|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450 |
Do they or have they had a Second Amendment?
What other country has the Freedom and Rights that we have in the USA?
Maybe you just answered what's so different. Look, I stand for the second amendment. But it comes at a price. These school shootings are a part of that price. We have more guns in our country than we have people. With that goes the responsibility to protect and make allowances for those guns being in our society. More laws won't solve the problem. But taking protections to prevent mass school shootings is part of ponying up for the cost of these freedoms. People wish to blame it on the exact same problems the rest of the globe faces and that's not it. What we have to do is put metal detectors at school entrances and stop the guns from getting into these schools in the first place. We can dance around it all we wish, but you're not going to keep guns out of the hands of every crazy person when there's more guns floating around than we have people. So why does the rest of the globe want to come here? They really don't. Poor countries like Cuba might want to come here, but the rest of the world doesn't view the US the way they once did. We are no longer the country our ancestors immigrated to. People just don't realize it because of all the 'Merika rah rah BS going around.
"You're gonna do WHAT?!" -Tim Robbins as Merlin in Top Gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450 |
We Americans fought and clawed for our Freedom from England. Truth, although sometimes I think it would've been better wind up like Canada did  We fought and clawed against the French and Indians. Truth. Can't blame the Indians though for wanting their land back.Then we had to fight and claw against the Brits again in 1812. True again... man we do a lot of fighting.
We fought and clawed our way across this vast continent. Truth, we had to kill a lot of indigenous people to claim our continent!Then we fought and clawed each other over States Rights vs a Federal government system. So you're one of those people who really think that war was about states rights? Ok, the state's right to own people maybe. Not the best example of fighting and clawing.
It is in our DNA to fight and claw. Not necessarily a good thing to always be the aggressor.
This makes our people different from those in Europe! Comparing the two is foolish. Do you really think Europe hasn't been fighting and clawing their way through their own crap? Because they have! For over 1000 years LONGER THAN AMERICA!Why can't people see that Europe has existed so much longer than us, and that they're wiser with age. We're a freaking toddler compared to them. We would be wise to look to them for our lead.
Last edited by 442Dawg; 03/28/18 09:01 AM.
"You're gonna do WHAT?!" -Tim Robbins as Merlin in Top Gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
You're stuck on that tide pods thing like a crack addict! How about a solution instead of "I'm going to post stuff until something works because I'm scared of losing my guns"...
Parenting like what, your parents? How did that work out?
From what I've seen of these Parkland kids I'd be damn proud to be one of their parents, DAMN PROUD! your proud of the kids that are bullying people so badly online and in person that they are driving people shoot up schools? We dealt with physical bullies, today these kids are bullying psychologically like we never seen before, and you are seeing the effects of it in the amount of shootings IMO. Also, I was told even if you disagree with someone, no matter what - show some respect. I wouldn't be proud of my teenage son going on live tv dropping Fbombs like they were candy.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
We would be wise to look to them for our lead. that's why the world has always looked to us, and that's why EU has tried to mimic OUR values and our way of life. Dude, move. plain and simple, you obviously hate the country and our values - move to cuba where you love being told what you can and cannot do, since you cant obviously have a free thought for yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,172
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,172 |
Yeah go ahead and delete my posts when you don't like the truth. Whatever refs.
People who don't want people to own guns are flat out wishing to become corporate slaves in the future. Corps own our politicians and the next step to controlling the people is disarming them. Once you can't defend yourselves and the corps use their enormous money to completely and blatantly buy off all the politicians and pass only the laws that benefit lawyers and big business monopolies you can kiss your constitutional rights goodbye.
They will legalize drugs to keep you dull witted and happy with misery. They will legalize prostitution and every act of sodomy to destroy the family unit and morality. You will become like lambs to the slaughter who can't find their own way and just get pushed into the slaughter trenches.
But by all means feel SAFE when just the criminals have guns. Then not only will school still be unsafe but you won't even have the ability to defend your home and family even if you wanted to.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
Prostitution is legal in Europe yet their family units seem to be stronger than ours.
