Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Goff doesn't come from a small school or a spread offense. Do you even know who we're talking about?


I think Deputy has a great understanding of the game and I think it might be wise for some of you to actually listen to what he has to say rather than trying to make him look bad.


His facts are incorrect. That does not help him make his case.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
LOL..........I wonder why?

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Goff doesn't come from a small school or a spread offense. Do you even know who we're talking about?


I think Deputy has a great understanding of the game and I think it might be wise for some of you to actually listen to what he has to say rather than trying to make him look bad.


His facts are incorrect. That does not help him make his case.


The Bear Raid offense is not a spread?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,853
A
Legend
Offline
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,853
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
LOL..........I wonder why?
So, I'm not the only one then?

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: archbolddawg
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
LOL..........I wonder why?
So, I'm not the only one then?



It helps if you do the Barney Fife voice reading my posts.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Goff doesn't come from a small school or a spread offense. Do you even know who we're talking about?


I think Deputy has a great understanding of the game and I think it might be wise for some of you to actually listen to what he has to say rather than trying to make him look bad.


His facts are incorrect. That does not help him make his case.


The Bear Raid offense is not a spread?


No. It's part of the air raid offense. Sonny Dykes is a direct descendant of Hal Mumme and Mike Leach, serving under them for most of his career. He used to be a cooffensive coordinator with Dana too. Cal does not run a spread offense. They run a variation of the air raid, which is an off shoot of the run and shoot. Nothing spread about it.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Goff doesn't come from a small school or a spread offense. Do you even know who we're talking about?


I think Deputy has a great understanding of the game and I think it might be wise for some of you to actually listen to what he has to say rather than trying to make him look bad.


His facts are incorrect. That does not help him make his case.


The Bear Raid offense is not a spread?


No. It's part of the air raid offense. Sonny Dykes is a direct descendant of Hal Mumme and Mike Leach, serving under them for most of his career. He used to be a cooffensive coordinator with Dana too. Cal does not run a spread offense. They run a variation of the air raid, which is an off shoot of the run and shoot. Nothing spread about it.


Now you are just being stupid.

The Bear Raid and Air Raid offenses are both spread offenses by definition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spread_offense
Quote:

Overview[edit]
The spread offense is specifically designed to open up seams and holes for the offense, and does not specifically focus on the passing or running game, however, like all types of offenses, there can be sub types which can specifically focus on the passing or running game, or even option, fakes or trick plays.[6]

Philosophical differences[edit]
The basic pre-snap appearance of the spread offense is constant—multiple receivers on the field and a shotgun snap. However, the actual execution from those formations varies, depending on the preferences of the coaching staff. While most of these are balanced offenses, such as the one utilized by Larry Fedora's North Carolina Tar Heels, several sub-forms also exist.

Air Raid[edit]
One of the extreme versions is the pass-oriented Air Raid typified by Hal Mumme in the late 1990s at the University of Kentucky. Coaches that employ this version of the spread are Mike Gundy's Oklahoma State Cowboys, Dana Holgorsen's West Virginia Mountaineers, Mark Stoops's Kentucky Wildcats, Mike Leach's Washington State Cougars, Kliff Kingsbury's Texas Tech Red Raiders, Bob Stoops's Oklahoma Sooners and Kevin Sumlin's Texas A&M Aggies. This version employs multiple spread sets and is heavily reliant on the quarterback and coaches being able to call the appropriate play at the line of scrimmage based on how the defense sets up. California Golden Bears head coach Sonny Dykes, who coached under Mike Leach at Texas Tech, uses a variant of the Air Raid that makes more use of the running game and tight ends and running backs in the passing game. The Run & Shoot associated with June Jones is a well-known variant[citation needed].


