Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#1997505 01/05/23 02:05 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,607
Likes: 239
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,607
Likes: 239


Blocking those who argue to argue, eliminates the argument.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,406
Likes: 1365
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,406
Likes: 1365
j/c:



Tackles are tackles.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
I feel bad for Woods.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,506
Likes: 1282
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,506
Likes: 1282
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
j/c:


After seeing this, I say there is a 70% chance Woods is back next year.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,850
Likes: 952
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18,850
Likes: 952
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
I feel bad for Woods.

I do too, but he still needs to go.


And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
- John Muir

#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,654
Likes: 510
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,654
Likes: 510
The annoying thing is that our defense has ended the year very well the past few seasons, but it’s just that we start out so poorly that it’s too late


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
We did not start off poorly last year. That is a fallacy. Again, we gave up 6 points in game 3 and 7 points in game 4. We were 3 and 1 after 4 games. I might have the 6 and 7 point order wrong, but those were the points allowed in those two games. Don't want to be labeled as a liar again. LOL

Last edited by Versatile Dog; 01/05/23 01:32 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,682
Likes: 386
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,682
Likes: 386
I wonder what our 3rd down efficiency looks like. Seemed like we struggled getting off the field at times this year in critical situations.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1836
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1836
Originally Posted by PortlandDawg
I wonder what our 3rd down efficiency looks like. Seemed like we struggled getting off the field at times this year in critical situations.

I was going to bring this up but have been too busy to check the actual stats.

To my eyes, our biggest problem this year... on both sides of the ball is getting off and staying on the field. Ongoing, game after game, never do the stars seem to align to the point of both things becoming positives in the same game.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
FATE #1997606 01/05/23 02:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
I will look later, but I believe our 3rd down efficiency was poor on defense and decent on offense, especially before Watson got back. I could be wrong, though.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1836
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1836
That sounds about right. I think I'm staring down the barrel of the last few games as far as my offensive frustration.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
We were 20th on offense at 37.9% on 3rd down efficiency. We are at 38.1% in our last three games.

We are actually 10th on defense at 38.0%. We are higher at in our last 3 games at 44.19%, which makes sense since we gave up a bunch of them at the end of the first half against Washington.

We are 9th overall on offense for converting 4th downs at 55.0%.

We are tied w/the Eagles for the most 4th down conversions w/22 successful attempts.

FATE #1997611 01/05/23 02:29 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Originally Posted by FATE
That sounds about right. I think I'm staring down the barrel of the last few games as far as my offensive frustration.

I was actually wrong.....LOL

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,493
Likes: 146
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,493
Likes: 146
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
I feel bad for Woods.

You are, what your record says you are..!

In Woods case, his inability to make defensive changes at the time they needed to be made, might have cost him his job..!

If there are circumstances that affected Woods ability to make timely changes and adjustments, it is up to Woods or someone else in the franchise chain of command to point those factors out, in support of Woods.

The Browns offense under Stefanski suffered the same issues...not making adjustments soon enough to impact the outcome of games, leading to losses that had little to do with the talent on the field...but a lack of coaching talent that was experienced enough to recognize what adjustments needed to be made "DURING THE GAME"...and not wait to discuss the need for those adjustments with others in the franchise until after the game in question, is already lost..!

Talking about what went wrong after game is over and lost...IT'S WORTHLESS ADVISE..!

Offensive and defensive coordinators should have a free hand to make whatever changes and adjustment they feel are necessary to win a game. NO ONE should be looking over a coach or coordinator's shoulder, attempting to adjust a game plan, UNLESS THE COACHES AND COORDINATORS ASK FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE.

jmfo...mac

Last edited by mac; 01/05/23 02:40 PM.



Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
mac #1997614 01/05/23 02:39 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,810
Likes: 1348
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,810
Likes: 1348
I find this very odd. There are certain posters that claim that Woods defense was better than most people thought it was in 2021. That would seem to indicate that the total collapse of this defense during the first half of this season is even worse than people seem to be indicating. Actually I tend to agree with that.

I don't think it's a bad thing to feel sorry for him on a personal level. But on a professional level there is no reason what so ever.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
PitDAWG #1997624 01/05/23 03:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,493
Likes: 146
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,493
Likes: 146
pit...if Woods wants to fall on his sword and accept the criticism, if he is fired...that is his decision.






Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
mac #1997629 01/05/23 03:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,810
Likes: 1348
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,810
Likes: 1348
I have no idea what that has to do with my post.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,984
Likes: 361
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,984
Likes: 361
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
We did not start off poorly last year. That is a fallacy. Again, we gave up 6 points in game 3 and 7 points in game 4. We were 3 and 1 after 4 games. I might have the 6 and 7 point order wrong, but those were the points allowed in those two games. Don't want to be labeled as a liar again. LOL

Last year, by game, we allowed:

33
21
6 (this was the hapless Bears, who went 3-13, scoring only 18.3 per game)
7
47
37
14
15
16
45
10
16
22
16
24
26
16

People fan make of the numbers what they will.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
1 member likes this: PrplPplEater
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Thanks, but if you are going to clarify the Bears, why not mention KC and LAC?

Once again, it did NOT take half the season before we played some good defense.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,984
Likes: 361
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 49,984
Likes: 361
I would say that we were up and down a lot last year. IMHO, of course.


Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.

John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
1 member likes this: Versatile Dog
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,670
Likes: 673
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,670
Likes: 673
Here is how I feel about our D. Woods has a history of starting slow, and I think that is an issue. Maybe our biggest. We need to upgrade the situation, but not sure Woods needs to go. It would be better, IMHO, to get Ski more involved on the D side, and maybe bring in an assistant DC capable of taking the reins to light a fire under Woods early. I don't know what is best, but it needs to be addressed. Also, the run D needs an overhaul.


Your feelings and opinions do not add up to facts.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,323
Likes: 250
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,323
Likes: 250


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,323
Likes: 250
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,323
Likes: 250


#gmstrong
Pdawg #1997711 01/05/23 10:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1836
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 11,333
Likes: 1836
Buh-bye.

This started, played out, and ended just about the way I thought it would. Smart? Maybe. Tough? Nope. Accountable? You just read it...

Let's start purging all the "me" guys... especially the ones that are only available when they see fit to bless us with their presence.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
1 member likes this: Hammer
FATE #1997713 01/05/23 10:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,750
Likes: 396
R
Legend
Offline
Legend
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16,750
Likes: 396
This is a culture hit piece. Culture starts at the top and trickles down to the players. The Browns don't have any culture setters. They are a team devoid of leadership starting with Haslam to Depo to Berry to Stefanski to the players.

There is no light at the end of this tunnel because most of those people will still be here.

FATE #1997717 01/05/23 11:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,323
Likes: 250
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,323
Likes: 250
To me he is basically saying it’s Woods or me. I say no to both. Choosing to only play on third downs is pathetic.


#gmstrong
Rishuz #1997721 01/05/23 11:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,506
Likes: 1282
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,506
Likes: 1282
Originally Posted by Rishuz
This is a culture hit piece. Culture starts at the top and trickles down to the players. The Browns don't have any culture setters. They are a team devoid of leadership starting with Haslam to Depo to Berry to Stefanski to the players.

The culture has been and continues to be a problem under the Haslam ownership. Add this to the laundry list of further evidence. It's always something.

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,506
Likes: 1282
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,506
Likes: 1282
Originally Posted by Milk Man
Originally Posted by Rishuz
This is a culture hit piece. Culture starts at the top and trickles down to the players. The Browns don't have any culture setters. They are a team devoid of leadership starting with Haslam to Depo to Berry to Stefanski to the players.

The culture has been and continues to be a problem under the Haslam ownership. Add this to the laundry list of further evidence. It's always something.

To add to my own post... this is an opportunity to send a message that speaking out like this publicly has consequences.

Demonstrate leadership and make Clowney inactive for the final game. Nobody should be bigger than the team and he should not be rewarded with playing time.

You're not happy with the situation? Keep it in house and discuss during the end of season exit interview.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,269
Likes: 168
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,269
Likes: 168
The defense is average and could use some DT’s that push the pocket and linebackers with speed and size.


There will be no playoffs. Can’t play with who we have out there and compounding it with garbage playcalling and worse execution. We don’t have good skill players on offense period. Browns 20 - Bears 17.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 261
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 261
Originally Posted by PortlandDawg
I wonder what our 3rd down efficiency looks like. Seemed like we struggled getting off the field at times this year in critical situations.
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
I will look later, but I believe our 3rd down efficiency was poor on defense and decent on offense, especially before Watson got back. I could be wrong, though.


Here's how the Browns have done in 2022 vs 2021. If you look at the various categories, there is minimal change from 2021 to 2022. I've highlighted the areas of regression from 2021 to 2022.

