|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,957
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,957 |
I'll call it right now, if OSU beats UM and PSU goes on to win the Big 10 title game, PSU gets the CFB nod over OSU.
Man, I think just the opposite, if OSU wins out the committee won't keep them out of the playoff even is PSU wins out. They'll tell PSU congrats on a fine season, now go enjoy the Rose Bowl.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,552
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,552 |
I can see big ten getting two teams in if OSU beats UM... PSU or Wisconsin winning the championship should get them in...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,657
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,657 |
Wow I went to dinner and come back and 2,3,4,9 all lose and 3 of them lost to un-ranked teams! What a crazy day...like to see how the committee ranks everyone this week
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." [Mark Twain]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284 |
Maybe MSU can beat PSU in two weeks, but that's unlikely. Maybe PSU loses in the title game, that's more than possible.
I'll call it right now, if OSU beats UM and PSU goes on to win the Big 10 title game, PSU gets the CFB nod over OSU.
Who knows what else happens with the other teams. Maybe OSU gets in as the 4 seed ("at-large") because so many other teams have one loss and their loss is the best, but we'll see. PSU controls their destiny, assuming OSU beats UM.
And it's going to cause the committee to need to review the importance of winning a conference versus fielding the 4 best teams.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
I'll call it right now, if OSU beats UM and PSU goes on to win the Big 10 title game, PSU gets the CFB nod over OSU.
Man, I think just the opposite, if OSU wins out the committee won't keep them out of the playoff even is PSU wins out. They'll tell PSU congrats on a fine season, now go enjoy the Rose Bowl. As good as OSU would be in that scenario, they'll be idle while PSU is beating a highly ranked Wisconsin team in a Big Ten title game. That is a huge boost. They will jump OSU. I've heard this same argument hundreds of times on this same board. If you don't win your conference or even your own division, how can you make a case to be in the CFP? Heck, especially since PSU beat OSU fair and square.
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,957
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,957 |
No doubt, the UM loss didn't do OSU any favors, but I still can't see them being left out if they win out. The committee knows OSU is a huge $$$$ draw.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,552
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,552 |
I diont think OSU would jump a big ten winner... but I could eee both getting in... two from the big ten, bans, and then probably ACC winner
<><
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
No doubt, the UM loss didn't do OSU any favors, but I still can't see them being left out if they win out. The committee knows OSU is a huge $$$$ draw. I suppose you're right. After all, this is a made-for-TV sports special. They'll want OSU in, but we'll see. Lots of things can happen from here on out. Maybe UM wins in Columbus and makes all of this moot for OSU fans.
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,882 |
I diont think OSU would jump a big ten winner... but I could eee both getting in... two from the big ten, bans, and then probably ACC winner What about if Washington beats a ranked Washington St. and then wins the Pac12 title game against a near 10 ranked Colorado? That's a good resume as well. A 1-loss Power5 champion.
“...Iguodala to Curry, back to Iguodala, up for the layup! Oh! Blocked by James! LeBron James with the rejection!”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,552
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,552 |
West cost bias.. plus I don't think Washington wins out
<><
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
Yea seems like the comittee stays looking for a excuse to kick the PAC-12 out. They found one.
Last edited by Swish; 11/13/16 01:27 AM.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,957
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,957 |
j/c... Lol, ouch..... 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284 |
What happens if Wisconsin beats Penn State in your scenario? Can you claim Wisconsin is better than OSU?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284 |
Also compare strength of schedule and resumes.
OSU will have played 4 top 10 teams. If they get punished for that, say goodbye to marquee matchups early in the year. There will be NO point in having them. Just schedule cupcakes and win your conference.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,328
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,328 |
basically, it's chaos in the big 10 .. and entire NCAAF
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Jeudy is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Tillman is flanked out wide to the right. Judkins and Ford are split in the backfield as Flacco takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,160
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,160 |
Also compare strength of schedule and resumes.
OSU will have played 4 top 10 teams. If they get punished for that, say goodbye to marquee matchups early in the year. There will be NO point in having them. Just schedule cupcakes and win your conference. That is a very good point. Ohio State will have played 5 (at the time they played them) top ten teams and beat them all if they win out. Penn State will have played 2 and lost to one of them. I really don't see how they can put a 2 loss PSU in over the Buckeyes.
And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul. - John Muir
#GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284 |
If they do, the committee needs to just come out and say winning your conference trumps everything else. If OSU beats Michigan, they will have wins against @Wisconsin, @Oklahoma, home against Michigan and Nebraska. Their lone loss was on the road against a top 10 team by 3.
3 top 10, maybe 2 top 5 wins. If that doesn't matter, just toss out strength of schedule as a factor and just schedule cream puffs every year to go undefeated.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,029
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,029 |
wow - OSU has an inroad now if we win out! Regardless of this game, If OSU won out, they would get in. Maybe not. If PSU wins out, OSU doesn't get a chance at a conference championship. OSU has to win out and get in to the Big 10 championship game or they will get passed on the final vote. The Big 10 champ will get in. OSU at 3rd place in the league isn't going to get in as well. Don't let OSU's ranking this week make you all warm and fuzzy. They are on thin ice and need some help to get there.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,160
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,160 |
Candy makes a good point about strength of schedule, though. No one is going to schedule anyone non conference that's worth damn if the league championship is the only criteria needed to make the playoff. I don't think the NCAA wants to see that.
