Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Quote:

All I can base my evaluations on is the body of work he has done so far




Oh,..OK then,....10-5 as a starter 29 TD's 19 INT's 3787 yds passing.
....Pretty terrible #'s for a first year starter

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Yeah, the first time I read this I thought, 'man, it's kind of simplistic and base'...and then when I saw that he wrote both sides of the coin it started to make a little more sense.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,711
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,711
Quote:

... that would be like saying Ipm a good speller cause in one long post with no big words I spelled every word right .. *LOL* ..





no way that would ever happen but your point is taken


Attitude is everything....FEAR THE ELF!!!
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
D
Legend
Offline
Legend
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,188
I didn't confuse good with great ... I confused good with serviceable cause good is the word u used .... sorry for not knowing that u meant serviceable when u said good ... *LOL* .. i'll try and not let that happen again ...




Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
F
Legend
Offline
Legend
F
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015
Quote:

I didn't confuse good with great ... I confused good with serviceable cause good is the word u used .... sorry for not knowing that u meant serviceable when u said good ... *LOL* .. i'll try and not let that happen again ...




I explained why I used good in place of serviceable, and I think the use of the word serviceable in the past on this board justifies my decision.


We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,790
Quote:

Quote:

I didn't confuse good with great ... I confused good with serviceable cause good is the word u used .... sorry for not knowing that u meant serviceable when u said good ... *LOL* .. i'll try and not let that happen again ...




I explained why I used good in place of serviceable, and I think the use of the word serviceable in the past on this board justifies my decision.




Serviceable = Sucks on this board.


#gmstrong
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Quote:

Serviceable = Sucks on this board.





at least when it's used in reference to DA...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 901
A
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 901
Man why does everything have to be so black and white on this board? Why if you think getting a 1rst and 3rd for DA does (and you think that's good and Phil should go for it) that mean you think he sucks?? Or that BQ is god?

I have some doubts about DA. I think he sucks at the touch passes and makes some very stupid decisions with the ball. I think he has a cannon for an arm, and no fear. I worry that pressure gets to him and makes him do even dumber things. I am not sold 100% on him being "our" QB.

I also realize he had an awesome year. His stats were great. He grew up a LOT during the year. He very well could end up being "our" QB.

Still I would have no problem zip, nada, 0 if Phil somehow ended up getting a first and a third for him. I would also not have a problem if that never happens and we go into next year with both QBs on the roster. In both scenerios I think we win.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
K
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,151
both qbs would work fine.

I hope that if we do go with both QBs and Derek stays the starter that if he has one bad game, particularly early in the year that we dont jump ship on him. or turn on him and say he's junk...again.


"It has to start somewhere
It has to start somehow
What better place than here?
What better time than now?"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
Quote:

Man why does everything have to be so black and white on this board? Why if you think getting a 1rst and 3rd for DA does (and you think that's good and Phil should go for it) that mean you think he sucks?? Or that BQ is god?





Because it's the most simplistic way some can think of to try to label you and lump you in a group to try to discredit your opinion. You mean you hadn't figured that out yet?



Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Quote:

Man why does everything have to be so black and white on this board? Why if you think getting a 1rst and 3rd for DA does (and you think that's good and Phil should go for it) that mean you think he sucks?? Or that BQ is god?





I think everybody wants to see what BQ can do and feel that he'll probably end up better anyway.

Some posters want BQ so bad that they've convinced themselves that DA sucks while others realize what a good "problem" we have and are willing to be patient and let things play out accordingly.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,212
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,212
Quote:

I hope that if we do go with both QBs and Derek stays the starter that if he has one bad game, particularly early in the year that we dont jump ship on him. or turn on him and say he's junk...again.




actually, that's kind of a given- Isn't it????

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126
Quote:

Quote:

All I can base my evaluations on is the body of work he has done so far




Oh,..OK then,....10-5 as a starter 29 TD's 19 INT's 3787 yds passing.
....Pretty terrible #'s for a first year starter




Thats fine but if you cant perform in the really big ones then its all window dressing.Also its important when those interception were thrown and 21% of them were thrown in the biggest game of the year.

Last edited by GARYFINN; 01/22/08 04:18 PM.
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Quote:

Thats fine but if you cant perform in the really big ones then its all window dressing.





I know why you're saying the AZ and Cinci games were big. They were,only because DA got us to that point to make them big games in the first place.