Spread option[edit]
The spread option is a shotgun-based variant of the classic triple option attack that was prevalent in football well into the 1990s. Notable users of this offense include Rich Rodriguez's Arizona Wildcats, Urban Meyer's Ohio State Buckeyes, Mark Helfrich's Oregon Ducks, Hugh Freeze's Ole Miss Rebels, and Dan Mullen's Mississippi State Bulldogs. Despite the multi-receiver sets, the spread option is a run-first scheme that requires a quarterback that is comfortable carrying the ball, a mobile offensive line that can effectively pull and trap, and receivers that can hold their blocks. Its essence is misdirection. Because it operates from the shotgun, its triple option usually consists of a slot receiver, a tailback, and a dual-threat quarterback. One of the primary plays in the spread option is the zone read, invented and made popular by Rich Rodriguez. The quarterback must be able to read the defensive end and determine whether he is collapsing down the line or playing up-field containment in order to determine the proper play to make with the ball. A key component of the spread option is that the running threat posed by the quarterback forces a defensive lineman or linebacker to "freeze" in order to plug the running lane; this has the effect of blocking the target player without needing to put a body on him.

The Pistol[edit]
A third version of the spread offense is the Pistol offense used by Brian Polian's Nevada Wolf Pack, Dabo Swinney's Clemson Tigers and some high schools across the nation. Developed by Chris Ault, the Pistol focuses on using the run with many offensive players, and it calls for the quarterback to line up about three yards behind the center and take a short shotgun snap at the start of each play. Instead of lining up next to the quarterback like in the normal shotgun, the tailback lines up behind the quarterback at normal depth. This enables him to take a handoff while running toward the line of scrimmage, rather than parallel to it as is the case from the standard shotgun. Since Ault installed the Pistol in 2004, his Wolf Pack has been among of the NCAA's most productive offenses. In 2009, they led the country in rushing and total offense, and were also the first team in college football history to have three players rush for 1,000 yards in the same season.


Here's an article on his Offensive coordinator.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Franklin_(coach)

Quote:
Tony Franklin (born August 29, 1957) is an American college football coach, currently serving as the offensive coordinator for the Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders of Conference USA after making a lateral move from the same position with the California Golden Bears.[1]
Franklin was previously the quarterbacks coach and offensive coordinator of the Auburn University football team, before being fired from that position on October 8, 2008.[2] Franklin is known for his expertise in the spread offense and for developing quarterbacks. Under his guidance, quarterbacks Tim Couch, Dusty Bonner, and Jared Lorenzen each led the SEC in passing, with Couch becoming the first player selected in the 1999 NFL Draft.
While a running back in college at Murray State in 1977, Franklin was a teammate of fellow future coach Bud Foster, who later came to prominence as the Virginia Tech defensive coordinator.


Jared Goff Spread QB

Cal plays in a dink and dunk spread offense

This suggests that he can learn to throw... often present.


The fact that I have to take that much time to look up links to explain that Cal runs a spread offense is amazing.

Now that you know that fact, do you still want to start this guy right away?

It's not that I put a lot of weight in someone's opinion that doesn't know what a spread offense is, but I am interested if that makes any difference at all to you.?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
http://www.foxsports.com/college-footbal...rterback-050715

Here's some analytics. The article is pretty long, but a good read. I posted only part of it below.

Quote:
snip


Cool "Analytics" article. Although I really have to wonder if they know what they're talking about. The methodology already starts very, very questionable.
Quote:

Methodology

Since we know the NFL is ever evolving, and is becoming more of a passing league even in the last 5 years than it was the 5 years prior, I limited this exercise only to NFL QBs drafted since 2000. I also limited it only to NFL QBs who started over 10 games. There was no desire to look at the total failures, such as 2nd rd picks Brian Brohm, John Beck, Marques Tuiasosopo etc. While a secondary analysis could be run on those players, I set my cut-off at over 10 starts.


