Tucker Carlson: Joe Biden Using Military to Fly Illegal Aliens to the U.S.
John Binder
15 Jul 2021
President Joe Biden’s administration is using the United States Armed Forces to help fly illegal aliens into the interior of the U.S., Fox News’s Tucker Carlson reveals.
On Wednesday evening, Carlson unveiled internal emails in which Lt. Col. Matthew Burrows informs military personnel that commercial planes at Laughlin Air Force Base, east of Del Rio, Texas, will board and fly illegal aliens into the U.S. interior.
Burrows, Carlson noted, asked personnel to keep the operation from becoming public.
“This show has confirmed that the Biden administration has enlisted the U.S. military, secretly, around our country,” Carlson said. That is happening at Laughlin Air Force Base in Texas. We know it’s happening there because a man called Lt. Col. Matthew Burrows sent his subordinates spelling it out very clearly.”
Burrows’ email reads, “Over the next few days, weeks, or months, you may see passenger aircraft on our ramp transporting undocumented non-citizens. Please review the attached public affairs guidance on the issue” [Emphasis added].
“Burrows’ email then instructed uniformed military personnel to hide what was happening on the base from the country they’re sworn to serve,” Carlson continued:
(Screenshot via Tucker Carlson Tonight)
Carlson said the Pentagon confirmed to him that the secretive operation is occurring under the guise of the Department of Homeland Security’s “mission.” The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency, though, refused to disclose where in the U.S. illegal aliens are being flown.
“ICE did not deny they were using Laughlin Air Force Base to relocate large numbers of foreign nationals into the interior of our country and do it secretly,” Carlson said. “The question is, where are all these people going? Several times, ICE promised us additional details. But in the end, we never heard back. Apparently, Americans do not have a right to know where foreign nationals are being resettled in their own country.”
“What you’re watching is demographic transformation in our country without our consent and in violation of our laws. That is happening,” Carlson continued.
For months, Breitbart News has chronicled the Biden administration’s expansive Catch and Release operation through which at least tens of thousands of illegal aliens are being briefly detained, put up in migrant hotels, then bused or flown into the U.S. interior with only the promise that they will show up to their asylum hearings months, or a year, later.
In June, Breitbart News reported that it is not only border crossing family units that are being resettled via the Catch and Release operation. The Biden administration is busing and flying single male adult border crossers into U.S. cities that remain undisclosed to American citizens.
The latest available data, from February 19 to April 22, reveals that the Biden administration has flown about 7,200 border-crossers into the U.S. interior on domestic commercial flights. Border crossers are allowed to bypass photo identification requirements, boarding flights without a photo ID, and do not have to prove they are negative for the Chinese coronavirus
And that's the only thing I remember her saying as well. Next time maybe try telling arch to do his own homework. He's really good at posting no facts and asking you to prove his point for him.
As for fish, he is posting Tucker. The guy who even FOX News claimed in court was for entertainment and you couldn't take what he says as factual.
Reasonable Viewers Don’t Look to Tucker Carlson for Facts, Fox Asserts
I don't know if we do the 'pinned messages' thing here on this board, but that link is as good a place as any to start.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
Both are very much the same on opposite sides of the spectrum.
The only real difference I see is people aren't posting what she says here in this forum trying to present it as news or facts.
Really? Maybe you suffer from "selective reading", it happens all the time.
Originally Posted By: OldColdDawg
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
All you have to do is look at the crime in the streets.
Defund the police my ass.
How Dems are turning the 'defund the police' mantra against the GOP
**EXCERPT**
In a written statement, Robyn Patterson, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) deputy communications director for, argued, "House Republicans voted against the funding their communities needed to keep police officers on the beat. If Republicans are looking for politicians who have voted to defund police departments, they only need to look in the mirror."
And you do realize that isn't something "Maddow said or asserted". It's an actual real quote in a written statement from, Robyn Patterson, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) deputy communications director put out.
