Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Palus Politicus
Re: The Dems... again Ballpeen 07/28/26 12:47 PM
Originally Posted by mgh888
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by mgh888
Originally Posted by mgh888
I think we could move further left and copy some of the European countries who are WAY left of the USA and who are always ranking highly on quality of life, education etc.

To add - like some countries in Europe: further left of anything like the Democrats ... And none of them communist.

And European countries are turning in to 2nd fiddle nations. If that is the green grass for you, stay there.

You'll have to supply some metrics or data to support that wild and emotional based response.

Far from wild an emotional. Here is one with the broad outlook.

https://www.eureporter.co/politics/future-of-europe/2026/01/08/the-four-horsemen-of-europes-decline/
337 18,981 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Camp Questions WSU Willie 07/28/26 12:47 PM
Originally Posted by bonefish
There are other ways to look at that.

Baker dug his own hole. He was not the same guy you see now. He needed to have what happened to him.

DW stunk. He has been a shell of what he once was. He came in with heavy baggage. Mentally a mess. He got injured and never recovered.


Well...Baker was not responsible for the revolving doors of HCs and OCs he was saddled with (not to mention the WRs and some guy named Blake at LT)...IOW what he may have become in Cleveland if he had a guy like Sean McDermott (Josh Allen) or John Harbaugh (Lamar Jackson) as his HC and with the consistency those guys created. He got the opposite of consistency yet did pretty damn well with it.

It's quite reasonable to say how Baker may have flourished with the Bills or Ravens. It's also hilarious when I read how we should have drafted Allen. Allen was a little raw and quite inconsistent as a Rookie...imagine that with Hue and then Freddie.
17 477 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: More Music bbrowns32 07/28/26 02:34 AM
It sure ain't 'fancy' but it caught my attention...

203 17,496 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Trump will speak on elections in primetime address after pushing debunked conspiracies superbowldogg 07/28/26 12:07 AM
Originally Posted by Damanshot
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by oobernoober
For the cost part, there are programs to mitigate or defer the financial cost of getting a license or state ID.

I wish people would quit making the affordability claim. Anybody who wants an ID can afford to get one. They cost maybe $20 and are good for a number of years.

It's a stupid argument. Civic responsibility is real. As long as some states allow voting without ID, their election results should and will always be questioned. People who think that no ID required is a good thing have no problem with rigged election results.

I agree with you, but I think there's still work to be done. IMO, it should be relatively painless for someone that should have a state/federal ID to get a state/federal ID. That's pie-in-the-sky type stuff, but it should be what the relevant agencies should be working towards.

But you are right (IMO). Civic responsibility should outweigh personal inconvenience.

I have no problem with that, nor making them really inexpensive if not free.

I have one of those Drivers Licenses that have the star on it. I had to show my Birth Certificate and some other items to Verify who I am.

The Birth Cert I showed had the stamp on it... It was an Original.


Did you know that that is not an acceptable form of ID for the Save Act?

I'm convinced that the Save Act is nothing more than a way to suppress the vote. I thought that was illegal!



The SAVE America Act defines acceptable forms of documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for federal elections as:

Real IDs indicating that the applicant is a U.S. citizen
Valid (unexpired) U.S. passports
Military identification cards along with service records indicating place of birth in the U.S.

A valid government-issued photo ID presented together with one of the following documents:

a certified birth certificate
a Record of Birth extract
an adoption decree showing a U.S. place of birth
a Consular Report of Birth Abroad
a Naturalization Certificate or Certificate of Citizenship

an American Indian Card with the classification “KIC”
Many of these documents are relatively uncommon in the general population. For example, only five states issue Real IDs that indicate U.S. citizenship.

As a result, most Americans who would need to provide documentary proof are likely to rely on one of two common pathways: an unexpired U.S. passport or a government-issued photo ID paired with a birth certificate.
https://bipartisanpolicy.org/article/five-things-to-know-about-the-save-act/
89 2,729 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Myles Garrett Traded superbowldogg 07/27/26 11:59 PM
If the defense regresses, it will not be because of Myles. It will because of the loos of Schwartz.

Myles is amazing and so was Bruce Smith.

Bruce Smith Never won a Super Bowl. Smith's impact on the game unheard of and it wasn't enough.

