Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 9 10
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,962
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,962
Just clicking,, is anyone else thinking that a rumor doesn't deserve this much attention LOL


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
We need to get our QB...with RG3 planned to start and Kessler a decent back up QB. The drafted QB would be able to sit at least for a while in the 2017 season.

Trub at #1 or Watson at #12, or pre draft trade for JG...I think those are our only options that will help us at QB.
jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 891
D
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
D
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 891
I never compared anybody to anybody. I'm just saying what if there are players rated higher then the QBs are at 12. Maybe for example they only have late first round early second round grades on those guys, you wouldn't reach and you wouldn't trade a first round pick for a guy you think is only worth a second.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,341
Originally Posted By: eotab
We need to get our QB...with RG3 planned to start and Kessler a decent back up QB. The drafted QB would be able to sit at least for a while in the 2017 season.

Trub at #1 or Watson at #12, or pre draft trade for JG...I think those are our only options that will help us at QB.
jmho


If they like Trubisky @ 1 I would be ok with that pick ... Remember we still have another 1st Rd. Pick +2 2nds thumbsup


John 3:16 Jesus said "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 891
D
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
D
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 891
Just spit balling here, but what about another backup QB on someones roster? I.E. Brett Hundley, could see him being good fit for what Hue wants to do with his QB. I know he hasn't played in a regular season game like Garrapolo, but could be considerable cheaper. He's looked very good at times in the preseason. There is potential there. If you can think of anyone else bring them up.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,197

McCown has earned a high level of respect from every place he has played.

He has always been perceived as a true professional.

It is great that he has provided confirmation on the potential of Garoppolo.

This Board has been all over the place. Some pro JG. Some against. Some undecided.

Before this all began it was my hope the Browns would get Garoppolo and a impact pass rusher. I am big on Solomon Thomas. However, I would differ to Garrett.

Garoppolo represents our best chance to get better quicker. He has already gone through the learning curve.

I would feel really good coming out of the first round with Garoppolo and Garrett.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,363
H
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,363
IMO if we are thinking about a QB at # 12 then JG is worth the 12th pick too. I don't believe we should take any QB with our 1st pick but at # 12 I'm ok with it if the Browns feel there is one that is worth it. Mahomes in the 2nd round might be a good option also.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: dean_fairchild
Just spit balling here, but what about another backup QB on someones roster? I.E. Brett Hundley, could see him being good fit for what Hue wants to do with his QB. I know he hasn't played in a regular season game like Garrapolo, but could be considerable cheaper. He's looked very good at times in the preseason. There is potential there. If you can think of anyone else bring them up.


Hundley was horrible at just about everything a pro QB needs to be able to do his senior year (move in the pocket, feel pressure, read coverage, etc.).

With that said, he is physically very gifted and has been in the pros for two years now. Everything that people say about him points to him being a hard worker.

I would only want him, but only if we struck on literally everyone else pre-draft. Griffin is bad, I don't think there is anyway Hundley couldn't beat him out.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
R
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
If we can walk away from the first round with Garrett/Allen and Jimmy G. then I will go nuts with joy for this draft.

If we can land Jimmy G. without giving up a first this year then I will be in cloud 9.

I'd also be happy with Trub at 12 if some miracle happens that he is sitting there. I'd be annoyed if we took him at #1.

Man I would love to have both Garrett and Jimmy on our team though =)


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
Originally Posted By: edromeo
There's a lot of points expressed in your last post. Some I agree with many I don't. But the post is too long and most of it is too off topic to reply in this thread...ie Trubisky, Watson etc....

So I will focus on your comments about Garoppolo. Beware: I'm not making any overarching statement about Garoppolo I'm responding specifically to one statement that you made. I am not denying that he has good ball placement. But he only has a two-game sample size. I don't see how anyone can reasonably support the opinion that he has easily one of the best ball placement in the league.



Yeah there is plenty we don't agree on and it's no big deal.

Jimmy G. has had great ball placement all through college and when he has played in NFL games he has shown he still has it.

