Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 8 of 13 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 12 13
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,890
A
Legend
Online
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,890
j/c

Wonder why we haven't heard about this?

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,075
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,075
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg
j/c

Wonder why we haven't heard about this?



You haven't because it doesn't fit the mindset of our current societal framework.

I can go on and on about teachers being bitten, knocked down, kicked, bones broken, glasses broken, clothing torn, called fuc***, hair, ripped out and in one case, a broken jaw. But districts do nothing because administration runs like a puppy with their tail between their legs after being threatened by the societal bully of entitled people. If a teacher dare threaten action individually, their job is threatened. This is the current mindset of our society...blame authority and enable reprehensible behavior.

I worked in education for 32 years and never had any issue of this nature. However, I saw many, many colleagues leave the profession because of a lack of protection and support, among other things.

Our society is so incredibly backward. We are traveling a dangerous path and our youth will suffer the ramifications. As long as we excuse and justify ignorance, whatever the reason, we will wallow in the depths of conflict and unrest.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,890
A
Legend
Online
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,890
Agreed. But it's not just the youth that will suffer. (on a side note, watching that, then watching a bunch of other videos about violence in class rooms......wow).

Microwave society: I want it, and I want it now.

And there's too much "glamour" involved in bucking authority. From cops, to teachers, authority figures are under attack. Too little respect given.

Not taught at home. Not modeled at home. Too many are of the opinion "I'll do what I want, when I want. And I better get mine."

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,075
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,075
Originally Posted By: rockdogg
Now how about we consider the reasons the officer didn't understand when and how to restrain.

Is it because he relies on a guaranteed paycheck regardless of his behavior? wink


Guess not because he has no paycheck now.

Well, I suppose there could be an entire host of excuses as some have made for the student in this case. Yet, it does not make it right.

My question to you is what would have happened had this student complied with relinquishing her phone for the class and leaving the classrrom as she had been asked three times? I

Are we really at a point in this country when simple requests like this must become a major issue? Are we really at a point in this country where people make their own choices regardless of rules and laws and video the consequences for a few moments of getting noticed?

We need people with common sense to speak up here.

This is sad, disgusting and destructive, to say the least.


#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,643
couldnt pay me enough to be a teacher these days...

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
If you hear a loud sucking sound it will be our Society going down the drain.

Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,075
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,075
I just want us all to think about what might have happened if this student simplu complied with the first three requests.

Will this student's resilience carry her through her life, perhaps college? Or, will she expect everything, including good grades and a degeee to be handed to her since she now obviously believes she has to follow no rules except her own and she may defy anyone she chooses.


#gmstrong
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Originally Posted By: Cjrae
I just want us all to think about what might have happened if this student simplu complied with the first three requests.

Will this student's resilience carry her through her life, perhaps college? Or, will she expect everything, including good grades and a degeee to be handed to her since she now obviously believes she has to follow no rules except her own and she may defy anyone she chooses.


You really don't want a Conservative's opinion on this because the Liberal/Progressives can't hear it anyway.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,605
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,605
Originally Posted By: gage
Originally Posted By: GMdawg

Oh I would either want two other people there to witness it OR have them video tape it to make sure there is no abuse.


I had a witness to my paddling in school! But it was the principals wife. Ya know, the same guy who did the paddling. Not very effective frown

I was a straight A student until that event. My grades went down in the 2 years following until I left the school. Then they went back to A's. I wasn't concerned with my school work anymore. I just didn't want to get in trouble. We had kids paddled for chewing gum. We had kids paddled because their parents couldn't afford belts for their pants, but some of their pants had belt loops. Because same parents couldn't afford other pants. If this all sounds normal to you then I don't know what to say...


Paddled by the Principal, with the Principals wife as a witness, over something the principals kid said. Sounds like that school needs to fire a principal to me.

Quote:
We had kids paddled for chewing gum. We had kids paddled because their parents couldn't afford belts for their pants, but some of their pants had belt loops. Because same parents couldn't afford other pants.


See my comments above about the Principal bro. None of that crap sounds normal to me


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,605
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,605
I think the teacher is at fault for not slowly and calmly counting to three, and in a even nicer tone of voice reminding the student of the possibility of a threatened time out notallthere


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg
j/c

Wonder why we haven't heard about this?
We have heard about it. It was all over the news and social media.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Originally Posted By: Cjrae
Originally Posted By: rockdogg
Now how about we consider the reasons the officer didn't understand when and how to restrain.

Is it because he relies on a guaranteed paycheck regardless of his behavior? wink


Guess not because he has no paycheck now.

But he would if he had only chosen the proper way to handle the situation instead of feeling entitled to manhandle a teenage girl for not giving up her phone.

What part of our society encourages his violence, not disruption, but violence?

