Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,230
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,230
Quote:

I cannot agree with that. For the first time in years when our QB dropped back I expected good things. Stats can be misleading, but DA numbers tell a story of success.




These "numbers" you speak of ARE "stats!

I just know the feelings of some long time Browns fans that I speak with. Their confidence level far more mirrors mine.

At any rate, neither of us know for sure at this juncture. If you believe you do? Good luck with that.



Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,528
D
Legend
Online
Legend
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,528
I think you all are crazy and haters!

KEN DORSEY IS THE FUTURE OF THIS TEAM!!!!!!


Blue ostriches on crack float on milkshakes between the sidewalk titans of gurglefitz. --YTown

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,440
T
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
T
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,440
Quote:

Quote:

there is no reason to think BQ can be better or even close to as good as DA was last year.



This I disagree with... there is a reason to believe he can be at least that good... that's why he was projected top 10, that's why we gave up what we did to get him... You think we traded up to get him and didn't think he was good enough to go 10-6 and be a pro-bowl alternate? Maybe not in his rookie year, but I guarantee you they had every reason to believe he was capable of that and more...




That's a nice twist on what I typed. I'm not saying that he can't be better. I'm saying as of now there is no proof that he is the better QB. The same can be said for DA.

Of everything I typed you took one thing and turned it into something else. Nice work.

Is there reason to think he might be that good? Yes

Is there a chance he never will be? Again Yes

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Quote:

The potential to have great touch on his short passes.





I think DA can have great touch with work. He ahs shown very sparadic touch on passes. He without a doubt in my mind needs improvement and Quinn has shown he is better if you look at what both did in college.

Quote:

The potential to scramble when needed and throw on the run.





DA will never have this. Then again, niether did Bernie.

Quote:

The potential to not only complete passes, but place them so that if our WR doesn't catch it, no defender has a shot at it. (Accuracy/ball placement)





DA has shown great accuracy at times. He has such a big arm that he can throw the ball between defenders that Quinn will never be able to do. There is not a pass that DA can't throw. The question on accuracy is consistancy.

Quote:

In the limited time we saw him, these things he DID show!




This absolutely kills me when people say this. We have not (as fans) seen enough to come to any conclusion. I think the Browns are in a better position to judge. It was well documented by the media of the struggles of both DA and Frye last training camp. I believe we also heard from Romeo about it. There have been a few things said about Quinn in practice, but nothing I know of by Romeo. I think once we are in camp we will hear more about both QBs progression.

Quote:

He has the overall smarts and skill set to be a "franchise NFL QB".





I don't know how true these statements are. Quinn is without a doubt an intelligent person. I don't really know about what has been said about his "football smarts". I know in the preseason last year Bernie was praising Frye for his reads and mentioned many times how DA was wrong in his reading of defenses.

Regular season starts and Frye looks like a deer in the headlights. DA has been praised for his reads. I'm quite confused by all of that.

I do believe that DA has better physical tools than Quinn. Remember some of the knocks on him were his accuracy and his arm is average/good?

Quote:

As I said earlier, DA has a strong arm and a quick release. What else have you seen that he does to give you cause to believe he has the qualities to reach "the next level" in the NFL?





Those are two important things. I remember him from college and couldn't believe he actually made a roster. He had similar types of numbers as last year, except his accuracy was worse. He was told in college to just "wing it". That caused many of his problems with decision making and lower completetion percentages. His numbers are still very low on certain passes like short throws. In fact I believe his completetion percentage was lower than his mid range ones. I think that is an area we can see signifacant changes in. His ability to convert on 3rd downs should not be overlooked. He has an ability to convert on long plays. that helps whipe out some of the lower completion percentages. I look at it this way, If he is 5 of 12 on a TD drive it's still a TD. Sure his completetions have to be for longer gains, but that is his strong suite. This also enables him to put points up in a hurry. I think it would be much better if he could go 9 of 12 but he will never do both. I'll settle for something in the middle.

Quote:

You know, at times I'm not 100% sure that some people even believe what they themselves type.





No doubt.

Quote:

There are no garuntees with EITHER of these two QB's.





Agreed.

Quote:

More raw talent




I don't think I agree. Quinn is more refined, but I don't know if he has more talent.

Quote:

scrambles better




Again, I don't know. He moves much better but DA has shown an ability to avoid the rush. Sometimes things equall out. Frye is probably a better scrambler than these two combined. Didn't really help his game.

Quote:

I actually saw WR's drop passes looking SHOCKED that the ball actually hit them in the hands IN STRIDE!





I know you're joking but come on, DA did hit many receivers in stride. It all comes back to consistancy.

Quote:

But if it's left to some, we'll never find out huh?





I hope we don't. I hope DA lights it up from day one and never lets up. I don't really believe it, but it would be nice. Like I said earlier, the only person that I can point to off the top of my head who is behind DA 100% is Peen. Quite frankly, I could be wrong about him. The thing is people on here seem so sure Quinn will be better. He was rated higher coming out of college, that can't be denied. Late round players are taken because they need development, they aren't usually ready to start. DA sat and now has started for one year. He hasgrown leaps and bounds in my eyes. I don't know if he can make the next jump or not. I don't feel we should be so willing to cast him aside and put our hopes in a kid who has had one series in the NFL.

We shouldn't start DA no matter what. He should be afforded the right to be the starter, just like every other position. If Quinn out plays him then a change should be made.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 496
C
1st String
Offline
1st String
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 496
Just clicking

IN MY OPINION, and yes I am shouting it so everyone can comprehend. Brady Quinn was drafted as the future for this team. All I have heard since Mr. Savage came here is we are rebuilding for the future. All of a sudden we have found a needle in the hay stack or a one hit wonder (which ever way you want to look at it) in Anderson and the future is now.

Then this off season we trade away the remaining top draft picks we have to shore up the D to make a run this season. This should make it obvious that the bulding is over. This is a huge mistake in my eyes. I don't mind winning now but to do it for a reason like saving Romeo and Phil's jobs are not what us as fans should be all about.

I was very pleased by last years draft and still believe Quinn will be an elite QB in the NFL if he gets a chance to play. The future was brite for my Browns last year but all of a sudden it has gotten dimmer. If we jerk Quinn around and he sits all year he will be gone and there will be two years of not adding wins and numbers to a career that could very well set NFL records.

Again this is only my opinion (and everone has one) but it's mine and if you don't like it TOO BAD!


