DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Buttigieg campaign roasted for adding applause to CNN town hall clips

You’re just doing what 40 said you would, changing the subject. To an irrelevant point. I have already said why it is irrelevant. You are being intellectually dishonest

The way you worship Bernie, it seems like a religion.

Sorry that facts bore you. It is a fact that your question is irrelevant, because whether or not a person is a Christian does not impede their ability to govern constitutionally.

Simple truths are boring but necessary

What this fellow does not understand is that no one is forcing religion on anyone. It’s a red herring in that he is arguing against something that is not happening. It’s rather funny

And the left was to marginalize everyone who disagrees with them to consolidate power, so in a sense, the leftist desire “god status”

You’re a one man spam machine. You’ll be our fastest Legend.... without changing subjects.
dagesh? Try dogma.


This board has become unreadable.

If all Stop replying to me, I’ll stop posting. If people keep posting red herrings, strawmen, ad hominem, misinformation, non sequiturs, etc. I’ll keep replying.

TRUTH.

Its not like u two little angels had anything to with that .... ...

U left out the picture of the pig putting lipstick on .... putting the word democratic in front of the word socialism is exactly that .... putting lipstick on a pig ....

Well said

Matthew_7:6

j/c

Ocdius 2:12

Shut thine pie hole and give unto Pete's thread only that which is about Pete or relevant but not religious. Sermons shall be served in church on Sunday.

Oops. OCD opened the door for me...if he hadn’t made a statement more appropriate for North Korea then US, I would have stayed out. I said no more fallacies if you want me to stop posting. Otherwise I will keep coming back

Sorry, your request is unconstitutional. If you want that kind of rule, move to another country. I believe in the First Ammendment

Now how does Sanders relate to Pete? Maybe Pete, unlike Sanders, knows the difference between a theological mandate and a political one

Sanders objected to a theological mandate on political grounds. Not sharp

One can obey both the Bible and the constitution Or did he and you not know that?

Deleted

No. But they're not here on this board spouting that BS are they?

I'll tell you what. You go learn about the resurrections, what they're for and how people will still have the opportunity to accept Christ when this life is over and get back to me rather than try to make it sound like a single passage tells the story.

A Christian who calls Jesus’ claims that those who do not believe in Him are condemned ( (John 3:18) b.s. Oh, nice

What you are claiming is not in the Bible, Sounds like “Shepherd’s Chapel”. I have read the Bible cover to cover many times, and it’s not there.

If you want to provide scriptures that you think teach that, we can discuss.

Make a new thread if you think you can back up what you’re saying. We don’t have to discuss it here. Maybe you can teach me something.

You sound like a Universalist.

You obviously do not have a clue. This isn't a bible study class or I would teach you. But then you can't teach anyone unwilling to learn.

This is a topic about Buttigieg.

I suppose you believe that the moment you die you go to heaven or hell too and that the resurrections the Bible teaches us about do not exist. It's all the rage from you people who condemn everyone who do not believe as you do.

Are you a Mormon, Pitdawg? Just curious.

No, but I need to quit responding to one.

Lol, if you think I’m a Mormon, you don’t know what Mormons are.

Go ahead and PM me verses that say people get saved after they die if you want. If you can prove it biblically, I will admit publically that I was wrong and Vaught’s words were unscriptural.

Can you show?

Lol. Well there you have it. Like politicians and their families, it’s open season in DT.

It makes no difference to me if hes a Mormon or a theologically liberal Christian. Just curious. I’m not going to attack him for being Mormon. I’ve had friends who were Mormons. We disagreed strongly with each other, but we were friendly

He's referring to a fairly well-accepted and common sense board guideline of staying on topic.

Good spin. Please elaborate more.

That part I can accept. But read again. He also said no religion and religion should not be public. Unconstitutional. Anyways, what I said relates to Pete, because he, unlike Sanders knows the difference between a theological mandate and a constitutional mandate

Pete does not seem to conflate theological mandates and constitutional mandates like other certain liberal leftists. That is a positive

Nothing to elaborate.

Asking someone their particular belief is not an attack. Not open season.

The words 'no' and 'religion' were next to each other, but that's not what it means. The way I read it is that the topic is about Mayor Pete, not sermons. The New Thread button is there for all.

So you disagree strongly with the Mormon religion or you strongly disagree with a guy because he’s a Mormon? Just trying to drill down on this a bit here.

Pete doesn’t seem to conflate a persons theological mandate and their constitutional mandate like certain others. Thats a positive attribute for him. In other words, he’s not going to assume that ones faith is going to cause them to be unable to obey the Constitution

At least I hope at least one Dem knows that

Climb down of your cross there noob, we don't really care.

Same thing. There’s no difference. If you disagree with something, you will disagree with the one who holds it. And it’s not a bad thing to disagree on any mattet

I’m not liberal, so my point is not to cry victim. And you need to honor the first ammendment

I bet Pete knows that it is silly to conflate another persons theological mandate with their constitutional mandate. Do you think so too

You don’t care about the difference between a Christian leaders theological mandate and their constitutional mandate? So you don’t understand that they are seperate and non conflicting?

Wow.

Pete is a professing Christian, so according to people’s view of seperation of church and state, he should not run.

When and if he tries to force his religious beliefs into public policy it will be an issue. He hasn't done that. Besides he is gay. I mean doesn't that mean unless he repents for that he is doomed to hell according to your beliefs? I mean what about Sodom and Gomorrah?