Maybe it's the feeling of entitlement to act as judge and jury merely because you have a badge. Maybe it's because he believes the problem of society is that a group of people who have very little are actually entitled.


Well, I suppose there could be an entire host of excuses as some have made for the student in this case. Yet, it does not make it right.

Only if you insist on calling reasons "excuses" and refuse to consider both sides of the conflict. IMO there was a roomful and probably more of individuals who were wrong, but we're still insisting the problem is the child. A child who has reason to believe the law is prejudiced against her.

Why would she believe that?


My question to you is what would have happened had this student complied with relinquishing her phone for the class and leaving the classrrom as she had been asked three times? I

The answer is obvious. No conflict. What would have happened if the officer had handled the situation of a child misbehaving without violently yanking her out of her desk, throwing her to the ground and handcuffing her? My guess is this video would not exist.

You keep talking about people making excuses for a child misbehaving, but it seems there are more examples of excuses for the officer on this thread.

How is this not a conflict between 2?


Are we really at a point in this country when simple requests like this must become a major issue? Are we really at a point in this country where people make their own choices regardless of rules and laws and video the consequences for a few moments of getting noticed?

Would it have become a major issue if the officer had handled the situation by following the law? I'm wondering what excuses are being offered for him being fired. Was his boss a 16 year old girl?

Yes we are at a point when people make their own choices regardless of rules and laws. We've been there forever. Why do you think we have a justice system? Because nobody breaks the law?

What law was being broken in this case?

She was an annoying child refusing to comply. Find the law against that please and then find the correct consequence for breaking that law to see if it involves violent enforcement.

Again, as long as people insist on calling reasons for her behavior excuses without providing reasons for the other, VERY APPARENT and extremely inappropriate behavior of the response of the other person in this conflict then we're just engaging in nonsense.


We need people with common sense to speak up here.

I'm trying, but it requires common sense responses from you too.

This is sad, disgusting and destructive, to say the least.

Absolutely.

But if you want to ask for solutions to a societal problem while refusing to acknowledge the whole problem then you are part of the problem.

I know the problems teachers encounter because they are now forbidden by law to use corporal punishment. These are the same educators who know the limitations and consequences of corporal punishment on any student other than a normally compliant one.

If you want to paddle compliance into a child who receives or sees corporal punishment regularly then eventually you'll need to up the ante and probably end up with prisons full of what were once non-compliant students.

We are currently in that sad and destructive situation and the obvious result has made the situation worse.

I would really appreciate someone explaining how people who are living in the poorest conditions this country has to offer, and yes it's better than living in some of the other countries, feel more entitled than the people who insist on calling these people entitled.

Also, why is this imaginary entitlement often being offered as the cause of problems in this country?

Is our society so broken that we're continually willing to place the blame on the least entitled citizens?

Common sense doesn't fit that opinion.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,195
Originally Posted By: GMdawg
I think the teacher is at fault for not slowly and calmly counting to three, and in a even nicer tone of voice reminding the student of the possibility of a threatened time out notallthere
The actual reality, and you can check it out for yourself, is that students are removed from the school.

The urban schools have a serious situation to deal with. They don't have the resources to deal with students who have little to no resources. I seriously doubt a timeout would be effective.

So yea, student behavior is a problem, but if you insist on calling a kid with no resources "entitled" then offer the evidence of that entitlement other than bad behavior. Are you talking about "Participation" trophies?

The word "Entitled" doesn't come close to explaining behavior problems in schools.


Now if you really want to see examples of entitlement then look toward the other end of the socioeconomic spectrum.

The use of the idea of "entitlement" is another political opposite speak offered by resentful pundits who hate that other people get stuff.

More accurately, it's powerless people they resent.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
I think by "entitled", he means, they think they don't have to live by the rules of society or listen to authority figures.

That's essentially what we are currently raising, kids who don't feel they need to listen to anyone but themselves, regardless of what they are doing or who they are being spoken to by.


We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
wow, that sounds like...oh i dunno, every generation of kids...ever.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Originally Posted By: Swish
wow, that sounds like...oh i dunno, every generation of kids...ever.


You must be young.

Yes we tested our limits, but we also knew when not to push it because getting our ass beat was not the point we wanted to reach.


We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
you realize that's still the majority of my generation right? that most of us understand how the game is played.

i love this "my generation understood" nonsense,

even though the violent crime rate was HIGHER back in your day. funny ain't it?

social media got you guys thinking this is the norm, when in reality i bet the we'd find the same crap happen just as often in your generation if people had camera phones back then.

Last edited by Swish; 10/31/15 07:57 AM.

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,075
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,075
B
Originally Posted By: rockdogg
Originally Posted By: Cjrae
Originally Posted By: rockdogg
Now how about we consider the reasons the officer didn't understand when and how to restrain.

