Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Quote:

Gov't. makes way too much money on tobacco to ban it altogether.




Exactly, so what's the freaking point of pushing the non-smoking issue? You don't see the government stepping in and saying, "Hey, I think we're going to ban diesel and unleaded fully fueled vehicles and make everyone purchase hybrids". Of course not because they make too much money on gas, no matter how much air pollution it creates. So why are they taking on the opposite position with smoking???

The percentage of smokers has gone down dramatically, yet the price of cigarettes has raised to almost $5 per pack. So what gives? It's not the cigarette companies raising their prices, it's the taxes.

DCDAWGFAN #104824 05/25/07 03:50 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 226
B
1st String
Offline
1st String
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 226
I wish PA would do this. I'd totally vote for a ban on smoking in all bars and restaurants! But then again, we still have the steelers and eagles fans and that's way worse!!!!!


GO BUCKEYES!
GO BROWNS!
[Linked Image from i33.photobucket.com]
#104825 05/25/07 04:04 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Quote:

The percentage of smokers has gone down dramatically, yet the price of cigarettes has raised to almost $5 per pack. So what gives? It's not the cigarette companies raising their prices, it's the taxes.




I always figured it was to help pay all those lawsuits by people who didn't know chain smoking caused cancer. :P


We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
#104826 05/25/07 04:10 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 226
B
1st String
Offline
1st String
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 226
Ok, this may sound dumb but is it really a gov't issue? I thought the PEOPLE of Ohio voted on it. If that's the case then how is the gov't telling people they can't smoke???? Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.


GO BUCKEYES!
GO BROWNS!
[Linked Image from i33.photobucket.com]
Brownsgirl #104827 05/25/07 04:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
A
Legend
Online
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
Quote:

Ok, this may sound dumb but is it really a gov't issue? I thought the PEOPLE of Ohio voted on it. If that's the case then how is the gov't telling people they can't smoke???? Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.




First of all, the people voted on something that wasn't defined, and after passage of "the unknown", the legislature defined it. It wasn't a "here is the bill, and the law that will go with it" kind of thing, it was more or less an opinion poll "are you for smoking or against it", people voted that they were against it, and then they tried to fit a law to it, if that makes sense.

Don't get me wrong - it was on the ballot, and people voted with their interests at heart. As they should.

My problem with it is it has now become "gov't. telling business what it can allow and what it can't allow". It's taking the right of a business person to determine what he/she wants and handing it to the gov't.. If we were talking about an illegal substance, that's fine. We are talking about a product sold in every gas station in the state, and taxed heavily by the state - we are talking about a legal product being banned.

Seems to me, the legislature is saying "we want it both ways". "we want to ban it, so we get more votes, but we want to allow it, so we get more money".

Now, someone can argue and say it's for the public good, and it is. However, what else will be banned for the "public good"? That's my point.

Brownsgirl #104828 05/25/07 04:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Quote:

I wish PA would do this. I'd totally vote for a ban on smoking in all bars and restaurants! But then again, we still have the steelers and eagles fans and that's way worse!!!!!



Well in that case, smoke would be welcome to kill the smell... Nothing worse after a night out than waking up smelling of Steeler fans.


yebat' Putin
JulesDawg #104829 05/25/07 05:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,227
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,227
I agree and disagree with the smoking ban to different extents. I can completely understand the ban for restaurants and other public places where smoking isn't part of the big picture. People go to restaurants to eat. Families and little children, without a smoking ban, end up in the "non-smoking section" (which pretty much means smoke, but not as concentrated) and put their health at risk. To me, if you're at a restaurant, it's a reasonable request to have people go outside to smoke. I respect giving people "choices" but... how many restaurants are going to choose banning smoking when it means they'll lose business? How many smokers are going to choose to be courteous and walk outside when they want a smoke? Bottom line is, they're the exception rather than the rule. For restaurants and other public places that little ones and people in fragile health frequent, I agree with the ban.

Now... for bars, I can't understand it. People go to bars to relax, get comforable and have a good time. Part of that (for smokers) is to be able to light one up indoors without having to walk outside every time. Removing smoking from bars, IMO, is taking away the essential function of their business - to make bar hoppers as comfortable as possible. There's an expectation that bars will have smoke and, if one wants to avoid it, it's entirely reasonable to ask them to find a smoke-free bar or just avoid the scene altogether. Banning smoking is be like banning drinking - people come to bars for their vices, taking them away makes little sense.