In case you missed it, that has nothing to do with what we're talking about here. You seem to be trying to compare Tucker's ramblings to quotes from actual government officials.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
I see, so you try and compare the two, which I agreed with. Then you wish to dismiss the fact that one is quoted like gospel around here and the other one isn't.
I guess you missed that one is taken very seriously and used as a news source while the other one really isn't. So yes, that makes a lot of difference.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
I say this sincerely... you're just gonna have to break it down for me. Which one is which? IMO, depending on the poster, this could go any of 3 ways.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
Maddow is one of the liberal shills and Tucker is one of the right wing shills.
Now as I said, they are both shills and pretty much the same. But it's only obvious which set of shills get the most attention. All one has to do is look at the TV ratings to see that. But like I said, if you're not paying attention you wouldn't know that.......
Here Are the Top-Rated Cable News Shows for May 2021
According to live-plus-same-day data from Nielsen, Tucker Carlson Tonight is the No. 1 cable news show for May 2021, not just in average total audience, but also among adults 25-54.
Once again cable television’s top-rated host, Carlson hauled in an average of 2.9 million total viewers, and 478,000 adults 25-54 per original broadcast in May. In April, Carlson’s 8 p.m. show averaged 3 million total viewers and 523, 000 demo viewers. So, a month-to-month decline.
Hannity and The Five swapped spots in May, with Hannity finishing the month just +3,000 total viewers ahead of The Five. The latter out-performed the former in April among total viewers. MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show and The Ingraham Angle round out cable news’ top five for May. TRMS and Ingraham Angle also finished No. 4 and No. 5, respectively, the previous month.
Seven of the 10-most-watched shows of the month are Fox News shows. The other three were MSNBC shows.
In its second month on air, Fox News Channel’s Gutfeld! earned a spot in the cable news top 10 (total viewers), and beat its 11 p.m. competition.
Fox News Primetime was the only top 10 show to see growth in total viewers from the prior month (+1%).
CNN’s most-watched show for May was Cuomo Primetime (1.0 million). However, it was only the 22nd-most-watched show on all of cable news for the month. The top 21 (in total viewers) either aired on Fox News or MSNBC.
Here’s the top 10 for May 2021, as per live-plus-same-day data from Nielsen.
Fox News| 8 p.m. / Tucker Carlson Tonight: 2,937,000/ 24 telecasts Fox News | 9 p.m. / Hannity: 2,634,000 / 21 telecasts Fox News | 5 p.m. / The Five: 2,631,000 / 24 telecasts MSNBC | 9 p.m. / The Rachel Maddow Show / 23 telecasts Fox News | 10 p.m. / The Ingraham Angle: 2,055,000 / 23 telecasts Fox News | 6 p.m. / Special Report with Bret Baier: 1,833,000 / 24 telecasts MSNBC | 10 p.m. / Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell: 1,703,000 / 22 telecasts Fox News | 7 p.m. / Fox News Primetime: 1,607,000 / 24 telecasts Fox News | 11 p.m. / Gutfeld! : 1,474,000 / 23 telecasts MSNBC: | 8 p.m. / All In with
I'm aware who's more popular, but (IMO) that doesn't necessarily mean they're a trusted news source. Depending on who you talk to, one or both are considered not trustworthy. My understanding is that while Fox news does tend to pull in the ratings, they're equally as effective at turning other people off of their programming.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
i think the statement that one is taken as a news source and the other is dismissed is pretty valid. MSNBC anything is dismissed out of hand as a Communist media outlet by many/most ... while at the same time accepting and promoting Faux News as legit. the reality is they are pretty much equal and opposite.
interestingly only one is on record in a court of law stating that viewers should not believe any "facts" presented as being truthful. . . . hopefully those quotation marks aren't too smarmy.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
Last edited by oobernoober; 07/20/2102:04 PM. Reason: link should now be clickable
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
Hmm.... I thought both sources were similarly dismissed on here. For each Tucker Carlson video posted by fish, there are eyerolls from OCD, Pit, and others. I never got the idea that Fox News was given any credence by anyone that wasn't clearly within its most loyal base.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
They're certainly both very polarizing news sources. But what I find to be very odd is how so many times on this very board those on the right have bragged about how many people watch FOX News and how places like MSNBC's ratings suck. And as I believe you may be pointing out, only people who follow their political leanings watch and follow these news sources.
