DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Everything Else... Trump thread pt 2...

Thanks to the Libs, I don't have to deport him, I can just marry him now.

Polygamy isn't legal yet. Gotta wait a bit bro.

I've been away for a week, sorta thought by now you guys would have...

Ah, nevermind.

And you think Rubio makes THAT big of a jump?

He isn't anywhere close to being electable.

That's where I was, Iowa.
The fix is in.
Rubio!

So your gardener fixed the election in Iowa?

You sure he's Mexican and not Chinese?

Not cool, bringing a guys wife into it!

Gonna start calling you El coyote.

It is supposed to matter. I don't think you NEED TO have served to be an effective President... but you have to talk like you have some appreciation for the lives (ours and theirs) that would be affected by your orders/actions...

Is this your sense of humor that gets lost on me sometimes 40

No sir. I was actually traveling.

Cruz wins Iowa! A bit unexpected if you ask me. Although if he ever debated Clinton, he would rip her to shreds.

lol. Thanks for the laugh.

Not a surprise at all. My prediction stands, that Trump would fail to win Iowa and New Hampshire.

People embrace the protest, sometimes even right up to the ballot box ..... but once they go to vote, a lot of people think about how the person they are voting for would look as President, and often the protest candidate fails that test.

I'm surprised, but I guess I shouldn't.

Y'all fell back on the religious nutcase. That's more in line with conservative voters nowadays.

How is he a religious nutcase? Pro life and traditional marriage? That's not being a nut. That's right where a person of faith ought to be.

A religious nut is somebody that has married like three or four 14 year olds when you're 45 or something like that.

traditional marriage based off what?

christianity?

we aren't a christian nation. also, the concept of marriage has been around longer than the church. the church didn't invent marriage.

pro-life? it's already established that you republicans don't give a damn about the baby after birth.

you're not pro-life, you're pro-birth. there is a massive difference.

i can go on and on, but ultimately, at the of the day, Cruz is way too religious for my taste.

religion isn't gonna get us out of an economic crisis.

religion isn't going to end the wars, hell, it STARTS them.

you think the majority of americans care about gay marriage?

we care about putting food on the table. we aren't concerned with your personal anger against gays over what some old ass book says.

the majority of americans don't care about abortions.

some girl in maine getting an abortion doesn't affect my rent payment due at the first of the month here in cleveland. if she wants to get rid of the baby, it isn't my problem. as long as i don't pay for it unless in the case of rape and incest, then it's whatever.

i dare somebody to tell a bold face lie that you lie awake crying at night over the abortions that happen to people you never met. y'all don't give it a second thought unless it's brought up in forums like this.

the fake outrage is ridiculous. you religious people are always outraged about something.

war on christmas?

war on jesus?

war on christians?

man cut that mess out. nobody cares, we can about putting food on the table. tell me what cruz is gonna do about THAT.

tell me what he's gonna do with the 40% of food we waste as a nation every year.

tell me what's he's gonna do about the federal debt and the budget.

tell me what he's gonna do about big business screwing over the american people.

tell me what he's gonna do about immigration instead of "build a wall".

tell me what he's gonna do about the middle east without sounding like a Call of Duty game.

tell me what he's gonna do about the justice system.

tell me what he's gonna do about the war on drugs.


i don't care about what his PERSONAL feelings are about tradition marriage is.

i don't care about what his PERSONAL feelings are about abortion. it's legal. it's been legal.


the bible isn't gonna solve our problems.

To me, a religious nutcase is someone who professes to follow Christ, but disagrees with what He taught at almost every turn, and whose life does not match his or her professed faith.

I worry about the fact that so many people claim to be Christians, but their lives outside of church are identical to every non-believer. I am deeply concerned about them, because I was one of them. I pretended that the Bible said whatever I needed it to say in order to maintain my sinful lifestyle.

I thank God for rescuing me, because I could not rescue myself.

" There would be less disease,less cancer and less Aids and diabetes I this country if people would simply pray . God blesses the righteous with good health and curses the immoral with sickness ."

Yeah that sounds like centered well balanced person . Wow !

Oh yeah... easily. Hillary could be on stage and Cruz could be somewhere else and Tweet his replies and he'd still win.

Seriously, what can Hillary run on? "Ted Cruz only talks a good game about killing people, I'VE actually killed four" ??

lol

I disagree with that whole section. I cannot pretend to know why God does things, and anyone who says what was quoted simply acknowledges that they do not know the teachings of Christ. Jesus said that God does things for His own purposes, not because of the actions of man. God made a man blind from birth, not because of anything that man, or his parents did .... but so that God could be glorified by his healing at the hands of Jesus. We don't know the cause, and we shouldn't pretend to do so. Sometimes sinners prosper, while innocents and God fearing suffer and perish. God allows His missionaries to be tortured and killed in some foreign countries, not because He hates them, or that they did something wrong, but that they could glorify God by offering forgiveness to their killers, showing God's love for them., even in the midst of brutal murder. Maybe that gets one person on the fringe of a movement who would do such a thing to become curious about Jesus, the Bible, and why people would face death, not with hatred for their killers, screaming about eternal damnation, but rather why they would face death with peace and love, even for their murderers. That is the kind of thing the Bible teaches, and the lesson Jesus lived, as He forgave those who tortured and tormented Him, and who stripped Him naked, nailed Him to the cross, spit upon Him, and abused Him as he hung on that cross, dying. When He rose from the dead, He didn't seek revenge, but spread His message of Love, one man for his brother, and man's love for God, and God's love for each of us.