All that said, I'm a non-smoker and I enjoy being able to go anywhere without breathing it in, but I don't think it's fair in places where the ability to smoke is a very reasonable expectation.

Spectre #104830 05/25/07 06:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
Y
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Y
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,032
What's wrong with sitting and relaxing outside and having a smoke?


#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9,149
I think the real issue here is not so much whether a business' "right" to do business the way it would like it is being "violated," or "eroded," but rather that the bottom line is being affected,.... isn't that what's really ticking the bar owners off,...??

Does a bar owner really care about whether or not you can smoke in his bar, or his he REALLY more concerned with how much money you spend there,...??

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Quote:

Quote:

Ok, this may sound dumb but is it really a gov't issue? I thought the PEOPLE of Ohio voted on it. If that's the case then how is the gov't telling people they can't smoke???? Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.




First of all, the people voted on something that wasn't defined, and after passage of "the unknown", the legislature defined it. It wasn't a "here is the bill, and the law that will go with it" kind of thing, it was more or less an opinion poll "are you for smoking or against it", people voted that they were against it, and then they tried to fit a law to it, if that makes sense.

Don't get me wrong - it was on the ballot, and people voted with their interests at heart. As they should.

My problem with it is it has now become "gov't. telling business what it can allow and what it can't allow". It's taking the right of a business person to determine what he/she wants and handing it to the gov't.. If we were talking about an illegal substance, that's fine. We are talking about a product sold in every gas station in the state, and taxed heavily by the state - we are talking about a legal product being banned.

Seems to me, the legislature is saying "we want it both ways". "we want to ban it, so we get more votes, but we want to allow it, so we get more money".

Now, someone can argue and say it's for the public good, and it is. However, what else will be banned for the "public good"? That's my point.




The part that was undefined was enforcement ...... not the smoking ban itself.

People knew exactly what they were voting for. I haven't heard any great public outcry bemoaning some underhanded tactics on behalf of "Smokefree Ohio".


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,126
S
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
S
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,126
Maybe you can tell me how voting away our rights is a good thing...

As was stated earlier in the thread, it is not as much about the smoking ban as it is about losing rights. A very slippery slope we are going down.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405
I
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
I
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405
Quote:

Does a bar owner really care about whether or not you can smoke in his bar, or his he REALLY more concerned with how much money you spend there,...??




Is this some revelation? Of course for a bar owner its bottome line. How many successful smokeless bars do you know of prior to this law?

AS for the people, its a right stolen by a bunch of whiners who now that they have the smokeless bar, don't frequent them.


"My signature line goes here."
Squires #104835 05/25/07 11:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Quote:

Maybe you can tell me how voting away our rights is a good thing...

As was stated earlier in the thread, it is not as much about the smoking ban as it is about losing rights. A very slippery slope we are going down.




It's not giving away a single one of my rights ...... unless you consider returning from a night out stinking like smoke as a "right".

The people decided that the 80% of people who don't smoke shouldn't be subjected to indoor smoke by the 20% who do. BFD. I think that peeing and crapping in a public pool should also not be allowed. Oh wait ...... saying that might be giving away a right too .......


There is a differece between privledge and right. Smoking in public places was a privledge ... it was never a right.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

It's not giving away a single one of my rights ......




You don't own a bar, do you?

IRE 45 #104837 05/25/07 11:35 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288
W
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,288
Quote:

You my freind are FOS ! 20 % my arse .




I very well may be FOS...but, like I posted...at the VFW where I had beers on Thursday night, 2 of 10 people were smoking. That's 20%.

Quote:

You wanna play with numbers come to my bar and ask the same question. When I said 95% of my patrons smoke that is what I meant .




I have no problem believing you.

Quote:

I can only pray that sometime ,someone will pass a law that will seriously curtail your income .




You would pray for that, eh? Well, I'll be praying that you do not have to suffer and that your business turns around and is even more successful than before the ban. But that's just me.

Quote:

Then I hope that you face the possibility of losing everything you worked for. I hope you stay awake nights feeling that your slice of the American Dream was being taken away by dumbass people without a clue. I hope that your wife will be sick with worry about things to come. I hope that the same government forces you to become a criminal in order to survive in an already tight feild.




Same as above.

Quote:

You don't want smoke then keep your whinny ass out of places where smoke is present.




