Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,119
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,119
What has to be done to be almost winless in two years. You almost have to work hard at it with a lot of help to be this bad. You also must have placed priority on the wrong stuff, either overvalued it or mis valued it, and then lack judgment about impact players.

This front off ice seems to know the price of everything and the value of nothing. It certainly fails to value much of the good.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,119
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,119
Look aye what we are sustaining right now. Apparently we wanted to go agonizingly slowly, torture the fans, and lose well above 90% of our games. Our play sucks. Just putrid.

Somehow it should matter to fans that we be told by him that he takes ownership for this garbage. Sashi, we already pinned it to you. Whether you claim it, own it, or giftwrap it and give it to your mama, it is on you. Get somebody else to do what you can't. For real NFL folks, it isn't tough to do; this is not for you.

Snappy interviews do not matter.


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
Originally Posted By: cfrs15

In the end, I agree with the front office's approach. While the last week was mistake riddled, I don't think people should be fired because of it.


It's not the approach that I have issues with, it's been the execution that has me raising an eyebrow.

After listening to Hue Jackson's press conference today, it seems the line between the FO and Coaching staff has been drawn in the sand. I did not come away feeling there was a united front, at least from the coaching staff's perspective.

The next 8 weeks will be trying.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Milk Man
Originally Posted By: cfrs15

In the end, I agree with the front office's approach. While the last week was mistake riddled, I don't think people should be fired because of it.


I can agree. It's not the approach that I have issues with, it's been the execution that has me raising an eyebrow.

After listening to Hue Jackson's press conference today, it seems the line between the FO and Coaching staff has been drawn in the sand. I did not come away feeling there was a united front, at least from the coaching staff's perspective.

The next 8 weeks will be trying.


I would also like to say that I think that at least one of the two groups (front office/coaching staff) will be fired. I don't trust the Haslams at all.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: Milk Man
Originally Posted By: cfrs15

In the end, I agree with the front office's approach. While the last week was mistake riddled, I don't think people should be fired because of it.


It's not the approach that I have issues with, it's been the execution that has me raising an eyebrow.

After listening to Hue Jackson's press conference today, it seems the line between the FO and Coaching staff has been drawn in the sand. I did not come away feeling there was a united front, at least from the coaching staff's perspective.

The next 8 weeks will be trying.


If Sashi and company were not fired after what transpired last week and the rift w/the coaching staff........then that almost certainly means that Jimmy will stick w/a guy who never had the proper qualifications for the job in the first place and I fully expect for Hue Jackson and some other coaches to be sacrificed at the end of the season.

That is the same prediction I had when they announced the damn plan and again this off-season.

I swear.........our owners almost always make the worst choices and listen to the wrong faction of the fan base.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
I believe they both (FO & Coaching staff) get canned at the end of the year.

By that I mean, Sashi and Hue, any new regime will decide the fate of the underlings.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
What makes you think that Sashi will get canned? Not being snarky at all. Just curious...

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,127
S
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
S
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,127
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie


Tear down and rebuilds can't be done in 18 months.



True, but winning more than 1 game in 18 months should be perfectly feasible.


It's supposed to be hard! If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,127
S
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
S
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,127
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: mac

People are wrong to try to hang this on the HC and coaching staff


After thinking about it a little more (I definitely overreacted during the horrible last week), I think they are wrong to hang it on anyone. The plan was to be bad. It was always going to be hard.

We need to see the plan through for a change. That means keeping everyone.


He had a plan to make us bad, problem is, he doesn't have a plan to win. Sticking with Sashi means accepting 0 - 1 win seasons as long as he is in charge.


It's supposed to be hard! If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: Squires
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie


Tear down and rebuilds can't be done in 18 months.



True, but winning more than 1 game in 18 months should be perfectly feasible.


My problem isn't w/the record. I knew it would be bad and tried to tell everyone that so much losing would lead to conflicts and the blame game.

That is the problem. People are blaming the other side [on both sides] and that is not a recipe for success.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: Squires
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: mac

People are wrong to try to hang this on the HC and coaching staff


After thinking about it a little more (I definitely overreacted during the horrible last week), I think they are wrong to hang it on anyone. The plan was to be bad. It was always going to be hard.

We need to see the plan through for a change. That means keeping everyone.


He had a plan to make us bad, problem is, he doesn't have a plan to win. Sticking with Sashi means accepting 0 - 1 win seasons as long as he is in charge.


