Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
While discussing the Watson case in numerous threads, I brought up the sins of Daniel Snyder and how the NFL was not punishing him for his role in Washington's organization. I posted numerous articles about the case. His transgressions were far worse than anything Watson was accused of. However, posters who were trashing Watson and the Browns dismissed what Snyder was doing. Now, there is more news coming out.

Quote
Sources: Commanders boss Snyder claims 'dirt' on NFL owners, Goodell
play
8:27 AM ET


About this report
This story was reported and written by ESPN's Don Van Natta Jr., Seth Wickersham and Tisha Thompson.

DAN SNYDER DOES this thing when he feels cornered, say those who know him well. He paces in a hotel suite, or on his superyacht, or at River View, his $48 million Virginia estate. Cradling a drink in one hand, he tells members of his inner circle about the dirt he has accumulated on fellow owners, coaches, executives, even his own employees -- all the stuff he's learned from other sources, including private investigative firms. He never says exactly what he knows, only that in his 23 years as owner of the Washington Commanders, he knows a lot. And that in the zero-sum world of billionaires, this is how you survive. Snyder recently told a close associate that he has gathered enough secrets to "blow up" several NFL owners, the league office and even commissioner Roger Goodell.

"They can't f--- with me," he has said privately.


Senior team executives and confidants have heard him say it since he was considered merely one of the worst owners in sports. Now that he's facing investigations on multiple fronts and running out of high-powered allies, he alludes more than ever to the dirty work. Snyder, now 57 years old, has told associates he will not lose his beloved franchise without a fight that would end with multiple casualties.

"The NFL is a mafia," he recently told an associate. "All the owners hate each other."

"That's not true," one veteran owner says. "All the owners hate Dan."

Something has to give, possibly as soon as the NFL league meetings in New York on Tuesday. Many owners and top league executives tell ESPN they would like to see Snyder removed as owner. It would clean the slate for a storied team and a cherished fan base and reignite the pursuit for a desperately needed stadium.

But there would be a price.


Multiple owners and league and team sources say they've been told that Snyder instructed his law firms to hire private investigators to look into other owners, including longtime ally Jerry Jones of the Dallas Cowboys. AP Photo/Michael Ainsworth
Backed into a corner
WHY IS DAN Snyder still an NFL team owner? And how has he managed to survive allegations of a toxic club culture, sexual harassment, accounting misdeeds and the bungling of a new stadium proposal that once seemed inevitable and is now met with hard resistance by the public and officials in Virginia, Maryland and Washington, D.C.? Those questions have bewildered fans, league and team executives and some fellow owners, and the lawyers for former Commanders employees who say they were victims of the team's culture of sexual harassment and abuse. "Our clients and the public at large deserve transparency," said Lisa Banks, attorney for nearly a dozen former team employees and cheerleaders who publicly revealed the team's toxic culture in 2020 and are still calling for the NFL to make public its investigative report on Snyder. "If not," Banks said in a statement last year, "the NFL and Roger Goodell must explain why they appear intent on protecting" the team and "Dan Snyder at all costs."

EDITOR'S PICKS

Snowboard coach accused of sexual assault
204dAlyssa Roenigk and Tisha Thompson

Cowboys paid $2.4M over cheerleader allegations
239dDon Van Natta Jr.

Welcome to the Sean McVay Moment
65dSeth Wickersham
According to more than 30 owners, league and team executives, lawyers and current and former Commanders employees interviewed by ESPN, the fear of reprisal that Snyder has instilled in his franchise, poisoning it on the field and off, has expanded to some of his fellow owners. Multiple owners and league and team sources say they've been told that Snyder instructed his law firms to hire private investigators to look into other owners -- and Goodell.

League sources say the NFL is aware that Snyder has claimed to be tracking owners. But none of the owners or sources would reveal how they learned of Snyder's alleged effort to use private investigators. It's also unclear how many owners are said to have been targeted, though sources say they believe it's at least six. One owner was told by Snyder directly that he "has dirt on Jerry Jones," a team source told ESPN, though the nature of the information was unclear. Another source confirmed that Snyder has told a confidant that he has "a file" on Jones, the Dallas Cowboys owner who has served as Snyder's friend, mentor and longtime firewall of support.

The Commanders declined to make team officials, including Dan Snyder and his wife, Tanya, available for interviews but issued a statement attributed to a group including team employees and law firms. A Commanders spokesperson and outside lawyers denied that Snyder has hired or authorized private investigators to track another team's owner and league office executives, including Goodell. "This is categorically false," said John Brownlee and Stuart Nash, partners at Holland & Knight. "He has no 'dossiers' compiled on any owners."

A team spokesperson called it "simply ridiculous and utterly false" that Snyder ever said that he could blow up the league, or that the league "can't f---" with him, or that "the NFL is a mafia" or "all owners hate each other."

To the contrary, the spokesperson said, "Owners have a shared love of the game, mutual respect for each other and our organizations, and a strong working relationship."

ESPN's reporting "cannot change the team's great transformation or the Snyders' commitment to making this transformation permanent," Brownlee and Nash said in the statement.

Most sources declined to go on the record for this story; Goodell has warned owners that they could be fined millions of dollars for leaking to reporters. Snyder "thinks he has enough on all of them," says a former longtime senior Commanders executive. "He thinks he's got stuff on Roger." Another former Commanders executive routinely called Snyder "the most powerful owner in the NFL" because of what he knows, a source says.

Several owners say that they see the threats about damaging dossiers as a desperate tactic intended to scare owners from voting to remove Snyder. "He's backed into a corner," says a veteran owner who says he's aware Snyder has gathered dirt on some owners. "He's behaving like a mad dog cornered."


In a bid to shore up support, Snyder has visited a handful of owners around the country, sources say, and he has told associates that he is confident that he won't be voted out. "Dan has the support of many of his peers," a spokesperson said. Jamie Squire/Getty Images
Counting friends and foes
THE POTENTIAL FOR mutually assured destruction might help explain why Snyder has survived years of scandals. Or it might merely reveal that Snyder is running out of options. He is under attack from multiple fronts: His team, his employees and his own conduct have been investigated by Congress, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the league office twice. At least 24 owners are required to force Snyder to sell his team, a fate that he has told multiple sources he will never accept. An associate who has met with Snyder multiple times recently says Snyder has become "paranoid" about owners and league office executives, and about former employees breaking their non-disclosure agreements and telling investigators and reporters what they know. Snyder sees "evil lurking in every shadow and around every corner," the associate says. "Someone is always out to get them."

Snyder's fears might not be totally unfounded. Jerry Jones recently told confidants that he "might not be able" to protect Snyder any longer. Snyder has also "badmouthed" Jones, telling an owner recently, "he's only out to get in your pocket. He'll sell you down the river. You can't trust him," a senior executive close to the owner said. "Snyder's already lost Jerry," the source added.

In the Commanders' statement, lawyers denied that Snyder's relationship with Jones has soured, saying he and Tanya "have a close and strong relationship with Jerry Jones and his entire family" and "great respect and admiration for one another." "We also understand that certain people believe their own interests will be advanced by convincing news outlets like ESPN to print false information about the Snyders and Joneses," the Holland & Knight lawyers wrote.

Jones declined to comment for this story, said Jim Wilkinson, a Cowboys spokesman who also declined to comment.

There is a growing consensus around the league that, despite news releases to the contrary, the Commanders have struggled to establish a more inclusive culture. And sources told ESPN they wonder if Jason Wright, the team's president and the first Black man in NFL history to hold that title, has true authority to fix the team. Current and former team executives say Snyder is still far more involved running the club than most realize, imploring football decision-makers last March to trade for quarterback Carson Wentz -- despite a deal he made with Goodell in July 2021, when he was also fined $10 million, to give up day-to-day management to his wife, Tanya.

With Snyder backed into a corner, some owners are now considering creative ways of pushing him aside, including refusing to let him borrow money for a new stadium.

In a bid to shore up support, Snyder has visited a handful of owners around the country, sources say, and he has told associates that he is confident that he won't be voted out. "As a longtime owner, Dan has the support of many of his peers," the team spokesperson said. If any such vote about Snyder's fate is held, it won't likely be because the commissioner has pushed for one. Goodell has made clear that Snyder's permanent status is an ownership decision, and he has avoided mentioning Snyder at closed-door meetings. Sources say Goodell is clearly more comfortable challenging owners on issues related to the integrity of the game than the culture of their businesses. Indeed, it galls some owners and league and team executives that the NFL has been in lockstep with Washington on many fronts, "propping up" the franchise, in the words of one owner, by burying attorney Beth Wilkinson's report about the team's toxic workplace last year, and by helping the Commanders avoid penalties for repeated violations of the Rooney Rule. It's clear, one owner says, that Goodell "doesn't want to touch this."

"This is what happens when you get into business with bad people," the owner says about Snyder. "They know he'll burn their houses down."


Snyder, at 34, was the youngest-ever person to buy an NFL franchise when he became Washington's owner in 1999. STEVE SCHAEFER/AFP via Getty Images
'He got off on the wrong foot'
"DANIEL SNYDER IS the perfect person."

That's what Paul Tagliabue said in May 1999, when the commissioner presided over the sale of the storied Washington franchise for $800 million, making the 34-year-old Snyder the youngest-ever person to buy an NFL franchise. It didn't take long for some owners to disagree with Tagliabue's sunny assessment. During the first run of owners meetings he attended, Snyder came across as brash and sharp-elbowed, impatient and disrespectful toward owners twice his age. Asked for his early view of Snyder, a veteran owner now says: "Arrogant. Obnoxious. Standoffish. Selfish."

