|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,739
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,739 |
Osweller...I don't understand it...I watch this kid and I think he OK at best. Has back up written all over him. Am I missing something? jmho EO...with Manziel more than likely out with his bonehead antics...With McCown having 2016 as his last contract year. I think everyone knows QB needs upgraded...If Osweiler was in this year's draft he'd be an easy top 20 ...unfortunately he came out during the Luck and RG3 draft...However in those 4 years he has absorbed so much information from being behind the wings of Peyton Manning...and was never thrown to the wolves. Has a cannon for an arm, still very young (25) can see over any pocket,solid accuracy... However can improve his awareness and accuracy...I just feel he is just as good as Goff or Lunch...is only like 2-3 hears older then them, while having 4 years of NFL experience ...
Last edited by tru_dawgs; 01/23/16 11:49 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101 |
Osweller...I don't understand it...I watch this kid and I think he OK at best. Has back up written all over him. Am I missing something? jmho EO...with Manziel more than likely out with his bonehead antics...With McCown having 2016 as his last contract year. I think everyone knows QB needs upgraded...If Osweiler was in this year's draft he'd be an easy top 20 ...unfortunately he came out during the Luck and RG3 draft...However in those 4 years he has absorbed so much information from being behind the wings of Peyton Manning...and was never thrown to the wolves. Has a cannon for an arm, still very young (25) can see over any pocket,solid accuracy... However can improve his awareness and accuracy...I just feel he is just as good as Goff or Lunch...is only like 2-3 hears older then them, while having 4 years of NFL experience ... This is why I believe the Broncos will not be letting Osweiler get away. Nor do I think Cousins is really available. The state of the QB position in the NFL, although officially FA, these guys will most likely be retained by their respective teams.
1. #GMstrong 2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb 3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa 4. ClemenZa #1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
yeah he came out in the Luck RG3 class.
Too bad he couldn't impress more than WEEDEN not Luck nor RG3 but WEEDEN!
Big arm yes...that is where it stopped for me. Maybe he had some good games that I missed. I'd rather have that Lynch kid they compare him to.
I just don't see him in the class of Championship or Franchise QB and he's going into his 5th season. If he's going to arrive - he should have done so by now.
Don't want Back ups here. jmho
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101 |
My plan for the off-season. First and foremost, convince the players we have who can leave to stay, specifically Mack, Schwartz, Benjamin, and Gibson. Go hard after Malik Jackson in FA. If can't land him, the next best edge rusher available. I love the idea of drafting Bosa, but if we do there seems little chance of getting our choice of QB. If we can address the pass rush in FA, the need for Bosa diminishes compared to getting a QB. Then determine which of the QB prospects is most likely to answer our need and get him with the 2nd pick.
Like I said, I love the idea of drafting Bosa, but if we do, we better be convinced Hackenberg is the answer at QB.
1. #GMstrong 2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb 3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa 4. ClemenZa #1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,337
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,337 |
Hackenberg is not the answer. He deals poorly with adversity. We can't seem to avoid some kind of issue every season.
I was on the Bosa wagon for awhile, but I'm starting to lean toward Goff/Wentz. With all the talks about QBs I've been thinking about what it takes to be successful at the position, and my confidence in Johnny ever reaching his full potential is waning. If you look at Manning and Brady the one common denominator is they put in the work. Personal QB coaches in the offseasons, trying to get every detail exactly right on every play, always trying to improve- that doesn't seem to be JM.
Goff and Wentz seem to have that grinder mentality. I'll be keeping an eye on both of them during the build up to the draft.
![[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]](https://i.ibb.co/fkjZc8B/Bull-Dawg-Sig-smaller.jpg) You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns. Fiercely Independent.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Mock Offseason:
Estimated Cap Room with Carryover: $39.18 Million
Opt Out: Alex Mack (+$8 Million)
Cut: Dwayne Bowe (+$3.4 Million) Paul Kruger (+$5.3 Million) Randy Starks (+$3 Million) Johnny Manziel (-$2.4 Million) Jim Dray (+$1.8 Million) Pierre Desir (+$0.5 Million)
Cap Space after Cuts/Opt-Out: ~$58.8 Million
Re-sign Expiring Contracts Mitchell Schwartz: 5 years, $32 Million ($8 Million cap hit first year) Austin Pasztor: 2nd Round RFA Qualifying Offer (~$2.5 Million) Darrian Miller: ERFA 1 year minimum salary (no cap implications)
Let Walk - expected to sign non-minimum deals Tashaun Gipson Travis Benjamin Craig Robertson
That means likely no comp picks for 2017. However, we already have Indy's 2017 6th for Billy Winn IIRC.