Did I ever say that I didn't want smoke? As I stated, I voted as I did for the benefit of others. How do you know whether I personally like smoke or not?

Quote:

I'll bet you are the kind of person who has already filed numerous complaints with the state ?




How much would you like to lose? er... I mean bet. Because you will lose every one of those hard earned dollars.

Quote:

As far as employees enduring smoke...don't freakin work there. I don't like heights which is why I am not a damn window washer . Don't like blood so I am not in the medical field . Hate numbers so I reckon a career in accounting is not for me . Satrting to get the picture ?




I was waiting for that one. Don't freakin work there. Classic.

Quote:

A law is a law and this has been passed so we all have to deal with it but what we don't need is some ninnies trying to justify why they voted the way they did and how it will be better for us in the long run.




Well...this is a message board and opinions are passed around on here. I do not have to justify any vote I place.

Quote:

Do yourself a favor and stay away from those nasty bars but if you can't I would suggest keeping quiet about this smoking ban nonsense in front of smokers because you just may get your feelings hurt.




Keep quiet about a law passed by a ridiculously overwhelming majority? Nah. Thanks for the advice though.

I_Rogue #104838 05/25/07 11:35 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Definition: Whining

Whining is crying for 2 years after getting ass kicked in the democratic American voting process because a majority of people don't want to breathe smoke that shortens their lives. There was no mistake about what people were voting for.


SaintDawg™

Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
IRE 45 #104839 05/25/07 11:39 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

When I said 95% of my patrons smoke that is what I meant




You know, IRE, I agree with you 100% on this situation, and we could argue what it means or what precedents it sets or why it's not a good road to go down...

...but at the end of the day, the REAL problem is...of that 95% of your clientele who smokes, how many of them do you think went out and voted that day?

SaintDawg #104840 05/25/07 11:49 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405
I
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
I
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405
Quote:

Definition: Whining

Whining is crying for 2 years after getting ass kicked in the democratic American voting process because a majority of people don't want to breathe smoke that shortens their lives. There was no mistake about what people were voting for.




This is the big bunch of BS. I can tell you first hand. First I AM A NON SMOKER. I go to bars. My girlfriend is a bar-tender of 18 years. The non-smokers ARE NOT going out to the bars. PERIOD Its showing on many of my friend's, who own bars', bottom line. The people who voted for this want their one time out in a resteraunt smoke free. No big deal. They want their one time out a month for their one glass of diet coke, smoke free.

Go have your diet coke at a Dairy Queen and quit dictating what a private owner can do witht their property. If this is so wanted,you should have opened your gold mind of smokeless bar chains.


"My signature line goes here."
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,126
S
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
S
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,126
I guess we'll see if you are singing the same tune when a privledge you value is banned. It's only a matter of time.

Like I said, it is not about smoking, it is about the freedom of choice.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

The people decided that the 80% of people who don't smoke




This is a bunk statistic.

You know how I'm always crowing on here about actually taking the time to read into things to see for yourself? I'm usually talking aobut Iraq, but it works for all facets of life...this 80% stat came from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guess where they got their information from?

What individuals reported to their health insurance provider.

Not to mention, to be qualified as a 'smoker' you had to fit the criteria of one who smokes everyday...which discludes a lot of smokers I know.

PDR #104843 05/26/07 12:03 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405
I
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
I
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,405
The final result was 64-36%. Where is the 80% coming from. I do know that around 2 out of every 3 people I know are idiots, so this result doesn't surprise me.


"My signature line goes here."
I_Rogue #104844 05/26/07 12:06 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Tough kibbles and bits dawg. The people voted and thats that!

Waaahhhh...


SaintDawg™

Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
PDR #104845 05/26/07 01:10 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Quote:

Quote:

The people decided that the 80% of people who don't smoke




This is a bunk statistic.

You know how I'm always crowing on here about actually taking the time to read into things to see for yourself? I'm usually talking aobut Iraq, but it works for all facets of life...this 80% stat came from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guess where they got their information from?

What individuals reported to their health insurance provider.

Not to mention, to be qualified as a 'smoker' you had to fit the criteria of one who smokes everyday...which discludes a lot of smokers I know.




So you have a more solid statistic? Please .. do share.

Somehow, however, I suspect that you don't.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
SaintDawg #104846 05/26/07 06:58 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Quote:

LMFAO.. What bar do you go to that you have to settle your bill before you go outside to smoke?