Just wait till next season, I have heard that for over 40 years!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

The future was brite for my Browns last year but all of a sudden it has gotten dimmer




How so? On paper, our recievers got better, our d-line got better. We lost a bit in the secondary, perhaps...but what made it dimmer?

The fact that Quinn isn't starting? If so, do you see how little sense that makes?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,682
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,682
Quote:

JC

I don't know how anyone could have watched every play of every game last year and be certain that Anderson is the guy.




Or so sure he isn't.

He is closer to being the deal than being a nobody.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,346
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,346
Quote:

A reflection of what?




A reflection of his accuracy and what I think may be a career limitation on DAs part (again though, he is young and I don't have a crystal ball). That response of was in context of questioning his accuracy.

Quote:

These "numbers" you speak of ARE "stats!




Huh? Yes..OK.....and they do tell story that we have seldom heard in Cleveland in a long time. When was the last time that our offense threw the ball like we did last year and score as prolifically? It is that very reason that I had much more confidence in a successful outcome when DA stepped back to throw than in so many years past.


Quote:

At any rate, neither of us know for sure at this juncture




I absolutely agree with you Pit, but we do have about 15.5 games of proven ability (and yes...weaknesses) from last year to base a path forward on. That knowledge leads me to believe that the path can be a successful one. I often like to say that all Brady has is a Subway commercial and a few completions. I know it's a bit sarcastic (not caustic however), but it is true.

Proven success vs unknown. Savage said as much and I actually think you, I and most others see it in a similar light. I would love for Brady to be the next Montana, but I don't expect it or think we have to have such to be the team we wish to be. I do expect that BQ will be the QB in the near future. As the article said, the Chargers had to make a choice and we will soon be in the same boat. I expect that PS will do well with that decision.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
V
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
V
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:
I will tell you right now that if I think the better player is on the bench



Based on what? Preseason games?


Based on whatever information I have... last season, the team they were with last season, their college career, the last few games, whatever information I have... afterall, it is just my opinion and I wasn't speaking directly about BQ and DA...




LOL..................you don't have enough information. You want to believe BQ is the guy. That's not logical or rational. Let me ask you one simple question:

Do you think that Savage would have paid DA the money and that Savage and RAC, w/the obvious blessing of Chud and Rip would have named DA the starter if they thought that BQ was obviously better?

Answer that for me. Think about it and answer it honestly. Use your brain and not your emotions.



Quote:

Quote:

Quote:
I have a fear that DA is going to do just enough to keep his job but not enough to convince me that he is the guy and we are going to be sitting here in the same place next year only with major salary and hold out implications on the line......



So..............you think that Savage, RAC, Chud, and Rip want to play the worse QB? Un--freaking--real. You guys make no sense!



You know what is really un--freaking--real? The lack of reading comprehension on this board... Did I say anything even remotely close to what you think I said? No, I did not.




You're right. Your reading comprehension sucks. Yes, it is obvious what you were saying. You think that the better QB is on the bench. So therefore, why would they keep him on the bench if he was better? Why would they pay DA the money if they KNEW that BQ was better? Let me guess............they like DA better because of his haircut? Get outta here.



Quote:


So why did Charlie Frye start ahead of DA last year in week 1? Because he's better? Because he looked so much better the previous year? Because he looked so much better in practice? Because he looked so much better in preseason? Or because our coaches made a mistake in judging performance?




Finally, a decent proposal. Perhaps they chose Frye because he looked better in camp and preseason games. Perhaps he had a leg up because he was the incumbent. Perhaps, his higher draft status made him the more desirable choice.

But............did you ever consider why there was a competition in the first place and why there really isn't one this year? LOL

Did you ever even stop and think that they pulled the trigger quicker than snot froze on Tucker's mustache in the Buffalo game?

Did you ever consider that they were waiting for that opportunity and took it......and then quickly banished Frye to Seattle?


To the rest of this madness that followed:

The rats sure jumped out of the woodwork as soon as they smelled blood. And you are going to make what should be an enjoyable and growing season into pure hell. All because you wanna see your guy. You can spew your BS all you want. I know what you are up to. Seen it too many times. Your inane and uneducated reasons are going to hurt this team.

And if DA were to get hurt and BQ were to take over.......watch the excuse parade begin. The line really isn't that good. Too many guys are aging and need replaced. Lewis will have lost it. K2's knees are killing him. Joe is too old. Edwards is still good, but how can you expect him to produce big numbers again when all the other skill positions, except QB, have digressed. Oh..........and the schedule. You'll say that DA wouldn't have won a game.

You are the same group that defended Timid. You know, the guy who has been out of the league as soon as the Browns shipped his sorry ass out of Cleveland. You all don't know squat about QBs or even the game. Quit acting like you do.

Yeah, I know I do act like that. But, I do know the game. I only speak to a few things on this board. Football, basketball, and education. You don't see me acting like an expert on other topics. Stick to what you know. It's okay to have opinions and be a fan, but don't act like you know more than the Brown's coaching staff and Savage.

Believe me.............if the competition between both QBs is close, the nod will go to BQ. They have more invested in him. The fans and media favor him, and don't think that in a business as big as the NFL that marketing isn't considered.

DA is going to have to be decidedly better than BQ to play. I'm not sure if he will be, but at this point in time.............he obviously is!

Now............take your little bruised and offended egos.....regroup.......and come stronger, because not one of you have said a thing that adds up to WHY BQ is better than DA at this particular point in time. You're talking . And while it may stick to a wall.........it ain't sticking w/this guy.......who can comprehend what he reads.

Have a nice day.

Gotta admit.........this is a lot of fun.


"What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us."
--Ralph Waldo Emerson
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Any stats I might use in this post are available at NFL.com



Quote:

What happens when you have the "normal injuries" that generaly occur? How does DA scramble? How well does he throw on the roll out? Because in a "normal season" with "normal injuries" this will come to pass.






Big concern. No arguement there.


Quote:

Also, DA played pretty well in a lot of games when it turned into crunch-time. He didn't crumble like a Keebler cookie "every time" we got to "crunch-time/make or break situations". That was one game that gets blown out of proportion badly.


Quote:

I disagree. It was "the only 'make or break scenario" he's been under. If you feel that the pressure of such situations do not have an adverse effect on certain people, then we simply strongly disagree.