But it wasn't until the 2003 autumn league meetings, held in Chicago, that some owners' first impressions of Snyder would stick. Snyder delivered an impassioned but barbed argument for the Super Bowl to be played at FedEx Field in Landover, Maryland, in February 2008. His was a longshot bid. His main competition was Cardinals owner Bill Bidwill and his son Michael, who were building a $455 million stadium in Glendale, Arizona. The Bidwill family, which has owned the Cardinals since 1932, is beloved among owners, and owners were excited about the new venue in the desert.

In his pitch for a Washington Super Bowl, Snyder spent as much time extolling the virtues of FedEx Field as he did "tearing down Arizona and the Bidwills personally," an owner recalls. After the Bidwills and Arizona won a secret ballot, Snyder "began yelling at everybody," angrily telling owners they had made "a big mistake," an owner says. "Other owners were floored. ... He got off on the wrong foot. And not much has changed since then."

The nearly two decades since have laid bare what critics see as Snyder's vindictiveness and paranoia, which was well-known within Washington's front office for most of his ownership. Outside the team, Snyder has been better known for losing seasons and his penchant for micromanaging, despite publicly insisting in 2020 that the team's culture problem was because he was "admittedly too hands-off as an owner." He has always insisted on acquiring big names of the moment to save his team, from Deion Sanders to Bruce Smith to Robert Griffin III to Josh Norman to the late Dwayne Haskins, regardless of what his football decision-makers advocated. "I'm the f---ing owner, and if you don't do this, I'm going to kill you," he'd sometimes tell high-level football staff half-jokingly, a former team executive says.

Snyder cycled through football regimes but kept certain lieutenants around as forced companions as much as trusted advisers, summoning them at all hours to his estate. In the view of several former Washington executives, he was a lonely man seemingly devoid of true friends. Snyder seemed to value former football operations executive Vinny Cerrato as a gofer, a weightlifting partner and a drinking buddy, but often ripped him in plain view of others and belittled his football intelligence. When Bruce Allen arrived as a team executive in 2009, Snyder appeared to aides and others around the league as jealous of him. Unlike Snyder, Allen was popular among owners, someone they would seek out at league meetings for dinner or drinks. In 2018, Snyder hired Brian Lafemina, a well-liked executive from the league office, to run the business operation. Lafemina testified in his congressional deposition that he felt as if Snyder was jealous of him, too. Lafemina was alarmed by the club's cultural issues and says he tried to fix them -- and lasted only six months before Snyder fired him.


Snyder's team hired Beth Wilkinson, a veteran Washington, D.C., lawyer, to investigate claims of a toxic work environment in July 2020. Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images
For years, it seemed that Snyder's biggest off-the-field problem was his stubborn refusal to rename his team. That changed in 2020, when a Washington Post report on the team's culture included numerous allegations of chronic sexual harassment and multiple incidents of misconduct, including some made by former team cheerleaders who accused team executives of creating videos of them partially nude, making disparaging sexual remarks, asking for dates and telling female employees to flirt with suiteholders.

Snyder dismissed the report as "a hit job." The team hired Beth Wilkinson, a veteran Washington, D.C., lawyer, to investigate the claims in July 2020. But Snyder was "actively interfering" with the Wilkinson inquiry by using private investigators to "harass and intimidate witnesses," congressional investigators found. Goodell and the league took over the investigation in August 2020.

The congressional inquiry would later uncover internal documents showing how the league and Snyder's legal team had secretly struck a deal, known as a "common interest agreement," that meant both had to sign off before any information was released. This effectively gave Snyder veto power over the release of negative information, as well as "direct access" to influence the Wilkinson investigation, a June 2022 report from the committee said. "This agreement ... afforded Mr. Snyder a back-channel to block the release of information and make confidential presentations designed to steer the course of the investigation," the report said. "The Commanders informed the Committee that Mr. Snyder continued to receive periodic updates throughout the course of the Wilkinson Investigation."

Documents released by the congressional committee in February show Wilkinson initially signed a retainer promising to deliver "a complete written report," but Goodell requested she brief him orally. Rather than delivering a written report, Wilkinson ended up reading from notes detailing the findings of her inquiry, according to people with firsthand knowledge.

The NFL still has not made Wilkinson's findings public despite repeated calls for their release by more than 40 former team employees and a growing list of state and federal lawmakers. Although most owners widely dislike Snyder, many were relieved and hopeful that they had moved past so many negative headlines, especially after Goodell and Snyder reached an agreement on daily management and a fine, sources say. "It did what it had to do," says an owner of the Wilkinson inquiry. "It was damage control."

However, some owners saw the sexual misconduct allegations leveled by employees against senior executives -- and one, in particular, targeting Snyder -- as deeply troubling. In 2009, Snyder settled an allegation with a former team employee for $1.6 million, according to a December 2020 report in The Washington Post. A former team employee accused Snyder of groping her, asking her for sex, and trying to remove her clothes on his plane. Snyder has denied the woman's claim as "meritless." His lawyers told ESPN that "as Snyder testified under oath to the House Oversight Committee, an investigation found that the alleged incident never occurred." They added that Snyder settled with her because it was less expensive than fighting her in court.

Last year, however, Snyder's lawyers unsuccessfully attempted to keep the woman from discussing the alleged incident with anyone, including Wilkinson, by offering to pay her a second undisclosed sum, Brendan Sullivan Jr., the woman's lawyer, told ESPN. The offer from Snyder's lawyers was "flatly rejected," Sullivan said. Snyder had offered the woman "a substantial sum" that was "in the seven figures," two sources with firsthand knowledge of the offer said. Lawyers for Snyder denied Sullivan's allegation of a second offer.

Earlier this year, the woman was interviewed by former U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White, who is conducting a new inquiry of Snyder for the NFL, a source added. A former Washington team executive with knowledge of the alleged incident said if all the details of the alleged sexual assault were ever made public, it could be "the tipping point" to Snyder's removal as owner. It presents a conundrum for those who will decide Snyder's fate. Ownership sources said some in their ranks are worried that similar inquiries could be made about their own front offices -- and that over the course of two decades, Snyder had possibly heard about many of them. "There are 31 guys who are petrified" of Snyder, says a sports executive and longtime friend of Goodell. "If you don't care about the fraternity, it's scary."

A congressional committee, which Snyder's lawyer blasted last week as an unfair partisan attack, has looked deeply at Snyder and the team for nearly a year. One of the committee's main concerns is the use of non-disclosure agreements to cover up bad behavior. The committee's damning 29-page report said Snyder "abused the subpoena power of federal courts to obtain private emails, call logs, and communications in an effort to uncover the sources of the Washington Post's exposes, undermine their credibility, and impugn their motives."

Snyder used the Wilkinson investigation as "a tip sheet" for his law firms, according to multiple legal and team sources. "The list of people who opposed him became his enemies list," a former Washington executive says.


Former Washington Commanders employees testified to a congressional committee about issues of workplace misconduct in February. Jonathan Newton/The Washington Post via Getty Images
'No way out'
SNYDER'S AFFECTION FOR using private eyes was shown during the congressional investigation, when one of his law firms, Reed Smith, was found to have hired "private investigators to harass and intimidate" dozens of former team employees during the Wilkinson inquiry. Former team employees told investigators that "Mr. Snyder's use of private investigators intimidated them and discouraged them from participating in the Wilkinson investigation." The resulting product was a 100-slide presentation made to Wilkinson and the league, dated Nov. 23, 2020, according to the report. The presentation "appears to be based on private text messages, emails, phone logs and call transcripts, and social media posts from nearly 50 individuals."

Reed Smith is known to deploy every legal weapon on behalf of clients. Multiple sources with firsthand knowledge say that when Reed Smith represented Alex Rodriguez in his lawsuit against Major League Baseball, a private investigator was hired to track commissioner Rob Manfred. Reed Smith partner Jordan Siev told ESPN in a statement that the firm is "not aware of any investigator having been engaged to investigate" Manfred, and he said he had "no knowledge of any efforts to investigate or compile information" on NFL owners, executives or Goodell. Siev did not respond to questions about whether Reed Smith commissioned investigations of former Commanders employees.

In recent months, Snyder has told close confidants that his private investigators dug up incriminating information about Goodell, other unnamed league office executives and an unknown number of owners. League and ownership sources say there's lots of gossip and speculation about what investigators could have unearthed, but some wonder whether Snyder actually has anything at all and is bluffing as a scare tactic.

Anything that came out would likely be in the form of a leak to The New York Times or The Wall Street Journal, because, multiple league and team sources say, Snyder hates The Washington Post.

Jon Gruden's emails containing racist, misogynistic and anti-gay language were leaked to The Wall Street Journal in early October 2021. A few days later, Bruce Allen's emails were leaked to The New York Times, and Gruden resigned as head coach of the Las Vegas Raiders.

There has been no proof that a person linked to Snyder was behind those leaks. Congress' report found that, in an attempt to deflect blame onto Allen, Snyder's attorneys gave the NFL 400,000 emails from an account used by Allen, whom Snyder fired in December 2019. During the Wilkinson inquiry, Snyder and his attorneys identified specific "inappropriate" emails within the set of 400,000 that "they purportedly believed demonstrated that Mr. Allen should have been the main target of the Wilkinson investigation," the congressional report said, adding that the NFL also confirmed that Snyder's lawyers were arguing that Allen "had created a toxic environment at the Washington Commanders." Allen declined to comment through an associate, while Gruden declined to comment through his attorney.

