DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk The Smack Shack Steelers Suck!!!!!!!!

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

What the hell I thought you were banned....

---

Raider Pride can never die!!!



Oh, and SteelTheBest - I PMed you back, but it says that I haven't for some reason. Tell me if you get it.

---

Yes, I read you're full page of unadulterated BS. Like I said Faderboy, lets take it to another smack forum where I can point the guns of Navarone on you. Will be more than happy to school you in Real Smack at that time. You may even pick the forum as long as its liberal enough, and not politically correct.

After taking you apart at the emotional seams, I reserve the right to share the link with whomever I choose so everyone may have a good laugh. Wanna Play?
Well then, Just make room in you're sandbox for a time. Making short work of you should present no problems.

At any rate, let me say, you amaze me! I didn't think it was possible for one person to possess such a vast reservoir of undiluted gibberish! Does your train of thought have a caboose? Reading your post makes blindness a wonderful thing to look forward to.

To quote Thomas Brackett Reed: "They never open their mouths without subtracting from the sum of human knowledge.

BTW -- What's the Faders current record again? How about from 1970 to present?
In the past 20 yr's, what team has the better overall Record -- Faders or Steelers?
How many SB's for your Fav team again? That's what i thought. Seems like you have little room to talk smack. Just sayin

Let me know when you've picked out a forum ok.

Quote:

---

Well that's all fine and dandy.....but the stoolies still suck!!!!!!!!!

---

I agree, and I hope they continue to Suck. Especially this Sun.
You know, how they really sucked on opening day. LOL

How you doing OldSixty-Two?

Quote:

---

Rest assured, Steel, they suck more every day!

---

The way things are turning out, I'm hoping your right.

If it helps, let me get in on it. STEELERS SUCK! And don't forget to suck again this Sunday.

Quote:

---

lets take it to another smack forum where I can point the guns of Navarone on you. Will be more than happy to school you in Real Smack at that time. You may even pick the forum as long as its liberal enough, and not politically correct

---

Quote:

---

i can't believe that page hurt your feelings.

Quote:

---

lets take it to another smack forum where I can point the guns of Navarone on you. Will be more than happy to school you in Real Smack at that time. You may even pick the forum as long as its liberal enough, and not politically correct

---

see, right about HERE is where you fail. you are already in a smack forum, talking about how you'd REALLY be good at it if you were somewhere else.

that's a nice little fantasy you have believing that you're actually going to scare somebody with your pixels of text.

you sound more like a bengal fan to me than a steeler fan. next time just type in all caps and say WHO DEY over and over. im sure the real steeler fans won't miss you.

---

Next time Pal buy a Clue before opening mouth and inserting foot. Or, maybe know the circumstances first. That would be kinda nice.

BTW -- I never said or meant, how I'd "REALLY be good at it". You took it out of context. I meant, (now try to follow) in another smack forum with relaxed rules, I would be more able to more open up on him. Talking about Snacks here.

You are now dismissed. Unless that is, you like the taste of foot.

Another example of a failed educational system

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

What the hell I thought you were banned....

---

Raider Pride can never die!!!



Oh, and SteelTheBest - I PMed you back, but it says that I haven't for some reason. Tell me if you get it.

---

Yes, I read you're full page of unadulterated BS. Like I said Faderboy, lets take it to another smack forum where I can point the guns of Navarone on you. Will be more than happy to school you in Real Smack at that time. You may even pick the forum as long as its liberal enough, and not politically correct.

After taking you apart at the emotional seams, I reserve the right to share the link with whomever I choose so everyone may have a good laugh. Wanna Play?
Well then, Just make room in you're sandbox for a time. Making short work of you should present no problems.

At any rate, let me say, you amaze me! I didn't think it was possible for one person to possess such a vast reservoir of undiluted gibberish! Does your train of thought have a caboose? Reading your post makes blindness a wonderful thing to look forward to.

To quote Thomas Brackett Reed: "They never open their mouths without subtracting from the sum of human knowledge.

