You have given reasons in support of livestreaming an execution.
Where? I can't find any of those, maybe you can point them out for me. I think you may be imagining that... which actually, ironically, supports the very thing you quoted above to dispute.
Then you aren't looking. You don't have to say, "Yeah, I support that" to be supportive of something. Making excuses as to why it's okay, minimizing the severity and using whatabouts as you so famously like to say is all a form of support.....
Just so you understand; it's never been stated or intended that this will be on someone's "TV menu" or be broadcast over the public airwaves.
The execution WILL NOT BE SHOWN ON TV.
We all know anyone that has an internet connection can live stream anything they choose. It's much like choosing which channel to watch on TV. By attempting to downplay that it's signaling at least that it's not as bad as people are suggesting it is. This is known as passive support.
I guarantee I can do some simple searches and watch rapes, murders, beheadings; anything I want within a few clicks. This isn't like a 1978 presidential address where it's locked on all three channels, you won't have to send the kids upstairs and turn the volume down.
Comparing what terrorists and criminals do and what low lifes post on the internet as an excuse why this is somehow okay for our government to do? Let me guess, you'll deny that supports it.
And yes, once again, outrage is the tail that wags the dog and no one seems to focus on the dog itself...
Once again you posted the horrific terrorist act this man committed as an excuse for a public execution. As a society we are supposed to be better than that. Only terrorists broadcast public executions. Let's try not to support we act the same way the terrorists do.
I was outraged when Obama's first Homeland Security Secretary called Fort Hood a "man-caused disaster"... and he himself said it was just "workplace violence". You? No?? See, everyone is different.
He explained why he thought it was wrong and you sated why you are different. Actually you compared how you were disgusted by something a president said and somehow managed to compare that to a public execution in terms of bothn events somehow being realted or similar.
Watch or don't watch. Part of your Freedom of Choice. I guarantee there are hundreds of family members of the 45 killed or wounded, and 300+ service members that lived through that violence, that will be watching and applaud the fact that this monster is sent to hell. What are they? Monsters?
And this is one of your weakest attempts to justify livestreaming a public execution. Executions happen in many states across this nation. Families of the victims are allowed to attend if they so choose. In case you missed it, giving reasons why something is okay or claiming that it's about the victims families when clearly this is not needed for them to witness it is in fact supporting it.
Again, before anyone gets it twisted:
I can see how many think this is a bridge too far.
It doesn't move the needle much for me.
Nobody is trying to make anyone watch it.
I have no desire to see it, so I make the simple decision not to watch.
Glad this POS is finally getting what he deserves.
Hope this may deter someone, anyone, from even considering doing something similar.
Then, to top that all off, you explain that those who object to it see it differently than you do. How others may see it as a bridge too far but it doesn't move the needle for you.
I can't believe you actually needed me to show you what you posted yourself. And I'm not the only one who saw it and questioned you about it. It seems the only one who couldn't see it was you.