Half a dozen owners and league executives say they believe that the leaks occurred on Snyder's order or with his blessing. Last fall, some of Reed Smith lawyers told colleagues about how they sorted Allen's emails into categories, including one for possible public relations use, the colleagues said. Siev of Reed Smith denied the firm sorted the emails or played any role in a leak, "nor to the best of our knowledge has any representative of the Commanders or the Snyder family." Gruden has filed a lawsuit against Goodell and the league in Nevada, alleging that Goodell ordered the leak that ended his coaching career -- even though the commissioner denied in an owners-only session last year that the league leaked them.

Sources say the notion of Snyder claiming to possess damaging information -- and threats he might use it -- has outraged some owners, but only to a point. Before league meetings in Atlanta in May, owners were "counting votes" to oust Snyder, USA Today reported. One owner says now that a meeting was being planned then to discuss Snyder's fate. But when the spring sessions began, no Snyder meeting was convened and no vote was considered, much less taken. Some sources blame the inaction on the fact that Tanya Snyder missed the May league meeting, and they felt it would be inappropriate to debate Washington's ownership without anyone from the club present. Other owners say her presence at subsequent meetings made it impossible to have an honest discussion.

Still, owners and team executives say they are impressed by her for twice "taking a bullet" for her husband in closed-door apologies for the team's toxic culture -- while assuming the role of her husband's chief defender publicly and privately. In a statement, Snyder's lawyers said, "Tanya, a breast cancer survivor, is one of the most capable business leaders in America, and she and Dan will continue to work to improve all aspects of the team -- in the front office and on the field."

In recent weeks, Snyder has personally and repeatedly asked Jones to have his back and to persuade fellow owners not to throw him out. But a source says Jones told Snyder he might not be able to help, indicating that support for Snyder has slipped. (When discussing Jones' lack of support, Snyder snapped to a confidant: "Jerry has his own problems.") The source says, "Dan has to make his own defense with owners." Asked if Snyder had reached out to Jones about this story, Cowboys spokesman Jim Wilkinson declined to comment.

Around owners, Jones has been careful not to defend Snyder's character, instead praising how hard Snyder is working to "right the ship" and trying to build a new stadium. "It's the best thing he can say -- he's trying," an executive who has been in the meetings says of Jones' defense. The executive adds that team owners are willing to look the other way on Jones' own issues, including a Cowboys cheerleader voyeurism scandal involving a senior executive reported by ESPN earlier this year and a lawsuit by a 25-year-old woman who says Jones is her father, because his ingenuity and vision for growing the NFL pie has made rich men richer.

The opposite is true with Snyder. Owners and league executives have repeatedly bemoaned the business woes in Washington, which was once one of the league's best markets. Some owners seem more bothered by Snyder's poor financial showing than they are by the sexual misconduct allegations, while acknowledging, as one owner said, that the toxic workplace issues are "not a good look for the league."

"His gate is the lowest in the league, his revenues are significantly low and trending lower," a veteran owner says. "He is costing his fellow owners significant money." Under Snyder's watch, FedEx Field has reduced capacity from more than 90,000 seats to around 64,000 this year. Although the team spokesperson said the team's business prospects have turned around, including a doubling of season-ticket holders and a 30% increase in sponsorships, owners said they haven't seen evidence of improvement.

Multiple ownership and team sources complain that ticket sales for about half those remaining seats are controlled by ticket brokers, the highest ratio in the NFL. "He's a partner -- and he's not pulling his end of the partnership," a senior executive of a rival team says.

"Some owners aren't liked in their cities because their team is losing," the veteran owner explains. "That goes with the territory. Snyder isn't liked because of what he has done to that franchise, with all its history. The stadium is falling apart. The team is underperforming. He can't get a new stadium. There's no way out. ... He may have passed the point of no return."

When asked whether his fellow owners would forgive Snyder for the team's financial woes and the toxic culture scandal if Snyder could build a new stadium, the owner quickly replied, "Yes."

Asked if Snyder is aware of that, the owner said, "Yes."


The Commanders' inability to secure a deal to replace rundown FedEx Field has become a liability that some fellow owners are planning to exploit. Scott Taetsch/Getty Images
'A gang that can't shoot straight'
"THAT STADIUM IS a disaster," a senior team executive says of FedEx Field, the home of the Commanders. "That's the worst stadium in the NFL, by far." Last season, a railing gave way and Eagles fans collapsed onto the field, nearly hitting Philadelphia quarterback Jalen Hurts. Some of those fans have sued the Commanders.

To owners, Snyder's failure to get a new stadium has become a major vulnerability -- and with no easy solution in sight, some owners are quietly preparing to exploit it.

It wasn't long ago that Snyder had so much leverage that the governments of Maryland, Virginia and D.C. were competing to devote public funds for a new stadium. More than three years ago, Maryland's governor offered to help Snyder negotiate the purchase of federal land near the MGM casino and [censored] hotel complex along the Potomac River, but Snyder was disinterested -- a decision that galls some current owners and league executives now.

Last winter, Virginia state Sen. Adam Ebbin received an invitation from Snyder to visit his mansion, which sits on a 16½-acre property once owned by George Washington and that has been called the "most expensive home ever sold in Virginia." Ebbin, who represents Snyder's district, arrived one afternoon about two months before the start of the legislative session. Snyder showed Ebbin photos of other state-of-the-art new stadiums around the country, making clear that he wanted one of his own. Snyder's goal was for a bill that would create a stadium authority that would leverage taxpayer dollars into the creation of a massive commercial development project with a stadium at the center. But when Ebbin pushed Snyder on specifics, like how much tax revenue a new stadium would bring in and what it would ultimately cost taxpayers, Snyder had no answers. Nor did Snyder's chief of staff or two lobbyists also present at his house that day. "It was a weird meeting," Ebbin says.

By February, after the Commanders had raised their spending on lobbyists in Richmond from $10,000 during the previous legislative session to $100,000 in this year's session, Snyder's proposal appeared to have sufficient bipartisan support. The plan called for a $3 billion complex, including a 55,000-seat domed stadium, an outdoor amphitheater, high-end shops and apartments and a practice facility. Two of Virginia's most powerful lawmakers -- one a Democrat, the other a Republican -- had agreed to co-sponsor the stadium bill, and the governor supported the deal. "They presented it as a fait accompli," says Virginia Del. Marcus Simon. The quick bipartisan support, despite all of Snyder's negative headlines, was a naked display of pro football's grip on America.

By March, both the state House and Senate had passed the bill. The stadium bill faced only a conference committee to iron out differences. But lawmakers underestimated a public outcry following the Feb. 3 congressional roundtable at the U.S. Capitol, where five female former employees described numerous allegations of sexual misconduct, both against the team's former senior executives and Snyder himself.

Lawmakers' inboxes were flooded by Virginians, many citing the inquiry. "Using taxpayer funding to pay for anything having to do with this stadium is morally reprehensible," one resident wrote in an email. Wrote another: "Not one penny. ... The owner is the sleaziest of the sleazy."

Prince William County Supervisor Kenny Boddye, who represents the prime spot where the Commanders wanted to build, sent out a survey in June that found 85% of 850 residents surveyed opposed building Snyder's stadium, according to documents obtained by ESPN.

Within weeks, Snyder's bill died an unusual death, unable to escape the conference committee because its sponsors couldn't whip the votes to send it to the governor. "I think lawmakers didn't realize this was going to be such a loser," Ebbin says.

"How toxic do you have to be to have the Senate majority leader and the House appropriations chair to sponsor your bill, and you can't get a vote on it?" Simon says.

Snyder was now stuck. FedEx Field is in Maryland, where Gov. Larry Hogan said in March that he would refuse to engage in a bidding war for a new stadium. And just as the Virginia deal was blowing up, D.C. Council President Phil Mendelson and a majority of the council announced they would oppose construction of a stadium, which the team lobbied for over the past year, unless the NFL releases the Wilkinson report. "If we just ignore that," Mendelson says, "then in a way, we are abetting the abuse. I don't want to be part of that. Release the report."

In late May, the Commanders tried to force Virginia's hand with a maneuver that felt to some lawmakers like a coordinated leak to reveal the team had purchased 200 acres in Boddye's district for $100 million. It turned out that Snyder had purchased only an option to buy the land, an apparent hedge if Virginia's support cratered.

Instead of encouraging lawmakers to push through the stadium bill, news of the land deal rattled Virginia lawmakers who had assumed they were being used as leverage. "It backfired," Simon says. "It did lend to this feeling of a gang that can't shoot straight. ... Either they don't know or they're not telling the truth -- neither of which is good."

Fellow owners, many of whom have built stadiums with far less leverage over local governments, were surprised and bemused that Snyder had managed to blow a bill once championed by Virginia's most powerful politicians. Now, a growing number of owners on the league's finance committee are plotting to use the debacle against him.

Owners know that Snyder likely can't build a stadium without significant financial help. Even if he were to sell ownership stakes in the team, essentially making a cash call on a team valued by Forbes to be the NFL's sixth highest at $5.6 billion, Snyder would still likely fall short. There are league rules in place limiting how much debt owners can carry, but owners have approved debt limit waivers for new stadiums, often making up rules as they go.

A few owners and executives have discussed a rarely enacted option: refusing to let Snyder bypass league rules on how much debt an owner can hold, and possibly withholding the $200 million loan normally available to teams for new stadiums. They say their hope would be to force Snyder into either selling the team or, more likely, transferring ownership permanently to Tanya. They point out that Donald Sterling was forced out of LA Clippers ownership after his racist comments in 2014 not by commissioner Adam Silver or by his fellow owners, but because his wife removed him as a member of the family trust.

"The league's only real tool is to starve him from the funds to build a stadium," a team president says. If owners wanted to trip up Snyder on his debt, a vote they took in March 2021 could give them cover, multiple executive and ownership sources say. Owners allowed Snyder to borrow $450 million to buy out his limited partners -- some of whom he was feuding with in court. "I was surprised they let him do that," says one senior executive with deep ties to both league and ownership.

