Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#1802659 10/07/20 01:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
I don't have a very good feel about this game because I haven't watched much of any of Indy's games. Thus, I don't feel as confident about some of the matchups as normal. But, I like these kind of threads and figured I would get the discussion started.

When the Browns have the ball: The Colts D has been very good, especially against the run. They should provide a true test for our magnificent run game. I think they have came up w/some turnovers and even have a pick 6 or two. It should be noted that they haven't played a good offense yet. Gardner Minshew lit them up late in the game and gave Indy their only loss. I do think that we are going to have to contain their DL as Buckner and Houston are playing very well. Baker will need to take care of the ball again. I do think we can exploit Rhodes w/double moves. He is a very aggressive player and really struggled his last two years in Minnesota. He's physical, but is prone to give up the big play. I could see OBJ putting a double move on Rhodes and blowing by him for an easy TD.

When Indy has the ball: I think the Colts have a good OL, but if the Browns can pressure Rivers, he will turn it over. He is not the same qb that he was 3-4 years ago. His game has really digressed. He has thrown a lot of picks in the last couple of years and gets shook when rushed hard. Taylor and Himes might be able to run on us and catch short passes. Watch out for their TEs.

I think the Colts are facing some injury issues. Hooker was lost for the year and key players like Okereke, Constanzo, and Leonard are questionable. Guys like Mack, Pittman, and Campbell are out.

The Colts are favored by 2.5. I don't really get that line. I think the Browns should win this game outright.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,495
Likes: 1281
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,495
Likes: 1281

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,231
Likes: 591
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,231
Likes: 591
Have they totally turned over their Oline since Luck retired? I mean, it was their awful Oline that broke him, but all of a sudden their Oline is a strength? Honest question, as I don't know.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,685
Likes: 1337
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,685
Likes: 1337
I still say that if you look at the opponents the Colts have played, that force may not be as powerful as it's showing to be on paper right now. The great Gardner Minshew posted 27 points against them. Their other opponents aren't known for a high powered offense.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,533
Likes: 499
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,533
Likes: 499
We are Juggernaut!!! They cannot stop us.


No Craps Given
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,495
Likes: 1281
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,495
Likes: 1281
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
The Colts are favored by 2.5. I don't really get that line. I think the Browns should win this game outright.


Vegas knows bettors still don't trust the Browns.

I took the Browns on the ML.

Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 89
A
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
A
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 89
[/quote]

Vegas knows bettors still don't trust the Browns.

[/quote]


This.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 1835
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 1835
Originally Posted By: Milk Man
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
The Colts are favored by 2.5. I don't really get that line. I think the Browns should win this game outright.


Vegas knows bettors still don't trust the Browns.

I took the Browns on the ML.

Actually, the line would swing the other way if that were true - to try to get betters to play the Browns. wink


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,639
Likes: 510
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,639
Likes: 510
If that line holds, I’ll probably go Colts w/the under. I think it’s gonna be a hard game to win ... for both teams


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 396
R
Legend
Offline
Legend
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 396
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
If that line holds, I’ll probably go Colts w/the under. I think it’s gonna be a hard game to win ... for both teams


Will you at any point have confidence in the Browns, ever?

Browns should win this game going away.

Milk is right about bettors. Last year bettors got burned by the Browns for the last time. This is a party they will happily be late to, not early.

People also keep forgetting that while handicappers are really good, the lines are developed to create equal action on both sides. They don't set the lines at the Colts -2.5 because they think the Colts are the better team. They set the line at -2.5 because they believe an equal number of people will bet the Colts and the Browns at that line. A huge part of his week's line is people are not going to believe in the Browns until they do it over a long haul. And most smart fans know there is a possibility Baker will need to win this and bettors need to see that as well.

I personally think Indy's D is overrated and the Browns could win this pretty handily.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,828
Likes: 274
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,828
Likes: 274
This really doesn’t belong here -sorry, vers - but I’ve been wondering: if we win we’re 4-1. When’s the last time we were 4-1?

I tried to research it (honest!) but couldn’t find the answer.

Late 80s?