Cap Space After Re-signing Players: $48.3 Million
Free Agency: RB Chris Ivory 4 years, $30 million ($9 million first year) FB Darrel Young 3 years, $7.5 million ($3.5 million first year) NT Damon Harrison 5 years, $50 million ($12 million first year)
Cap Space after Signings: $23.8 Million
For the Draft, I'm going to let myself dream and use CBS' rankings to say when players will be available. We trade #2 for #4, #34, and 2017 2nd round pick to Dallas, who selects Jared Goff.
Draft: 4. WR Laquon Treadwell, Ole Miss 32. OLB Noah Spence, Eastern Kentucky 34. WR Josh Doctson, TCU 65. OLB Victor Ochi, Stony Brook 110. QB Dak Prescott, Miss St 137. FS Trevon Stewart, Houston 139. CB Cyrus Jones, Alabama 172. DE Anthony Zettel, Penn State 174. ILB Cassanova McKinzy, Auburn 180. WR Nelson Spruce, Colorado 221. ILB Beniquez Brown, Miss St
Final Projected 53-man Roster
Offense: 24 QB: McCown, Prescott, Davis RB: Ivory, Crowell, Johnson FB: Young WX: Gordon, Doctson WZ: Treadwell, Hartline WY: Hawkins, Spruce TE: Barnidge, Bibbs, Telfer LT: Thomas, Miller LG: Bitonio, Pasztor C: Erving, UDFA (Smothers/Huettel) RG: Greco RT: Schwartz
Defense: 25 NT: Harrison, Shelton 3T: Hughes, Zettel 5T: D. Bryant, Cooper SB: A. Bryant, Orchard TB: Dansby, McKinzy MB: Kirksey, Brown WB: Spence, Ochi Ni: Mingo OC: Haden, T. Williams, Jones, Gilbert IC: K. Williams, IEO FS: Stewart, Poyer SS: Whitner, Campbell
Special Teams: 4 K: UDFA (Oberkrom) P: Lee LS: Hughlett ST: Moore
Rookie Pool Estimate: $8 Million
Final Projected Cap Space: $15.8 Million
Future Draft Picks Owned: 2017 DAL 2nd 2017 IND 6th
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
If we had that draft, I'd dance a jig.
FYI from the looks of Schwartz's twitter convos with Banner lately, he seems pretty focused on money. I'm betting he wants to be the highest paid RT and about 7 mil a year. I'm not sure if I'd want to pay that.
I haven't looked at kickers at all. Is Oberkrom any good?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Yeah I think I had him at about $6.5 million. If I had to up that to 5 / $35 then done deal.
I like Oberkrom the past couple seasons. He's got good range. It gets pretty windy in DFW, too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 |
Isn't the Florida State kicker really good?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
Treadwell, Prescott, AND Doctson?
You basically just ruined the real NFL Draft for me.. thanks alot..
Also, as it relates to Dak..
Do you think there's a chance he could start right away?
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
I thin it depends more on the philosophy of the team/coach than on Dak. On our team, I would have to look more at hues history to answer. My guess is he wouldnt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,821
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,821 |
Looks good Steve. I'd be very happy with Dak.
You think he will last to the 4th round? I might have to reach and take him in the 3rd.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
I'm really not sure. I feel like that's a stretch and the only excuse I had for myself was that CBS has him ranked a few picks lower than that. Truthfully I think it's more likely he goes in the second than the fourth. But you never know I guess. If we were able to get that trade and those first three picks in Id be happy to take Prescott at 65 and hope Ochi, CB Sanchez, or ILB Wright made it to that 100 pick.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
I would also be ok with Bosa, Doctson/Thomas, and Dak..