See the thing about ball placement is level of competition has zero to do with it. You can either throw it to the right spot or you can't. Not only can Jimmy do it but he does it consistently and has been for a long time. I think it's very easy to trust that this part of his game won't suddenly go away if he puts on a Browns uniform. IF they can keep him on his feet for 2.5 seconds then that ball is going where he wants it to go and going there the way he wants it to go most of the time. Sometimes he gets too excited and overthrows a deep ball from time to time but all QBs do that sometimes
Its a far cry from what you're saying above to saying he has one of the best ball placement in the league.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
R
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
There is no such thing as an NFL QB who doesn't overthrow the deep ball from time to time. Even Tom Brady and aaron rodgers do it.

Here is a fun idea for you. Watch videos of 2 of your favorite QBs. As you're watching keep a tally. One for when the ball lands right in their hands, another when its catchable after the receiver adjust to catch it, and 1 where the ball is uncatchable. Throw away the passes or keep a separate tally of when the QB throws it away. Then do the same with Jimmy G. For instance use Watson's best game in college and jimmy G.'s best game in college or Jimmy G.'s two nfl starts. This is a stat that to me shows their real accuracy. We can't rely on them to have a good WR corps but if we have a guy that can put it right in their hands then we have a shot. I might do it myself later this week just for fun =)


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Razor.

You are jumping all over the place and responding to your own comments and avoiding directly addressing your hyperbolic comment that Jimmy has one of the best ball placement in the league.

I'm still waiting for your response to the last post in the Watson film thread.

Last edited by edromeo; 02/10/17 08:52 PM.
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
R
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
I wasn't being hyperbolic. I genuinely feel that way about his ball placement skills. Even before he was drafted I wanted him because of his elite ball placement. I mean he is just freaking good at putting the ball in the perfect spot. There have been plenty of pro scouts that said the same thing so its not like I am saying anything new here. I didn't avoid your question/comment at all. I even gave a way to let you see what I see.

I'll have to go back to the Watson thread this week. I appologize because I just forgot about it. I didn't mean any disrespect.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I wasn't being hyperbolic. I genuinely feel that way about his ball placement skills. Even before he was drafted I wanted him because of his elite ball placement. I mean he is just freaking good at putting the ball in the perfect spot. There have been plenty of pro scouts that said the same thing so its not like I am saying anything new here. I didn't avoid your question/comment at all.
Again, saying he has good ball placement or you like his ball placement is quite different then saying:
Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
.... The main reason is that he has superb ball placement. It's easily one of the best in the NFL IMHO.
^^If this isn't the definition of hyperbolic I don't know what is.

Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
There have been plenty of pro scouts that said the same thing
Please show me where 1 scout said the SAME things as what you said in the quoted portion above.


Originally Posted By: Razorthorns
I'll have to go back to the Watson thread this week. I appologize because I just forgot about it. I didn't mean any disrespect.
No worries. I only mentioned the Watson film thread again because you mentioned doing another QB evaluation project/discussion and we never finished the 1st one.

Last edited by edromeo; 02/10/17 11:16 PM.
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041
E
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
E
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 4,041


Originally Posted By: also from the article
McCown has also been impressed with another quarterback -- Tyrod Taylor of the Bills. Hue Jackson just hired Taylor's former quarterbacks coach David Lee. The Browns will be interested if Taylor is released before his 2017 salary of $15.5 million is guaranteed March 11.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,674
Accuracy:

Houston Texans Head Coach Bill O' Brien when asked what he looks for in a Quarterback stated: " Number one, and don't laugh, they've got to be able to throw the ball accurately. If you tell them to put it somewhere, they've got to be able to put it there, and they've got to be able to work at it to improve their accuracy." In 2013, Garoppolo had a 66% completion percentage. To put that in perspective, Peyton Manning last year had a 68% completion percentage in his record breaking season. As O' Brien mentioned, accuracy is a necessity for Quarterbacks and Garoppolo displays it tremendously.