It all depends on your definition of "make or bread scenario". To me it's a game to game thing. If you wish to lay it all on DA for the cincy game then that's your perogitive. But to me there was a lot more going on in that game other than DA thowing picks in the wind. Palmer threw half as many passes and threw half as many picks. That's the kind of game plan, in hindsight, Chud should have called.

In my definition of "make or bread scenario", or, "crunch time" I feel dude played pretty well when the chips were down. If you want to define it as only with playoff implications at hand I still find it difficult to lay all the blame for that cincy game on DA. Apparently you don't.


Quote:

Sorry, but I've seen Bart Starr, Fran Tarkenton, Brett Favre, John Elway ( DAMN IT! ) win and excel in just as bad or worse conditions. We can play the excuse game all we like, but in make or break situations, I don't see DA having "it".





If you're looking to compare DA to some of the best in the game after he started his first season with a team who has only their second winning season in nine years that may be a bit premature. Fourty years of watching this game or not, that's very soup-like if you can stand the reference.


Quote:

He was also fairly innacurate for the majority of the season and far below average in the league in accuracy. I know most of the people I generaly watch the games with cringe every time he drops back, me included.




Accuracy? Again, no arguement there.

Cringe? How many times did you cringe leading into a TD play? 29 times? DA was 5th overall in TD's. That would be scoring for those who are following along.

30th overall in Comp. Pct and 5th in scoring. Something in that should tell you that Comp. Pct. is not the end-all, tell-all stat. DA's Comp. Pct. was a dismal 56.5. So you're right about that. By the way, just for a reference as to what I'm saying, Superebowl winning quarterback Eli Manning's Comp. Pct. was 56.1.

Another stat that gets tossed around as a big deal is the QB rating. DA's was 82.5 while Eli's was 73.9.

You see, it's not ALL on the QB. When you have a solid defense, one who can stop the run, get pressure on the QB, and get the opposing offense off the field, you can win some games, even the Superbowl, with less than stellar statistics in some of those areas in which many fans give great credence.


Quote:

I guess it's a one way street. When we win, some claim, "he had success". But when we lose, it's a "team thing". But you'll have that from time to time.





When we win it's a team win. When we lose it's a team loss. When the QB plays bad there's not much one can do to sugar-coat it. But that doesn't lay the loss squarely at the QB's feet. There's just too may plays in a game, on both sides of the ball, to blame any one player for a win or a loss. If the QB has a spectacular come from behind win some people have to mind the fact that passes don't get completed for TD's without a total team effort. There's a lot going on that the other ten guys are responsible for.


Quote:

A "premiere passing team" last season? Are you trying to insinuate that the Bengals were a "premire passing team" last season? I would certainly hope not. Their 2007 season was fairly dismal on the O side of the ball. Well, with the acception of their first game with us.

But Palmer had an off year. He was NOT his "usual self" in the 2007 season even on "non windy days". Please refer back to the above where I, and you too if you are willing to admit it, have seen MANY QB's have GREAT performances in "crunch time" in just as adverse, if not worse conditions.





26 TD's, an 1100+ yd receiver and a 1400+ yard receiver, over 4100 yards, yeah, that's pretty good. If I was mistaken for calling an offense what was in the upper 3rd of all major passing catagories then, my bad. Passing because that's what I called them, passing offense.

Also, check Palmer's stats, I wouldn't call it such a "down year" really. But I guess that's subjective.


Quote:

You can take those 4 interceptions DA threw and put them up against defensive players who would admit that had not the defense made these mistakes or those mistakes the end result would have been different. It's a team. It's more than the one guy the television camera focuses on every game.


Quote:

You just keep telling yourself that.






You just keep watching the player on camera.



Quote:

So you do not believe that the "four int's" made the difference in a W or L in that Cincy game?

Now to a degree, I agree with you. I don't blame the fact we did not make the playoffs strictly upon DA. Our D was extremly porous at best the first half of the season. Chud could have had a better game plan that day. All of these elements and more are deciding factors as to wheather we made the playoffs or not.

But the fact remains that when "the heat was on" and DA had his chance to BE "the deciding factor", he fell flat on his face with those four int's.





Sure he did. But when you're being told to throw the ball all over the field on a very windy day, something that was wisely not asked of Carson Palmer, you're begging for trouble, and they got it with that gameplan.

"All those elements and more are deciding factors as to wheather we made the playoffs or not"... but we'll just lay it all on DA anyway.

As I said in my response to BrownsFanZ who won't reply to me for whatever reason, that was one game. If the defense steps up and helps us win one of our other 5 losses that one game, "THE deciding game", doesn't even come into play. "THE deciding game" becomes a non factor itself.


Quote:

And DA is "the only guy" on our O to handle the ball on every snap.




Fourty years of watching this game and you forgot about the center.

And you forgot he only handles the ball on offense snaps.


Quote:

So when you give your QB a consistant pocket and he throws four int's, you blame others?




No. Hell no. You expect a TD evey time he makes a throw. You expect him to compare with Bart Starr, Fran Tarkenton, Brett Favre, and John Elway. If everythings so perfectly set up for him his TD's should still way overcome any INT's. Hell, that is only 4 passes.

Has none of the affore mentioned Hall of Famers ever thrown 4 picks on a windy day in their first year starting? Brett Favre is famous for throwing more picks than just about any QB in NFL history. He's lost playoff games doing just that.

It happens. It happens when you are inexperienced in big games and you press. It happens when you are highly experienced in big games and you press. DA definately needs to cut down on the picks or that kid who's breathing down his neck is going to take over his roster spot.


Quote:

My opinion of DA, lays squarely with the play of DA, not W's and L's.





That's the proper way to look at it in my opinon.


Quote:

You see, I'm of the opinion, and having played sports all through high school, I've seen it first hand MANY times, that when "the heat is on" some people step it up a notch. Their competative juices flow. They actually "play better" under such stress and pressure.

Then I've seen "the chokers". Who, when the heat is on, they crunble under the pressure of it. Now you may see the logic in this, or you may not. But please at least think about this and consider it........................





I'm not 13 years old. And I have my own set of eyes. What I saw out of DA was when the heat was on he played exceptionally well. At one point I compared him to a closer who doesn't get fully focused until he's put 2 guys on. Then he closes the game for the win.

DA often seems to start cold and we've gotten into a pressure situation in which his slow start played a part. But at one point he steps up. Look at the 3rd and long throws he made consistantly. Circus catches? Some. Ball placed where it could be caught? On every catch that was true. Tell me you didn't see that out of him consistantly. We had more successful 3rd and longs than I can remember for quite some time. Those are pressure situations.

