DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Everything Else... Election Thread...you know what? Far too many.

By mentioning Trumps "10 trillion" and supporting the status quo. Hope you don't choke on the sand.

i breathe air, thanks.

I've ANSWERED ALL YOUR QUESTIONS ... i asked u one simple question u still ahven't answered ..

HOW WILL HILLARIES PLAN WORK when she says she is going to create millions of jobs in the small business realm while ADDING REGULATIONS, INCREASING THE MINUMUM WAGE and RAISING TAXES ...

Answer that .. and we can move on ... til then ... quit being a HYPOCRITE ... I asked u this 5 times and still received NO ANSWER ..

SNIFF TEST ALERT ...

yes, all those things you just listed will help

i support more regulations, increasing the minimum wage, and slightly raising taxes.

so why respond to you when you already gave me the answers?

lol.

also, you didn't say why trump adding 10 trillion to the debt is a good thing.

what time did you start drinking?

U forgot about the part where that HELPS CREATE JOBS ...

I'm done with u .. your not worth trying to talk to ...

All u do is insult and quote frankly LIE ...

Good night .. enjoy your evening ..

“We’re going to have to leave it at that and you can take your anger issues and spend some time working on them. . ."

Show me one business who reported a record profit, never dropped their wages, sustained the same amount of benefits for their workers, and hired more positions.

I'll be waiting for an enternity for this answer, and that's because trickle down economics exists as a farce. Sure, it works in theory like communism. It won't work due to human nature basically dictating the greed of everyone.

People on the right were trying to stop what caused the crash a few years before but Maxine Waters and others blocked them from doing anything.

Also, all the policies that made it so easy for people who couldn't afford the mortgages they had began under Carter and were turbo charged under Clinton.

There are none.

Now, as an educator, you figure out why. I'll wait for a week or so.

Lovely update on the Mosul invasion. There is now a GIANT CLOUD OF SULFUR around the area. It is the largest non-volcanic sulfur plume ever measured by satellites.

Jeez

What kind of ordinance discharge does this indicate?

None. ISIS set a sulphur factory on fire.

I'm no military expert, but if I had to guess based on where things are now. ISIS will be eliminated under whoever is the next president. The next president will get more credit than what they deserve.

Thanks. Guess they don't like matches.

Maybe they use the quick light charcoal

I've thought the same thing... for quite some time, now.

Most of these extremist organizations have a viable shelf-life of about 10-20 years. They rise to prominence, declare themselves, and rain terror for about 5-10 years. The rest of the world catches on, and the next 5-10 years is spent dismantling their networks, isolating them into splinter groups, and cutting off 'snake's heads.'

We saw this happen near the end of the POTUS 43 admin, and it culminated with the raid on Abbottabad, Pakistan during the POTUS 44 admin. Exactly 10 years from 9/11.

The same is happening to ISIL, as we speak.

We hear next to nothing about al-Qaeda these days, because they are in a state of disarray. Their infrastructure has been decimated, their top leaders from 15 years ago are all dead, and their footsoldiers are either going home or joining ISIL (or some other fledgling group).

The good news: there is an in-born 'shelf-life' for ALL these extremist groups.

The bad news: if America's foreign policy doesn't change as regards the Middle East, another group will rise up to replace ISIL, once they are dismantled/dispatched. And this next bunch will make ISIL look like a troop of Boy Scouts.

And let's not forget one other extremely important fact:
The people who join these extremist ranks hail from a regional culture that is TRIBAL-BASED. These tribes date back thousands of years, and such in-born 'implicit biases' are hard to overcome. They may form temporary alliances to fight a 'common enemy,' but Hassan will never completely trust Habib, because of what their Great Grandfathers did to each other, back in 1929. Eventually, Hassan and Habib will part ways, over turf wars that pre-date the emergence of their common enemy.

Loosely-based coalitions are easily severed, if The Game against them is well-played.

The West created this problem for themselves, when they tried to annex the Middle East for its oil, post WWII. This problem has been 60+ years in the making. We made ourselves wealthy off this annexation, but that wealth came at a price: we have NEVER been able to "control the natives" who HATE us- for being all up in their lives and their back yards.

Like James Brown once sang: "Pay the cost to be the boss."

__________________


We could fix all this with something seemingly 100% removed from Middle East issues, namely- our national energy policy... but that's a subject for another thread. I hope that some Dawg is bold and brave enough to open that can of worms here at DT. It would be an interesting discussion.

For the time being, I'll just say this:
ISIL is destined to soon be "yesterday's news."

History dictates that this shall come to pass.

And I for one, couldn't be happier.

The institution that rises up to take their place is anyone's guess. One thing is certain: there WILL be another, if we don't change the way we deal with this region.

People are just that predictable.
Us... AND 'them.'

