Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
i miss sheard for sure. We could use Mack and Schwartz obviously.

I don't think we miss Kruger or Gipson as of yet (based on how they've played)


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
You don't think we miss Gipson? Seriously?

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
M
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 9,145
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
You don't think we miss Gipson? Seriously?


Boy I do. That guy hit hard.


WE DON'T NEED A QB BEFORE WE GET A LINE THAT CAN PROTECT HIM
my two cents...
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
again gipson didn't want to stay and we had no way to make him stay unless we severely overpaid him. With his injury history that would have been a risk not worth taking imho.

I mean these players are not complete slaves. If they want to leave eventually there is nothing we can do to stop them. I just hope with Hue here that players will WANT to stay.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Originally Posted By: Clemdawg
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Haslam keeps blowing things up and the roster keeps getting re-made. It's why we are perpetual losers.


yup.

You and I have had many talks about this over the years.
It's sooo hard to be a fan of this team.

I bet this team would be a contender if we just stick with this regime for 5 years.

In it's history, every Browns head coach who got 5 years got the team into the playoffs.


#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: ddubia
Originally Posted By: Clemdawg
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Haslam keeps blowing things up and the roster keeps getting re-made. It's why we are perpetual losers.


yup.

You and I have had many talks about this over the years.
It's sooo hard to be a fan of this team.

I bet this team would be a contender if we just stick with this regime for 5 years.

In it's history, every Browns head coach who got 5 years got the team into the playoffs.