Browns Defense 2021 vs 2022 w/ranking
Yards per game: 2021: 5th @ 311.5 yds per game - 2022: 11th @ 331.1 yds per game
Rushing yds per game: 2021: 12th @ 109.2 yds per game - 2022: 25th @ 134.4 yds per game
Rushing yds per attempt: 2021: 10th @ 4.2 yds per attempt - 2022: 25th @ 4.8 yds per attempt
Passing yds per game: 2021: 5th @ 202.3 yds per game - 2022: 7th @ 196.7 yds per game
QBR: 2021: 13th @ 89.4 - 2022: 10th @ 85.5
Sacks: 2021: 10th @ 43 - 2022: 24th at 33
3rd Down Pct: 2021: 13th @ 39.3% - 2022: 10th @ 38.0%
Points per game: 2021: 13th @ 21.8 points per game - 2022: 19th @ 22.1 points per game

Browns Offense 2021 vs 2022 w/ranking
Yards per game: 2021: 18th @ 340.6 yds per game - 2022: 14th @ 351.7 yds per game
Rushing yds per game: 2021: 4th @ 145.4 yds per game - 2022: 6th @ 147.2 yds per game
Rushing yds per attempt: 2021: 2nd @ 5.1 yds per attempt - 2022: 12th @ 4.6 yds per attempt
Passing yds per game: 2021: 27th @ 195.3 yds per game - 2022: 22nd @ 204.4 yds per game
QBR: 2021: 26th @ 84.6 - 2022: 22nd @ 84.9
Sacks: 2021: 27th @ 49 - 2022: 15th @ 37
3rd Down Pct: 2021: 17th @ 39.2% - 2022: 20th @ 37.9%
Points per game: 2021: 20th @ 20.5 points per game - 2022: 16th @ 21.7 points per gam


Just "KICKING THAT CAN DOWN the ROAD"
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 261
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 261
To answer the question, the Browns are actually better in 2022 than 2021 in defensive 3rd down efficiency and worse in 2022 than 2021 in offensive 3rd down efficiency.


Just "KICKING THAT CAN DOWN the ROAD"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,579
Likes: 815
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,579
Likes: 815
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
I feel bad for Woods.

I do as well. He had the look of a dead man walking.

That said, most times you make the bed you sleep in. Either through a poor scheme or the ability to bring the scheme together, it is what it is, and I do understand that sometimes it is the players inability that can sink a coach.

I don't see any way the team, or the Haslams are going to be good if some people think it is a good idea to go with Joe Woods for another season to see how things work out. We can't keep going through seasons where it takes the team 6-7 games before the D starts to gel.

Stefanski is going to have to make that change, and if he doesn't agree, he is going to have to walk that plank along with Woods.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 261
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 261
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
I feel bad for Woods.

I do as well. He had the look of a dead man walking.

That said, most times you make the bed you sleep in. Either through a poor scheme or the ability to bring the scheme together, it is what it is, and I do understand that sometimes it is the players inability that can sink a coach.

I don't see any way the team, or the Haslams are going to be good if some people think it is a good idea to go with Joe Woods for another season to see how things work out. We can't keep going through seasons where it takes the team 6-7 games before the D starts to gel.

Stefanski is going to have to make that change, and if he doesn't agree, he is going to have to walk that plank along with Woods.

The other elephant in the room is the reports that Stefanski has to have post game meetings and pregame meetings for approval of game plans with Depo, Berry and Haslam. If true, it hasn't been reputed, then what quality of DC can the Browns get knowing their game plans will be challenged every week by the analytics team? It certainly appears the Browns have a puppet HC, finding a quality DC that must agree to being a part of a puppet management structure also will be difficult to find. IMHO, the question is and has been, who's in charge of deciding what the team is running offensively and defensively on a weekly basis? With the factual continued regression of the team over the last 3-years, what DC will want to come to the Browns if their decision-making process has to have approval from the analytics team? Candidly speaking, it hasn't exactly paid very good dividends the last 3-years with a Super Bowl contending team having never finished higher than 3rd placer in the AFC North under Stefanski.


Just "KICKING THAT CAN DOWN the ROAD"
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 261
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 261
Originally Posted by Milk Man
Originally Posted by Milk Man
Originally Posted by Rishuz
This is a culture hit piece. Culture starts at the top and trickles down to the players. The Browns don't have any culture setters. They are a team devoid of leadership starting with Haslam to Depo to Berry to Stefanski to the players.