Bottom line...
DE don't win Super bowls

Quarterbacks, WR's, RB's, DB's, and LB's and do.
257 16,810 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Random NFL News Pdawg 07/27/26 11:05 PM
74 7,733 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Fun with ai bonefish 07/27/26 09:44 PM
My daughter just received a PhD.

Her dissertation was on large scale AI integration and scalable AI integration.

She built her own AI to handle her intellectual property at UGA.

I have begun messing around with it and it blows my mind. I feel like I am living the future.

I came from when people sold encyclopedias door to door.
23 1,486 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Iran War... MoU and forward MemphisBrownie 07/27/26 07:15 PM
65 3,341 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Robert Duvall bonefish 07/27/26 07:12 PM
IMO he was one of the truly great actors.

Even when he had small roles like in Sling Blade. He made a mark.

He had a way to capture the essence of the role.

Tender Mercies was an incredible movie. It was like watching real life. The ability to be natural is what great actors do.

14 896 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Watson vs Sanders? hitt 07/27/26 11:47 AM
People in journalism?/media?/ politics- do/say anything to get clicks, be the story, get some coverage/MONEY--- Watson or Sanders- I don't "LIKE" either one of them- "tainted character" vs "showboat/ glamour guy", neither appeal to me. I hope we play the guy who gives us the best chance to WIN.

Watson ain't old- he could have YEARS to go as a player if he gets in right system again....or they play to his strengths......GO Browns!!!
34 1,443 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Many Australians Can Now Get 3 Free Hours of Electricity Per Day Ballpeen 07/27/26 11:11 AM
Great, they get free power from free solar panels.

It sounds like an effort to lower the high demand period when people come home from work and turn on lights and air conditioners. If it works and lessens the strain on the system great, though I still say it isn't "free".
7 184 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cleveland Guardians 2.0 waterdawg 07/26/26 07:00 PM
What an embarrassment this team is at the plate .. Poor pitching staff ,,, And what is the deal with the Teams MLB site ? Needs refreshedf big time
178 18,182 Read More
Palus Politicus
Communism or Socialism PitDAWG 07/26/26 06:18 PM
What do you call it when the trump administration takes taxpayer money and invests roughly $26.7 billion across 30 equity or quasi-equity deals with private companies and corporations?

The U.S. government invested $27 billion in corporate stakes. Good luck finding them

The Trump administration has invested roughly $26.7 billion across 30 equity or quasi-equity deals, headlined by a 9.9% stake in chipmaker Intel that's now worth $42 billion.

Others include $400 million into rare-earth miner MP Materials to loosen China's grip on magnet supply chains, the "golden share" in U.S. Steel retained as a condition of its sale to Japan's Nippon Steel, or the flurry of stakes in quantum computing firms.

But with all that dealmaking, those wary of government's corruptive tendencies—and of President Donald Trump's own trading—might want to see some transparency. The portfolio, however, is nowhere to be found.

There is no consolidated ledger of the government's holdings; the stakes sit scattered across at least four agencies: 17 deals through Commerce, seven through Defense, six through the Development Finance Corporation, two through Energy. Only one of those, the Development Finance Corporation, has clear statutory authority to own equity at all, under a framework Congress built in 2018 for development deals abroad.

The White House did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. A Treasury spokesperson said agencies report equity interests "in different ways" depending on the legal authority behind each stake.

Some of the "stakes" are signed agreements, while others, including nine quantum computing deals Commerce announced in a single week, remain more ambiguous, closer to term sheets. The most complete public accounting of Washington's portfolio is kept by the Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank.

"The deals that have been announced to date are only the tip of the iceberg," Jonathan Hillman, the Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow who maintains that tracker, told Fortune, "and the real test will be whether Washington can build a system to effectively manage its growing portfolio of investments over the long run."

The best-documented stake in the portfolio is the biggest one. Intel's August 2025 securities filings name the shareholder: the United States Department of Commerce, counterparty to a "Warrant and Common Stock Agreement" covering 433.3 million shares at $20.47 apiece. It's a passive stake, with no board seat or information rights, and the government has agreed to vote with Intel's board on most matters.

Yet some aspects of the deal, in the filings, look strange. Roughly two-thirds of the shares were delivered to Commerce when the deal closed; the rest sit in escrow to be released as Intel hits milestones under a Pentagon chip program, meaning a slice of the government's marquee holding is not yet in the government's hands. The claw-back and profit-sharing provisions attached to Intel's earlier $2.2 billion CHIPS Act grant were also eliminated. Grants have strings that these stocks don't.