Netherlands legalized weed years ago, and they are going strong and one of the happiest places in the world.
I dunno why the refs deleted your post, but I do know the evidence around the world certainly doesn’t support your opinion.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450 |
Yeah go ahead and delete my posts when you don't like the truth. Whatever refs.
People who don't want people to own guns are flat out wishing to become corporate slaves in the future. Corps own our politicians and the next step to controlling the people is disarming them. Once you can't defend yourselves and the corps use their enormous money to completely and blatantly buy off all the politicians and pass only the laws that benefit lawyers and big business monopolies you can kiss your constitutional rights goodbye.
They will legalize drugs to keep you dull witted and happy with misery. They will legalize prostitution and every act of sodomy to destroy the family unit and morality. You will become like lambs to the slaughter who can't find their own way and just get pushed into the slaughter trenches.
But by all means feel SAFE when just the criminals have guns. Then not only will school still be unsafe but you won't even have the ability to defend your home and family even if you wanted to. Corporations and interest groups are already doing this! What world do you live in? And I'm sorry, but you're not John Rambo or John McClane. You and your Wolverines are not rising up against anyone to overthrow a government. Get over yourself.
"You're gonna do WHAT?!" -Tim Robbins as Merlin in Top Gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450 |
Prostitution is legal in Europe yet their family units seem to be stronger than ours.
Netherlands legalized weed years ago, and they are going strong and one of the happiest places in the world.
I dunno why the refs deleted your post, but I do know the evidence around the world certainly doesn’t support your opinion. +1 a thousand times over.
"You're gonna do WHAT?!" -Tim Robbins as Merlin in Top Gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450 |
We would be wise to look to them for our lead. that's why the world has always looked to us, and that's why EU has tried to mimic OUR values and our way of life. Dude, move. plain and simple, you obviously hate the country and our values - move to cuba where you love being told what you can and cannot do, since you cant obviously have a free thought for yourself. You are aware that the United States has only been around for 242 years right? England for example has been England since 1066. I don't see how the rest of the world can look to us when we didn't exist. They have been figuring this crap out for centuries! Trust me, they don't need our help. They laugh at us. And you know what, I still love living here. It's my opinion that the US is still very young in age and I have hope that one day things will change and we'll do things better. Not in my lifetime, but maybe someday we'll get it right.
"You're gonna do WHAT?!" -Tim Robbins as Merlin in Top Gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518 |
J\C I guess putting thousands of illegal guns on the street by fast FAST AND FURIOUS gets a pass by the haters and the press .... wtf did the NRA have to do with that
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450 |
J\C I guess putting thousands of illegal guns on the street by fast FAST AND FURIOUS gets a pass by the haters and the press .... wtf did the NRA have to do with that What do Paul Walker and Vin Diesel have to do with any of this?
"You're gonna do WHAT?!" -Tim Robbins as Merlin in Top Gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259 |
And you know what, I still love living here. It's my opinion that the US is still very young in age and I have hope that one day things will change and we'll do things better. Not in my lifetime, but maybe someday we'll get it right. The "don't like it? move" argument is just ergo decedo.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
J\C I guess putting thousands of illegal guns on the street by fast FAST AND FURIOUS gets a pass by the haters and the press .... wtf did the NRA have to do with that I also agree with you that sting operations are inherently problematic.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075 |
J/C
Even if you do not agree with the argument that “more guns, less crime” you cannot argue with the truth that more guns has not resulted in more crime. If crime rates remain flat or improve while gun ownership and carry increases, then there is no justification for gun control. Can you cite this truth you speak of? Studies have been done researching the effects of more guns, less crime, and it seems to be far from established truth. I found one study recently that tracked crime rates between RTC states and non, and it doesn't seem to line up: Stanford Study - RTC states have violent crime increases of up to 15%Also, one of the largest studies of it's kind noted strong links between how guns are accessed and saving lives. https://academic.oup.com/epirev/article/38/1/140/2754868 I found it a fascinating read, maybe you could spend some time and read it as well? My takeaway from it was that the observation was that increased gun control (even in minor ways) mapped to reductions in crime. They also agree with you that proof is hard to find! Freedom is the standard in America. The burden of proof is on you to prove that gun control works (something no study ever has been able to prove – as gun control has never been shown to cause a reduction in crime, violence, or homicide).