ANY bar where the bartender does not know you from Adam.

Quote:

If they have your card what do they care if you step outside for a conference with The Marlboro Man?




1st I don't even have a credit card. If I can't pay cash I don't buy it.

2nd Why would I hand over a credit card to a stranger and leave it with them



Quote:

All the bars I know of, you leave your card and your tab with the beermaid, and when you want a smoke.. umm.. you signal the beermaid (Ah'll be back) and you leave your beer on the bar right where you are sitting.. and you go smoke.. then you come back.. all is well. Simple stuff...




NOT simple stuff, I know of three people who had their drinks spiked while they left them on the bar and walked away, hell I won't even leave a beer sit on the bar while I go pee.

Quote:

Whats even sillier.. if you leave your seat to go pee.. you have to settle up? LMAO..




Nope because the person I am with is still sitting at the bar.

Quote:

You're going to the wrong places. Pfft.. crowded bars.. I like to walk in and by the time I get to an empty seat at the bar.. my beer is already waiting for me and the beermaid is calling me by name and saying hello to me.




Thats the kind of places I like also, but when your wife likes to go to new places, not the same old ones, and try out different meals thats not an option all the time.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
jcbrowns #104847 05/26/07 07:04 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,365
Quote:

I'm a smoker and I agree with the restaurant thing. If you can't go in and eat for an hour without a cig, there is something wrong with you.




But who wants to be rushed in, and rushed out? When we go out for Diner my wife and I like to sit and have a few drinks while we relax and talk. Then appit. and more drinks, then the meal, then relax have a few more and talk. We can kill four hours easy, and for smokers (while drinking) there is no way to enjoy yourself going four hours smoke free.


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Quote:

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and I feel that even though the government did not impose this law on us they have the ability to make it right and are not doing so.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The governmen t cannot amend the State Constitution, neither can it ignore it, nor modify it by itself.

The was a Constitutional amendment, and it can only be changed by a vote of the people.




I understand that completely, as that is 6th grade government class stuff....

It is ridiculous that issues such as this appear on the ballot in such a convoluted manner, one shouldn't have to read it over and over to see what the underlying parts are. THIS is how our govt, can fix the problem, by creating standards so that people can know what they are voting on.

You and Saint keep expounding on the "fact" that people did know what they were voting on, and I say that is a bunch of horse kaka. I have talked to dozens of people who have in turn talked to dozens of people at various posts, and this is a VERY common denominator across the state.

And if the issue was so clear, then why did it get bounced around for months (don't tell me the enforcement issue, I'm well aware of that) in court? I'm talking about the law itself.....it was a poorly written amendment when it went on the ballot, and it should be put up for repeal until which time they get it straight.

This will do nothing but cost the state more money, due to having to enforce a silly law. Tax revenues will be down, businesses may fail....

Way to go Ohio!

FloridaFan #104849 05/26/07 07:45 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Quote:

Believe it or not, and I'm speaking from experience, the public will adjust to the new rules, and it will be business as usual, and in many cases, more business.

Smokers don't goto the bar to smoke, they go to sit, have conversation, and drink. Smoking is just a secondary thing, in a couple months they won't give it much thought to step out back every 15-20 mins and have a smoke,




You're speaking from Florida experience.....this is Ohio. The weather patterns can be just a taaaaaaaaaaad different at times, ya know.

Let's do an update a year from now if this silly-assed law stays in effect. (unless we are all bankrupt from paying 4 bucks a gallon for gas and can't afford internet access next year) But that's another thread....

shepdawg #104850 05/26/07 09:06 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955
General response to those who wonder why it's a big deal to step outside....

I throw darts. When I want to step outside, I have to pack up my darts (NOT leaving them unattended), grab my purse, and risk losing my dartboard while I'm gone. This in not even close to acceptable for me. It's why I'm not going to the bar very often now. I happen to know a dozen dart & pool players that feel the same way. It's just a PITA to go out anymore.

Oh well....when the bar closes and I lose yet another place to throw I'll probably just give up the game. Darts isn't like pool...usually a pool table in every bar. Dart boards are few and far between around Dayton.


#gmstrong #gmlapdance
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,681
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,681
Copenhagen.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Ballpeen #104852 05/26/07 09:19 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,747
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,747
Quote:

Copenhagen.