In addition, ethics filings revealed that accounts held in the president's own name began buying Intel in March, months after his administration's stake sent the stock soaring. No insider trading has been alleged, and the White House says his assets sit in a trust managed by his children; but Trump's personal holdings are unprecedented for the modern presidency.

For the government's stakes in private companies—such as Vulcan Elements, xLight, and others—no public securities filings with the SEC exist at all.

Even where the shares can be found, the money is tricky to follow. Federal budget rules, mostly designed for grants and loans, treat an equity purchase as an outlay—money out the door—with very little mechanism for recognizing what comes back, according to research by William Henagan, a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. That means the Intel position's rise from $8.9 billion to $42 billion appears in no budget document.

The Development Finance Corporation, established by Congress in 2018 to make equity investments abroad, is one exception. But the framework has a narrow lens: it was designed for financing ports in developing countries. Yet now it is the closest thing Washington has to a legal template for owning chipmakers.

A DFC spokesperson told Fortune it records its equity postions as investment assets and manages the ownership on a case-by-case basis.

The federal government has held corporate equity at scale once before, and it did so under supervision. The Troubled Asset Relief Program, the $700 billion rescue fund Congress created in October 2008 at the height of the financial crisis, came with a statutory special inspector general who filed quarterly reports to Congress, plus a congressional oversight panel and standing GAO audits to boot.

But even that apparatus was judged insufficient: in 2009, the program's own inspector general told Congress that taxpayers weren't being told what recipients were doing with their money.

Today's sprawling portfolio has none of that. The administration, for its part, has never claimed otherwise; it has hinted the stakes are the start of something bigger.

"It's like a down payment on a sovereign wealth fund, which many countries have," Kevin Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC after the Intel deal was announced.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/u-government-invested-27-billion-120000768.html
0 33 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 PitDAWG 07/26/26 04:16 PM
Today president Donald Trump announced that he had appointed Captain Jack Sparrow to be in charge of re-opening the Strait of Hormuz.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth could not be reached for comment.

naughtydevil
193 11,447 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: 25TH Amendment discussion PitDAWG 07/26/26 02:03 PM
At least the Democrats were smart enough not to run him for re-election. rofl
4 143 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Federal judge says Trump administration must restore disaster money to Democratic states PitDAWG 07/26/26 02:02 PM
This was obvious all along but it's still quite surprising they would openly admit it. Which begs to question....

Quote
The Trump administration is coming clean now, it said, because it wanted to avoid the government having to participate in the discovery process for the lawsuit.

............... if they are willing to openly admit to this, what in the hell are they trying to hide in the discovery process?
8 288 Read More
Everything Else... Jump to new posts
Re: Goofy Immortal Part Deux Clemdawg 07/26/26 03:53 AM
I got to admit.. I laughed out loud at this one.
112 18,503 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: What If? IrishDawg42 07/25/26 05:16 PM
Money money money money… money


I don’t think he has cared to this point, but now he’s playing for a contract. My hope is that his arm remains sore, he is limited in training camp and Monken sets him aside.

Let’s get ready for the season with Shedeur and see what happens.
230 17,328 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Mitch McConnell PitDAWG 07/25/26 04:17 PM
Day 41 of McConnell still missing.....................

"But what about that ten days that one time?"
36 1,195 Read More
Tailgate Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Cavs/NBA 3.0 Bard Dawg 07/25/26 02:39 PM
Good riddance then. More of the same games he played before e when he left us. Thanks for the ring. LeBron is Frodo: He keeps disappearing. fan up, y'all.
14 1,129 Read More
Pure Football Forum
Re: Browns News cont. oobernoober 07/24/26 01:04 PM
It's being reported that Judkins is officially a "full-go" for Training Camp.