I'd like to wonder why they cut it off at 10 games? That doesn't seem like it should matter. I understand not wanting to include the stats of random QB's who had to sub in due to injury, but a 10 game minimum certainly makes the trend go upwards towards sitting them. This methodology might have an inherent bias as well. Mainly in regards to 2nd and 1st round QB picks who didn't pan out before 10 games starts. QB's who were drafted in the first 2 rounds should be be equally or more successful than QB's who were drafted 1st, but started right away. Theoretically they would have around the same potential to flourish, but would have the added benefit of being groomed behind a starter. Thus, according to their theory that sitting benefits a QB more than starting them, these QB's, who they discarded, should have a greater chance at succeeding in the NFL. It seems weird that these players are not included, nor do we hear about them more.

I think this is kinda bunk math, no offense.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
snip



I'll start off by apologizing. I underestimated your knowledge. I thought you were trying to imply the air raid was a "zone-read spread hurr durr thing", a common misconception on here. My bad, man.

However, if you want to include him as a "spread" QB, by which accounts, he is, then I'd suggest you relook at all the college QB's who came from similar systems. Very few college teams have been running a traditional pro style offenses for the past 2 decades. Categorizing Goff as a spread QB would also lasso in half of the starting QB's in the NFL. Do you see why I thought you meant "zone read" spread now? I'm sorry, man.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
http://www.foxsports.com/college-footbal...rterback-050715

Here's some analytics. The article is pretty long, but a good read. I posted only part of it below.

Quote:
snip


Cool "Analytics" article. Although I really have to wonder if they know what they're talking about. The methodology already starts very, very questionable.
Quote:

Methodology

Since we know the NFL is ever evolving, and is becoming more of a passing league even in the last 5 years than it was the 5 years prior, I limited this exercise only to NFL QBs drafted since 2000. I also limited it only to NFL QBs who started over 10 games. There was no desire to look at the total failures, such as 2nd rd picks Brian Brohm, John Beck, Marques Tuiasosopo etc. While a secondary analysis could be run on those players, I set my cut-off at over 10 starts.


I'd like to wonder why they cut it off at 10 games? That doesn't seem like it should matter. I understand not wanting to include the stats of random QB's who had to sub in due to injury, but a 10 game minimum certainly makes the trend go upwards towards sitting them. This methodology might have an inherent bias as well. Mainly in regards to 2nd and 1st round QB picks who didn't pan out before 10 games starts. QB's who were drafted in the first 2 rounds should be be equally or more successful than QB's who were drafted 1st, but started right away. Theoretically they would have around the same potential to flourish, but would have the added benefit of being groomed behind a starter. Thus, according to their theory that sitting benefits a QB more than starting them, these QB's, who they discarded, should have a greater chance at succeeding in the NFL. It seems weird that these players are not included, nor do we hear about them more.

I think this is kinda bunk math, no offense.


They wanted a minimum games played to weed out the stats of guys that barely played. They needed 5 starts in the season that they first started and 5 starts in the season after that. Does that make sense?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Yes, I actually say that.
Quote:
I understand not wanting to include the stats of random QB's who had to sub in due to injury, but a 10 game minimum certainly makes the trend go upwards towards sitting them.


I think this is trying to set a model instead of trying to answer the question. There's a lot of inherent bias in their study.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
snip



I'll start off by apologizing. I underestimated your knowledge. I thought you were trying to imply the air raid was a "zone-read spread hurr durr thing", a common misconception on here. My bad, man.

However, if you want to include him as a "spread" QB, by which accounts, he is, then I'd suggest you relook at all the college QB's who came from similar systems. Very few college teams have been running a traditional pro style offenses for the past 2 decades. Categorizing Goff as a spread QB would also lasso in half of the starting QB's in the NFL. Do you see why I thought you meant "zone read" spread now? I'm sorry, man.


I agree, there are a ton more spread QB's now then there used to be. I think that should lead to a trend of sitting QB's more, but the pressure to start a high pick is still there. I also think that we might start to see more spread offenses in the NFL eventually to get these guys on the field. I'm not sure how well that is going to work though.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
There are good QBs in both groups. It's almost like both sitting and not sitting works (depending on the circumstances).