DA does play better in pressure situations in my opinion. I think he's shown that over and over. It's those pressure situations in which we came up successful that lead me to belive that he dosen't fold under pressure.

"THE deciding game" seems to be the single game that you're focused on and calling it crumbling under the pressure because he wasn't able to execute an arguably flawed game plan.

It's one game that you seem to be pointing out as the tell-all that he is a choker. And is that because it was our last chance to get into the playoffs? We had 5 other chances to win a game that would have gotten us into the playoffs. But apparently they don't count. I though every game did. Again, my bad.


Quote:

Now let's fast forward to nearing the end of the season. How much did the pressure raise? Let's take a look at it for a minute. First, let's look at DA's "long term career". He knew he would be a FA at seasons end. He knew that in those last few games, it could garner him a 5 to 6 year deal as a "franchise QB' making anywhere from 45-60 million dollars.

He knew that by playing "lights out" there would create a higher value and competition for his services that would command a high price for a LONG time! He also knew that by performing well in the Cincy game, he would have made the playoffs which in essence would show that he could handle the heat when the pressure was on to other teams that could drive his value even higher.

Once the stress and pressure elevated to that juncture, we saw the results. He had yet one more chance to redeem himself to drive up his stock, the pro bowl. One last "at bat" to raise his stock which could mean the difference in millions of $$$ to DA. Yet once again we saw the results when "the REAL heat was on".

You see, I'm not trying to use DA as a scapegoat here. Actually, I'm simply breaking down how he performed in the face of increasing pressure and adversity when such performances were critical to his wallet and career.





You've watched this game for forty years and played it all through HS and think that is what is going on in the mind of a player who is trying to win the next game?

I'm sorry Pit, but that is just one hell of a load of mental masterbation.

I don't care who you are, that there's funny right there.


Quote:

Now you can explain that away by weather if you like. Although I've seen MANY "good QB's" play VERY well in as bad and worse conditions.





I remember a Browns/Bengals game when Bernine & Co. couldn't complete a pass to save their lives due to the wind, the cold and the rain and the muddy field. Meanwhile, Boomer & the Boys were playing toss and catch against us almost at will. I understood it's hard to throw and catch under those circumstances but then, how in the heck was cincy doing it when we couldn't? It happens. That's all. It happens.

I'll say it again for you and any others who might not understand. I am not defending DA because I feel he is our only option at QB. I just feel that for as good a season as we've had, with the best QB performance we've seen from the Browns in 9-freaking-years, it's hard for me to stand by when he is being dissed as our problem. What problem?

Personally, I would like to see Quinn win the job. That would mean he's playing better than DA so it would be an upgrade. And I'm all for an upgrade at any position.

I'm pretty sure that Quinn can do some things that DA can't. But I'm also pretty sure that DA can do some things that Quinn can't. Plus, he did one hell of a job for us in '07 and I'll defend any Browns player who had that kind of season for us but gets the raspberry from the fans anyway.

If Trent Dilfer was backing up DA I'd bet that everyone would be completely estatic over DA's play. That would be the talk. Not the fault finding mission some are on now.

I really believe that the fault finding mission is fueled by the fact that our Round 1 draft pick is waiting in the wings and fans want to "see what he can do".

I have no idea who our QB is going to be come game one in '08. I am even less sure of who will be our startng QB going into game one in '09.

But I'm sure glad we kept them both as that will give us more time to make an evaluation and a more accurate decision on who will be our quarterback of the future. Right now I like the QB situation we're in. Anyone want to trade this situation with any other QB tandem we've trotted out on the field in the past 9 years?


Quote:

And good night Mrs. Kallibash, wherever you are............




Mrs. Calabash is here with me bemoaning the fact that you spelled her name wrong.


...damn, I'll argue about anything won't I?


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:

Just food for thought...if DA really was kicking Quinn's butt, why would Mel Kiper say the Browns are even happier with Quinn now than they were when they drafted him?

Doesn't make sense...






It makes sense if you want to keep both QB's working hard and no one getting the feeling that he's on the outside looking in.

Remember what Savage said about the upcoming DA contract? It was something to the effect that it would be for a number of years and amount of money that would be fair to DA for his accomplishments and still not take the competitive spirit out of Brady Quinn.

That's the juggling act he's taken on with those two.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:

I just know the feelings of some long time Browns fans that I speak with. Their confidence level far more mirrors mine.





Since when has the majority ever been right?


"Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it."



Sorry my friend, I couldn't resist.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:

Then this off season we trade away the remaining top draft picks we have to shore up the D to make a run this season. This should make it obvious that the bulding is over. This is a huge mistake in my eyes. I don't mind winning now but to do it for a reason like saving Romeo and Phil's jobs are not what us as fans should be all about.





I don't think it's like that at all although it's been a popular opinon.

Heck man, we don't even know for sure who our quarterbck is going to be. It was stated as such by Savage when he said he wanted to keep both to give them more time to make a decision. DA's contract backs that statement up.

You make a run every year. This year we needed an improved defense or we were going to have a fall off from the progress we made last season and Savage did what he had to do to accomplish that.

He didn't trade away the future for the now. This season they will continue to build on the team just as they have been. They will carefully watch and evaluate both quarterbacks and come to a decision as to who will be the quarterback of the future and who will move on.

Then we are going to make our "run" (as some people see it). It will be a beginning of sorts. Franchise QB plugged in, a year of an improved defense. We should be good to go for '09.

The building isn't over. Therefor there is no mistake.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Quote:

I always get a chuckle when peope like you bring up his preseason performance and one series during the season as some kind of proof. We just don't know enough about either guys. You want to throw DA out with the bath water...Fine. You might be proven right. He might have had his best year as a player last year. For you to think that way I find crazy.




I always say that we haven't seen enough of Quinn. You can't rely on one preseason. But you can see things in him that you don't need to watch for 2 years to see. The poise and control that he has I thought was great.

And I never said anything about throwing him away with the bath water. Before FA started, I was all for shipping him out. IMO, the huge needs open on D far outweighed the QB competition. I'll take those draft picks and shore up my line or find a pass rusher. And I know I've used this before, but you don't always have to have a big time QB to win a Superbowl. Trent Dilfer anyone?

Luckily for us, Phil found a way to not only shore up the trenches, but keep both QB's. I would have never expected Phil to pull off those moves. As much as I hate mortgaging the future by trading picks, I think the level of proven talent we recieved is most likely better than any 3rd or 4th rounder.