Therefore the amount of people who trust FOX News as their news sources vastly outnumber those of MSNBC. So the impact of each one varies quite a bit. I mean nobody sits and watches Hannity or Carlson for their comedic value. There's much more quality comedy on television. Thus the amount of people who take them seriously is obviously much greater when it pertains to FOX News.
So when they point out that people like Carlson are viewed at a much greater rate which means more people take him seriously, they mean it as a good thing. Yet when someone on the left points it out they try and act like it means nothing.
As I've said many times, it's not what people say, it's who's saying it.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
Hmm.... I thought both sources were similarly dismissed on here. For each Tucker Carlson video posted by fish, there are eyerolls from OCD, Pit, and others. I never got the idea that Fox News was given any credence by anyone that wasn't clearly within its most loyal base.
I agree with this. Which is why I try to use sources that are overall considered more neutral or local news sources from the area the story pertains to from which to post.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
The journalism.com and pew links I put in there are interesting in terms of the elements that go into what we're talking about. Left-leaning folks tend to spread their news sources out, while Right-leaning news sources tend to be much more concentrated. The way I see it, the conversation then turns into 'GOP only trusts GOP-aligned news sources, distrust others... and vice versa' unless you take a step back and look at it overall (the 2017 Marketwatch poll). Fox's ratings didn't seem to help them much in that poll.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
Probably because there are way more left leaning main stream media outlets. At least on television and print. The right has more on radio, but those pale compared to television and print because in general, those are only listened to while people are in their car driving around.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
To me, that's two sides of the same coin. I can't stand her bluster as much as Carlson's. She looked foolish when that medical ship came into harbor in NYC during COVID.
Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown
Charlie Kirk? lmao, your source is tainted with pure crap from a pro troll far right pinhead. And I'm not a fan of Stelter, never watch him on purpose, yett I didn't see anything worthy of that video IMHO. Maybe I'm not childish enough to get it, idk...
Biden says he’s ‘pushing to eliminate’ some handguns
JULY 22, 2021 LIZ GEORGE
President Joe Biden said Wednesday during a CNN town hall that he is “continuing to push to eliminate” 9mm handguns, in addition to rifles, that are able to fire multiple rounds.
“I’m the only guy that ever got — passed legislation when I was a senator to make sure we eliminated assault weapons,” the president said. “The idea you need a weapon that can have the ability to fire 20, 30, 40, 50, 120 shots from that weapon, whether it’s a, whether it’s a 9mm pistol or whether it’s a rifle, is ridiculous.”
“I’m continuing to push to eliminate the sale of those things, but I’m not likely to get that done in the near term,” Biden continued.
Biden claimed that crime rates are down, but gun violence and murder rates are up.
“So here’s what I’ve done. The people who in fact are using those weapons are acquiring them illegally. Illegally,” Biden said. “So what happens is: I’ve got an ATF – Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms – I have them increase their budget and increase their capacity, along with the Justice Department, to go after the gun shops that are not abiding by the law of doing background checks.”
Biden went on to attack “ghost guns,” which are homemade firearms that lack a traceable seal. He also said communities need “more policemen, not fewer policemen,” contradicting the “defund the police” movement which was widely endorsed by Democrat lawmakers.
“There’s also a thing called ghost guns that are being sold now and being used. And so but in addition to that, what we have to do is we have to deal with a larger problem of the whole issue of law enforcement generally, we’re in a situation where as much as we need to pass the Floyd Act and all that, but here’s the deal. Cops are having real trouble,” Biden said.
“They’re not all bad guys, there are a lot of good guys. We need more policemen, not fewer policemen. But we need them involved in community policing, community policing. And when we did that, violent crime went down, all the criticism about the original crime, but guess what, crime went down until we stopped doing community policing.”