And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul. - John Muir
#GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284 |
I get that Peen. However, as I said. Get ready for cream puff OOC schedules. Teams would be idiotic to schedule a tough OOC team. It would only hurt them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499 |
Agreed.
Another thought is that perhaps the Big 10 gets two teams in? There isn't a team from the SEC other than "Bama that even deserves consideration. The Big 12 sucks, as does the Pac 12. The ACC could also have two deserving teams.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027 |
Pac-12 is a dumpster fire.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284 |
Pac-12 is a dumpster fire. Washington State is now ahead of Washington in the PAC 12
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027 |
Pac-12 is a dumpster fire. Washington State is now ahead of Washington in the PAC 12 God bless Mike Leach. I've been very against teams that don't win conferences getting into championship games/playoff games... I was against Michigan getting a spot in 2006, LSU back in 2011... but if it's going to happen, it could be this year with a few teams, and yes one of them being Ohio State.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,612
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,612 |
I don't recall ever seeing such a slaughter of top-ten teams on the same day before.
It was a massacre.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,328
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,328 |
AP Poll after Week 11: 1. Alabama 2. Ohio St 3. Louisville 4. Michigan 5. Clemson 6. Wisconsin 7. Washington 8. Oklahoma 9. Penn St 10. WVU
"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Jeudy is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Tillman is flanked out wide to the right. Judkins and Ford are split in the backfield as Flacco takes the snap ... Here we go."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,936
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,936 |
Question for everyone.
When evaluating a teams strength of schedule, do you look at how a team was ranked at the time they played or at the end of the season?
Say in week #2 you beat a top 5 team. But they end up losing 3 games and finish ranked #15. Then you beat a team in week #3 that was ranked #22 at the time but ends up with only 2 losses and finish up ranked #10 overall.
Which is the more impressive victory?
The difference between Jesus and religion Religion mocks you for having dirty feet Jesus gets down on his knees and washes them
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870 |
Week 12 AP Poll
1. Alabama 2. Ohio St 3. Louisville 4. Michigan 5. Clemson 6. Wisconsin 7. Washington 8. Oklahoma 9. Penn St 10. West Va.
You know my love will Not Fade Away.........
#gmSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027 |
Question for everyone.
When evaluating a teams strength of schedule, do you look at how a team was ranked at the time they played or at the end of the season?
Say in week #2 you beat a top 5 team. But they end up losing 3 games and finish ranked #15. Then you beat a team in week #3 that was ranked #22 at the time but ends up with only 2 losses and finish up ranked #10 overall.
Which is the more impressive victory? At the time rankings mean squat to me. If you beat a team ranked #22 and they finish top 10, that's better than beating a fraud who was ranked #3 at the time. Just look at Wisconsin and their early season win over MSU. At the time, that was HUGE, but it looks like another game right now. Although you can also say their win against LSU was huge at the time, then it looked like crap, and now, it's a decent win. I'm huge on resume, which is why I really think it's hard to talk about a team getting in without a conference title. Resume is nice to talk about during the season, because it's great fodder, and it's what makes college football different than anything else, but realistically it shouldn't be looked at until the end of the year. For Ohio State, they have a win over now #6 Wisconsin #8 Oklahoma, #19 Nebraska and should they beat a 1-loss UM, probably another top ten team. Even without the conference title, the possibility of 3 top ten teams in your resume is impressive. The biggest thing is that Wisconsin wins the B1G if you don't make it. That strengthens your resume. The other huge thing is that Oklahoma looks like they are going to win the Big 12. With a road win against them that could bode well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,936
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,936 |
I tend to agree, but I see a lot of comments about "they" beat "so-and-so" who was ranked "x at the time".
Occasionally on this board but frequently by the "experts"
Last edited by Jester; 11/13/16 03:55 PM.
The difference between Jesus and religion Religion mocks you for having dirty feet Jesus gets down on his knees and washes them
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027 |
I tend to agree, but I see a lot of comments about "they" beat "so-and-so" who was ranked "x at the time".
Occasionally on this board but frequently by the "experts" Yup, a lot of college fans in general like to make those arguments. It just takes a bit of common sense to realize if you beat a team in the early weeks, their ranking may not matter. I'm really glad the committee waits until the 8th week or whatever to put out their list. There is no reason to have an official rankings poll in September.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341 |
They need at least 8 teams in the playoffs and 1 loss wouldn't kill a top team ... JMHO 
John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,612
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,612 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,612
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,612 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,160
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,160 |
Question for everyone.
When evaluating a teams strength of schedule, do you look at how a team was ranked at the time they played or at the end of the season?
