DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus How to destroy a family

Where exactly shall I pack a L that belongs to you? I lack sufficient luggage.

Tell me again about the number system computers use?

Well, that's convenient, isn't it?

It was July of this year? Odd.

Sorry, the proof part is on you. You stated I said something about Ohio not having castle doctrine. I'd love to read what I posted concerning that.

Perhaps you can find it. If you do, and I said what you say I said, (that Ohio has no castle doctrine) I will gladly eat crow.

However, I would expect the same from you if you can't find where I said that. Deal?

I just would be really surprised that I said, in July of 2018, that Ohio didn't have a castle doctrine. Even if I said that in July of 2017.

I'll give you an out here. It IS possible I said that at SOME POINT in the past Ohio didn't have castle doctrine - because I do remember posting something along the lines of "without castle doctrine, you had to first attempt to flee from your home......"

Show me the thread. I'll gladly eat crow if I'm proven wrong. I have no problem with that.

binary literally uses Arabian numerals, based on the I Ching, and only works because of boolean algebra. I'm surprised someone who works in IT for 14 hours a day had to google that computers ran on binary numbers, in an algebraic system. Quite frankly, that's so common that I expect my 4 year old nephew could tell me that immediately after waking up from a nap. I wish I could say your post surprised me.

Do you have anything we can give him to put this L he tries to keep giving me back?

Lobotomies, domestic violence, and turkey basters...what a week this has been.

I did it for you.

Amazingly inaccurate. Binary uses on and off, that is why it works with computers, actually switches. 0 and 1. What I googled was who invented it. Knew the name, but did not connect it with binary. The Arabic numbers are referred to as Arabic, not Arabian. Binary math does not work like algebra. and, nand, or, xor, another one, I think. Don't need to use binary at all, just understand what it is.

Never, ever said I worked 14 hours a day, not even close. Haven't done that since before you were born. You sure make up a lot of stuff.

Why did you pick the theme song from one of the most racist movies ever made for your marriage post? Does your marriage support slavery and racism? Like the flags and statues, it should be torn down immediately because you support slavery!

I would suggest 6 cms above the left high and through the prefrontal cortex :v

Me, I'll go dead center upper torso.

They use AND, OR, NOT, NAND, NOR, EXOR and EXNOR gates and you can look at truth tables to determine the output.

Just basic logic gates.

Well, only one thing to do now. Follow through. Don't go out complaining.

Don't remember a NOT, you sure? Been a very long time. No real use for it in the real world.

I saw the math as largely substitution, which, I guess, ones and zeros, it pretty much is.

Used mainly in circuit design, not really my field, I fix 'em, network 'em, not design 'em.

It ain't Arabic, anyway.

The binary code that uses logic gates is literally built on algebra and only works because of boolean algebra, which is all about logic gates. There's a reason why Microsoft wasn't created when binary was, because simple binary couldn't make a computer run.

Also what marriage post and what racist movie? You need to add more clarity if you want people to take you seriously.

NOT gate is a single input single output, if you put in a high 1 you'll get a low 0 output. If you input a low 0 you get a high 1 output.

It's the triangle with the bubble on the output.

Are you serious?

It's literally built on AND, OR, and NOT. Have you never visited a website before?

Thanks for that. It would appear that I never said that Ohio had no castle doctrine. In fact, I stated Ohio HAD castle doctrine.

Am I wrong here?

Nelson is the weirdest bird I've ever come across on the internet (and that's a crowded field).

Please, all you have to do is break into his house, and he will scourer as he did before.....his words.

J/C

Am I the only that noticed when Clem post and destroys nelson, he goes on a tangent about himself - almost as if his ego knows he's going to get run circles around him, and he instantly goes into defense mode. J/S its fun to watch.

I would assume he has either crawled back to the shadows, or has been put in a timeout by now, just thought I would I share my observation

It's hysterical to watch him miss the point. Obviously, we have no reason to doubt him telling us his wife likes to get tied down. She committed perjury for a child molester, obviously she has authority issues. Watching him flail in a verbal firestorm of bad forum etiquette, while completely missing the issue at hand is a Nelson past time. This one was just far more spectacular. I could honestly take another day or two of this lol.

