Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
j/c:

This thread has become even too weird for me and that is saying something.

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Too weird for you AND YOUR LITTLE DOG TOO! willynilly

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
j/c:

Quote:
Jim Thome does not want Chief Wahoo on the cap of his Hall of Fame plaque
Craig Calcaterra,NBC Sports 18 hours ago



There was little question that Jim Thome was going to wear a Cleveland Indians cap on his Hall of Fame plaque. He said today, however, that he does not want the Indians cap he wore for the vast majority of his time in Cleveland to be depicted. Specifically, he does not want Chief Wahoo on his cap. He wants the block-C:

“I know my decision would be to wear the ‘C’ because I think it’s the right thing to do,” Thome said. “I think I need to have a conversation with the Hall of Fame because of all the history and everything involved. I just think that’s the right thing to do.”

Hall of Fame inductees are allowed to voice their preference of the cap for their plaque, but the Hall of Fame gets final say on the matter in order to maintain a semblance of historical accuracy. In the past, that role has been exclusively dedicated to policing the choice of which team’s cap a player who played on multiple teams was wearing in order not to show him wearing a cap of a team for which he only briefly played. I am not aware of an instance in which a player chose to wear an uncommon cap design for a team which, otherwise, would be acceptable on the plaque.

For what it’s worth, the Indians wore Chief Wahoo caps for most of Thome’s career. From 1991 through 2002, Wahoo was the primary cap for Thome’s Indians, with an “Script-I” cap serving as an occasional alternate. In his second, brief stint with the Indians in 2011, the club did wear a block-C alternate cap.

If that was all that had happened, the Hall could very well tell Thome, sorry, but Wahoo it is. Obviously, however, the situation has changed, with Major League Baseball and the Indians announcing that Wahoo would be discontinued following the 2018 season, primarily because the logo — which is clearly a racist depiction of a cartoonish Native American — is in poor taste. In light of that, it would not be surprising to see the hall grant Thome’s wish to put the block-C on his plaque.

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/jim-thome-does-not-want-213324315.html


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Originally Posted By: DCDAWGFAN
Quote:
Then perhaps some should know the reason the Cleveland Indians have thier name and who chief wahoo is.

Nobody in this thread (at least yet) is debating the name or the use of the phrase Chief Wahoo.. it's the caricature of the deformed red Indian face that people have a problem with.

Many of the social justice types want the name 'Indians' gone as well. The idea is to get Wahoo removed first, and go for the name later.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Originally Posted By: Haus
Originally Posted By: DCDAWGFAN
Quote:
Then perhaps some should know the reason the Cleveland Indians have thier name and who chief wahoo is.

Nobody in this thread (at least yet) is debating the name or the use of the phrase Chief Wahoo.. it's the caricature of the deformed red Indian face that people have a problem with.

Many of the social justice types want the name 'Indians' gone as well. The idea is to get Wahoo removed first, and go for the name later.

Just for humor, any of the staunchly anti-Wahoo posters want to go on record with their thoughts about the team's name as well?

I'm going to pick on Rocket here. Rocket, is the name 'Cleveland Indians' acceptable in your opinion?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,471
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,471
You have noticed how the posters have deflected and not addressed your work ???

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,133
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,133
Originally Posted By: waterdawg
You have noticed how the posters have deflected and not addressed your work ???


Everybody has their thing. My thing is I hate political correctness. Period. I view it as social bullying that leads to a very bland and colorless world. I have always prefered people speak their minds and to hell with who it offends. I prefer honest words with honest intentions not people trying to veil the meaning of their insults and intentions.

People might not like me or even hate me but can anyone on this board say that I hide behind words or that they don't know exactly what I mean when I say what I say? I am a brutally honest person. A person always knows where they stand with me.


You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 78,277
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 78,277
I've mentioned a couple of times in this thread that the next thing you know there will be protests trying to get the name changed to The Cleveland Native Americans but I think people thought I was joking. I wasn't.

Then I brought up the question as to what percentage of a group had to feel offended before such type of complaints should be acted on?

I really don't have an issue with the Tribe phasing out Chief Wahoo. I'm not a baseball fan. I am however concerned that going forward every time even a small percentage of any group feels offended, that there will be pressure for change.

At some point it will simply go too far. This is a bigger issue than Chief Wahoo in the grand scheme of things but I doubt people will actually see it until it's too late.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Originally Posted By: PitDAWG
I've mentioned a couple of times in this thread that the next thing you know there will be protests trying to get the name changed to The Cleveland Native Americans but I think people thought I was joking. I wasn't.

Then I brought up the question as to what percentage of a group had to feel offended before such type of complaints should be acted on?

I really don't have an issue with the Tribe phasing out Chief Wahoo. I'm not a baseball fan. I am however concerned that going forward every time even a small percentage of any group feels offended, that there will be pressure for change.

At some point it will simply go too far. This is a bigger issue than Chief Wahoo in the grand scheme of things but I doubt people will actually see it until it's too late.