“So it’s about getting, we have availability now, of over, billion, lots of money, for cops to be able to hire psychologists, psychiatrists, as well as social workers to be engaged in the process,” Biden concluded.
All it will take to fix the problems is more money. And those damn 9mm handguns. It's not the .22's, or the .25's, or the 38's, or the 40's, or the 45's.
There isn't a damn thing that can't be fixed by giving the government more money...........oh, wait.......they've been getting more money all the time. It's just, now, this time, it will work.
Mike Waltz bill would shut down Hunter Biden art career
A.G. Gancarski
July 28, 2021
PAINTER Act
The congressman questions Biden's artistic chops, buyer intent.
The art world has found a seemingly unlikely superstar of late in presidential son Hunter Biden, whose work commands up to $500,000 a piece.
But a new bill from a Republican Congressman could destroy the market for Biden’s work going forward.
The PAINTER Act, sponsored by U.S. Rep. Michael Waltz of Florida’s 6th Congressional District, stands for Preventing Anonymous Income by Necessitating Transparency of Executive Relatives. It would require the President and Vice President to provide financial disclosure information for non-dependent relatives, such as the fortysomething Biden scion.
Waltz is not known for his art criticism. Yet he questions why there would be a market for Biden’s work short of a seemingly exploitable familial connection to the White House. Buyers would be able to meet with Biden the younger, presenting a potential conflict.
“Under this administration, we have witnessed shameless attempts to profit off Joe Biden’s presidency that jeopardize the integrity of the White House,” said Rep. Waltz.
“Despite the Biden Administration’s silence on this issue, American citizens have a right to know who is attempting to purchase access to the White House through an ‘artist,’ Hunter Biden, with no established credentials to warrant such enormous profits. The PAINTER Act will put transparency first in the White House and shed light on the actions of the adult children of the President or Vice President that can be used to influence their parent’s position of power.”
Waltz, a frequent guest on Fox News, pushed the bill to them for a first look and included hot quotes for that audience.
“And that’s really what this is all about, is just getting some transparency and shining a light on this,” Waltz told Fox. “We should know who is backchanneling, backdooring and buying influence — which Hunter Biden has a long history of selling — to the President of the United States.”
Accusations of profiteering are nothing new for presidential families. Former President Donald Trump’s children faced scrutiny throughout his one term in office, and previous first families have had their own scandals in decades past.
Can you imagine the uproar we would see if Joe Biden Gave Hunter a job in the White House? That would be blatant nepotism. I mean he has zero experience in government. Oh, wait. Never mind.
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
Not to say that this 'Hunter Biden the artist' thing doesn't stink to high hell, but a right wing rag complaining about nepotism (all his kiddos in appointed positions despite poor qualifications and difficulty in getting security clearance) and profiting off the presidency (Mar A Lago?) is laughable.
There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.
In the story about school supplies the attendant on screen says a pack of crayons went from 50 cents to just under 3 dollars. IMO this is some of the legacy of the events of Nov. 3, 2020.
Biden's America. Higher prices. Higher at the pump, higher in the grocery store, higher in the department store. Less people working but landlords do not evict them.
What I would not do for a mean tweet, and cheaper gas or anything these days.
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples' money." Margarat Thatcher
Biden's America. Higher prices. Higher at the pump, higher in the grocery store, higher in the department store. Less people working but landlords do not evict them.
What I would not do for a mean tweet, and cheaper gas or anything these days.
Not only don't evict, can't evict. Now landlords are being forced by the Federal Government to run homeless shelters for free.
Quite a racket.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
You're right! They should kick all those dirtbags that got behind during the pandemic out to the curb and make sure those landlords get their 'hard earned' money... smh
I think the landlords should get paid by the people who caused the problem... Trump supporters. And no they didn't cause the pandemic, they just gave us an idiot to lead us through it.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/small-gator-chomp.gif)