Arm Strength:

The biggest knock on Garoppolo that has refrained him from being a top 20 pick is his arm strength. Garoppolo lacks the cannon arm that NFL scouts love. His lack of velocity will give defensive backs more time to break on the football. As a result, unless Garoppolo makes intelligent decisions, he will be frequently intercepted. Luckily, next to Teddy Bridgewater, Garoppolo is the most intelligent Quarterback in the draft.

Intelligence:

The biggest aspect that Bill O' Brien assesses in Quarterbacks is intelligence: "You're seeing man-free, blitz zero. You're seeing blitz zone, from the field, from the boundary. With all that, in my opinion, your quarterback has to be intelligent. He has to have a great football IQ. They've got to be able to make good decisions. They have to be able to be good decision makers." Garoppolo always seems to find the open man as he is adept at reading defenses. Watch Garoppolo's eyes in the Northern Illinois game. His head is constantly scanning through his wide receivers until he finds one open. Rarely does he stare down a receiver making it much harder for defensive backs to read him. Garoppolo is not afraid to check down to the underneath receiver. Instead of forcing a throw, he is fine with checking it down for a five yard gain. Another aspect where Garoppolo excels is keeping his eyes down field when the blitz arrives. Instead of panicking and take a sack, he often finds an open receiver or simply throws it away.

Size:

Listed at 6-2, 226 lbs, Garoppolo has average height and weight for an NFL Quarterback. He has 9 inch hands and 30 inch arms which are typical for a Quarterback. Quarterbacks like Drew Brees and Russell Wilsonhave had tremendous success in the NFL and both are smaller than Garoppolo so his size should not negatively affect his draft stock.

Release:

Another area where Jimmy Garoppolo shines is his release. He might have the fastest release of any Quarterback in the draft. At his pro day, Garoppolo had a private workout with 49ers Head Coach Jim Harbaugh. Afterwards, Harbaugh was asked what he thought of Garoppolo's release: "Quick release, yes." This is a great trait to possess because by getting the ball out his hands quickly, Garoppolo will limit the amount of times he is sacked. In 2013, Garoppolo was only sacked 19 times. To compare, Johnny Manziel who is known for his evasiveness was also sacked 19 times.

Athleticism:

At the NFL Scouting Combine, Garoppolo ran a 4.97 40-yard dash which was one of the slowest times among Quarterbacks. While having an athletic Quarterback is a benefit because it allows Offensive Coordinators to call bootlegs and Quarterback keeps, it is not necessary. Garoppolo makes the majority of his throws from the pocket where elite athleticism is not needed.

Pocket Presence:

Quarterbacks that spend most of their time in the pocket must develop good pocket presence. As mentioned before, Garoppolo was sacked only 19 times last year. He navigates the pocket well and steps up when pressured from the outside. But what is important is that while Garoppolo avoids defenders, he keeps his eyes down field looking for open Wide Receivers. His shuffles his feet quickly like Peyton Manning does which allows him to scan the field faster.

Leadership:

Quarterbacks are often asked to provide leadership not just for the offense, but for the entire team. The Quarterbacks in the NFL that do not succeed often never step into that role. But for Jimmy Garoppolo, he has been Eastern Illinois's leader for 4 years. He is very composed on and off the field. When he does throw an occasional interception, he comes right back with a brilliant throw.

Pro Comparison:

Philip Rivers: While Garoppolo is often compared to Tony Romo, I see a lot of Philip Rivers in him. Both are extremely accurate, smart and are leaders. Both often lack velocity on their throws. Rivers is one of the best Quarterbacks in the NFL so if Garoppolo shares his traits, it means he has serious potential.



http://www.silverandblackpride.com/2014/5/2/5671322/jimmy-garoppolo-scouting-report


I bet you're wondering the samething I did, why O' why didn't I take the...blue pill
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Originally Posted By: dawgpound101
Accuracy:

Houston Texans Head Coach Bill O' Brien when asked what he looks for in a Quarterback stated: " Number one, and don't laugh, they've got to be able to throw the ball accurately. If you tell them to put it somewhere, they've got to be able to put it there, and they've got to be able to work at it to improve their accuracy." In 2013, Garoppolo had a 66% completion percentage. To put that in perspective, Peyton Manning last year had a 68% completion percentage in his record breaking season. As O' Brien mentioned, accuracy is a necessity for Quarterbacks and Garoppolo displays it tremendously.