That vote, sources say, could be used to deny Snyder a new waiver -- and as a backdoor way to force a vote that might garner 24 votes more easily, and faster, than a removal from ownership. It's easier for owners to express concerns over Snyder's finances than other issues, sources say.

"It all comes down to a vote," the executive says. "And there are no rules they have to follow."

Problem is, there are no rules Snyder has to follow, either.


NFL commissioner Roger Goodell has shown little initiative to play any role in kicking out Snyder, despite the sentiment of league staff and a growing contingent of owners. AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster
The rules are different
ON JUNE 22, Goodell testified before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform. Goodell later told associates in colorful language that he couldn't believe that he had to testify as Snyder was on his yacht, dodging Congress. Snyder's 305-foot yacht Lady S, which rents at $1.4 million per week with a 33-person crew, was off the French coast near Cannes that day, according to navigational data. During the hearing, Rep. Rashida Tlaib asked Goodell point-blank about Snyder's fate: "Will you remove him?"

"I don't have the authority to remove him, Congresswoman," Goodell replied, displaying irritation.

But under the NFL Constitution, Goodell has the authority to recommend the removal of an owner to the other 31 owners. He later testified that he was "not aware" of any option for Snyder's removal being discussed among owners.

Goodell has shown little initiative to play any role in kicking out Snyder, despite the sentiment of league staff, many of whom are furious about allegations of the Commanders' toxic environment and Snyder's own behavior, both alleged and confirmed. They are disgusted at having to work on behalf of Snyder and the likes of Jimmy and Dee Haslam, who rewarded Deshaun Watson with a $230 million fully guaranteed contract a year after he was accused of improper sexual behavior by more than two dozen massage therapists. But as another executive familiar with Goodell's thinking says: "When it's an owner in the crosshairs, the rules are different."

Goodell is always taking the temperature of owners, and his main job is to protect them. He won't put Snyder's fate to a vote unless he knows the result wanted by three-quarters of the owners, says a team executive close to Goodell: "But I know Roger wants this off his plate -- he wants Snyder gone tomorrow."

Snyder's fate rests in the owners' hands, and despite their anger toward him, they are apprehensive to remove a fellow owner. They tend to move slowly on any initiative not intended to turn an instant profit.

Owners and executives tell ESPN they're annoyed that Snyder has flaunted how little he cares about his league penalties. Goodell has not used the word "suspended" when publicly discussing Snyder's departure, but usually says he is "stepping away." Snyder's lawyers told ESPN that his mutually agreed separation from the team has ended, and they added that the decision to have Tanya attend recent league meetings was Snyder's "and is not as a result of any requirement imposed by the NFL." In fact, they added, Snyder is no longer under any NFL restriction related to his involvement with the team. Snyder has attended every Washington game this season.


Snyder's lawyers told ESPN that it was his decision to have his wife, Tanya, attend recent league meetings, but a league source told ESPN that Goodell is operating under the premise that Snyder remains under limits imposed during the investigation. Scott Taetsch/Getty Images
NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy declined to answer questions about whether Snyder's suspension has ended, saying in a statement that Goodell's decisions have been "based on a comprehensive workplace review conducted by Beth Wilkinson and the grounds were identified in the public statements made at the time that the discipline and remedial measures were announced." But a league source says Goodell is operating under the premise that Snyder is still under active investigation and the limits imposed upon him will continue. Snyder recently asked permission to attend league meetings again, resuming his old post next to Jones at the table. But Goodell has said no.

The league has quietly gone out of its way to help Snyder through this period of turmoil, irritating some owners and executives. In 2020, the NFL flagged two Snyder hires -- Julie Donaldson to vice president of media and the elevation of longtime Snyder aide Terry Bateman to executive vice president and chief marketing officer -- as violations of the Rooney Rule. Both Donaldson and Bateman are white. At the time, the rule mandated that both a minority and a woman be interviewed for executive positions. If a league inquiry found Rooney Rule violations, it could have cost Snyder money and draft picks. But neither happened.

Snyder's strategy is to "run out the clock" on the congressional and league investigations, betting that Democrats will lose control of the House in January, ending the committee's interest in his franchise, a person close to Snyder says. Entering October's league meetings in New York, Snyder told an associate that he's cautiously optimistic that he'll survive the ongoing league inquiry by Mary Jo White, now entering its ninth month. It's not clear when she will complete her inquiry. A looming factor is the question of what White finds around Snyder's alleged sexual assault of the woman on his plane in April 2009.

What everybody else sees
THINGS ARE DIFFERENT now. Such is the refrain from team executives when confronted by nagging questions about the Commanders' controversies. New people, diverse in background, race, gender and experience, are now running the team. The Snyders have pledged that the toxic culture that Dan Snyder is accused of helping to foster is over, replaced by a new regime that values transparency, diversity and respect for women.

In August 2020, Jason Wright -- a former player and executive at McKinsey & Co. -- was announced as team president, a historic hire that, sources say, came on the recommendation of the league office just weeks before the NFL took over the Wilkinson inquiry. "They placed him," an executive with knowledge of the hire says. Executives and owners who spoke to ESPN were happy for Wright, who they say is well-liked and well-qualified for the job. But they were livid that the league had tacitly aided a team that should have been punished for suspected violations of the Rooney Rule. In the team statement to ESPN, Wright is quoted as saying that he knew the Snyders from previous consulting work and "was hired as a result."

In its 1,400-word statement to ESPN, the team's new spokesperson extolled Wright's leadership for making the team's front office more diverse and inclusive and improving the team's culture. "This organization changed years ago and is a model for what committed leadership can do to transform a workplace when problems are raised to their attention," Wright said in the statement provided by the team, adding that he feels "fully empowered" and citing a positive report from a consultant hired by the team. Tanya has said Wright has full authority to change personnel so Washington can become the "gold standard," in Wright's words. Snyder's lawyers say Wright has done such a good job that "there has been little need for Dan to involve himself in the Team's operations."

But owners, league and Commanders sources told ESPN they don't believe the team can truly be different as long as Snyder owns it and still runs it by issuing instructions on a team landline inside his Virginia mansion. They question whether Wright has actually been empowered to make change.

Wright was supposed to be in charge of the stadium initiative. But after Snyder was punished by Goodell, he announced he would lead all stadium efforts, confusing local lawmakers who didn't know whom they should be talking to. Before he left the team last month for an executive position in private equity, Greg Resh, the Commanders' former COO and a vital member of Snyder's inner circle, told executives at league meetings that he was in charge and dismissed Wright as a figurehead. In the team's statement, Resh denied making "any such comments."

Wright's influence was also in question during the DEA investigation into whether Washington's head trainer, Ryan Vermillion, was illegally dispensing narcotics -- known around the team as the "forgotten investigation." Sources say Wright and chief people officer Andre Chambers wanted to remove Vermillion in early 2021 -- months before the DEA raided Vermillion's home and the Commanders' facility -- when then-head team physician Robin West alleged that he was being verbally abusive toward her and other staff. But when they raised Vermillion's behavior with head coach Ron Rivera, he refused to fire the trainer, making clear it was his call alone. Snyder, desperate for stability, had given Rivera power over all football operations when he was hired in 2020. "Our hands are tied," Wright told people in the organization. (A team spokesperson denied that Wright made that statement.) In August, Vermillion, who declined comment to ESPN through his attorney, entered into a deferred prosecution agreement after he was accused of unlawfully acquiring and dispensing oxycodone. Only then did Rivera terminate Vermillion, calling the situation "unfortunate."

Wright has privately told associates that he feels he can't enact serious cultural change until the ownership situation is resolved. Executives around the league believe that Wright has hired good people in Washington, only to watch them leave for the same reasons they always seem to leave: the culture. Vice president of corporate communications Ashley Whitlock and senior vice president of external affairs and communications Julie Andreeff Jensen, two of the team's most visible woman employees, have left the team within the past year.

When people close to Snyder are asked why he won't just move on with the multibillion-dollar fortune he'd earn from a sale, the answer is elemental: "It's his identity," a source says. He's in an elite club, full of glass houses. And Snyder not only has no shame, the source says, he simply doesn't care that he's hated. In fact, he revels in it. A senior executive who knows Snyder says, "I keep wondering: Why is he still doing this? Why isn't he selling the team? There is no way out. There's no end game. ... That's his character flaw -- he can't look in the mirror and see what everybody else sees."

Snyder has for years told people close to him that both a new stadium and a true franchise quarterback are silver bullets. "All my problems will be solved if I can just get a marquee quarterback," he told an associate last winter. This past March, Washington traded second-, third-, and conditional third-round picks to the Colts for Carson Wentz, a quarterback who in 2017 appeared to be on the verge of being a superstar but whose fortunes have since sunk. It was a stiff price for a soft-market quarterback -- all familiar marks of Snyder's penchant for overpaying and negotiating against only himself. Sources familiar with the deal say that it was Snyder who pushed for Wentz -- and Commanders football staffers have told people around the league as much. "It was 100% a Dan move," says a source with knowledge of the inner workings of the deal. But in the team's statement to ESPN, Rivera insisted that he had brought the idea of acquiring Wentz to Dan and Tanya, who supported it. "They love this game and this team," Rivera said.

Hearing that Snyder hopes a marquee quarterback will chase away all his problems, an owner laughed: "Carson Wentz?"


Sources say the offseason trade for Carson Wentz "was 100% a Dan move," but head coach Ron Rivera said in a team-issued statement he had the idea to bring in the quarterback, who has been mostly a disappointment. Andy Lewis/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images
Friends and rivals
TWO GAMES, ONE at home and one away, in late September and early October, provided the clearest glimpses of where the Commanders are and where they are headed.