How successful were they in the first few years though? Guys who are going to be good usually start out pretty quick. The reason they got five years is probably because they had early success.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
W L T Div. Finish Playoffs PF PA PD Coaches AV Passer Rusher Receiver Pts Yds Pts Yds T/G Pts± Yds± out of MoV SoS SRS OSRS DSRS
2016 NFL Cleveland Browns 0 4 0 4th of 4 74 115 -41 Jackson Kessler Crowell Pryor 26 12 27 22 18 31 16 32 -10.3 6.4 -3.8 -0.4 -3.5
2015 NFL Cleveland Browns 3 13 0 4th of 4 278 432 -154 Pettine Thomas McCown Crowell Barnidge 30 25 29 27 28 32 28 32 -9.6 3.5 -6.1 -3.2 -2.9
2014 NFL Cleveland Browns 7 9 0 4th of 4 299 337 -38 Pettine Thomas Hoyer West Hawkins 27 23 9 23 9 25 26 32 -2.4 -1.5 -3.9 -4.8 0.9
2013 NFL Cleveland Browns 4 12 0 4th of 4 308 406 -98 Chudzinski Haden Campbell McGahee Gordon 27 18 23 9 25 27 15 32 -6.1 -1.6 -7.7 -4.8 -2.9
2012 NFL Cleveland Browns 5 11 0 4th of 4 302 368 -66 Shurmur Thomas Weeden Richardson Gordon 24 25 19 23 12 24 29 32 -4.1 -1.2 -5.3 -4.6 -0.7
2011 NFL Cleveland Browns 4 12 0 4th of 4 218 307 -89 Shurmur Jackson McCoy Hillis Little 30 29 5 10 13 27 28 32 -5.6 0.2 -5.4 -7.2 1.8
2010 NFL Cleveland Browns 5 11 0 3rd of 4 271 332 -61 Mangini Thomas McCoy Hillis Watson 31 29 13 22 15 23 28 32 -3.8 2.3 -1.5 -3.4 2.0
2009 NFL Cleveland Browns 5 11 0 4th of 4 245 375 -130 Mangini Thomas Quinn Harrison Massaquoi 29 32 21 31 29 27 32 32 -8.1 -0.3 -8.4 -6.0 -2.4
2008 NFL Cleveland Browns 4 12 0 4th of 4 232 350 -118 Crennel Rogers Anderson Lewis Edwards 30 31 16 26 8 27 31 32 -7.4 2.7 -4.6 -5.2 0.6
2007 NFL Cleveland Browns 10 6 0 2nd of 4 402 382 20 Crennel Anderson Anderson Lewis Edwards 8 8 21 30 19 14 20 32 1.3 -2.3 -1.1 2.2 -3.3
2006 NFL Cleveland Browns 4 12 0 4th of 4 238 356 -118 Crennel Jones Frye Droughns Edwards 30 31 22 27 31 30 32 32 -7.4 1.5 -5.8 -4.5 -1.3
2005 NFL Cleveland Browns 6 10 0 4th of 4 232 301 -69 Crennel Droughns Dilfer Droughns Bryant 32 26 11 16 23 22 26 32 -4.3 0.1 -4.2 -6.0 1.7
2004 NFL Cleveland Browns 4 12 0 4th of 4 276 390 -114 Davis,Robiskie Lang Garcia Suggs Northcutt 27 28 24 15 26 30 28 32 -7.1 3.7 -3.4 -1.5 -1.9
2003 NFL Cleveland Browns 5 11 0 4th of 4 254 322 -68 Davis Lang Holcomb Green Northcutt 29 26 12 15 28 24 25 32 -4.3 1.3 -2.9 -5.3 2.4
2002 NFL Cleveland Browns* 9 7 0 2nd of 4 Lost WC 344 320 24 Davis Holmes Couch Green Morgan 19 23 10 21 18 15 21 32 1.5 -0.3 1.2 -0.4 1.7
2001 NFL Cleveland Browns 7 9 0 3rd of 6 285 319 -34 Davis Miller Couch Jackson Johnson 25 31 15 22 7 19 30 31 -2.1 1.3 -0.8 -0.9 0.1
2000 NFL Cleveland Browns 3 13 0 6th of 6 161 419 -258 Palmer Ellsworth Couch Prentice Johnson 31 31 27 26 19 31 31 31 -16.1 1.5 -14.6 -9.1 -5.5
