DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum OSU VS USC GAME DISCUSSION THREAD

Your post is hard to interpret but they lost most recently against Stanford, UCLA and Oregon State. Not exactly powerhouses.

salty and fletch, we are all browns fans, and most know you dont like OSU, so just let this one go, not sure what you are trying to prove.

Quote:

---

Tress god bless his soul has hit cooper status( i think thts wht u meant?)

---

no, not so much Jim, i just think Todd Boeckmann has short cicuited the talent on this team, and IMO opinion, tonight was a microcosim of Jim being conservative and Todd, never being that guy.

Ture. USC has amazing talent. Amazing coaches and they have a fantastcic recruiting program. They have pretty much owned most teams from most everywhere over the past several years They are the best team in the country right now. They would own conference right now.

USC's record and staus over the past several years has been outstanding. They have been the best program over all for some time now.

As much as that pains me to wirite. The facts are the facts.

Well that Texas team ended the season with 2 additional losses by a total of 8 points in the mighty Big XII. I'd consider it an impressive win.

I understand your thinking and feelings.
And thanks for asking.
But no, i won't stop until I'm ready or done.

If you don't want to read it don't. If you don't like seeing or hearing the facts or another perspectives other that the usual OSU speak too bad. This is a Browns board not an OSU board. Go the the OSU board. You won't see me there. You won't read this there.

You should know when you're too heavily under the influence to post on here, as to not disgrace your own name man. I think it's time to call it a night.

You are making assumptions on my sobriety? I don't drink or use any drugs.
What does your lack of knowledge and comprehension on certain topics have to do with my sobriety?

Your replies are inaccurate.

So, if USC has lost, loses to other PAC 10 schools, which I mentioned initially and they blew out OSU how can that mean that the PAC 10 isn't any good?

Does the win tonight mean that the "not exactly powerrhouse teams" in the PAC 10, as you called them, could beat OSU? Does that mean the those " not exactly powerhouse teams" would do well in the Big 10 or win the Big 10 championship? Yes? No? Probably? Maybe?

It does not seem that you know what you think you mean.

No. "Team x beat team y, and team y beat team z; therefore team x can beat team z" scenarios are stupid. I never said anything like that, in fact I said the opposite; the fact that Pac 10 teams have beaten USC does not mean those teams are any good. Stanford is bad, Oregon State is bad, and UCLA is bad. Ohio State is good. USC is great. However, from top to bottom the Pac 10 is not better than the Big Ten. I don't know why you feel the need to make cryptic and vague comments but it makes replying to you a chore.

Also, statements like this don't give you much leverage when speaking of someone's reading comprehension:

Quote:

---

Ture. USC has amazing talent. Amazing coaches and they have a fantastcic recruiting program. They have pretty much owned most teams from most everywhere over the past several years They are the best team in the country right now. They would own conference right now.

---

All I can say is ....... this was an ugly game with a capital U, G, L, and Y.

OSU never seemed to get untracked, and USC took advantage of every opportunity that presented itself.