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Yes, I actually say that.
Quote:
I understand not wanting to include the stats of random QB's who had to sub in due to injury, but a 10 game minimum certainly makes the trend go upwards towards sitting them.


I think this is trying to set a model instead of trying to answer the question. There's a lot of inherent bias in their study.


If anything, it would bias it to the guys that start early. If they started poorly and were pulled before the 5th week, they wouldn't count towards the numbers.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
If you look to the middle of that article, they also show each QB's performance individually.

I see you found that after I posted this.

Yes there are good QB's in both groups and a few of those who started right away were spread QB's.

The difference in the numbers is pretty significant though.

Last edited by DeputyDawg; 01/24/16 05:05 PM.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
snip



I'll start off by apologizing. I underestimated your knowledge. I thought you were trying to imply the air raid was a "zone-read spread hurr durr thing", a common misconception on here. My bad, man.

However, if you want to include him as a "spread" QB, by which accounts, he is, then I'd suggest you relook at all the college QB's who came from similar systems. Very few college teams have been running a traditional pro style offenses for the past 2 decades. Categorizing Goff as a spread QB would also lasso in half of the starting QB's in the NFL. Do you see why I thought you meant "zone read" spread now? I'm sorry, man.


I agree, there are a ton more spread QB's now then there used to be. I think that should lead to a trend of sitting QB's more, but the pressure to start a high pick is still there. I also think that we might start to see more spread offenses in the NFL eventually to get these guys on the field. I'm not sure how well that is going to work though.


Yes, in the past decade. I mean, Tim Couch was a spread QB. Same with Eli, Rivers, Big Ben, Flacco, etc., etc. were also all spread QB's. I don't think the trend accounts for them as "Spread QB's", but they are.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Yes, I actually say that.
Quote:
I understand not wanting to include the stats of random QB's who had to sub in due to injury, but a 10 game minimum certainly makes the trend go upwards towards sitting them.


I think this is trying to set a model instead of trying to answer the question. There's a lot of inherent bias in their study.


If anything, it would bias it to the guys that start early. If they started poorly and were pulled before the 5th week, they wouldn't count towards the numbers.


I disagree, but this disagreement shows why they should include it. I still don't know why they didn't... Except to toss out some 2nd rounders who didn't fit their model.

Quote:

There was no desire to look at the total failures, such as 2nd rd picks Brian Brohm, John Beck, Marques Tuiasosopo etc.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
The article doesn't look at the spread system vs pro style.

The reason you sit a QB is to let him learn how to play under center, learn 3, 5, and 7 step drops, learn the NFL routes that the WR's are running, learn read progressions, etc...

Lots of QB's aren't asked to do any of these things in the spread. There are guys in pro systems that aren't asked to do them as well. If you see a QB in a pro system that is always in the shotgun, chances are that he has bad footwork for example. That's not to say that they can't do it right away, but your coaches will find that out very quickly if they can. All these things require massive amounts of reps to learn if they can't do it right away. When your QB is getting pounded, he'll go back to bad habits and you'll have to start over again. If you can get it to be instict before he goes on the field, he's less likely to revert.

If coaches were left alone, I would bet that more QB's sat their first year like you see in College and High School, but fans pressure owners and owners pressure coaches.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
If coaches were left alone, I would bet that more QB's sat their first year like you see in College and High School, but fans pressure owners and owners pressure coaches.


Or the teams drafting QBs high have crappy QBs on the roster and they play the best player.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
We
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
Yes, I actually say that.
Quote:
I understand not wanting to include the stats of random QB's who had to sub in due to injury, but a 10 game minimum certainly makes the trend go upwards towards sitting them.


I think this is trying to set a model instead of trying to answer the question. There's a lot of inherent bias in their study.