.02

What scares me is that there will be a extremely high body count once this is over. ISIS is about to be finished. They're cowards that will take everyone with them. We are launching an attack on Rama too.

I want to remind the board that while ISIS can be defeated, this isn't an official government we are dealing with.

If you want to reduce the number of terrorist organizations, you have to reduce the reasons why they form in the first place.

For example, firing everybody in the Iraqi army when we invaded was a horrible decision.

We fired everybody, and then want to act all innocent and confused as to why they want us dead.

I thought this was a scud missile

lunch was late.

I think she removed some brain matter

You're suggesting she had some?

Yes before Dorthy dropped the house on her

Anger issues .. *L* ..

I LOVE my country and am PASSIONATE ..

If u define that as anger .. I'M OK WITH THAT ...

I can't even understand the question .. u want to re-phrase it and have it make sense .. THEN MAYBE I CAN ANSWER IT ...

Why would a company with record profits lower there wages?

I think i just got a prety good idea of why your voting for Hillary ..

I got an idea ... cause i'm an ANGRY GENIUS ...

How about NEXT TIME we don't give the MAIN SPONSORS of terrorism 150 BILLION DOLLARS ...

That was BRILLIANT!!!

ANOTHER GREAT MOVE BY oBUMa ... your girl started the negotiations ..

I wonder what % of that ISIS got ...

Or, we can not invade countries based on faulty intelligence in the first place.

just a thought.

Agree 100% ... I actually agree with oBUMa on more things than u would think .. I like he wants us to keep our noses out of other folks business .. we were way to meddlesome even when we could afford to be ..

When i was in my 20's I couldn't understand why we always kept butting in ...

But I'm thinking not giving their biggest sponsors 150 bILLION IS A no-brainer ...

Even Kerry admitted that ISIS and other terror groups got part of that money ...

WE PAID THEM TO KILL US ...

THANKS oBUMa .. THANKS HILLARY ...

it's called negotiations.

typically when dealing with somebody or something, you have to give in order to receive. it's why it's called a "deal".

also: that money was Iranian Money. not US money. Iranian money.

so we negotiated with them and gave them 150 billion dollars of their own money back.

i don't understand how on earth you think that's a bad thing. if anything we fleeced them. We didn't give up much of anything, and in return they can't build any nukes.

ya know, the entire point of the whole issue.

this is why even Russia signed off on this deal, as well as a bunch of other countries that signed the agreement. The Iranian deal is a success.

Love this video ... what she says makes alot of sense ...

http://blakpac.com/blog/2016/10/7/black-female-trump-supporter-leaves-news-anchors-speechless

Donald Trump Says He'll Teach Military Expert 'a Couple of Things' About Mosul

https://gma.yahoo.com/donald-trump-says-...topstories.html

Hillary Clinton asks us to believe her ...

http://thefederalist.com/2016/07/07/watc...illary-clinton/

GOWDY: Good morning, Director Comey. Secretary Clinton said she never sent or received classified information over her private e-mail. Was that true?

COMEY: Our investigation found that there was classified information sent —

GOWDY: So it was not true?

COMEY: That’s what I said.

GOWDY: OK. Well, I’m looking for a little shorter answer so you and I are not here quite as long. Secretary Clinton said there was not marked classified on her e-mails either sent or received, was that true?

COMEY: That’s not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said ‘I did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail, there is no classified material.’ Was that true?

COMEY: There was classified material e-mail.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said she used just one device. Was that true?

COMEY: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of State.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said all work-related e-mails were returned to the State Department. Was that true?

COMEY: No. We found work-related e-mails, thousands that were not returned.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work-related e-mails from her personal account. Was that true?

COMEY: That’s a harder one to answer. We found traces of work related e-mails in — on devices or slack space, whether they were deleted or whether when a server was changed out something happened to them. There’s no doubt that the work-related e-mails that were removed electronically from the — the e-mail system.

GOWDY: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the e-mails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the e-mail content individually?

COMEY: No.

The election is fixed! And we want to read Hillary's personnel emails right now damnit!

Insert crying baby pic here!_________________

I don't know if it matters, but the money we gave them was their own money. We confiscated/froze it sometime back, it may go all the way back to the 80's, not sure.

And while it was returned on Obamas watch, it was going to go back at sometime anyway.

Personally, I still don't like it. But it was their money.

Yes of course, and that is why we had to pay them with Pallets of Cash, Dollars, Euros and Swiss Francs!

Wake up already!

But it wasn't for hostages.

Drink some coffee man!

Uhhh

What did Trump just say about term limits.....?

Tonight's Breaking News on Crooked Hillary...

Hacked Memo Reinforces Worst Perception of the Clintons

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/27/hacked-memo-reinforces-worst-perception-of-the-clintons.html