So the alt-right has no specific ideology and is believed to be largely an online movement made up of meme's. So it's kids with a keyboard.
That's so awesome. If you don't have a villain make one up. Unbelievable.
1:20 of this is all you need to know.
It's a white supremacist group in suits and ties.
That doesn't sound like a bunch of 12 year olds.
This video......I could counter point after point.
But the main point is that people like him have support.
A TON of support...
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
The videos were good. Then he went on about abortion and I remembered what ideology I'm watching lol
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
I'm a huge fan of Ben Shapiro. He represents the admirable section of conservatives. Milo is a representative of self hating trolls that got their azzes kicked during the 2012 election on the Internet. Now they're seeking revenge and becoming keyboard warriors from hell.
So the alt-right is just the updated term for all these groups that we already know about.
Actually, sounds more like Alt-right is the culture name, and the sub-groups are white nationalist, nazi's, etc etc.
Cause from poking around on the web, it seems like it isn't just racist but the extreme right, as well.
I guess now that I understand exactly what this is now(thanks for those vids) honestly,....whatever. They always existed, always been here. They just got a face lift and got current.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Look up One People's Project. They expose the alt right for what they are. The founder started this group and has been tracking these people for years. After the Civil Rights movement he was kind of curious what happened to all of the white nationalists leaders after they got whooped on. He knew people like that don't just disappear or have a change of heart. So he's been exposing the alt right ever since.
Bro, I can't stop thinking about that Jared Taylor dude in the video.
Look up his bio. This guy isn't some random. He's got influence and was a teacher.
People can and should believe whatever they choose to, but when we're talking about equality, how do you handle that with s guy who says "equality is a myth"?
Because we all know....he is far from the only guy who believes this completely, or at least versions of it.
And..people like him has money.
Money and influence.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
What do you think about the mods? At least on the surface, it appears to be a pretty balanced group.
Swish, on Sunday, host of "Fox News Sunday" Chris Wallace, asked Dr. Ben Carson If he Was worried about being used by the Donald Trump campaign because he was black.
Donald Trump‘s son on Friday raised questions about Matt Lauer’s links to the Clinton Foundation, suggesting the NBC host may not be fair in his role of forum moderator with the two presidential candidates.
“Obviously there’s a lot of speculation because of his involvement with the foundation,” Eric Trump said in an interview with “Fox and Friends.”
“I hope he’ll be fair,” he continued, saying that NBC and MSNBC have been biased against his father.
I can't believe Mr. Trump signed off on these mods.
But on the surface, it's certainly a valid question. People do it all the time. Use a white, black, or Latino guy as supposedly 'proof' that the other side agrees with their beliefs, instead of just relying on their stances to gain support.
Is Trump doing that with Carson? Dunno. Time will tell.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Bro, I can't stop thinking about that Jared Taylor dude in the video.
Look up his bio. This guy isn't some random. He's got influence and was a teacher.
People can and should believe whatever they choose to, but when we're talking about equality, how do you handle that with s guy who says "equality is a myth"?
Because we all know....he is far from the only guy who believes this completely, or at least versions of it.
And..people like him has money.
Money and influence.
People like him have always existed. People like him will be dealt with how they've always been dealt with. Just ignore them.
So Obama just canceled on the nutbag president of the Phillippines. I'm kind of glad he did.
yea that dude is......jeez.
i also find him to be a massive hypocrite. this guy is going after drug dealers, yet is doing absolutely nothing to deal with the fact that he has a bunch of teenagers and YOUNGER chain smoking cigarettes.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
A guy that supports open vigilante (I used that loosely) mass shootings and referred to the president as a son of a whore is a little crazy.
I was on Facebook the other day and some folks were talking about this saying things like see, Obama isn't popular with other countries leaders... LOL I thought to myself, this is one time I'm glad he's not popular with this jerk.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
It's why I'm not a fan of people asking Trumps kids if they think he's a racist. I mean, really? They love their father. What do you think they're gonna say?