If anything, it would bias it to the guys that start early. If they started poorly and were pulled before the 5th week, they wouldn't count towards the numbers.


I disagree, but this disagreement shows why they should include it. I still don't know why they didn't... Except to toss out some 2nd rounders who didn't fit their model.

Quote:

There was no desire to look at the total failures, such as 2nd rd picks Brian Brohm, John Beck, Marques Tuiasosopo etc.


Did any of those guys actually play at all? I'm not sure but I don't remember seeing any of them play. That might be what they meant by "total failures"

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
If coaches were left alone, I would bet that more QB's sat their first year like you see in College and High School, but fans pressure owners and owners pressure coaches.


Or the teams drafting QBs high have crappy QBs on the roster and they play the best player.



If it's me, "less crappy than our starter" isn't a good reason to put a rookie on the field before he gets the fundamentals down. If he already has them, then put him out there, but don't screw up his career because he is less crappy than what you have.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
If he already has them, then put him out there, but don't screw up his career because he is less crappy than what you have.


Yes. This is the answer.

If he is ready, start him. Don't just sit him to sit him.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
The article doesn't look at the spread system vs pro style.

Never said it did. Just saying, in general, people who think spread QB's aren't NFL ready by using the Tebows, Manziels, and Alex Smiths to support this claim may also need to include those other QB's I listed, if they wanted to consider Goff a spread QB.
Quote:

The reason you sit a QB is to let him learn how to play under center, learn 3, 5, and 7 step drops, learn the NFL routes that the WR's are running, learn read progressions, etc...

I thought they taught them how to knit in this time. Hmmm. The more you know.

Quote:

All these things require massive amounts of reps to learn if they can't do it right away. When your QB is getting pounded, he'll go back to bad habits and you'll have to start over again. If you can get it to be instict before he goes on the field, he's less likely to revert.

In theory, but I'm not sure it works. If it did then Brock Osweiler wouldn't be sitting on the bench right now. It's not as clear cut as you're trying to make it out to be.

But now that you mentioned, a QB getting pounded will make him revert to bad habits, I wonder if this is a thing we really have to worry about here. As of today, our line provides a QB about 4 seconds to throw. This is about 1-2 seconds longer than what's required in the NFL. I'm not sure if our rookie QB will get pounded. And, if he does, it probably means he needs to get the ball out quicker, which he'll learn to do through experience only.

Quote:

If coaches were left alone, I would bet that more QB's sat their first year like you see in College and High School, but fans pressure owners and owners pressure coaches.


There are a lot of QB's who start right away in college...

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
If coaches were left alone, I would bet that more QB's sat their first year like you see in College and High School, but fans pressure owners and owners pressure coaches.


There are a lot of QB's who start right away in college...[/quote]

For example:

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jared-goff-1.html

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
If he already has them, then put him out there, but don't screw up his career because he is less crappy than what you have.


Yes. This is the answer.

If he is ready, start him. Don't just sit him to sit him.
I'm not sure anyone is arguing to sit a rookie QB just to sit him. I think the operating assumption is that none of this year's QBs are ready. The converse is also true, if he's not ready, don't start him just to start him.


1. #GMstrong
2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb
3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa
4. ClemenZa #1
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,341
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,341
How long does it take to get ready? Why do players need a full season? All these prospects have "pro" (style?) QB coaches getting them ready for the draft. They don't have to worry about school anymore and can focus on football as much as they are willing. I like that Goff and Wentz are reportedly football junkies. Both are also supposedly bright in the classroom. I think they have the best chance of being ready early. They'll definitely have a lot of work to put in, though.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: GrimmBrown
How long does it take to get ready? Why do players need a full season? All these prospects have "pro" (style?) QB coaches getting them ready for the draft. They don't have to worry about school anymore and can focus on football as much as they are willing. I like that Goff and Wentz are reportedly football junkies. Both are also supposedly bright in the classroom. I think they have the best chance of being ready early. They'll definitely have a lot of work to put in, though.