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
I think 2nd too, but until the combine and Pro Days who knows.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,821
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,821 |
I'm really not sure. I feel like that's a stretch and the only excuse I had for myself was that CBS has him ranked a few picks lower than that. Truthfully I think it's more likely he goes in the second than the fourth. But you never know I guess. If we were able to get that trade and those first three picks in Id be happy to take Prescott at 65 and hope Ochi, CB Sanchez, or ILB Wright made it to that 100 pick. Kind of my thinking. I think Cams success will elevate Dak, deserved or not. They are pretty similar in style. Dak might go 2nd round. Heck, a good showing at the Combine and in private workouts, who knows how high he might go? I have my eye on him because I have always liked his game.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
If we had that draft, I'd dance a jig.
FYI from the looks of Schwartz's twitter convos with Banner lately, he seems pretty focused on money. I'm betting he wants to be the highest paid RT and about 7 mil a year. I'm not sure if I'd want to pay that.
I haven't looked at kickers at all. Is Oberkrom any good? Yeck...two WRs in the top 34 picks.
Yeah lets build that exterior with guys who touch the ball around 6-7 times a game. Way to win our division the true black and blue division.
Complete that D front 7 and keep the OL solid. Got to win the LOS battles to succeed in our Division.
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
Are you really saying you want them to spend a 1st or 2nd round pick on another olineman?
Are we EVER allowed to draft a WR?
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263 |
Okay, I'll ask: Why would we spend $50 mil on a NT when we just drafted DS? Don't you think he's gonna come along?
Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180 You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow #GMSTRONG
I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
I was going to ask if here were any talks about what schemes were ganna run.. but screw that..
Can we just put our best players on the field, and let them do what theyre good at? Is that too much to ask?
As long as I never see our best pass rusher covering a slot WR in bump and run.. or 3-4 players subbing out every single play (Sup Shurmur) because of "packages", I'll be somewhat content.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
Are you really saying you want them to spend a 1st or 2nd round pick on another olineman? Are we EVER allowed to draft a WR? I have yet to see a team built by their WRs...wait I have 2 of them. Lions and Falcons.
Jerry Jones was a joke as a drafting GM...all of a sudden he is a genius once he started drafting OL.
Do I want to...look don't know if you have noticed but we might be losing TWO...2 starting OLmen of pretty good caliber. Unfortunately we might NEED TO.
I'm up for upgrades anywhere as long as it makes us a better team.
WRs...as a rule unless there is a WR of the Decade type in the draft - Stay away from them in the TOP 10...especially top 5.
Most dawgs in draft situation consider WR as a position of "NEED" so much so they think we should reach for a WR.
What I'm saying is that the position has so many qualified prospects coming in every year. There is no urgency. We have to do a better job of researching. Its not a rare position - you can get decent in FA. I wanted us to get Marshall not Bowe. Marshall isn't a good WR he's a great WR.
I'm not saying DON't get one at 32...I'm just saying taking one in the top 5 and then another in the early 2nd round is just over kill and not a good investment.
Just take a look at the SB teams. Damrius Thomas in 2010 for the Broncos at #22. I think the only first rounder going to play in the SB...No top 5 or top 10 WRs.
But what I do see is two heck of a good Defenses out there.
What I see is Gordon and a FA added to Benjiman, Hawkins and Hartline. We have a WR corp that will not hold our team back at all. A unit good enough to win a championship... all we need is a championship QB and DEFENSE. Without those two getting the best WR in football history would not get us much closer to a Championship.
That is what I'm saying. Its my opinion and I'm sticking with it.
People think I hate WRs...that I don't like WRs. I want cautious and wise investments. Last year I was all for gettting Sammy Coats as a profitable investment. He really impressed me from the Senior Bowl on...he had a life changing moment and from that moment on he was a different person and it showed in his game.
I liked Blackmon and argued with TRich pimps that if we go impact O that is who we should pick...man we were destined to fail there. I had no clue of his drug problems just went on the film.
I liked Fitzgerald a lot. I did not want Edwards that is for sure at #3.
I almost blew up when I found out the Jets got Marshall (inside of me, I tried to keep those emotions off the board) for almost nothing (what a 5th round pick?