Is it because he relies on a guaranteed paycheck regardless of his behavior? wink


Guess not because he has no paycheck now.

But he would if he had only chosen the proper way to handle the situation instead of feeling entitled to manhandle a teenage girl for not giving up her phone.

What part of our society encourages his violence, not disruption, but violence?

Maybe it's the feeling of entitlement to act as judge and jury merely because you have a badge. Maybe it's because he believes the problem of society is that a group of people who have very little are actually entitled.


Well, I suppose there could be an entire host of excuses as some have made for the student in this case. Yet, it does not make it right.

Only if you insist on calling reasons "excuses" and refuse to consider both sides of the conflict. IMO there was a roomful and probably more of individuals who were wrong, but we're still insisting the problem is the child. A child who has reason to believe the law is prejudiced against her.

Why would she believe that?


My question to you is what would have happened had this student complied with relinquishing her phone for the class and leaving the classrrom as she had been asked three times? I

The answer is obvious. No conflict. What would have happened if the officer had handled the situation of a child misbehaving without violently yanking her out of her desk, throwing her to the ground and handcuffing her? My guess is this video would not exist.

You keep talking about people making excuses for a child misbehaving, but it seems there are more examples of excuses for the officer on this thread.

How is this not a conflict between 2?


Are we really at a point in this country when simple requests like this must become a major issue? Are we really at a point in this country where people make their own choices regardless of rules and laws and video the consequences for a few moments of getting noticed?

Would it have become a major issue if the officer had handled the situation by following the law? I'm wondering what excuses are being offered for him being fired. Was his boss a 16 year old girl?

Yes we are at a point when people make their own choices regardless of rules and laws. We've been there forever. Why do you think we have a justice system? Because nobody breaks the law?

What law was being broken in this case?

She was an annoying child refusing to comply. Find the law against that please and then find the correct consequence for breaking that law to see if it involves violent enforcement.

Again, as long as people insist on calling reasons for her behavior excuses without providing reasons for the other, VERY APPARENT and extremely inappropriate behavior of the response of the other person in this conflict then we're just engaging in nonsense.


We need people with common sense to speak up here.

I'm trying, but it requires common sense responses from you too.

This is sad, disgusting and destructive, to say the least.

Absolutely.

But if you want to ask for solutions to a societal problem while refusing to acknowledge the whole problem then you are part of the problem.

I know the problems teachers encounter because they are now forbidden by law to use corporal punishment. These are the same educators who know the limitations and consequences of corporal punishment on any student other than a normally compliant one.

If you want to paddle compliance into a child who receives or sees corporal punishment regularly then eventually you'll need to up the ante and probably end up with prisons full of what were once non-compliant students.

We are currently in that sad and destructive situation and the obvious result has made the situation worse.

I would really appreciate someone explaining how people who are living in the poorest conditions this country has to offer, and yes it's better than living in some of the other countries, feel more entitled than the people who insist on calling these people entitled.

Also, why is this imaginary entitlement often being offered as the cause of problems in this country?

Is our society so broken that we're continually willing to place the blame on the least entitled citizens?

Common sense doesn't fit that opinion.



Common sense is not only warranted and applicable but it is a must.

OK, you win, let's just keep doing what we always did and getting what we always got. Makes a bunch of sense. This thread,is going nowhere. My old, out of touch, decrepid and non sensical mind cannot comprehend this nonsense.

Snicker...snicker.....carry on!,,,.......


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Originally Posted By: Swish

even though the violent crime rate was HIGHER back in your day. funny ain't it?


Funny how violent crimes started dropping around the same time (mid 90's) states started enacting Concealed Carry laws. wink

Code:
United States Crime Rates 1960 - 2014
United States Population and Number of Crimes  1960 - 2014






Forcible 	
Aggravated 	
Larceny- 	Vehicle 
Year 	Population 	Total	Violent 	Property 	Murder 	Rape 	Robbery 	assault 	Burglary 	Theft 	Theft 
1960 	179,323,175 	3,384,200 	288,460 	3,095,700 	9,110 	17,190 	107,840 	154,320 	912,100 	1,855,400 	328,200 
1961 	182,992,000 	3,488,000 	289,390 	3,198,600 	8,740 	17,220 	106,670 	156,760 	949,600 	1,913,000 	336,000 
1962 	185,771,000 	3,752,200 	301,510 	3,450,700 	8,530 	17,550 	110,860 	164,570 	994,300 	2,089,600 	366,800 
1963 	188,483,000	4,109,500 	316,970 	3,792,500 	8,640 	17,650	116,470 	174,210 	1,086,400 	2,297,800 	408,300 
1964 	191,141,000 	4,564,600 	364,220 	4,200,400 	9,360 	21,420 	130,390 	203,050 	1,213,200 	2,514,400 	472,800 
1965 	193,526,000 	4,739,400 	387,390 	4,352,000 	9,960 	23,410 	138,690 	215,330 	1,282,500 	2,572,600 	496,900 
1966 	195,576,000 	5,223,500 	430,180 	4,793,300 	11,040 	25,820 	157,990 	235,330 	1,410,100 	2,822,000 	561,200 
1967 	197,457,000 	5,903,400 	499,930 	5,403,500 	12,240 	27,620 	202,910 	257,160 	1,632,100 	3,111,600 	659,800 
1968 	199,399,000 	6,720,200 	595,010 	6,125,200 	13,800 	31,670 	262,840 	286,700 	1,858,900 	3,482,700 	783,600 
1969 	201,385,000 	7,410,900 	661,870 	6,749,000 	14,760 	37,170 	298,850 	311,090 	1,981,900 	3,888,600 	878,500 






