|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109 |
Yes, that is basically what I am saying. I know for a fact that sometimes he is as innacurate as hell. But, I do see those throws where the ball is right on the money. IMO this is an issue that can be worked on. It tells me that with practice he will improve. We have all seen times where DA shows amazing accuracy and those times where he looks like Jim Sorgi. This means that if he can get his consistency down he could become one of the most accurate QB's in the game. His lack of consistency is without a doubt a weakness. The only positive I can get out of it is that he has his moments of amazing accuracy and that he can improve on his accuracy issues. It is all a matter of consitency with his footwork and form. It also seems to me that he is least accurate on the short, simple throws. So I guess you would say that he is accurate sometimes, but that is hardly a positive.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160 |
There are throws he's very good at ..but the ones in the short areas he's bad at.. Those throws that make our wideouts twist, turn , stretch out on...his completition % in the 1- 10 yard area is only 50% ...thats not great considering the small area of the field that is required to complete a pass..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,524
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,524 |
Well, once again we are merely speculating. Which really, can our FO do any more than that? All I think they, or we can do is sort out the positives and negatives, weigh their options and make a decision as how to move forward. Naturaly they have the inside scoop on practices, Quinns progress, etc... that we are not privy to. My main concern is that the very same problems that caused him to be a later round pick in the draft, are still VERY previlant in his game. Throwing into double and triple coverage, the "on again/off again" consistancy. While such problems are "more rare" with a good OL, they still persist. Even with good protection and a solid running game, you still see the "same old same old" to an extent. My main question is, after "three seasons in the NFL" how "much better" can he get? How much "better can his game be"? I don't have an answer to that question, but in most cases, you will see NFL QB's either overcome their weaknesses, or get tossed to the side for someone with the physical prowess who can. What I can say, is that "Savage knew DA". Savage also knew the talent and the weaknesses of DA. And while with a solid OL and a running game, DA didn't make the "critical mistakes as often", they are still very much a part of his game. With knowing this, it "appears" as though that Savage knew DA would never be "enough QB to take us to the promised land". After three years in the league, being a QB since he was a kid, how "much more" do you think he'll improve? Everyone has their "ceiling". A point they reach at which point they really "don't get much better". So I feel they will go with which ever QB they feel has "the higher ceiling". The "most potential for the long haul". Now we can "speculate" all we want. But I believe there's only "one reason" that Brady Quinn was drafted. That is because he has certain tangibles that no other QB here has/had. That his potential is far superior to anything we have/had. IMO, you must remember "why" coaches and GM's value high draft picks so much. Because the draft is WHERE YOU BUILD YOUR TEAM!I simply can not fathom Phil Savage drafting a QB so high with so much investment if he felt we had ANYTHING remotely close to his skill set and ceiling here already. And I really don't feel "inconsistant consistancy" has done anything to change that. But just as I said, it's all speculation........... 
Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,035
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 43,035 |
Quote:
My main question is, after "three seasons in the NFL" how "much better" can he get? How much "better can his game be"?
Yes, he's been in the league 3 years... yes, he's started 3 games last season and 15 games this season (10-8) That's 18 of a possible 48 plus any playoffs he may have missed with Baltimore..That works out to be one season and two games.
I'm completely convinced that it's just not fair to look at him like you would a 3 year STARTER...
To me that's every bit as bad as someone saying that RAC has been the HC for 3 seasons and his record sucks. (20-28) And saying it while thinking it doesn't matter what talent was on the team when he got here.
To me, neither argument makes a lick of sense... But that's just me.
Edit: forgot to add this:
Having said that that argument doesn't mean anything to me anyway, I agree that we Don't know if DA will get better..
All we have is some history to go by., Last year when started in place of Frye, he started out looking decent then went kinda down hill..
This year, he was much better so it was an improvement.. (being fair, he had much better protection) but improvement is improvement. if he's here and starting next season, he'll still have KW, BE, hopefully JL, and that line. I think improvement is possible. But I don't know that for sure.
Last edited by Damanshot; 01/07/08 07:38 PM.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109 |
I agree with you. We don't know if DA will get any better. If he can improve his decision making to the point of not throwing into triple coverage and not missing on those short throws so often he can be a good starting quarterback. I tend to believe that he can improve, I just don't know if he can improve enough that we can win a Super Bowl. What makes me tend to think that DA will improve is the fact that he has shown much growth throughout the season. I do however believe that BQ is the better option. I just think that we need to hold on to DA until we KNOW that BQ is the better option.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618 |
Quote:
I just think that we need to hold on to DA until we KNOW that BQ is the better option.
Well, these guys will beat you up if you speculate on DA being able to improve, but they can turn around and tell you that BQ is going to be a great QB w/out seeing him play in the NFL.
Here is a fact. NO ONE....AND I MEAN NO ONE..........knows how good or bad BQ will be as a QB in the NFL. It's pure speculation. And yes, I am including myself in that group.
I think that the coaches and the players know a lot more than we do. I'm going to trust their evaluation on this one. I just hope it isn't a situation like we had w/Timid....where the guy played because they had to justify his high draft status. That mistake ripped this franchise apart. I hope these guys are smarter than that. And I think they are.