1999 NFL Cleveland Browns 2 14 0 6th of 6 217 437 -220 Palmer Couch Couch Kirby Johnson 31 31 29 31 28 31 31 31 -13.8 -0.3 -14.1 -7.6 -6.5
1995 NFL Cleveland Browns 5 11 0 4th of 5 289 356 -67 Belichick Testaverde Testaverde Hoard Jackson 25 21 20 24 25 24 24 30 -4.2 0.4 -3.8 -3.2 -0.6
1994 NFL Cleveland Browns* 11 5 0 2nd of 4 Lost Div 340 204 136 Belichick Turner Testaverde Hoard Alexander 11 16 1 7 20 3 13 28 8.5 -1.2 7.3 1.2 6.1
1993 NFL Cleveland Browns 7 9 0 3rd of 4 304 307 -3 Belichick Metcalf Testaverde Vardell Jackson 15 20 17 12 25 16 17 28 -0.2 -1.0 -1.2 -0.6 -0.6
1992 NFL Cleveland Browns 7 9 0 3rd of 4 272 275 -3 Belichick Johnson Tomczak Mack Jackson 20 18 10 14 10 13 15 28 -0.2 -0.8 -1.0 -2.0 1.0
1991 NFL Cleveland Browns 6 10 0 3rd of 4 293 298 -5 Belichick Kosar Kosar Mack Slaughter 16 19 14 18 3 16 19 28 -0.3 -0.0 -0.4 -0.7 0.4
1990 NFL Cleveland Browns 3 13 0 4th of 4 228 462 -234 Carson,Shofner Perry Kosar Mack Slaughter 27 25 28 17 28 27 25 28 -14.6 1.7 -13.0 -5.2 -7.8
1989 NFL Cleveland Browns* 9 6 1 1st of 4 Lost Conf 334 254 80 Carson Perry Kosar Metcalf Slaughter 14 16 4 7 7 8 13 28 5.0 -0.6 4.4 -0.2 4.6
1988 NFL Cleveland Browns* 10 6 0 2nd of 4 Lost WC 304 288 16 Schottenheimer Minnifield Kosar Byner Langhorne 20 18 6 6 17 13 10 28 1.0 -0.5 0.5 -3.5 4.0
1987 NFL Cleveland Browns* 10 5 0 1st of 4 Lost Conf 390 239 151 Schottenheimer Dixon Kosar Mack Slaughter 3 9 2 3 8 2 2 28 10.1 0.7 10.8 5.3 5.5
1986 NFL Cleveland Browns* 12 4 0 1st of 4 Lost Conf 391 310 81 Schottenheimer Dixon Kosar Mack Brennan 5 9 11 19 4 6 13 28 5.1 -1.4 3.6 2.9 0.7
1985 NFL Cleveland Browns* 8 8 0 1st of 4 Lost Div 287 294 -7 Schottenheimer Golic Kosar Mack Newsome 23 21 7 9 27 15 16 28 -0.4 -0.8 -1.3 -4.7 3.4
1984 NFL Cleveland Browns 5 11 0 3rd of 4 250 297 -47 Schottenheimer,Rutigliano Matthews McDonald Green Newsome 25 24 6 2 18 21 10 28 -2.9 -0.8 -3.8 -6.1 2.3
Points Top Players Off Rank Def Rank Overall Rank Simple Rating System
Year Lg Tm W L T Div. Finish Playoffs PF PA PD Coaches AV Passer Rusher Receiver Pts Yds Pts Yds T/G Pts± Yds± out of MoV SoS SRS OSRS DSRS
1983 NFL Cleveland Browns 9 7 0 2nd of 4 356 342 14 Rutigliano Banks Sipe Pruitt Newsome 13 10 14 9 19 11 7 28 0.9 -3.1 -2.2 -0.9 -1.3
1982 NFL Cleveland Browns* 4 5 0 3rd of 4 Lost WC 140 182 -42 Rutigliano Banks Sipe Pruitt Newsome 23 17 17 23 7 24 26 28 -4.7 1.2 -3.5 -5.0 1.5
1981 NFL Cleveland Browns 5 11 0 4th of 4 276 375 -99 Rutigliano Sipe Sipe Pruitt Newsome 24 4 23 16 28 26 7 28 -6.2 -0.3 -6.5 -4.1 -2.4
1980 NFL Cleveland Browns* 11 5 0 1st of 4 Lost Div 357 310 47 Rutigliano Sipe Sipe Pruitt Logan 8 5 12 23 10 10 14 28 2.9 -1.1 1.8 1.7 0.1
1979 NFL Cleveland Browns 9 7 0 3rd of 4 359 352 7 Rutigliano Pruitt Sipe Pruitt Logan 9 3 20 24 26 15 12 28 0.4 2.6 3.0 2.9 0.1
1978 NFL Cleveland Browns 8 8 0 3rd of 4 334 356 -22 Rutigliano