Remembering back to the game where he went down with the knee/leg, this is absolutely phenomenal.
88 7,504 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? PitDAWG 07/21/26 03:44 PM
Tate brothers' lawyer calls for Trump to block UK extradition request amid new charges

7 296 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Trump Promoted Companies on Truth Social Days After Buying Their Stocks PitDAWG 07/17/26 01:53 PM
If only you had any idea what that meant Joe McCarthy.
14 290 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Republican Right Wing Nuts - Part ???? PitDAWG 07/15/26 04:15 PM
Trump endorses MyPillow's Mike Lindell in race for Minnesota governor

https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/trump-endorses-mypillow-mike-lindell-for-minnesota-governor/

This sounds more like something that belongs in the joke thread but it's actually true.
390 38,520 Read More
Palus Politicus
Re: Trump will Keep Jet Qutar Gifted the U.S. For Presidential Library PitDAWG 07/14/26 04:47 PM
New Air Force One Lacks Defensive Countermeasures of Previous Model, Officials Say

Experts said the lack of such capabilities poses a potential risk when the president travels overseas. The White House defended the aircraft’s safety.

The new Air Force One, which President Trump flew on earlier this week to Turkey, lacks the same defensive countermeasures that were security features of the old model, including its advanced antimissile capabilities, according to multiple officials who have been briefed on how the jet was retrofitted.

Experts say the absence of those capabilities on the Boeing 747-8 aircraft, which was donated by Qatar, creates potential risk in using the jet abroad, a dynamic underscored by the abrupt decision on Wednesday for Mr. Trump to leave Turkey on the old Air Force One at the urging of the Secret Service.

The episode is intensifying the focus on Mr. Trump’s demands to rapidly retrofit the donated 747 to replace an aging fleet that had served as the official presidential planes.

Lawmakers have called on the administration to disclose whether the overhaul of the Qatari plane, which the Air Force oversaw in the course of the last year, provided sufficient security upgrades. The safety of the aircraft is critical not only for the president, but also for the large entourage of White House staff, Secret Service officials, journalists and guests who fly aboard.

Mr. Trump pushed for the new plane to be put into use as quickly as possible and frequently complained that the old presidential aircraft was not impressive enough to take on international trips.

On Thursday, the White House did not address specific questions about the new plane’s capabilities, but defended its safety.

“The new Air Force One is a state-of-the-art aircraft that has been fitted with high-level security protocols that ensure the safety of the president and his staff,” Steven Cheung, the communications director, said in a statement. “As the president has said recently, there are many enemies of America who have their sights on him, and we use every tool at our disposal to address those threats.”

The Air Force has declined to discuss specifics around security systems on the retrofitted Qatari plane, which is being used as a “bridge” aircraft while two Boeing jets that will be part of the permanent presidential fleet are being finished.

But in a statement it made when it announced that the donated jet was ready to transport the president, it acknowledged that the temporary plane did not have all the equipment usually found on an Air Force One.

“No risk was taken in security, safety or mission communications,” the Air Force said in a statement on June 19. “But the collective team made trades on some of the less commonly used mission sets that Boeing must deliver to support the next 40 years.”

The Air Force would not say what it meant by “less commonly used mission sets.”

However, officials who have been briefed on the retrofitting of the Qatari jet, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe its security features, said it did not have the same counter-defensive capabilities of the previous model.

Two former Air Force officials, who had both been involved in the effort to replace the older Air Force One planes, said they were surprised to see Mr. Trump fly on the new jet overseas, where there are greater security risks. Turkey, where Mr. Trump attended a NATO summit, borders Iran, which the United States pummeled with renewed strikes this week.

The former officials were not involved with the retrofitting of the Qatari jet, but said the speed of the project meant there would not have been enough time to make all of the security modifications that are traditionally associated with a fully equipped presidential aircraft.

“Time didn’t permit all the normal Air Force One modifications, so some mix of security, communications and support is missing,” said Frank Kendall, the former Air Force secretary who was in charge of the department as it tried to push Boeing to accelerate its long-delayed contract to deliver two new Air Force One planes.

“With the Iran situation, this could be of concern,” Mr. Kendall said. “Frankly, I’m surprised to see this plane used outside the U.S.”

Andrew P. Hunter, the former Air Force assistant secretary who was in charge of the Air Force One program during the Biden administration, also said that a true retrofit of a 747 jet to prepare it to become Air Force One would require more than a year of work.

The day before Mr. Trump left for Turkey, Senate Democrats wrote to the Air Force asking questions about the modifications to the Qatari plane and questioning whether it had all the necessary security upgrades.

“Trump’s own statements — including his celebration of ‘a level of luxury that nobody’s ever seen before’ — make it clear that these decisions prioritized Trump’s personal comfort and tastes over U.S. national security,” they wrote in the letter sent by Senator Christopher S. Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, and 12 other senators.