Correlation does not prove causation, but a lack of correlation does disprove causation.
When there are more guns but less crime, that does not mean that more guns are the cause of less crime, but it does prove that more guns does not cause more crime. Proof is not required to establish consensus, especially in studies where it would be unethical to try to establish proof. A good example is the vaccine debate. There are people who are against vaccinating children, and have argued for doing double blind studies on children given vaccines and other children given placebos, then evaluate the autism levels after a certain point. As you can imagine, this is not feasible because it would be unethical to expose children unwittingly to dangerous diseases when a cure is readily available. Can we prove that vaccines don't increase autism rates? Not without the double blind study. So we'll just have to do our best with what is available in the research field. The same goes with guns. You can't do a study where you send in shooters into schools with armed guards, and schools without armed guards, to prove which is more effective. It's unethical. So you demanding proof that gun control works will never actually happen because it would be unethical to perform said study. But then again, there are untold numbers of things in life we can't prove, but accept as likely the best for us. The research community has a pretty good idea of what works and what doesn't given long runs of empirical data. This also applies to gun control studies. I consider myself a smart guy but also smart enough to know that I don't know everything. I will read research papers and do my own analysis but in the case of a draw, I give favor to the researcher. They do it for a living. It has been shown time and again that the number of guns in America over the last 4 decades have increase while at the same time the FBI is showing a decrease in violent crimes over that same period. https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/915078577237848064https://drgo.us/an-editorial-critique-of...ecologic-study/
Last edited by teedub; 03/28/18 11:57 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518 |
J\C I guess that the gun slaughter going major metropolitan area run by liberals aint worthy of the little lib kiddies to being led there to protest by the press and the DNC ....hmmmmmm I wonder why
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518 |
I guess the the inner city minority kids don't matter to your little indoctrinated suburbanites SMH.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,187
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,187 |
J/C
The majority of people in the U.S. who don't want universal nation wide background checks for buying guns, are criminals.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,263
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,263 |
Do they or have they had a Second Amendment?
What other country has the Freedom and Rights that we have in the USA?
Maybe you just answered what's so different. Look, I stand for the second amendment. But it comes at a price. These school shootings are a part of that price. We have more guns in our country than we have people. With that goes the responsibility to protect and make allowances for those guns being in our society. More laws won't solve the problem. But taking protections to prevent mass school shootings is part of ponying up for the cost of these freedoms. People wish to blame it on the exact same problems the rest of the globe faces and that's not it. What we have to do is put metal detectors at school entrances and stop the guns from getting into these schools in the first place. We can dance around it all we wish, but you're not going to keep guns out of the hands of every crazy person when there's more guns floating around than we have people. So why does the rest of the globe want to come here? Once again you failed to address anything that was posted. I'm sure they don't want to come here because we have mass school shootings. And I'm pretty sure there isn't some mass exodus from Great Britain, France and Italy swarming into the United states. So much for addressing the topic.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,187
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,187 |
So why does the rest of the globe want to come here?  They don't. Not anymore. And if you think that's a good thing, I feel sorry for you.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,263
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,263 |
They should know only people from crap hole countries want to come here. I mean they rant about it all the time.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No, it wasn’t mostly young people.)Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers. Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18. The average age of the adults in the crowd was just under 49 years old, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monk...m=.fefe07d2eb85 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,172
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,172 |
Prostitution is legal in Europe yet their family units seem to be stronger than ours.
Netherlands legalized weed years ago, and they are going strong and one of the happiest places in the world.