Come on. You sound just as bad as those who excuse the FO all of the time and blame Hue for our problems.

Sashi wants to win. He believes in his plan. No one has a plan to be "bad."

Play fair.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,127
S
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
S
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,127
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog


Sashi wants to win. He believes in his plan. No one has a plan to be "bad."



1-23 says otherwise.


It's supposed to be hard! If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: Squires
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog


Sashi wants to win. He believes in his plan. No one has a plan to be "bad."



1-23 says otherwise.


Again, I don't think you are being fair. You are acting like guys like Memphis, WSU, Devil, 32, cfrs, etc who constantly put all the blame on Hue and give the FO a pass.

Sashi and the other guys who made the plan said that they fully expected to lose a ton of games in the first two years, but they thought that the plan would ensure long-term success.

I think it is unfair to act like they want to lose. In fact, I think that is a preposterous notion. I don't agree w/the plan, but I get the concept. Lose now in order to win later. And they knew the plan would take time.

I just wish people would play fair and be objective.

I was suspended for the last few days [and I fully deserved that suspension because I was acting like an idiot] and I read the board w/out commenting and realized just how biased so many posters are.

Being objective trumps subjective opinions every day of the week and this board would be a much better place if we eliminated some of that subjective crap.

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 878
H
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
H
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 878
To be objective, someone must have all the facts. Unfortunately, not a one of us has the whole truth. So, subjectivity is the default mode.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
What makes you think that Sashi will get canned? Not being snarky at all. Just curious...


When Wentz hoists the NFL MVP and Lombardi trophies, Haslam will want his pound of flesh.

More to your question, I just don't see anyone surviving this, they can all play nice for the camera during the pressers, but this feels like when things went south with Farmer and Pettine all over again, sans text to the sideline. Or the unfathomable amount of other times we have had the chance to watch regime demises since 1999. The lines in the sand appear to be drawn.

We can only imagine all the stuff we are unaware of that has gone down behind the scenes.

I don't think Sashi will be able to continue to sell his vision of collecting draft picks as enough reason to retain him. Haslam sees Wentz, he sees Watson, he sees Dak, he wonders why they couldn't land Garoppolo. There is no concrete evidence to even remotely suggest this thing gets turned around in 2018. The year Haslam stated we can expect to see significant improvement.

As an added bonus, Haslam will see a continued drop in season ticket corporate sales. I don't mean the season ticket holder up in the 500 sections giving up their two seats at $1200. I'm talking about the corporations that season tickets include access to the Draft Room Club and Kardiac Club. Corps that have 4 - 8 seats to entertain clients and cost $20k -$25k per season. This only adds to the pressure already suffocating this organization.

I just think Haslam gets out the powder keg unless something in the second half of the season drastically changes and I don't see that happening at all.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Not sure if you are right or wrong, but I appreciate your answer. Thanks.

It's more for me to consider.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,845
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,845
Vers and others,
I know that we are all frustrated with the Browns. But we are all missing the key element. When Sashi/Depodesta sold the Haslams on their idea of a rebuild, it was based on a baseball model...

Think about it, baseball FO will pick/keep a bunch of young talent for years before they start winning. Think about the Astros, most of their talent has been in the system since 2014, they started winning late last year and now! Sashi/Depodesta are trying to build a team based on that model.

Now of course, Hue and coaches are not used to that!! They are trying to win NOW, pick up my needs NOW and we can start winning with Free Agents and certain pickups NOW!!.. But that is not the baseball model!!!. And that came to a head last week.

I hate to say this but no one is getting fired. Hue/Coaches are not getting fired because Haslam was about to sign off on getting Hue a QB for right now!.. Sashi/Depodesta are not getting fired either, but they better pull off alot of stuff in this off season.

Think about it!!

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,670
Wait, we're like the Astros? I hope McCarron wasn't our Verlander! tongue

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
You made a comment about the baseball model.

I don't know if that is true or not, but I want to comment on the difference between the baseball model and the NFL model.

Let's say you need a RF in baseball. You draft 4 or more of them. You assign them to different levels in the minor leagues. You don't expect all to develop, but you just hope one develops.

Now, let's say you have need at WR. You draft 4 of them. What do you do w/them if they all don't appear ready. Put 1 on the PS? Keep all four and hope they develop? There isn't a minor league system w/multiple levels.