BTW -- What's the Faders current record again? How about from 1970 to present?
In the past 20 yr's, what team has the better overall Record -- Faders or Steelers?
How many SB's for your Fav team again? That's what i thought. Seems like you have little room to talk smack. Just sayin

Let me know when you've picked out a forum ok.

---

I was quite happy with my "page of unadulterated BS", but I guess you simply don't like my style of writing.
You call me "faderboy", which seems quite odd to me. Fader is defined as a device used to control sound volume. So...I am a boy that likes to...control sound?

Great smack (caught me quite off guard)

Take it to another forum? That is quite fine with me, but why can't we do it here? The rules? Are you that scared of getting banned for a short period of time (from a board that doesn't even support your own team) that you won't talk smack with me here?
Trust me when I say this. If you are really that good that you could "school" me "in real smack" - Then rules shouldn't be able to restrain greatness.

I don't really know what forum we should take this smack "battle" to. You see, I don't really have a habit of hanging around random forums that I could take a smack battle to if I need to. I visit this forum and one other, which doesn't seem to fit your oddly specific guidelines.

I don't need to take it to another forum to tear you apart at the "emotional seams". You see, I seemed to make you pretty emotional after you read my post about Ben Worthlisberger. But, once we do finish our battle, I would have no problem with you sending the links to anyone. I just don't think that you would like it when they laugh at your foolishness.

"Making short work of you should present no problems" - Is that what you thought about our PMs? Because I could post those too and see what people say about them. We could let them decide. Also, I'm just wondering why you never made a reply to my PM? is it because you couldn't come up with anything good to say? (these questions are tough - don't be pressured into answering them)

I have a large reservoir of "undiluted gibberish"? What do you call this: "Does your train of thought have a caboose?" (a quote from your post if you didn't notice). Who talks like that? That has to be the stupidest thing I have heard all week.

So - you look forward to blindness. I guess my jabs at the steelers (combined with a couple years of looking at Big Ben's face) are just too much for your little eyes.

You quote Thomas Brackett (Reed I presume). Since you feel the need to call on others quotes (other than mine or yours) to argue for you - I figure that I would also use another source.
Wikipedia says that he was ridiculed (not praised) and that people called him Czar Reed. It also says that he was unable to stop the Spanish-American War. It seems much like you. You are unable to stop the War that I have started with you (simply because your smack isn't good enough to end it - and I am too ruthless to let your "smack" go uncriticized). You are also ridiculed (much like Reed) because people are constantly calling you names such as "stooler".

Wow. You want to talk about our records from 1970 to present. You then ask over the past 20 years who has the better record. Last time I checked, 1970 to present is 37 years. I guess "20" is close enough for a steelers fan (I mean 17 isn't that far off).

Now you seem confused. You ask how many SB's my favorite team has won (the Raiders) - but in our PMs you seem fully convinced that I am not a raider fan. If we go with the Raiders then it is 3 (but that could be 20 or -14 for all you care). You have me in the SB category - but you never asked what the Raider's total record against the steelers is. Sources tell me that the Raiders lead the series 9-8 overall. Thats what I thought. It seems to me that you are the one with little room to talk. JUST SAYING.

If you still want to talk smack to me then I can't wait to see your response. Just don't give me any of the "I could talk better smack on another forum" crap. You can't. If that is the only way to finish this - then I guess I will appease you some day.

This is too much fun for me. I hope you can say the same. Now for some smilies:


SteelTheBest is StillTheWorst

Quote:

---

I agree, and I hope they continue to Suck.

---

Quote:

---

You really didn't refute, essentially anything that hooter said.

---

no, sadly, he didn't. i don't think he even knows what his point is. this is why i told him i thought he sounded like a bengal. those posts remind me of the tidal wave of buffoonery that came through the board (particularly the old one)the last couple years, since the bengals had their winning season.

the steelers and even ravens have a couple posters who come across as reasonable people who just had the misfortune of being in a bad situation. (rooting for pitt and balt. respectively.)

strangely, and i might be missing somebody, i don't recall ever meeting a bengal or reading a post from one who didn't come off as a tool. im sure they are out there somewhere.

hm, i just looked at the clock and it says the steelers still suck.
cheers!