I dunno why the refs deleted your post, but I do know the evidence around the world certainly doesn’t support your opinion. Actually their divorce rates are higher than ours but don't worry we are catching up fast. Their amount of single parents are skyrocketing which is just horrible for their future. And sure Amsterdam is great if your a fan of children being used as prostitutes because that just bring lots of joy and stoned otherwise. Then again they can't figure out why suicide rates in the so called happiest places on earth are so high either. When you live for the sins of the flesh it always ends up consuming you. Then again animals don't plan for the future they just live in the moment. If it feels good that is all that matters right? To hell with the consequences that come afterwards like kids growing up in broken homes.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,263
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,263 |
It's a good thing human trafficking only occurs over there.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 52,481 |
http://www.businessinsider.com/map-divorce-rates-around-the-world-2014-5we outdo the vast majority of european countries. again, what you're saying isn't lining up with the facts. how many kids die to gun violence compared to other developed nations? at the end of the day, you're talking about all this other nonsense instead of the issue at hand. and its sad because your spin job is still proving you incorrect.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450 |
Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No, it wasn’t mostly young people.)Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers. Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18. The average age of the adults in the crowd was just under 49 years old, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monk...m=.fefe07d2eb85 Well, think about this, how many adults were there supporting their kids that were there? And who cares how old the protesters were? I don't. I'm happy to see people out there protesting and I hope it leads to change. Getting hung up on the age of the average protester completely ignores the reason why people are protesting. And it's done for show and distraction. Nice try.
"You're gonna do WHAT?!" -Tim Robbins as Merlin in Top Gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450 |
Prostitution is legal in Europe yet their family units seem to be stronger than ours.
Netherlands legalized weed years ago, and they are going strong and one of the happiest places in the world.
I dunno why the refs deleted your post, but I do know the evidence around the world certainly doesn’t support your opinion. Actually their divorce rates are higher than ours but don't worry we are catching up fast. Their amount of single parents are skyrocketing which is just horrible for their future. And sure Amsterdam is great if your a fan of children being used as prostitutes because that just bring lots of joy and stoned otherwise. Then again they can't figure out why suicide rates in the so called happiest places on earth are so high either. When you live for the sins of the flesh it always ends up consuming you. Then again animals don't plan for the future they just live in the moment. If it feels good that is all that matters right? To hell with the consequences that come afterwards like kids growing up in broken homes. I guess you don't know what qualifies a country as one of the happiest places to live. One of the criteria is suicide rates, and they have one of the lowest.
"You're gonna do WHAT?!" -Tim Robbins as Merlin in Top Gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No, it wasn’t mostly young people.)Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers. Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18. The average age of the adults in the crowd was just under 49 years old, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monk...m=.fefe07d2eb85 Well, think about this, how many adults were there supporting their kids that were there? Apparently 9 to every child. How many were with you?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No, it wasn’t mostly young people.)Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers. Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18. The average age of the adults in the crowd was just under 49 years old, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monk...m=.fefe07d2eb85 Well, think about this, how many adults were there supporting their kids that were there? Apparently 9 to every child. How many were with you? lol Math....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 |
Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No, it wasn’t mostly young people.)Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers. Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18. The average age of the adults in the crowd was just under 49 years old, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monk...m=.fefe07d2eb85 Well, think about this, how many adults were there supporting their kids that were there? Apparently 9 to every child. How many were with you? lol Math.... 1 + 1 = 2 as an old buddy used to say. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,974 |
1 + 1 = 2 as an old buddy used to say. thumbsup
or apparently 1+1=9
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815 |
1 + 1 = 2 as an old buddy used to say. thumbsup
or apparently 1+1=9 Saw a lot of Pink Hat people there.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 450 |
Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No, it wasn’t mostly young people.)Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers. Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18. The average age of the adults in the crowd was just under 49 years old, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monk...m=.fefe07d2eb85 Well, think about this, how many adults were there supporting their kids that were there? Apparently 9 to every child. How many were with you? lol Math.... 1 + 1 = 2 as an old buddy used to say. I guess you all missed this part of my post, or intentionally ignored it: "And who cares how old the protesters were? I don't. I'm happy to see people out there protesting and I hope it leads to change. Getting hung up on the age of the average protester completely ignores the reason why people are protesting. And it's done for show and distraction. Nice try." My point was that the numbers would be skewed due to young kids being there with their parents. And don't get me started on math. I am confident in my math having excelled in the highest level math courses tOSU has to offer.