Say in week #2 you beat a top 5 team. But they end up losing 3 games and finish ranked #15. Then you beat a team in week #3 that was ranked #22 at the time but ends up with only 2 losses and finish up ranked #10 overall.
Which is the more impressive victory? At the time rankings mean squat to me. If you beat a team ranked #22 and they finish top 10, that's better than beating a fraud who was ranked #3 at the time. Just look at Wisconsin and their early season win over MSU. At the time, that was HUGE, but it looks like another game right now. Although you can also say their win against LSU was huge at the time, then it looked like crap, and now, it's a decent win. I'm huge on resume, which is why I really think it's hard to talk about a team getting in without a conference title. Resume is nice to talk about during the season, because it's great fodder, and it's what makes college football different than anything else, but realistically it shouldn't be looked at until the end of the year. For Ohio State, they have a win over now #6 Wisconsin #8 Oklahoma, #19 Nebraska and should they beat a 1-loss UM, probably another top ten team. Even without the conference title, the possibility of 3 top ten teams in your resume is impressive. The biggest thing is that Wisconsin wins the B1G if you don't make it. That strengthens your resume. The other huge thing is that Oklahoma looks like they are going to win the Big 12. With a road win against them that could bode well. I agree that rankings should be weighted toward games played later in the season, but let's say a team is ranked top ten at the time you beat them. They then drop considerably due to that particular loss. I think you do sometimes have to consider their ranking at the time the game is played.
And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul. - John Muir
#GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027 |
Question for everyone.
When evaluating a teams strength of schedule, do you look at how a team was ranked at the time they played or at the end of the season?
Say in week #2 you beat a top 5 team. But they end up losing 3 games and finish ranked #15. Then you beat a team in week #3 that was ranked #22 at the time but ends up with only 2 losses and finish up ranked #10 overall.
Which is the more impressive victory? At the time rankings mean squat to me. If you beat a team ranked #22 and they finish top 10, that's better than beating a fraud who was ranked #3 at the time. Just look at Wisconsin and their early season win over MSU. At the time, that was HUGE, but it looks like another game right now. Although you can also say their win against LSU was huge at the time, then it looked like crap, and now, it's a decent win. I'm huge on resume, which is why I really think it's hard to talk about a team getting in without a conference title. Resume is nice to talk about during the season, because it's great fodder, and it's what makes college football different than anything else, but realistically it shouldn't be looked at until the end of the year. For Ohio State, they have a win over now #6 Wisconsin #8 Oklahoma, #19 Nebraska and should they beat a 1-loss UM, probably another top ten team. Even without the conference title, the possibility of 3 top ten teams in your resume is impressive. The biggest thing is that Wisconsin wins the B1G if you don't make it. That strengthens your resume. The other huge thing is that Oklahoma looks like they are going to win the Big 12. With a road win against them that could bode well. I agree that rankings should be weighted toward games played later in the season, but let's say a team is ranked top ten at the time you beat them. They then drop considerably due to that particular loss. I think you do sometimes have to consider their ranking at the time the game is played. You don't really see teams in the top ten drop considerably though. Michigan dropped 2 spots (albeit, a bunch of other teams in the top 5 lost) Nebraska dropped 9 spots after losing to OSU, but they were bludgeoned in that game.. I think it's just a lot easier to look at the end of the year, who you beat, and where they are currently ranked. You have a better idea of how tough a road teams had. This playoff picture is going to be so interesting though. We may as well pencil Alabama into the game. They aren't losing on Saturday, and they get Auburn at home in the Iron Bowl. Even if they lose that game, they're in the SEC championship and would still get in with a conference title over what will be a weak SEC East opponent.. The Big Ten winner is in. As of right now that could be quite a few teams. The ACC could get shut out if the Coastal division opponent beats what is still likely to be Clemson in the title game. I think Clemson still gets in with a conference title. That's where everything gets crazy. The Big 12 is an interesting conference. Oklahoma has two tough remaining games. I know it's not a great conference, but there are some interesting storylines, and at 8-1, West Virginia is kinda hiding out in the weeds. They have a huge game with Oklahoma on Saturday in their barn. That's going to be one hell of a game... I'm trying to come up with a list of the most likely teams to make the playoff, and it is really tough... I think right now it would go Alabama 1 by a mile (they can lose and still get in realistically) and Clemson who still controls their own destiny. After that it is a mishmosh of Big Ten teams This is going to be some of the best conversation over the next few weeks!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,029
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,029 |
I get that Peen. However, as I said. Get ready for cream puff OOC schedules. Teams would be idiotic to schedule a tough OOC team. It would only hurt them. You need both. Don't get me wrong. I am just saying don't be blind to the fact that if PSU wins out, OSU is probabaly out. I am not hating on OSU as some will probably claim. I am just saying OSU has a tough road in to the final 4 in the BCS....or "BS"C as I say, if they don't make the Big 10 championship. Think about it.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 17,284 |
Peen, I don't fail to realize they are in trouble. However, it's going to set an interesting precedent. Is it the best 4 teams or winners from the best 4 conferences?
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum College Football Discussion
|
|