Quote:

---

strangely, and i might be missing somebody, i don't recall ever meeting a bengal or reading a post from one who didn't come off as a tool.

---

Quote:

---

Earlier, I said "the Steelers don't suck", and I immediately began vomiting and a swarm of locusts invaded my house.

So, I think it's pretty clear that the Steelers do actually suck.

---

Quote:

---

I was quite happy with my "page of unadulterated BS", but I guess you simply don't like my style of writing.
You call me "faderboy", which seems quite odd to me. Fader is defined as a device used to control sound volume. So...I am a boy that likes to...control sound?

Great smack (caught me quite off guard)

Take it to another forum? That is quite fine with me, but why can't we do it here? The rules? Are you that scared of getting banned for a short period of time (from a board that doesn't even support your own team) that you won't talk smack with me here?
Trust me when I say this. If you are really that good that you could "school" me "in real smack" - Then rules shouldn't be able to restrain greatness.

I don't really know what forum we should take this smack "battle" to. You see, I don't really have a habit of hanging around random forums that I could take a smack battle to if I need to. I visit this forum and one other, which doesn't seem to fit your oddly specific guidelines.

I don't need to take it to another forum to tear you apart at the "emotional seams". You see, I seemed to make you pretty emotional after you read my post about Ben Worthlisberger. But, once we do finish our battle, I would have no problem with you sending the links to anyone. I just don't think that you would like it when they laugh at your foolishness.

"Making short work of you should present no problems" - Is that what you thought about our PMs? Because I could post those too and see what people say about them. We could let them decide. Also, I'm just wondering why you never made a reply to my PM? is it because you couldn't come up with anything good to say? (these questions are tough - don't be pressured into answering them)

I have a large reservoir of "undiluted gibberish"? What do you call this: "Does your train of thought have a caboose?" (a quote from your post if you didn't notice). Who talks like that? That has to be the stupidest thing I have heard all week.

So - you look forward to blindness. I guess my jabs at the steelers (combined with a couple years of looking at Big Ben's face) are just too much for your little eyes.

You quote Thomas Brackett (Reed I presume). Since you feel the need to call on others quotes (other than mine or yours) to argue for you - I figure that I would also use another source.
Wikipedia says that he was ridiculed (not praised) and that people called him Czar Reed. It also says that he was unable to stop the Spanish-American War. It seems much like you. You are unable to stop the War that I have started with you (simply because your smack isn't good enough to end it - and I am too ruthless to let your "smack" go uncriticized). You are also ridiculed (much like Reed) because people are constantly calling you names such as "stooler".

Wow. You want to talk about our records from 1970 to present. You then ask over the past 20 years who has the better record. Last time I checked, 1970 to present is 37 years. I guess "20" is close enough for a steelers fan (I mean 17 isn't that far off).

Now you seem confused. You ask how many SB's my favorite team has won (the Raiders) - but in our PMs you seem fully convinced that I am not a raider fan. If we go with the Raiders then it is 3 (but that could be 20 or -14 for all you care). You have me in the SB category - but you never asked what the Raider's total record against the steelers is. Sources tell me that the Raiders lead the series 9-8 overall. Thats what I thought. It seems to me that you are the one with little room to talk. JUST SAYING.

If you still want to talk smack to me then I can't wait to see your response. Just don't give me any of the "I could talk better smack on another forum" crap. You can't. If that is the only way to finish this - then I guess I will appease you some day.

This is too much fun for me. I hope you can say the same. Now for some smilies:


SteelTheBest is StillTheWorst

---

Well first off, after reading another long winded contribution from you, it became obvious to me, that I'm conversing with someone who's dealing with severe emotional problems, the least of which is not insecurity, along with a Need to feel important in a forum where no one really cares. You could have condensed this latest Novel reply of yours to 2, possibly 3 Medium sentences, but I see you're needs would not allow this.