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle/

I don't see alot of fast starts. but I do see a couple of coaches that did or they took over a decent team to begin with.


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Look it up. I did several years ago and posted it on here. I'm not about to do all that again, but the info is available if you're really interested, most of it on ClevelandBrowns.com


#gmstrong
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
mac, you think one year is enough to properly evaluate a guy?

I don't wanna get into this Banner thing, but it kills me that guys who hated him love Sashi and what the new FO is doing.


A year is not enough to evaluate a guy..."completely".

But there are things that begin show once an individual is given power. These are usually things that are not seen by the public and sometimes the public is blindsided by a sudden change.

IMO, some of the flaws that showed up for Banner in Philly, occurred again here in Cleveland, leading to his dismissal.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
Originally Posted By: Clemdawg
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Haslam keeps blowing things up and the roster keeps getting re-made. It's why we are perpetual losers.


yup.

You and I have had many talks about this over the years.
It's sooo hard to be a fan of this team.

I bet this team would be a contender if we just stick with this regime for 5 years.


If we stayed with Farmer, who knows what mess ups, hotheads, drug addicts, female beaters and etc he would've drafted. He would've buried us deeper. We would absolutely not be a contender, everyone he's drafted pretty much is a fail. Everyone he's signed, almost the same.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,275
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,275
Originally Posted By: ddubia
Look it up. I did several years ago and posted it on here. I'm not about to do all that again, but the info is available if you're really interested, most of it on ClevelandBrowns.com


A fast start doesn't have to be wins...either you see it or you don't. We are seeing it now...just needs to keep getting better.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,926
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,926
Once again. There is no way in hell to retain players that don't want to stay here. There is nothing anyone can do if a player truly wants to go to another team. Only winning will retain these players. We aren't doing that, we never have since the return.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Once again. There is no way in hell to retain players that don't want to stay here. There is nothing anyone can do if a player truly wants to go to another team. Only winning will retain these players. We aren't doing that, we never have since the return.


While eminently true, as was the case with Mack, Benji (more about the money) and possibly Gipson, I think the argument is about letting good players walk who would have stayed had offers been made, like with Sheard and Schwartz.

In Schwartz' case the offer was pulled because he dared look elsewhere. A completely ego driven mistake, IMO.

In Gipson's case, I think an offer should have been made a year earlier. Again, JMHO. And I do realize there were injury concerns, and a fall off in production the following year, however, had the offer been made in advance of his contract year, there would have been less rancor, and we may actually have a safety threat in the backfield this year. The Gipson case is a possibly a good example of FO's outsmarting themselves due to lack of FO continuity. Now we don't know if he'd be healthy and performing at a high level for us this year, but it's an intriguing question.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I am so tired of that argument. Have any of you had a personal conversation w/these players?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720
Originally Posted By: CalDawg
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Once again. There is no way in hell to retain players that don't want to stay here. There is nothing anyone can do if a player truly wants to go to another team. Only winning will retain these players. We aren't doing that, we never have since the return.


While eminently true, as was the case with Mack, Benji (more about the money) and possibly Gipson, I think the argument is about letting good players walk who would have stayed had offers been made, like with Sheard and Schwartz.

In Schwartz' case the offer was pulled because he dared look elsewhere. A completely ego driven mistake, IMO.

In Gipson's case, I think an offer should have been made a year earlier. Again, JMHO. And I do realize there were injury concerns, and a fall off in production the following year, however, had the offer been made in advance of his contract year, there would have been less rancor, and we may actually have a safety threat in the backfield this year. The Gipson case is a possibly a good example of FO's outsmarting themselves due to lack of FO continuity. Now we don't know if he'd be healthy and performing at a high level for us this year, but it's an intriguing question.


The funny thing about this as that some posters on this board think they know more about what the players were thinking than Joe Thomas knows about it.

Seems to me that Joe Thomas would know more about his team mates than people can conjure up on a message board. It seems to me Joe Thomas knows we could have kept many FA's no matter how some stomp their heels and claim it couldn't be done.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
Originally Posted By: CalDawg
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Once again. There is no way in hell to retain players that don't want to stay here. There is nothing anyone can do if a player truly wants to go to another team. Only winning will retain these players. We aren't doing that, we never have since the return.


While eminently true, as was the case with Mack, Benji (more about the money) and possibly Gipson, I think the argument is about letting good players walk who would have stayed had offers been made, like with Sheard and Schwartz.

In Schwartz' case the offer was pulled because he dared look elsewhere. A completely ego driven mistake, IMO.

In Gipson's case, I think an offer should have been made a year earlier. Again, JMHO. And I do realize there were injury concerns, and a fall off in production the following year, however, had the offer been made in advance of his contract year, there would have been less rancor, and we may actually have a safety threat in the backfield this year. The Gipson case is a possibly a good example of FO's outsmarting themselves due to lack of FO continuity. Now we don't know if he'd be healthy and performing at a high level for us this year, but it's an intriguing question.


The funny thing about this as that some posters on this board think they know more about what the players were thinking than Joe Thomas knows about it.