Spouses and Kids and other relatives are, IMO, Off Limits. Even if they stand up for their spouse, parent or whatever.
They aren't running for anything.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
It's why I'm not a fan of people asking Trumps kids if they think he's a racist. I mean, really? They love their father. What do you think they're gonna say?
Spouses and Kids and other relatives are, IMO, Off Limits. Even if they stand up for their spouse, parent or whatever.
They aren't running for anything.
Unless their name is Clinton.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Democratic White House hopeful Hillary Clinton on Tuesday intensified her call for rival Donald Trump to release his tax returns, accusing the billionaire of hiding something that might turn off voters.
Honestly?
Hey, question: Is it a legal requirement to release your tax returns if you run for president? I don't know.
But for the possible liar in chief to get worked up about "hey, he's obviously hiding something"......unreal. The woman has no morals, and no common sense. Whatsoever. She lied.
"I used 1 device for e-mail, for convenience." No, ma'am, you used 13 cell phones, and 4 or 5 ipads. You had an aide smash most of your phones. She lied.
You deleted e-mails - to the tune of 10's of thousands.
You said they were all personal. You lied.
You said you NEVER sent or received any classified info on your personal server. Another lie.
Then, you said you didn't know what the "c" meant on the e-mails you sent and received (it means "classified") after, just a couple of months ago, you said you DID know what the "c" meant. Lied.
And people are considering voting for this serial liar? Because "what she says is the truth. She's being truthful now."?
Don't vote for Trump, that's great. But to vote for hillary is like voting for the devil to be the pastor of your church.
And for you atheists, voting for hillary would be like voting Jesus to be your leader.
TO my knowledge, it's not a law, it's not required. But for the last 40 years or so, all candidates for President provided their tax returns.
ALL OF THEM. SO while it's not required, it's expected.
And what throws the monkey wrench into the thing is, he tried to throw a fast one by us that he can't release them until the audit is complete. And that's BS. HE can do what he wants with his tax returns. He can release them and explain they are under audit and therefore subject to change.
So I ask what might be considered a silly question, what's he hiding?
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
Well that wouldn't be a bad thing seeing as how if you take religion out, Jesus is still just a real awesome person.
So if your goal was to bash Hillary, calling your efforts horrible would be an understatement, as correlating her with Jesus is the exact opposite of what you're trying to accomplish.
Lol, jeez. Good job (not really).
Anyway, it isn't a requirement, but neither is releasing birth certificates. Yet some do, especially Obama since we still have a population in this country who doesn't think he's a naturalized C citizen.
As far as the tax returns, sure, it isn't a requirement. But since every president for at least a few decades has done it, Trump NOT doing it makes him appear shady as all hell.
Especially since the IRS already said he can make them public regardless if he is being audited or not.
So for him not to is telling the country that something shady is going on with his tax returns.
Did he pay any taxes? Where did his income come from? And a host of other questions arise fro. That.
And you know what? Maybe his tax returns show no wrong doing. But since he won't release them like a long list of others have, then speculation as to why is certainly warranted.
Last edited by Swish; 09/06/1603:18 PM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
HE's hiding something? That's what you got out of that?
Hillary has the nerve to say he's hiding something, because he won't release his tax returns, which is an accepted norm, but not required.
And she says HE is hiding something????????????
The serial liar in chief wanna be has the nerve to suggest Trump is hiding something?
She of the "I opted for one device for convenience", when we now know she used 13 cell phones, and 4 or 5 ipads.
She, the deleter of tens of thousands of e-mails.
And she has the gall to say Trump is hiding something, but she isn't? Just trust her?
It goes so far back it's pathetic, really. A lady that knows nothing about futures somehow happens to turn a $1000 cash investment into $100,000 in 10 months?
A lady that, under questioning, says "I don't recall" 40 times?
"I never sent or received any classified e-mails". Then it's proven she did, and she says "I never sent or received any marked classified at the time", then it's proven she did.
A lady that now claims she didn't know what the "c" marking meant.
