Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,556
There was a hole where mac played no matter what we did. Farmer burned the bridge with Gipson. Benji who cares. Bad special teamer. Robertson decent nothing special. A lot of this reminds me of Cameron leaving last year and the panic that ensued, well he wasnt that good and most of these guys werent that damn good. Schwartz is still imho the only one that really hurt.

Defense we sucked bad and guys that we brought in to be special and we paid a lot of money to be special werent that damn special. We planted seeds on defense and the seeds just didnt grow. Time to turn the soil add some new seeds.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I respect your football opinions, but I completely disagree w/your takes on Mack. The guy is an outstanding player and his piers know that, even if some on the board do not.

Here is a comment from Joe Thomas:

Quote:
“I understand from a business standpoint they need to move on if they get a better offer somewhere else. I certainly would understand it, but I definitely hope that they’re back,” Thomas said, via Cleveland.com. “I don’t know what the Browns’ perspective is on it. I feel like we have a lot of salary cap space to spend on it. … We have the best right tackle and the best center in the NFL and I’d certainly like to keep those guys. You’re not going to make your team better by getting a worse player at those positions.”

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
I have never insulted without being insulted first. Why Lie. Not because I am overwhelmed by your knowledge ...geesh get over yourself.



Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,332
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 9,332
While Joe Thomas does like fishing, I'm pretty sure you were going for peers, Vers.

Eo, let's let it go. It's easy for all of us to get stuck on things.

Let's try to turn back to football.


[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]
You mess with the "Bull," you get the horns.
Fiercely Independent.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
While Joe Thomas does like fishing, I'm pretty sure you were going for peers, Vers.



blush

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: Mourgrym
There was a hole where mac played no matter what we did. Farmer burned the bridge with Gipson. Benji who cares. Bad special teamer. Robertson decent nothing special. A lot of this reminds me of Cameron leaving last year and the panic that ensued, well he wasnt that good and most of these guys werent that damn good. Schwartz is still imho the only one that really hurt.

Defense we sucked bad and guys that we brought in to be special and we paid a lot of money to be special werent that damn special. We planted seeds on defense and the seeds just didnt grow. Time to turn the soil add some new seeds.



Mourg...nothing here that I disagree with.

The only move I've been outspoken about in detail is Schwartz. That hurt the team and was totally unnecessary and there are no acceptable excuses.



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Interesting. Seems like many our cool w/losing Mack now.

Here are the poll results that cfrs ran:

Quote:
Schwartz or Mack
Only one choice allowed (44 total votes)

Schwartz - 21 (48%)

Mack - 23 (52%)

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: GrimmBrown
I think one of the uses of analytics we're using may be placing monetary values on the different positions rather than individual players (or in addition to player talent through some sort of formula). We may have x% of the cap allotted for center, x% allotted for RT, x% allotted for a return specialist. Those guys may have wanted more than those numbers whatever they may be.

I can understand how that thinking could have resulted in what happened. If we'd been likely to make the playoffs, I'd hope we'd have kept those players. Since we're in full rebuilding mode, I don't think locking in a large portion of the cap to those positions makes a whole lot of sense.

Without knowing the bigger plan it is hard to grade anything yet. I think the only grade we can fairly give is incomplete. Not looking good, but incomplete rather than failing.


grimm...you, like many, are trying to figure out what this front office was trying to accomplish in free agency and you certainly are entitled to your ideas and opinions.

When judging our front office's performance..I ask one question..did they make the team better?



FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Interesting. Seems like many our cool w/losing Mack now.

Here are the poll results that cfrs ran:

Quote:
Schwartz or Mack
Only one choice allowed (44 total votes)

Schwartz - 21 (48%)

Mack - 23 (52%)


vers...I'm not familiar with the poll but if I could only choose one to keep, I would vote for Mack.

The truth is, I would rather vote for keeping both, because both are important parts of an offensive line that was only going to get better.

over on another thread, I saw this..

https://vine.co/v/iBII62YqXLz

..it reminded me that all it takes is one blown assignment and your QB could be spending the rest of the season on IR.

If the Browns do draft a QB at #2..he deserves to be protected by the best Oline the front office could field. That will not be the case for the Browns rookie QB.

While Sashi and Depo are not old enough to remember what happens when the Browns fail to protect their rookie QB...most us do remember..and it is why some of us are very concerned about the priority this front office has on the offensive line.

..about what you would expect from a rookie front office that lacks a football background.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Originally Posted By: mac


When judging our front office's performance..I ask one question..did they make the team better?

[/color]


No one knows until we see the FINISHED PRODUCT, is that what really counts not that we win in FA? thumbsup

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
vers...I'm not familiar with the poll but if I could only choose one to keep, I would vote for Mack.

