DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Roy Moore accused of sexual encounter with 14-year-old girl when he was 32

I think you all lost the right to use the whole "triggered snowflake" thing when you rallied behind a man-child who spends all day crying about how no one is fair to him.

Alabama governor plans to vote for Moore even though ‘I have no reason to disbelieve’ accusers.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/360...or-moore-anyway

In other words, "I'll vote Republican even if I believe he's a pedophile."

Murica!

ahhh, the party of family values.

Ahhh those who live in glass houses crying about their broken windows.

i don't live in a glass house. i live in a well built house with no pedophiles in it.

Well when you claim to be the party of family values, the moral majority and the Christian right, you kind of set yourself up for this. Maybe if ya'll would quit lying about how much "better you are" you wouldn't get so much heat for things like this.

Only until some nit wit makes an accusation. Then it is bring out the hangman, a finger was pointed!

you saw what the governor said, correct?

she essentially admitted that the accusers were right, but she's gonna vote for Moore anyway.

that goes way beyond accusation.

Well that is on her then.

Has nothing to do with how I will vote.

you live in Alabama now?

you must be the voting Fraud trump was talking about.

That's not true, at all.

She said she has no reason to disbelieve the claims. That is far from what you are implying.

she doesn't disbelieve the claims, yes. if she has no reason not to believe the claims, doesn't that imply she believes the women?

yall conservatives are experts at spinning absolutely everything. yall have taken word play to a whole new level.

Depends on what you mean by "is".

Not at all, could mean she has not seen enough evidence. Could mean she has not seen anything to disprove them YET. Could mean a number of things, but you asserted a FACT by a comment that was not so. I don't know what she meant by that, you could be correct. but you could be wrong. It seems like the one word playing is you, as you are ASSUMING what she meant.

when a politician says "i don't disbelieve the claims", how else am i supposed to take that other than a massive spin job?

if casey anthony was running for senate, would you vote for her? ya know, not enough evidence.

Well for one, that's a urine soaked analogy. In one instance, evidence was presented and I would be able to make a judgment on my own. In the other, you have accusations, albeit strong ones, accusations.

However the fact remains, you bash people on here all the time for making blanket statements, yet you made an assumption on what she meant, without knowing what she knows, without knowing what she has heard, and without knowing the proper context or tone. You are incorrect in asserting it is a fact what you said - when she did not say that. You parsed her words, played her words, then you tried to blame others for parsing/playing words. That is very definition of being hypocritical.

yep, another talibangelical. i'm moving on.

Please do. You complete ignore the fact you are wrong on the topic of what she said, and now you cant backtrack it so you are trying to change the subject. Facts are, im an atheist. So there you go again, putting things to paper that are untrue. Do you care to continue with nonsense - or are you done for the day??

The judge so far, looks like he did some sick stuff, and if so he needs to be shot.

But that doesn't change the fact you parsed the Gov words to fit your agenda. Again, hypocritical statements are flying from you today. Now, if you would like to share your mind reading expertise and let us know what she really meant and what she fees with your special powers, please continue.

fixed it for ya-

We’ve shared the facts already. You’re trying to cover for someone supporting a pedo.

Sure thing. I said I think he did something. But yet you will not admit that what you stated was not what the Gov said, and you are attempting to be a mind reader while in asserting YOUR OPINION as fact. Sad, really really sad.

Trump will be happy to know he can save money by eliminating all the Judges now that we have Swish's Finger to point out guilt and innocence!

Anytime I read or hear politicians use double negatives, it is incredibly fishy to me.





The reason it's fishy to me is because Kay was a high school teacher and graduated from Auburn. I'm sure she can articulate well. These double negatives are carefully crafted wordplay to keep constituents in check when the special election is held.