Disgusting.


[b]USNavyDawg (Ret.)
[Linked Image from i87.photobucket.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 858
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 858
The smoking ban hasn't hurt our bar biz or the bar next door. We've been packed. I notice very few people going outside to smoke. Maybe 3-4 a night.

Chelle maybe try a little pinch between cheeck & gum

I remember dart league nights being a huge night at neighborhood bars. The problem is not the smoking but the chain bars have killed the mom & pop bars. The chain bars have Corn Hole Leagues. I guess its safer

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,577
I guess those are legitimate gripes. I don't have to deal with those things at the bars I go to since the bartenders and the regulars know what belongs to who and if someone should try to grab them and walk off someone will say something.

I haven't noticed any falling off of business at either place.. both places have fenced in beer / smoking patio's out back / up front. Both have cable tv hookups and a TV's so you don't miss one lil bit of the game. Matter of fact, I think business has never been better at each place. I'll go to the Owner and the managers and ask them if they have lost any bidness since the ban.

I've never worried one bit about my drink getting spiked LOL.. guess I'm not the sort people want to "take advantage of" LOL...Middle aged broken down guys don't have to worry bout that.

Best thing to do all around is to quit.. it's cheaper, you'll live longer, the people that love you and care about you will have you around longer AND you increase your chances of seeing a Cleveland Browns Super Bowl!


SaintDawg™

Football, baseball, basketball, wine, women, walleye
SaintDawg #104855 05/26/07 09:26 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955
Quote:

I guess those are legitimate gripes. I don't have to deal with those things at the bars I go to since the bartenders and the regulars know what belongs to who and if someone should try to grab them and walk off someone will say something.




They know us at this bar, but the problem is the dart area is not in a place the bartenders can watch very well. From the bar they can't even see the tables back there.

Quote:

I've never worried one bit about my drink getting spiked LOL.. guess I'm not the sort people want to "take advantage of" LOL...Middle aged broken down guys don't have to worry bout that.




I take my beer with me if I leave the dart area to socialize or go to the jukebox. Not because I worry about it being spiked, but so I can drink it and get another while I'm up.

Quote:

Best thing to do all around is to quit.. it's cheaper, you'll live longer, the people that love you and care about you will have you around longer AND you increase your chances of seeing a Cleveland Browns Super Bowl!




Of course. However, that would only solve my issues. Not the issues of other people.


#gmstrong #gmlapdance
I_Rogue #104856 05/26/07 09:45 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 473
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 473
Quote:


Is this some revelation? Of course for a bar owner its bottome line. How many successful smokeless bars do you know of prior to this law?




How about the bars in NYC? People there seem to adapt just fine, why is Ohio so frigging backwards?


[Linked Image from i6.photobucket.com]
shepdawg #104857 05/26/07 09:45 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,671
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,671
"...And if the issue was so clear, then why did it get bounced around for months (don't tell me the enforcement issue, I'm well aware of that) in court? I'm talking about the law itself.....it was a poorly written amendment when it went on the ballot, and it should be put up for repeal until which time they get it straight."

Shep... was the law written for only legaleze speakers? Or was it maybe written in English spoken by thoughful and well versed persons such as those who wrote the United States Constitution?

Often times some readers [all present company excluded of course] do not have the mental capacity or accuity to focus on more than one thought line at a time.


The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, .
Ralphie #104858 05/26/07 10:26 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,507
The issue wasn't all that damn difficult to understand.

The best enforcement mechanism was left to be determined by the agency doing the enforcing.

http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/ElectionsVoter/results2006.aspx?Section=1874

State Issue 5: Text of Proposed Law


Be it Enacted by the People of the State of Ohio.

Section 1.

3794.01 Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

(A) “Smoking” means inhaling, exhaling, burning, or carrying any lighted cigar, cigarette, pipe, or other lighted smoking device for burning tobacco or any other plant. “Smoking” does not include the burning of incense in a religious ceremony.

(B) “Public place” means an enclosed area to which the public is invited or in which the public is permitted and that is not a private residence.

(C) “Place of employment” means an enclosed area under the direct or indirect control of an employer that the employer's employees use for work or any other purpose, including but not limited to, offices, meeting rooms, sales, production and storage areas, restrooms, stairways, hallways, warehouses, garages, and vehicles. An enclosed area as described herein is a place of employment without regard to the time of day or the presence of employees.