I think some people getting into this whole deadbate are taking things out of context too much, and labeling anyone who wants to see Quinn get a chance a "DA hater." I don't hate the guy. I don't want to see him fail. I was happy for him getting all the recognition and what he did for the offense. I obviously have my concerns with him, as do others. All people are simply saying is to just get this decision right.


[Linked Image from pic18.picturetrail.com]
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Quote:

The rats sure jumped out of the woodwork as soon as they smelled blood. And you are going to make what should be an enjoyable and growing season into pure hell. All because you wanna see your guy.




How so? Fans on a message board are going to make a season pure hell? Talk about not making an sense.....


Quote:

Now............take your little bruised and offended egos.....regroup.......and come stronger, because not one of you have said a thing that adds up to WHY BQ is better than DA at this particular point in time. You're talking . And while it may stick to a wall.........it ain't sticking w/this guy.......who can comprehend what he reads.






I'm surprised you don't post in the Smack Shack. Seems to be where most of your posts belong. Do you get off on this? Seriously.


[Linked Image from pic18.picturetrail.com]
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:

Trent Dilfer anyone?





Trent Dilfer...only one.

To pull off what the Rats did you need a defense like they had. They were arguably as good or better than the '85 Bears. Raise your hand if you think they'll be saying that about our 30th ranked defense any time soon.



#gmstrong
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,311
K
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
K
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,311
j/c

Hey um, guys... it's only May.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
J
Legend
Offline
Legend
J
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
Funny, I've seen a ton of people deeply involved in football and with self-proclaimed football genuis be dead wrong about many football related issues and about decisions made on players. I do think Phil is making all the right moves with this, and my guess is that he has just as many questions about DA as some of us, with our piddly little football brains do. They have to see if the positives we saw out of DA are going to show themselves again and the negatives are going to subside. If anyone thinks RAC and Savage aren't concerned about what they saw in the later part of the season, they are either posturing for ego's sake or not being realistic.

For any fan of this team to come on here and tell other fans they shouldn't be posting because they aren't "football" wise and brag about their own prowess to try and bully people with a view other than their own is not only sad, it's rather pathetic and mean-spirited.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,160
HEY! GET OUTTA here with your non football wise takes and whatever else you said..
Hey I gotta get my Papa Johns 23 cent pizza today

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Quote:

I'm not 13 years old.






I'm going to give my general opinion on this subject. While DA may not have played at a lights-out-All-Pro level, he played well enough for us to win 10 games and come within a game of making the playoffs. We did this while having the worst defense in the NFL. Can someone tell me the last time the team with the worst defense in the NFL went 10-6?

Everyone on here knows that DA has the ability to make every throw on the field. His arm strength is right up there with Brett Favre's. He has made throws that no one in their right mind could expect someone to make. DA can thread the needle just as well as anyone. Where he lacks in accuracy is on the short, simple throws. We know that this problem has nothing to do with the arm because we see him make some of the most accurate throws possible. We know that this is a matter of consistency and is fixable.

We have seen time and time again that DA has an extremely quick release. Despite us having a great O-Line (hearing that never gets old) there will be times where that will be very important. Another thing that we can't over-look is that DA has great size. He's 6'6" 230 lbs. That sounds great to me.

Also, DA seemed to show a lot of improvement as the year went on. There were times where you could tell that he wanted to go deep but it just wasn't there. He would then dump it off. IMO this is where he improved the most. Yeah he threw 19 picks last year, but Brett Favre, who is one of the best QB's ever, has the record for most interceptions in a career. And like any other young QB you would expect him to improve a lot more.

Now lets see what we have in BQ. With BQ there is an unproven quarterback with eight career pass attempts. Quinn has a strong arm but no where near as strong as DA's. There were concerns with BQ's accuracy coming out of college. Personally, I never saw it, but you would think that there would be some truth behind it. Quinn was known as being a smart QB and it could easilly be argued that this is DA's biggest weakness.

Like DA, Quinn has very good size. I doubt that anyone on here would argue that Quinn isn't more mobile than DA. That is a given. With our old O-Line that would have been important to me, now I care more about pocket presence. DA almost never leaves the pocket. BQ was a very good pocket passer at Notre Dame and you would think that he would be in the NFL as well.

My basic point is that with DA we know what we have. He is a guy who can help us get 10 wins with the worst defense in the NFL. He earned the starting job last year. We have no idea what we have in BQ. It can be argued that DA made a lot of mistakes last year and hindered our team. I think that our defense hindered our team a lot more than Anderson did. While I am no where near sold on Anderson, at least we know what he can do for us. And that is give us a very respectable record with (yes, I'm going to say it again) an awful defense.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
J
Legend
Offline
Legend
J
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,367
Very good points and well thought out. Much of what you say I have commented on before and do believe. I do disagree with the point you make about us knowing what we have and knowing we can get 10 wins out of him in the future. I don't know that at all. This year will give us a much better idea about that however, as we face some stiffer competition, at least on paper. This season will give us many of our answers regarding DA, IMO.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Quote:

Quote:

Trent Dilfer anyone?





Trent Dilfer...only one.

To pull off what the Rats did you need a defense like they had. They were arguably as good or better than the '85 Bears. Raise your hand if you think they'll be saying that about our 30th ranked defense any time soon.







The point was improving the D while not having a drop off or much of a drop off at QB. IMO, fixing the D-line was a priority and more important than the QB debate. Luckily, Savage found a way to keep both guys and fix the D-line.

So fixing the defense would mean going up from a 30th ranked defense. Trent Dilfer didn't have the same weapons as we do at this point in time as well. I don't think our D will be anything near the Ravens D was, but the point was to improve it while not dropping off much on offense.


[Linked Image from pic18.picturetrail.com]
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
A
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
Quote:

Funny, I've seen a ton of people deeply involved in football and with self-proclaimed football genuis be dead wrong about many football related issues and about decisions made on players. I do think Phil is making all the right moves with this, and my guess is that he has just as many questions about DA as some of us, with our piddly little football brains do. They have to see if the positives we saw out of DA are going to show themselves again and the negatives are going to subside. If anyone thinks RAC and Savage aren't concerned about what they saw in the later part of the season, they are either posturing for ego's sake or not being realistic.

For any fan of this team to come on here and tell other fans they shouldn't be posting because they aren't "football" wise and brag about their own prowess to try and bully people with a view other than their own is not only sad, it's rather pathetic and mean-spirited.




