Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#2139781 07/09/26 12:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,504
O
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,504
I'll drop an article if needed, but I'm assuming all are aware of his ongoing health issues and current absence. Not sure if there is anything to discuss that hasn't already, but I'll throw my .02 out there and see where it goes.

In a nutshell, here is my stance:

1. If I just randomly disappeared from my job for a month, you bet they would want a heads up. If I didn't communicate at all, I'd have been terminated after 2 weeks (at the absolute max) of no communication.
2. This guy was first elected 1 year after I was born, and I'm closer to retirement than not. So I guess as frustrating as this situation is, it really shouldn't be that surprising.


There are MANY areas where the criteria to become and remain a Federal, elected official should be massively overhauled. Age and/or term limits should be at the top of that list.


"FIALURE IS NOT AN OPTION...!"

-mac
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,119
M
Legend
Offline
Legend
M
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 20,119
The guy should have been gone years ago.


At DT, context and meaning are a scarecrow kicking at moving goalposts.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,753
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 79,753
You touched on my main point in all of this. I know this doesn't sound accurate in the world we currently live in, but supposedly politicians work for and represent the people who elected them. They are actually a politicians employer. I understand there are HIPPA laws that protect your medical records yet at the same time that doesn't absolve you from letting the people you work for at least know the current status of your ability to perform the duties they elected you to do.

As you eluded to, if anyone outside of elected officials did this they would have been fired. You simply can not just miss work for weeks with no explanation to your employer without losing your job.

I agree with you about term limits. Nobody should be able to control so much power for so long.

In addressing terms of age restrictions I also agree with you. But I mean as long as the Stones keep making new music they can certainly argue the point. I can see them saying, "But whatabout Keith Richards!?" naughtydevil

The biggest issue preventing these things from happening is the fact that to put these common sense measures in place would be dependent on the very people in power to have limits that would force them go give up that power. That presents quite the conundrum.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,504
O
Legend
OP Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,504
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
The guy should have been gone years ago.

Agreed, but the system allows these folks to continue in their taxpayer-funded (and well-funded, at that) jobs basically up until they are put in a grave, calling into question their performance in their jobs for a significant portion of their careers.

McConnell's situation is far from the outlier. The average age in the Senate is ~64 years old. 54 of them are 65+. House average age is 57 years, but there are more younger Reps. At the risk of derailing the convo, I'll also point out that while much was made about Biden's age in the last election (rightfully so) Trump is only 3.5 years younger. The point is that this is a systemic issue that needs a systems solution.


"FIALURE IS NOT AN OPTION...!"

-mac
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Mitch McConnell

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5