It really depends on what is wrong. A good coach normally knows when a guy is ready. Sometimes they have no choice in the matter and the owner tells them to put him in or the starter gets injured.

The only thing that a QB can't learn off the field is putting everything together. CHS mentioned learning to speed up your release by experience only. While that's true, it's actually easier to get that experience off the field then on the field.

It used to be that you just ran a bunch of 5 on 5 drills running play after play and a coach there with a stopwatch tapping a free rusher on the shoulder when he wanted him to rush the QB. Now you can have the QB practice it all by himself with a VR headset and all of that recorded information can be watched live or downloaded and later watched as a film by your QB coach and QB together.`Either way, you get a lot more snaps in a shorter amount of time off the field than on the field.

Here are the things I would look for to feel comfortable starting a QB. I listed them in the order they happen in a play.

1) Pre-snap reads. Does he read correctly and can he audible correctly?

2) Center exchange and drop back. Can he comfortably get the exchange and make the needed 3, 5 or 7 step drops with good footwork and the ball protected?

3) Read Progression. Is the QB comfortable enough with the playbook to go through all his progressions with a good internal clock?

4) Matriculating the football. Can the QB deliver the ball with a solid throwing motion, in a throwing lane, with proper touch?

5) A thick skin. If the QB makes a mistake, does he dwell on it and let it effect his play or does he get over it and move on?

If you can get those 5 things, a QB is ready to be on the field.

Some things he learns later...

NFL defenses disguise their defense till it's too late to adjust sometimes, for these you need hot reads for both the QB and WR and they have to be on the same page.

Selling play-action

Pocket presence.

Understanding how to adjust his game to the other teams tendencies.

Ball placement. Can he put it where only the WR can get it? Can he lead a WR?

Knowing when he has a free play.

Clock Management.

Hard counts and quick snaps.

Running a no huddle.

Film study.

Commanding a huddle.

All of these and about 1000 more things, you can learn as you go, but you'll never get this far if you don't have solid fundamentals to begin with.

Hey, I know everyone doesn't want to have to wait, but the best way to screw up a QB is to throw him out there too early and most of these guys aren't even used to playing under center.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
If only there was a guy like this in the upcoming draft. . .

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
If coaches were left alone, I would bet that more QB's sat their first year like you see in College and High School, but fans pressure owners and owners pressure coaches.


There are a lot of QB's who start right away in college...


For example:

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jared-goff-1.html[/quote]


Not to knock Goff, he does impress me as a smart QB, but starting right away in a spread offense is a whole lot different than starting right away in a pro-style offense.

I am sure there are some QB's that start as true freshman, but I'm also sure that there are more that don't.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
If coaches were left alone, I would bet that more QB's sat their first year like you see in College and High School, but fans pressure owners and owners pressure coaches.


There are a lot of QB's who start right away in college...


For example:

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jared-goff-1.html



Not to knock Goff, he does impress me as a smart QB, but starting right away in a spread offense is a whole lot different than starting right away in a pro-style offense.

I am sure there are some QB's that start as true freshman, but I'm also sure that there are more that don't.[/quote]

I agree that most QBs don't start as true freshmen.

Just pointing out that Goff did and it didn't kill him. He then became very successful.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
If coaches were left alone, I would bet that more QB's sat their first year like you see in College and High School, but fans pressure owners and owners pressure coaches.


There are a lot of QB's who start right away in college...


For example:

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jared-goff-1.html



Not to knock Goff, he does impress me as a smart QB, but starting right away in a spread offense is a whole lot different than starting right away in a pro-style offense.

I am sure there are some QB's that start as true freshman, but I'm also sure that there are more that don't.

I agree that most QBs don't start as true freshmen.

Just pointing out that Goff did and it didn't kill him. He then became very successful.