I am saying we have invested 9 impact picks at WR since 1999 and the only one that has a shot of being good is Gordon and after all we went through after next season he might become a FA.
I am saying we have invested 6 Impact picks at OL. Faine we traded, Erving didn't start because we had our OL covered and who knows how he will become. The other 4. Top notch OL who have started DAY ONE. 11 Pro Bowls.
WR is a 2 position field with additions in spread.
OL is a 5 position unit all the time.
WR at its all time best would touch the ball 6-7 times a game. OL is involved in the execution of every Offensive play!
What I'm saying is the LOS in football is so so much more important than the WR position.
What I'm saying is that Gordon broke NFL records two games in a row of over 200 yards Receiving and we lost both.
I've seen us win games when we threw 18 times.
I just don't see WR as a position that turns franchise around.
I never say never as far as investments. Just be wise in the pick cause they come along so often it would be a shame to miss on our pick for one...and yet there we are with 9 impact picks and we missed.
Would I think it is a wise move and good pick if we take the BPA of this draft and he so happens to be a stud OT...I think its a good move to get any LOS O or D that is the BPA. Special at the big guys in a game of football is special.
Am I stuck on that move...no. Actually I say if there is a QB we believe in that has to over ride BPA and we need to take him at #2.
My preference would be maybe that OT move as long as we got a Wilkerson??? (Jets Excellent DT who would be great as a DE in our attack 3/4)
A lot for me has to be what we do in FA...can we assume we will go for one of the 2 FA WR from Bengals?
I don't see to many OTs in FA...most are bandaids and probably way over paid.
jmho
I don't expect you to agree with me. But you make it sound like I'm an idiot for talking OL. Again hello we are going to lose maybe two starters.
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Okay, I'll ask: Why would we spend $50 mil on a NT when we just drafted DS? Don't you think he's gonna come along? Basically because Big Snacks is really good and our run defense has not been. And he's available.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
I will give you credit, arguing FOR OL is a tough position.
The better they are, the less people "notice them"
Do I think adding Gordon to the current crop is a respectable WR Corp? Yes, add a solid FA WR and you have better than average.
But if we are at a pick, and deem a WR worth it, I'm STILL going to take him..
I think we have enough needs, that we can pick whomever the best player available is and it'll work out.. barring the whole QB at 2 thing obviously.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386 |
I will give you credit, arguing FOR OL is a tough position.
The better they are, the less people "notice them"
Do I think adding Gordon to the current crop is a respectable WR Corp? Yes, add a solid FA WR and you have better than average.
But if we are at a pick, and deem a WR worth it, I'm STILL going to take him..
I think we have enough needs, that we can pick whomever the best player available is and it'll work out.. barring the whole QB at 2 thing obviously. Careful, if you go BPA, it's probably an o-lineman.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
I will give you credit, arguing FOR OL is a tough position.
The better they are, the less people "notice them"
Do I think adding Gordon to the current crop is a respectable WR Corp? Yes, add a solid FA WR and you have better than average.
But if we are at a pick, and deem a WR worth it, I'm STILL going to take him..
I think we have enough needs, that we can pick whomever the best player available is and it'll work out.. barring the whole QB at 2 thing obviously. Careful, if you go BPA, it's probably an o-lineman. Man, if you draft "BPA" you're going to draft 7 running backs every year. BPA is a lie.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
Assuming you are the author of the thread and hit quick reply.
Tough position...actually I've always described my self as an OL nut. When I'm not HC almost throughout my coaching career I've been OL coach. OL has always been a passion of mine.
Your last couple of sentences is pretty much what I was saying. If WR is worth it sure as I said I'm all for it.
At #2 BPA just might be OT...not my BPA but most of the NFL world. I doubt very much that a WR will be BPA at #2. But on this board I'm sure we will have more asking for that WR than a OT. I know its not sexy there aren't any high light film...for crying out loud more than half the pancake blocks the refs call a hold on it sometimes automatically. There names get called out only when they do something bad. Its tough. But OL is a very important UNIT and no not all have to be from the first or 2nd round. This is where analytic studies will help. But like anything it comes down to Skill set when talking OT especially LT. That skill set is usually found at the top of the first round.