When the Commanders hosted the Eagles on Sept. 25, many of the seats at FedEx Field were filled with green and white. It felt like an Eagles home game. As a protest of the ramshackle state of FedEx Field, Eagles fans wrapped themselves in yellow caution tape, which the Commanders sent security officials to confiscate. The Eagles also sent their security chief to hold on to the railing as Hurts jogged into the tunnel. After the loss, in which Wentz was sacked nine times, Washington players lamented that the opposing crowd noise impacted the game. But afterward, some on the business side of the Commanders seemed oddly at peace. All they want is a full stadium, and they came close to it, even if it felt like a neutral-site game.


A week later, Washington visited Dallas. The game itself, which Washington again lost, and in which Wentz played poorly, was almost an afterthought to what preceded it. During pregame warm-ups, Snyder, Tanya and Wright stood at midfield, laughing and listening to Jerry Jones, who stood stiffly. Standing to Jones' left, Snyder smiled and looked tanned and relaxed. There was no sign of conflict or unresolved issues during the visit that lasted only a few minutes. The group posed for a photo, and Jones mustered a half-smile. Washington's social media team posted it, saying: "Friends and rivals for 24 years."

The post was a statement about the team's future as much as its past. As Snyder rode away after the game in a vast motorcade, it was clear that the photo will also stand as a statement on Snyder's status in the league until fellow owners decide his fate -- or, until they own the fact that the decision likely has already been made.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...der-claims-dirt-nfl-owners-roger-goodell

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,503
Likes: 806
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,503
Likes: 806
Unless Dan has proof, it never happened.

Get rid of the guy.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
It's great that you finally started a thread about it rather than continue to try to use it to deflect other threads and justify the actions of another.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
I was listening to a report last night about Snyder and one of the reporters who helped write the article articulated that the NFL owners have been upset w/Snyder for awhile now. Not because he had improper sexual contact w/an employee. Not that sexual misconduct was going on in the organization. Not that he bribed, blackmailed, and threatened witnesses. Not that he inappropriately looked at text messages and emails of the employees who were witnesses, but because he was costing the NFL money w/his issues at trying to get a new stadium.

The other big thing is that they are afraid to go after him because he really does have dirt on some of the other owners.

Their best hope is to transfer the team to his wife and cut him out, much like the NBA did w/Sterling and one other guy whose name escapes me.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275
Yeah, the article basically says the owners would forgive him if he could get a new stadium built. It flopped in the Virginia state house after public backlash.

He's hurting the other owners' bottom line and that's really all they care about.

That article even took a potshot at Jimmy and Dee Haslam!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
well, of course the thing they're actually upset about relates to money... it's the one and only WHY for them doing *anything*.

Look, if you were ever looking for some altruistic fairness between how he has been handled and how Watson was handled, give it up and get over it. It never had or has any chance at all of ever happening. We ALL know this. They do NOT care about what Snyder did, nor do they care about what Watson did. They DO care about how they are perceived insofar as it may impact revenues. Period.

And, there is ZERO chance that a player would EVER get the leeway an owner does unless that player held a TON of stuff over their heads. It's just not going to happen. The "but, fairness!" arguments don't hold water, and never did. They aren't realistic in any way.

If anyone has any misguided illusions that the NFL is a good, wholesome, or decent entity, they really need to just give it up immediately. They are nothing of the sort. They are a corporation that has finagled tax-exempt status. It's a license to print money while being an opiate for the masses. That's it. They care about and exist for themselves, and the owners absolutely, 100%, conduct themselves as such -- except when they need to give appearances to the contrary.

Anything less than the above is pure naiveite.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
You would think people would understand such things as it permeates every level of our society. Fair? No. But it never has been.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
For the record.......I was not talking about fairness. I am talking about where is the outrage? Of course the NFL is only going to act if it draws a ton of negative public attention. Hell, they are already allowing Kamara to get away w/what he did. I just find it odd that Browns fans who made such a stink about Watson are not making a stink about this particular case.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
Thank you for telling us what we should be outraged about. I knew we wouldn't have to wait long.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Thank you for telling us what we should be outraged about. I knew we wouldn't have to wait long.


Did he steal your drum? rofl

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
No, he's not quick enough to pull that off. And neither are you for that matter.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
We didn't sign Dan Snyder, nor did we trade away a ton of resources and Cap for anything to do with Dan Snyder. Dan Snyder isn't here or part of here.... so, why on earth would any of us care about what happens to him?

The only reason anyone on here would care about Dan Snyder's situation is if they wanted to build a paper argument based on things nobody cares about and don't affect us.

THAT is why nobody is outraged about Dan Snyder.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

2 members like this: PitDAWG, FATE
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
just find it odd that Browns fans who made such a stink about Watson are not making a stink about this particular case.
No, you just want to manufacture an imaginary holier than thou platform for yourself using things that have no impact on the Browns.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

1 member likes this: PitDAWG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Yes sir. It's your board.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Indeed it is, but that has nothing to do why your paper argument is ridiculous.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Despite what the Almighty thinks, this is a big story and it isn't going anywhere. Serious allegations are out there for all to see [should they choose to open their eyes.] Congress is involved. Bribery, intimidation of witnesses, sexual misconduct on many levels, blackmail, etc. But now, we don't care about the poor women. GMAFB!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
It is a big story and it likely isn't going anywhere at all, for sure..... what also isn't changing is the lack of relevance to the Watson situation when it comes to whether or not people should feel "outrage". We didn't sell the farm for Dan Snyder. He's somebody else's problem to worry about; not ours. I don't have the bandwidth to give Harumphs over every little situation somebody might bring up; I limit myself to those things that affect the things I'm concerned with.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,945
Likes: 763
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
Despite what the Almighty thinks

And, aren't we so, so petty..... but, I'm pretty sure everyone around here realized this long, long ago.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

1 member likes this: PitDAWG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 1808
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 1808
j/c...

If Snyder were our owner and Watson was still with the Texans, I wonder if there would be posters here with their hair on fire because we weren't outraged enough by Watson? 🤔

I don't care about Snyder, he has nothing to do with the Cleveland Browns. I didn't watch my team mortgage their future for him, give him a quarter B, and then wait to see "what happens" with 20+ legal cases.

And in this world of everyone carrying their virtue-signaling-torches, would being equally outraged with Snyder make what Watson has done alright?? Probably not. Just a strawman arguing point to try to shed false light on how terrible "other" fans are.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 1808
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 1808
“Racist Twitter Keeping Deshaun Watson Trending To Save Dan Snyder”: Browns QB Supporters’ Latest Conspiracy Theory


Browns QB Deshaun Watson was recently slapped with yet another s*xual misconduct lawsuit. While many are asking the league to impose a lifetime ban on him, his admirers reckon he has been framed.

Deshaun Watson has attracted more attention than any other football player in recent times. He was accused of s*xually assaulting a number of women and although the fans were expecting the league to suspend him for at least a complete season, he walked away with a 6-game suspension.

Later, the suspension was extended to 11 games and a $5 million fine was also imposed on the man who signed a $230 million deal with the Browns while he was facing multiple lawsuits.

Everything was getting back on track for Watson as he was destined to join the Browns for practice by mid November and was cleared to play his first game of the season against the Texans in December.


Deshaun Watson Fans Reckon He Has Been Framed by The League

However, most recently, he was slapped with the 26th s*xual harassment lawsuit. Immediately, a number of people started bashing Watson on Twitter but his supporters believe that there might be bigger powers at play here.

A number of people have pointed out on Twitter that as soon as Washington Commanders owner Dan Snyder’s latest controversy caught public attention, Deshaun Watson was slapped with another lawsuit.

Watson admirers are claiming that the Browns quarterback’s name is being used by the NFL to distract people from the Dan Snyder issue which has the potential to tarnish the image of top league executives and several team owners.

For the unversed, several reports have emerged in the last couple of days stating that Dan Snyder apparently hired private investigators in order to find out some dirt on NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and many other franchise owners.

As per ESPN, Snyder told an associate that other owners and even Goodell won’t f*ck with him as he has enough information to blow up the league.

Snyder was all over Twitter and tonnes of fans were calling out the NFL for being a terrible organization but within hours, the focus shifted completely on Deshaun as he was accused of harassment by another woman.

Watson fans are using this rationale to establish that the Browns might have been framed. Only time will tell what happens next in the Snyder and the Watson case.


https://thesportsrush.com/nfl-news-...-qb-supporters-latest-conspiracy-theory/


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275
j/c...


Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,475
Likes: 162
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,475
Likes: 162
Wouldn't be surprised if Snyder is out as an owner in the next 6-12 months


<><

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Quote
Jim Irsay’s Comments Have Turned Up the Heat on Dan Snyder


The Colts’ owner went where no one else in the league has yet, and a standoff with the Commanders’ boss appears to be looming. He spoke to The MMQB about those comments.
ALBERT BREER12 HOURS AGO

In this story:
Washington Commanders
WASHINGTON COMMANDERS
You Are Reading Your 1 Of 4 Free Premium Articles
Subscribe For Unlimited Access
Already A Subscriber? Please Login Here

NEW YORK — If the day comes when Dan Snyder—finally, once and for all, and by whatever method it happens—finds himself without an NFL franchise, Oct. 18 will be remembered as a milestone on the path there.

And Tuesday, the gloves came off.

While no other owner went where Colts owner Jim Irsay so willfully did, it was clear inside the posh lower Manhattan hotel where the NFL fall meeting was held which way the wind was blowing on the future of the Commanders. And that future increasingly seems like it won’t include the guy who bought the team 23 years ago.

