were reportedly delivered to the journalists at their homes by federal agents.

The Times condemned the move, calling it an act of intimidation and an attack on press freedom.

“The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects,” Times attorney David McCraw said in a statement.

“Our journalists report the facts and advance the American public’s right to know how their government is operating and their taxpayer dollars are being used,” he continued. “This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs.”

Press advocates also denounced the Justice Department’s (DOJ) actions, saying the move threatens constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment.

“The Justice Department’s decision to subpoena journalists at The New York Times should alarm every American because it threatens the public’s constitutional right to an independent press,” the National Press Club said in a statement, requesting that DOJ withdraw the subpoenas.

The nonprofit organization Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) called the controversy around the Qatari-gifted Boeing 747-8 an “embarrassment” for the Trump administration.

“We’ve long said that when the government claims it needs to investigate journalists to protect national security, it really means its own reputational security,” FPF advocacy chief Seth Stern said in a statement.

“The administration’s embarrassment that it reportedly charged taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit a flying bribe that still isn’t secure enough for hostile times does not supersede the need for a free and independent press,” Stern added.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/polit...-times-journalists-air-force-one-report/

At least they didn't try to claim the problem was created by accusing someone of cutting the wiring of the plane with a knife.
6 407 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 PitDAWG 07/13/26 07:07 PM
rofl
185 10,993 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Fun with ai BADdog 07/13/26 06:19 PM
https://app.runwayml.com/creation/9aa746a4-1fe8-4c3d-9449-6ebbfb895f63

BOOGIE DOWN

I am just sharing having fun. Do these links work? these are our dogs
16 1,109 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cavs/NBA 3.0 Bard Dawg 07/13/26 04:09 PM
I will watch Cavs, especially if LBJ returns and they hold court. Looking for official word.
6 633 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Random NFL News PitDAWG 07/12/26 05:36 PM
Seahawks to be sold for NFL-record $9.6 billion: Who bought the team, and why billions will go to charity

The historic price tag smashes the previous NFL record set just three years ago

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/seahawks-sold-9-6-billion-nfl-record-buyer-owners/
69 7,349 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Senator Lindsey Graham dies suddenly at the age of 71 PitDAWG 07/12/26 03:32 PM
From staunch critic to fierce ally: Graham’s long, strange and consequential friendship with Trump

WASHINGTON (AP) — After the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, Sen. Lindsey Graham said he had finally had enough of the man who was championed by the mob that stormed the pillar of American democracy: President Donald Trump.

“Trump and I, we’ve had a hell of a journey. I hate it to end this way. Oh my God, I hate it. From my point of view, he’s been a consequential president,” an emotional Graham said once authorities cleared the rioters and allowed senators to reclaim their chamber. “All I can say is count me out. Enough is enough.”

It wasn’t, of course.

Graham, the South Carolina Republican who died unexpectedly on Saturday night at age 71, realized that his party’s future was inextricably tied to Trump and quickly reverted back to being a staunch defender. The shift made what had once seemed like a final rupture into just another twist in the topsy-turvy relationship between the powerful senator and the president who came to dominate their party.

“Can we move forward without President Trump? The answer is no,” Graham said in May 2021, just four months after the Jan. 6 attack. “I’ve determined we can’t grow without him.”

Trump, who called Graham a “true American Patriot” in a social media post Sunday, appeared shocked by the lawmaker’s sudden passing.

“I just can’t believe it,” the president told NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “He was like a member of the family.”

Graham often advised Trump on foreign affairs, particularly on matters pertaining to Israel, Ukraine and Iran. He was a frequent visitor at the White House.

“I said, ‘We’ll see you soon, come over anytime you want,’” Trump said about his last conversation with the senator.
Graham once said Trump’s candidacy was like ‘being shot in the head’

The senator and Trump first clashed while competing for the 2016 presidential nomination.

Graham described Trump as “unfit for office,” and was angered when Trump denigrated the military service of Graham’s close friend, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. Trump suggested, “I like people that weren’t captured” when talking about McCain’s years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam.

Trump got mad enough at Graham to release the senator’s personal cellphone number. That prompted a viral video in which the senator dramatically destroyed a series of flip phones. He smashed one with a meat cleaver and another with a golf club, then used lighter fluid, a blender and toaster oven to pulverize others before tossing one off the roof.

Graham eventually likened Trump’s winning the nomination to “being shot in the head” and said he refused to vote for Trump that November. But the pair later bonded over golf and what Graham described as a mutual and irreverent sense of humor.