Forcible 	
Aggravated 	
Larceny- 	Vehicle 
Year 	Population 	Total	Violent 	Property 	Murder 	Rape 	Robbery 	assault 	Burglary 	Theft 	Theft 
1970 	203,235,298 	8,098,000 	738,820 	7,359,200 	16,000 	37,990 	349,860 	334,970 	2,205,000 	4,225,800 	928,400 
1971 	206,212,000 	8,588,200 	816,500 	7,771,700 	17,780 	42,260 	387,700 	368,760 	2,399,300 	4,424,200 	948,200 
1972 	208,230,000 	8,248,800 	834,900 	7,413,900 	18,670 	46,850 	376,290 	393,090 	2,375,500 	4,151,200 	887,200 
1973 	209,851,000 	8,718,100 	875,910 	7,842,200 	19,640 	51,400 	384,220 	420,650 	2,565,500 	4,347,900 	928,800 
1974 	211,392,000 	10,253,400 	974,720 	9,278,700 	20,710 	55,400 	442,400 	456,210 	3,039,200 	5,262,500 	977,100 
1975 	213,124,000 	11,292,400 	1,039,710 	10,252,700 	20,510 	56,090 	470,500 	492,620 	3,265,300 	5,977,700 	1,009,600 
1976 	214,659,000 	11,349,700 	1,004,210 	10,345,500 	18,780 	57,080 	427,810 	500,530 	3,108,700 	6,270,800 	966,000 
1977 	216,332,000 	10,984,500 	1,029,580 	9,955,000 	19,120 	63,500 	412,610 	534,350 	3,071,500 	5,905,700 	977,700 
1978 	218,059,000 	11,209,000 	1,085,550 	10,123,400 	19,560 	67,610 	426,930 	571,460 	3,128,300 	5,991,000 	1,004,100 
1979 	220,099,000 	12,249,500 	1,208,030 	11,041,500 	21,460 	76,390 	480,700 	629,480 	3,327,700 	6,601,000 	1,112,800 






Forcible 	
Aggravated 	
Larceny- 	Vehicle 
Year 	Population 	Total	Violent 	Property 	Murder 	Rape 	Robbery 	assault 	Burglary 	Theft 	Theft 
1980 	225,349,264 	13,408,300 	1,344,520 	12,063,700 	23,040 	82,990 	565,840 	672,650 	3,795,200 	7,136,900 	1,131,700 
1981 	229,146,000 	13,423,800 	1,361,820 	12,061,900 	22,520 	82,500 	592,910 	663,900 	3,779,700 	7,194,400 	1,087,800 
1982 	231,534,000 	12,974,400 	1,322,390 	11,652,000 	21,010 	78,770 	553,130 	669,480 	3,447,100 	7,142,500 	1,062,400 
1983 	233,981,000 	12,108,600 	1,258,090 	10,850,500 	19,310 	78,920 	506,570 	653,290 	3,129,900 	6,712,800 	1,007,900 
1984 	236,158,000 	11,881,800 	1,273,280 	10,608,500	18,690 	84,230 	485,010 	685,350 	2,984,400 	6,591,900 	1,032,200 
1985 	238,740,000 	12,431,400 	1,328,800 	11,102,600 	18,980 	88,670 	497,870 	723,250 	3,073,300 	6,926,400 	1,102,900
1986 	240,132,887 	13,211,869 	1,489,169 	11,722,700 	20,613 	91,459 	542,775 	834,322 	3,241,410 	7,257,153 	1,224,137 
1987 	242,282,918 	13,508,700 	1,483,999 	12,024,700 	20,096 	91,110 	517,704 	855,088 	3,236,184 	7,499,900 	1,288,674 
1988 	245,807,000 	13,923,100 	1,566,220 	12,356,900 	20,680 	92,490 	542,970 	910,090 	3,218,100 	7,705,900 	1,432,900 
1989 	248,239,000 	14,251,400 	1,646,040 	12,605,400 	21,500 	94,500 	578,330 	951,710 	3,168,200 	7,872,400 	1,564,800 