Seems to me that Joe Thomas would know more about his team mates than people can conjure up on a message board. It seems to me Joe Thomas knows we could have kept many FA's no matter how some stomp their heels and claim it couldn't be done.


That's a bit of a generalization, don't you think? You'd have to take it case by case. Simply because a name is mentioned in an article next to Joe Thomas' name doesn't mean he knows the intimacy of the thinking behind the move of a given player. In general, could more players have been kept? Absolutely. A lot more? Who knows. All of them? No. Would we have wanted to keep them all? Probably not.

Let's look at a couple key paragraphs in the article:

Quote:
"And when you keep doing that over and over again, you really lose all your middle class on your team and so guys like Buster Skrine, Jabaal Sheard, D'Qwell Jackson, Jordan Cameron, Travis Benjamin, those are the guys that they disappeared even though those were the guys that you drafted them, spent the time developing them and right when they're hitting stride in the peaks of their career, they end up going somewhere else and having great success for somebody else."

The list includes one of Thomas' other best friends in center Alex Mack, who's having an excellent season in Atlanta, and safety Tashaun Gipson, who's starting for the Jaguars. Somehow, Thomas has managed to keep his chin up through the mass exodus.


Could we have kept Buster Skrine? Probably. Should we have? Maybe.

Could we have kept Jabaal Sheard? Probably. Should we have? Probably, I'll say yes.

Could we have kept D'Qwell Jackson? Certainly, I'd say. Should we have? Maybe. Maybe not.

Could we have kept Jordan Cameron? Maybe, if we had overpaid him, though probably not. Should we have? No.

Could we have kept Travis Benjamin? Probably, if we had overpaid him. Should we have? No.

Also mentioned are Alex Mack and Tashaun Gipson, though not by Joe, yet it's assumed Joe felt we should have kept them. Why is that assumed? Because his name appears in the article?

Could we have kept Alex Mack? Probably not. Should we have? Not if he didn't want to be here.

Could we have kept Tashaun Gipson? Probably. Should we have? Maybe.

Not mentioned is Mitchell Schwartz. Could we have kept him? Definitely. Should we have? Yes.

So if the point is, were mistakes made? Yes. If the question is, were mistakes made with all those players? The answer would be a resounding, no. Joe was making a point about new regimes and turnovers. That doesn't mean that he firmly believes we should have retained all those players. Perspective needs to be attached case by case. The article failed to do that.


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720
Sure. He knows the players, are friends with many of them, but knows little about it. And people on a message board know the truth.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,693
So in other words, you didn't read the post. thumbsup


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

"I am undeterred and I am undaunted." --Kevin Stefanski

"Big hairy American winning machines." --Baker Mayfield

#gmstrong
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,449
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,449
Sounds like Joe is more open to a trade then ever before...

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,449
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,449
On another note, Deshaun Watson doesn't look NFL ready in the least...

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 802
T
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
T
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 802
There are bad regimes (front office + coach) and there are ones who can get better. A regime that comes in, drafts great and makes all the right moves on the field from the beginning will never be available to us and probably doesn't exist.
I think we can say Ray Farmer was a terrible half of a regime. His early-round draft picking set us back a decade. But Pettine? Given time, patience and players, he might have been successful. Chud might have been, too. And I think the same thing about Hue, only moreso.
Hue makes some bad calls (Malcolm Johnson carry, arghh) , but I can live with that as he grows into the role. Leave him be for several years. The front office should plat it safe and not make reaches in the early rounds. We suck right now, but we are headed in the right direction. Lock Jimmy in the attic until at least 2020.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
Originally Posted By: PerfectSpiral
Once again. There is no way in hell to retain players that don't want to stay here. There is nothing anyone can do if a player truly wants to go to another team. Only winning will retain these players. We aren't doing that, we never have since the return.


spiral...there is one universal language spoken in the NFL.

Had the Browns left the offer on the table that they first offered Schwartz, he would be a Brown.