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

2023: The year we got a legit D.
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 396
R
Legend
Offline
Legend
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 396
You'll find out on Monday when we are the talk of the all the sports talk shows. thumbsup

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,231
Likes: 591
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,231
Likes: 591
Originally Posted By: Rishuz
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
If that line holds, I’ll probably go Colts w/the under. I think it’s gonna be a hard game to win ... for both teams


Will you at any point have confidence in the Browns, ever?


Probably not... and I'm only half-joking. :-p


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,533
Likes: 499
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,533
Likes: 499
Originally Posted By: Rishuz
Originally Posted By: Dawgs4Life
If that line holds, I’ll probably go Colts w/the under. I think it’s gonna be a hard game to win ... for both teams


Will you at any point have confidence in the Browns, ever?

Browns should win this game going away.

Milk is right about bettors. Last year bettors got burned by the Browns for the last time. This is a party they will happily be late to, not early.

People also keep forgetting that while handicappers are really good, the lines are developed to create equal action on both sides. They don't set the lines at the Colts -2.5 because they think the Colts are the better team. They set the line at -2.5 because they believe an equal number of people will bet the Colts and the Browns at that line. A huge part of his week's line is people are not going to believe in the Browns until they do it over a long haul. And most smart fans know there is a possibility Baker will need to win this and bettors need to see that as well.

I personally think Indy's D is overrated and the Browns could win this pretty handily.


What is the best way/app to bet on the games?


No Craps Given
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 396
R
Legend
Offline
Legend
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 396
Milk could better answer that.

I use in state casino apps here that are tied to the books here in Nevada. I'm not familiar with out of state betting apps.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 1835
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 1835
Originally Posted By: lampdogg
This really doesn’t belong here -sorry, vers - but I’ve been wondering: if we win we’re 4-1. When’s the last time we were 4-1?

I tried to research it (honest!) but couldn’t find the answer.

Late 80s?

1994... We actually started 6-1. We finished 11-5. I was at the Wild Card game when we defeated the Patriots 20-13. We were all so excited because we knew there was no way in hell the Steelers could beat us three times in one year. We were wrong, they beat us the next week in Pittsburgh - by 20 points.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle/1994.htm


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 1835
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 1835
Originally Posted By: FATE
Originally Posted By: Milk Man
Originally Posted By: Versatile Dog
The Colts are favored by 2.5. I don't really get that line. I think the Browns should win this game outright.


Vegas knows bettors still don't trust the Browns.

I took the Browns on the ML.

Actually, the line would swing the other way if that were true - to try to get betters to play the Browns. wink


Messed this up. Thought I read that the Colts were getting 2.5 until I read Rish's post above. My bad, Milk.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,828
Likes: 274
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 12,828
Likes: 274
Thanks, Fate. I thought of ‘94 but didn’t think we were 6-1 after seven games


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

2023: The year we got a legit D.
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Likes: 3
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Likes: 3
Originally Posted By: oobernoober
Have they totally turned over their Oline since Luck retired? I mean, it was their awful Oline that broke him, but all of a sudden their Oline is a strength? Honest question, as I don't know.
The linchpin of the Colts OL is LG Quentin Nelson. The Colts drafted him in 2018 with the #6 overall pick. While other teams were drafting Mayfield, Barkley, Darnold, Ward, B Chubb, the Colts drafted a GUARD. And so far, that was the best pick of that draft, at least the top 10. From this article,

"At left guard, Quenton Nelson is among the best guards in the league and is already making his mark as one of the top overall players in the NFL after two outstanding seasons to start his career. Nelson had the No. 2 run-blocking grade and the No. 7 pass-blocking grade in 2019, as his combination of power, quickness and technique have him on a Hall-of-Fame path despite entering just his third NFL season."

Now that may be hyperbole, but there is little doubt that, to date, Nelson is the heart and soul of one of the best OL in the game. (LT Castonzo was a 1st rd pick in 2011, and C Kelly was a 1st rd pick in 2016.)

Last edited by W84NxtYrAgain; 10/07/20 05:46 PM.