The older planes that served as Air Force One included a defensive system designed to defeat heat-seeking missiles. That capacity is also planned to be included in the new Boeing planes, according to three former Pentagon officials.

Different parts of the defensive systems are visible on the old Air Force One, under the wing of the plane and on its tail. They are not observable in photographs of the new Qatari plane, according to a third former Air Force official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the security protocols.

Missile defense systems on Air Force One have seen little use in the history of the aircraft, but have nevertheless been considered critical aspects of the plane’s security features.

The Pentagon published specifications for the Boeing aircraft now under construction that indicate the new jets will include a “self-defense system” and “mission communication system,” as these and other upgrades are needed “to enable the president to execute the duties of head of state, chief executive, and commander in chief.”

U.S. officials have said that Iran has been targeting Mr. Trump since he ordered the drone strike that killed Qassim Suleimani, in January 2020. During the 2024 campaign, the Secret Service increased protection for Mr. Trump, even before the attempt on his life in Butler, Pa., because of intelligence about Iran’s plotting against him.

Despite the resumption of intense U.S. strikes on Iran, American policymakers briefed on the current intelligence do not believe that Iran has a current plan to kill Mr. Trump during this period. A U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe intelligence assessments, said that Iran had a clear understanding of what kind of deep provocation any attempt on Mr. Trump’s life would be and the intensity of an American response.

Nevertheless, the Secret Service was concerned enough about Mr. Trump’s proximity to the country while in Ankara to force the president to swap planes on the way out of the country, as The New York Times first reported Wednesday.

In announcing the change, Mr. Trump offered a different story: He claimed that he was flying out on the old plane so the new jet could leave early and make stops at U.S. military bases to show it off to the troops because the aircraft is “magnificent.”

One former senior White House official involved in discussions about military aircraft used for presidential travel said that there were frequently points of tension between White House staff and the military advisers and Secret Service over travel plans when security questions emerged.

But when the military experts demanded changes, White House officials generally let them prevail, with “course of action” plans that mitigated potential threats.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/09/us/politics/new-air-force-one-defensive-countermeasures.html

And in response to the NYT exposing their incompetence.........................

DOJ subpoenas NYT journalists over Air Force One report

The Trump administration hit four New York Times journalists with subpoenas on Friday, after the outlet published a story outlining risks involving President Trump’s Qatar-gifted Air Force One plane that recently entered into service.

The Times reported that the refurbished jet lacked some of the advanced security measures of the older aircraft used to transport the president.

The reporters include Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager and Eric Schmitt. They also wrote earlier this week that a security precaution forced Trump to depart to the NATO summit in Turkey on the old Air Force One, were called to testify next week before a federal grand jury in Manhattan “in regard to an alleged violation of federal criminal law.” The switch-up also raised red flags around potential threats against the president from Iran after the U.S. launched fresh strikes on the Islamic Republic earlier this week.

The outlet noted that before publication, a senior FBI official contacted it requesting to halt the article for national security reasons but declined to provide details. The subpoenas were reportedly delivered to the journalists at their homes by federal agents.

The Times condemned the move, calling it an act of intimidation and an attack on press freedom.

“The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects,” Times attorney David McCraw said in a statement.

“Our journalists report the facts and advance the American public’s right to know how their government is operating and their taxpayer dollars are being used,” he continued. “This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs.”

Press advocates also denounced the Justice Department’s (DOJ) actions, saying the move threatens constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment.

“The Justice Department’s decision to subpoena journalists at The New York Times should alarm every American because it threatens the public’s constitutional right to an independent press,” the National Press Club said in a statement, requesting that DOJ withdraw the subpoenas.

The nonprofit organization Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) called the controversy around the Qatari-gifted Boeing 747-8 an “embarrassment” for the Trump administration.

“We’ve long said that when the government claims it needs to investigate journalists to protect national security, it really means its own reputational security,” FPF advocacy chief Seth Stern said in a statement.

“The administration’s embarrassment that it reportedly charged taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit a flying bribe that still isn’t secure enough for hostile times does not supersede the need for a free and independent press,” Stern added.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/polit...-times-journalists-air-force-one-report/

At least they didn't try to claim the problem was created by accusing someone of cutting the wiring of the plane with a knife.
6 443 Read More
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5