I just wish for us to build this team better.
jmho
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Better than what? We have 5 top 40 OL picks on the roster today.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
|
OP
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 |
Better than what? We have 5 top 40 OL picks on the roster today. But two MIGHT leave, and one COULD be gone in like 3 YEARS.. So that means we should draft 8 OL this year.. just in case. Oh I forgot someone might get hurt.. make that 10 OL.
Last edited by ThatGuy; 01/27/16 02:40 PM.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
And in the mock you did you have us taking top 5 WR and then top of the 2nd round another. You telling me that is how to build a team Yeah cause its done us wonders so far as far as contributing and sticking with our team. I'll address the rest later, but you must have missed this part of my mock offseason, when the only three players from our team I re-signed were OL, letting Travis Benjamin walk. Re-sign Expiring Contracts Mitchell Schwartz: 5 years, $32 Million ($8 Million cap hit first year) Austin Pasztor: 2nd Round RFA Qualifying Offer (~$2.5 Million) Darrian Miller: ERFA 1 year minimum salary (no cap implications)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475 |
Yeah I see....don't mean to make the scenario silly. Just the fact of an overall #4 and #34 regardless of letting Benjamin walk or not - to me of course a Guy who doesn't value WR obviously the way you do. Its slightly over kill. I could live with #34 WR
jmho
Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off! Go Browns! CHRIST HAS RISEN! GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Okay, I'll ask: Why would we spend $50 mil on a NT when we just drafted DS? Don't you think he's gonna come along? a little more info... http://www.ganggreennation.com/2016/1/13/10765484/pff-damon-harrison-best-run-defender-in-nflPro Football Focus today declared they believe Damon Harrison was the best run defender in the NFL in 2015. Damon Harrison of the @nyjets wins PFF's 2015 Ted Washington Award, which is given to the best run defender in the NFL — Pro Football Focus (@PFF) January 13, 2016 Harrison had a career high 72 tackles this season. It is not a PFF state (sic), but I had Harrison ending the season with 22 "run sacks" according to Pro Football Reference's Play Index. A run sack is a tackle on a run play that results in either no gain or a loss. Those 22 put him second behind JJ Watt in the NFL. I am not sure whether the Jets can afford Harrison. The investments they have made in the defensive line might not make a big contract for him wise. He is likely to get a big contract from a team that is not good against the run and is in need of a nose tackle. He can help that team too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
I was urging for us to try to sign him to an offer sheet last season when he was a restricted free agent given a 2nd round tender. We would have given up our 2nd rounder to the Jets to get him, but we wouldn't have had to spend #12 on Danny Shelton. #12 could have been Devante Parker, who is turning into a very nice receiver for the Dolphins. Oh well.
Last edited by clevesteve; 02/01/16 01:24 PM. Reason: link
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263 |
Okay point made. But didn't Parker have attitude issues, Him and JM would have been a nightmare along with Gilbert.
Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180 You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow #GMSTRONG
I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 447
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 447 |
This is also an exercise in futility when arguments are made based on 2 guys leaving the team. One which has 3 years left on his contract and takes a chance of losing money if he opts out of it.
We could just as easily have this line intact when the draft takes place as some of you arguing being down 2 guys...
Even if we lose one, we have a first round draft pick from 2015 that now has a year under his belt and should see more playing time in 2016. He didn't fair well in 2015, but that was at the guard position in which he not only had never played, but admittedly had never practiced.
Not ready to write off Erving after a couple of games playing at a position he had no business playing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358 |
Actually, it was his mom. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/201...nyah-nyah-nyah/Browns to DeVante Parker’s mom: Nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah Posted by Darin Gantt on May 4, 2015, 6:21 AM EST DeVante Parker AP
New Dolphins wide receiver DeVante Parker was relieved that the Browns decided to pass on him at No. 12.
Or at least his mother was.
“We didn’t want him going to Cleveland,” Raneca Parker told Adam Beasley of the Miami Herald, after the Dolphins took him with the 14th pick. “They don’t have a team, really, or a quarterback. I knew I didn’t want the Cleveland Browns.
“I know the teams the teams he could go to and the teams he couldn’t go to. We were happy with the Miami Dolphins. He was very ecstatic. We’re happy, we love the weather.”
