|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,098 Likes: 134
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,098 Likes: 134 |
There are a ton of good arguments for and against the electoral College.. I'm not sure which way is the best to go.. Much studying needs done.
As for any president being able to pardon himself, REALLY, is that a thing? Seriously.. Can a president pardon himself?
I'm all for that to be made impossible.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,331 |
I understand what the electoral college was first intended to do. Now it serves a different purpose.
I'm not a fan of the Popular Vote Idea. But I also don't like the way the Electoral College is at this point. I'd rather keep the college, but give out votes proportionally instead of winner take all.
Winning a state by 1,000 votes shouldn't give you all the delegates. It should give you a percentage portion of what you earned.
In a state like mine (Connecticut), where politicians only come to fundraise at expensive dinners for our wealthiest, I feel like i never get a chance to see a candidate. This would give me a chance because candidates wouldn't take for granted that all our votes will go Democrat. They'd be working for something more than fundraising dollars.
Small states like Wyoming and Vermont should be protected so that their people get a chance to feel represented by the government by having the electoral college.
And states like Ohio and Florida won't get all the coverage because they're "battleground" states. They won't be so important, which seems fair to me.
IMO, Democrats will be winning the popular vote for some time. As long as Texas continues to go more and more blue (which it is), the democrats will continue to win the Popular Vote. While the state might stay Red, the margin will continue to decrease. Meanwhile California's margin will probably stay the same.
My system is more equatable. The small states will still have an advantage (as their population counts more per vote, so they won't be forgotten), while a state like Florida won't send all their votes one way or another in a nail biter election (making the candidate who loses that state's efforts a complete waste)
UCONN HUSKIES 2014 Champions of Basketball
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 Likes: 116
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 25,823 Likes: 116 |
All they have to do is get the Senate to agree and the President to sign it. Baw Haw BahHawhahahahahahahahaha snort
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,518 |
Hey 40...Why do you have throw cold water on the poor dems. schemes to rig the elections shame on you.....LMAO
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
I think that if an electoral college could work in the 20th century, it needs to place the voter in the state they grew up in. Republican states can no longer mismanage themselves to where every Democrat leaves, and they win presidential land slide victories.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,489 Likes: 723
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,489 Likes: 723 |
Good. Get rid of it. It’s an outdated system.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
- Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,659 Likes: 673
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,659 Likes: 673 |
Hey 40...Why do you have throw cold water on the poor dems. schemes to rig the elections shame on you.....LMAO Oh you are right, making the votes of people actually count would be rigging the election. smh
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,659 Likes: 673
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,659 Likes: 673 |
All they have to do is get the Senate to agree and the President to sign it. Baw Haw BahHawhahahahahahahahaha snort An amendment like this would be a death knell to the troglodyte voter. No more grip on major parties based in hate. And this can be done without consent from your side if States call for a convention. How many States are run by Dems right now?
Last edited by OldColdDawg; 01/04/19 01:19 PM.
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,098 Likes: 134
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,098 Likes: 134 |
Winning a state by 1,000 votes shouldn't give you all the delegates. It should give you a percentage portion of what you earned. How would that work? A state has 25 Electoral votes (that would be 100%) Candidate A gets 3 Million votes Candidate B gets 2 million votes Candidate A therefore receive 15 electoral votes Candidate B therefore received 10 Electoral Votes Do I have that right? I could deal with that. I think it means my vote would count again...
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,098 Likes: 134
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,098 Likes: 134 |
All they have to do is get the Senate to agree and the President to sign it. Baw Haw BahHawhahahahahahahahaha snort And you think that's funny..... geez
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,098 Likes: 134
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,098 Likes: 134 |
Hey 40...Why do you have throw cold water on the poor dems. schemes to rig the elections shame on you.....LMAO Republicans complaining about rigging schemes,,, That's precious.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,659 Likes: 673
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,659 Likes: 673 |
I support this bill. It's pure common sense and fair to all.