(D) “Employee” means a person who is employed by an employer, or who contracts with an employer or third person to perform services for an employer, or who otherwise performs services for an employer for compensation or for no compensation.

(E) “Employer” means the state or any individual, business, association, political subdivision, or other public or private entity, including a nonprofit entity, that employs or contracts for or accepts the provision of services from one or more employees.

(F) “Enclosed Area” means an area with a roof or other overhead covering of any kind and walls or side coverings of any kind, regardless of the presence of openings for ingress and egress, on all sides or on all sides but one.

(G) “Proprietor” means an employer, owner, manager, operator, liquor permit holder, or person in charge or control of a public place or place of employment.

(H) “Retail tobacco store” means a retail establishment that derives more than eighty percent of its gross revenue from the sale of cigars, cigarettes, pipes, or other smoking devices for burning tobacco and related smoking accessories and in which the sale of other products is merely incidental. “Retail tobacco store” does not include a tobacco department or section of a larger commercial establishment or of any establishment with a liquor permit or of any restaurant.

(I) “Outdoor patio” means an area that is either: enclosed by a roof or other overhead covering and walls or side coverings on not more than two sides; or has no roof or other overhead covering regardless of the number of walls or other side coverings.

3794.02 Smoking Prohibitions.

(A) No proprietor of a public place or place of employment, except as permitted in section 3794.03 of this chapter, shall permit smoking in the public place or place of employment or in the areas directly or indirectly under the control of the proprietor immediately adjacent to locations of ingress or egress to the public place or place of employment.

(B) A proprietor of a public place or place of employment shall ensure that tobacco smoke does not enter any area in which smoking is prohibited under this chapter through entrances, windows, ventilation systems, or other means.

(C) No person or employer shall discharge, refuse to hire, or in any manner retaliate against an individual for exercising any right, including reporting a violation, or performing any obligation under this chapter.

(D) No person shall refuse to immediately discontinue smoking in a public place, place of employment, or establishment, facility or outdoor area declared nonsmoking under section 3794.05 of this chapter when requested to do so by the proprietor or any employee of an employer of the public place, place of employment or establishment, facility or outdoor area.

(E) Lack of intent to violate a provision of this chapter shall not be a defense to a violation.

3794.03 Areas where smoking is not regulated by this chapter.

The following shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter:

(A) Private residences, except during the hours of operation as a child care or adult care facility for compensation, during the hours of operation as a business by a person other than a person residing in the private residence, or during the hours of operation as a business, when employees of the business, who are not residents of the private residence or are not related to the owner, are present.

(B) Rooms for sleeping in hotels, motels and other lodging facilities designated as smoking rooms; provided, however, that not more than twenty percent of sleeping rooms may be so designated.

(C) Family-owned and operated places of employment in which all employees are related to the owner, but only if the enclosed areas of the place of employment are not open to the public, are in a free standing structure occupied solely by the place of employment, and smoke from the place of employment does not migrate into an enclosed area where smoking is prohibited under the provisions of this chapter.

(D) Any nursing home, as defined in section 3721.10(A) of the Revised Code, but only to the extent necessary to comply with section 3721.13(A)(18) of the Revised Code. If indoor smoking area is provided by a nursing home for residents of the nursing home, the designated indoor smoking area shall be separately enclosed and separately ventilated so that tobacco smoke does not enter, through entrances, windows, ventilation systems, or other means, any areas where smoking is otherwise prohibited under this chapter. Only residents of the nursing home may utilize the designated indoor smoking area for smoking. A nursing home may designate specific times when the indoor smoking area may be used for such purpose. No employee of a nursing shall be required to accompany a resident into a designated indoor smoking area or perform services in such area when being used for smoking.

(E) Retail tobacco stores as defined in section 3794.01(H) of this chapter in operation prior to the effective date of this section. The retail tobacco store shall annually file with the department of health by January thirty first an affidavit stating the percentage of its gross income during the prior calendar year that was derived from the sale of cigars, cigarettes, pipes, or other smoking devices for smoking tobacco and related smoking accessories. Any retail tobacco store that begins operation after the effective date of this section or any existing retail tobacco store that relocates to another location after the effective date of this section may only qualify for this exemption if located in a freestanding structure occupied solely by the business and smoke from the business does not migrate into an enclosed area where smoking is prohibited under the provisions of this chapter.