The rest of you're reply screams of sheer desperation, but you're just gullible and naive enough to believe that it's not apparent to others.

You're writings indicate you probably suffer with psychotic episodes, plenty of them, and that's why its important meds are taken on a consistent basis? This way, when you reply, it just may cut the ramblings you seem to have an
affinity for in half. Seriously, no smack intended.

I asked if you would like to take this to another forum, where the rules of smack are much more relaxed simply because what I have to say and convey to you would not cross the somewhat stringent boundaries that have been in place here since day one. Asked you to pick the place and time, but I see your fear of being exposed supersedes all else. I understand.

Regards the Steelers Vs Raiders. Aside from the 9 - 8 advantage, tell me, what team inflicted more damage on the other when it really counted? I count 2 possibly 3 SB denials in the 70's alone, not to speak of the extreme pain the steelers put your Fav team through on those occasions. Pain to this day I might add, that still lingers in many of your former players, not to speak of one Al Davis. Hell, they have been crying for years over what happened back then, so in terms of satisfaction, score one big one for us Steeler fans.
Yes, now that I think about it, The Raiders do SUCK!

For you to think for a moment that your FADDERS, that's right little guy, FADDERS, are better than the Black N Gold in any way is Ludichrist. So you Lucked out in 06 when all circumstances had to fail just right to pull out the W when the lopsided stats at games end read, Steelers over 400 total yds, Raiders 99. Huh?? 99 yd's? LOL.

if you think that's not extremely rare, then why don't you look up similar games in NFL History where a team that's been outdistance by over 300 yds and still won. In a PM to me, you stated it happened or probably took place plenty of times, so I'll give you the pleasure of proving it

Now why don't you be a good boy and go ahead and secure the forum of your choice so we can get on with this in true smack form. What's wrong, FEAR getting in your way ------- Again?

I'll check back

Quote:

---

You wanna talk smack? You aren't very good at it, that is obvious. I'll just wait til 9:00 pm when your momma calls you to go to bed. Sad thing is, as a stooler fan, you'll go running cause you know what momma "means" when she calls you to bed. Oh, sure, you'll be back on here at 9:04 - but that's your problem (notice how I used the word "your" in the proper manner - perhaps you can ask your 5th grade teacher tomorrow to explain the proper usage of "your and you're")

Anyway, you better run away now, momma's getting ready to bellow for you...............(what do stooler water buffalo momma's really sound like? Let us know tomorrow).

By the way, if you wanna really talk smack, p.m. me. I will make even your ears burn (I can't help it your momma has tugged on them so hard it makes you look like a dumbo look alike).

Perhaps if you'd go back to the steeler board, you might find a friend.............oh, wait, I've been on that site............it sucks even worse than the stoolers.......no wonder you're here (notice the proper usage of "you're"?)

If I was a fan of a team that had a message board that sucked as much as your momma, I'd be posting elsewhere too I guess. At least you're one of the higher ups in the stooler fandom area - you can almost spell. Now run along - your momma is about to call.

---

The Ramblings of a 13 yr old. Should I really reply to a 13 yr old? Hmmm. I guess it was the Momma smack that gave it away. (MOMMA - Used 8 times in last post alone) Can't say that i blame you though, having to repeat the 4th grade yet again, must be a real drag.

Listen little guy -- You are about as entertaining as a child's inflatable punching toy. You bop it, it springs back, you bop it again and you forget it ever existed. It slowly deflates in an unused corner, then one day you throw it away. Get the idea?

Now go back and Practice more Momma jokes, it becomes you.

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Earlier, I said "the Steelers don't suck", and I immediately began vomiting and a swarm of locusts invaded my house.

So, I think it's pretty clear that the Steelers do actually suck.

---

I hope their front seven have to suck tomato soup out of a straw after Thomas, Steinbeck, Fraley, Tucker or Friedman, Schaffer, and Vickers, et al knock their teeth out.