Thus, I think it's a dumb ass strategy in the NFL and you can't use a baseball strategy in this case because the two professional leagues are so different.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,845
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,845
I know.. McCarron was just a unproven pitcher that you HOPE can give you a few innings!!..LMAO

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,845
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,845
Vers,
I agree, the baseball model can't work in the NFL because you do not have that time nor development league..aka the minors to groom your talent. Plus, the NFL season is too short to actually get your young talent time to learn on the job!

But that is what they sold the Haslams on. Think, anyone else would not do a rebuild like the Browns have. Lose ALL your veteran talent, keep ALL your draft picks(2016), put a young team out there for 2 or 3 seasons. That is a baseball model. And those are the things that Cleveland Media should be questioning Sashi/Depodesta on!!!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,448
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,448
Joke ! But not funny in the least .

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Squires
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: mac

People are wrong to try to hang this on the HC and coaching staff


After thinking about it a little more (I definitely overreacted during the horrible last week), I think they are wrong to hang it on anyone. The plan was to be bad. It was always going to be hard.

We need to see the plan through for a change. That means keeping everyone.


He had a plan to make us bad, problem is, he doesn't have a plan to win. Sticking with Sashi means accepting 0 - 1 win seasons as long as he is in charge.


We don't know if he has a plan to win because we haven't gotten to that point in the process yet.

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,847
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23,847
Originally Posted By: DogNDC
Vers,
I agree, the baseball model can't work in the NFL because you do not have that time nor development league..aka the minors to groom your talent. Plus, the NFL season is too short to actually get your young talent time to learn on the job!

But that is what they sold the Haslams on. Think, anyone else would not do a rebuild like the Browns have. Lose ALL your veteran talent, keep ALL your draft picks(2016), put a young team out there for 2 or 3 seasons. That is a baseball model. And those are the things that Cleveland Media should be questioning Sashi/Depodesta on!!!


not to mention baseball is more about individual effort and players basically being on islands.. They either can play their position or not, noone else can help them do their job better, where as the NFL..its more about working as a team and trusting each other that allows you to be good individually. Alot less room for error in football than baseball. So the metrics are completely different and I think we are wasting time with this experiment


Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. -John Wayne
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,127
S
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
S
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,127
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Squires
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: mac

People are wrong to try to hang this on the HC and coaching staff


After thinking about it a little more (I definitely overreacted during the horrible last week), I think they are wrong to hang it on anyone. The plan was to be bad. It was always going to be hard.

We need to see the plan through for a change. That means keeping everyone.


He had a plan to make us bad, problem is, he doesn't have a plan to win. Sticking with Sashi means accepting 0 - 1 win seasons as long as he is in charge.


We don't know if he has a plan to win because we haven't gotten to that point in the process yet.


1-23. Pretty clear he doesn't. I guess he gets a free pass for another 5 years so we can find out, right? He needs to start showing results from this mess. He needs to start caring about winning.


It's supposed to be hard! If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Originally Posted By: Squires
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: Squires
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Originally Posted By: mac

People are wrong to try to hang this on the HC and coaching staff


After thinking about it a little more (I definitely overreacted during the horrible last week), I think they are wrong to hang it on anyone. The plan was to be bad. It was always going to be hard.

We need to see the plan through for a change. That means keeping everyone.


He had a plan to make us bad, problem is, he doesn't have a plan to win. Sticking with Sashi means accepting 0 - 1 win seasons as long as he is in charge.


We don't know if he has a plan to win because we haven't gotten to that point in the process yet.


1-23. Pretty clear he doesn't. I guess he gets a free pass for another 5 years so we can find out, right? He needs to start showing results from this mess. He needs to start caring about winning.


1-23 because the entire plan was to bad the first couple years. Do you think we are playing the youngest team in the league because the front office thinks it will make us better this year?

Like I said before, our owner promoted Sashi Brown with this plan in mind. We have to trust that their is another step after the tanking.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,418
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,418
Quote:
Like I said before, our owner promoted Sashi Brown with this plan in mind. We have to trust that their is another step after the tanking.


thumbsup


I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,178
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,178
Originally Posted By: GMdawg
Quote:
Like I said before, our owner promoted Sashi Brown with this plan in mind. We have to trust that their is another step after the tanking.


thumbsup


And unless Haslem didn't tell Hue the plan, Hue knew what he was getting into. If Haslem didn't then shame on him.

Bear down. Stay the course. If the rift between Hue and FO is too much to mend, then maybe decisions need to be made. But if not, stick to the plan, continue to add young talent, and find the QB.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,066
First let me say the last few posts have been pretty good... objective questions and criticisms of "the plan". I can appreciate that.