(F) Outdoor patios as defined in Section 3794.01(I) of this chapter. All outdoor patios shall be physically separated from an enclosed area. If windows or doors form any part of the partition between an enclosed area and the outdoor patio, the openings shall be closed to prevent the migration of smoke into the enclosed area. If windows or doors do not prevent the migration of smoke into the enclosed area, the outdoor patio shall be considered an extension of the enclosed area and subject to the prohibitions of this chapter.

(G) Private clubs as defined in section 4301.01(B)(13) of the Revised Code, provided all of the following apply: the club has no employees; the club is organized as a not for profit entity; only members of the club are present in the club's building; no persons under the age of eighteen are present in the club's building; the club is located in a freestanding structure occupied solely by the club; smoke from the club does not migrate into an enclosed area where smoking is prohibited under the provisions of this chapter; and, if the club serves alcohol, it holds a valid D4 liquor permit.

3794.04 Construction; other applicable laws.

Because medical studies have conclusively shown that exposure to secondhand smoke from tobacco causes illness and disease, including lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory illness, smoking in the workplace is a statewide concern and, therefore, it is in the best interests of public health that smoking of tobacco products be prohibited in public places and places of employment and that there be a uniform statewide minimum standard to protect workers and the public from the health hazards associated with exposure to secondhand smoke from tobacco.

The provisions of this chapter shall be liberally construed so as to further its purposes of protecting public health and the health of employees and shall prevail over any less restrictive state or local laws or regulations. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit smoking where it is otherwise restricted by other laws or regulations.

3794.05 Declaration of establishment as nonsmoking.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the owner, manager, operator, or other person in charge or control of an establishment, facility, or outdoor area which does not otherwise qualify as a public place or place of employment may declare such establishment, facility, or outdoor area as a nonsmoking place. Smoking shall be prohibited in any place declared nonsmoking under this section where a sign conforming to the requirements of section 3794.06 is posted.

3794.06 Posting of signs; prohibition of ashtrays; responsibilities of proprietors.

In addition to the prohibitions contained in section 3794.02 of this chapter, the proprietor of a public place or place of employment shall comply with the following requirements:

(A) “No Smoking” signs or the international “No Smoking” symbol (consisting of a pictorial representation of a burning cigarette enclosed in a red circle with a red bar across it) shall be conspicuously posted in every public place and place of employment where smoking is prohibited by this chapter, including at each entrance to the public place or place of employment. Signs shall be of sufficient size to be clearly legible to a person of normal vision throughout the areas they are intended to mark. All signs shall contain a telephone number for reporting violations.

(B) All ashtrays and other receptacles used for disposing of smoking materials shall be removed from any area where smoking is prohibited by this chapter.

3794.07 Duties of the Department of Health.

This chapter shall be enforced by the department of health and its designees. The director of health shall within six months of the effective date of this section:

(A) Promulgate rules in accordance with Chapter 119 of the Revised Code to implement and enforce all provisions of this chapter;

(B) Promulgate rules in accordance with Chapter 119 of the Revised Code to prescribe a schedule of fines for violations of this chapter designed to foster compliance with the provisions of this chapter. The amount of a fine for a violation of 3794.02 (A) and (B) shall not be less than one hundred dollars and the maximum for a violation shall be twenty five hundred dollars. The amount of a fine for a violation of 3794.02 (D) shall be up to a maximum of one hundred dollars per violation. Each day of a violation shall constitute a separate violation. The schedule of fines that apply to a proprietor shall be progressive based on the number of prior violations by the proprietor. Violations which occurred more than two years prior to a subsequent violation shall not be considered if there has been no finding of a violation in the intervening time period. The fine schedule shall set forth specific factors that may be considered to decrease or waive the amount of a fine that otherwise would apply. Fines shall be doubled for intentional violations;

(C) Promulgate rules in accordance with Chapter 119 of the Revised Code to prescribe a procedure for providing a proprietor or individual written notice of a report of a violation and the opportunity to present in writing any statement or evidence to contest the report, and prescribing procedures for making findings whether a proprietor or individual violated a provision of this chapter and for imposing fines for violations;

(D) Establish a system for receiving reports of violations of the provisions of this chapter from any member of the public, including, but not limited to, by mail and one or more e-mail addresses and toll free telephone numbers exclusively for such purpose. A person shall not be required to disclose his or her identity in order to report a violation;

(E) Inform proprietors of public places and places of employment of the requirements of this chapter and how to comply with its provisions, including, but not limited to, by providing printed and other materials and a toll free telephone number and e-mail address exclusively for such purposes; and

(F) Design and implement a program to educate the public regarding the provisions of this chapter, including, but not limited to, through the establishment of an internet website and how a violation may be reported.