The culture has been and continues to be a problem under the Haslam ownership. Add this to the laundry list of further evidence. It's always something.

To add to my own post... this is an opportunity to send a message that speaking out like this publicly has consequences.

Demonstrate leadership and make Clowney inactive for the final game. Nobody should be bigger than the team and he should not be rewarded with playing time.

You're not happy with the situation? Keep it in house and discuss during the end of season exit interview.

It's also a cap hit because of the structure Berry put in place. Clowney might be gone starting next year but he's on the books as a cap hit for the next 4-years.

Year________Salary________Prorated Bonus__________Dead Money
2023________Void_________$1,600,000_____________$6,400,000
2024________Void_________$1,600,000_____________$4,800,000
2025________Void_________$1,600,000_____________$3,200,000
2026________Void_________$1,600,000_____________$1,600,000


Just "KICKING THAT CAN DOWN the ROAD"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,579
Likes: 815
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 38,579
Likes: 815
Originally Posted by steve0255
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by Versatile Dog
I feel bad for Woods.

I do as well. He had the look of a dead man walking.

That said, most times you make the bed you sleep in. Either through a poor scheme or the ability to bring the scheme together, it is what it is, and I do understand that sometimes it is the players inability that can sink a coach.

I don't see any way the team, or the Haslams are going to be good if some people think it is a good idea to go with Joe Woods for another season to see how things work out. We can't keep going through seasons where it takes the team 6-7 games before the D starts to gel.

Stefanski is going to have to make that change, and if he doesn't agree, he is going to have to walk that plank along with Woods.

The other elephant in the room is the reports that Stefanski has to have post game meetings and pregame meetings for approval of game plans with Depo, Berry and Haslam. If true, it hasn't been reputed, then what quality of DC can the Browns get knowing their game plans will be challenged every week by the analytics team? It certainly appears the Browns have a puppet HC, finding a quality DC that must agree to being a part of a puppet management structure also will be difficult to find. IMHO, the question is and has been, who's in charge of deciding what the team is running offensively and defensively on a weekly basis? With the factual continued regression of the team over the last 3-years, what DC will want to come to the Browns if their decision-making process has to have approval from the analytics team? Candidly speaking, it hasn't exactly paid very good dividends the last 3-years with a Super Bowl contending team having never finished higher than 3rd placer in the AFC North under Stefanski.

That is your op-ed. I don't know how much others have to approve the gameplans.

Lot's of things can be reported. Some are true, some are false, and IMO most are somewhat true and blown far out of context.

You and others sound a bit crazed and think Depo is somewhat like the Wizard of Oz standing behind some curtain pulling levers and pushing buttons.

Is analytics used to help form the gameplan? I hope so. Does Depo have to give his stamp of approval? That's hogwash.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
2 members like this: FATE, Hammer
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
I actually posted the offensive and defensive efficiency numbers for this year in the post that followed the one you quoted. This is not to argue, but you can take a look if you want.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Originally Posted by YTownBrownsFan
I would say that we were up and down a lot last year. IMHO, of course.

I definitely agree w/that.

Pdawg #1997750 01/06/23 09:49 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Originally Posted by Pdawg



Clowney has always been a selfish and unmotivated player. I saw it close-up when he played for the Gamecocks here in Columbia, SC. He had a rep of not wanting to practice, taking himself off the field, sitting out, etc. That has continued in the NFL. He was/is an incredibly talented physical specimen. He has never been dependable and has bounced around the league. When he came here, he talked of playing on a team w/a winning record and then didn't even know if his last team--the Titans--had a winning record or not. He's an overpaid mercenary at this point in time.

Now, he's complaining about Myles being put in desirable situations? LMAO........maybe because it's that Myles is more of a warrior, is more dependable, plays harder, and produces more. You chose to not give your best to the game. Deal w/it.

I did not want the guy back before he made these comments, so I'm glad he punched his ticket out of town. He's not dependable.

1 member likes this: FATE
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,493
Likes: 146
M
mac Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13,493
Likes: 146
Clowney knows damn well he didn't play up to his potential and now that his seasons is almost over he's left with "making excuses"..!

Clowney had opportunities to make a allot of big plays and simply failed to cash in on those.




Home of the Free, Because of the Brave...
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,506
Likes: 1282
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,506
Likes: 1282
j/c…

Good.


1 member likes this: Versatile Dog
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns Defense

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5