“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
The Pocahontas issue is still dragging her down a bit.
There some other issues but....we can’t be about identity politics then support someone who ran with a Native American heritage. So liberals are hesitant.
Thanks for answering.
Personally, that means crap to me. I am not getting on you. I just don't agree w/the Dems philosophy. I think she is by far the best candidate that most of America could get behind.
This is not an attack on Diam, but he and I were talking about Warren a year or two ago and I was saying how I liked her and he brought up the Native American thing and I actually started laughing. I don't even see how it is an issue. Who freaking cares?
I care about the well-being of our country. And she is our best bet in my humble opinion.
It’s about credibility. Liberals constantly bring up identity politics, from race and discrimination and such.
So what does it look like to conservatives that liberals would constantly bring it up, then turn around and support someone who took advantage and lied about her identity to get ahead?
Trump and his supporters would be on full attack mode. Look I want warren. She’s my top choice. But she has her own polarizing issues just like Bernie.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Sadly Bloomberg is having a better showing tonight.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
If he comes in 2nd in SC, he will be in a very good position going into Super Tuesday. He doesn’t need to win SC, just not bomb.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
I hope everyone on this board understand that the vast majority of black Americans view reparations as undoable and a pipe dream. So please don’t think we just want handouts.
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
Bruh they started the music while Biden was talking lmfao
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”
It’s about credibility. Liberals constantly bring up identity politics, from race and discrimination and such.
So what does it look like to conservatives that liberals would constantly bring it up, then turn around and support someone who took advantage and lied about her identity to get ahead?
Trump and his supporters would be on full attack mode. Look I want warren. She’s my top choice. But she has her own polarizing issues just like Bernie.
Yeah, I get that bro. However, I could give a rat's ass about BS like that. My bottom line is what is best for my country and for my family.
So, she messed up..............but, she's our best bet for productivity. That is what is important to folks like me, bro. We could care less about the "OMG" and the "he said, she said" crowd.
I mean seriously... I feel like I'm in the middle.. I typically vote republican but if we could get a viable decomratic candidate that's a moderate I could vote for them.... most of These fools I can't vote for...
I mean seriously... I feel like I'm in the middle.. I typically vote republican but if we could get a viable decomratic candidate that's a moderate I could vote for them.... most of These fools I can't vote for...
Exactly. I'm a libertarian and and I voted Trump in 2016. At this point I'm 99% sure I'm going to do it again.
Its not because I'm married to Trump or anything either. He just represents the cross platform of my values better than any candidate the Democrats can field. less government interference, America first, strong military, strong foreign policy, free market, pro 2nd amendment, etc.
If the Democrats had a viable moderate candidate I'd consider voting for that person. This is in all seriousness. Why can't they field someone like Bill Clinton or JFK? Where did those types of values go?
The closest thing they have to a real candidate is mayor Pete, that's just my opinion.