3794.08 Smoke Free Indoor Air Fund.

There is hereby created in the state treasury the smoke free indoor air fund. All fines collected pursuant to this chapter and any grant, contribution, or other moneys received by the department of health for the purposes of this chapter shall be credited to the smoke free indoor air fund and used solely for the purposes of this chapter.

3794.09 Enforcement; Penalties.

(A) Upon the receipt of a first report that a proprietor of a public place or place of employment or an individual has violated any provision of this chapter, the department of health or its designee shall investigate the report and, if it concludes that there was a violation, issue a warning letter to the proprietor or individual.

(B) Upon a report of a second or subsequent violation of any provision of this chapter by a proprietor of a public place or place of employment or an individual, the department of health or its designee shall investigate the report. If the director of health or director's designee concludes, based on all of the information before him or her, that there was a violation, he or she shall impose a civil fine upon the proprietor or individual in accordance with the schedule of fines required to be promulgated under section 3794.07 of this chapter.

(C) Any proprietor or individual against whom a finding of a violation is made under this chapter may appeal the finding to the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. Such appeal shall be governed by the provisions of section 119.12 of the Revised Code.

(D) The director of health may institute an action in the court of common pleas seeking an order in equity against a proprietor or individual that has repeatedly violated the provisions of this chapter or fails to comply with its provisions.

Section 2. Severability.

If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall be held invalid by a court, that invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this chapter that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are declared to be severable.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
A
Legend
Online
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,826
Quote:


The part that was undefined was enforcement ...... not the smoking ban itself.

People knew exactly what they were voting for. I haven't heard any great public outcry bemoaning some underhanded tactics on behalf of "Smokefree Ohio".




I don't think people DID know exactly what the were voting for, as evidenced by this article. They were told they were voting for a ban, except in private clubs, etc, and then a judge changed all that, which is why the STATE of Ohio is appealing it.
http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll...=73282238842583

Also, to whoever said it passed by 80%, or 64%, this article lists it at 58% for the ban, 42% against. Democracy, yes, but when what people are told they are voting on changes after the vote, it doesn't seem quite right.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 858
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 858
Quote:

but when what people are told they are voting on changes after the vote, it doesn't seem quite right.




Then you do what Browns fans do... Throw bottles

I knew what I was voting for. I don't see the big deal. Why do you want others to smell like smoke and die? One of the reasons smoking was banned in prison years ago was because of the lawsuits by non-smoking prisoners..

Ozzy Osbourne said " smoking is the nastiest thing a human can do"

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Thanks for posting the entire amendment that I've already read a gazillion times.....

Check out the section on private clubs. Our American Legion post is a "private" club, with exclusive membership criteria. We do have employees, but these same employees are also members. So how would you construe this amendment to affect us if you were standing at the poll trying to decide which way to go? I as well as several others took it to mean that we would be exempt from the law......and the very fact that it has been through the courts with them trying to determine the applicability CLEARLY SHOWS that it was a raw deal.

People DID NOT know what they were voting on....I would wager that if it were on the ballot again with people knowing what they know now, it would FAIL MISERABLY.

Ralphie #104862 05/26/07 11:39 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Quote:

Shep... was the law written for only legaleze speakers? Or was it maybe written in English spoken by thoughful and well versed persons such as those who wrote the United States Constitution?

Often times some readers [all present company excluded of course] do not have the mental capacity or accuity to focus on more than one thought line at a time.



I understand that amendments such as this one have to be written in legalese to be able to be enacted/enforced/efficient.

However, we see it time and time again during election time the special interest groups have these things written so they are intentionally misleading, and we have to endure the commercials from each side pro and con telling us what the real issue is all about. Many people don't know who/what to believe....and it isn't always a matter of just reading it thoroughly beforehand.

I can honestly say that I know for a fact that there are several people who HAD NO IDEA what they were voting for.....now extrapolate that across the state.

Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Smoking Ban

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5