Forcible 	
Aggravated 	
Larceny- 	Vehicle 
Year 	Population 	Total	Violent 	Property 	Murder 	Rape 	Robbery 	assault 	Burglary 	Theft 	Theft 
1990 	248,709,873 	14,475,600 	1,820,130 	12,655,500 	23,440 	102,560 	639,270 	1,054,860 	3,073,900 	7,945,700 	1,635,900 
1991 	252,177,000 	14,872,900 	1,911,770 	12,961,100 	24,700 	106,590 	687,730	1,092,740 	3,157,200 	8,142,200 	1,661,700 
1992 	255,082,000 	14,438,200 	1,932,270 	12,505,900 	23,760 	109,060 	672,480 	1,126,970 	2,979,900 	7,915,200 	1,610,800 
1993 	257,908,000 	14,144,800 	1,926,020 	12,218,800 	24,530 	106,010 	659,870 	1,135,610 	2,834,800 	7,820,900 	1,563,100 
1994 	260,341,000 	13,989,500 	1,857,670 	12,131,900 	23,330 	102,220 	618,950 	1,113,180 	2,712,800 	7,879,800 	1,539,300 
1995 	262,755,000 	13,862,700 	1,798,790 	12,063,900 	21,610 	97,470 	580,510 	1,099,210 	2,593,800 	7,997,700 	1,472,400 
1996 	265,228,572 	13,493,863 	1,688,540 	11,805,300 	19,650 	96,250 	535,590 	1,037,050 	2,506,400 	7,904,700 	1,394,200 
1997 	267,637,000 	13,194,571 	1,634,770 	11,558,175 	18,208 	96,153 	498,534 	1,023,201 	2,460,526 	7,743,760 	1,354,189 
1998 	270,296,000 	12,475,634 	1,531,044 	10,944,590 	16,914 	93,103 	446,625 	974,402 	2,329,950 	7,373,886 	1,240,754 
1999 	272,690,813 	11,634,378 	1,426,044 	10,208,334 	15,522 	89,411	409,371 	911,740 	2,100,739 	6,955,520 	1,152,075 






Forcible 	
Aggravated 	
Larceny- 	Vehicle 
Year 	Population 	Total	Violent 	Property 	Murder 	Rape 	Robbery 	assault 	Burglary 	Theft 	Theft 
2000 	281,421,906 	11,608,072 	1,425,486 	10,182,586 	15,586 	90,178 	408,016 	911,706 	2,050,992 	6,971,590 	1,160,002 
2001 	285,317,559 	11,876,669 	1,439,480 	10,437,480 	16,037 	90,863 	423,557 	909,023 	2,116,531 	7,092,267 	1,228,391 
2002 	287,973,924 	11,878,954	1,423,677 	10,455,277 	16,229 	95,235 	420,806 	891,407 	2,151,252 	7,057,370 	1,246,646 
2003 	290,690,788 	11,826,538	1,383,676 	10,442,862 	16,528 	93,883	414,235 	859,030 	2,154,834 	7,026,802 	1,261,226 
2004 	293,656,842 	11,679,474	1,360,088 	10,319,386 	16,148 	95,089 	401,470 	847,381 	2,144,446 	6,937,089 	1,237,851 
2005 	296,507,061 	11,565,499	1,390,745 	10,174,754 	16,740 	94,347 	417,438 	862,220	2,155,448 	6,783,447 	1,235,859 
2006 	299,398,484 	11,401,511	1,418,043 	9,983,568 	17,030 	92,757 	447,403 	860,853 	2,183,746 	6,607,013 	1,192,809 
2007 	301,621,157 	11,251,828	1,408,337 	9,843,481 	16,929 	90,427 	445,125 	855,856 	2,176,140 	6,568,572 	1,095,769 
2008 	304,374,846 	11,160,543	1,392,628 	9,767,915 	16,442 	90,479 	443,574 	842,134 	2,228,474 	6,588,046	958,629 
2009 	307,006,550 	10,762,956	1,325,896 	9,337,060 	15,399 	89,241 	408,742	812,514	2,203,313	6,338,095 	795,652