Snyder’s not walking a metaphorical ownership Green Mile yet. But that’s clearly in sight.

Washington Commanders owner Daniel Snyder
The NFL is awaiting an investigation from Mary Jo White to determine next steps with Snyder.

Tim Heitman/USA TODAY Sports

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell was forthright early Tuesday night when he said that outside of his own guidance to owners to allow for Mary Jo White to complete her investigation before commenting on Snyder, there wasn’t much discussion on Snyder behind closed doors. What he failed to mention was what was happening between sessions, and over text messages, and in the breakout rooms and hallways of the meeting space.


There, among themselves, owners were discussing what to do with Snyder and his Commanders. It started as soon as the owners filtered into the hotel. It escalated after Irsay said there are “potentially” 24 votes to remove Snyder as co-owner of the Commanders.

The temperature, very clearly, has been turned up. And now it’s come to the point where a standoff seems to be looming—with Snyder more or less daring the owners to vote him out, and on multiple occasions.

The first came last week when a Commanders spokesperson, in a written statement, called ESPN’s exposé on Snyder “part of a well-funded, two-year campaign to coerce the sale of the team, which will continue to be unsuccessful.” The second came Tuesday, after Irsay spoke out, when the same spokesperson in another statement, said, “We are confident that, when he has an opportunity to see the actual evidence in this case, Mr. Irsay will conclude that there is no reason for the Snyders to consider selling the franchise. And they won’t.”

If Snyder comes off like a cornered animal, well, there’s a reason for that. He has to know the score here. That another owner was willing to go on the offensive—and suggest setting the precedent of voting a peer out of the club and forcing the sale of a multibillion-dollar commodity—is mighty significant.

The tenor of the meeting changed when Irsay let 13 words cross his lips in reference to Snyder.

“I believe there is merit to removing him as owner of the [Commanders].”

The assembled reporters peppered him with follow-ups. Irsay doubled down, and doubled down, and doubled down. Next to him on the nearby set of stairs was Colts president Pete Ward, who had a slight smile and didn’t seem in the least surprised by his boss’s comments. A couple of NFL public relations staffers were in earshot, too.

And Irsay’s voice trembled with emotion at times as he continued to bury Snyder. Watching him, it was clear as day to me, having been around Irsay, that this was deeply meaningful to him. He’d put plenty of thought into it—something further backed up by the lack of surprise on the face of Ward and the others around him.

So I tracked down Irsay later in the afternoon and asked, in a quiet moment, why it was so important for him to do what he did. He mentioned having his 13-year-old granddaughter, Charlotte, at training camp this summer, and that she’d be the fourth generation of ownership in his family, and what the impact of the sexual harassment allegations against Snyder and the toxic work culture on his watch would have on her.

“Knowing Wellington [Mara] and Dan Rooney and Lamar [Hunt] and the owners through the years, I know what we’re about as owners,” he told me. “Even in the last day, I had a chance to talk to [former 49ers owner] Eddie DeBartolo [Jr.] and [former commissioner] Paul Tagliabue and just kinda reminisce about the context of decades that have passed and things that have happened. All those things give you certain direction and vision.

“I don’t like the fact that sometimes the way owners are viewed, people think we can do whatever we want, with all the sorts of issues that are out there. Because that’s not true,” Irsay continued. “This is not what we stand for, this sort of thing. I mean, it’s absolutely not. So the league’s very important to me. I’ve been taught by founders of the league and, like I said, Lamar [of the Chiefs] and Wellington [Giants] and Dan Rooney [Steelers] that you do what’s best for the Colts but what’s best for the league, too.


“You have to protect the shield to protect the league, and I don’t like to see the shield damaged. And right now, the shield is taking some damage from all this.”

There’s important context, too, that Irsay was the owner to say something—his own past is checkered, and he was once suspended after pleading guilty to driving under the influence of oxycodone and hydrocodone (he later said that the incident helped him confront his drug addiction). So in being the one to stand up against Snyder, he also put himself squarely in the line of fire, opening himself up to retaliation from Snyder.

His response to the idea of all that, and the chance that Snyder could come back at him, was implicitly, Bring it on. Clearly, this was too big to Irsay for him to keep his mouth shut. And for him, it relates back to the women in his life.

“No question,” he said. “Just having three daughters and seven granddaughters, I can relate to that sort of thing—my seven granddaughters, as they venture off in different forms of working for organizations. I know the culture that we have in Indianapolis. I know the special culture that we have and the family atmosphere that we have developed there. That’s important to me, and I believe it’s important to many owners in this league, because that’s what we’re about.”


Other owners have shown patience in waiting for the findings of the White report. Not Irsay.

Commanders owner Daniel Snyder and Cowboys owner Jerry Jones
The time could come when Snyder hears from Jones that he has to sell his Commanders.

Tim Heitman/USA TODAY Sports

At the end of the day, Jaguars owner Shad Khan stood on a street corner outside the hotel, about to climb into a black Escalade to go home, and said it was important to him to be fair to everyone involved. So he said he’d wait for the White report to come out to offer comment.

“Once it comes out,” he said, climbing into the SUV, “everyone’s going to have an opinion.”

The issue, for now—as Irsay saw it, too—is that the league and the owners will continue to take the brunt of Snyder’s PR damage until then. Fair or not, people will ask, If they just stand by and stay quiet, are they all like him?

Irsay’s message emphatically combatted that perception, and, quietly, at least a couple of other owners applauded him for it. As for what’s next, really, that depends on how quickly White completes her investigation, the findings and then, finally, the stomach the other owners have to sanction a guy who’s very clearly made everyone else in the room look absolutely horrible.


Will they be willing to take on the glass-houses problem Irsay did, in risking that Snyder could start airing everyone’s dirty laundry, according to the ESPN report? Are they O.K. setting a precedent that could lead to pressure to have others sell their teams if they step out of line? Would they be O.K. taking on the legal liability of ousting one of their own, with Snyder’s litigious past a strong indicator that he’d break the lawyers out again in such a circumstance?

One longtime executive said Tuesday night that he doubted they would. He suggested that, if White finds to be true what most assume about Snyder, the NFL would have to have Cowboys owner Jerry Jones go to Snyder and essentially say, “It’s time, I’ll get you your $7 billion. You gotta leave.”

Jones, for his part, on the way out of the hotel, wasn’t tipping his hand much when he was asked, as a longtime defender of Snyder, whether he is still the right owner for the team.

“We’ve all agreed we wouldn’t comment,” Jones said. “We just wouldn’t offer any comment at all. But I know this, I’ve said it, I have no knowledge of anything. And I’m brought up in the article. I have no knowledge of anything that has got any basis to it. Period.”

What was left unsaid there was where Jones stands on Snyder, the man who created this mess for everyone in the first place.

And that said it all.

https://www.si.com/nfl/2022/10/19/jim-irsay-turns-up-heat-dan-snyder-commanders

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 1808
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 1808
lol.

Hookers and blow dude thinks Snyder should be removed. rofl


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
1 member likes this: MemphisBrownie
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Quote
The NFL’s Problems Run Deeper Than Dan Snyder

The NFL may soon remove Dan Snyder from ownership of the Washington Commanders. That will get rid of a problem, but it will not be a solution.

Arif Hasan
By
Arif Hasan
October 19, 2022

The NFL may soon remove Dan Snyder, directly or indirectly, from ownership of the Washington Commanders. That will get rid of a problem, but it will not be a solution.

Rumors have swirled over Snyder’s future control of the team, further made concrete after Colts owner Jim Irsay publicly stated that he believed there was merit to remove Snyder from ownership, further adding that there may be enough votes (24) to do so. He was even bold enough to say that this vote could happen as early as this March.

While this would be the correct move for dozens of reasons, the NFL is structurally set up to create Dan Snyders, and it will never rid itself of that problem for as long as it continues to employ this ownership model — one not unique to American business, but made all the more apparent because of the NFL’s public presence.



Dan Snyder’s Ownership Has Been Nothing but Scandal
The allegations surrounding Dan Snyder are shocking and numerous. Most immediately, Snyder is alleged to have contributed to a toxic working environment rife with sexual harassment, according to the Washington Post and the first 15 alleged victims to come forward about the rampant emotional and sexual abuse they faced while working for the team.

Following that, the Washington Post published a follow-up piece with additional allegations that included reporting on an incident where Washington was alleged to have filmed cheerleaders during a photoshoot without their knowledge, producing lewd videos called “the good bits” on multiple shoots over multiple years.

Additional allegations include Snyder pressuring a cheerleader to have relations with Washington Commanders suite holders, direct accusations of impropriety and harassment from Snyder himself, claims that women were fired from non-public facing roles for not looking sufficiently attractive, and the institution of a set of formal and informal policies preventing women from advancing up the organization.

These allegations are completely separate from another set of accusations reported in the New York Times in 2018, where Snyder and Washington team executives were alleged to have withheld passports from cheerleaders who traveled to Costa Rica for a calendar photoshoot, pressuring them into nude shoots and into escort service with VIPs.


And none of these reports reference a sexual assault allegation from 2009, one that Snyder settled for $1.6 million, or the investigation from the Drug Enforcement Administration into Washington’s trainers for a prescription drug dispersal scheme.

Scandals like these, particularly the most recent ones, inspired a congressional investigation. While both the Post and Times pieces are extremely thoroughly reported with dozens of witnesses, the congressional investigation brought forth additional witnesses with testimony to new incidents of misconduct as well as evidence in the form of emails, text messages, telephone records, and social media posts.


The most recent reporting, this time from ESPN, details Snyder’s spats with the other owners and a concerted effort from some of those owners to remove Snyder from the team’s ownership. Critically, none of the above claims are the driving force behind the movement to remove Snyder.