I totally agree with you. For crying out loud, we just needed more time to evaluate.

It makes little sense to leave the QB position solely in the hands of someone with 8 regular season passes. Yes Anderson showed flaws but he also showed promise, we need to find out for sure.

Rather than belittle others thoughts on the topic, I'd rather focus on what both QB's bring to the table.

Anderson:
-Posesses a cannon of an arm and can make throws that WOW you.
-More proven than Quinn
-Decision-making improved down the stretch, accuracy did not.
-Still has questionmarks about his game. Need to see more to see if he can make the next step.

Quinn:
-Has the pedigree
-Inexperienced, didn't even get enough preseason seat time let alone regular season.
-We have very little film on him, not nearly enough.
-When he has played, he's shown a TON of promise, from poise, accuracy and arm strength. Need to see more to make sure the positives he's shown are not a fluke.

May the best man win, my money's on #10 but I'm not gonna write off #3 either.

I don't think that's being unfair to either QB.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 94
M
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
M
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 94
Quote:


Believe me.............if the competition between both QBs is close, the nod will go to BQ. They have more invested in him. The fans and media favor him, and don't think that in a business as big as the NFL that marketing isn't considered.

DA is going to have to be decidedly better than BQ to play. I'm not sure if he will be, but at this point in time.............he obviously is!






Where are you getting this idea? Savage himself has said that Quinn "would really have to play lights out" to become the starter. This would seem to imply that if all things were more or less equal, DA is the starter. Right?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
That's the way I took it. But Vers has the best comprehension skills on the board, so I wouldn't question him.


[Linked Image from pic18.picturetrail.com]
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,230
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,230
Quote:

Quote:

The potential to scramble when needed and throw on the run.





DA will never have this. Then again, niether did Bernie.




I agree. But Bernie was EXTREMLY accurate and recieved two degrees in three years. So not only was he accurate, but extremly smart. DA scored a 15 on his wonderlic test. Only two points above Vince Young.


Quote:

Quote:

The potential to not only complete passes, but place them so that if our WR doesn't catch it, no defender has a shot at it. (Accuracy/ball placement)





DA has shown great accuracy at times. He has such a big arm that he can throw the ball between defenders that Quinn will never be able to do. There is not a pass that DA can't throw. The question on accuracy is consistancy.




Here we agree to some extent. Firstly, I believe "throwing between defenders" can come back to bite you in your arse no matter how strong your arm is. And secondly is not a smart decision.

I do believe that DA shows many "flashes" of great accuracy, but with a lack of consistancy. But as far as "putting the ball where ONLY our WR's have a shot at it"? I've seen it from Quinn, but not from DA.

Quote:

Quote:

In the limited time we saw him, these things he DID show!




This absolutely kills me when people say this. We have not (as fans) seen enough to come to any conclusion. I think the Browns are in a better position to judge. It was well documented by the media of the struggles of both DA and Frye last training camp. I believe we also heard from Romeo about it. There have been a few things said about Quinn in practice, but nothing I know of by Romeo. I think once we are in camp we will hear more about both QBs progression.




That's why I said "from what we've seen". And no, it wasn't a lot. But I believe considering rookie jitters, holding out and on a new team, in what little time we did see him, all of these things appeared not to rattle the kid at all. He seemed poised, confident and accurate. A FAR better skill set than DA started out with. And he did show "all of the raw tools" that it takes to be a "potential" franchise QB.

Quote:

I do believe that DA has better physical tools than Quinn. Remember some of the knocks on him were his accuracy and his arm is average/good?




Other than a strong arm and quick release, what are these "physical tools" you feel he posesses over Quinn? And I saw Quinns "arm" in college and pre season. There's a difference in a "knock on somebody" and reality. If you mean a 50 yard pass with bullet speed? I can see that. But a 50 yard pass that goes right over the WR's shoulder into his hands? Quinn can do that.

Quote:

Those are two important things. I remember him from college and couldn't believe he actually made a roster. He had similar types of numbers as last year, except his accuracy was worse. He was told in college to just "wing it". That caused many of his problems with decision making and lower completetion percentages. His numbers are still very low on certain passes like short throws. In fact I believe his completetion percentage was lower than his mid range ones. I think that is an area we can see signifacant changes in. His ability to convert on 3rd downs should not be overlooked. He has an ability to convert on long plays. that helps whipe out some of the lower completion percentages. I look at it this way, If he is 5 of 12 on a TD drive it's still a TD. Sure his completetions have to be for longer gains, but that is his strong suite. This also enables him to put points up in a hurry. I think it would be much better if he could go 9 of 12 but he will never do both. I'll settle for something in the middle.





I do not believe he holds the "variety of tools" that it takes to be a "complete QB". He has a "couple of them", but after how many years in the NFL now? If those attributes aren't showing now, I find it highly unlikely they will ever show.


Quote:

Quote:

More raw talent




I don't think I agree. Quinn is more refined, but I don't know if he has more talent.




Better scrambler. Better at throwing on the run. Better "ball placement" so that ONLY our WR's have a shot at the ball. Yet he STILL has enough arm to throw the long ball, while having great touch on the short stuff. And he hasn't spendt four years in the NFL. Imagine what HE can be like in three or four years with NFL coaching that DA has ALREADY recieved.


Quote:

Quote:

scrambles better




Again, I don't know. He moves much better but DA has shown an ability to avoid the rush. Sometimes things equall out. Frye is probably a better scrambler than these two combined. Didn't really help his game.




JUST having "good feet" alone isn't the greatest of attributes. But being able to look downfield and using your scrambling to buy time for your WR's to get open is a VERY valuable tool. One that will show greatly when ( not if ) our OL gets banged up. That's when I believe we'll actually "get to see" the stark contrast between these two QB's.


Quote:

Quote:

I actually saw WR's drop passes looking SHOCKED that the ball actually hit them in the hands IN STRIDE!





I know you're joking but come on, DA did hit many receivers in stride. It all comes back to consistancy.




The future of our TEAM comes back to consistancy. And in the last game of our season last year, that too became painfully obvious.

Quote:

Quote:

But if it's left to some, we'll never find out huh?