Forcible 	
Aggravated 	
Larceny- 	Vehicle 
Year 	Population 	Total	Violent 	Property 	Murder 	Rape 	Robbery 	assault 	Burglary 	Theft 	Theft 
2010	309,330,219	10,363,873	1,251,248	9,112,625	14,772	85,593	369,089	781,844	2,168,457	6,204,601	739,565
2011	311,587,816	10,258,774	1,206,031	9,052,743	14,661	84,175	354,772	752,423	2,185,140	6,151,095	716,508
2012	313,873,685	10,219,059	1,217,067	9,001,992	14,866	85,141	355,051	762,009	2,109,932	6,168,874	723,186
2013	316,497,531	9,850,445	1,199,684	8,650,761	14,319	82,109	345,095	726,575	1,931,835	6,018,632	700,294
2014	318,857,056	9,475,816	1,197,987	8,277,829	14,249	84,041	325,802	741,291	1,729,806	5,858,496	689,527


We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
sorry but that's a horrible correlation. i mean, thats really bad.

because if you want to somehow attribute that to the CCW, than i could easily say that it's also the cause for mass shootings steadily rising.

so that's a massive reach. it's funny how you didn't use the booming economy as the focal point, seeing as how studies have shown that a country with a strong economy typically has less violence.

but anyway, i expected nothing less. you tried to get side tracked after i destroyed your argument about the "my generation" nonsense. stick to the topic. your generation and any past that have so seriously nasty history, so it's mind boggling how anybody on this board can somehow claim moral high ground.

80's - war on drugs. what a colossal failure and money grab for the prison systems.
70's - lol
40's, 50's, 60's - literally the most racist times in our country. jim crow, pre civil rights movement, segregation.

i don't wanna hear this crap about "my generation was taught respect"

because your generation was also taught to hate people for the color of their skin. so i guess it's a wash, huh?

this whole crap with people trying to act all high and mighty about "their generation" needs to stop.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
I enjoy reading your posts on the subject. It's instructive to listen to educators who have done this for a long time. Really what you are writing is no different than what I have heard from any teacher who has taught for a couple decades or more. The input of young teachers is valuable as well, but they lack the experience and specifically have not seen how people have changed over time. They are kind of encapsulated in the same bubble, if that makes any sense.

What I mean by that is that it's very hard for a young person to have a good grasp on what life was like before modern technologies. We grew up with them, they have always been part of our lives and we don't have an idea that it's not necessarily optimal, things can be improved, etc. How often do you hear about a seemingly healthy man in his 20s complaining of brain fog, lack of motivation, and just general depression/misery? A lot of people think those things are normal. They are only normal in the sense of it being relatively common in modern society. It's not normal in the 'optimal' sense or in historical context.

I'm 29 so when I say we, I am kind of including myself in the younger group, although I am also the youngest person I know who a good grasp on this. That sounds bad but it's accurate based on the people I personally know.

I think we are pretty much raising a nation of addicts. It's not just drugs and gambling and other stereotypical addictions; it's all the other stuff I've written about here on the past: video games, hardcore porn, excessive internet usage in general, social media, manufactured junk food, etc.

Addicts often behave in ways that are irrational to non-addicts. All addictions impact the same basic brain changes. So if a girl literally will not give up her phone, doing a little implying and making some assumptions, she's probably addicted to the phone and whatever she is doing on there (Instagram and Facebook?). Sure there's no chemical aspect and no immediate risk of overdosing or anything. But it's also not, 'just acting like a teenager'. More accurate would be something like, 'acting like a teenager who has a strong addiction'.

It's not like human genetics have changed meaningfully in the last generation. What has changed is the environment that people are raised in-- in general a vastly more stimulating and addicting world, instant gratification expected in most things, modern conveniences etc. These have very tangible effects on people, and young people in particular who are being raised in a world that evolution has not prepared people for. Some of those changes have been extensively studied (brain atrophy/hypofrontality is one that I've mentioned on here a few times) and can readily be found via a quick Google.

There's some irony there in recommending Google-- I get that. I'm not anti-technology by any stretch, technology can do absolutely amazing things. It just gets abused a lot, and young people in general are growing up in front of screens with limitless stimulation from games, social media, general internet usage and are by and large not doing things more natural in human development like socializing, exercising, eating and sleeping well, and all that.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
First I only pointed it out because you made a claim that violent crime decreased, which lead me me to insinuate that you believe the younger generation is less violent, since you gave no reason why you think that violence has dropped.

Furthermore, my opinion is based on what I see daily, not on facebook or social media. So don't hand me the bull crap line about "social media got you guys thinking this is the norm"

My facebook page is filled with stupid Memes, food recipes, cool cars photos, family vacation and holiday photos, and some news crap (most of which is so one sides it is ridiculous), and I hardly even pay much attention to my page period. So I don't have social media distorting my views.


Don't pull the "wow, that sounds like...oh i dunno, every generation of kids...ever.", when all I did was give my personal opinion based on my own 2 eyes.

You want to disagree fine, but keep your sarcastic attitude to yourself.




