Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455
Likes: 1319
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455
Likes: 1319
You had already taken it off topic with "mah guns!" Try and pay attention. And of course deflection is all you have.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
You had already taken it off topic with "mah guns!" Try and pay attention. And of course deflection is all you have.


Of course it was quite on topic until you woke up today.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455
Likes: 1319
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455
Likes: 1319
It my most satirical voice..... Well of course it was. So it's just like when you are the only one that complains about something I post? Interesting....


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
It my most satirical voice..... Well of course it was. So it's just like when you are the only one that complains about something I post? Interesting....

So you are just here to fight. Got it.

Last edited by FrankZ; 05/19/23 03:28 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455
Likes: 1319
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455
Likes: 1319
Originally Posted by FrankZ
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
It my most satirical voice..... Well of course it was. So it's just like when you are the only one that complains about something I post? Interesting....

So you are just here to fight. Got it.


So when I do exactly what you do, your claim is I'm only here to fight. Interesting.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Originally Posted by FrankZ
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
It my most satirical voice..... Well of course it was. So it's just like when you are the only one that complains about something I post? Interesting....

So you are just here to fight. Got it.


So when I do exactly what you do, your claim is I'm only here to fight. Interesting.

I posted quite a bit of discussion on this thread, you've posted nothing but fights. So no, you didn't do what I do, you did what you do. You show up and fight, then blame it on someone else.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455
Likes: 1319
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455
Likes: 1319
You do know the exact same thing could be said about several threads where I provided quite a bit of discussion in the threads where you came into them and you did the exact same thing. Do you have an address where I should send your mirror to?


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,590
Likes: 238
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,590
Likes: 238
Originally Posted by FrankZ
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
Originally Posted by FrankZ
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
Originally Posted by FrankZ
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
FCC doesn't control the internet.... hence the rub. Montana has the power on this one.


Quote
The Federal Communications Commission regulates interstate and international communications through cable, radio, television, satellite and wire. The goal of the Commission is to promote connectivity and ensure a robust and competitive market.

It seems it is part of what they do.

100% inaccurate. Most people don’t know that though.

https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/fcc-and-speech#:~:text=The%20FCC%20does%20not%20regulate,restraints%20and%20obligations%20on%20broadcasters.


The FCC does not regulate any online content.

The FCC controls distribution methods and communications. If they aren't involved the FTC could be. They do have say in content.

How does Montana expect to make this happen?

FTC only deals with trade. They don't control access or content just making sure things are fair and not deceptive.

Montana seems to be well within their rights to make this happen and I would expect other states will follow suit one way or a variation of how Montana did it.

The FTC controls COPA. And banning TikTok is banning commerce.

Montana won't win this in court. If nothing else that pesky 1A will get in the way.

don't have time to reply in depth. running out the door. But... no. FTC ONLY deals with trade/deceptive practices marketing tactics etc.

TikTok doesn't sell anything. They are a social channel.


Blocking those who argue to argue, eliminates the argument.
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
don't have time to reply in depth. running out the door. But... no. FTC ONLY deals with trade/deceptive practices marketing tactics etc.

TikTok doesn't sell anything. They are a social channel.

The FTC is in charge of COPA it seems, which is content driven.

So from a how Montana could accomplish this I see a few options.

1) Layer 7 firewalls at NAPs inside MT a la China and their content filtering. This would involve the FCC since it would be in charge of the network at Layer 1. This likely would be ineffective even if they could get these devices installed.

2) Create laws that specifically target TikTok as a business and make it illegal to do business in MT based on those laws and business practices. This would likely need to be so narrowly crafted it to ony target TikTok it would be ineffective. Simple business practice changes could invalidate it. If they specifically name TikTok there would be a 14A challenge to it, if the FTC doesn't step in. This also implicates interstate commerce, and so Congress could get involved as well.

3) Make TikTok illegal to residents. This would be blatant censorship and would involve 1A and 14A challenges. No way this passes muster and would likely be enjoined before the ink is dry from signing it.

It would be interesting to see how they attempt it, but the chances of something like the surviving is negligible.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,398
Likes: 280
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,398
Likes: 280
I wish Jules was here so we could rail on about the "slippery slope" but where does this end? If a state can come up with reasons to ban tiktok over some perceived fear of "China", then surely they can come up with reasons to ban Fox News or MSNBC or Youtube or porn sites or the NRA or any host of other things they might view as "for the public good"....


yebat' Putin
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,846
Likes: 110
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,846
Likes: 110
Kinda ironic that republicans have an open season on banning many of our freedoms these days. Of course, not on those pesky military assault rifles. No way.


A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives.
– Jackie Robinson
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,590
Likes: 238
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,590
Likes: 238
Originally Posted by FrankZ
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
don't have time to reply in depth. running out the door. But... no. FTC ONLY deals with trade/deceptive practices marketing tactics etc.

TikTok doesn't sell anything. They are a social channel.

The FTC is in charge of COPA it seems, which is content driven.

So from a how Montana could accomplish this I see a few options.

1) Layer 7 firewalls at NAPs inside MT a la China and their content filtering. This would involve the FCC since it would be in charge of the network at Layer 1. This likely would be ineffective even if they could get these devices installed.