The truth is, I would rather vote for keeping both, because both are important parts of an offensive line that was only going to get better.


Sorry.......it's in the K-9 Consensus forum.

My first question on that thread was "can we vote to keep both?"

Quote:
over on another thread, I saw this..

https://vine.co/v/iBII62YqXLz


Yeah, I posted that and Erving is worrisome. A lot of us old-timers remember how bad the Cleveland OLs were.

I know this won't be popular w/the folks who are "positive people," but when you have a team full of needs, why in the heck would you create more needs?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog


Yeah, I posted that and Erving is worrisome. A lot of us old-timers remember how bad the Cleveland OLs were.

I know this won't be popular w/the folks who are "positive people," but when you have a team full of needs, why in the heck would you create more needs?


So tell us what exactly could the FO have done to keep Mack if reports are true he wanted out of Cleveland?

And if he and others wanted out of Cleveland how is it the CURRENT FO fault? How did they create the holes?

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
Originally Posted By: Vambo
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog


Yeah, I posted that and Erving is worrisome. A lot of us old-timers remember how bad the Cleveland OLs were.

I know this won't be popular w/the folks who are "positive people," but when you have a team full of needs, why in the heck would you create more needs?


So tell us what exactly could the FO have done to keep Mack if reports are true he wanted out of Cleveland?

And if he and others wanted out of Cleveland how is it the CURRENT FO fault? How did they create the holes?


Those are questions many of us have been waiting pages and pages for to see an answer to...


"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things."
-Jack Burton

-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Here is a story that talks about how this front office may have competed for Mack's services..

Alex Mack's return to Browns 'still very possible' agent says -- and what the void means

By Mary Kay Cabot, Cleveland.com
Follow on Twitter
on March 02, 2016 at 6:11 PM, updated March 02, 2016 at 6:46 PM
link





FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I have answered those questions several times on various threads. You guys just don't want to hear the answers.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I have answered those questions several times on various threads. You guys just don't want to hear the answers.


I'm not trying to demean your (and other's) posts, but I'm sure many of us would like to hear the facts from the "horse's mouth", not opinion or speculation...

Last edited by bbrowns32; 04/08/16 08:27 AM.

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
Yeah, I posted that and Erving is worrisome.


Vers...I don't know if many folks know this, but the reason Erving was a medical red shirt as a freshman at Florida State was due to a back injury, that caused him to miss most of the season.

I have tried to find out if the injury required surgery but info from 2010 is hard to come by. Also, Sep 11, 2013, there was a report that Erving hurt his back in practice and was taken to the hospital. link
...this would be the second time that an injury to Erving's back was an issue. Now these are the only two times something has become public...there could be more incidents that were never reported.

I wonder if "back issues" are the reason Erving appears to be weak in the lower body?


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: bbrowns32
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I have answered those questions several times on various threads. You guys just don't want to hear the answers.


I'm not trying to demean your (and other's) posts, but I'm sure many of us would like to the facts from the "horse's mouth", not opinion or speculation...


Wait! Vambo asked me two questions. I ignored them because I've answered them before. Devil asks the questions again, I answer.......and you complain? notallthere

Meanwhile, tab fabricates a story. I ask if it was opinion or fact, and you guys rush to defend him and attack me......

Furthermore, in Vambo's questions, he is making claims that are opinionated and fueled by speculation and not from the proverbial "horses mouth."

I love you "positive people." rolleyes

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Interesting, mac. I've never seen this reported previous;y...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Hmmmmmmm........I didn't know that, mac. Thanks for the information.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 7,059
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Originally Posted By: bbrowns32
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I have answered those questions several times on various threads. You guys just don't want to hear the answers.


I'm not trying to demean your (and other's) posts, but I'm sure many of us would like to the facts from the "horse's mouth", not opinion or speculation...


Wait! Vambo asked me two questions. I ignored them because I've answered them before. Devil asks the questions again, I answer.......and you complain? notallthere

Meanwhile, tab fabricates a story. I ask if it was opinion or fact, and you guys rush to defend him and attack me......

Furthermore, in Vambo's questions, he is making claims that are opinionated and fueled by speculation and not from the proverbial "horses mouth."

I love you "positive people." rolleyes


Who's complaining? I simply and politely (IMO) stated that we would like to know the actual facts, as there has been so much "back-n-forth" on this subject...


When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the losers...Socrates
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Will do...getting so I don't even want to come here and post cause I don't enjoy NON-Football insults.

I came here before reading your post with the intent to ignore insults and only respond to football.