"What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us." --Ralph Waldo Emerson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,764
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,764 |
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
*LOL* ... U wanna talk about revisionist history, there it is at its best ... SMELLY won the QB battle ... STUNK IT UP and then got hurt ... Timid then took over and played NO WORSE than SMELLY did ... neither of them played good but to say that it ripped the franchise apart is a JOKE ... the team STUNK and the QB play was only a small part of it but they were nothing to write home about ... SMELLY STUNK the year he started .... STUNK .. and then he went on to a real GREAT CAREER ....  this is NOTHING LIKE Timid and SMELLY .... nothing at all like it .. well except that like SMELLY ... DA may be a one year wonder ... BAD DECISIONS BY BOTCH RIPPED THAT TEAM APART .... that was 99% of the problem .. not the Smelly/Timid controversy ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618 |
"What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us." --Ralph Waldo Emerson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015 |
He did say his Nephew broke his glasses 
Couch could have ridden the bench for three years and not been marginally better. I don't think that situation can be related to this one, though I get your point.
Once they slap the tender on Anderson, BOTH QB's will cost some coin, so the "investment" put into Quinn won't really matter. If they decide Anderson is the guy, Quinn rides the bench this year then is traded. No big deal, not when one guy managed a decent season and the other shows plenty of promise.
Which leads me back to my belief that doing anything other than slapping the high tender on Anderson makes zero sense.
Now I gotta get back to watching OSU lose another national championship
***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy. Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,520 |
Is OSU playing ? 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188 |
Ya I can read just fine ... here's what u said ... Quote:
I think that the coaches and the players know a lot more than we do. I'm going to trust their evaluation on this one. I just hope it isn't a situation like we had w/Timid.... where the guy played because they had to justify his high draft status. That mistake ripped this franchise apart .
U said ... the decision to play Timid RIPPED THE FRANCHISE APART ... I said your FULL OF CRAP for saying that ...
would U care to elaborate on HOW PLAYING TIMID based on his draft status ripped this franchise apart???
my reading skills are just fine .... how r yours doing??? 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,582
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,582 |
LOL...if that's the part of his post that you're harping on, then you missed the whole point. Come on, Diam, you know better than that. 
Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,357
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,357 |
What he's saying (IMO) is that he hopes the FO doesn't cast their lot with Quinn JUST BECAUSE we traded our 08 pick to jump up and get him. Brady ain't proved jack in the NFL, diam. He probably will... but maybe not. We don't know for sure.
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,227
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,227 |
Quote:
Yes, that is basically what I am saying. I know for a fact that sometimes he is as innacurate as hell. But, I do see those throws where the ball is right on the money. IMO this is an issue that can be worked on. It tells me that with practice he will improve.
I just don't see it. He has improved, but he still stinks royally in the accuracy department and I can't see that changing. Look at it this way... after 4 years of college ball, 3 years of NFL ball (one of them as a starter), DA has managed to muster a putrid completion percentage of 56.5% this year. Most people would look at that and say that flat out stinks, given that it puts him 28th in the league, but for DA, that's a CAREER HIGH. He has never topped out over 56.5% in either college or the pros over an entire season.
How can you look at that and say that he "will improve" with practice? If practice hasn't gotten through to him by now, it's illogical to think he'll suddenly snap to and start completing 60-65% of his throws. He's been like this for almost a decade now... at what point can we finally admit that the guy isn't an accurate QB, never was an accurate QB, and never will be an accurate QB? Maybe it's just me, but that fact is plain as day, both from looking at the stat sheet and more importantly, from watching DA's wild throws every week.
We're... we're good?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,346
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,346 |
Quote:
Quote:
Yes, that is basically what I am saying. I know for a fact that sometimes he is as innacurate as hell. But, I do see those throws where the ball is right on the money. IMO this is an issue that can be worked on. It tells me that with practice he will improve.
I just don't see it. He has improved, but he still stinks royally in the accuracy department and I can't see that changing. Look at it this way... after 4 years of college ball, 3 years of NFL ball (one of them as a starter), DA has managed to muster a putrid completion percentage of 56.5% this year. Most people would look at that and say that flat out stinks, given that it puts him 28th in the league, but for DA, that's a CAREER HIGH. He has never topped out over 56.5% in either college or the pros over an entire season.
How can you look at that and say that he "will improve" with practice? If practice hasn't gotten through to him by now, it's illogical to think he'll suddenly snap to and start completing 60-65% of his throws. He's been like this for almost a decade now... at what point can we finally admit that the guy isn't an accurate QB, never was an accurate QB, and never will be an accurate QB? Maybe it's just me, but that fact is plain as day, both from looking at the stat sheet and more importantly, from watching DA's wild throws every week.
In the words of Dane Cook.....SHHHHSH!!
We might have a buyer somewhere. 
Then again, Brady does have two commercials now. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728 |
There are throws that DA makes that are as good as any QB in football. Those are some of the most difficult throws on the field which makes scouts salivate. And then there are throws that DA really struggles with that seem to defy logic. If he could find another gear (slower, crimany) on his throws he would complete a far higher percentage. Watch tapes of Kosar. No one will ever confuse him of having a rifle arm but he could make all the throws, on time, looking off the requisite defender, with touch. DA should be forced to watch a highlight package of Kosar. And can someone run a drill with DA where he has to get an egg to a RB in the flat without breaking it? Hell that might work. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,224
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,224 |
Quote:
And can someone run a drill with DA where he has to get an egg to a RB in the flat without breaking it?
Someone will complain if the spiral isn't tight. 
#gmstrong
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Mary Kay reports Jamal Lewis and
DA to be re-signed by Brownies
|
|