In an offense that doesn't ask very much from him.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
If coaches were left alone, I would bet that more QB's sat their first year like you see in College and High School, but fans pressure owners and owners pressure coaches.


There are a lot of QB's who start right away in college...


For example:

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jared-goff-1.html



Not to knock Goff, he does impress me as a smart QB, but starting right away in a spread offense is a whole lot different than starting right away in a pro-style offense.

I am sure there are some QB's that start as true freshman, but I'm also sure that there are more that don't.

I agree that most QBs don't start as true freshmen.

Just pointing out that Goff did and it didn't kill him. He then became very successful.


In an offense that doesn't ask very much from him.


As a freshmen? No.

He did more as the seasons went on though.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...erback-prospect

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
If coaches were left alone, I would bet that more QB's sat their first year like you see in College and High School, but fans pressure owners and owners pressure coaches.


There are a lot of QB's who start right away in college...


For example:

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/jared-goff-1.html



Not to knock Goff, he does impress me as a smart QB, but starting right away in a spread offense is a whole lot different than starting right away in a pro-style offense.

I am sure there are some QB's that start as true freshman, but I'm also sure that there are more that don't.

I agree that most QBs don't start as true freshmen.

Just pointing out that Goff did and it didn't kill him. He then became very successful.


In an offense that doesn't ask very much from him.


As a freshmen? No.

He did more as the seasons went on though.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball...erback-prospect


Quote:
At the core of the offense are nine passing concepts, five or six screen concepts and five or six running concepts.


Quote:
During our conversation, Franklin says that if I were his starting quarterback, I could learn the offense tomorrow.


Are you sure about that?

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Did you read the whole article?

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Quote:
For the first time in his career, Goff can change anything and everything he wants at the line of scrimmage. From routes to the protection scheme, he can call whatever he wants.

"I trust him with my job," Franklin says. "When you're letting a guy do that, then you're putting it all in his hands."

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Yes, and I get that they add extra reads to those core plays, but that is still miles away from Pro concepts.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Great so they trust him with 15 passing concepts and 6 running concepts with top down or bottom up reads enough to let him audible.

The author is trying to make the unimpressive look impressive.

Last edited by DeputyDawg; 01/24/16 10:10 PM.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Yes, and I get that they add extra reads to those core plays, but that is still miles away from Pro concepts.


So are most of the "pro" offenses that college teams run.

The point is that Goff is going to be in film room until he knows what to do. And then after that he will still be in the film room to master what he knows.

"Spread" QBs have been succeeding in the NFL for years.

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Yes, and I get that they add extra reads to those core plays, but that is still miles away from Pro concepts.


So are most of the "pro" offenses that college teams run.

The point is that Goff is going to be in film room until he knows what to do. And then after that he will still be in the film room to master what he knows.

"Spread" QBs have been succeeding in the NFL for years.



Just multiply the plays by about 100 and complicate the reads by a factor of 5 and you'll go from this system to a pro system.

Again I'm not faulting Goff. He thrived in the system that he was in. But reading that doesn't make me think he is more capable of starting right away, it just makes me worry more.

Last edited by DeputyDawg; 01/24/16 10:25 PM.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: DeputyDawg
Yes, and I get that they add extra reads to those core plays, but that is still miles away from Pro concepts.


So are most of the "pro" offenses that college teams run.

The point is that Goff is going to be in film room until he knows what to do. And then after that he will still be in the film room to master what he knows.

"Spread" QBs have been succeeding in the NFL for years.



Just multiply the plays by about 100 and complicate the reads by a factor of 5 and you'll go from this system to a pro system.

Again I'm not faulting Goff he thrived in the system that he was in. But reading that doesn't make me think he is more capable of starting right away, it just makes me worry more.


Why can other spread QBs succeed in their first year, but not Goff?

Page 6 of 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2016 NFL Season 2016 NFL Draft The 2016 Quarterback class

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5