1. #GMstrong
2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb
3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa
4. ClemenZa #1
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 79
1
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
1
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 79
Originally Posted By: Milk Man


Immovable object meet unstoppable object




"Team Chemistry No Match for Team Biology" (Onion Sports Headline)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 1019
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 1019

Although home field is not the advantage as normal home games. It is still home in your own bed.

The Colts are not an easy evaluation. When looking at their offensive roster; They don't seem scary. I respect the veteran Rivers but he is slipping.

On paper they have the defensive stats. But the competition is suspect.

In the end we have more play makers on both sides of the ball.

There are no gimme games in the NFL. No matter who you play the goal is to execute and not shoot yourself.

If we can continue to play as we have the last 3 games. We should win.

Offense: Stay the course. Feature the run with motion. Let the horses plow. Strike with the pass when the play is there. Don't force throw. Use the whole field and all receivers.

Hunt should carry the load. I expect him to have a big game.

Baker needs to build on what he has been doing. Let the game come to him.


Defense: All about constant pressure on Rivers. He does not move well but has a quick release. His game is all about timing. Make him move. Play physical on their receivers. Jam them. Disrupt their timing. Hilton is their go too. Try to take him away with Ward.

When you win the turnover game it increases you odds to win big time.

I think we will be 4-1. Setting up The Showdown.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,625
Likes: 590
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,625
Likes: 590
Who is the Colts RT? Maybe the game will come down to a great play by Garret? Just a thought that popped into my head when I read your post. I had this game pegged as winnable pre-season. Our offense has been better than expected - no kidding huh? Anyone figure we'd pop 49 points up on the board versus Dallas - The D has been even worse than I thought with the exception of popping big, game changing plays.

We're probably going to need Baker to be accurate and turnover free. We'll need low penalty totals. And no misses from Parkey if we struggle to get it into the end zone.


The more things change the more they stay the same.
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Likes: 3
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,101
Likes: 3
Yeah, just looked him up, Mike Glowinski; drafted by SEA in '15. Started '17 at RT, but lost the job and was waived after the season. Colts picked him up and he got the starting job via injury.

I agree, he looks like a weak link.


1. #GMstrong
2. "I'm just trying to be the best Nick I can be." ~ Nick Chubb
3. Forgive me Elf, I didn’t have faith. ~ Tulsa
4. ClemenZa #1
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,733
Likes: 619
D
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,733
Likes: 619
I think Baker will have to be counted on more to win this game. I think he's a much bigger factor this week than he has been the last 3.


Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Originally Posted By: GratefulDawg


I am a fan of using pre-snap motion. I think using it helps Baker. I'll tell you why. When you bring a guy in motion, the defender lined-up over that player will do one of a few things. To keep it simple, if the defender follows the motion man across the formation, you know that they are in man. If he does not follow, that tells you they are in some sort of zone at least one side of the field. You can tell other things by how the guy either drops or stays close to the LOS. I brought this up when Throw asked me about one of Baker's picks earlier this year. The guy who picked it did not follow the motion man across the formation, thus making it a rather easy read.

Anyway...………...I think it is a good idea for Stefanski to use a lot of motion. It should help make things a bit easier for Baker.

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 32
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 32
I'll especially enjoy this game because my son played against Rivers in high school. I wondered why that "lineman" was throwing to receivers in the pre-game, lol

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,533
Likes: 499
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,533
Likes: 499
jc

This team has been very disciplined. I hope we continue the trend this weekend. Go Browns!


No Craps Given
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 396
R
Legend
Offline
Legend
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 396
jc -

Just watched the most recent Building the Browns.

I'm drinking the kool-aid. I think we are witnessing something special being built here.

Bet the Browns big on Sunday.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,320
Likes: 248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,320
Likes: 248
I’m drinking it as well. Of course I would since I’m a glass half full kind of guy.


#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 1835
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 1835
Originally Posted By: Pdawg
I’m drinking it as well. Of course I would since I’m a glass half full kind of guy.

Can't drink the whole glass of orange kool-aid? Slacker.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
Originally Posted By: FATE
Originally Posted By: lampdogg
This really doesn’t belong here -sorry, vers - but I’ve been wondering: if we win we’re 4-1. When’s the last time we were 4-1?