Go Browns!!!!!
.
..and then I'll enjoy watching them suck wind chasing Edwards, Winslow, JJ etc.

---

You can't be serious??? Don't you think it best to finally get a W over the Black & Gold first before going on a rant? Sorry LA, but another Dose of Reality coming your way this Sunday. Nice dream though

BTW -- Remember, Browns are STILL #30 in the league defensively, Vs the Steelers #5 Offense. Also, Pittsburgh has allowed Fewest points in the entire NFL. Just for you're FYI

Quote:

---

It's good to see that the Steelers now suck on a global international level.

---

Quote:

---

...I'm conversing with someone who's dealing with severe emotional problems, the least of which is not insecurity...

---

Now THAT'S funny. I love it when stooler fans try to intellectualize.

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

I was quite happy with my "page of unadulterated BS", but I guess you simply don't like my style of writing.
You call me "faderboy", which seems quite odd to me. Fader is defined as a device used to control sound volume. So...I am a boy that likes to...control sound?

Great smack (caught me quite off guard)

Take it to another forum? That is quite fine with me, but why can't we do it here? The rules? Are you that scared of getting banned for a short period of time (from a board that doesn't even support your own team) that you won't talk smack with me here?
Trust me when I say this. If you are really that good that you could "school" me "in real smack" - Then rules shouldn't be able to restrain greatness.

I don't really know what forum we should take this smack "battle" to. You see, I don't really have a habit of hanging around random forums that I could take a smack battle to if I need to. I visit this forum and one other, which doesn't seem to fit your oddly specific guidelines.

I don't need to take it to another forum to tear you apart at the "emotional seams". You see, I seemed to make you pretty emotional after you read my post about Ben Worthlisberger. But, once we do finish our battle, I would have no problem with you sending the links to anyone. I just don't think that you would like it when they laugh at your foolishness.

"Making short work of you should present no problems" - Is that what you thought about our PMs? Because I could post those too and see what people say about them. We could let them decide. Also, I'm just wondering why you never made a reply to my PM? is it because you couldn't come up with anything good to say? (these questions are tough - don't be pressured into answering them)

I have a large reservoir of "undiluted gibberish"? What do you call this: "Does your train of thought have a caboose?" (a quote from your post if you didn't notice). Who talks like that? That has to be the stupidest thing I have heard all week.

So - you look forward to blindness. I guess my jabs at the steelers (combined with a couple years of looking at Big Ben's face) are just too much for your little eyes.

You quote Thomas Brackett (Reed I presume). Since you feel the need to call on others quotes (other than mine or yours) to argue for you - I figure that I would also use another source.
Wikipedia says that he was ridiculed (not praised) and that people called him Czar Reed. It also says that he was unable to stop the Spanish-American War. It seems much like you. You are unable to stop the War that I have started with you (simply because your smack isn't good enough to end it - and I am too ruthless to let your "smack" go uncriticized). You are also ridiculed (much like Reed) because people are constantly calling you names such as "stooler".

Wow. You want to talk about our records from 1970 to present. You then ask over the past 20 years who has the better record. Last time I checked, 1970 to present is 37 years. I guess "20" is close enough for a steelers fan (I mean 17 isn't that far off).

Now you seem confused. You ask how many SB's my favorite team has won (the Raiders) - but in our PMs you seem fully convinced that I am not a raider fan. If we go with the Raiders then it is 3 (but that could be 20 or -14 for all you care). You have me in the SB category - but you never asked what the Raider's total record against the steelers is. Sources tell me that the Raiders lead the series 9-8 overall. Thats what I thought. It seems to me that you are the one with little room to talk. JUST SAYING.

If you still want to talk smack to me then I can't wait to see your response. Just don't give me any of the "I could talk better smack on another forum" crap. You can't. If that is the only way to finish this - then I guess I will appease you some day.