I actually think there's a good chance that neither the FO or the coaches get canned at the end of the season, though we may see some coaches decide to move on to greener pastures.

Going forward I HOPE the lessons learned are as follows:

Hue really should consider an OC. Not because I think his play calling is crap, but it's become abundantly clear just how much time he wants to and is going to have to dedicate to whomever his QB is. I do like that it appears he was willing in the last game to start to tailor the game plan to the QB.

Sashi and Co. have to get better at evaluating (he even admitted so in the presser I believe)... but they also have to start realizing you can find players that can help you win now, and still be players you can invest long term in.

As far as bringing in a football guy goes? Having a FO and HC with equal say, neither answerable to each other but to the owner directly... while it sounds great and kumbaya on paper.. it's exactly how we get what happened last week.

My gut feeling is that if you gave Hue control of the roster, he'd end up over his head. But I DO believe what Sashi and DePo are doing has legit value.

I guess, to me if we brought in a "football guy" I would possibly have Hue and Sashi operate as they do now, but instead of answering directly to Jimmy, answer to the football guy. But he has to also have an understanding and appreciation for what the FO brings as well. Someone that will be willing to say to Hue, "I understand you want X guy, but not at the expense of the future" and to also say to Sashi "I know the numbers say this guy, but this is one of those moments where we have to trust Hue's instincts".

Sort of like an Obi Wan Kenobi for the Browns... he keeps Luke from the dangers of short cuts that lead to the Dark Side, but is also the guy to tell Luke to trust and use the Force during his trench run to blow up the Deathstar.


"Hey, I'm a reasonable guy. But I've just experienced some very unreasonable things."
-Jack Burton

-It looks like the Harvard Boys know what they are doing after all.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,297
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,297
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
Originally Posted By: Squires
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog


Sashi wants to win. He believes in his plan. No one has a plan to be "bad."



1-23 says otherwise.


Again, I don't think you are being fair. You are acting like guys like Memphis, WSU, Devil, 32, cfrs, etc who constantly put all the blame on Hue and give the FO a pass.

Sashi and the other guys who made the plan said that they fully expected to lose a ton of games in the first two years, but they thought that the plan would ensure long-term success.

I think it is unfair to act like they want to lose. In fact, I think that is a preposterous notion. I don't agree w/the plan, but I get the concept. Lose now in order to win later. And they knew the plan would take time.

I just wish people would play fair and be objective.

I was suspended for the last few days [and I fully deserved that suspension because I was acting like an idiot] and I read the board w/out commenting and realized just how biased so many posters are.

Being objective trumps subjective opinions every day of the week and this board would be a much better place if we eliminated some of that subjective crap.


You have GOT to be kidding.

So YOU got suspended again shocked this time for being an idiot (your words, not mine) but the rest of us post unfairly and lack objectivity. Riiiiight. I've been on this board for over 15 years and I have never been suspended...I've never even received a warning.

You have me on ignore but you "know" what I post and what I think...yet others load up the board with subjectivity. How objective can you possibly be if you conclude you "know" what other people think when you have those same people on ignore?

You've recently stated that Hue will get fired because Jimmy will listen to the "wrong" faction of Browns fans. What could be more subjective than that?

Stand in front of a mirror and read your posts before hitting the "Submit" button. The hypocrisy will seep out of the mirror.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,178
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 19,178
Quote:
Again, I don't think you are being fair. You are acting like guys like Memphis, WSU, Devil, 32, cfrs, etc who constantly put all the blame on Hue and give the FO a pass.


Riiiiight. More agenda posting and fake news from Versatile Dog.

I think I said just yesterday both are at fault for things and I'm probably one of a few people that isn't calling for Hue or the FO to be fired. But please, keep the agenda going. I'll warm up some more popcorn.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,671
M
Legend
Online
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 13,671
Just out of curiosity - and with a lot of luck and healthy MG, Coleman and the reemergence of Josh Gordon:

Let's say that Haslam keeps the team in tact till the end of the season and the Browns go on to beat Ravens, Bears and (Packers or the Chargers) ... finish this year 3-16 with a rookie QB who has thrown away at least 2 games with his rookie mistakes.

Does that change anything? I keep seeing "1-23" . and it just made me wonder if winning 3 of 8 would change some opinions of those wanting to fire FO and Hue. . . .