We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
not really.

if you don't like the way i post, you have options:

1. put me on ignore.
2. start a petition to have me removed from the board.
3. deal with it.

i post how i post. don't get mad cause i called you out on your BS "my generation" nonsense.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
What I have noticed in our Society is kids raised in a loving family who are taught "The Rules and Limits" in our Society and who witness first hand the American work ethic, do remarkably well in our Society.

Those raised by druggies and parasites who tend more to their own selfish needs than to their children, not so much.

The first group ends up having to arm themselves against the second group as they grow to adulthood for the second group will take away everything the first group has earned and built.

As our Society has filled with the second group over the years, we, the first group, are considered wrong and uncaring extremists and our Society goes down the drain.

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
Step out of your bubble, 40. It'll do you good.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
thats how they further the divide.

the "us vs them" mentality.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:
social media got you guys thinking this is the norm, when in reality i bet the we'd find the same crap happen just as often in your generation if people had camera phones back then.

I'll throw the BS flag on that. I don't know if it can be proven, if the stats even exist.... This notion that nothing has really changed, that the only change is that through social media we are now aware of it... that's crap, that's a cop out excuse for a generation of kids that are full of themselves and think rules don't apply to them.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: Swish
thats how they further the divide.

the "us vs them" mentality.

It's not an "us vs them" mentality. ANYBODY can be part of "us"... just have kids you are going to take care of, discipline them, raise them right.. I don't expect them to be perfect, God knows mine aren't, just put in the effort..... Do that and I'll gladly welcome you into my bubble, I don't care if you are rich, poor, black, white, gay, straight...


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Students walk out to support fired S.C. deputy
Doug Stanglin, USA TODAY 9:32 a.m. EDT October 31, 2015

About 100 students at a South Carolina high school walked out of class briefly Friday to show support for a school resource officer fired after video showed him throwing an uncooperative black female student across the floor, according to local media and Twitter feeds.

The students walked out of classes at Spring Valley High School in Columbia, S.C., around 10 a.m. and gathered in the atrium to express their views on the firing of Deputy Ben Fields.

Some in the crowd — which included both black and white students — wore T-shirts reading "Free Fields" or "#BringBackFields."

Some students had originally said their intent was to walk out of the building, but the students did not leave the campus, WLTX-TV reports. Spring Valley High School has a current enrollment of 2,059. students.

"I addressed the students to let them know that we understood their need to make their voices heard," Temoney wrote, according to WLTX. "Then I reminded them that Spring Valley High is all about the business of teaching and learning, so it's time to go back to class."

School district officials told WCSC-TV that the walkout was "small" and "orderly."

Richland County Sheriff Leon Lott fired Fields on Wednesday, saying the school resource officer did not follow the department's guidelines when he forcibly removed a black female student from a classroom Monday. Lott specifically said the deputy, who is white, broke protocol when he threw the student across the class

In Temoney's remarks to the students, captured on video, he stresses that none would be suspended over the walkout.

"We've heard your voices, okay," the administrator told the protesters. "We appreciate you taking time to do this, but again, as you know, we always focus on teaching and learning, so let's head on back to class."

John Cassibry, a 17-year-old senior, posted a video of the demonstration and photos of students wearing protest T-shirts.

Cassibry, who participated in the protest, told The Huffington Post that while he did not agree with Fields' conduct in arresting the student, he also did not believe the officer deserved to be fired.

"I believe it is important as a student to voice my opinion," Cassibry told HuffPost."My belief on Deputy Fields is just that — I do believe he was too aggressive, but I do not believe it was any circumstance to lose his job, nor do I believe it was race-driven."

The footage of the original incident sparked a national debate on the officer's actions.

In the original confrontation on Monday, Fields can be heard telling the student to get up. A few moments later, he grabbed the student as she was in her seat, which caused the girl and the chair to flip over onto the floor. Fields was then seen dragging the girl for several feet and restraining her on the ground.

Lott said Fields had the right to put his hands on the student, but that when he threw the girl across the room, that is when he violated the training.

The U.S. Department of Justice has launched a civil rights investigation into the incident

In a statement, Scott Hayes, Fields' attorney thanked people Friday for their support, adding "the positive response and heartfelt support of Ben has been overwhelming," WCSC-TV reports.

Hayes continued, "We believe that Mr. Fields' actions were justified and lawful throughout the circumstances of which he was confronted during this incident. To that extent, we believe that Mr. Fields' actions were carried out professionally and that he was performing his job duties within the legal threshold."

Fields was a deputy for 10 years, and also served as an assistant coach for the Spring Valley High football team.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/natio...chool/74874920/


yebat' Putin
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
it's not a bs excuse. it's truth.

just like we've always known cops treat blacks worse, but now they getting busted on camera, and a lot of stuff that wouldn't make it out the local news is now national news.

you're just pissed cause i called you out.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Originally Posted By: Swish
it's not a bs excuse. it's truth.

just like we've always known cops treat blacks worse, but now they getting busted on camera, and a lot of stuff that wouldn't make it out the local news is now national news.

you're just pissed cause i called you out.