Arm Strength:

The biggest knock on Garoppolo that has refrained him from being a top 20 pick is his arm strength. Garoppolo lacks the cannon arm that NFL scouts love. His lack of velocity will give defensive backs more time to break on the football. As a result, unless Garoppolo makes intelligent decisions, he will be frequently intercepted. Luckily, next to Teddy Bridgewater, Garoppolo is the most intelligent Quarterback in the draft.

Intelligence:

The biggest aspect that Bill O' Brien assesses in Quarterbacks is intelligence: "You're seeing man-free, blitz zero. You're seeing blitz zone, from the field, from the boundary. With all that, in my opinion, your quarterback has to be intelligent. He has to have a great football IQ. They've got to be able to make good decisions. They have to be able to be good decision makers." Garoppolo always seems to find the open man as he is adept at reading defenses. Watch Garoppolo's eyes in the Northern Illinois game. His head is constantly scanning through his wide receivers until he finds one open. Rarely does he stare down a receiver making it much harder for defensive backs to read him. Garoppolo is not afraid to check down to the underneath receiver. Instead of forcing a throw, he is fine with checking it down for a five yard gain. Another aspect where Garoppolo excels is keeping his eyes down field when the blitz arrives. Instead of panicking and take a sack, he often finds an open receiver or simply throws it away.

Size:

Listed at 6-2, 226 lbs, Garoppolo has average height and weight for an NFL Quarterback. He has 9 inch hands and 30 inch arms which are typical for a Quarterback. Quarterbacks like Drew Brees and Russell Wilsonhave had tremendous success in the NFL and both are smaller than Garoppolo so his size should not negatively affect his draft stock.

Release:

Another area where Jimmy Garoppolo shines is his release. He might have the fastest release of any Quarterback in the draft. At his pro day, Garoppolo had a private workout with 49ers Head Coach Jim Harbaugh. Afterwards, Harbaugh was asked what he thought of Garoppolo's release: "Quick release, yes." This is a great trait to possess because by getting the ball out his hands quickly, Garoppolo will limit the amount of times he is sacked. In 2013, Garoppolo was only sacked 19 times. To compare, Johnny Manziel who is known for his evasiveness was also sacked 19 times.

Athleticism:

At the NFL Scouting Combine, Garoppolo ran a 4.97 40-yard dash which was one of the slowest times among Quarterbacks. While having an athletic Quarterback is a benefit because it allows Offensive Coordinators to call bootlegs and Quarterback keeps, it is not necessary. Garoppolo makes the majority of his throws from the pocket where elite athleticism is not needed.

Pocket Presence:

Quarterbacks that spend most of their time in the pocket must develop good pocket presence. As mentioned before, Garoppolo was sacked only 19 times last year. He navigates the pocket well and steps up when pressured from the outside. But what is important is that while Garoppolo avoids defenders, he keeps his eyes down field looking for open Wide Receivers. His shuffles his feet quickly like Peyton Manning does which allows him to scan the field faster.

Leadership:

Quarterbacks are often asked to provide leadership not just for the offense, but for the entire team. The Quarterbacks in the NFL that do not succeed often never step into that role. But for Jimmy Garoppolo, he has been Eastern Illinois's leader for 4 years. He is very composed on and off the field. When he does throw an occasional interception, he comes right back with a brilliant throw.

Pro Comparison:

Philip Rivers: While Garoppolo is often compared to Tony Romo, I see a lot of Philip Rivers in him. Both are extremely accurate, smart and are leaders. Both often lack velocity on their throws. Rivers is one of the best Quarterbacks in the NFL so if Garoppolo shares his traits, it means he has serious potential.



http://www.silverandblackpride.com/2014/5/2/5671322/jimmy-garoppolo-scouting-report





Good read, Dawg.