I know I want to keep both for another year .... would I feel differently if at the end of the season we are 0-16 ? . . . I guess I might but there are some other factors to review before knowing for sure.


The more things change the more they stay the same.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Right.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864
I most definitely think winning 3 of our last 8 would change the entire feel around this team. From the players to the fans to Haslam.

One win is mandatory. If we go 0-16 I can't see Haslam not firing somebody. I don't think another 1 win season does much for the team culture

2 wins is a start but I am not sure that is enough. I guess it depends on the wins. 2 of the last 3? Perhaps that leaves a good taste in our mouths to end the season. Baltimore and Pittsburgh? Then definitely. Even if Pittsburgh is resting the majority of their starters.


Am I perfect? No
Am I trying to be a better person?
Also no
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,297
W
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
W
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,297
Originally Posted By: mgh888
Just out of curiosity - and with a lot of luck and healthy MG, Coleman and the reemergence of Josh Gordon:

Let's say that Haslam keeps the team in tact till the end of the season and the Browns go on to beat Ravens, Bears and (Packers or the Chargers) ... finish this year 3-16 with a rookie QB who has thrown away at least 2 games with his rookie mistakes.

Does that change anything? I keep seeing "1-23" . and it just made me wonder if winning 3 of 8 would change some opinions of those wanting to fire FO and Hue. . . .

I know I want to keep both for another year .... would I feel differently if at the end of the season we are 0-16 ? . . . I guess I might but there are some other factors to review before knowing for sure.


Excellent point. I'm looking less at W's and more at definable progress and competitiveness throughout the game and at all levels. W's are always nice...but they can be misleading if the progress is lacking. Almost stat-like if you will.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,829
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,829
Haven't we lost 4 games by 3 points?


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted By: mgh888
Just out of curiosity - and with a lot of luck and healthy MG, Coleman and the reemergence of Josh Gordon:

Let's say that Haslam keeps the team in tact till the end of the season and the Browns go on to beat Ravens, Bears and (Packers or the Chargers) ... finish this year 3-16 with a rookie QB who has thrown away at least 2 games with his rookie mistakes.

Does that change anything? I keep seeing "1-23" . and it just made me wonder if winning 3 of 8 would change some opinions of those wanting to fire FO and Hue. . . .

I know I want to keep both for another year .... would I feel differently if at the end of the season we are 0-16 ? . . . I guess I might but there are some other factors to review before knowing for sure.


First I think Colemon will only be average at best, and Gordon is a cancer in any team...

Winning some games, will sure help,but its not only winning, is stopping with the stupid mistakes, and showing signs that we are learning.

If players rally around Hue, and get some wins,then hey will show us that they support and believe in him.If they throw the towel, than that shows what kind of support Hue has.

Regarding Sachi, well if Colemon, MG, Peppers and Njoku show a remarkable increase, then he will validate his trade downn strategy.

If they continue to be average or on IR, I guess that seals Sachi's faith, since he will confirm that he cannot identify the elite players on the league.

Drafting and signing good players,anyone can do it.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
- exec Sashi Brown on passing on Wentz, Watson: "Don't think trading down was the problem, it's purely evaluating" saywhat


Then says......

- Sashi Brown said the front office does have football people: "This group can evaluate (talent)."


I think you are taking this too literally on his statements.

What he is saying is the decision was not due to trading down and acquiring picks. The decision was due to their talent evaluation (regarding Wentz, Watson).

Then he is stating overall they got football people who can evaluate talent!

Thats all everyone here is looking for that AHA moment I feel like I'm watching CNN and we are evaluating a Trump presser.

rofl


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,829
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,829
And some simply ignore the aha moments when they happen.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,307
Originally Posted By: eotab
- exec Sashi Brown on passing on Wentz, Watson: "Don't think trading down was the problem, it's purely evaluating" saywhat


Then says......

- Sashi Brown said the front office does have football people: "This group can evaluate (talent)."


I think you are taking this too literally on his statements.

What he is saying is the decision was not due to trading down and acquiring picks. The decision was due to their talent evaluation (regarding Wentz, Watson).

Then he is stating overall they got football people who can evaluate talent!

Thats all everyone here is looking for that AHA moment I feel like I'm watching CNN and we are evaluating a Trump presser.

rofl


+1

I think he was beating himself....

We have a plan to develop the team and infuse it with with talent, yet we cannot evaluate players like Watson,Bosa, Hooker, Zeke and Wentz, just to name a few...

Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Sashi at 1:15 11/6

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5