Kinda reminds me of the Kevin Mack fumble against the AFC title game against the Broncos .Although he had a great season that one play clouded his whole carreer.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Mac was a consistantly good runner ...key word..consistant..

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Quote:

Mac was a consistantly good runner ...key word..consistant..




Macks best season was his rookie year followed by a steady decline in his production through his subsequent years.

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126
Quote:

Quote:

Thats fine but if you cant perform in the really big ones then its all window dressing.





I know why you're saying the AZ and Cinci games were big. They were,only because DA got us to that point to make them big games in the first place.
.




So what your saying is its allright to take us up to a certain point,and then it doesnt matter if he cant finish ???????

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
Quote:


Some posters want BQ so bad that they've convinced themselves that DA sucks while others realize what a good "problem" we have




See, here we go.

Name ONE POSTER who has said "DA sucks". Good luck with that. What you are doing is putting words in the mouths of others.

What I have seen is people that point out his obvious weaknesses. I have seen people question, given his athletic ability, the likelihood of him maturing and outgrowing those deficiancies. But he sucks? Who said that? Nobody I've seen...........



Good problem? No, it's a pure gamble either way. IF we sign DA long term, we spend 50 to 60 mil to do it. You feel confident enough to pay him that long term? I say that's a gamble, don't you?

And, if we only sign him one year, he walks next year and we get NOTHING in return.

DA has a shot at big $$$$ in all likelihood. He would be a fool to pass it up and IMO we would be fools to pay it.

Good problem?


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Quote:

So what your saying is its allright to take us up to a certain point,and then it doesnt matter if he cant finish ???????




Not at all,but you don't kick him to the curb either. Let's wait for him to get through his first pro bowl this year before we crucify him.

I know the haters on here can't stand it when QB greats are mentioned in DA discussions but P. Manning could have only dreamed of having his first year go as well.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 816
B
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
B
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 816
Quote:

Quote:

Thats fine but if you cant perform in the really big ones then its all window dressing.





I know why you're saying the AZ and Cinci games were big. They were,only because DA got us to that point to make them big games in the first place.

Kinda reminds me of the Kevin Mack fumble against the AFC title game against the Broncos .Although he had a great season that one play clouded his whole carreer.





Brief history lesson: It was Byner who fumbled in the 2nd AFC Championship game against Denver, not Mack.


Statistics are like a bikini; what they show is interesting, but what they hide is vital.
Drive for show (1st round), Putt for dough (rest of draft).
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Not at all,but you don't kick him to the curb either. Let's wait for him to get through his first pro bowl this year before we crucify him.

Pro Bowl??




I know the haters on here can't stand it when QB greats are mentioned in DA discussions but P. Manning could have only dreamed of having his first year go as well.

I'm no hata but GMAB how great of a QB has Manning been????

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
...ooops! I meant the other guy.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Quote:

Pro Bowl??




I thought he was a reserve,....man I'm on a roll today

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,753
Quote:


I know the haters on here can't stand it when QB greats are mentioned in DA discussions but P. Manning could have only dreamed of having his first year go as well.




The "realists" understand that Peyton was a "rookie" and it wasn't his "third year in the league".



Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Quote:

DA has a shot at big $$$$ in all likelihood. He would be a fool to pass it up and IMO we would be fools to pay it.

Good problem?





Good Problem?..hell yes. Would it be better if he just sucked,..I mean,..was not good? At least we have a chance to get something good for him.You say he has a shot at big money but whoever pays it must be a fool.

If someone wanted him and was willing to pay big money,why wouldn't they give up a first and third to us now and the resign him next year(if that's how it would actually work)? The only way I see that scenario not playing out is if other interested teams are trying to call our bluff and chance it that we'll just him walk.I can't see PS allowing that to happen.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Quote:

I'm no hata but GMAB how great of a QB has Manning been????





Mannings been great,but his first 10 games under center were not as good as DA's.Wasn't PM starring down receivers and not always making the best decisions during his first year? Kinda like another guy we all know and love.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,517
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,517
And the No.1 reason for dumping DA,according to Corpus;

He's no Tim Couch.


Indecision may,or maynot,be my problem
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Starring down recievers is something all young QB's do.

Now being accurate separates the great ones from the wanna-bees...
To be a elite QB U can't leave yardage/firstdowns/points on the field.

Last edited by Attack Dawg; 01/22/08 05:58 PM.
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126
Quote:

Quote:

I'm no hata but GMAB how great of a QB has Manning been????