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26 |
Hard to imagine that people in OHIO want to diminish their voices. Is it only because your candidate lost?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253 Likes: 16
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253 Likes: 16 |
Hard to imagine that people in OHIO want to diminish their voices. Is it only because your candidate lost? Trump won 37 states, Hill won 13. Liberals want to make this the United States of California.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337 |
Hard to imagine that people in OHIO want to diminish their voices. Is it only because your candidate lost? I think you can look at it from both directions. Gerrymandering has made the electoral college a joke. Nothing it was intended to be. Now if your party gains from this you would want to continue the status quo. Now if your party had lost two presidential elections by winning the popular vote by millions and still losing the election you would want that changed. But there are some factors I think are worth considering here. On average a state is awarded one electoral vote for every 565,166 people. Now let's take a state like Wyoming. Wyoming has three electoral votes and only 532,668 citizens (as of 2008 estimates). As a result each of Wyoming's three electoral votes corresponds to 177,556 people. Understood in one way, these people have 3.18 times as much clout in the Electoral College as an average American. States such as Alaska, N. Dakota, S. Dakota and Nebraska also have very skewed numbers favoring the power of those populations in voting power. The figures I'm using come from https://www.fairvote.org/population_vs_electoral_votes and are based on 2008 populations. New York have rates 51st in per vote power. California rates 49th per voter power. So as you can see, the range varies wildly in how much power your vote actually has based on where you live. Now I understand that the current system tries to give each state equal representation, yet, how far can we go to maximize the power of one citizens vote only to devalue the power of another citizens vote? I'm not sure as to the answer to this question yet I do find the current system far too skewed to be considered fair.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337 |
Hard to imagine that people in OHIO want to diminish their voices. Is it only because your candidate lost? Trump won 37 states, Hill won 13. Liberals want to make this the United States of California. Yet the power of a voter in California ranks 51st in the country.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253 Likes: 16
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253 Likes: 16 |
It has worked for X amount of years. It was ok until the spoiled left lost and started crying.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26 |
Yeah that does not seem fair. There isn't a great answer on one hand the votes count less in more populated, more homogeneous states. On the other you'd be neutering the other 50 states which just off the top of my mind would likely not help the country and lets be honest with ourselves would likely lead to political, interstate violence if not war.
I think Trump took advantage of this and that's why Dems want it gone, in part due to their derangement about the man and in part that yeah it sucks for them. I don't like that someone can take advantage like that, but it wasn't exactly a secret either, Hilary didn't need to call people deplorable. She could have just as easily kept her mouth shut and campaigned in those states.
I am absolutely spit balling here but being an Ohioan I absolutely do not want New York and California being the only political lobbying grounds.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337 |
It has worked for X amount of years. It was ok until the spoiled left lost and started crying. Yet you seem to think that it's fine for a state to have over three times the voting power per person than average. You mean it works for you?
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26 |
The first thing I learned in the work force was that "that's how we always have done it" was the wrong approach.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337 |
Well I wasn't considering the last presidential election into all of that. I didn't think either party ran a candidate worthy of the office of president. I stand by that to this day.
But it's the second time it's happened. Gore lost the same way.
And I'm not saying every state should be identical in population by electoral college vote. But they should be much closer. When margins can reach 2.5 to 1 and over 3 to 1 advantage depending on where you live, something is way out of whack.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815 |
It has worked for X amount of years. It was ok until the spoiled left lost and started crying. It's why they have been importing illegals and driving out the middle class like in New York and California. They are trying to give Illegals the right to vote in local elections in places in California.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337 |
Another Trump lie being spread by our usual troll.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,864 Likes: 26 |
I think it's somewhere in-between. Importing? No, but they at least have a passive understanding that if these people get in and are able to vote the majority of them will probably vote democrat. I can't see them being dumb enough to not understand that as a very real possibility if not full on probable.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,815 |
Another Trump lie being spread by our usual troll. Why are you a TROLL? Why do you consider yourself a TROLL?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,659 Likes: 673
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,659 Likes: 673 |
Hard to imagine that people in OHIO want to diminish their voices. Is it only because your candidate lost? We all live in the US under the same government. Every vote should count equally. If your politics are truly mainstream then you have nothing to worry about by this happening. I remember when California was a great Republican state that produced the likes of Reagan. BUT those republicans would be far left today. I have no issue with majority rule.
Last edited by OldColdDawg; 01/04/19 04:00 PM.
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337 |
And on the flip side the GOP loves the cheap labor they garner from illegals. People act as though this is a one sided issue when business loves illegals as much as democrats do.
