Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Pdawg #1879530 08/31/21 09:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Garrett Gilbert got cut. I wouldn’t be shocked if he ended up on our practice squad.

cfrs15 #1879532 08/31/21 09:49 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,514
Likes: 808
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,514
Likes: 808
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Garrett Gilbert got cut. I wouldn’t be shocked if he ended up on our practice squad.


Could be if Lulettea isn't brought back.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Ballpeen #1879535 08/31/21 09:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,351
Likes: 1350
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,351
Likes: 1350
Apparently, it has already been determined the Browns will not be bringing Lauletta back.


Tackles are tackles.
Ballpeen #1879536 08/31/21 09:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Originally Posted By: Ballpeen
Originally Posted By: cfrs15
Garrett Gilbert got cut. I wouldn’t be shocked if he ended up on our practice squad.


Could be if Lulettea isn't brought back.


Supposedly Lauletta is not coming back.

Baker_Dawg #1879539 08/31/21 09:53 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 825
Likes: 27
O
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
O
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 825
Likes: 27
They'll probably treat Delpit the same as they treated Ronnie Harrison last year and bring him along slowly.

Ballpeen #1879540 08/31/21 09:54 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,219
Likes: 590
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,219
Likes: 590
I'm surprised and/or doubtful about the report Lauletta isn't going to be brought back to the PS. IMO, you always have a development-type guy to work on at the QB spot.

Last edited by oobernoober; 08/31/21 09:54 AM. Reason: wording

There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,351
Likes: 1350
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,351
Likes: 1350
Originally Posted By: oobernoober
I'm surprised and/or doubtful about the report Lauletta isn't going to be brought back to the PS. IMO, you always have a development-type guy to work on at the QB spot.


This is where it is coming from. Not 100% set in stone, obviously.



Tackles are tackles.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,219
Likes: 590
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,219
Likes: 590
Yup. Opinions on her reporting aside, I'm surprised to hear this.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Pdawg #1879544 08/31/21 09:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 32
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 32
As of 10 am EST where does our roster number stand?

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Originally Posted By: oobernoober
I'm surprised and/or doubtful about the report Lauletta isn't going to be brought back to the PS. IMO, you always have a development-type guy to work on at the QB spot.


Lauletta is 26 so he is not the type of player you are describing. I would also guess we bring in someone younger to develop.

Baker_Dawg #1879552 08/31/21 10:37 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,412
Likes: 1006
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,412
Likes: 1006

Just my take on Delpit.

I think Woods sees him in a major role.

However, I think they will sprinkle him in on packages at first. Let him get settled in and comfortable in the scheme but more importantly just get used to playing again.

By game eight he will be a regular role player.


bonefish #1879557 08/31/21 11:00 AM
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 263
Likes: 26
B
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
B
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 263
Likes: 26
IMHO that would be a great scenario for the Browns. Maybe even better than him starting now...have a fresh difference maker injected mid-season.

Pdawg #1879559 08/31/21 11:16 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305
#Browns roster cuts so far:

- K. Lauletta
- S. Redwine
- C. Weaver
- J. Natson
- J. Franks
- T. Scales
- Marv Wilson
- K. Markway
- C. Malveaux
- P. Gustin
- J. Moffatt
-E. Benton
-B. Allen
-W. Harvey
-G.Senat(IR)
-C.Gossett
-J.Kelly
-E. Lee

Roster stands at 62, 9 more cuts.


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,514
Likes: 808
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,514
Likes: 808
Originally Posted By: MemphisBrownie
Apparently, it has already been determined the Browns will not be bringing Lauletta back.


I know there was speculation, but I don't know it is an official statement.

I agree we might want to go another direction, but there isn't anything that prevents our signing him if he clears waivers


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 79
1
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
1
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 79
The only slight surprises so far for me is maybe Redwine and Moffatt. Redwine was just so inconsistent. And though it’s not a surprise I really love how Kelly runs and would like to see him stashed on PS.

Last edited by 10YrOvernightSuccess; 08/31/21 11:27 AM.



"Team Chemistry No Match for Team Biology" (Onion Sports Headline)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,514
Likes: 808
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,514
Likes: 808
I doubt Kelly goes unclaimed. He is borderline starter for most teams.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Pdawg #1879564 08/31/21 11:40 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Pdawg #1879565 08/31/21 11:41 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Pdawg #1879566 08/31/21 11:49 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,478
Likes: 1281
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,478
Likes: 1281
Bummer on Hodge. I’ll miss the air guitar riff. Tough cuts mean our team is good now.