Mannings been great,but his first 10 games under center were not as good as DA's.Wasn't PM starring down receivers and not always making the best decisions during his first year? Kinda like another guy we all know and love.




Not exactly Manning could hit his wide open recievers not overthrow them,or throw way behind them..IMO it was Edwards Winslow and JJ that made him look a little better than he is.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
If Manning was as accurate as some claim he wouldn't have thrown 28 INT's

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 765
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 765
Quote:

And the No.1 reason for dumping DA,according to Corpus;

He's no Tim Couch.




Tim Couch might still be playing if had this offensive line & weapons when he came into the league. Anybody who says they know for sure that he wouldnt be is crazy

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126
Quote:

If Manning was as accurate as some claim he wouldn't have thrown 28 INT's





????PM was 31-14 with 4040 yds this season.

One more thing about DA,after throwing 4 INT's against the Bungals what does he do ?? In his 1st attempt against SF he throws a pick.The look on K2's face was priceless.
You would think after throwing four against the worst D in the league you might be a little more careful !! but no not DA he'll just throw it up there and see what happens.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
C
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,070
Rookie year

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,517
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,517
I would think someone with a name like Assassin wouldn't be so sensitive,but in this new age of political correctness and getting in touch with one's own feelings,I guess it's possible.
It was a joke,combining Letterman's top ten list format and Corpus's love of all things Couch.
Henchforth,I will dumb-down my jokes and try to be more cognizant of other's sensitivities.Afterall,when you have to explain your humor,it probably wasn't all that funny to begin with.


Indecision may,or maynot,be my problem
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,199
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,199
Quote:

DA is not a good QB ... he is a QB that played OK one year when everything was PERFECT and i mean PERFECT for him ...




And Edwards is not a good receiver....

Winslow is not a good tight end....

Lewis is not a good RB....ect..ect..........because every thing was perfect for them...thats why they had the success they did......







Quote:

that would be like saying Ipm a good speller cause in one long post with no big words I spelled every word right .




But did you ?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,064
Fred should have done some work. Tired old cliche stuff-- not even a QB controversy. BQ can be adequate; probably need to buy a vet backup. But I agree with the knocks. Move along indeed. No photos of Fred are needed.

Da Browns! May the Elf be with us in Ought Eight!


"Every responsibility implies opportunity, and every opportunity implies responsibility." Otis Allen Glazebrook, 1880
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 502
B
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 502
DA sucks... Evidence; Zona and 2nd Bungholes game...

Sometimes... Like we all do...

DA's stats for 2007 were serviceable??? WTFASOYTA!!!??? Some of you who think you know don't... PERIOD.

Justify servicable... This ought to be very entertaining...

Keep in mind I'm not a huge DA supporter... Never have been... I have seen him play as much or more than anyone here through out his OSU and Cleveland days...

If we can't get top ten NFL QB comp or close for DA this offseason then we keep him...

I believe BQ is the future @ QB for the Browns... But he hasn't earned the opportunity or right to show he is yet... So until then and maybe after then we need two good QB's... I personally believe that DA would be and a solid, very good back up/reliever.

This situation really isn't all the complicated or concerning... There are obvious and compelleing reasons both ways... Time will tell and we shall see... A division title and making the playoffs in 2008 should be the goal...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,861
Stop it Boise,,, you know DA has flaws

He's not perfect like Tom Brady....oh,, wait, Brady actually didn't have a very good game on Sunday.. perhaps he should be benched


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,620
Quote:

And the No.1 reason for dumping DA,according to Corpus;

He's no Tim Couch.




Sweet. All these years later and QB threads still mention Timmy.

Since no one else has mentioned it yet, DUMP HOLCOMB!!!

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
V
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
V
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
j/c:

First of all..........this thread is another good example of a person w/an agenda. Why would Corpus only post the Dump DA article rather than both? Dude, you are pathetic.


Secondly..........I am so sick of reading from Finn that Arizona was the second biggest game of the year. And no one corrects him. It wasn't even close. Buffalo was WAY bigger. So was the Seattle win. The second Baltimore win. The Houston win. Arizona.....pfftttt.

I just wish Savage didn't make the stupid trade for BQ last year. And he probably wouldn't have if it wouldn't have been for Junior. We would have had the 36th pick in last year's draft, the number 23 this year, and a good QB. Now, we have a stupid controversy.......... all because BQ's fan crew can't wait until he gets in there.


"What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us."
--Ralph Waldo Emerson
Page 2 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum THE CASE TO DUMP ANDERSON

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5