This is too much fun for me. I hope you can say the same. Now for some smilies:


SteelTheBest is StillTheWorst

---

Well first off, after reading another long winded contribution from you, it became obvious to me, that I'm conversing with someone who's dealing with severe emotional problems, the least of which is not insecurity, along with a Need to feel important in a forum where no one really cares. You could have condensed this latest Novel reply of yours to 2, possibly 3 Medium sentences, but I see you're needs would not allow this.

The rest of you're reply screams of sheer desperation, but you're just gullible and naive enough to believe that it's not apparent to others.

You're writings indicate you probably suffer with psychotic episodes, plenty of them, and that's why its important meds are taken on a consistent basis? This way, when you reply, it just may cut the ramblings you seem to have an
affinity for in half. Seriously, no smack intended.

I asked if you would like to take this to another forum, where the rules of smack are much more relaxed simply because what I have to say and convey to you would not cross the somewhat stringent boundaries that have been in place here since day one. Asked you to pick the place and time, but I see your fear of being exposed supersedes all else. I understand.

Regards the Steelers Vs Raiders. Aside from the 9 - 8 advantage, tell me, what team inflicted more damage on the other when it really counted? I count 2 possibly 3 SB denials in the 70's alone, not to speak of the extreme pain the steelers put your Fav team through on those occasions. Pain to this day I might add, that still lingers in many of your former players, not to speak of one Al Davis. Hell, they have been crying for years over what happened back then, so in terms of satisfaction, score one big one for us Steeler fans.
Yes, now that I think about it, The Raiders do SUCK!

For you to think for a moment that your FADDERS, that's right little guy, FADDERS, are better than the Black N Gold in any way is Ludichrist. So you Lucked out in 06 when all circumstances had to fail just right to pull out the W when the lopsided stats at games end read, Steelers over 400 total yds, Raiders 99. Huh?? 99 yd's? LOL.

if you think that's not extremely rare, then why don't you look up similar games in NFL History where a team that's been outdistance by over 300 yds and still won. In a PM to me, you stated it happened or probably took place plenty of times, so I'll give you the pleasure of proving it

Now why don't you be a good boy and go ahead and secure the forum of your choice so we can get on with this in true smack form. What's wrong, FEAR getting in your way ------- Again?

I'll check back

---

Quote:

---

Well first off, after reading another long winded contribution from you, it became obvious to me, that I'm conversing with someone who's dealing with severe emotional problems, the least of which is not insecurity, along with a Need to feel important in a forum where no one really cares. You could have condensed this latest Novel reply of yours to 2, possibly 3 Medium sentences, but I see you're needs would not allow this.
The rest of you're reply screams of sheer desperation, but you're just gullible and naive enough to believe that it's not apparent to others.

You're writings indicate you probably suffer with psychotic episodes, plenty of them, and that's why its important meds are taken on a consistent basis? This way, when you reply, it just may cut the ramblings you seem to have an
affinity for in half. Seriously, no smack intended.

I asked if you would like to take this to another forum, where the rules of smack are much more relaxed simply because what I have to say and convey to you would not cross the somewhat stringent boundaries that have been in place here since day one. Asked you to pick the place and time, but I see your fear of being exposed supersedes all else. I understand.

Regards the Steelers Vs Raiders. Aside from the 9 - 8 advantage, tell me, what team inflicted more damage on the other when it really counted? I count 2 possibly 3 SB denials in the 70's alone, not to speak of the extreme pain the steelers put your Fav team through on those occasions. Pain to this day I might add, that still lingers in many of your former players, not to speak of one Al Davis. Hell, they have been crying for years over what happened back then, so in terms of satisfaction, score one big one for us Steeler fans.
Yes, now that I think about it, The Raiders do SUCK!

For you to think for a moment that your FADDERS, that's right little guy, FADDERS, are better than the Black N Gold in any way is Ludichrist. So you Lucked out in 06 when all circumstances had to fail just right to pull out the W when the lopsided stats at games end read, Steelers over 400 total yds, Raiders 99. Huh?? 99 yd's? LOL.

if you think that's not extremely rare, then why don't you look up similar games in NFL History where a team that's been outdistance by over 300 yds and still won. In a PM to me, you stated it happened or probably took place plenty of times, so I'll give you the pleasure of proving it

Now why don't you be a good boy and go ahead and secure the forum of your choice so we can get on with this in true smack form. What's wrong, FEAR getting in your way ------- Again?

