He's directly guilty of trying to de-fraud an investigation because he was trying to influence the presidential election. He's the one that purposely changed the wording in the Clinton report, went soft on Hillary when he interviewed her, and let his bias interfere with his professional job.
His ethics are disgusting and not deemed worthy of the FBI that is for DAMN sure. A lot of people within the organization hate that guys guts because it gives them a bad reputation. You act like none of this stuff is real or something. I'm sorry but you're living in denial.
And where exactly is the evidence, not the fox news reports, the evidence?
There's pages of evidence of his actions, some of it classified but other data is not. You do understand there was a reason he was called in front of congress right?
All of this is common knowledge. Do you deny that his text messages exist? You know he was the individual mainly in charge of the Clinton email investigation right? Just because you refuse to find this stuff out its not my fault. I don't have time to explain everything.
There's pages of evidence of his actions, some of it classified but other data is not. You do understand there was a reason he was called in front of congress right?
Yes, GOP efforts to smear the Mueller investigation. You seem to have bought into the smear campaign.
All of this is common knowledge. Do you deny that his text messages exist? You know he was the individual mainly in charge of the Clinton email investigation right? Just because you refuse to find this stuff out its not my fault. I don't have time to explain everything.
LOL. His text between his girlfriend and him were personal, and he is allowed to have his opinions. I can tell you right now, just about everyone in your life with any authority has opinions, from political leaders to law enforcement. Part of the job is to not act on those but to act in a way fitting the job. As far as I could see, he did. Trump however has not.
1. Bias is clearly present, his text messages demonstrate that he was against Trump and "wanted to stop him." Over his dead body that he would make Hillary Clinton look bad or actually bring charges against her.
2. The guy worked under Comey and was part of the email investigation against Clinton. He was in charge of many responsibilities. Gee.... why would we want someone who has clear bias doing that kind of work....
People tend to forget that he did not like Hillary or Bernie either.
Like many people he was dumbfounded by the things that Trump the candidate would say. No less different than many others including republican politicians.
You also deny the fact that if he really wanted to influence the election we would have known that Trump was under investigation prior to the election.
Trumps love of everything Russian belies normal behavior of Americans. We suspect that Trump has a lot of money from the Russians but the amount is unknown.
Please provide links to these claims that he's guilty of defrauding an investigation. I do what I can to keep up on current events but that's a new one for me.
As for changing the wording, laying that on Strzok is pure conjecture. I run an office full of people who report to me. I tell people to do things all the time. While there would be some accountability if one of my reports changed something, the real responsibility would lie with me. The same applies with Comey.
Can you provide the transcripts of his interview with Hillary?
Can you provide substantial evidence that "a lot of people" (your words) hate Strzok's guts?
Lastly, it is quite literally impossible to operate without bias. Bias is not always bad either. Detectives run into bias all the time. They review evidence, interview suspects or persons of interest, and those will create inferences. Those inferences often become biases. This bias can be detrimental if the inference is wrong, but it can also be beneficial if the inference is correct, as it can help uncover avenues for new clues. It's a popular dart to throw at someone to say "they are biased" but in reality what you should be saying is you disagree with their view.
I think it's a good thing to shake up the powers that be who think they are invulnerable to punishment. It send an important message to the lower ranks that they need to work on restoring the integrity and fairness of the investigations they do. The corruption and flat out incompetence has simply got to be cleaned up.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
'What the Hell's Going on at the FBI?' Graham Rips Feds for Feinstein-Trump 'Double Standard'
South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham said he is sending a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray asking for an explanation of DOJ policy after news of a troubling incident five years ago involving a top Democratic senator and a suspected Chinese spy.
At the time, the FBI informed Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) that a man employed by her office was suspected of being a spy for the Chinese government. Feinstein took action and fired the man.
Graham said President Donald Trump was not afforded the same courtesy during a similar counter-intelligence investigation by the FBI into Russian election hacking.
Graham said the FBI should have told Trump it was suspicious of then-aides Carter Page and George Papadopoulos and the pair's alleged ties to Russia.
"Why didn't they do for Trump what they did for Feinstein?" he asked. "What the hell is going on at the FBI?"