In the NFL, Money Talks
The owners need Snyder to generate revenue, and FedEx Field is a money-loser.


Because of the shared revenue arrangement between NFL teams and the owners, a money-losing operation drains all the owners, not just the head of one particular franchise.

The scandals surrounding Snyder do play a role — Snyder is unable to secure stadium funding from local governments because politicians are increasingly unwilling to work with him to make a deal happen. This is extraordinary; it is rare for municipalities and states not to work extensively with teams to provide some form of subsidy for stadiums, and most team movement occurs not because of an unwillingness from local governments to provide funding but a genuine desire for an owner to move to a new location.


It’s even more remarkable given how willing those politicians had previously been to work with Snyder, with high-ranking officials on both sides of the aisle willing to sponsor a bill providing stadium funding. After additional scandals came to light, officials from both parties stepped back from that intially strong support.

This is a massive failure of an effort necessitated by poor gate receipts, a stadium literally falling apart, and a sewage rainwater system that spews an all-too-appropriate metaphor for Washington’s attempts at damage control.


These aren’t the only issues holding back the team’s financial potential, as business sponsors have pulled out of lucrative deals with Washington.

Before financial implications reared their head — spurred by further allegations that Washington hid gate revenue from visiting teams — owners did not push for Snyder’s removal. In fact, they approved a deal just last year that allowed Snyder and his family to purchase the remaining shares of the Washington franchise, which resolved internal turmoil among the ownership group that wanted Snyder to be forced to sell.

Irsay’s stated reasoning for going public with his opinions on the state of Snyder’s ownership had to do with the allegations surrounding the toxic workplace culture at Washington, but we know that there have been multiple versions of these allegations that have existed for some time.

The NFL Protected Dan Snyder, but Snyder Is Not the Only Owner Protected by the NFL
The NFL protected Snyder at every turn, refusing to make public or publish the finding of Beth Wilkinson’s report on Washington’s workplace culture. Indeed, that was part of a deal the NFL struck with Washington, allowing the team to veto the release of any information.


Owners have been upset at Roger Goodell’s hands-off policy, which includes a refusal to punish Washington for violations of the Rooney Rule. Nevertheless, ESPN’s report indicates that many owners were happy with how the Wilkinson report was eventually handled as it “did what it had to do,” calling it “damage control.”

It’s no secret that NFL teams are not your friend.

But the explicit belief that investigations into toxic workplace culture that left behind a wake of emotional damage among dozens of employees are meant more for damage control than accountability brings that fact to the forefront.

On top of that, one owner was asked if fellow owners would forgive Snyder for his scandals if Snyder could secure a stadium deal. The owner immediately responded by saying, “Yes.”

ESPN’s reporting suggests that a fear of retaliation could play a role in Goodell’s hesitancy, and that could be the case. Not only has ESPN reported that Snyder has hired private investigators to tail multiple team owners to compile incriminating or damaging information, but of Goodell himself.

They are not alone in this type of allegation, as memos produced in congressional committees detail testimony from witnesses who describe similar investigations. Those private investigator allegations even extended into alleged interference with witnesses who would cooperate with the Wilkinson investigation.

Washington has denied this reporting at every turn.


But fear of retaliation would not explain Goodell’s continued protection of other NFL owners. Goodell expressed confidence in Jimmy Haslam, owner of the Cleveland Browns, after a rebate scandal with his Flying J brand of trucking gas stations allegedly cheated trucking operators out of millions of dollars of value. Goodell went on to affirmatively state that Haslam did not know about the rebate operation despite some fairly compelling evidence to the contrary.

Goodell delayed a decision on any discipline for Robert Kraft, owner of the Patriots, for his alleged participation in illegally solicited prostitution at a Florida massage parlor. When it was pointed out to Goodell that players will receive discipline before criminal cases go to trial and that they are not held to a criminal standard, Goodell blithely made a statement that all members of the NFL, from players to owners, are held to the same standard of conduct.

After charges were dropped because video evidence was ruled inadmissible in court, we have yet to see any discipline levied against Kraft. The same consideration was not given to Deshaun Watson after misconduct charges were dropped against him, or to Ezekiel Elliott after domestic violence allegations never developed into criminal allegations.

NFL suspended Irsay for only six games and fined $500,000 after he was arrested under suspicion of DUI and drug possession. Irsay pleaded guilty to one count of Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated. No further punishment was levied against Irsay when it was revealed that a close and possibly intimate associate of Irsay died of a drug overdose in a house purchased with Colts team money — not Irsay’s personal finances.


Roger Goodell Stays Out of Ownership Discipline for a Good Reason
Goodell is smart to stay out of the business of owners, despite being tasked explicitly with the job of being in their business. If Goodell does end up in a position to make a decision on Snyder, whether that’s discipline or something else, he will be immune to accusations of prejudice. Not only that, owners know that if Goodell helps Snyder in this situation, he will help them in any situation that arises for them.

Indeed, the ESPN report indicates that a genuine investigation with real consequences could result in similar investigations into the workplace cultures of the 31 other teams. There are no clean hands, it just so happens that Snyder’s hands look the dirtiest.

The process of acquiring a billion dollars worth of value is never a clean operation. Businesses that operate ethically put constraints upon themselves that unethical businesses do not have, and those businesses outcompete their ethical competitors, allowing them to crowd them out of markets, supply chains, and marketing opportunities — leading to shutdowns or buyouts.

Those who arrive at the top of this messy food chain end up with the means to acquire an NFL team. That’s who runs the NFL.

Goodell is an employee of those owners, put in the position of disciplining his bosses. He has two primary roles — to strike television deals and to make the lives of owners easier.


While his job description is more expansive, one that includes day-to-day administration of the NFL front office, interfacing with medical and legal experts to design league policy, leading in negotiations with the NFLPA, participating in player (and owner) discipline, and so on, the totality of his role is to make money and help ownership.

And one of the best ways to help ownership is to take the heat off of them. Goodell suffers the slings and arrows of the NFL-watching public and becomes the avatar by which fans vent their complaints, allowing owners to own at peace.

He is unpopular so that the owners don’t have to be.

The owners know it, which is why the owners voted 31-1 to open negotiations with Goodell for a new contract. Amidst one of the most scandal-filled NFL runs we’ve seen in some time, as the NFL sees one of its teams under multiple federal investigations, ownership seems prepared to give Goodell a raise on a contract that paid out $128 million over a two-year period.

The NFL Will Always Be Like This
That reward is just a demonstration of the nature of the relationship that owners have with the commissioner. It is structural to the NFL.

It is impossible to avoid, and the NFL will never conduct a satisfactory investigation until the problem becomes so large that it requires a literal act of Congress — the same body that could take away the NFL’s monopoly protection.


This filters down. Accountability becomes progressively harsher the further down the ladder we go in the NFL. It starts with a light touch on ownership, progresses to a heavier hand on the front office, and some additional discipline for coaches. The players receive the least amount of protection and put the most on the line to make sure the NFL is a viable product.

This is baked into the cake, and the owners oversee their own punishment mechanism. The only thing that gets them to move against their own is a threat to their pocketbook, not unethical or gross behavior.

The NFL might get rid of the Dan Snyder that runs the Washington Commanders, but they won’t get rid of any of the other Dan Snyders running NFL teams or the future Dan Snyders that they’ll invite into the club.

Arif Hasan is an NFL reporter and analyst for Pro Football Network. You can read all of Arif’s work here and follow him on Twitter: @ArifHasanNFL.

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfls-problems-deeper-than-dan-snyder/

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,322
Likes: 1344
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,322
Likes: 1344
j/c:



Tackles are tackles.
1 member likes this: PitDAWG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,322
Likes: 1344
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,322
Likes: 1344


Tackles are tackles.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 1808
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 1808
"Financial improprieties"? Is that what the rich people call paying for hookers and blow?


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
No, no, no! That's misappropriation of funds!


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275

1 member likes this: PitDAWG
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Good!

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275

3 members like this: PrplPplEater, PitDAWG, Versatile Dog
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,372
Likes: 995
Legend
Online
Legend
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,372
Likes: 995
Interesting right?

The holy NFL and their not so upstanding billionaire owners.

The best thing for the league is to force the sale.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,362
Likes: 1305
House Oversight Committee to end investigation into Dan Snyder

The Congressional investigation into Dan Snyder is coming to an end, as Republicans say they will drop the Oversight Committee's probe into Snyder once they take official control of the House in January. FOX 5's Tom Fitzgerald has the details.

https://sports.yahoo.com/house-oversight-committee-end-investigation-235934948.html

Speaking of protecting the billionaires club......


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,468
Likes: 1275
j/c...

Congress Slams Dan Snyder and the N.F.L. for Impeding Sexual Harassment Investigation

A congressional committee said the N.F.L. “has not protected workers from sexual harassment and abuse” and found that Snyder, the Commanders owner, went to great lengths to interfere in workplace inquiries.

By Ken Belson and Katherine Rosman
Dec. 8, 2022, 12:00 p.m. ET

The Washington Commanders owner Daniel Snyder, aided by N.F.L. Commissioner Roger Goodell, suppressed evidence that Snyder and team executives sexually harassed women who worked at the team over two decades, according to the results of a yearlong inquiry by the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.

In a 74-page report released Thursday, the committee said Snyder went to extraordinary lengths to stall investigations into him and his team. The efforts, the report said, included his attempt to pay former employees “hush money” to not discuss their experiences, the refusal to release one woman from her nondisclosure agreement after she settled a sexual misconduct claim against Snyder for $1.6 million, and the use of private investigators and leaked emails to intimidate former employees from participating in interviews.

The report also chastised the N.F.L. for failing to prevent Snyder from interfering with its investigation of harassment claims and for not appropriately addressing Snyder’s conduct.