I'll check back

---

Hmm... I'm getting tired of you not answering all of my smack. Obviously, you can't think of anything to say, so you just ignore it (although the things you do think of - would be better off unsaid). Whenever you are presented with good smack, you can't respond and just reply saying the person has mental/emotional problems. So, basically you can't even answer the smack of someone you think is emotionally unstable.
Why would I come to a browns board to feel important? I come to talk smack and have some fun arguing. If "no one really cares" - then why do you care enough to respond to everyone's smack? Nice job, hypocrite. Don't complain about my long replies - and then go ahead and write a long reply of your own. Do you not realize what you did there?
Then you go off about the whole forum thing again. What unacceptable words would you call me on another board. Hopefully not one that rhymes with Raider (like fadder) because those are way out of line and very hurtful (note my sarcasm). I have a fear of being exposed? Exposed as what? Why don't we just exchange email addresses? Easy as that and we don't have to find a forum. Then you could post our conversations on your fridge (if you even have one) and think for a second that you have the competence to beat me in an argument.

Ahh, I knew you would bring up the playoffs. You asked me which team had the better record in the past 20 seasons. I'm guessing you meant just regular season games because neither team made the playoffs every year. Although the playoff games mattered more at the time, in the overall record - you don't get 2 points of a win here and only 1 for another. They are all worth the same. So, the overall record applies. What you are saying is: if Oakland beats the steelers in a playoff game, but the steelers beat the raiders in 2 regular season games - then they even out because playoffs are worth more. I know you will have a reply to me on this one - but I'm just happy you were able to do your addition right (it was 2 - but the raiders beat the steelers once too - so technically only 1).

Now you go back to the 2006 game (which we discussed by PM already). Do you suffer from short term memory loss? or can you not get over this game. You keep forgetting to add the turnover stats. Big Ben threw 4 INTS and 2 were returned for TDs. That is just good D by the raiders. They may have had other turnovers too. Oakland had only 1 (an interception). Also, from what I know, the steelers had over 300 yards, but not 400 (but I'm unsure on that). When did I say that it took place many times? Thats right - I didn't. I did say that with the combined stats and turnover ratio, then it would be a lot more likely to take place.

The only thing I fear about you is your stupidity. Your whole reply screams of grammatical incompetence. First off, you capitalize random words like "need" and "novel" - which were not at the beginning of sentences.
You also don't know the difference between "your and "you're". I counted at least 2 misuses.
You can't even use "?" right. Look: "You're writings indicate you probably suffer with psychotic episodes, plenty of them, and that's why its important meds are taken on a consistent basis?" That is a statement, not a question. You also used "you're" wrong there.
You also used the word "Ludichrist", which you capitalized for no reason. That is most definitely not a word. I believe you were looking for the word "ludicrous".

I really want to post our PMs. Would that be ok with you? (after all, they are private)
Tell me if you want to do the email thing instead of the forum. If all else fails, I will make my own forum just so we can smack.

Oh, dear God! I accidentally wrote a long reply again. I forgot that you don't read (or write) well. Hopefully you were able to finish this long post. It might help to read it in steps.

Love,
Your dear friend, The Snacks

Quote:

---

Oh, dear God! I accidentally wrote a long reply again.

---

and no, it doesn't take that long to resmack a guy, although nothing stops some people from believing they don't suck....


.........segway.......




ahem, the steelers still suck.

Quote:

---

i may not live in cleveland, but those bastards infiltrate even as far away as here in salmon. i got brand new neighbors, a cute looking couple with a baby, they stole my trash can. seriously, they took it and put it on their porch.

guess what, the diptard has a steelers bumper sticker. ugh.

---

They probably consider it an addition to their home, another room for the baby...

either way you look at it, Squeelers Suck