Makes one wonder how he lasted so long on draft day cause those comments reek of Top 5 pick.

Go get this dude, Sashi.

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
R
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
he only had one knock and that was he came from a lesser known school. That and you had all the stupid manziel hype along with bridgewater. Carr looked good too but he had confidence issues that many worried about.

and Ed it's not hyperbole when its my genuine opinion. You might not agree with me and your free to do so. I am not exaggerating my views. I am calling it just like I see it.

I'll say it again. In my opinion Jimmy G. has some of the best ball placement in the NFL and it's going to make him one of the TOP QB's in the NFL once he is out from under Tom.

You wanted a link so here you go:

"... his accuracy and ball placement was impressive for a young player acclimating to the pro game."

http://www.patspulpit.com/2016/7/21/12242758/let-s-re-visit-jimmy-garoppolo-s-2015-scouting-report

Anyone who watches Jimmy play is going to notice right away his skills with ball placement.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
R
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,002
Originally Posted By: kwhip
Originally Posted By: dawgpound101
Accuracy:

Houston Texans Head Coach Bill O' Brien when asked what he looks for in a Quarterback stated: " Number one, and don't laugh, they've got to be able to throw the ball accurately. If you tell them to put it somewhere, they've got to be able to put it there, and they've got to be able to work at it to improve their accuracy." In 2013, Garoppolo had a 66% completion percentage. To put that in perspective, Peyton Manning last year had a 68% completion percentage in his record breaking season. As O' Brien mentioned, accuracy is a necessity for Quarterbacks and Garoppolo displays it tremendously.

Arm Strength:

The biggest knock on Garoppolo that has refrained him from being a top 20 pick is his arm strength. Garoppolo lacks the cannon arm that NFL scouts love. His lack of velocity will give defensive backs more time to break on the football. As a result, unless Garoppolo makes intelligent decisions, he will be frequently intercepted. Luckily, next to Teddy Bridgewater, Garoppolo is the most intelligent Quarterback in the draft.

Intelligence:

The biggest aspect that Bill O' Brien assesses in Quarterbacks is intelligence: "You're seeing man-free, blitz zero. You're seeing blitz zone, from the field, from the boundary. With all that, in my opinion, your quarterback has to be intelligent. He has to have a great football IQ. They've got to be able to make good decisions. They have to be able to be good decision makers." Garoppolo always seems to find the open man as he is adept at reading defenses. Watch Garoppolo's eyes in the Northern Illinois game. His head is constantly scanning through his wide receivers until he finds one open. Rarely does he stare down a receiver making it much harder for defensive backs to read him. Garoppolo is not afraid to check down to the underneath receiver. Instead of forcing a throw, he is fine with checking it down for a five yard gain. Another aspect where Garoppolo excels is keeping his eyes down field when the blitz arrives. Instead of panicking and take a sack, he often finds an open receiver or simply throws it away.

Size:

Listed at 6-2, 226 lbs, Garoppolo has average height and weight for an NFL Quarterback. He has 9 inch hands and 30 inch arms which are typical for a Quarterback. Quarterbacks like Drew Brees and Russell Wilsonhave had tremendous success in the NFL and both are smaller than Garoppolo so his size should not negatively affect his draft stock.

Release:

Another area where Jimmy Garoppolo shines is his release. He might have the fastest release of any Quarterback in the draft. At his pro day, Garoppolo had a private workout with 49ers Head Coach Jim Harbaugh. Afterwards, Harbaugh was asked what he thought of Garoppolo's release: "Quick release, yes." This is a great trait to possess because by getting the ball out his hands quickly, Garoppolo will limit the amount of times he is sacked. In 2013, Garoppolo was only sacked 19 times. To compare, Johnny Manziel who is known for his evasiveness was also sacked 19 times.