I don't think you were joking, nor was I above.

About Chief Wahoo-- this is not something I'm going to make a big deal about as it's just not something that I find important enough to argue about. I get what you're saying about how far things will go (indeed, you've probably read similar arguments from me in the Political section, about different topics) but at the end of the day: It's just sports. Even in that context, the name means more to me than the logo does, and I also think there is no reasonable basis to go after the 'Indians' name whereas Chief Wahoo is a little bit goofy. Obviously, people interpret that 'goofiness' differently.

I draw the line at the team's name. I will be very disappointed if the MLB and fans ever allow the team to be bullied off of that.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Quote:

Just for humor, any of the staunchly anti-Wahoo posters want to go on record with their thoughts about the team's name as well?


I didn't like the Chief Wahoo name and spoke up about it numerous times.

I do not want to see the name "Indians" changed. I don't think there is anything offensive about it. In fact, I wish that we would come up w/a logo that actually honors the name.

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433
R
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
R
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,433

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
I think it'll happen the day Indians, Pakis, Hispanics and other brown people get together and change the name of the Cleveland Browns.

I don't really think it depends on the numbers at all. I think what's more ridiculous is that you think that they'll complain about such a thing. It's so dishonest and sad. Most of these communities have real problems that they're facing. Sports is such a trivial subject for them. There's a big difference between a harmless name and an Indian sambo. It's why no one is saying the Redskins should change their logo.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
This might suffice.

Sacred Rain Arrow



THE SACRED RAIN ARROW STATUE AND THE STORY BEHIND THE SCULPTURE.

I snapped this photo yesterday at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian @ DC. The bronze statue “Sacred Rain Arrow” was created by sculptor Allan Houser, who was inspired by a story told to him as a child by a Chiricahua Apache elder. During an unforgiving drought, a young Apache warrior was chosen by his people to make the journey to a medicine man. The man performed his rituals and blessed the young warrior’s bow and arrows. The young Apache knelt down, raised his bow toward the sky, and shot the sacred arrow containing his people’s prayer for rain high into the Spirit World.




#GMSTRONG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
That's really cool. I never saw that sculpture before.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
I think it'll happen the day Indians, Pakis, Hispanics and other brown people get together and change the name of the Cleveland Browns.

I don't really think it depends on the numbers at all. I think what's more ridiculous is that you think that they'll complain about such a thing. It's so dishonest and sad. Most of these communities have real problems that they're facing. Sports is such a trivial subject for them. There's a big difference between a harmless name and an Indian sambo. It's why no one is saying the Redskins should change their logo.


There was one Native American guy on here who said he despised the name "Redskins," but loved their logo.

I think the logo is cool, but the name isn't.

I am not saying I have the answers, but I think it comes down to common decency when we are deciding what to call and how to represent entire groups of people.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
I don't really think it depends on the numbers at all. I think what's more ridiculous is that you think that they'll complain about such a thing. It's so dishonest and sad.


If it's so ridiculous, then why are there a bunch of articles about it?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ml...mes/1075610001/

https://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2018/1/31/16946136/cleveland-indians-team-name-change-chief-wahoo

And the numbers do sort of matter. That's what he's getting at. As the links show, they're going to have plenty of people trying to speak on their behalf and tell us that it's offensive. Even if most of them don't actually find it so.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
I think common decency is the answer to a lot of these communication issues.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I don't feel like reading those. I want to know what is offensive about names like Seminoles, Braves, Blackhawks, etc? While I understand that the name "Indians" isn't really correct, I still don't see how it is offensive.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
People these days can find anything offensive.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Yeah. Well, screw them. LOL

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: ExclDawg
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
I don't really think it depends on the numbers at all. I think what's more ridiculous is that you think that they'll complain about such a thing. It's so dishonest and sad.


If it's so ridiculous, then why are there a bunch of articles about it?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ml...mes/1075610001/

https://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2018/1/31/16946136/cleveland-indians-team-name-change-chief-wahoo


Because publications are for profit ventures and need to churn out new content daily to make money. And if the internet taught us anything it's that opinions are like buttholes, everyone has them. Don't get me wrong, they do make some points, especially when it comes to the retconned history. However, I've never seen a tribe petition the Tribe over the name when they had many chances to do so.
Quote:

And the numbers do sort of matter. That's what he's getting at. As the links show, they're going to have plenty of people trying to speak on their behalf and tell us that it's offensive. Even if most of them don't actually find it so.


The numbers do matter, but so does context. Baseball is a dying sport, millennials and gen Z are not watching the sport at all. So the MLB needs to appeal to a new generation of morals. Most of their current fan base would prefer to keep it, which is why they're officially phasing it out over a year instead of doing it overnight.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
You and TTT were talking about Chief Wahoo freaked you out when you were kids, but what about this dude?



Now, he is freaky! Look at his feet, toe, eyes, eyebrows, ears, hair. The little dude is possessed. Kinda like an early "Chucky."