2) Create laws that specifically target TikTok as a business and make it illegal to do business in MT based on those laws and business practices. This would likely need to be so narrowly crafted it to ony target TikTok it would be ineffective. Simple business practice changes could invalidate it. If they specifically name TikTok there would be a 14A challenge to it, if the FTC doesn't step in. This also implicates interstate commerce, and so Congress could get involved as well.

3) Make TikTok illegal to residents. This would be blatant censorship and would involve 1A and 14A challenges. No way this passes muster and would likely be enjoined before the ink is dry from signing it.

It would be interesting to see how they attempt it, but the chances of something like the surviving is negligible.

i encourage you to read the law they are passing and you are going to be like... ohhhh

I think you talking about COPPA laws? Yes, it's illegal to data mine or target & market children under the age of 13. I always thought that law should have been 18. JMHO

Montana doesn't have to do anything except enforce it.

The app stores have to block anyone in the state of Montana from downloading the app.


Blocking those who argue to argue, eliminates the argument.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,846
Likes: 110
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,846
Likes: 110
Quote
Montana doesn't have to do anything except enforce it.

The app stores have to block anyone in the state of Montana from downloading the app.

And that’s just it. Anyone with digital savvy will still be able to download and use the app. Montana will need to shut down much of the general public’s internet access to completely cut off access to an app.


A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives.
– Jackie Robinson
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
Originally Posted by FrankZ
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
don't have time to reply in depth. running out the door. But... no. FTC ONLY deals with trade/deceptive practices marketing tactics etc.

TikTok doesn't sell anything. They are a social channel.

The FTC is in charge of COPA it seems, which is content driven.

So from a how Montana could accomplish this I see a few options.

1) Layer 7 firewalls at NAPs inside MT a la China and their content filtering. This would involve the FCC since it would be in charge of the network at Layer 1. This likely would be ineffective even if they could get these devices installed.

2) Create laws that specifically target TikTok as a business and make it illegal to do business in MT based on those laws and business practices. This would likely need to be so narrowly crafted it to ony target TikTok it would be ineffective. Simple business practice changes could invalidate it. If they specifically name TikTok there would be a 14A challenge to it, if the FTC doesn't step in. This also implicates interstate commerce, and so Congress could get involved as well.

3) Make TikTok illegal to residents. This would be blatant censorship and would involve 1A and 14A challenges. No way this passes muster and would likely be enjoined before the ink is dry from signing it.

It would be interesting to see how they attempt it, but the chances of something like the surviving is negligible.

i encourage you to read the law they are passing and you are going to be like... ohhhh

I think you talking about COPPA laws? Yes, it's illegal to data mine or target & market children under the age of 13. I always thought that law should have been 18. JMHO

Montana doesn't have to do anything except enforce it.

The app stores have to block anyone in the state of Montana from downloading the app.

I had a read of SB419 (which I believe is the version sent and signed).

I don't see anything particularly clever in it, and I would be surprised if this survives a lawsuit. It does exempt users from penalty, which I suspect is solely designed to reduce the ability of users to have standing. As this deals with interstate and international commerce it will be an interesting one to watch.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455
Likes: 1319
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 67,455
Likes: 1319
TikTok sues Montana over state's ban of app

"We are challenging Montana's unconstitutional TikTok ban," the company said.

TikTok sued Montana in federal court on Monday over a ban of the app enacted by the state last week.

"We are challenging Montana's unconstitutional TikTok ban to protect our business and the hundreds of thousands of TikTok users in Montana," the company said in a statement. "We believe our legal challenge will prevail based on an exceedingly strong set of precedents and facts."

The office of Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte did not immediately respond to ABC News' request for comment.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court, alleges that the ban violates the First Amendment, arguing that the measure shuts down a "forum for speech for all speakers on the app," singling out TikTok users for "disfavored treatment."

Among a host of other challenges, TikTok said the ban is preempted by federal law because it is attempting to address an issue rooted in national security that is handled by the U.S. government.

The Montana ban, the first measure of its kind in the U.S., does not prevent current users from accessing the app or penalize them for doing so.

Instead, the ban targets the availability of the app by threatening entities such as TikTok, Google and Apple with a $10,000 fine for each day that the platform remains accessible in app stores for users in Montana.

The ban takes effect in January 2024.

TikTok serves hundreds of thousands of users in Montana and more than 5,000 businesses, TikTok spokesperson Brooke Oberwetter previously told ABC News.

State officials will be able to enforce the law by observing whether app stores display TikTok for users in Montana, and the relevant companies should be largely capable of identifying where users reside and denying access accordingly, experts previously said.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/tiktok-su...QSZuJmUQVje28j0PVcQVsGt7W6lBhl_GXU-xaOHs

I believe this was the expected result of Montana's ban.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,846
Likes: 110
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,846
Likes: 110
Yes as expected. Maybe they should just send this straight to the Supreme Court to save time and money. That’s where this issue is going to end up eventually anyways.


A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives.
– Jackie Robinson
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,954
Likes: 386
Originally Posted by PerfectSpiral
Yes as expected. Maybe they should just send this straight to the Supreme Court to save time and money. That’s where this issue is going to end up eventually anyways.

I can not see any way SCOTUS would accept this at this point. It will need to work the process, that is the way it works, even when it makes no sense or when it is obvious.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Montana governor bans TikTok

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5