"You're gonna do WHAT?!" -Tim Robbins as Merlin in Top Gun
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
Here’s who actually attended the March for Our Lives. (No, it wasn’t mostly young people.)Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers. Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18. The average age of the adults in the crowd was just under 49 years old, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monk...m=.fefe07d2eb85 Well, think about this, how many adults were there supporting their kids that were there? More probable theory: How many kids live in Washington DC? It's not exactly a big city made up by a lot of suburban families.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259 |
Unfortunately those two variables aren't solely dependent on each other. If you are showing me that chart to say that more guns means less murder, I can show how silly it is with one more chart. It's just as easy for me to correlate rise in vehicle usage and reduction in vehicle deaths: People who are arguing for more guns is like saying we need more cars on the road. You and I both know that is not why the vehicle death rate has been going down. Vehicle safety measures and training, rather, are what contributes significantly to improving vehicle safety. If we just kept adding cars but did nothing at all make them safer, our death rates wouldn't magically go down. Why do we think that will work with guns?
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815 |
Despite media narrative, study says teenagers made up just 10 percent of March for Our Lives crowd http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/...ives-crowd.htmlA university professor studying large-scale, Trump-era protests in Washington says the media is giving the wrong impression about who made up the crowd during last weekend’s anti-gun March for Our Lives demonstration. “My research tells a different story about who participated in the March for Our Lives — and it is more complicated and less well-packaged for prime time,” University of Maryland sociology professor Dana R. Fisher wrote in a Wednesday story for the Washington Post. Fisher’s study indicates that -- while news coverage focused on the teenagers marching for gun control in the wake of last month’s shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida --- 90 percent of the crowd was actually adults. She said the average age of adults in the crowd was just under 49.“Contrary to what’s been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers,” Fisher wrote. “Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18.”Fisher said her team sampled 256 people who were randomly selected. Her research will become a book titled “American Resistance” and will be published after the midterm elections. Fisher also expressed skepticism that all those who showed up to the march were there primarily because of their views on guns. Some, she said, came for entertainment.“The March for Our Lives had the allure of a free concert — in fact, the event’s website maintained a list of performers but never listed the speakers," she said. "But it is one thing to turn out to watch Lin-Manuel Miranda and Ariana Grande perform, and quite another to vote in the midterm election in November.” The research follows an imaging company saying the turnout for the march was much less than claimed by its organizers. Organizers of the demonstration claimed Sunday that some 850,000 people attended the pro-gun control event. But Virginia-based Digital Design & Imaging Service Inc., which uses aerial photos to calculate crowd sizes, reported the event’s peak crowd size was at 202,796 people
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,797
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 34,797 |
So you thought there were no adults out there supporting these kids? Come on man. The leading activists were the kids and yes they got plenty of help from adults, probably libs for the most part AND financial backing. BFD. I have a newsflash for you, there are a lot of conservatives in that 70+ percent that support gun control laws. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/28/gun-control-polling-parkland-430099
Last edited by OldColdDawg; 03/29/18 04:34 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,075 |
Ahhhh......but I never said more guns was the result of less crime....I was just showing that crime rates have dropped significantly despite a continued increase in the number of guns in the public’s hands.....people can draw what they get conclusion they want from that.