I tried to research it (honest!) but couldn’t find the answer.

Late 80s?

1994... We actually started 6-1. We finished 11-5. I was at the Wild Card game when we defeated the Patriots 20-13. We were all so excited because we knew there was no way in hell the Steelers could beat us three times in one year. We were wrong, they beat us the next week in Pittsburgh - by 20 points.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle/1994.htm



Good Grief golly golly gee!!! You think, I'd chose such a STUPID SCREEN NAME for 25 years, and it stuck,
In those ^3 steeler losses, the closest chance the Browns had to win was the earliest season matchup, and the best momentum came from Throwing deep on their secondary,
With those 3 games in mind, I came up with this screen name to see how this board works, in 1995-98ish,

and later decided It'll keep the point, to not change my screen name.

^^^ Those 3 Steeler losses in 1994, are the reason I use this screen name, as a reminder, they needed a reminder in the playoff loss.

"It's your whole dang reason to etre isn't it."


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,661
Likes: 40
S
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
S
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,661
Likes: 40
The colts not only have the top rated defensive line in the nfl but also tge top rated offensive line in the NFL. The bears have a very good pass rush and only managed one sack. So far they have only surrendered 4 sacks. Also, thier secondary is ranked the best in the NFL. This ons is going to be tough, really tough.

Colts-27

Browns-13


" Now here you are running these dirty old streets tattoo on your neck fake gold on your teeth, got the hood here snowed but you can't fool me, we both know who you are"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,550
Likes: 814
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,550
Likes: 814
Originally Posted By: Rishuz
jc -

Just watched the most recent Building the Browns.

I'm drinking the kool-aid. I think we are witnessing something special being built here.

Bet the Browns big on Sunday.


A good rule to follow when betting; Don't bet more than $20 on your team in a straight up line bet. Go with the over under if you feel the need..


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Likes: 147
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Likes: 147

Ind (20) Vs Jax (27)
Jax Rushed 23 times For 91 yds (3.95) (5 for 19 by Minshew)
14 of those including 3 for 19 by Minshew were in the 1st half.
Jax down by 3 at the half, tied end of 3rd


Min (11) vs Ind (28)
Min rushed 18 times for 80 yds (4.44)
10 for 43 1st half
Min Down by 12 at the half and 15 at end of 3rd qtr

NYJ (7) vs Ind (36)
NYJ rushed 29 times for 109 yds (3.75) (5 for 20 by Darnold)
17 for 69 1st half (3 for 10 by Darnold)
NYJ Down by 10 at the half, 24 end of 3rd

Ind (19) vs Chi (11)
Chi rushed 16 for 28yds (1.75) (2 for -1 by Foles)
11 for 17 1st half (2 for -1 by Foles)
Chi down 10 at the half, 13 end of 3rd, 16 with just under 4 min left

Seems their opponents are going away from the run in the second half, even Jax who was not behind or out of the game).

Aside from Chicago, seems teams have run decently on them, then gave up the run.


We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 15
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 15
Originally Posted By: GratefulDawg



Like all good breakdowns... Brett Kollman was ontop of this... this is a solid highlight


Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,495
Likes: 1281
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,495
Likes: 1281
j/c...


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,320
Likes: 248
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,320
Likes: 248


This might have something to do with KJ not getting reps.


#gmstrong
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
The Jets threw a pick 6 to the colts (Xavier) in the first quarter, and a pick 6 to (TJ Carrie) late in the 4th,

Jets may have given up, either way,

The Recipe hasn't changed, run the ball against the Colts Sunday.

OP, You mean the Browns are Home Dogs in the betting line?

Remember when that used to mean something.
brownie


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,235
Originally Posted By: TrooperDawg
I'll especially enjoy this game because my son played against Rivers in high school. I wondered why that "lineman" was throwing to receivers in the pre-game, lol


When he was in San Diego I played texas holdem with him. He just wanted to bluff everyone all night with 2 7 offsuit lol.


Cleveland Browns, Space Browns
[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
Page 1 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2020 NFL Season Looking Back: Browns 32 Colts 23 Colts at Browns Matchup.

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5