And you're worried about Trumps tax return?
Who knows, maybe it'll show he only made $1 million, or maybe less. And that's what you're worried about in the face of the serial liar clinton?
what's sad is that liberal's already knows she shady.
especially on this board. there isn't one of us who hasn't called her a snake, or some variant of a sleezebag.
but Arch really makes it seem like she dumped his ass back in the day or something, like he got catfished lmao.
She must have claimed Arch had small hands or something.
Last edited by Swish; 09/06/1603:27 PM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Actually, being able to prove you are a natural born citizen IS a requirement to be the president. (natural born, OR, born to at least 1 parent that was a citizen at the time of birth.)
Quote:
As far as the tax returns, sure, it isn't a requirement.
Thank you.
Quote:
But since every president for at least a few decades has done it, Trump NOT doing it makes him appear shady as all hell.
Agreed. Although I wouldn't say "shady as all hell", like you did.
The IRS is on it. Lois Lerner.....you know, the lady that goes after conservative groups.......if there were some bombshell sitting there about his returns, I'm sure we'd know about it, or WILL know about it.
Quote:
So for him not to is telling the country that something shady is going on with his tax returns.
Interesting logic here. By hiding his not required to be released tax returns, he must be hiding something (if he is hiding something, it's probably that he's not as rich as he says)
BUT, his not releasing a non required document is worse than hillary lying about her e-mails? You know, the ones that, under the fed. gov't. were REQUIRED to be saved?
Her saying "I used 1 device for convenience" when we now know she used 13 phones, and had most of them smashed, and 4-5 ipads?
But those lies are just fine, right? Not releasing a non required tax return is criminal?
Quote:
Did he pay any taxes? Where did his income come from? And a host of other questions arise fro.
And you know what? Maybe his tax returns show no wrong doing. But since he won't release them like a long list of others have, then speculation as to why is certainly warranted.
Won't argue that.
I have a feeling it's because he didn't make near as much as he says he does.
If he didn't pay any taxes, the IRS will determine if, under the law, he was required to. If he was, and didn't, he'll get nailed.
Clinton Foundation, anyone?
It amazes me how the clinton supporters let her skate on everything...just poo poo it, but dammit, Trump won't release his tax returns.
Actually, being able to prove you are a natural born citizen IS a requirement to be the president. (natural born, OR, born to at least 1 parent that was a citizen at the time of birth.)
Proving citizenship to the court and releasing your birth certificate for the public are two separate things. It's a just analogy to Trump's taxes.
It's because (for whatever reason) business owners do no wrong in the eyes of some. It's always the big bad government.
Nah, business owners can do wrong. Just as anyone can. Problem is, when business owners get caught doing wrong, they pay the price. "
You must not know how The Don runs his businesses. He's wont to reneg on contracts after the job was completed, because it wasn't up to his level. Then sue you in court over the remainder of his debt.
Proving citizenship is required. Releasing tax returns, while considered a norm, is NOT required.
Yet, lying is considered just fine by some. Not just lying, but lying about classified e-mails, and each time she gets caught, she adds more lies.
Weird how some ignore that.........OR, they attempt to take the angle of "yeah, but, but, but", it's not so bad. So, she lied. About e-mails. She lied about classified e-mails. She lied about how many devices she used. She had most of her devices smashed. She deleted 10's of thousands of e-mails, some of which are now showing up, PROVING that she lied, that she did in FACT hide things.
And the old "I'm entitled" hag has the nerve to say Trump is hiding something?
It's because (for whatever reason) business owners do no wrong in the eyes of some. It's always the big bad government.
Nah, business owners can do wrong. Just as anyone can. Problem is, when business owners get caught doing wrong, they pay the price. "
You must not know how The Don runs his businesses. He's wont to reneg on contracts after the job was completed, because it wasn't up to his level. Then sue you in court over the remainder of his debt.
And, if he wins in a court of law, he wins. If he loses, he loses. That's kinda how the court of law is supposed to work, isn't it?