And the making cars safer analogy......despite all the safety improvements death by car ACCIDENT still exceeds all deaths by guns.....now we really must take out the suicide deaths by gun because the utopia known as Australia showed that while banning gun ownership caused suicide by gun to drop, all other suicide by other means rose resulting in no significant change in the suicide rate.....so the +20k tgat die by suicide by gun will still commit suicide by the Australian standard anyway and should be factored out of the gun debate (tgat is not minI mixing the suicide debate, it is a huge problem that is not adequately being addressed, but tying it to guns does neither debate any justice). Then factor out criminals killing criminals...who effin cares that they are selectively removing themselves from the gene pool. That leave true innocent victim homicide and accidental death which from fbi crime stats are very low. In fact from the CDC (wisqars)...from 1981 to present the US has seen a drop in accidental gun deaths from a high of about 1900 a year to about 500 in 2013 with a steady downward trend....so we want to create laws and regulations to decrease gun accidents which are all ready miniscule and falling? Seems like the product is safe on its own based on the fact that safe car accidents kill 33,000 a year in the US while unsafe gun accidents kill 500. And let’s not forget that there are only about 270 million vehicles in the US while the number of guns present is between 300 and 400 million.
Emotion clouds thus debate.....it is why “now is not the time” is repeated immediately after a shooting....it leads to ill-conceived knee jerk laws.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,172
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,172 |
or more like a few kids went out with their parents to push the liberal agenda of stripping away american's right to protect themselves just because law enforcement failed to do its job.
It's a great sense of logic. Police can't keep you safe so you shouldn't be allowed to keep yourself safe either. In short just die to criminals America! Thank you so much LIBS!
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,187
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 16,187 |
Apparently 9 to every child. How many were with you? If every U.S. adult protected and listened to nine students, we'd be a lot better off. Just saying.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,259 |
Ahhhh......but I never said more guns was the result of less crime....I was just showing that crime rates have dropped significantly despite a continued increase in the number of guns in the public’s hands.....people can draw what they get conclusion they want from that. Ahh okay, so you admit to posting up meaningless stats? That's unfortunate teetub. And the making cars safer analogy......despite all the safety improvements death by car ACCIDENT still exceeds all deaths by guns.....now we really must take out the suicide deaths by gun because the utopia known as Australia showed that while banning gun ownership caused suicide by gun to drop, all other suicide by other means rose resulting in no significant change in the suicide rate.....so the +20k tgat die by suicide by gun will still commit suicide by the Australian standard anyway and should be factored out of the gun debate (tgat is not minI mixing the suicide debate, it is a huge problem that is not adequately being addressed, but tying it to guns does neither debate any justice). Then factor out criminals killing criminals...who effin cares that they are selectively removing themselves from the gene pool. That leave true innocent victim homicide and accidental death which from fbi crime stats are very low. In fact from the CDC (wisqars)...from 1981 to present the US has seen a drop in accidental gun deaths from a high of about 1900 a year to about 500 in 2013 with a steady downward trend....so we want to create laws and regulations to decrease gun accidents which are all ready miniscule and falling? Seems like the product is safe on its own based on the fact that safe car accidents kill 33,000 a year in the US while unsafe gun accidents kill 500. And let’s not forget that there are only about 270 million vehicles in the US while the number of guns present is between 300 and 400 million. You show a lack of understanding in establishing dependent variables to draw correlations. You do not account for the amount of time the average american spends in a car vs the amount of time they spend around a gun that is being used (not just carried). The remaining words you wrote are so disjointed and so difficult to read that my attempts gave me a headache. You appear to want to prove that guns are in fact the answer, but instead of using data to back it up, you instead have your answer already. And with your answer in hand, you cherry pick information in an attempt to support your position. This is poor data collection technique and non scientific. Emotion clouds thus debate.....it is why “now is not the time” is repeated immediately after a shooting....it leads to ill-conceived knee jerk laws. No, it's repeated to help avoid any laws being written period. It took 12 years from the time James Brady was paralyzed until the bill that bore his name was made law. We have done absolutely nothing meaningful since Sandy Hook happened several years ago. We have done nothing since Vegas. And Congress has still done nothing since Parkland. Show me these examples of these ill-conceived knee jerk laws passed and enacted recently, please.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus March for our lives, 2018...
|
|