Back to Football...I don't think anyone is OK and don't care that we lost Mack. Schwartz not too hard to replace.

There is a difference with Accepting what has happened and its Football, time to move on and make the lemonade. Instead of choosing to keep on, n on n on about it. There is not one player except possibly a Franchise QB that in Football you lose you cannot move on a work as a Football team.

I know (no links) just know there is not a OL member or OL Coach on this team dwelling on the loss of Mack. He gone, time to move on! That is the attitude the team has, its harder I guess for fans to do the same.

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,965
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,965
Thank you Eo. It's as simple as, Time to Move on.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
I know (no links) just know there is not a OL member or OL Coach on this team dwelling on the loss of Mack. He gone, time to move on! That is the attitude the team has, its harder I guess for fans to do the same.


How do you know that no OL member or OL coach is not dwelling on the loss of Mack? I am NOT saying that they are, but we don't know. So, it might be unwise to act like the fans are wrong for having a concern about the status of the OL.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Ok I posted this article on another thread...but seems like it needs another go around. Mack WANTED out there was no keeping him..

"This is the only life I get to live," Mack said. "Life in football is even shorter. There are decisions that have to be made that are tough, but you only have so much time to play football.

"I felt it was time to experience a new city and team to make the best out of my football career."

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2623981-alex-macks-difficult-decision-to-finally-leave-cleveland

full article here^...so can we put this whole Mack thing to bed now? please?


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
Here is a story that talks about how this front office may have competed for Mack's services..

Alex Mack's return to Browns 'still very possible' agent says -- and what the void means

By Mary Kay Cabot, Cleveland.com
Follow on Twitter
on March 02, 2016 at 6:11 PM, updated March 02, 2016 at 6:46 PM
link



101...did you even read this?... link

Last edited by mac; 04/08/16 10:59 AM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
yes sir I did. did you read what Mack the man himself said about leaving?


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Originally Posted By: dawgpound101
yes sir I did. did you read what Mack the man himself said about leaving?


101...you are using something that was said long after the critical time period when the Browns still had a chance to retain Mack...

I'm showing you what it would have taken to retain Mack on March 2nd, the day he opted out.

This front office had a chance to keep Mack, but at the core of Moneyball is MONEY! This front office took the cheapest way out, now we will see how it works out.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Why I'm clairvoyant. I know cause the ones who have talked are excited. The is a lot of youth and opportunity and for Football players the OPPORTUNITY TO START is infectious. Competition is infectious.

No links...meaning no 100% proof. I won't go into why would you wish to continue to discredit me. Staying away. Hopefully my explanation was good enough... if not Hopefully the Bitonio will help explain what I could not.

http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/media-cen...2b-9a7423f69b3d


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 234
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 234
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: dawgpound101
yes sir I did. did you read what Mack the man himself said about leaving?


101...you are using something that was said long after the critical time period when the Browns still had a chance to retain Mack...

I'm showing you what it would have taken to retain Mack on March 2nd, the day he opted out.

This front office had a chance to keep Mack, but at the core of Moneyball is MONEY! This front office took the cheapest way out, now we will see how it works out.


You do realize that other then the one or two quotes by Mack's agent the rest of the article is supposition by Mary Kay? I'm not saying she is wrong, but I'm not saying she is right either. However, looking at the fact that Mack to a deal with less money to go to Atlanta, it seems to me that he didn't want to be here.

Now you may say it's all about the guaranteed money and you are right. However, we don't know how much money the Browns guaranteed Mack in their contract offer, but we do know that the overall money was more. So based off of all the information currently available and the fact that Mack took a contract for less money, it seems to me that means he did not want to be here regardless of the money (unless it was ridiculous money) the Browns threw at him.

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 234
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 234
Originally Posted By: eotab
Why I'm clairvoyant. I know cause the ones who have talked are excited. The is a lot of youth and opportunity and for Football players the OPPORTUNITY TO START is infectious. Competition is infectious.

No links...meaning no 100% proof. I won't go into why would you wish to continue to discredit me. Staying away. Hopefully my explanation was good enough... if not Hopefully the Bitonio will help explain what I could not.

http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/media-cen...2b-9a7423f69b3d


EO that was a really good video. I like Bitonio, he seems real and sincere and didn't try to BS when they asked him questions about the team having an offensive HC vs a defensive HC. It was like "Hey Media People, we've been at this exactly 3 days."

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
None of us know what happened, what who said or what who really wanted to do. Why are we acting like we do?

Unless Alex Mack or Mitchell Schwartz is your family member or closet, most personal of friends - are we going to continue to be subjected to the opinion packed views or claims? They wanted out, they wanted in but the staff messed it up, the staff didn't want them and etc etc.