Trump and Graham began so frequently hitting the links together that the senator started seeing it as something of a career builder, leaning heavily into the kind of over-the-top flattery Trump relishes. In 2017, Graham joked that Trump had beaten him “like a drum” on the course — even worse than in the presidential primary.

“Their true friendship could only be seen behind the curtain,” Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., told ABC’s “This Week.” Scott said that relationship was forged as political adversaries but also strengthened by spending 100-plus hours golfing together.

During Trump’s first term, Graham helped advance Trump’s nominees to the Supreme Court, lent credibility to the White House’s legislative agenda and even at times became part of the president’s inner circle. He frequently said Trump was maturing in politics and growing on the job.

Graham’s political divergence with McCain, who died in 2018, was never more clear than in 2017, when McCain voted against a Trump-backed plan to overturn Democratic President Barack Obama’s signature health care law. The effort had been co-sponsored by Graham.

A split that was short-lived, an alliance reignited

In his floor speech after the Capitol attack, Graham said “he’d never been so humiliated and embarrassed for the country.” But the break with Trump ended quickly.

Weeks later, Trump invited Graham for golf and dinner at the president’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, reigniting their alliance. During Trump’s 2024 campaign, Graham was a frequent Trump surrogate on television, promoting U.S. military strength that he said would advance “America First” policies.

Graham never shed his more traditional Republican foreign policy views, including outspoken support for Ukraine during the Russian invasion. He was also a leading voice pushing the White House to more fully embrace Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and take a harder line against Iran.

After the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran in February, Graham remained hawkish, staunchly defending the action and working to counter many in Trump’s “Make America Great Again” base who thought “America First” meant avoiding such military conflicts.

“To those who say Iran is stronger now than before, that is an insult to the American military and it is delusional thinking because the Iranian economy is in shambles,” Graham posted on social media June 19.

But Graham’s admiration for Trump went far beyond Iran. When Graham clinched the South Carolina Republican primary last month, he suggested the president was just short of a deity.

“I want to start with a bunch of thank yous. I want to thank the big guy, God. Trump comes later,” Graham laughed. “Mr. President, you’re not far behind God, but we’re gonna start with him.”

https://apnews.com/article/trump-gr...y-iran-abce65fdea00e13e34b8cb6380b4f8c9?
4 125 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Bonnie Tyler Eclipsed at 75 Ballpeen 07/12/26 11:02 AM
Originally Posted by JPPT1974
Her song was very popular when the eclipse thing happened in April 2024. 75 Is very young to pass away!! RIP!

I wouldn't call 75 very young.
6 199 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: The World Cup mgh888 07/12/26 08:03 AM
The final 4 are set:

France vs Spain.

France have looked the best team of the competition. They are stacked with talent and play attractive football.
Spain have tons of talent and are highly organized but play a possession based (boring) style of football. It will be an interesting match up - I think both teams have about an equal amount of talent. France are more explosive but Spain may foil them and frustrate them ... an early goal for France would probably help make it a more exciting game.

England vs Argentina.

England played their best game vs Mexico then looked a little flat vs Norway and could be considered fortunate to have won. Argentina have played well and they have Messi - they have also been outrageously fortunate with the officiating and in all honesty deserved to lose to Egypt without the officiating benefitting them significantly. Expect a close game with momentum swinging one way then the other.
25 1,722 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: House GOP Targets Senate Power in Capitol Hill Constitutional Feud mgh888 07/12/26 07:50 AM
See - this to me needs to be put into context.

These are elected officials - in power and pushing an agenda that proposes and wants to rip up something fundamentally American, part of the constitution and in place for 114 years.

There's much noise about the Democratic Socialist Party on this board - it appears like it might be a rebranding of a non-influential group formerly calling themselves the Socialist Party. I see online something about the DSA having just surpasses 100,000 members ... whoop da freaking loop.

This is essentially a microcosm of so much of the politics today ... something big like Project 2025 is being enacted. We're in war with Iran that is killing the economy, has essentially made Iran more influential because they know how much they can hurt the USA/Trump/the world by closing the straits of Hurmuz. We have the DOJ being used to go openly after political opponents with evidence being manipulated to Grand Juries while 10,000 lawyers depart the DoJ (presumably/possibly/probably in part because of what they see). We have an administration trying to upend Birth Right Citizenship, another part of the constitution. We have a PoTUS shilling and making Billions because of his position while simultaneous actively undermining the principal of the separation of powers and checks and balances withing the 3 branches of Govt .......... And in response the narrative from the likes of Bannon, Trump and the very influential right wing media is deflection and distraction about a "movement" with about 100,000 members. We get a focus on Trans individuals that represent a tiny % of the population overall, and then if you look at the number of Trans "issues" where contentious event has happened - the numbers are absolutely minute. We get "condoms for Hamas" and Russian lies that get spammed and spread through fake SM accounts and picked up and embraced by MAGA.