From reading the story and knowing nothing else about the situation, if the man is a POS, the woman is an equally big smelly POS..

While I disagree with some of Nelson's generalizations, he has a valid point that our entire system is geared toward assuming that men are guilty and women are victims in domestic issues.. its also universally assumed that if there is any doubt at all, the woman is the better provider for the children.

I've seen enough in my life to know, that entire premise is total BS. Within my extended circle of friends and family I've seen stories similar to this one play out and not always kids in their 20s, sometimes older adults in their 40s.. I've known my share of women who cheated on their husbands, left their husbands for other men, been emotionally and/or physically abusive to their husbands and to their kids.. and they fully expect that there will be NO repercussions for their actions. They fully understand that if the neighbors find out or if the authorities get involved, they, as the woman, will be given every benefit of the doubt.

This may be a wildly unpopular thing to say but we are creating a very confused generation of younger folks.. both young men and young women.. especially if they grew up in a less that stable environment... and many aren't handling it particularly well.

So I ask the question, and I'm not saying it is the case in this situation because I think the young man AND the young woman, both seem unprepared to raise a child.. but in general, how much emotional and physical abuse should a man take before he takes action? And if that action is, well he should just leave... why should he leave when there is still a 90% chance he's going to lose half his stuff and his kids when he is NOT the one who is abusive?

No one should take any type of abuse. First and foremost. As far as what actions he should take- I would go and say anything he needs to due, up to the point of raising a hand to his wife. I don't care if she is actively trying to punch you in the face. Grab her, hold her down even, but the second you HIT her, your done in my book. And I say this to anyone on the board, ANYONE - that thinks hitting a women in ANY instance is ok or even justified, you are not a man.

I do agree that mothers get the benefit of the doubt in a courtroom, its nothing like it was in the 70,80, or even 90s though. My father had full custody of my half brother in the 80s mind you. I have a brother who has 50/50 equal custody with his son, and I have a brother who has 0 which long story short, he doesn't deserve or is qualified to have any custody.

I can honestly say, that the court system in my own little world and experiences with that matter has been actually spot on and fair in every scenario. Truly has. Does that mean it is for everyone, heck no. But I certainly do not think its like a lot of the older guys who have had gone through it used to be like. 95% is a made up number he threw out there - with little to no facts behind it.

I think what you are talking about, and what nelson was talking about is a perceived biased against fathers. You are saying their is a perceived biased against fathers in the courts and court system, yet when others on here say there is a biased against, idk - black folks (not you btw, but def nelson), he and others have stated they are making things up and its falsehoods.

Its funny that when WE are the ones in the category of the perceived biases, we see so clearly those biases. But when we are not in that bias, eh - its not really there.

But back to your question - if a women is being abusive, my answer would depend on if there is a child in the house.

with no child, leave and call the authorities, calmly and with respect. tell them the situation. If she is abusive and they show up and the man is calm and collective and she is not, I highly doubt they would tell the gentleman he has to leave.

If there is a child in the house, you get the child, you call the authorities and immediately apply for a PFA from the women for you and the child. You then immediately contact a lawyer and file for sole custody. It will now be on record the police report and the abuse that was just obtained.

As far as losing 90% of his stuff - seems like that number is a little inflated don't you think? I believe the saying is half....but again, that all depends now on actual earnings and custody anymore. I actually see this pretty often being in the banking industry - I get subpoenas for bank statements and records, etc. I hear the stories EVERYTIME that goes with it, typically both sides. Each side makes a compelling argument why they are getting fleeced and both the man and woman are both the victims of the other. Point being, there are 2 sides to every story. We tend to believe the ones we WANT to believe.

I agree. No man should ever punch a woman.
Because of frame size and such, it would be like punching a child.

If you really need to defend yourself from a woman, either leave the area or tell her she looks fat. Both work equally well.

man what kinda weird ass crap is going on in this thread?