Had the boys offered Mack a contract superior to the competition, he "might" have stayed too.

Money is "used" to change minds in the NFL, every year.

Sashi did get one thing right when he said this...

"I think it says something to the locker room when you reward guys that do it the right way," Brown said, "and make sure that they understand that being here in Cleveland we want to build through the draft certainly but we also need to retain our guys when we get to free agency."

But, when the Browns refused to sign any of their own, it sent another message to the locker room...C H E A P !

What the Browns owner has not figured out, he has run this franchise down so far that he will have to "show" his players how much he wants them to remain in Cleveland.





FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,275
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,275
Quote:
Had the Browns left the offer on the table that they first offered Schwartz, he would be a Brown.


It's not uncommon for contract offers to have an expiration date...actually, it is quite common.

Quote:
Had the boys offered Mack a contract superior to the competition, he "might" have stayed too.


My recollection is that the Browns did so...and Mack chose not to anyway.

Quote:
Money is "used" to change minds in the NFL, every year.

Sashi did get one thing right when he said this...

"I think it says something to the locker room when you reward guys that do it the right way," Brown said, "and make sure that they understand that being here in Cleveland we want to build through the draft certainly but we also need to retain our guys when we get to free agency."


Yes...refreshing actually.

Quote:
But, when the Browns refused to sign any of their own, it sent another message to the locker room...C H E A P !


They also refuse to sign guys because they don't WANT them or don't think they fit or the guy wants too much money for their blood. None of that is necessarily being - C H E A P.

Quote:
What the Browns owner has not figured out, he has run this franchise down so far that he will have to "show" his players how much he wants them to remain in Cleveland.


It's called a rebuild...the likes of which we have never seen before. Out with the old (except the ones you REALLY want) and in with the new.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
willie...the solution is simple..if a team "wants" a player, they will speak the universal language until their is an agreement.

How badly a team wants a player can be measured by the way contract talks are handled. A front office that says they want re-sign their own free agents, then pulls an offer they had previously made to that player...got to question the integrity of those in charge of the franchise.

A franchise that truly wants a player to remain with his/her team will find a way to get that player signed.

Then there are those who talk about rewarding those players "who do it the right way" and never follow through.

...everyone in the NFL knows who the Browns are...they are CHEAP!


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,440
Originally Posted By: mac


Had the boys offered Mack a contract superior to the competition, he "might" have stayed too.




I agree about Schwartz, but not about this. Mack was gone regardless. We offered him his value, but he wanted to leave.

Plus, he knew Shanny's system was the perfect fit for him. And he's right. He's had a great year thus far.


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I have posted actual quotes from Mack and Sashi that disputes that he was going to leave no matter what.

A bunch of posters repeating the same thing over and over and over doesn't change factual evidence.

Now, I don't know if those comments were sincere.........just as this board does not know that he was gone "no matter what."

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
If the Browns wanted Mack, they would have offered him a contract he could not pass up..that is what it was going to take!

Mack knew about 5 different offensive systems in his time in Cleveland...knowing Shanny or liking his system is a minor consideration.

The Browns set a limit and played hardball with Mack, thinking they had the leverage because they had their first round pick ready to take over Mack's position.

In the long run, the Browns front office misjudged the talent they thought they had to replace Mack and now the Browns are once again looking for a center.

Could have had the best center in the NFL...but the boys judged poorly, losing Mack and Schwartz..btw, the Browns are still looking for a RT. Hopefully the kid the boys drafted..the one who had knee surgery in January..the kid who recovered from cancer..got my fingers crossed that he works out.

If the Browns wanted to keep their offensive line together, they were going to have to pay to do so. In the end, after all the nice words from Sashi, about resigning your own free agents..that was just franchise BS to feed to the media...the Harvard boys re-signed none of the Browns free agents.

...just too damn cheap!


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,001
Mack is just a smart dude saying the right things so as not to burn any bridges. He was NEVER going to stay because he flat out hated playing for Haslam and the merry go round.