Athleticism:

At the NFL Scouting Combine, Garoppolo ran a 4.97 40-yard dash which was one of the slowest times among Quarterbacks. While having an athletic Quarterback is a benefit because it allows Offensive Coordinators to call bootlegs and Quarterback keeps, it is not necessary. Garoppolo makes the majority of his throws from the pocket where elite athleticism is not needed.

Pocket Presence:

Quarterbacks that spend most of their time in the pocket must develop good pocket presence. As mentioned before, Garoppolo was sacked only 19 times last year. He navigates the pocket well and steps up when pressured from the outside. But what is important is that while Garoppolo avoids defenders, he keeps his eyes down field looking for open Wide Receivers. His shuffles his feet quickly like Peyton Manning does which allows him to scan the field faster.

Leadership:

Quarterbacks are often asked to provide leadership not just for the offense, but for the entire team. The Quarterbacks in the NFL that do not succeed often never step into that role. But for Jimmy Garoppolo, he has been Eastern Illinois's leader for 4 years. He is very composed on and off the field. When he does throw an occasional interception, he comes right back with a brilliant throw.

Pro Comparison:

Philip Rivers: While Garoppolo is often compared to Tony Romo, I see a lot of Philip Rivers in him. Both are extremely accurate, smart and are leaders. Both often lack velocity on their throws. Rivers is one of the best Quarterbacks in the NFL so if Garoppolo shares his traits, it means he has serious potential.



http://www.silverandblackpride.com/2014/5/2/5671322/jimmy-garoppolo-scouting-report





Good read, Dawg.

Makes one wonder how he lasted so long on draft day cause those comments reek of Top 5 pick.

Go get this dude, Sashi.


I feel the same. Very nice article!


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 220
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 220
System quarterback, not sold on him at all.


We are terrible
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,480
Roses are red,
Bring RG3 back,
I'm telling you right now,
Jimmy G will be whack.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 5,386
Originally Posted By: Swish
Roses are red,
Bring RG3 back,
I'm telling you right now,
Jimmy G will be whack.


I'm okay with Jimmy,
but not for a #1.
We're expecting Tom Brady,
getting Flynned won't be fun.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065
Originally Posted By: Goose7
System quarterback, not sold on him at all.


It's not like he came in week 17 into an offense that was humming along and just tossed 6 TDs like it was nothing.

People claim there isn't enough to go by to say he's good. By that standard you also can say there isn't enough to say he's bad. Or specifically say he's a "system QB"

And there's technically nothing wrong with a "system QB" anyways, assuming the system works, and he works well in it..


Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,656
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,656
I agree, ThatGuy. Many of the better QBs could be said to be "system QBs". A lot of the success they've had could be attributed to the system they run. I think it's an oversimplified term for many QBs.


There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do.
-Derek Jeter
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: Goose7
System quarterback, not sold on him at all.


Could you please expound on this?

System QB? Which type of system? The one he ran in college or the one in NE? And exactly what kind of "systems" are they?"

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,061
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,061
j/c:

3 POSSIBLE TRADE DESTINATIONS FOR PATRIOTS QB JIMMY GAROPPOLO



The Browns’ analytical approach can actually be pretty easily determined (besides what value they place on Garoppolo), because their current Director of Research and Strategy, Kevin Meers, wrote an article several years ago that took Jimmy Johnson’s famous draft trade value chart and made some much needed updates. He uses Pro Football Reference’s Career Approximate Values (CAV) to determine what each pick’s true value is, and while that’s not a perfect way to determine player value, it gives us insight as to how the Browns approach the draft and this potential trade.

Jimmy Garoppolo was the 62nd pick in the 2014 draft, and in this year’s draft, the Browns hold the first, 12th, 33rd, 50th, and 65th picks, while the Patriots have the 32nd, 64th, and 96th picks in the first three rounds (the Patriots potentially have a compensatory third-round pick acquired in the Jamie Collins trade). Initial reports/sources stated the Patriots wanted compensation similar to what the Eagles received in the Sam Bradford trade—a first and fourth-round pick. Considering the Browns have two first-round picks, they have the ammunition to make this happen, and also considering that the Patriots don’t have a fourth-round pick in the 2018 draft, the 12th overall pick and a fourth-round pick next year is in line with what New England wants.