If he clears waivers, I wonder if they try and bring him back on the the PS.

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 32
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 32
Originally Posted By: GratefulDawg


Felton Factor

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,219
Likes: 590
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,219
Likes: 590
Kinda surprised BOTH Natson and Hodge were cut.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Pdawg #1879570 08/31/21 11:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 101
H
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
H
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 101
Davion Davis factor

Hammer #1879572 08/31/21 12:02 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,351
Likes: 1350
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,351
Likes: 1350
.

Last edited by MemphisBrownie; 08/31/21 12:04 PM. Reason: Moved to diff. thread

Tackles are tackles.
Milk Man #1879573 08/31/21 12:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Originally Posted By: Milk Man
Bummer on Hodge. I’ll miss the air guitar riff. Tough cuts mean our team is good now.

If he clears waivers, I wonder if they try and bring him back on the the PS.


I doubt he clears waivers but it if he does I would assume he’s a lock for our practice squad.

Pdawg #1879575 08/31/21 12:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,412
Likes: 1006
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,412
Likes: 1006
Odd.

So 5 receivers with Davis in limbo for two games.

Is Bradley still on the roster?

Last edited by bonefish; 08/31/21 12:10 PM.
Pdawg #1879577 08/31/21 12:10 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 29
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 29
JC...word has it, that Mack Wilson is on the trade block...I'm sure it would be for a late round pick.

bonefish #1879579 08/31/21 12:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 29
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 29
Originally Posted By: bonefish
Odd.

So 5 receivers with Davis in limbo for two games.

Is Bradley still on the roster?


yeah, I saw no news on him being cut...however it may come soon (I see him as a PS guy for us)

bonefish #1879580 08/31/21 12:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,953
Likes: 352
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,953
Likes: 352
I wonder if we might have an agreement with a player or 2 to bring them back after the team can put a couple of guys on IR?


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Originally Posted By: YTownBrownsFan
I wonder if we might have an agreement with a player or 2 to bring them back after the team can put a couple of guys on IR?


It doesn’t matter if someone claims them. I haven’t seen any vested veterans get cut yet so that means everyone has been on waivers.

Pdawg #1879582 08/31/21 12:13 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,870
Likes: 305


You know my love will Not Fade Away.........


#gmSTRONG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,351
Likes: 1350
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,351
Likes: 1350


And I believe any team that would claim him would take on that salary as well. Depending on where teams value him, he could not be picked up simply as a byproduct of his salary.


Tackles are tackles.
cfrs15 #1879585 08/31/21 12:18 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,953
Likes: 352
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,953
Likes: 352
Are players who were RFAs waived (and subject to claim) or cut? (and not subject to being claimed)


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
Originally Posted By: YTownBrownsFan
Are players who were RFAs waived (and subject to claim) or cut? (and not subject to being claimed)


I believe waivers.

Hammer #1879589 08/31/21 12:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,508
Likes: 176
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 22,508
Likes: 176
Originally Posted By: Hammer
Davion Davis factor


Yep, Davis was pretty hard to ignore in preseason.


Tomorrow is the most important thing in life. Comes into us at midnight very clean. It's perfect when it arrives and it puts itself in our hands. It hopes we've learned something from yesterday. -John Wayne
tru_dawgs #1879593 08/31/21 12:38 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,593
Likes: 238
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,593
Likes: 238
Originally Posted By: tru_dawgs
JC...word has it, that Mack Wilson is on the trade block...I'm sure it would be for a late round pick.


we turned down offers from KC multiple times


Blocking those who argue to argue, eliminates the argument.
leadtheway #1879595 08/31/21 12:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,219
Likes: 590
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,219
Likes: 590
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but Davion Davis (as well as McDowell) mostly or completely were playing against backups (at best) to guys that weren't going to make rosters. My understanding is that (generally) guys that are playing in the second halves of preseason games are definitely battling for roster spots, with odds being low.

So with that in mind, my questions are:

1. Why didn't the likes of McDowell and Davis get rewarded with earlier (higher-competition) reps as the preseason went on?

2. Hodge played with the starters in the final game (made a nice catch on a Baker pass, even), but didn't make the 53.... should we be reading anything into this?


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Likes: 501
My guess is that they knew they were going to cut Hodges and gave him time with the first team to get good tape out to other teams.

cfrs15 #1879597 08/31/21 12:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,294
Likes: 247
Pdawg Online OP
Legend
OP Online
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,294
Likes: 247


#gmstrong
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns cuts

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5