What's done is done so let's move on guys. We have a new coach that they have no choice but to keep for a while.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,720
Originally Posted By: CalDawg
So in other words, you didn't read the post. thumbsup


I read your post and you made some very valid points. My response should have included j/c because it was mainly meant for other posters who are not as open minded about this issue.

My bad for the confusion.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,275
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,275
Originally Posted By: mac
A franchise that truly wants a player to remain with his/her team will find a way to get that player signed.


Right...which is EXACTLY what they did.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
Originally Posted By: WSU Willie
Originally Posted By: mac
A franchise that truly wants a player to remain with his/her team will find a way to get that player signed.


Right...which is EXACTLY what they did.


Then we can both agree...this front office not only failed to get their best free agents re-signed..they failed to get any of our free agents signed in 2016...

...despite all talk about building a team via the draft and re-signing your own free agents..that was simply front office PR to make Browns fans believe they tried.

When the front office goes 0-4 (or more) at getting their own free agents re-signed...I would say that front office's performance was as bad as it can get.

Now Browns fans will have to wait a bit to see if Haslam and his boys continue to be "cheap" in 2017.

...we shall see.


FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Originally Posted By: mac
Originally Posted By: WSU Willie
Originally Posted By: mac
A franchise that truly wants a player to remain with his/her team will find a way to get that player signed.


Right...which is EXACTLY what they did.




.this front office not only failed to get their best free agents re-signed..they failed to get any of our free agents signed in 2016...


.


They did not fail had they truly wanted them they would have grossly overpaid...they only failed in your mind.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
They don't have Wentz and they are 0 and 4 and you think they didn't fail? LOL

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
They don't have Wentz and they are 0 and 4 and you think they didn't fail? LOL


You didn't want them to draft Wentz either so did you fail?

They don't have Teddy or Jimmy Clausen either.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Yes, I was wrong. I have already admitted that. Too bad you can't ever admit a FO mistake.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Yes, I was wrong. I have already admitted that. Par for course. thumbsup



Too bad you can't ever admit a FO mistake.


Not sure they have made a mistake yet way way to soon.

Wentz reminds me of DA remember how that turned out?

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,809
Quote:
They did not fail had they truly wanted them they would have grossly overpaid...they only failed in your mind.


vamb..when your front office says...

...“It is important for us to keep our own. I think it says something to the locker room when you reward guys who do it the right way.”...

...then fail to land even one free agent...that is a "total failure"...no way else to spin it.

I have serious concerns that Haslam will spend what is necessary to get Pryor signed.




FOOTBALL IS NOT BASEBALL

Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
Wentz reminds me of DA remember how that turned out?


Quoted for chuckles.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,979
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,979
Quote:
I have serious concerns that Haslam will spend what is necessary to get Pryor signed.


Why are you disregarding all the money he has already spent on FAs?

Kruger, Bryant, Whitner, Dansby, Bowe, extending Haden & Barnidge as examples. Not to mention the $25M he has spent on renovating Berea. A better argument would be the decisions signing some of the players than not spending money.

I want Pryor to say, but it's not as simple as saying signing/not signing Pryor. There are tons of other factors that play into it. I


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Originally Posted By: mac
Quote:
They did not fail had they truly wanted them they would have grossly overpaid...they only failed in your mind.


vamb..when your front office says...

...“It is important for us to keep our own. I think it says something to the locker room when you reward guys who do it the right way.”...

...then fail to land even one free agent...that is a "total failure"...no way else to spin it.

I have serious concerns that Haslam will spend what is necessary to get Pryor signed.





Maybe they didn't fit into their plan because of age, attitude, financial or other reasons. We were not privy to the reasons why the FO didn't throw stupid money to keep those FA. It's only a failure in your minds eye if they achieved their goal it's a win.

If Haslam spends what is necessary to get Pryor signed will that shut you up on this witch hunt or will you continue to nit pick every little move?

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Joe Thomas: On Letting Young Players Get Away

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5