DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo

I've explained throughout the thread that it depends on the ruling. Try to keep up.

Not really you've doomed and gloomed through this thread.

"So even more unbridled capitalism? Restrict and block even more checks and balances?" <=-- Your first prediction. I see no qualifier on your prediction.

It isn't hard keeping up with you when you are constantly stalled.

Mmmmm hmmmm. And you talk about things being too complicated for me?

Because they typically are.

Not at all. I would explain it to you but you still wouldn't get it.

SO i quote your words and you continue to tell me you said something else. Seems like that happens a lot. Again, you know there is a record of what you said, right? This isn't new to you?

Not for nothing, but I'm at a point that I won't ever trust SCOTUS again. Well, at least not Thomas and Roberts...

What do you do when they are on opposite sides?

LOL....he still hates them.

I have repeatedly said "depending on the outcome of the case" and "it could lead to" throughout the thread. As I stated, I realize you don't understand. Actually you do. You just like to fight.

Upon review of the record, you know what is posted, no you didn't "repeatedly" say "depending on the outcome of the case" . You still don't understand that anyone can review the posts from earlier in the thread. You might have thought it repeatedly, but you didn't say it repeatedly.

Now where ya gonna stick those goal posts?

Up your...... never mind.

Today SCOTUS published orders from the 6/15 conference:


Justice Jackson has recused herself. Otherwise this is administrative and nothing really to argue about.