I hope we don't. I hope DA lights it up from day one and never lets up. I don't really believe it, but it would be nice. Like I said earlier, the only person that I can point to off the top of my head who is behind DA 100% is Peen. Quite frankly, I could be wrong about him. The thing is people on here seem so sure Quinn will be better. He was rated higher coming out of college, that can't be denied. Late round players are taken because they need development, they aren't usually ready to start. DA sat and now has started for one year. He hasgrown leaps and bounds in my eyes. I don't know if he can make the next jump or not. I don't feel we should be so willing to cast him aside and put our hopes in a kid who has had one series in the NFL.




IF DA "starts in the regular season", I wish him all the success in the world! Problem being, there are many tools that he simply does not posess. Quinns skill set is FAR more "prototypical" of a franchise NFL QB.

I feel he's a more "well rounded" QB. Now once again we come to a conundrum. How will we ever know if Quinn is better if he never gets to start?

Like I said, IMO, when ( not if ) we see our RB and our OL get banged up, the weaknesses in DA's game will rear their ugly heads. And the weaknesses that rear their ugly heads are the very strengths that Quinn posses that will seperate the two.

Quote:


We shouldn't start DA no matter what. He should be afforded the right to be the starter, just like every other position. If Quinn out plays him then a change should be made.




Agreed.

JMHO


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,230
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,230
Quote:

Huh? Yes..OK.....and they do tell story that we have seldom heard in Cleveland in a long time. When was the last time that our offense threw the ball like we did last year and score as prolifically?




That's a VERY easy answer!

It was the last time we had an OL that could give our QB a consistant pocket. That's a funny thing about this board.

It seemed "everybody and their brother" knew that our QB's would look better behind a GOOD OL.

Now that the OL is built? A QB who is average at best is made out to be a God.

Could it be that he looked better simply because he had a consistant pocket in which he could develop a comfort zone rather than some "great improvement from DA"?

I think so. I think many give DA too much credit and the OL not near enough.

JMHO


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,230
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 75,230
Quote:

When we win it's a team win. When we lose it's a team loss. When the QB plays bad there's not much one can do to sugar-coat it.




Well he threw those four int's in the "deciding game" as to wheather we made the playoffs or not.

And it seems like a LOT of "sugar coating" to deny he chokes in such situations.



Quote:

If the defense steps up and helps us win one of our other 5 losses that one game, "THE deciding game", doesn't even come into play. "THE deciding game" becomes a non factor itself.




And if frogs had wings, their butts wouldn't hit the ground when they jumped!


Point being, that WAS the scenario. It WAS a "make or break" game as to wheather we made the playoffs. And on a windy day, the "short stuff" can be delivered. But I keep forgetting, that is one of the areas he's "poorest" at.

Quote:

No. Hell no. You expect a TD evey time he makes a throw. You expect him to compare with Bart Starr, Fran Tarkenton, Brett Favre, and John Elway. If everythings so perfectly set up for him his TD's should still way overcome any INT's. Hell, that is only 4 passes.




Here we have a miscommunication. I would like to see him at least SHOW some signs of "having the same attributes" of these QB's. You know? A "well rounded QB" that posesses all the skills needed to become a franchise QB.

I do not believe his performances should "mirror" those QB's in their prime. But many of the attributes in those QB's I do not see in DA.

Quote:

I'm sorry Pit, but that is just one hell of a load of mental masterbation.




If you don't understand that the raw human emotion that goes along with him becoming a FA, his future career and playoff implications running through one's mind as a FAR higher degree of pressure than "just any game", then I do not feel that you truely understand how the human mind operates.

Nervousness, pressure and stress was at an all time high for DA in both the Cincy game and the pro bowl. At that juncture? He crumbled.

He knew that financialy, professionaly and his status in the NFL was on the line in BOTH of these games. When the fire was turned up, he fizzled out.

Call that what you will. But the intensity was elevated and we all saw the results wheather you wish to see it for what it is or not.

JMHO


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,671
R
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
R
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,671
"...And if frogs had wings, their butts wouldn't hit the ground when they jumped!"

Pit, thank you for giving me another thing to agree with you about. Really!


The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, .
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

DA scored a 15 on his wonderlic test. Only two points above Vince Young.




Terry Bradshaw couldn't spell 'cat' if you spotted him the C and the T.

Are we really citing Wonderlic scores?

Quote:

I do believe that DA shows many "flashes" of great accuracy, but with a lack of consistancy. But as far as "putting the ball where ONLY our WR's have a shot at it"? I've seen it from Quinn, but not from DA.




Which of Quinn's 4 completions sold you on his ability to do so?

Quote:

But I believe considering rookie jitters, holding out and on a new team, in what little time we did see him, all of these things appeared not to rattle the kid at all.




I watched DA for an entire year under center and he showed a hell of a lot of poise....he shook things off and didn't seem to get rattled.

Quote:

And he did show "all of the raw tools" that it takes to be a "potential" franchise QB.




And Anderson didn't?

DA threw 29 TD strikes in his first year as a starter. Quinn threw 9 passes in his first year in the league. And yet one has "raw potential" and the other has hit his ceiling?

You honestly can't see the bias there?


Quote:

He has a "couple of them", but after how many years in the NFL now? If those attributes aren't showing now, I find it highly unlikely they will ever show.




He's started ONE season in the NFL.

I wonder if after Quinn's first season under center you're ready to call him a finished product?

Quote:

Better scrambler. Better at throwing on the run. Better "ball placement" so that ONLY our WR's have a shot at the ball. Yet he STILL has enough arm to throw the long ball, while having great touch on the short stuff




Which of his four completions sold you on this again?

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Quote:



Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I do believe that DA shows many "flashes" of great accuracy, but with a lack of consistancy. But as far as "putting the ball where ONLY our WR's have a shot at it"? I've seen it from Quinn, but not from DA.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Which of Quinn's 4 completions sold you on his ability to do so?





Really, Quinn has only thrown 4 completions EVER?

The guy had a lot of National exposure playing for Notre Dame. Putting the ball on the money is putting the ball on the money, no matter when or where you're playing. You don't have to have an "official" NFL game to see that a guy is accurate and throws a good ball.


[Linked Image from pic18.picturetrail.com]
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 192
S
Shark Offline OP
2nd String
OP Offline
2nd String
S
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 192
Quote:


Really, Quinn has only thrown 4 completions EVER?

The guy had a lot of National exposure playing for Notre Dame. Putting the ball on the money is putting the ball on the money, no matter when or where you're playing. You don't have to have an "official" NFL game to see that a guy is accurate and throws a good ball.




I would assume Tim Couch, Akili Smith, and Ryan Leaf also "put the ball on the money" during college.