However, I don’t see this scenario happening, as the Browns’ analytical approach covets draft picks, and if that fourth-round pick Cleveland trades is near the top of the round, that package is the equivalent of the fourth overall pick in the draft, based on the chart. Simply put, increasing the value of Garoppolo 58 spots in the draft based on six quarters of play is unlikely. A more likely scenario of the first- and fourth-round picks playing out is if the teams swap first-round picks, which places Garoppolo’s value at the No. 33 pick. Any conversation that starts with a straight first and fourth for Garoppolo won’t have legs when it comes to the Browns.

Another popular trade scenario is trading two second-round picks for Garoppolo. If the Browns trade both of their later second-round picks in 2017 (pick 50) and in 2018 (not set, but assume 50 again), that’s valuing Garoppolo as the 10th overall pick—another unlikely trade scenario. If the Patriots were to throw in their third-round pick (perhaps the compensatory pick they got in the Collins trade), that puts the value of Garoppolo as a late first-round pick, and closer to that No. 33 slot, like in the previous scenario.

Again, we have no idea how the Browns value Garoppolo, and a trade between the two teams will heavily rely on that, but expect the value of the Patriots’ backup to be closer to No. 33 than No. 12, and therefore a package deal that ends up with the Browns holding both their first-round picks and parting with some second-round picks in exchange for Garoppolo and another later-round pick.

Full Article: https://www.profootballfocus.com/pro-3-p...tm_campaign=nfl


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:
The point is we already have Garoppolo on the team. Kessler.


This comment sparked some debate on the board and semantics ruled much of the commentary.

I have my own take on that comparison.

I think that the differences between Jimmy G and Cody are immense. Here is why:

--Jimmy G gets rid of the ball quickly. Cody does not.

--One of my concerns w/Jimmy G in college was his propensity to force longer throws into tight windows. I worried that he might throw picks in the NFL because defenses are so much faster. Cody is the complete opposite. He refuses or can't throw the ball into tight windows, especially throws that are at least in the intermediate range.

--Jimmy G has a much quicker release than Cody.

--While Jimmy G does not have a Rodgers-type arm, he can make all the NFL throws. Cody can not.

--Jimmy G will challenge defenses while Cody like to check down early and often.

They aren't similar in the meaningful areas.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I'm wondering if swapping our 12th overall pick w/the New England's 32nd overall pick and also giving NE a mid-round pick, perhaps a fourth rounder, would be enough to get Jimmy G...

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
This ones going to be interesting ... the most intriguing story of the off season ... and we may not know the answer til the night of the draft ... ohhh boy ... the drama .. *L* ..

I didn't touch Cody vs Jimmy as their's no comp IMO .. Jimmy wins by so much its not even worth addressing ...

What's Jimmy worth ... my prediction is a top 3 pick ... the amount of teams needing a QB coupled with the quality of the QB's coming out and the QB's in FA .... If Chicago or SF decide Jimmy's their franchise QB then I don't see why they won't give up the # 2 or 3 pick for him ... even the Jets at 6 ...

Hopefully I'm wrong ... we'll know at some point between now and the draft ...

Its going to be interesting to watch the domino's fall this off season ... hopefully we make good use of all our domino's ... we have lots and lots and lots of valuable ones ...




Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,805
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I'm wondering if swapping our 12th overall pick w/the New England's 32nd overall pick and also giving NE a mid-round pick, perhaps a fourth rounder, would be enough to get Jimmy G...


Quite possibly. Man we could do some damage with 32 and 33.

That's pretty much TWO 1st rounders that drop. I'm talking Top 20 BPA guys. Happens every year.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
This is to both you and KWhip.

I'm not good at figuring out trade values. I sure as hell hope it isn't a top 3 pick, but I think it will be more than a second rounder like some are saying.