Is it just not becoming pointless yet?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
I liked him too....Loved when he started talking about Joe Thomas...his entire demeanor changed to one of AWE...as if he met a Marvel Comic Hero live and in person...lol laugh

Live and in person... rofl



Last edited by eotab; 04/08/16 11:45 AM.

Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
There is not one player except possibly a Franchise QB that in Football you lose you cannot move on a work as a Football team.


EO..."work as a football team" ?...

This is why we have such strong, varying opinions concerning the Moneyballer's free agency performance..as long as "the Browns are fielding a team", some are satisfied with the performance of our "Moneyballers".

While some are fine with the Browns simply "fielding a team or fielding an offensive line"...(it can be a rotten team or a rotten offensive line, but that does not matter), some are still satisfied that the Moneyballers did a good job in free agency...the fact is, some have much "lower goals" than other board members.

I look at the same situation and I see an opportunity for "the Moneyballers" to build upon one of the few areas of the team that was considered "good" by outsiders who had no agenda or bias. Failure of our BigBrain front office, to maintain one of the best (or better) offensive lines in the NFL, who were only going to get better, exposes an agenda that I do not recognize nor understand. IMO, it was a missed opportunity by this front office, that has more experience looking at "numbers" than they do "judging football talent".

I would like to ask the Moneyballers, what was your goal, allowing Mack and Schwartz to leave in free agency?

IMO, the front office didn't even want to try to keep Mack because the previous management team drafted his replacement last season. Erving was a much "cheaper option"..it was about "money-ball" ..the cheapest option to Sashi and Depo. Anyone can do what Mack did...right?

Same thing with Schwartz..the Browns have Olinemen who can play RT, right?

What Jimmy Haslam and his money ballers don't get, spending your cap space to secure the best players is a good thing...not a bad thing.

Football is not baseball and Moneyball will never work in the NFL if every move is made based on $$$$.

All one has to do is look at the Super Bowl Champs, the Broncos...they spend their cap dollars down much closer to the limit than the Browns do. Same for the Steelers...How ironic is it that studying the salary cap tracker, we see the teams competing for the playoffs and Super Bowl spend the highest percentage of their cap space...and, the teams that spend the least amount of cap space are the losers in the NFL...the teams with the worst record.

It is obvious that some franchises simply don't get it...spending your cap dollars to retain your best players is a good thing, not a bad thing.

That is why Moneyball will not work in the NFL...being cheap gets you nothing, in the NFL.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
BpG Offline
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/718464860732932100


Browns are streamlining their personnel department and have let go of six scouts whose contracts were set to expire, per league sources.






3 weeks before the draft. Incoming disaster.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
First question, were the scouts above the age of 30?

In all seriousness, another move that just draws more question marks than anything.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
BpG...good luck trying to figure out how Sashi and Depo play their game of "Moneyball".


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: mac


That is why Moneyball will not work in the NFL...being cheap gets you nothing, in the NFL.


Man it would really help if you understood what you are taking all this time and effort to complain about.

We don't lose money that we don't spend this year. It gets added to the money that we have next year.

Would you rather buy a Yugo every year for 3 consecutive years or a Ford Explorer once every 3 Years?

The Raiders are using the same type of plan and now they are spending all that collected money after drafting the right pieces. They are actually looking like a playoff team now.

You complain over and over again like Haslam is there listening and will blow things up yet again before the season even starts this year. He's not going to blow it up now so why not save all that whining until after the season is over. It is doing nobody any good listening to all that incessant rambling before we have even started training camp.

Unless you are trying to make this the longest and most painful season ever.

In that case you are succeeding.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
M
mac Offline OP
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,842
Quote:
We don't lose money that we don't spend this year. It gets added to the money that we have next year.


dep...carrying over cap space YET AGAIN, is not going to help the new offensive line block any better.

Spending your cap space to keep the best players who are among the best in the NFL makes more sense than watching our back benchers attempt to fill the void, with the Browns leading the way in cap space yet again.

Look for yourself...teams carrying over the most cap space make up most of the losing franchises in the NFL.

The teams spending their cap space...most are in the playoffs...DO YOU GET THAT ?

Last edited by mac; 04/08/16 12:44 PM.

FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,062
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,062
I have no clue if this is good or bad. However, not all the scouts were let go and Farmer had one of the largest staffs in the NFL.

Anyways, I thought the board is supposed to be completed at this time.

So, in May it'll be Haslem, Brown, DePodesta, Berry, Jackson and 9 scouts (instead of 15) in the War Room.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Page 6 of 10 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum The Browns Front Office...not ready for prime time...

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5