Afterall, this production against college defenses and talent is what got them drafted in the first round.


I would disagree with your last statment and say you DO need an official NFL game(s) to determine a qb's response to NFL defensive schemes and talent.

Oh, almost forgot...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Quote:

Quote:


Really, Quinn has only thrown 4 completions EVER?

The guy had a lot of National exposure playing for Notre Dame. Putting the ball on the money is putting the ball on the money, no matter when or where you're playing. You don't have to have an "official" NFL game to see that a guy is accurate and throws a good ball.




I would assume Tim Couch, Akili Smith, and Ryan Leaf also "put the ball on the money" during college.


Afterall, this production against college defenses and talent is what got them drafted in the first round.


I would disagree with your last statment and say you DO need an official NFL game(s) to determine a qb's response to NFL defensive schemes and talent.

Oh, almost forgot...





There's a lot more to quarterbacking than just throwing the ball. You have to look at other factors. Most guys don't fail in the NFL because they can't throw the ball. Top draft picks usually have the toolsets, and fail for other reasons. High picks tend to go to the worst teams. There's the complexity of read NFL defenses that just don't get.

If you want to use that example, then what about DA's college career? I can't sit here and say I watched him play, but his completion percentage wasn't very hot. And it still isn't. That is pretty consistent, isn't it? Here's his completion percentages:

OSU - 2001 41.5%
2002 47%
2003 51.2%
2004 54.2%

CLE- 2006 56.4%
2007 56.5%

Not very good numbers.

I was just referring to Phil saying that you can't judge Quinn's accuracy in throwing 4 balls. (he actually was 3 of 8). You can still see it in preseason, training camp, and his college career. Then you have to take in the other considerations in the NFL since things move faster, guys are better, and the schemes more complex. Just like moving up to the NFL doesn't change DA's arm strength, it doesn't change the accuracy of passes IMO. Now if you can't read a defense, it's going to look like you can't throw the ball. But that's not what I'm talking about.

Quinn's numbers at ND:

2003 47.3%
2004 54.1%
2005 64.9%
2006 61.9%

Those numbers are a little better. Sure, different offenses making different throws, different competition. We can sit here forever and find something to pick apart. Point is, DA has been inconsistent. The guy pointed out that you can't know how accurate Quinn is by 1 series in the NFL. I just have to disagree.


[Linked Image from pic18.picturetrail.com]
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
V
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
V
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,618
I thought he was 3 for 8. Not 4 for 9. But either way...........these experts just know BQ is better.

Jules and 17..........do you both post w/a sour pickle in your mouths? *L*


msiterbaseball:

Quote:


Where are you getting this idea? Savage himself has said that Quinn "would really have to play lights out" to become the starter. This would seem to imply that if all things were more or less equal, DA is the starter. Right?




I'm getting it from what they have already seen from the two. It hasn't been that close.


Now..............there is some indecision in their minds. Neither QB has proven enough to be counted on as the guy. Neither has played so awful that he has proven not to be the guy. Savage did a masterful job of keeping both guys and keeping them relatively satisfied.

The competition is not over. It's just at this point, DA has shown them more than BQ. If he hadn't, he would be on another team right now, and you can take that one to the bank.


"What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us."
--Ralph Waldo Emerson
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:



I'm not 13 years old.


Quote:












Deepthreat, that was in reference to the "talking down to me" comment he made. Much like some "adults" speak down to a 13 year old. I'm sure you've experienced that a time or two.

It had nothing to do with minimizing the intelligence of a 13 year old. I'm sure you know me better than that.

Good take in your post btw. As always.


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:

...Bernie was EXTREMLY accurate and recieved two degrees in three years. So not only was he accurate, but extremly smart. DA scored a 15 on his wonderlic test. Only two points above Vince Young.







Dan Marino............15
Jim Kelly...............15
Terry Bradshaw......15
Steve McNair..........15
Donovan McNabb....14


http://www.macmirabile.com/wonderlic.htm


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
D
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,189
Quote:

If you don't understand that the raw human emotion that goes along with him becoming a FA, his future career and playoff implications running through one's mind as a FAR higher degree of pressure than "just any game", then I do not feel that you truely understand how the human mind operates.





If you allow yourself to focus on those things you mention, then you are not allowing yourself enough focus on the task at hand which is the game.

You focus on the game at hand. The rest will take care of itself.

You seem to blame him for not putting enough focus on those oh-so-important elements that are on the fringe compared to the actual game.

And I feel that I truely do understand how your human mind operates after the whole diatribe you've been going through.


#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,177
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,177
Quote:

May the best man win, my money's on #10 but I'm not gonna write off #3 either.

I don't think that's being unfair to either QB.






I agree completely...but it seems nobody that beleives Derek is our franchise QB wants a open competition. I don't know if Quinn can fair better, but unless DA fixes the craters in his game he isnt the answer.

Among other things..... 2 things I've read in this thread that I find quite amusing.

1. Derek will have to play MUCH better than Quinn to start... Dunn who said it, but comon people use logic. It's DA job until he falls apart completely and leaves no doubt, that is the only way Quinn sees the field.

2. "Derek won 10 games" Did he? I didn't know there were 10 other players on the field on offense and 11 on defense, must be watching two seperate games.

Then again I guess J Lewis won 10 games as well...Derek certainly won us a few games, but giving him credit for 10 wins is insane. It's the worst way on earth to judge a QB by regular season wins. He won us a few, and lost us a few. He didnt lose all 6 games and he didnt win all 10 games. Its stupid to asign a record of a TEAM to a player.

It's no different than a pitcher in baseball, if he goes 22-3 but has an era of 9.40. You can't judge on wins & loses in a TEAM sport.

This thread is pointless, as will be the next 57 before August, Derek is the guy, whether or not we fans agree. Time will tell if he can be the QB for this team.

It's like reading a political thread...too much propaganda and silly egos banging heads.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
P
PDR Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Quote:

The guy pointed out that you can't know how accurate Quinn is by 1 series in the NFL. I just have to disagree.




We'll have to agree to disagree, because I think this statement is completely absurd.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,803
Quote:

Jules and 17..........do you both post w/a sour pickle in your mouths? *L*





Dude, you were pretty harsh. I couldn't figure out if you were kidding or not. I hope you were just screwing around, because if you weren't I would fall into the category of "shouldn't post".


#gmstrong
Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Savage conducting chemistry experiment in Cleveland

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5