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,283
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,283
That statue reminds me of the Saltine Warrior statue at Syracuse. The Saltine Warrior was also used as a mascot for Syracuse until it was found to be offensive and removed as the team mascot.

For more than 40 years, a Lambda Chi Alpha member served as the Saltine Warrior. The tradition came about because a Lambda Chi’s father owned a cheerleading camp and made a costume for his son to wear.

Onkwehonwenha, a Native American student organization protested the use of the Saltine Warrior as a mascot in the late 1970s. Their voices were heard and the Indian was sidelined at the end of February 1978


Link


Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
You're tripping, the one with the crown is the best Cleveland logo.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
You and TTT were talking about Chief Wahoo freaked you out when you were kids, but what about this dude?



Now, he is freaky! Look at his feet, toe, eyes, eyebrows, ears, hair. The little dude is possessed. Kinda like an early "Chucky."


Johnny Manziel find this offensive to his people.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
No don't drag the Brownie. Y'all always joking about curses but don't consider that he's the fairy that has been warding off the curse. I ain't see him since 99 and we've sucked. That's a pretty strong correlation.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
No don't drag the Brownie. Y'all always joking about curses but don't consider that he's the fairy that has been warding off the curse. I ain't see him since 99 and we've sucked. That's a pretty strong correlation.


He was brought back in 2013 ... He hasn't helped much.


Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: ExclDawg
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
No don't drag the Brownie. Y'all always joking about curses but don't consider that he's the fairy that has been warding off the curse. I ain't see him since 99 and we've sucked. That's a pretty strong correlation.


He was brought back in 2013 ... He hasn't helped much.


Gotta use him as the logo, not the mascot. How we can expect him to fight in the ethereal realm when he has a physical manifestation? Bad planning, but 2013 was such a what if year. 2002, 2007, 2013 and 2015 have been the only seasons that I had any real hope.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,283
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 16,283
Yep, things haven't worked out for the elf from a mascot standpoint.


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Put that elf back on the shelf.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
C
~
Legend
Offline
~
Legend
C
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
Originally Posted By: Milk Man
Yep, things haven't worked out for the elf from a mascot standpoint.



Took me like 5 mins to realize that isn't Brandon Weeden.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
I think that Brownie the Elf was possessed by evil spirits and he is the one who put voices in the heads of those who wanted to move the Browns and he has also put a curse. on the team when we came back.

He's a very, very evil elf.

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,445
Originally Posted By: CHSDawg
I think it'll happen the day Indians, Pakis, Hispanics and other brown people get together and change the name of the Cleveland Browns.

I don't really think it depends on the numbers at all. I think what's more ridiculous is that you think that they'll complain about such a thing. It's so dishonest and sad. Most of these communities have real problems that they're facing. Sports is such a trivial subject for them. There's a big difference between a harmless name and an Indian sambo. It's why no one is saying the Redskins should change their logo.

It seems like you are trivializing Pit's argument. The fact is that there has been discussion about the 'Indians' name in the background of the Chief Yahoo controversy. Another example from Cleveland.com a couple days ago: http://www.cleveland.com/tribe/index.ssf/2018/01/talk_it_out_is_it_time_for_the.html

I could have sworn somebody on here advocated that the Indians should change their name in addition to the logo, but I don't care enough about this to dig through year-plus old threads.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Seems to me you are looking for trouble. Who cares if a person said that? Are they not entitled to their opinions? Will society be adversely affected if they voice that opinion?

I notice that you didn't reply to me. Why would that be? Because I advocated changing the logo but not the name and that doesn't fit into the picture you are painting, right?

Look, people are going to whine and protest about all sorts of things. That doesn't mean we have to change everything just because they do.

I think there is huge difference between what Chief Wahoo represented and what names like Braves, Blackhawks, Seminoles, and yes...even Indians represent.

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
He is a Fairy? Are we still aloud to say that? willynilly

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Originally Posted By: 40YEARSWAITING
He is a Fairy? Are we still aloud to say that? willynilly


Tinker Bell has been officially offended.


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
4
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
4
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Originally Posted By: Tulsa
Originally Posted By: 40YEARSWAITING
He is a Fairy? Are we still aloud to say that? willynilly


Tinker Bell has been officially offended.


By my spelling of allowed?

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,899
Originally Posted By: Haus


I could have sworn somebody on here advocated that the Indians should change their name in addition to the logo, but I don't care enough about this to dig through year-plus old threads.


That may have been me. BUT, I wasn't advocating for the name to be changed. I said it too could go and I can understand the arguments for it to be changed. I then said if they did get rid of it they should revert back to the Cleveland Spiders. Mainly because it has historical context with the city. However, it could be a cursed name as they were one of the worst sports teams ever. I think they won like 20 and lost 150 or something. But, at our current rate the Browns may not be far off that record...

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
If only we would have went w/a different name than the "Browns" when we were reincarnated....

It's that damn elf. He put a curse on the Browns!!!

Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Everything Else... Chief Wahoo dropped

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5