Let's face it, Reagan gave amnesty to millions of illegals and Obama deported more of them than any other president. The right loves to force feed the message that it's the Dems who want their votes, but history dictates it's not a Dem vs GOP issue.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753 Likes: 11
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753 Likes: 11 |
All they have to do is get the Senate to agree and the President to sign it. Baw Haw BahHawhahahahahahahahaha snort Constitutional Amendments don't require presidential signature. They require 2/3 of the House & Senate approve of the proposal and send it to the states for a vote. Then 3/4 of the states to ratify. (but you made your point) Speaking of constitutional amendments, Sen. Ted Cruz and Rep. Francis Rooney proposed a Constitutional amendment to impose term limits on members of both houses of Congress. https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/04/politics/term-limits-ted-cruz-proposal/index.html
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337 |
But his proposal was a bit odd I thought. He proposed two terms each for both the congress and senate. That would give senators a much longer time in power than the congress. But then again, he's a senator.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753 Likes: 11
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753 Likes: 11 |
I don't know what the right answer would be... 3&2, 2&2, but it nice the conversation is starting.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204
~ Legend
|
~ Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 18,204 |
4 and 2. Give em 12 years each. We don't need to see the efficiency of the two party system streamline their political talent into a presidential pipeline. The problem with Congress is that it's essentially 1 year of work and 1 year of campaigning for their chair. That's why the most powerful Congressmen are just the biggest funders of the party.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,672 Likes: 1337 |
I agree that the term limits should add up to equal time.
But I have to give old Ted kudos here. It's high time there were some serious conversations about it.
I don't see where the people in congress and the senate would have any actual incentive to help undermine their own political power, but the conversation has to start somewhere.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,625 Likes: 590
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,625 Likes: 590 |
All they have to do is get the Senate to agree and the President to sign it. Baw Haw BahHawhahahahahahahahaha snort And you think that's funny..... geez C'mon - that was funny!
The more things change the more they stay the same.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,067 Likes: 126
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,067 Likes: 126 |
The purpose of the EC is to prevent large states from overpowering the smaller states. If we get rid of the EC, the campaign trail would consist of New York, Florida, Texas and California and to hell with the rest of the country. Fair? Hardly. Then again, liberals have a messed up definition of fair when they think a 70% tax rate is fair.
It's supposed to be hard! If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,659 Likes: 673
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,659 Likes: 673 |
The purpose of the EC is to prevent large states from overpowering the smaller states. If we get rid of the EC, the campaign trail would consist of New York, Florida, Texas and California and to hell with the rest of the country. Fair? Hardly. Then again, liberals have a messed up definition of fair when they think a 70% tax rate is fair. So your definition of fair is that because you live in BFE that your one vote should be equivalent to 10s or 100s of people that live in big cities? Fair? Hardly. Then again, GOPers are so full of themselves they never see other people.
Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 9
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 9 |
If you go to a pure population vote then many small states no longer have a reason to stay a part of a united states because they will have no voice. Right now politicians have to go and earn the votes. IF you change it to a popular vote half the states won't even matter anymore and the only thing politicians will do is go to a few big cities and ignore the rest of America.
Thats OK let all your food get grown by corporations and be laced with GMO and other toxic qualities. Watch how fast regular farmers stop growing food when you tell them their voice doesn't matter anymore.
The house of representatives is where the popular voice is heard. The senate where all states are equal. The electoral college is the only fair way for ALL states of have a fair shot at having a voice on who is the President.
This nonsense goes through and chances are it rips the country apart as the smaller population states decide it's not worth being controlled without a voice.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 9
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 4,990 Likes: 9 |
But his proposal was a bit odd I thought. He proposed two terms each for both the congress and senate. That would give senators a much longer time in power than the congress. But then again, he's a senator. I'm fine with term limits to limit the number of lifetime politicians. Then again only being run by newbies and having no senior statesmen could be bad too. Perhaps 4 terms of congress and 2 of the senate.
You can't fix stupid but you can destroy ignorance. When you destroy ignorance you remove the justifications for evil. If you want to destroy evil then educate our people. Hate is a tool of the stupid to deal with what they can't understand.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,322 Likes: 79
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,322 Likes: 79 |
Wah Wah Wah, democrat, democrat, democrat. I don't understand the electoral college or what it was meant to do, Whah!
The electoral college will be here for a very long time to come because its the way the founders intended. Anyone who disagrees with the general principles of the electoral college doesn't understand why it was invented.
It does its intended job every single presidential election and it performs well. Its a true indicator for what the combined states in the US want or vote for across the geographic regions.
Find what you love and let it kill you.
-Charles Bukowski
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,902 Likes: 113
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,902 Likes: 113 |
No way won’t ever happen. The GOP would never win another election and they all know it.
A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives. – Jackie Robinson
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN) introduces
bill to eliminate electoral
college
|
|