Harris Faulkner added that if the FBI indeed was concerned about counter-intelligence versus its alleged partisan leanings, it also should have informed Trump of then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort's past alleged indiscretions.
His text between his girlfriend and him were personal, and he is allowed to have his opinions.
Really, because you have blasting trump for personal things he has said for years now. Double standard, however coming from the gutter, not a surprise.
'What the Hell's Going on at the FBI?' Graham Rips Feds for Feinstein-Trump 'Double Standard'
South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham said he is sending a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray asking for an explanation of DOJ policy after news of a troubling incident five years ago involving a top Democratic senator and a suspected Chinese spy.
At the time, the FBI informed Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) that a man employed by her office was suspected of being a spy for the Chinese government. Feinstein took action and fired the man.
Graham said President Donald Trump was not afforded the same courtesy during a similar counter-intelligence investigation by the FBI into Russian election hacking.
Graham said the FBI should have told Trump it was suspicious of then-aides Carter Page and George Papadopoulos and the pair's alleged ties to Russia.
"Why didn't they do for Trump what they did for Feinstein?" he asked. "What the hell is going on at the FBI?"
Harris Faulkner added that if the FBI indeed was concerned about counter-intelligence versus its alleged partisan leanings, it also should have informed Trump of then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort's past alleged indiscretions.
Senator Graham must have forgot the bit were Papadopoulos seemed to be on a mission for the Trump Campaign when he told and Australian the Russians had dirt on Hillary. The campaign was then a suspect. You don't tell the suspect.
And Page was thought to have been duped but not charged of wrong doing in his previous encounter. He was on the radar but not as a spy.
I think it's a good thing to shake up the powers that be who think they are invulnerable to punishment. It send an important message to the lower ranks that they need to work on restoring the integrity and fairness of the investigations they do. The corruption and flat out incompetence has simply got to be cleaned up.
Huh? That's incredibly risky and can backfire in an incredibly demoralizing way. If an employee is guilty of misconduct you deal with it. Misconduct that is easily demonstrated will not affect morale negatively. It should even boost it. If however, a CEO fires a manager for vague reasons like "shaking things up" or "I think they think they are invulnerable to punishment" then that will do nothing but breed resentment in the organization.
I can't be the only one in this forum who manages people... To be as charitable as I possibly can be, this idea is perhaps one of the dumbest I have ever heard if your goal is to improve how an organization functions.
I think it's a good thing to shake up the powers that be who think they are invulnerable to punishment. It send an important message to the lower ranks that they need to work on restoring the integrity and fairness of the investigations they do. The corruption and flat out incompetence has simply got to be cleaned up.
Huh? That's incredibly risky and can backfire in an incredibly demoralizing way. If an employee is guilty of misconduct you deal with it. Misconduct that is easily demonstrated will not affect morale negatively. It should even boost it. If however, a CEO fires a manager for vague reasons like "shaking things up" or "I think they think they are invulnerable to punishment" then that will do nothing but breed resentment in the organization.
I can't be the only one in this forum who manages people... To be as charitable as I possibly can be, this idea is perhaps one of the dumbest I have ever heard if your goal is to improve how an organization functions.
A well established company, feeling it was time for a shake-up, hired a new CEO. The new boss was determined to rid the company of all slackers.
On a tour of the facilities, the CEO noticed a guy leaning on a wall. The room was full of workers and he wanted to let them know that he meant business.
He walked up to the guy leaning against the wall and asked, "How much money do you make a week?"
A little surprised, the young man looked at him and replied, "I make $400 a week. Why?"
The CEO then hands the guy $1,600 in cash and screams, "Here's four weeks' pay, now GET OUT and don't come back!"
Feeling pretty good about himself, the CEO looked around the room and asked, "Does anyone want to tell me what that idiot slacker did here?"
From across the room came a voice: "He was the pizza delivery guy from Domino's
When a Republican president is elected we can have no one in any place of authority that doesn't have blind love for that president.
When we have a Democratic president, we can't have anyone in power that doesn't have blind love for that president.
You can't say anything about your political beliefs for fear of being labeled as a bad person and being treated as though you're being interrogated by Sen. Joe McCarthy.
Innuendo will be thrown around and stated as facts and you character will be attacked.
Murica!
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