As much as that might sting, the Browns replied, albeit indirectly, that they didn’t like Parker either.
According to Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Browns passed on him because “they felt he wasn’t tough enough and didn’t love the game enough.”
At least DeVante knows his mother loves him and — since he’s a receiver who might need a quarterback some day — has his best interests at heart.
had another article... http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2015/05/devante_parkers_mom_i_knew_i_d.htmlBEREA, Ohio -- Another year, another Louisville player that didn't want to play for Cleveland.
Or at least a player this year who's mom didn't want him to.
DeVante Parker's mom made it clear she didn't want her son playing for the Browns Friday in an interview with the Miami Herald.
"We didn't want him going to Cleveland," Raneca Parker said Friday, a day after the Dolphins selected Parker No. 14 overall. "They don't have a team, really, or a quarterback. I knew I didn't want the Cleveland Browns.
"I know the teams the teams he could go to and the teams he couldn't go to. We were happy with the Miami Dolphins. He was very ecstatic. We're happy, we love the weather."
The Browns passed on Parker at No. 12, selecting Washington nosetackle Danny Shelton instead.
A league source said the Browns had no idea Parker's mom didn't want him to play for them when they passed on him.
The Vikings, who have Parker's former Louisville quarterback Teddy Bridgewater as their starter, also passed on him at No. 11.
Last year, Bridgewater also said he didn't want to play for the Browns, who passed on him when they traded up from No. 26 to No. 22 and selected Johnny Manziel.
A source told Northeast Ohio Media Group in January that Bridgewater didn't want to come here because he knew not everyone was on board with drafting him. Another source told NEOMG that former Browns offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan was not in favor of drafting Bridgewater.
In his press conference, Parker said he was pretty sure the Vikings were going to take him at No. 11.
Parker missed seven games with a foot injury last season, which was a red flag for some teams. The Dolphins said they were comfortable with the medical report.
Parker was one of the Browns' 30 pre-draft visits to Cleveland.
Last edited by clevesteve; 02/01/16 01:59 PM. Reason: second article
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027 |
Free agency within the team: I'm ok with retaining Benji, Schwartz, and Gipson as long as they are all team-friendly deals. I don't really feel like we absolutely have to bring any of these guys back. None are elite at their position. The Browns can absolutely take a hard stance with the retaining guys portion of the offseason.
Free agency outside our team: I wonder if Mohamed Sanu is an option considering Jackson's connection to the Bengals. He's 27, unrestricted, and would be a nice insurance policy on not being able to score exactly what you want in FA, as well as deciding on the future of Josh Gordon. Overall this team will probably pretty quiet on this front. I don't think you really win by winning in FA.
I think with the draft, you have to come away with a QB at 2 or 32. I don't think you can go beyond that and start talking about guys like Cardale Jones, who are 2-3 year projects. Would be unhealthy all around. The Browns really need one of these quarterbacks who is ready to start day 1, much like Teddy, Carr, Bortles, etc.. Sounds like that is clearly defined as Goff, Wentz, and Lynch. Maybe Cook, but I think there is a gray area with him.
I love Joey Bosa at 2. Howeer, if the scouts and some of this new anylytics breakdowns comes out high on Goff or one of these other QB's, I think you have no choice. It's our top need, and it will always be until we finally figure it out..
I love Will Fuller from ND. I don't think he lasts to round 3, but that dude should be able to play at the NFL level.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101 |
Denver has 5 players listed in the top 50 FA per NLFTradeRumor.com. They are probably going to pay dearly to keep Von Miller and Brock Osweiler, leaving Malik Jackson and Danny Trevathan as possibly available. I would really like to see us make a concerted run at Jackson and or Trevathan. Wilkerson of the Jets is also listed, but I suspect they will resign him. Jackson may be the best DE available in FA and would mitigate not taking Bosa at #2 if QB is the route they want to take.
1. #GMstrong 2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb 3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa 4. ClemenZa #1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
They can cut a lot to save money. Also Osweiler did not play too great. Probably going to get a deal structured like Kap and Dalton's, but a much lower price tag. I think they can retain a lot. But I'd love to make a run at anyone on their defense if we can.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums The Archives 2016 NFL Season 2016 NFL Draft Mock Offseason
|
|