Finally, let me just add this: God allowed His own Son, Holy and sinless and perfect, to become human, and to be sacrificed to take away the sins of the world. Jesus didn't come for the innocent and upright. He came for the fallen, the immoral, the sinful, and He came to save us from ourselves, and our own sins. Do we truly believe that God would put His own Son through that, and then say that we who follow Him would be somehow protected from the world and its abuses? This life is important in one way only, and that's that we choose Jesus, and choose life and salvation ... and reach out to those who do not know Christ, and introduce them to Him. God wants us to spread the message of the love Jesus has for us all, and the sacrifice He made for us. Even beyond Jesus Himself, all of His Disciples, except for John, were martyred for their faith. They considered it an honor for die in Christ's service, not to kill others in some act of revenge, but to forgive them as they went to their deaths.

I really wish more people would actually read their Bibles.

I respect your decision to believe in the God of your choosing and although it completely baffles me I appreciate your conviction to that faith . I do think that faith , or any other , has zero place in guiding the politics and policies of this country .

I respectfully disagree.

We are all made up of our beliefs, based on the things we put our faith in. Christian faith is no less valid than faith in anything else in the political arena. Some out their faith in government. Some put their faith in the people. I put my faith in the God who created both.

Which almost as a matter of policy and platform would disqualify many if not most in the Dem Party.

Can't recall the last Rep who called any of our service members murderers...

Can't recall anyone in the GOP giving one of our top generals the moniker "Betrayus" months before he could deliver his report.

Can't recall anyone in the GOP who claimed to dodge sniper fire in where was it, Bosnia?

Can't recall any reports of the GOP trying to suppress military election ballots.

The Dems claim the Iraq War was the greatest military blunder of all time and that we should never have gone in there... yet Bush couldn't have sent a single one with the support of the Dems (of which he got almost all of at the time). If Bush has blood on his hands, the Dems have just as much.

There's a reason around 80+% of the military votes not Democrat.

And let's not forget, a lot of these old timer Democrats like Hillary came from the 1960's era that spat on our troops and called them baby killers. It's not unreasonable to believe that those viewpoints may have not changed.

I won't tell you a lie, but I will tell you the truth. I have laid awake at night and cried for those innocent babies who were murdered by their mothers. I pray for the babies and the mothers every damn day

He scares me as much as Trump. Who I guess came in second in Iowa. FWIW

My republican candidate so far is Rubio or Kasich but I don't think either has a chance.

people in the military today don't vote democrat, because they want that extra cash from deployments all the time, and that nonsense might end since dems are about using the military as a last resort.

we get it, you GOP guys love war, love staying in war, love all this BS.

you guys don't suppress military votes.

you suppress minority votes. so you trade one sin for another. congrats on thinking you had some moral high ground.

I actually think Rubio is the most electable and should be the most realistic nomination, but not sure he will come out on top. To be honest I'm not sure how Clinton is still in the race, she should have already resigned because of the ongoing FBI investigation. I love how she and others try to dismiss that. It is a real thing that's happening and it cannot be ignored. There is just way too much scandal around her...

Winning Iowa is not necessarily a good thing. Iowa only picked it right for a non-sitting president twice since 72, Bush and Obama.



Link

but it's starting to trend, since the last two was picked from iowa.

that's probably why they were battling in that state.

With Rubio's surge last night in Iowa, maybe I'm a bit more optimistic than I was.

I just can't stand Trump and Cruz. Either of them will lead us to nothing but trouble.

As for Clinton, I'm guessing that if the FBI really had something on her, she'd be out. Maybe that will happen.

Anyone remember Gary Hart? He was in the mix until he wasn't when the Donna Rice thing came out. It could happen anytime. But I get the feeling that the Democratic party believes she will not be indicted or arrested or prosecuted for anything or they'd find a way to get her out of the race and get Joe Biden in. He is really their only viable candidate.

Just an opinion

Gary Hart was not Hillary Clinton... Hart was expendable, Clinton is not... they will circle the wagons around Hillary until the absolute last possible moment.

Well I did come away pleased that Rubio finished a strong third, almost took second place. A stepping stone to the Presidency.

Clinton's first act as President would be to pardon herself.

Mothers protect their children at all costs throughout nature.
Abortion is a sickness of the mind in this culture of death we have created. Most abortions are committed for the sake of convenience. Barbaric.

Man I dont really agree with the sickness part and think if a woman wants to kill her kid so be it...where I have a problem and maybe this wont sit well maybe with some...but why doesnt the man have any say...weather he wants the kid..wants the woman to abort it??

I was always careful and probably lucky..but I know some who wasnt so lucky and pay a child support payment to someone who they never was going to be with...one was due to a broken rubber and his payments sure made the living standard of the woment increase a ton better then she was living pre-baby.

IDK what the answers is but holy hell is child support system broken...sorry not quite on topic...this subject makes me scratch my head sometimes on both sides of the issue.

Well,, let me school you Swish! I know an individual who is 82 years old. He wanted nothing more in life than to fight for this country. He came from a military pedigree. However, he had an ear surgery in his childhood that left him with impaired hearing. The military did not want his services.

He has spent the rest of his life in support, love, honor and dedication to America's vets.....including you.

Let us not be so swift to judge based upon a limited knowledge of an individual.

It is not a wise man who uses definitive words such as, always and never with reference to an individual that he knows nothing about. A little like as you continuously do when discussing the GOP.

I agree Cjrae All of my family damn near has served....and I dont think it should be some kind of pre-requisite.

That would be true if it was just him.

But it's not. Every candidate up there besides Paul and surprising trump, has gone up there talking about military dominance and trash talk.....but nobody has done crap.

Hell, I even agreed with hucakbee, they doing all this talk about bombing people and fighting wars, but where's the talk about taking care of the, when they return?

It ain't been coming out of cruz's mouth that often, but it has from trump.

So like I said, your statement would have some merit if it did indeed come from on individual.

But it hasn't.