At the end of the league’s investigation, Snyder and the team’s lawyers were allowed to negotiate the team’s $10 million penalty directly with the league, rather than leave the decision to the N.F.L.’s executive committee as is standard, and pay the fine in a way that may have provided the team a tax benefit, the report said.

The N.F.L.’s recommendations for reforming the Commanders, the report said, also “bore a striking resemblance” to those that stemmed from the N.B.A.’s 2018 internal investigation of workplace misconduct at the Dallas Mavericks, suggesting that the N.F.L. did little more than copy another league’s homework.

“The committee’s investigation shows that the N.F.L. has not protected workers from sexual harassment and abuse, has failed to ensure victims can speak up without fear of retaliation, and has not sought true accountability for those responsible, even after decades of misconduct,” the committee concluded in its report.


Jean Medina, a spokeswoman for the Commanders, did not respond to specific questions about the allegations against Snyder. Instead, she forwarded memo written by Republican committee members Wednesday night which called the committee’s investigation a “sham” intended to harass a private business and depose its owner.

“Committee Democrats have spent invaluable Committee time and resources investigating a private business that has already been investigated and held accountable,” the letter said.

A spokesman for the N.F.L. declined to comment until the league had the chance to review the report.

Much of what is included in the committee’s report substantiated previous reporting by The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and the committee itself, which released interim reports this year. One of the interim reports documented the so-called shadow investigation Snyder directed to obstruct the league’s inquiry.

Thursday’s report included excerpts from an 11-hour deposition Snyder gave under oath in July in which he “testified over 100 times that he did not know or could not recall basic facts about his role as owner of the Commanders.”

The report also showed that the day before the committee deposed Allen, the former Washington team president, Snyder submitted “embarrassing” and “inappropriate” emails that Allen sent while he worked for the team. The report concluded that this was done as part of Snyder’s broader effort to intimidate witnesses.

The Republicans’ memo said the committee had ignored Allen’s own role in creating a hostile work environment at the club. Allen was fired by Snyder in December 2019.

The committee said that Snyder used information that his lawyers collected on victims, witnesses and journalists in an effort to harass and discredit former employees. That data included their social media activity and phone records.

Lisa Banks and Debra Katz, lawyers for many of the women who raised harassment complaints, lauded the congressional report for “creating a public record of what had been hidden for decades,” adding that they looked forward to “a full and truthful reporting” of the N.F.L.’s investigation into allegations related to Snyder’s conduct and financial improprieties at the team.

The report was released just weeks before Republicans will assume control of the House and its committees on Jan. 3. Shortly after most of the midterm races were decided in November, the incoming chair of the committee, Representative James Comer, Republican of Kentucky, announced that the inquiry into the Commanders’ workplace culture would end.

Comer, through a spokesperson, declined to comment.

Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, Democrat of New York, who has chaired the committee since 2019 and oversaw the investigation into Snyder and the Commanders, was beaten in a primary race earlier this year.

It was unclear what next steps could be taken as a result of the report, though Maloney said she was confident that it would have implications “not just for the N.F.L. — but all of corporate America,” citing two pieces of legislation she has proposed about nondisclosure agreements and abuse of employee images.

“I am also pleased by reports that the findings of our investigation have sparked multiple additional inquiries,” Maloney said. “And I imagine our report will further inform those efforts.”

The report comes as Snyder faces open investigations of workplace culture and financial improprieties at the team, including those led by the attorneys general of Virginia and the District of Columbia, and by the N.F.L. The mounting scrutiny of Snyder and the league prompted one of Snyder’s peers, the Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay, to say publicly that he should be forced out of the N.F.L., a move that would require the support of at least 24 of the league’s 32 team owners.

While the league’s other team owners have grumbled privately about Snyder, several owners, speaking on the condition of anonymity, have told The New York Times that they would be reluctant to force a sale because it would set a precedent that could be used against them.

Last month, Snyder, whose wife, Tanya, is co-owner of the Commanders, hired bankers to explore various options for selling some or all of the franchise, which has been valued at $5.6 billion.

A Toxic Environment

The troubles at the team came to a head in July 2020 when The Washington Post published a story detailing the toxic environment at the club, citing interviews with more than a dozen women who said they were sexually harassed while working there. Snyder hired Beth Wilkinson, a Washington-based lawyer, to investigate the allegations, but the league took over oversight.

Wilkinson was initially asked to prepare a written report at the end of the investigation and prepared written evidence as part of four status briefings to the league while the investigation was in progress, according to the committee’s report. Goodell decided in October 2020 to have her present her final findings only verbally.

In November 2020, the Commanders’ former general counsel sued to block Wilkinson from using nonpublic documents that implicated Snyder in paying a settlement in 2009 to a former team employee who accused him of sexual misconduct during a flight on his private jet.

The team, the committee said, did not report the nature of the former employee’s allegations to the N.F.L. until 2020, during the league’s investigation, and the team refused to release her from a nondisclosure agreement in an attempt to prevent her from speaking about the incident to investigators, though she eventually did.

When Wilkinson’s investigation concluded in July 2021, the N.F.L. released only a brief summary of the inquiry’s findings. The league claimed that the decision was made to protect the privacy of some of the former team employees who spoke to Wilkinson.

Goodell concluded the league’s inquiry by releasing a statement saying that Wilkinson had found that for many years the workplace environment at the team, particularly for women, was “highly unprofessional” and that employees were bullied and intimidated amid a culture of fear. Numerous female employees, Goodell said, were sexually harassed.

The N.F.L. fined the team and Snyder agreed to relinquish day-to-day control for at least a year.

After several of the women who came forward with sexual harassment allegations accused the N.F.L. of covering up evidence incriminating Snyder and his team, the congressional committee began its own inquiry in October 2021.

As the committee attempted to look into conduct at the team, the report says, “the league, working closely with the Commanders through a previously undisclosed common interest agreement, refused to produce more than 40,000 responsive documents, including the findings of the Wilkinson investigation and materials from Ms. Wilkinson’s files.”

The report released Thursday included numerous allegations that were made by former employees during the Wilkinson investigation, many of which had been revealed in articles published by The New York Times in 2018 and The Washington Post in 2020.

One male former employee said that team executives told him to produce a video for Snyder that included lewd outtakes from a photo shoot where the team’s cheerleaders were required to pose topless, and that Snyder was aware that some team sponsors had been allowed to attend the shoot. The women who worked as cheerleaders had not consented to the use of the footage or the presence of sponsors.

During the congressional inquiry, former employees made new claims directly against Snyder. Speaking at a committee round table, Tiffani Johnston, a former marketing and events coordinator for the team, said that at a work dinner in either 2005 or 2006, she sat next to Snyder, who put his hand on her thigh under the table. Later that night, she said, she resisted Snyder’s attempt to push her toward his limousine.

Melanie Coburn, a former cheerleader and director of marketing, told the committee in February that Snyder hosted a work event at his Aspen, Colo., home, for which team executives hired prostitutes.

The N.F.L.’s Second Investigation

The allegations from the February hearing prompted the N.F.L. to start its second investigation into Snyder and the team. It is being led by Mary Jo White, a former Securities and Exchange Commission chair and federal prosecutor. The league said there was no timetable for White to conclude her report.

Several former employees testified to Congress that Snyder, when told that female staff members complained of being harassed by male co-workers, did nothing to address the problems, and even defended one of the men.

Snyder, witnesses said, “endorsed a toxic culture at the Commanders in which sexual misconduct, exploitation of women, bullying of men, and other inappropriate behavior was commonplace, and that he was a hands-on owner who had a role in nearly every organizational decision,” the committee wrote in Thursday’s report. “As one witness confirmed, Mr. Snyder ‘created a culture where this behavior was accepted and encouraged.’”

The committee also said that the N.F.L. warned Snyder to cooperate with the Wilkinson investigation as early as August 2020, but that the league did not step in to prevent Snyder from obstructing former employees from being interviewed. The league, it said, was made aware that Snyder was trying to intimidate former employees, and failed to stop him from doing so.

Allen told the committee Snyder used some of his emails to gain advantage in other litigation. Allen said he reported this to the N.F.L.’s special counsel for investigations, Lisa Friel, who told him Snyder’s use of the emails was “conduct detrimental to the league,” a punishable offense.

Snyder and Goodell were both called by the committee to testify in early June. While Goodell agreed to provide virtual testimony three weeks later, it took nearly two months and the threat of a congressional subpoena before Snyder’s lawyers agreed to terms that resulted in Snyder’s virtual appearance and testimony under oath, which he provided in late July.

The committee concluded that the league does not have oversight into how its teams manage sexual harassment complaints, leaving teams to investigate rather than notifying the league office of potential workplace violations. The existing protocol, the committee said, runs counter to the recommendation made in 2018 by White after she advised the N.F.L. as it investigated allegations of domestic violence made against Dallas Cowboys’ running back Ezekiel Elliott.

“The N.F.L.’s ongoing failure to take workplace misconduct seriously is compounded by its own policies that are designed to protect the interests of club owners,” the committee’s report said.

The committee also took issue with the N.F.L.’s failure to appropriately penalize Snyder, citing that even after his suspension he was allowed to continue to work on the team’s two biggest economic initiatives: its rebranding and the push for a new stadium. He has also shown up to the team’s games, though not to N.F.L. owners meetings, instead leaving Tanya Snyder to represent them.

In October, Daniel Snyder told a Washington-area radio station that his restrictions were lifted and Commanders team lawyers said that Snyder was back to running the team.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/08/sports/football/congress-commanders-investigation-dan-snyder.html

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Dan Snyder to "Blow Up" the NFL

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5