I'm not pissed and i don't really give a flying rats ass if you "call me out"...

you are entitled to your own opinion, even if it's wrong.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
What about the statics about the criminal justice system? Overall, minorities make up the majority of the prison population.

This may be a poverty issue more than anything, but still it's fishy.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Originally Posted By: Swish
it's not a bs excuse. it's truth.

just like we've always known cops treat blacks worse, but now they getting busted on camera, and a lot of stuff that wouldn't make it out the local news is now national news.

you're just pissed cause i called you out.

On the race thing: that has been talked about plenty on here. I don't care to get into that discussion. I would only say that it's kind of irrelevant to this topic anyway though; even if there is some truth in what you say about things being caught on camera, it doesn't really mean anything either way as it relates to our generation being screwed up or entitled. What am I missing?

Oh and our generation is screwed up. All those old timers who say that are not all senile, they're not all lying, and they're not all delusional. I see exactly what they are talking about, and sometimes I see it as being worse than they do.

You and I are old enough that we are kind of on the edge of this discussion. It probably applies to people our age some but we are not as bad as the younger kids, even after adjusting for maturing with age. Another way to put that would be that kids these days are less mature than we were at the same age.

I know that there have been some historical writings that suggest this has "always" been the case, which could easily be used to discredit the whole idea. I just don't think that fully explains what we are seeing in today's society. Not even close really.

I see a lot of people today, young people especially but it does to some extent affect all ages that have some or many of the following conditions/attributes: Lazy, depressed, short attention span, lack of critical thinking ability, social awkwardness, anxiety, entitlement, expectations of instant gratification, little in the way of useful skills. 'Declining student resilience' is a spin-off of all that. [edited to add: lack of respect for authority should be mentioned here as well. Certainly not always, but too often]

I'm not assigning blame to anyone in this btw. Really there is plenty to go around. I happen to think that people should not expect anything from anybody else, with the exception of their parent(s) while they are still minors, and that in many ways it is a pretty screwed up world and society that we raise our kids in today. So really either side could take one of those and go with it.

Last edited by hasugopher; 10/31/15 03:29 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,236
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,236
j/c

I find this entire thread laughable. Here is a man in position of authority, abusing a teen aged girl and the problem has mainly been laid at the girl.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
j/c

I find this entire thread laughable. Here is a man in position of authority, abusing a teen aged girl and the problem has mainly been laid at the girl.


To me, the man overreacted in bringing the situation to an end and getting the girl under control.

To me, the girl is another example of a Societal problem we are dealing with today.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
I don't have a problem with this girl being disciplened for her disobediance and disruption of the classroom. I don't have a problem with her being cuffed and taken away.

Kids need to respect authority figures. Whether it be their parents, their teachers, or the police.


No Craps Given
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,236
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 77,236
Maybe you should give that speech to the forefathers of our nation.

People are supposedly hired to protect and serve. He protected nobody and served out physical violence on a minor. He should be in jail. If he weren't wearing a badge, he would be.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Originally Posted By: EveDawg
I don't have a problem with this girl being disciplened for her disobediance and disruption of the classroom. I don't have a problem with her being cuffed and taken away.

Kids need to respect authority figures. Whether it be their parents, their teachers, or the police.


Quoted for Truth.

This is exactly what is needed in order to have and to fit into a Society, otherwise we are not much more than Hunter/Gatherers.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,438
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
Maybe you should give that speech to the forefathers of our nation.

People are supposedly hired to protect and serve. He protected nobody and served out physical violence on a minor. He should be in jail. If he weren't wearing a badge, he would be.


Yeah, that's why there are kids protesting in favor of the cop. tsktsk


No Craps Given
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
j/c

I find this entire thread laughable. Here is a man in position of authority, abusing a teen aged girl and the problem has mainly been laid at the girl.

That didn't even come up until over halfway into the thread. And well, she is at least partially at fault.

That doesn't necessarily justify the officer. From the one video I have seen of the incident, it certainly does look like he used an unreasonable amount of force. Then again I wasn't there, I didn't see what happened beforehand and I don't know the exact protocol he was supposed to follow, so I'm not going to pass too much judgement other than to say it looked really bad.

As others have pointed out though, she had plenty of opportunity to act like a reasonable human being. Put the phone away... or don't have it out in the first place-- kids should not be using phones during class but that's another topic. Listen to the teacher. Listen to the administrator. Listen to the cop. Don't hit the cop. (if rumors of another video existing of her swinging first are true... I have no idea)

Page 8 of 13 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 12 13
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Everything Else... Declining Student Resilience: A Serious Problem for Colleges

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5