I just hope we get it done.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,468
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,468
I wouldn't mind giving up both second rounders.. # 33 and # 52. That way with our third and fourth round picks we might be able to move back up into the second round... I just hate to give up a high first round pick for any unproven QB. IMO 6 Qtrs does not prove a QB. Remember Matt Flynn...


The Cleveland Browns - WE KNOW QUARTERBACKS ( Look at how many we've had ... )
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13,358
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
I'm wondering if swapping our 12th overall pick w/the New England's 32nd overall pick and also giving NE a mid-round pick, perhaps a fourth rounder, would be enough to get Jimmy G...


People like to talk trash about the traditional value chart, but if you look at most of the trades that are not centered around pick #1 or pick #2 they are still pretty accurate.

The rumor I've heard the most involved #33 and Philly's #2 next year for Garroppolo. That's worth somewhere in the neighborhood of 800-1000 "points," depending on how you value future year picks.

The value of the 31 (600) and 32 picks (590) is roughly equivalent to the value of the 12th pick (1200). That's putting a value of Garroppolo at the #31 pick. If the Browns were to throw in a mid rounder, it would likely have to be the third rounder (#65 - 265 points). Their fourth round selection (#106 - 82 points) isn't worth a ton.

A scenario where a pick swap with #12 would make sense if that original trade I referenced were legit would be #12 (1200) for Jimmy G & #64 (270). We'd have #1, #33, #50, #64, and #65, as well as all our picks next year. You could probably rebuild the secondary on that:

1) Garrett, DE
33) Baker or Desmond King, FS
50) Cam Sutton, CB
64) Quincy Wilson (maybe -- projections all over the map) or Conley, CB
65) Ethan Pocic, C
106) Either trade up for Eddie Jackson or take Justin Evans

Personally, I think I'd rather keep #12 and swap out 33 and next year's Philly #2. JMO

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Thanks for the knowledge.

Again, I am pretty much clueless when it comes to predicting the value.

I was just wondering because I was thinking getting Jimmy G, Garrett, and then having the 32nd and 33rd picks, would be something I would be very happy with.

I was trying to be "fair" to both the Browns and the Pats, but again, I'm not sure if my scenario makes any sense in terms of "value" for either.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
One thing that I haven't seen mentioned is, When the Vik's gave up a 1st and a 4th for Bradford, it was for a pretty well known QB who has alot of history. JimmyG does not. Big difference. I'm surprised this hasn't been brought up. While I can see New England wanting the same thing as the Vik's, it's not anywhere near the same thing. I hope our FO takes this into account, I think they will.


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Now that the dust is settling and the leaks to up JG's value is behind us. I'm hearing a lot of 2nd round being the magic number for JG.

http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/texan...und-pick-021217

Our we over estimating his worth on this board?

I will be happy with what ever direction Hue makes on QB...JG, I'm there. Mitch at overall #1 I'm there. Watson at 12 or a drop back??? Possibly there at 33?

Don't know - I do expect 5-6 good players from the draft and a couple of key FA.

jmho


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,061
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,061
Quote:
I'm hearing a lot of 2nd round being the magic number for JG.


That does seem to be the prevailing thought as of late, and if true, I'm pretty pleased with it. I was expecting the market to get him would include #12 and I don't like giving up that much. I'm guessing the first and fourth Shefter spewed out was simply the starting point for negotiation, and hopefully writers are catching wind of the market sliding to a more reasonable level.

Personally, I expect a trade to happen pretty early on in FA, so somewhere shortly after March 9th. I don't think it will drag on closer to the draft.....too many potential suitors at this point.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
I don't understand why trading a player has to wait for March 9th? Why do we have to wait for the 2016 contract to run out???

Just doesn't make sense for me...I know that is what is stated in the NFL.


March 9 -- Trading period for 2017 begins at 4:00 p.m., New York time, after expiration of all 2016 contracts.


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,635
If selections in the second round is the price for JG, I'm all about it.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,061
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,061
Maybe the period to negotiate will be like FA, two days earlier on the 7th. The 9th is really just to formally announce and sign.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Page 3 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 9 10
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Garoppolo Part Four

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5