And I don't see it changing any time soon.
1 84 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Thor YTownBrownsFan 07/12/26 12:39 AM
Kinda funny, and not in the same league, but the Guardians just drafted a 17 year old pitcher who is 6'4" and IIRC, 220#. At 17.
8 198 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? oobernoober 07/10/26 08:39 PM
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Maybe I should've posted an article that was more on-the-nose.

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/markets/trump-stock-trades-before-tariff-pause-rcna352723


He made 300+ trades the day before he paused tariffs. That is the very opposite of "blind" wealth.

this article is behind a paywall.

Third times a charm....

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/02/trump-aapl-nvda-tariffs-disclosures.html
389 37,435 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Goofy Immortal Part Deux 3rd_and_20 07/10/26 07:03 PM
LeBron James Realizes He Left Brand-New Stick Of Deodorant In Lakers Locker

https://theonion.com/lebron-james-realizes-he-left-brand-new-stick-of-deodorant-in-lakers-locker/

rofl
109 17,979 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Democratic Socialist Party Releases New Platform PitDAWG 07/10/26 06:05 PM
One side already has already taken over the stats quo with Project 2025. What we're beginning to see now is the backlash.

I would love to see moderates take over control of both parties so some sense of compromise could be reached to move the nation forward. The question now is what does the word moderate even mean in politics anymore? Sadly as of now I think it will be a long time to come before that happens. I see every American having healthcare as a moderate position but many say it's not.

I know everyone doesn't share my opinion but it seems any time there is legislation proposed that would help every day Americans a negative stereotype gets attached to it.

Meanwhile The White House endorses a privately owned chain of gas station that nobody seems to know who owns them and nothing is said...........

“The FIRST Freedom Fuel Network gas station has LANDED in Philadelphia, lowering the price at the pump to $3.47 for our 47th President,” the White House wrote on the social platform X on Tuesday.

As you have shown trump buys stocks and then endorses products to boost their stock value to enrich himself. He buys stocks right before he rolls back sanctions on them to increase his wealth and those same people never say a word about it and even try to defend it.
11 251 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Somalians PitDAWG 07/10/26 02:37 PM
rofl

And one of them is back posting in this forum again.
144 9,833 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: The Dems... again PerfectSpiral 07/09/26 08:52 PM
I’m betting the dems won’t dance on Mitch’s grave like MAGA did on RBG’s
282 16,346 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: DOJ charges Southern Poverty Law Center with fraud over secret funding of extremist groups PerfectSpiral 07/09/26 08:47 PM
Originally Posted by FATE
Originally Posted by PerfectSpiral
Originally Posted by Day of the Dawg
Originally Posted by FATE
Originally Posted by Day of the Dawg
The SPLC pays for the hate to get keep themselves relevant. What a joke and anyone who follows them are a joke.

Some people still think all 42,319 instances of payouts and corruption are all so they can "keep their ears to the ground". Some people aren't really that smart though.

They (Democrats) started the hate groups they might as well fund them even though they use their existence to stay relevant.

I love it when MAGAts search for dignity in their own dumpster.

We love it when Oscar the Grouch pops his head out of the garbage can once a month with more worthless commentary.

We? I guess that’s that. There must be a bunch of MAGAts here with you. Can we get a head count?
38 1,846 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Browns News cont. PitDAWG 07/09/26 02:02 PM
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
Our other resident "I like to pick fights & twist people's words" was also routinely propping this nonsense up.

When did you do that? rolleyes
86 6,896 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: More Music 3rd_and_20 07/08/26 09:22 PM
196 16,745 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: White House report brands Smithsonian leadership as radical activists who can’t be trusted mgh888 07/07/26 09:18 PM
We don't want communists running these institutions. It's a good job King Trump will remove them. They should count themselves lucky if they are allowed to stay in the county5
1 105 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s proposed limits Bard Dawg 07/06/26 06:30 PM
-=SMH=- So tired of winning. . . .

Rough week, neh?
12 601 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Happy 250th Independence Day oobernoober 07/06/26 11:21 AM
There are a couple households in my neighborhood that are explosives enthusiasts and ply their trade most major holidays.

There was a pretty good storm that came through during peak fireworks hours. I swear the moment the last raindrop hit the ground they were already lighting fuses again.
6 287 Read More
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5