DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Not understanding the importance of context leads to misinformation.

Here’s some new data I found for you. When Trump said “root out the enemies from within, he was talking about using peaceful, democratic methods (primary voting, general election voting, etc )Another nail in the coffin of your deflections.

BS is not data.

You missed that he mention people like Pelosi and Shift as two of the enemies within.

Donald Trump 01:42:11-01:42:31 (19 sec)
We have to come up with votes because there's a point at which they're cheating, can't get it done. There s a point at which the cheating can't get it done, so get every patriot you know and get them out to deliver a massive victory in the primary. But honestly, more importantly, in the election, the primary.
Donald Trump 01:42:31-01:43:01 (30 sec)
Let's get the primary done first. We'll be back here many times, but we got to get the primary done first. So join our campaign by visiting nh.donaldjtrump.com or text Trump to 88022, OK? 2024 is our final battle. With you at my side, and you've been at my side from the beginning, we will demolish the deep state.
Donald Trump 01:43:01-01:43:23 (22 sec)
We'll expel -- we're going to expel those horrible, horrible warmongers from our government. They want to fight everybody. They want to kill people all over the place, places we've never heard about before, places that want to be left alone. We will drive out the globalists. We will cast out the communists, Marxists, fascists.
Donald Trump 01:43:23-01:43:52 (29 sec)
We will throw off the sick political class that hates our country. We will rout the fake news media until they become real. We will evict Joe Biden from the White House, and we will finish the job that we started better than anybody has ever started a job before. The great silent majority is rising like never before.
Donald Trump 01:43:52-01:44:35 (44 sec)
And under our leadership, the forgotten man and woman will be forgotten no longer. You're going to be forgotten no longer. With your help, your love, and your vote, we will put America first. And today, especially in honor of our great veterans on Veterans Day, we pledge to you that we will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country, that lie and steal and cheat on elections and will do anything possible, they'll do anything, whether legally or illegally, to destroy America and to destroy the American dream.
Donald Trump 01:44:35-01:45:13 (38 sec)
The real threat is not from the radical right. The real threat is from the radical left, and it's growing every day, every single day. The threat from outside forces is far less sinister, dangerous, and grave than the threat from within. Our threat is from within. Because if you have a capable, competent, smart, tough leader, Russia, China, North Korea, they're not going to want to play with us, and they didn't. Despite the hatred and anger of the radical left lunatics who want to destroy our country, we will make America great again.
[/u][u] https://rollcall.com/factbase/trump...laremont-new-hampshire-november-11-2023/

In a portion of his speech about voting at the PRIMARIES. Read this and watch your claim DIE. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 he was talking about using the Democratic process and peaceful methods at the ballot box.

And he never said HE would use military in the other clip. He said “they could”. Because he will have no power to use military on election day, which was what that discussion was about.

This it’s why You can’t take two different quotes, From two different conversations, At two different times, With two different contexts, On two different topics, With two different audiences, And smash them together. That kind of argumentation does not even reach preschool level, The media and Dems have a very low view of average Democrats to use that kind of argumentation.

Quote

Using a quote out of context deceptively is a lie.

yet you do it repeatedly on a daily basis here.

Really? Post one example.

If you can post one example, I’ll ban myself from Palus until Wednesday at 3 pm 😀

You lied about what you quoted me in your sig and you know it. And anybody with a 3rd grade education can see you lie in just about every post you write.

You seem to think I care if you're here or not. Do you really think what you say or do is that important to me? As it stands you serve as cheap entertainment.

You lied about what you quoted me in your sig and you know it. And anybody with a 3rd grade education can see you lie in just about every post you write.

Then stick around and stop acting like someone wants to appease you in order for you to leave the forum.

I don't know why you think you expect others to answer your questions while you have refused to answer the questions of others in every single thread you have started since you cam here. Quite the double standard there.

I don't know why you think you expect others to answer your questions while you have refused to answer the questions of others in every single thread you have started since you cam here. Quite the double standard there.

I answer everything except red herrings, which is all you have. 😀

You've stumbled across debates or discussions that seem to veer off-topic, haven't you? Well, there's a term for that: the Red Herring Fallacy.

A Red Herring Fallacy is an example of a deceptive tactic that diverts attention away from the real issue at hand, steering the conversation towards a different, often unrelated, topic…

The red herring logical fallacy often occurs when someone doesn't have a good argument or counter-point. Fallacies are logical errors, usually in arguments, that people make which lead to inconsistent reasoning.

In particular, this is an informal fallacy because the content of the premise(s) is what causes the misleading argument. Formal fallacies, on the other hand, are about the structure of the argument rather than the content. The red herring logical fallacy often occurs when someone doesn't have a good argument or counter-point. Fallacies are logical errors, usually in arguments, that people make which lead to inconsistent reasoning.

In particular, this is an informal fallacy because the content of the premise(s) is what causes the misleading argument. Formal fallacies, on the other hand, are about the structure of the argument rather than the content.

Instead of admitting defeat or saying, "I don't know," they throw in a distraction. Imagine you're talking about the need for clean energy, and someone says, "Well, what about jobs?" The concern for jobs is real but it's a red herring if it's used to dodge the actual issue of clean energy.

(https://practicalpie.com/red-herring-fallacy/#:~:text=While%20a%20magician%20diverts%20your%20attention%20to%20perform,someone%20doesn%27t%20have%20a%20good%20argument%20or%20counter-point)

It helps bolster my position. And I see you still refuse to address that you said you would answer my post about the lies trump told at his rally but have refused to do so. Thanks for continuing with the cheap entertainment.

And the troll makes the dawgs jump through hoops for absolutely no reason because Trump is trash. Disengage.

Nope. Just on the right side of history, UNDUPED.

It's not a double standard - it's a tactic to avoid real debate. It's a circular tactic too - you can't ask any questions becuase you have to stick to the narrowest of points that are dictated by the poster ... when that narrow confined issue looks a bit wobbly - then he changes tact and starts asking questions about the questions you raised ... but without answering your questions. Then that new question the poster asked becomes the narrow confined topic (ignoring that he's not answered any questions) .... then rinse and repeat. Oh - and I nearly forgot - throw in some asinine non-sensecal talking points that are complete nonsense while he's at it just to try and get a reaction.

Apparnetly if you quote the words out of Don the Cons very mouth - it's not enough. It's context. It's feelings. It's knowing the man behind the bluff and bluster to get in tune with his inner psyche.

A troll by any other name.

It's not a double standard - it's a tactic to avoid real debate. It's a circular tactic too - you can't ask any questions becuase you have to stick to the narrowest of points that are dictated by the poster ... when that narrow confined issue looks a bit wobbly - then he changes tact and starts asking questions about the questions you raised ... but without answering your questions. Then that new question the poster asked becomes the narrow confined topic (ignoring that he's not answered any questions) .... then rinse and repeat. Oh - and I nearly forgot - throw in some asinine non-sensecal talking points that are complete nonsense while he's at it just to try and get a reaction.

Apparnetly if you quote the words out of Don the Cons very mouth - it's not enough. It's context. It's feelings. It's knowing the man behind the bluff and bluster to get in tune with his inner psyche.

A troll by any other name.

You know you posted it. I'm not going to do some search to prove you lied about it. Denial does not become you.

And yes, trying to claim everything you know you can't defend as a red herring bolsters exactly what I posted.

I asked you how I misquoted you and you never answered. Care to do so now?

You know. Stop lying. You act like a third grader

So "trump's lawyers" made claims. Well that just settles everything!

You missed that he mention people like Pelosi and Shift as two of the enemies within.